Prairie Landowner Guide for WESTERN WASHINGTON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prairie Landowner Guide for WESTERN WASHINGTON Prairie Landowner Guide FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON Written by Sara Noland and Laurel Carver Major Contributors The Nature Conservancy Natural Resources Conservation Service US Fish and Wildlife Service Thurston County Conservation District San Juan County Land Bank Washington Department of Natural Resources ESA Prairie Landowner Guide FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON April 2011 Table of Contents Acknowledgements . iii Chapter 1. Introduction . .1 A Brief Prairie History Purpose of this Handbook Who Should Use this Handbook? Chapter 2. Getting to Know Prairies . 5 Where Are Prairies Found? Prairie Soils Wet Prairies Oak Woodlands What Plants and Animals Live on Prairies? Chapter 3. Getting Started . 45 Step 1: Assessing Your Site Step 2: Setting Goals Step 3: Making a Work Plan Chapter 4. On the Ground . .51 Step 1: Preparing the Site Step 2: Installing Native Plants Step 3: Maintaining the Site over the Long Term Chapter 5. Residential Lands . .57 Assessing the Site Setting Goals Making a Work Plan Preparing the Site Installing Native Plants Maintaining the Site Chapter 6. Working Lands . .65 Assessing the Site Setting Goals Making a Work Plan Preparing the Site Installing Native Plants Maintaining the Site Appendix: Resources for Landowners . A-1 1. Bibliography 2. Weed Control Options 3. Native Plant Suppliers 4. Funding and Incentive Programs 5. Agencies and Organizations 6. Government Sources for Maps and Aerial Photos 7. Native Grassland Communities Glossary . .G-1 Table of Contents | i Acknowledgements Granting Agency US Fish and Wildlife Service ESA Cathie Conolly Sara Noland Julie Bayer Rosemary Baker Th e Nature Conservancy Laurel Carver Hannah Anderson Patrick Dunn More Contributors: Marty Chaney – Natural Resources Conservation Service Adam Sant – Thurston County Conservation District Ted Thomas – US Fish and Wildlife Service Joseph Arnett – Department of Natural Resources Eliza Habegger – San Juan County Land Bank Special Th anks To: Carri Marshner Kym Foley Kathleen Preece Rod Gilbert Lynda Boyer Grace Diehl Tom Noland Acknowledgements | iii A P T E C H1 R Introduction Within the southern reaches of Puget Sound country and western Washington is a unique land of prairies and oak woodlands. Once sustained by native peoples, prairies are one of the rarest and most endangered ecosystems in the nation. Today, as in the past, they are once again dependent on human activity to protect and sustain them. The word “prairie” is a French word meaning simply a “meadow,” “grassland,” or “pasture.” It typically refers to a fl at or rolling land that historically supported grasses and forbs. Trees are absent or few, and the moisture supply is moderate. A key characteristic of Washington prairies is their gravelly structure and nutrient-poor soils, a legacy of the region’s glacial past. Why do we care about prairies? The prairies of western Washington are a valuable ecological and cultural land- scape, supporting rare and threatened species that contrib- ute to our region’s rich biological diversity. The prairies are a reminder of western Washington’s glacial past and its fi rst Rod Gilbert PHOTO BY: human inhabitants. They offer residents an opportunity to Photo 1-1. Harsh Paintbrush (Castilleja hispida) is a distinctive observe and spend time in a rare and unique landscape. orange-red colored fl ower. A Brief Prairie History Purpose of The prairies of western Washington originated some 15,000 years ago, when the Vashon ice sheet blanketed the region. this Handbook This ice sheet, or glacier, was 1,500 feet thick at Tacoma, This handbook focuses on the prairies of western Wash- extending south to what is now Thurston County. As this ington. It provides a short history of these special places massive glacier retreated, it scraped and carved the terrain, and explains where they are located. The handbook leaving behind layered deposits of water-sculpted, rounded will tell you about the plants and animals that live in our rocks and gravel of mixed sizes. Over thousands of years, prairies. It provides photographs, maps, and diagrams to rocks broke down, and organic matter accumulated to help you understand the “where” and the “what” of the make up the soils we have today. These soils have a poor prairie world. capacity to hold water and are classifi ed as excessively well-drained and nutrient poor. Unlike the deep soils of the Most importantly, the handbook suggests how you as a Great Plains tall-grass prairies, western Washington prairies prairie landowner can take care of these special places. have relatively shallow, stony soils. Caretaking might mean practicing land management that will reduce your impact on prairies, while remaining com- Northwest Coast tribes sustained these areas as grassy, patible with other uses you may have for the land, such open plains by setting fi res in the summer and fall. The as pastures, farming, gardens, and lawns. fi res kept the encroaching trees at bay, improving hunt- ing and gathering, particularly for wildfl owers and edible This handbook explains the current best management bulbs like camas. Bulbs of the native camas or wild onion practices we can use to reduce impacts on prairie lands, were harvested in great numbers and eaten as a carbohy- as well as information about restoration tools that are drate staple. Camas bulbs were traded with tribes living on specifi c to prairies of the Pacifi c Northwest. the eastern slopes of the Cascades and plains of eastern Washington. Finally, this handbook will provide details on incentive programs available to you, as a private landowner, to as- When homesteaders from the east arrived in Washington in sist with the process of restoring the prairie lands that are the 1840s, they found knee-high grasses and wildfl owers, important to you. with groves of gnarled oaks interspersed within the vast prairie lands. The prairies supported elk, deer, hawks, larks, butterfl ies, and a profusion of berries and flowering plants. Today, our native prairies are one of the most endangered Learn more! ecosystems in the United States. What was once over Throughout the handbook, you 150,000 acres of prairie in the Northwest has been reduced will fi nd words that are in bold by 90 percent. Our remaining prairies face many continued and italicized. These terms are threats, such as conversion for agriculture or land devel- defi ned in the Glossary section opment, invasive weeds, overgrazing, and a lack of the of this handbook. periodic fi res that once maintained these areas as grass- lands. With only a fragment of the original prairie and oak woodland habitats protected in parks or reserves, private landowners hold the key to maintaining this important natural legacy. 2 | Prairie Landowner Guide for Western Washington Who Should Use this Handbook? This handbook is intended for people who own, live, work The appendices of this handbook provide resources for on, or manage prairie lands in western Washington. Chap- landowners, such as sources for native plants, methods ters 2, 3, and 4 provide information that anyone can use for control of common weed species, and references for to plan and implement a prairie restoration project. Later more information about prairies, funding and incentive chapters of the handbook are tailored to certain types of programs. prairie lands: We have developed this handbook to inspire landown- • Chapter 5 applies specifi cally to residential lands. Hom- ers to actively manage their prairie lands and to provide eowners will fi nd information about how to incorporate guidance in creating a work plan to protect and restore prairie plants into a garden setting, and how to enhance prairies on their lands. Whether you own a small lot or small or remnant prairie areas. manage hundreds of acres, the goal is to create and implement a plan that best fi ts your needs as a landowner, • Chapter 6 is specifi c to working lands: areas that a plan that you can implement and sustain to maintain the produce food or fi ber, such as croplands, grazing legacy of nature and history that is a western Washington lands, pastures, rangelands, and forested lands. Land prairie. managers will fi nd tools to continue these uses while incorporating the historic use or the cultural perspective of native prairies. PHOTO BY: ESA Adolfson PHOTO BY: Chapter 1: Introduction | 3 A P T E C2H R Getting to Know Prairies Where Are Prairies Found? Some prairies in western Washington are well known and Given these altered conditions, scientists have turned hard to miss. The distinctive topography of the Mima to a variety of tools to map areas of western Washing- Mounds or fi elds of camas in bloom are familiar icons of lo- ton that likely supported native prairies before European cal prairies. However, much of what was once prairie land is settlement. One of these tools is soils mapping. The soils now diffi cult to discern. Once maintained by Native Ameri- of an area have a major infl uence on the plants that can cans through periodic burning, the open prairies are now of- grow there and what species of wildlife may be present. ten invaded by non-native vegetation. Throughout the range Soils in the prairies of western Washington were formed of historic prairie, fi re suppression has allowed fast-growing by retreating glaciers and tend to be gravelly, excessively native trees such as Douglas-fi r to become established. well-drained, and nutrient poor. In addition to fi re suppression and resulting invasion of trees This chapter discusses prairie soils of western Washing- and weedy species, most historic prairies in our region have ton and provides maps of where these soils are concen- been altered in other ways—through development, grazing, trated. Wet prairies and oak woodlands (a type of habitat raising of crops, recreation, or other activities.
Recommended publications
  • A News and Events Diary from Wildlife and Conservation Groups in the Ipswich Area
    Pantaloon Bee – see page 9 © Matt Garnham September - December 2018 A news and events Produced by the diary from wildlife and conservation groups in the Ipswich area BlueSnippets alien found White Admiral Lydia Woods in town Richard Stewart On the afternoon of Friday June 22nd my wife and I were walking down Westerfield Road in Ipswich and just past the gate into Christchurch Park we saw a white admiral on the pavement. It appeared to be a newly emerged While walking through Kiln Meadow on a warm adult but had probably been caught morning in July, I was more than a little surprised to in a vehicle slipstream. I cupped my hands around it, walked across the be confronted with a bright flash of blue! road and released the butterfly over the park railings. This was one of the On closer inspection I discovered a rather battered looking blue morpho butterfly new species I predicted for the park resting on the ground - not something you’d expect to see in Suffolk. These butterflies in future years as it has steadily been are generally found in Central and South America, although they are a popular choice colonising towards Ipswich. One was for butterfly houses – it’s likely this one escaped from the butterfly house situated at seen and photographed in The Dales Jimmy’s Farm. After taking some photos of this blue alien, I left the butterfly resting in a in 2015. With this in mind more patch of bindweed. While this was a lovely sight to see, hopefully it won’t be a regular honeysuckle, the larval food plant, occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
    Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 199 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 200 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 201 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 202 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan ) New Flora of the British IslesSecond Ed Epilobium angustifolium Senecio jacobaea), Galium aparine Rumex obtusifoliusCirsium spp.) Ulmus glabra Quercus spp 203 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis Fig Handbook for Phase 1 habitat survey − a technique for environmental audit. New Flora of the British Isles 204 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 205 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 206 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 207 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Key Points for Sustainable Management of Northern Great Plains Grasslands
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Natural Resource Management Faculty Publications Department of Natural Resource Management 2019 Looking to the Future: Key Points for Sustainable Management of Northern Great Plains Grasslands Lora B. Perkins Marissa Ahlering Diane L. Larson Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/nrm_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons REVIEW ARTICLE Looking to the future: key points for sustainable management of northern Great Plains grasslands Lora B. Perkins1,2 , Marissa Ahlering3, Diane L. Larson4 The grasslands of the northern Great Plains (NGP) region of North America are considered endangered ecosystems and priority conservation areas yet have great ecological and economic importance. Grasslands in the NGP are no longer self-regulating adaptive systems. The challenges to these grasslands are widespread and serious (e.g. climate change, invasive species, fragmentation, altered disturbance regimes, and anthropogenic chemical loads). Because the challenges facing the region are dynamic, complex, and persistent, a paradigm shift in how we approach restoration and management of the grasslands in the NGP is imperative. The goal of this article is to highlight four key points for land managers and restoration practitioners to consider when planning management or restoration actions. First, we discuss the appropriateness of using historical fidelity as a restoration or management target because of changing climate, widespread pervasiveness of invasive species, the high level of fragmentation, and altered disturbance regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a FRPA Regulation Species Recommended for FSP
    APPENDIX A FRPA Regulation Species Recommended for FSP Inclusion by Former Coastal Forest District & BEC Zone FRPA Species of Concern / Applicable BEC Zone Former Forest District (and specific areas of concern within BEC zone) B Campbell River 1. Dalmatian toadflax Linaria dalmatica / CDF B 2. Diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa / CDF 3. Giant knotweed Polygonum sachalinense / CDF, CWH, MH 4. Gorse Ulex europaeus / CDF 5. Hoary alyssum Berteroa incana / CDF 6. Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum / CDF, CWH, MH 7. Leafy spurgeB Euphorbia esula / CDF 8. Meadow hawkweed Hieracium pilosella / CDF 9. Meadow knapweedB Centaurea pratensis / CDF & CWH (near Comox) 10. Orange hawkweed Hieracium aurantiacum / CWH 11. Purple loosestrifeB Lythrum salicaria / CDF & CWH (near Comox & Campbell River) 12. Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius / CDF, CWH & MH 13. Spotted knapweedB Centaurea maculosa / CDF 14. Sulphur cinquefoil Potentilla recta / CDF 15. Tansy ragwortBSenecio jacobaea / CDF & CWH (near Sayward) 16.Yellow Iris Iris pseudacorus / CDF & CWH (near Comox and Campbell River) Chilliwack 1. Baby's breath Gypsophila paniculata / IDF (between Lillooet & Boston Bar) 2. Blueweed Echium vulgare / IDF & CWH 3. Dalmatian toadflaxBLinaria dalmatica / IDF 4. Diffuse knapweedB Centaurea diffusa / IDF 5. Giant knotweed Polygonum sachalinense / CWH, MH 6. Hoary alyssum Berteroa incana / IDF 7. Hound's-tongueB Cynoglossum officinale / IDF (between Lytton & Boston Bar) 8. Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum / CWH, MH 9. Leafy spurgeB Euphorbia esula / IDF 10. Meadow hawkweed Hieracium pilosella / IDF & CWH 11. Orange hawkweed Hieracium aurantiacum / IDF & CWH 12. Purple loosestrifeB Lythrum salicaria / CDF & CWH (near Fraser Valley) 13. Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius / CWH & MH 14. Spotted knapweedB Centaurea maculosa / IDF 15. Sulphur cinquefoil Potentilla recta / IDF 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Suitable Plants City of Mccall
    Native or Suitable Plants City of McCall The following list of plants is presented to assist the developer, business owner, or homeowner in selecting plants for landscaping. The list is by no means complete, but is a recommended selection of plants which are either native or have been successfully introduced to our area. Successful landscaping, however, requires much more than just the selection of plants. Unless you have some experience, it is suggested than you employ the services of a trained or otherwise experienced landscaper, arborist, or forester. For best results it is recommended that careful consideration be made in purchasing the plants from the local nurseries (i.e. Cascade, McCall, and New Meadows). Plants brought in from the Treasure Valley may not survive our local weather conditions, microsites, and higher elevations. Timing can also be a serious consideration as the plants may have already broken dormancy and can be damaged by our late frosts. Appendix B SELECTED IDAHO NATIVE PLANTS SUITABLE FOR VALLEY COUNTY GROWING CONDITIONS Trees & Shrubs Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Shrub or small tree 15-20' tall, Pacific Northwest native. Bright scarlet-orange fall foliage. Excellent ornamental. Alnus incana (Mountain Alder). A large shrub, useful for mid to high elevation riparian plantings. Good plant for stream bank shelter and stabilization. Nitrogen fixing root system. Alnus sinuata (Sitka Alder). A shrub, 6-1 5' tall. Grows well on moist slopes or stream banks. Excellent shrub for erosion control and riparian restoration. Nitrogen fixing root system. Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry). One of the earlier shrubs to blossom out in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • VMG Kentucky Bluegrass Revised 2017
    Vol.1, No. 28 (Rev.). Approved 05/26/2017 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) SPECIES CHARACTER DESCRIPTION Kentucky bluegrass is a perennial grass that may form a dense mat of short creeping rhizomes. Leaves are usually smooth, 0.08-0.4 inches (2-9 mm) wide, up to 15.8 inches (40 cm) long, flat to folded, with a boat-shaped tip. Sheaths surrounding the flowering stalk are rounded or flattened with ligules 0.03-0.2 inches (1-5 mm) long. Stems are numerous in a tuft and grow 12-36 inches (30-91 cm) high. The erect panicles are up to 36 inches (1 m) tall and pyramidal at top with distinct whorls of branches in the inflorescence. Flowers occur in oval spikelets from 0.1-0.2 inches (3-6 mm long) with three to six individual flowers in each spikelet. Bluegrasses (the genus Poa) are distinguished by their flat leaf blades, 2-6 flowered panicles, 1-3 nerved glumes (sterile scales at the base of a spikelet) and a tuft of cobwebby hairs at the base of the 5-nerved lemmas (small scales at the base of a floret). Grasses, in general, are fairly difficult to identify, and Kentucky bluegrass should be accurately identified before attempting any control measures. If identification of the species is in doubt, the plant's identity should be confirmed by a knowledgeable individual and/or by consulting appropriate manuals or keys. DISTRIBUTION Kentucky bluegrass occurs throughout Canada and south to Mexico. It is widespread in the United States, occurring in all 50 states, but is less common in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County, Washington State
    Be Here Snohomish County, Washington State Sophisticated research and manufacturing technologies with proximity to a major urban center. We work for business, yours should Be Here. ADVOCATE • DEVELOP • CONNECT CENTER OF INNOVATION Our diverse industrial base, technological prowess, and strategic location Snohomish position Snohomish County at the center of innovation. County Global Center for Aerospace and Advanced Manufacturing Snohomish County is home to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, their new $1 billion Composite Wing Center, and 200+ companies that help produce 747, 767, 777/X, and 787 aircraft. Key companies in Snohomish County include Crane, Korry Seattle, WA Electronics, MTorres, Collins Aerospace, Senior plc, Panasonic and Safran. Designated by the State as the Center of its Medical Device Industry Two international leaders in ultrasound, Philips and Fujifilm Sonosite, have headquarters and manufacturing here. In addition to devices, our life science cluster includes biopharmaceutical firms AGC Biologics, Seattle Genetics and Juno Therapeutics. Providence Regional Medical Center Everett gives access to 1 in 5 Jobs clinical trial opportunities at facilities throughout their 50 hospital system. in Snohomish County are associated with manufacturing Snohomish County Attracts Tech and Creative Companies Fluke Corporation (and its Fortune 500 parent, Fortive) have their headquarters and operations here, as do Zumiez (retail/clothing), Premera Blue Cross (insurance), and Funko (toys). T-Mobile, Google, Amazon and AT&T all have a significant presence as well. Microsoft, Expedia, Facebook, Nintendo, Big Fish Games and Apple are in the region. WORKFORCE TAXES & Snohomish County has the highest concentration of advanced INCENTIVES manufacturing jobs west of the Rocky Mountains. Manufacturing is 20% of our county workforce; twice the State average.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa Pratensis) DESCRIPTION: Originally from Europe (Not Kentucky), This Plant Is the Primary Component of Most Lawns
    Weed Identification and Control Sheet: www.goodoak.com/weeds Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) DESCRIPTION: Originally from Europe (not Kentucky), this plant is the primary component of most lawns. Aside from corn, this may now be the most common grass in the eastern United States due to its dominance of our human landscape. This species often escapes cultivation and can be a problematic invasive species in our natural areas. Considerable time and resources are invested into maintaining this species in residential and corporate landscapes. Irrigating lawns uses up to 30% of municipal water supplies; this waste puts our long term supply of clean fresh water at risk. Pesticides, herbicides and petro- chemical fertilizers are spread on lawns at ten times the rate they are applied to agricultural lands. As a result, lawns are the primary source of pollution in lakes, streams and groundwater in urban and suburban areas. Exhaust from mowers and trimmers cause up to 33% of air pollution in urban areas. Lastly, these low mown lawns provide no habitat for our native wildlife, and as a result urban development is a leading cause of habitat loss. IDENTIFICATION: Though most people see this plant just about every day, few people look at it closely. Since there are often other non-native species of grasses in lawns, such as fescue, a few distinct features can help you tell Kentucky bluegrass apart when necessary. When not mown off, the leaf tips look like the front end or “keel” of a boat. Only grasses in the genus Poa have this feature. Also, when Kentucky bluegrass is not mown it will develop a distinctive panicle of small, green, wind- pollinated flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD
    DDAAVVIIDD CCLLEEMMEENNTTSS EECCOOLLOOGGYY LLTTDD MERTHYR TYDFIL COUNTY BOROUGH SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION SO 00SW/2: RHYDYCAR WEST SURVEY & ASSESSMENT FOR SINC DESIGNATION May 2006 David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD Site Name: RHYDYCAR WEST Grid Ref(s): SO 045047 Site No.: SO 00SW/2 SO 033050 (W); 038053 (N); 053036 (E); 034031 (S) Status: Candidate Date: July 2002 July 2002: Provisional site; boundary identified from available Proposed Date: desk-top sources only; requires confirmation by survey. Confirmed Date: Dec 2005: Site surveyed and assessed for designation; designation boundary identified. Summary - Reasons for Selection/Interest of Site: Very extensive mosaic of ‘ffridd’ habitats and former mine spoil supporting complex of semi- upland and lowland habitats, partly contained within conifer plantation. Main components are ancient semi-natural woodland fragments, other semi-natural woodlands (mainly upland oak, Quercus sp) together with wet woodlands of alder (Alnus glutinosa), wet heathland, dry heathland, marshy grassland and semi-improved neutral grasslands. Also there are some bracken slopes, scrub, small ponds, streams and sections of dismantled railway. There are areas of semi- improved acid grasslands to the south especially. The habitats intergrade to form a complex mosaic, and may therefore also include some small areas of improved or low diversity semi- improved grassland, but any such areas are a very minor component. Great crested newt occurs in small pools within the SINC, and noctule and pipistrelle bats have both been recorded. Water vole may occur and a small badger sett is present.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Requirements and Landscape-Level Factors Influencing
    The Journal of Wildlife Management 81(7):1298–1307; 2017; DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21286 Research Article Area Requirements and Landscape-Level Factors Influencing Shrubland Birds H. PATRICK ROBERTS,1 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 204 Holdsworth Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA DAVID I. KING, U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station, University of Massachusetts, 201 Holdsworth Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA ABSTRACT Declines in populations of birds that breed in disturbance-dependent early-successional forest have largely been ascribed to habitat loss. Clearcutting is an efficient and effective means for creating early- successional vegetation; however, negative public perceptions of clearcutting and the small parcel size typical of private forested land in much of the eastern United States make this practice impractical in many situations. Group selection harvests, where groups of adjacent trees are removed from a mature forest matrix, may be more acceptable to the public and could provide habitat for shrubland birds. Although some shrubland bird species that occupy clearcuts are scarce or absent from smaller patches created by group selection, some of these smaller patches support shrubland species of conservation concern. The specific factors affecting shrubland bird occupancy of these smaller patches, such as habitat structure, patch area, and landscape context, are poorly understood. We sampled birds in forest openings ranging 0.02–1.29 ha to identify species-specific minimum-area habitat requirements and other factors affecting shrubland birds. We modeled bird occurrence in relation to microhabitat-, patch-, and landscape-level variables using occupancy models. The minimum-area requirements for black-and-white warblers (Mniotilta varia), common yellowthroats (Geothlypis trichas), chestnut-sided warblers (Setophaga pensylvanica), eastern towhees (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), and gray catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis)were0.23 ha, whereas indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea) and prairie warblers (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No 250 July 2018
    Published by RUGBY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY www.rugbynaturalhistory.org.uk PRESIDENT – Dr P Reeve Newsletter No 250 July 2018 Contents this edition ~Minibus trip: Rutland Water (book now!) ~News of members ~Summer field visit reports ~ Winter indoor meetings: dates for your diary ~Data protection information ~Current committee members (with contact information) Appendices included: species lists for Grove Hill, Snitterfield Bushes, Dunchurch Meadows, Stockton Cutting and Tasker’s Meadow Photos © Paul Hodges: cowslip carpet; thimble morel; semi-free morel at Grove Hill reserve Minibus trip? Speak up now! Rutland Water. Would you like to travel by minibus to our Rutland Water field visit on Thursday 6 September? Several members requested that we arrange this and David Knapp is willing to do so as long as there is sufficient interest - at least sixteen people would be 1 needed. The cost of a minibus would be £20 per person. The departure/return point would, as usual, be St Mark’s Church car park in Bilton, with additional pick up/drop off points in Long Itchington and Marton. The proposed return visit to Oxford Natural History Museum was cancelled because there were not enough people to make it viable. This is therefore now the FINAL CALL (!) for Rutland Water. If you would be interested in travelling by minibus, please let David know by Wednesday 1 August 2018 and he will then get back to you with further details. Tel. 01788 817346 or e:mail [email protected] News of members Most members will already know that Frank Ollerenshaw died in May. Nine of us attended his funeral, where we learned that he had served in young people’s organisations, as well as being a member both of the society and of Warwickshire Wildlife Trust and having many other interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Survey and Inventory
    BAINBRIDGE ISLAND HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AND INVENTORY Prepared for: City of Bainbridge Island November 2, 2017 146 N Canal St, Suite 111 • Seattle, WA 98103 • www.confenv.com This page intentionally left blank for double‐sided printing BAINBRIDGE ISLAND HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AND INVENTORY DAHP PROJECT NUMBER 2017-05-03597 Prepared for: City of Bainbridge Island 280 Madison Avenue N. Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Attn: Heather Wright, Senior Planner Authored by: Beth Dodrill and Connie Walker Gray Confluence Environmental Company November 2, 2017 146 N Canal St, Suite 111 • Seattle, WA 98103 • www.confenv.com This page intentionally left blank for double‐sided printing BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SURVEY AND INVENTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 HISTORIC OVERVIEW AND ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................ 3 2.1 Historic Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Predominant Architectural Styles on Bainbridge Island ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]