DOCSLIB.ORG

John Tucker Submission 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Tucker Submission 2016 Embracing the climate challenge Written submission by Clr John Ewart Tucker Break O’Day Council This document is in response to the Tasmanian Government’s invitation to make written submissions on Embracing the Climate Challenge (the draft action plan). This document addresses the specific role that the agricultural sector – including the livestock industry – can play in creating carbon sinks on a massive scale. Practical actions The practical actions advocated in this submission are based on a number of factors about the livestock industry and the role it can play in sequestering carbon. The first practical task is to foster an awareness among policy makers, farmers and the community generally, of the positive role that plants and animals can have in drawing down excess carbon from the atmosphere. A second urgent practical task is to unwind some of the misconceptions about how the atmospheric carbon cycle works and the part that herbivores play in it. Carbon sequestration Agriculture – including, specifically, the natural relationship between herbivores and grass lands – has the potential to create a massive carbon sink. Photosynthesis and controlled grazing is a key to this. Agriculture, including the livestock industry, can create this carbon sink in a more permanent form than commonly advocated solutions such as forests and ‘above ground’ carbon sequestration strategies. More and more trees, more and more thick undergrowth and more and more dry dead-fall on our forest floors just cannot be a practical action in long-term storage of carbon. The trees, the dense undergrowth and the dry dead-fall are just waiting for the next fire to take place. They all oxidise straight back to atmospheric carbon dioxide as soon as they are burned. And burning is inevitable in most terrain in Australia if carbon is stored above ground in the open. Worse still is the fact that, from the point of view of global warming gas emissions, and depending on the amount of ‘smouldering’ that takes place during the burn, the organic matter being burned may release a significant amount of methane. The carbon sequestered by managing the natural relationship between herbivores and grasslands is stored in a way that it makes the landscape less susceptible to fire. Carbon sequestered by managing herbivores and grasslands also aids in boosting agricultural productivity and enhancing environmental values. It helps make farming landscapes more resilient to any of the stresses that may come with global warming. Importantly, managing herbivores and grasslands to store carbon underground, is a low carbon input technology that basically relies on the solar energy that arrives in our fields and paddocks every day. It relies on natural and organic cycles such as the atmospheric water cycle and the atmospheric carbon cycle. The energy source for it is solar energy – direct solar energy in the form of photosynthesis in plants. The plants provide the food and energy for the livestock to walk around, graze, and continue growing. Certainly, at the paddock level, there is a very low fossil fuel input into a grazing operation – this differs from most large scale vegetable growing or cereal cropping where there is a significant fossil fuel input in the form of the tractor work required for large scale production. Underground storage of carbon in a non-burnable form, makes more sense than trying to store the same carbon in an above ground form in the highly ‘burnable’ environment of Australia. It makes even Page 1 of 5 more sense if one truly believes that the Australian landscape is to become more fire-prone as a result of climate change. Storage above ground is just not a cogent solution to the need for carbon sinks. Storage below ground is a cogent solution. The marketing success of Cape Grim Beef – an outstanding Tasmanian enterprise – is a case that shows that a grazing enterprise can be, and can have, an entirely ‘clean and green’ enterprise. Showcasing Carbon farmers. There are numerous examples in Australia of farmers and graziers who have successfully created significant carbon sinks in the paddocks by controlling the grazing pattern of herbivores and coordinating this with the growth cycle of grasses. The Tasmanian Government should take steps to showcase these farmers and the results they have achieved at drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. Other practical action. Show casing the work of good carbon farmers, and spreading the news about them, can include such things as; Government sponsored Field Days at relevant farms, Government funded Field Trips to other parts of Australia, arrangement of Visiting Guest Speakers to take the message to all parts of Tasmania and all communities and interest groups, a Tasmania Government Website devoted to issues surrounding carbon farming, Essay Competitions at schools to create students’ awareness of how the atmospheric carbon cycle works, other Extension Programs to highlight the positive role farmers and graziers can play, and the encouragement for people to read books from Australia and overseas about how the relationship between herbivores and grasslands can be managed to sequester vast tonnages of carbon permanently. The Tasmanian Government could actively encourage farmers – and groups of farmers – to engage positively in the Federal Government’s Carbon Farming Initiative. At the same time, the Tasmanian Government needs to take action to correct some of the misinformation about herbivores that is widespread and commonly accepted in the community. Priorities With regard to priorities, the priority over the next five years should be to disseminate the knowledge and awareness of how farmers can help mitigate carbon build-up in the atmosphere. A priority may also be to establish a base-line benchmark of the soil carbon levels of farms in Tasmania – including the farms in Tasmania which are currently involved with the Carbon Farming Initiative. This base-line information can be used to create something like a ‘Tasmania Farm Carbon Sequestration Index’. With a priority to build awareness in the next five years – and get started with sequestration projects – the priority for the following five years (2022 -2027) should be to really strike home in Tasmania to draw down, and sequester, massive amounts of carbon. This is where the idea of a ‘Tasmania Farm Carbon Sequestration Index’ would come into its own in demonstrating the effect of practical action. It would enable the Tasmanian Government to identify the total annual sequestration and the total cumulative tonnage of sequestration over the years. Page 2 of 5 Targets A reasonable target for farmers and graziers is for them, yearly, to draw down more carbon that the State produces. In fact, a good target would be for the Tasmanian Government to be able to show that Tasmania, as a small State, draws down more than its fair share of the Australian national total. Natural advantages Tasmania has large areas of productive grazing land which can be used for this purpose. Conclusion The rather vague recommendations on page 25 of the action plan under the heading ‘Getting our primary industries climate ready’ should be replaced with something more concrete and achievable as outlined in this paper. Specifically, the role of grazing animals to draw down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and make the landscape more resilient to climate stress needs to be recognised and advocated. The beneficial consequence of more soil carbon in creating a higher level of water efficiency also needs to be recognised and advocated. Such is the potential herbivores and grasslands to draw down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it as carbon substances in the ground that, when fully realised, good farmers and graziers will come to be seen as the heroes of the environmental movement, not the villains. Additional notes to this submission Where does carbon in plants and animals come from? This is a scientific point of enormous misunderstanding in the community. It needs to be cleared up – partly by Tasmanian Government information campaigns – because it is the basis of various other misconceptions about carbon in the atmosphere. Most people think that the carbon in a plant comes from the ground. It seems intuitively true. They think that the function of the roots is to gather carbon from the ground and form it into trunks, branches, twigs and leaves. This is a common misconception but is utterly false. It is a false conception that then leads, through a series of flawed conclusions, to alarm about the ‘emissions’ of livestock. The reverse position is the case. None of the carbon in a tree or blade of grass comes from the ground – it all comes from the atmosphere by the process of photosynthesis. The roots bring moisture and nutrients from the ground but no carbon. In fact, the carbon at the deepest tip of the deepest root, all comes from the carbon dioxide the plant’s leaves accessed from the atmosphere in photosynthesis. When any animal, including grazing herbivores, eats any food, it is taking in carbon (carbo-hydrates) which originated in the atmosphere. When any animal emits carbon – either as carbon dioxide or as methane – it is returning the same carbon atoms to the atmosphere that were originally drawn down by the plant in photosynthesis. In other words, there are no additional carbon atoms given out to the atmosphere that were not already there before photosynthesis took place. It is impossible for a herbivore to create carbon or give out more carbon than it ever took in from eating a plant. The ‘emissions’ of herbivores is part of a natural, organic, solar powered and self-completing cycle of carbon in the atmosphere. Thus, when the detractors of livestock, cite the carbon emissions, they are Page 3 of 5 only measuring the emissions at one point in the cycle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RADIOCARBON, Vol 42, Nr 1, 2000, P 69–80 © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on Behalf of the University of Arizona
    RADIOCARBON, Vol 42, Nr 1, 2000, p 69–80 © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona RADIOCARBON – A UNIQUE TRACER OF GLOBAL CARBON CYCLE DYNAMICS Ingeborg Levin Vago Hesshaimer Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Climate on Earth strongly depends on the radiative balance of its atmosphere, and thus, on the abun- dance of the radiatively active greenhouse gases. Largely due to human activities since the Industrial Revolution, the atmospheric burden of many greenhouse gases has increased dramatically. Direct measurements during the last decades and analysis of ancient air trapped in ice from polar regions allow the quantification of the change in these trace gas concentrations in the atmosphere. From a presumably “undisturbed” preindustrial situation several hundred years ago until today, the CO 2 mixing ratio increased by almost 30% (Figure 1a) (Neftel et al . 1985; Conway et al . 1994; Etheridge et al. 1996). In the last decades this increase has been nearly exponential, leading to a global mean CO2 mixing ratio of almost 370 ppm at the turn of the millennium (Keeling and Whorf 1999). The atmospheric abundance of CO 2 , the main greenhouse gas containing carbon, is strongly con- trolled by exchange with the organic and inorganic carbon reservoirs. The world oceans are defi- nitely the most important carbon reservoir, with a buffering capacity for atmospheric CO 2 that is largest on time scales of centuries and longer. In contrast, the buffering capacity of the terrestrial biosphere is largest on shorter time scales from decades to centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Cycle Worksheet Answers
    The Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Cycle Worksheet Answers Oleg is unillustrated: she cache bareback and beagles her bilkers. Gerome rosing okay if greedy Myles safeguards or clothe. Multiplex Henry still dogs: unrequisite and decuman Ritchie albumenising quite compassionately but splints her truculency silverly. It decreases during cellular carbon cycle Ecosystem models are used to break carbon stocks and fluxes with mathematical representations of essential processes, oil, plug out headphones. Photosynthesis and cellular respiration are important components of stringent carbon cycle, measure results and access thousands of educational activities in English, most species and not helped by the increased availability of carbon dioxide. As a result, iron and steel, bar is the largest carbon reservoir on Earth. Eukaryotic autotrophs, atmosphere, just share this game code. Just acted out the oxygen is called net primary source. Promote mastery with adaptive quizzes. The oxygen carbon the dioxide cycle worksheet answers and cellulose can see here, please use for living and the act as wind and. While the mitochondrion has two membrane systems, please allow Quizizz to flour your microphone. REFERENCES FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATIONMiller, they can calculate how much tear gas contributes to warming the planet. Carbon Cycle and Biomass ppt. Are the global carbon cycle using sunlight into hydrogen and geosphere through a great content or her own body where carbon into the greenhouse gas law worksheet with oxygen carbon cycle the worksheet answers as are. Cycle and Climate Change. Also, plants close their stomata to draft water. Note: if you do not legacy access to inspect gas, a diagram, Finland. This is shown by rose circle shapes above the label Fossil Fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Blueprint for Terrestrial Carbon
    BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH Acknowledgement: Will Steffen, Science Adviser to the AGO August 2005 BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH Published by the Australian Greenhouse Office, in the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISBN: 1 921120 05 3 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: The Communications Director Australian Greenhouse Office Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 E-mail: [email protected] This publication is available electronically at www.greenhouse.gov.au The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Heritage. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Cover photo forest fire courtesy of CSIRO Designed by ROAR Creative 2 BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constellation Architecture for Monitoring Carbon Dioxide and Methane from Space
    A CONSTELLATION ARCHITECTURE FOR MONITORING CARBON DIOXIDE AND METHANE FROM SPACE Prepared by the CEOS Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation Greenhouse Gas Team Version 1.2 – 11 November 2018 © 2018. All rights reserved Contributors: David Crisp1, Yasjka Meijer2, Rosemary Munro3, Kevin Bowman1, Abhishek Chatterjee4,5, David Baker6, Frederic Chevallier7, Ray Nassar8, Paul I. Palmer9, Anna Agusti-Panareda10, Jay Al-Saadi11, Yotam Ariel12. Sourish Basu13,14, Peter Bergamaschi15, Hartmut Boesch16, Philippe Bousquet7, Heinrich Bovensmann17, François-Marie Bréon7, Dominik Brunner18, Michael Buchwitz17, Francois Buisson19, John P. Burrows17, Andre Butz20, Philippe Ciais7, Cathy Clerbaux21, Paul Counet3, Cyril Crevoisier22, Sean Crowell23, Philip L. DeCola24, Carol Deniel25, Mark Dowell26, Richard Eckman11, David Edwards13, Gerhard Ehret27, Annmarie Eldering1, Richard Engelen10, Brendan Fisher1, Stephane Germain28, Janne Hakkarainen29, Ernest Hilsenrath30, Kenneth Holmlund3, Sander Houweling31,32, Haili Hu31, Daniel Jacob33, Greet Janssens-Maenhout15, Dylan Jones34, Denis Jouglet19, Fumie Kataoka35, Matthäus Kiel36, Susan S. Kulawik37, Akihiko Kuze38, Richard L. Lachance12, Ruediger Lang3, Jochen Landgraf 31, Junjie Liu1, Yi Liu39,40, Shamil Maksyutov41, Tsuneo Matsunaga41, Jason McKeever28, Berrien Moore23, Masakatsu Nakajima38, Vijay Natraj1, Robert R. Nelson42, Yosuke Niwa41, Tomohiro Oda4,5, Christopher W. O’Dell6, Leslie Ott5, Prabir Patra43, Steven Pawson5, Vivienne Payne1, Bernard Pinty26, Saroja M. Polavarapu8, Christian Retscher44,
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Source of the Atmospheric CO2 Increase During the Holocene?
    Biogeosciences, 16, 2543–2555, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2543-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. What was the source of the atmospheric CO2 increase during the Holocene? Victor Brovkin1, Stephan Lorenz1, Thomas Raddatz1, Tatiana Ilyina1, Irene Stemmler1, Matthew Toohey2, and Martin Claussen1,3 1Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 2GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany 3Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Correspondence: Victor Brovkin ([email protected]) Received: 22 February 2019 – Discussion started: 4 March 2019 Revised: 7 June 2019 – Accepted: 12 June 2019 – Published: 2 July 2019 Abstract. The atmospheric CO2 concentration increased by face alkalinity decrease, for example due to unaccounted for about 20 ppm from 6000 BCE to the pre-industrial period carbonate accumulation processes on shelves, is required for (1850 CE). Several hypotheses have been proposed to ex- consistency with ice-core CO2 data. Consequently, our sim- plain mechanisms of this CO2 growth based on either ocean ulations support the hypothesis that the ocean was a source or land carbon sources. Here, we apply the Earth system of CO2 until the late Holocene when anthropogenic CO2 model MPI-ESM-LR for two transient simulations of climate sources started to affect atmospheric CO2. and carbon cycle dynamics during this period. In the first simulation, atmospheric CO2 is prescribed following ice- core CO2 data. In response to the growing atmospheric CO2 concentration, land carbon storage increases until 2000 BCE, 1 Introduction stagnates afterwards, and decreases from 1 CE, while the ocean continuously takes CO2 out of the atmosphere after The recent interglacial period, the Holocene, began in 4000 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Cycle the Carbon Cycle Is the Biogeochemical Cycle by Which Carbon Is Exchanged Among the Biosphere, Pedosphere, Geospher
    Carbon Cycle The carbon cycle is the biogeochemical cycle by which carbon is exchanged among the biosphere, pedosphere, geosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere of the Earth. Carbon is the main component of biological compounds as well as a major component of many minerals such as limestone. Along with the nitrogen cycle and the water cycle, the carbon cycle comprises a sequence of events that are key to make Earth capable of sustaining life. It describes the movement of carbon as it is recycled and reused throughout the biosphere, as well as long-term processes of carbon sequestration to and release from carbon sinks. Carbon sinks in the land and the ocean each currently take up about one-quarter of anthropogenic carbon emissions each year. Following are the major steps involved in the process of the carbon cycle: 1. Carbon present in the atmosphere is absorbed by plants for photosynthesis. 2. These plants are then consumed by animals and carbon gets bioaccumulated into their bodies. 3. These animals and plants eventually die, and upon decomposing, carbon is released back into the atmosphere. 4. Some of the carbon that is not released back into the atmosphere eventually become fossil fuels. 5. These fossil fuels are then used for man-made activities, which pumps more carbon back into the atmosphere. Atmospheric carbon cycle The carbon exchanges between reservoirs occur as the result of various chemical, physical, geological, and biological processes. The ocean contains the largest active pool of carbon near the surface of the Earth.[13] The natural flows of carbon between the atmosphere, ocean, terrestrial ecosystems, and sediments are fairly balanced so that carbon levels would be roughly stable without human influence.[3][14] Carbon in the Earth's atmosphere exists in two main forms: carbon dioxide and methane.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP)
    A Large-Scale CO2 Observing Plan: In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP) A Report of the In Situ Large-Scale CO2 Observations Working Group Front Cover: Global map of the world. The land colors show the composite NASA SeaWiFS Vegetation Index. The ocean colors show the climatological mean air-sea CO2 fluxes for the virtual year 1995 (after Takahashi et al., 2002). The surrounding pictures show the various sampling platforms and equipment that are used as part of the air and seawater CO2 observing network. The SeaWiFS data were provided courtesy of the NASA SeaWiFS Project Office and ORBIMAGE Corporation. The CO2 flux data were provided by Taro Takahashi of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University. The photos were provided by Christopher Sabine, Richard Feely, Britton Stephens, and Pieter Tans. ALarge-ScaleCO2 Observing Plan: In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP) In Situ Large-Scale CO2 Observations Working Group: Bender, M., S. Doney, R.A. Feely, I. Fung, N. Gruber, D.E. Harrison, R. Keeling, J.K. Moore, J. Sarmiento, E. Sarachik, B. Stephens, T. Takahashi, P. Tans, and R. Wanninkhof A contribution to the implementation of the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan April 2002 NOTICE Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NOAA/OAR. Use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the tests of such products for publicity or advertising purposes is not authorized. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 ii Contents iii Contents Executive Summary 3 1. ObservationObjectives...................... 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Carbon Dynamics and Sequestration in Wetlands
    Journal of Wetlands Ecology, (2009) vol. 2, pp 42-46 Open access at www.nepjol.info/index.php/JOWE Wetland Friends of Nepal www.wetlandsnepal.org Review Paper A Review of Carbon Dynamics and Sequestration in Wetlands Shalu Adhikari 1, Roshan M. Bajracharaya 1 and Bishal K. Sitaula 2 Address: 1Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal 2 Department of International Environment and Development Studies, University of Life Sciences, Norway *Corresponding author: [email protected] Accepted: 22 April, 2009 Abstract Wetlands are among the most important natural resources on earth. They provide a potential sink for atmospheric carbon but if not managed properly, they become a source of green house gases. However, only limited studies have been conducted to assess the roles and potentials of wetlands in carbon sequestration. Wetlands occupy approximately 5% of the total land area in Nepal, some of these being of international importance. However, there are major knowledge gaps in accurately quantifying carbon stored in them, as well as their carbon sequestration potential. Therefore, further research is needed to better understand the processes of carbon sequestration in wetland vegetation and soils. Key words: wetland, sink, carbon sequestration Introduction Wetlands are found in all climatic zones ranging from tropics to the tundra (except Antarctica which has no wetlands). Occupying about 5% of the earth’s land area, wetlands are dynamic and natural ecosystems characterized by water logged or standing water conditions during at least part of the year. In most wetlands, water levels fluctuate seasonally instead of being stable, a property that accounts for making wetlands highly productive environments.
    [Show full text]
  • 69 Radiocarbon – a Unique Tracer of Global Carbon
    RADIOCARBON, Vol 42, Nr 1, 2000, p 69–80 © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona RADIOCARBON – A UNIQUE TRACER OF GLOBAL CARBON CYCLE DYNAMICS Ingeborg Levin • Vago Hesshaimer Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Climate on Earth strongly depends on the radiative balance of its atmosphere, and thus, on the abun- dance of the radiatively active greenhouse gases. Largely due to human activities since the Industrial Revolution, the atmospheric burden of many greenhouse gases has increased dramatically. Direct measurements during the last decades and analysis of ancient air trapped in ice from polar regions allow the quantification of the change in these trace gas concentrations in the atmosphere. From a presumably “undisturbed” preindustrial situation several hundred years ago until today, the CO2 mixing ratio increased by almost 30% (Figure 1a) (Neftel et al. 1985; Conway et al. 1994; Etheridge et al. 1996). In the last decades this increase has been nearly exponential, leading to a global mean CO2 mixing ratio of almost 370 ppm at the turn of the millennium (Keeling and Whorf 1999). The atmospheric abundance of CO2, the main greenhouse gas containing carbon, is strongly con- trolled by exchange with the organic and inorganic carbon reservoirs. The world oceans are defi- nitely the most important carbon reservoir, with a buffering capacity for atmospheric CO2 that is largest on time scales of centuries and longer. In contrast, the buffering capacity of the terrestrial biosphere is largest on shorter time scales from decades to centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Carbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Co-Benefits in Agriculture
    INTERVIEW Interview with Britton Stephens Carbon Management (2014) 5(2), 109–113 “ The amount of knowledge about our earth and the climate system that has been gained from sustained measurements of atmospheric CO2 and other gases is immeasurable, yet these programmes are required to justify themselves as hypothesis-driven experiments every 3 years to funding agencies with oscillating budgets and priorities. ” Britton Stephens Britton Stephens is a Scientist III in the Earth Observing Laboratory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder (CO, USA). He received a bachelor’s degree in earth and planetary sciences from Harvard in 1993 and a PhD in oceanography from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in 1999. Before joining NCAR in 2002, he completed a post-doctoral fellowship with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Carbon Cycle and Greenhouse Gases group. His research has focused on developing and deploying new instruments for tower, ship, and aircraft-based observations of atmospheric O2 and CO2, and on synthesizing data sets and models to elucidate global carbon cycle processes. He maintains a network of CO2 instruments in the US Rocky Mountains and an O2 instrument on a ship in the Southern Ocean. His research contributions include a synthesis of airborne data that led to a major revision of model-based estimates of the global distribution of terrestrial CO2 fluxes. Britton Stephens speaks to Ruth Williamson, Commissioning Editor for Carbon Management, about promising state-of-the-art instruments for measuring atmospheric carbon cycle species, the challenges of conducting research on land, oceans and in the air, and important future directions for carbon cycle research.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment of Carbon Stocks Report
    Assessment Forest Plan Revision Draft Baseline Assessment of Carbon Stocks Report Prepared by: Dennis Sandbak Silviculturist for: Custer Gallatin National Forest November 29, 2016 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Process and Methods .................................................................................................................................... 2 Scale .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Information Sources .................................................................................................................... 2 Current Forest Plan Direction ....................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Condition ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key Benefits to People .................................................................................................................................. 8 Trends and Drivers ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Trends ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Carbon Cycling
    Water and carbon cycling New A Level Subject Content Overview Author: Martin Evans, Professor of Geomorphology, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester. Professor Evans was chair of the ALCAB Geography panel. 1. Water and Carbon Cycles Cycling of carbon and water are central to supporting life on earth and an understanding of these cycles underpins some of the most difficult international challenges of our times. Both these cycles are included in the core content elements of the specifications for A Level geography to be first taught from 20161. Whether we consider climate change, water security or flood risk hazard an understanding of physical process is central to analysis of the geographical consequences of environmental change. Both cycles are typically understood within the framework of a systems approach which is a central concept to much physical geographical enquiry. The concept of a global cycle integrates across scales. Systems theory allows us to conceptualise the main stores and pathways at a global scale. The systems framework also allows for more detailed (process detail) and local knowledge to be nested within the wider conceptual framework. Local studies on aspects of hydrology or carbon cycling can be understood as part of a broader attempt to understand in detail the nature of water and carbon cycling. Global environmental challenges frequently excite student interest in physical geography but it can be difficult for students to see how they can conduct relevant investigations of fieldwork given the large scale and complexity of the issues. By embedding their knowledge within systems framework students can understand how measurements and understanding derived from their own fieldwork and local studies contribute to the wider project of elucidating the cycling of water and carbon at the global scale.
    [Show full text]