European Professional Affairs Handbook for Tax Advisers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Professional Affairs Handbook for Tax Advisers European Professional Affairs Handbook for Tax Advisers European Professional Affairs Handbook for Tax Advisers Second edition 2013 by the CFE Professional Affairs Committee edited by Rudolf Reibel Confédération Fiscale Européenne © 2013 Confédération Fiscale Européenne (CFE) Avenue de Tervuren 188 A B-1150 Brussels Disclaimer This Handbook has been designed as an overview and a starting point for pro- fessionals looking for information on the conditions of practicing their profes- sion in another CFE country. It can only provide a general picture of the legal situation in the countries concerned and cannot cover the complexity of national regulation referred to. Furthermore, some of the Directives mentioned are still in the process of implementation which may lead to changes in national laws in the near future. Therefore, neither CFE, its representatives and staff, nor its member organisations accept any responsibility for the content of this Handbook. Where photocopying of parts of this publication is permitted under article 16B of the 1912 Copyright Act jo. the Decree of 20 June 1974, Stb. 351, as amended by the Decree of 23 August 1985, Stb. 471, and article 17 of the 1912 Copyright Act, legally due fees must be paid to Stichting Reprorecht (P.O. Box 882, 1180 AW Amstelveen). Where the use of parts of this publication for the purpose of anthologies, readers and other compila- tions (article 16 of the 1912 Copyright Act) is concerned, one should address the publisher. ISBN 978-90-8722-181-2 NUR 826 Foreword The first edition of this Handbook was supplied by CFE to European Institu- tions, national governments, international organisations and other stakehold- ers. It was sold to practitioners throughout Europe and beyond. We were pleased to note that the Handbook triggered global interest in countries as diverse as Australia, Chile, Japan, Thailand, Canada and the United States. The very positive reception given to the book encouraged us to develop the concept and produce a second edition. We have structured the Handbook as a versatile compendium and have added four new countries: Croatia, Poland, Portugal, and Ukraine. It serves as a guideline for tax practitioners interested in providing services cross-border. They will find information on existing requirements for tax advisers in other European States as well as specific contact points in the 23 Country Sheets included in the second part of book. It provides an overview for governments, European institutions and interna- tional organisations by listing facts on how the tax profession operates within a particular State and in particular whether it is regulated or not. The Handbook explains to CFE member organisations and interested prac- titioners how EU policy, legislation and case law impact on the way the profession operates at national level. Our passion is to inspire professional bodies in and beyond Europe to build or reform the tax profession in their country. We do this by showing approaches other countries have taken in response to common professional issues. It is clear from the 23 Country Sheets that the way tax advisers are regulated throughout Europe differs widely. Nonetheless, it is noted that qualification requirements, professional principles and ethics are indeed consistent and very similar, indifferent of the fact whether the profession is regulated by law or not. This is in part a result of CFE Guidelines on professional standards which present a common ground for CFE members and in part a common commitment by our member bodies to a continuing and high standard of professional excellence. We have taken the opportunity in this second edition to examine a number of issues more closely, in particular the tax adviser’s right of non-disclosure, the approach to anti-money laundering legislation and the relation of tax v Foreword advisers to other professions with similar or shared competences like law- yers, accountants and auditors. In addition the edition dedicates a section to examining current policy developments in professional affairs specifically reacting not only to State efforts to raise tax revenues but also to the European Commission’s effort to stimulate economic growth through deregulation of services. We believe that this Handbook is an important step towards the attainment of a truly European tax profession and can, through the support given by tax advisers to their client businesses, contribute to the development of cross border supplies and services and the completion of the internal market. We will follow a similar distribution programme to that of the first edition and will include CFE’s partner organisations in Asia, Oceania and West Africa. We intend to increase visibility for all CFE member organisations and highlight tax advisers as members of a diverse, distinct and ethical global profession. We would like to thank our member bodies for their contributions to this work and, especially, we would like to thank our cooperation partner, IBFD, for their generous support in making this Handbook available. Ian E. Hayes, Chairman of the CFE Professional Affairs Committee, 2011-2012 Dick G. Barmentlo, Chairman of the CFE Professional Affairs Committee vi From the idea to the Handbook: The methodology of the project Like the first edition of this Handbook published in December 2010, this second edition is based on a survey on the organisation of the tax profession in CFE countries. Work on this update started in April 2012 with the develop- ment of an extended questionnaire covering most of the issues addressed in the 2010 Handbook but putting more emphasis in particular on topical issues like the right of non-disclosure and anti money laundering, political develop- ments like new approaches of “enhanced cooperation” between taxpayers, tax authorities and tax advisers and the relation between tax advisers and neighbouring professions like lawyers, accountants and auditors. Input to the draft questionnaire has been provided by PAC members Hanna Filipczyk (Poland), Heather Brehcist and Terry Davies (both UK) and Moritz Alt (Germany). The questionnaire contained 71 questions plus related sub-questions in mul- tiple choice format with space for additional explanations. It was e-mailed to the members of the CFE Professional Affairs Committee, the 32 CFE member and observer organisations and three tax professional bodies out- side the CFE in May and June 2012. Responses from 23 countries were received by December 2012. In most countries, the answers were given by tax practitioners, in other countries by staff of the professional bodies. While some member organisations have formally approved their answers through their governing bodies, other responses may reflect individual views of the responding person. The responses were reviewed by the editor for consis- tency but generally not for accuracy of content. Where necessary, requests for clarification of single answers were sent to respondents. On the basis of responses and clarifications received and supplemented by publically available data, 23 Country Sheets (Part II of this Handbook) were drafted and sent to respondents in November and December 2012 for final review. Editorial deadline was 21 December 2012. In parallel, Part I of this Handbook was drafted as a “horizontal” part, sum- marizing and analysing the information received topic by topic and set- ting out the EU law context and its impacts on regulation at national level. Answers have been grouped and presented in coloured charts to better dis- play common elements and divergences. This Handbook has been the first and is, to our knowledge, still the only comprehensive overview on how the tax profession is organised throughout vii From the idea to the Handbook: The methodology of the project Europe. Other surveys dealing with similar topics have been conducted in the meantime, e.g. the European Commission’s Performance Check – Business Services (see Section 14.1.1 in Part I of this Handbook). The data in this Handbook has been collected from scratch, not taking over information from the 2010 edition (except for Italy and Luxembourg where the 2010 information has been checked and updated and Malta where the 2010 information has been re-used). It has also been collected independently, not relying on data gathered in any surveys by other organisations. viii From the idea to the Handbook: The methodology of the project It goes without saying that any attempt to visualise a highly complex matter such as different regulation in different countries will imply a certain degree of simplification. When interpreting the answers, an editor has a degree of latitude on how to classify them into easy-to-display and easy-to-compare categories. To this end, it is essential to have a background understanding of the situation of the profession in the countries surveyed. The work previ- ously undertaken by CFE has been very valuable in creating awareness in this regard. Rudolf Reibel, LL.M., CFE Fiscal and Professional Affairs Officer ix From the idea to the Handbook: The methodology of the project x Member and Observer Organisations of the CFE Member Organisations AT Kammer der Wirtschaftstreuhänder BE Institut des Experts-Comptables et des Conseils Fiscaux de Belgique / Instituut van de Accountants en de Belastingcon- sulenten CH Treuhand-Kammer / Chambre Fiduciaire CZ Komora Daňových Poradců ČR DE Bundessteuerberaterkammer Bundesverband der Steuerberater e.V. Deutscher Steuerberaterverband e.V. ES Asociación Española de Asesores Fiscales Registro de
Recommended publications
  • International Trade in Services
    International Trade in Services Public Disclosure Authorized NEW TRENDS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (GLWRUV 2OLYLHU&DWWDQHR0LFKDHO(QJPDQ6HEDVWLiQ6iH] 5REHUW06WHUQ Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized International Trade in Services International Trade in Services New Trends and Opportunities for Developing Countries Olivier Cattaneo, Michael Engman, Sebastián Sáez, and Robert M. Stern, Editors Washington, D.C. ©2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 13 12 11 10 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without per- mission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Integration Work
    Making Integration Work ASSESSMENT AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN QUALIFICATIONS Making Integration Work Making Integration Work ASSESS M ENT ENT A ND RECOGN I T I ON OF ON F O R E I GN QU GN A L I F I C A T I ONS Making Integration Work ASSESSMENT AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN QUALIFICATIONS This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2017), Making Integration Work: Assessment and Recognition of Foreign Qualifications, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264278271-en ISBN 978-92-64-27826-4 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-27827-1 (PDF) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: Cover Cover © http://www.tagxedo.com; © Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock.com Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 2017 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
    [Show full text]
  • European Regional and Urban Statistics Reference Guide
    ISSN 1977-0375 Methodologies and working papers European Regional and Urban Statistics Reference Guide 2008 edition EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROPEAN COMMISSION How to obtain EU publications Our priced publications are available from EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu), where you can place an order with the sales agent of your choice. The Publications Office has a worldwide network of sales agents. You can obtain their contact details by sending a fax to (352) 29 29-42758. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008 ISBN 978-92-79-04768-8 ISSN 1977-0375 Cat. No. KS-RA-07-024-EN-N Theme: General and regional statistics Collection: Methodologies and working papers © European Communities, 2008 EUROSTAT L-2920 Luxembourg — Tel. (352) 43 01-1 — website http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat Eurostat is the Statistical Office of the European Communities. Its mission is to pro- vide the European Union with high-quality statistical information. For that purpose, it gathers and analyses figures from the national statistical offices across Europe and provides comparable and harmonised data for the European Union to use in the defi- nition, implementation and analysis of Community policies. Its statistical products and services are also of great value to Europe’s business community, professional organisations, academics, librarians, NGOs, the media and citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • 271 EMN Ad-Hoc Query Recognition of Professional
    Ad-Hoc Query on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications obtained outside the European Union Requested by COM on 3rd November 2010 Compilation produced on 10th April 2011 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (20 in Total) Disclaimer: The following responses have been provided primarily for the purpose of information exchange among EMN NCPs in the framework of the EMN. The contributing EMN NCPs have provided, to the best of their knowledge, information that is up-to-date, objective and reliable. Note, however, that the information provided does not necessarily represent the official policy of an EMN NCPs' Member State. 1. Background Information In the Stockholm programme the European Council invited the Commission and the Council to evaluate existing policies that should, inter alia, improve skills recognition and labour matching between the European Union and third countries. A Staff Working Paper on addressing labour shortages through migration in EU Member States will be adopted in 2011. Work is at a preliminary stage, but the Paper will deal with: • how to identify the needs of the national labour markets; • how to identify the people who can fill those shortages The EMN study on "Satisfying labour demand through migration" will be one of the major inputs into this Staff Working Paper. Part of the second point is looking at the skills that third-country nationals have which would allow them to take up jobs for which national or other EU workers (Union preference) are not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Rendition (828.8359375)
    Ref. Ares(2015)4617379 - 27/10/2015 GROW/E-5 – 27 October 2015 Mutual evaluation of regulated professions Overview of the regulatory framework in the business services sector by using the example of architects Report based on information transmitted by Member States and on the meeting of 30th September 2014 1. CONTEXT AND AIM OF MUTUAL EVALUATION EXERCISE Following agreement made under Article 59 of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications1, as amended by Directive 2013/55/EU2, a commitment was made to undertake a mutual evaluation of the regulated professions. The importance of this exercise is reinforced by Conclusions from the June 2014 European Council 3 as well as from the special meeting of the European Council of 30th September 2014 which recalled the importance of jobs, growth and competitiveness enhancing measures alongside 'rapid progress on implementing these orientations'4. This report presents an overview of the information communicated to the Commission by Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland through specific reports5 and entries in the professional regulations database6 as well as of the discussions which took place during the meeting on 30 September 2014 on mutual evaluation dedicated to this sector7. This report is established with the aim to facilitate the mutual evaluation exercise and is therefore not a comprehensive report on the sector nor on the specific profession. Whilst the following focuses upon the profession of Architect, as an example for professions in the business services sector, the experiences and understanding gained from this discussion are meant to be understood across the professional landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis, David Bokhorst Traces the Implementation Process of Di�Ferent Recommendations in Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, and Germany
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Governing imbalances in the economic and monetary union A political economy analysis of the macroeconomic imbalance procedure Bokhorst, D.J. Publication date 2019 Document Version Final published version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bokhorst, D. J. (2019). Governing imbalances in the economic and monetary union: A political economy analysis of the macroeconomic imbalance procedure. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 How Can the euro area protect itself from future economic Crisis? The framework governing the euro has been significantly expanded in recent years. Among the key innovations is the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP), whereby the voor de openbare verdediging EU monitors economic vulnerabilities among Member States and issues policy van het proefschri�t recommendations to address them.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH PROFESSIONAL MOBILITY and HEALTH SYSTEMS 23 EVIDENCE from 17 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Edited by Matthias Wismar, Claudia B
    Cover_WHO_nr23_Mise en page 1 6/10/11 17:59 Page1 23 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL MOBILITY AND HEALTH SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL MOBILITY AND HEALTH HEALTH Health professional mobility affects the performance of health systems and these EVIDENCE FROM 17 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES impacts are assuming greater significance given increasing mobility in Europe, a Health Professional 23 process fuelled by the European Union (EU) enlargements in 2004 and 2007. This volume presents research conducted within the framework of the European Commission’s Health PROMeTHEUS project. This research was undertaken in order to address gaps in the knowledge of the numbers, trends and impacts and of the policy Mobility and Health responses to this dynamic situation. Observatory Observatory The following questions were used to provide analytical guidance for the 17 country Studies Series case studies reported here: from Austria, Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Systems Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. • What are the scale and characteristics of health professional mobility in the EU? Evidence from • What have been the effects of EU enlargement? 17 European countries • What are the motivations of the mobile workforce? • What are the resulting impacts on health system performance? Edited by Matthias Wismar • What is the policy relevance of those impacts? Claudia B. Maier • What are the policy options to address health professional mobility issues? Irene A. Glinos Gilles Dussault Josep Figueras The editors Matthias Wismar is Senior Health Policy Analyst at the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Irene A. Glinos, Gilles Dussault, Josep Figueras Josep Gilles Dussault, Glinos, Irene A.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Free Movement of Workers in Portugal in 2004 Rapporteur
    REPORT on the Free Movement of Workers in Portugal in 2004 Rapporteur: Nuno Piçarra University Nova of Lisbon November 2005 783 Portugal General remarks 1. Concerning the free movement of persons (EU citizens), 2004 was marked by the opening of the procedure of revision of Decree-Law 60/93, as amended by Decree-Law 250/98, which sets out the conditions of entry and stay for citizens of the Member States of the Euro- pean Union and their family members, due to the approval of the Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April of the European Parliament and the Council, concerning the right of the European citi- zens and the members of their family to move and to remain freely on the territory of the Member States. This Directive revokes the different directives transposed by Decree-Law 60/93: Directives 64/221/EEC (co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health); 68/360/EEC (abolition of restriction of movement and residence within the community for workers of the member states and their families); 72/194/EEC (extending to workers exercising the right to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State the scope of the Directive 64/221/EEC); 73/148/EEC (abolition of restrictions of movement and residence for the purposes of establishment and provision of services); 75/34/CEE and 75/35/EEC; Directives 90/364/CEE (right of resi- dence), 90/365/EEC (right of residence of employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity) and 93/96/EEC (right of residence for students).
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Bodies
    Professional bodies Study • January 2021 This study was conducted by Aurore Boyeldieu, Thomas Guérin, legal advisers in the legal department, and Juliette Théry-Schultz, legal director, under the direction of Isabelle de Silva, president of the Autorité de la concurrence. 2 Foreword Professional bodies have existed in different forms since ancient times. At different times in history, professional bodies have been able to contribute to the structuring of professions or activities, from former merchant guilds to professional orders, including business unions in the IT or digital sector. The Autorité's interest in the activity of professional bodies goes back a long way. It is a fact that the functioning of professional bodies may be conducive to anticompetitive activities, in particular price agreements, anticompetitive exchanges of information or concerted actions aimed at slowing the development of competition. In this well-known landscape, a major modification will come into play in 2021. Indeed, the transposition of directive n ° 2019/1 known as “ECN+” will lead to the removal of the specific sanction ceiling which was previously applicable to professional bodies, and which severely limited the financial “risk” in the event of an infringement, this being capped at 3 million euros. With the ECN+ directive, this ceiling is no longer applicable, professional bodies are exposed, in the event of infringements of the competition rules, to penalties of up to 10% of each of its members' cumulative worldwide turnover. This therefore constitutes a "Copernican revolution" in terms of financial risk for professional bodies that would commit competition law infringements. The Autorité has therefore decided to help economic players anticipate this development, by dedicating a specific study to professional bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Redress in the Member States of the European Union
    STUDY Requested by the JURI committee Collective redress in the Member States of the European Union Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union PE 608.829 - October 2018 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT FOR CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGAL AFFAIRS COLLECTIVE REDRESS IN THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the Committee on Legal Affairs, aims to assess the current state of play of collective redress at national and European levels, evaluate the opportunity of a European intervention in the matter and provide the European Parliament with concrete recommendations. Both the assessment and the recommendations have been drafted keeping in mind the essential issue raised by collective redress: access to justice. This principle, which is essential in a Union enforcing the rule of law, is currently challenged by the existing divergences. As such the creation of harmonised collective redress mechanism is becoming an increasingly pressing matter. PE 608.829 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs and commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy Departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.10.2013 SWD(2013) 402 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.10.2013 SWD(2013) 402 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the outcome of the peer review on legal form, shareholding and tariff requirements under the Services Directive Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on Evaluating national regulations on access to professions {COM(2013) 676 final} EN EN Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1. The peer review process............................................................................................... 3 1.1. Scope and methodology ............................................................................................... 3 1.2. Main objectives ............................................................................................................ 4 2. Results of the Peer Review .......................................................................................... 4 2.1. Legal form and shareholding requirements in the EU ................................................. 4 2.2. Effect of legal form and shareholding requirements on establishment........................ 6 2.2.1. Restrictions on secondary establishment ..................................................................... 6 2.2.2. Restrictions on primary establishment......................................................................... 7 2.3. Convergence
    [Show full text]
  • 1985-2010: 25 Years of Free Movement of Workers in Portugal
    Portugal-Spain Free Movement Seminar Lisbon, 7 and 8 October 2010 CONFERENCE REPORT By Nuno Piçarra and Francisco Borges Faculty of Law of the Universidade Nova of Lisbon I. Introduction The Faculty of Law of the Universidade Nova of Lisbon organized a regional seminar sponsored by the European Network on Free Movement of Workers, which took place in Lisbon, 7 and 8 October 2010. It was held under the title “1985-2010: 25 Years of Free Movement of Workers between Portugal and Spain in the Framework of the European Union”. The objectives of the seminar were, on one hand, to assess the impact of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on the legal acquis on the free movement of workers; on the other hand, the seminar aimed at scrutinizing the legal and practical problems which still limit the free movement of workers between Portugal and Spain, particularly in respect (i) to the access to the public sector and (ii) to the situation of the frontier workers. II. Free Movement of Workers and the Treaty of Lisbon The first session included two presentations, one by Cristina Gortázar, of the Universidad Pontificia Comillas of Madrid, and the other by Alessandra Silveira, of the Faculty of Law of Universidade do Minho, Braga. 1 1. Cristina Gortázar shortly summarized the evolution of the free movement of workers from the Treaty of Rome till the Treaty of Lisbon in the light of the European single market, the European citizenship and the area of freedom, security and justice. According to the author, the main improvements of the Treaty of Lisbon in this field were the attribution to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Charter) of the same legal value as the EU Treaties, the clarification of the repartition of competences between the European Union and the Member States and the strengthening – although limited – of the democratic legitimacy of the European Union, with a more significant participation of the European Parliament and the Parliaments of the Member States in the legislative procedure.
    [Show full text]