Australian Water Resources Assessment 2012 6.2 Key Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GENERAL FEATURES of the ECOLOGY and BIOGEOGRAPHY of TASMANIAN SUBTIDAL ROCKY SHORE COMMUNITIES by G.J
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 118, 1984 (ms. received 24.11.1984) GENERAL FEATURES OF THE ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF TASMANIAN SUBTIDAL ROCKY SHORE COMMUNITIES by G.J. Edgar Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania (with two tables, four text-figures and one plate) ABSTRACT EDGAR, G.J., 1984 (31 viii): General features of the ecology and biogeography of Tasmanian subtidal rocky shore communities. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm., 118: 173-186, pl. 1. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.118.173 ISSN 0080-4703. Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, now C.S.I.R.O., P.O. Box 20, North Beach, Western Australia. A number of subtidal benthic assemblages of plants and animals which commonly occur around the Tasmanian coast are described. These assemblages are incorporated into a gen eral scheme which relates subtidal zonation patterns to wave exposure and depth. The existence of a cool-temperate marine biogeographic province (the Maugean), centred in southern, western and eastern Tasmanian waters, is reaffirmed. The biota of the northern Tasmanian coast is considered similar to that of the Victorian coast and in cludes a large component of Flindersian (Southern Australian) species. A number of Peronian (New South Wales) species reach the Tasmanian east coast. Most of these animals probably drift to Tasmania as pelagic larvae in southward flowing currents, and may even travel further afield to New Zealand, but have difficulty surviving to maturity and spawn ing. Many Maugean plant and animal species also occur in New Zealand. INTRODUCTION A considerable number of studies describing Tasmanian intertidal communities have been reported, notably by Guiler (1952a,b, 1954), Guiler et al. -
Tas Catchment Selection.Indd
Technical Report No. 1 Selecting catchments for the retrospective study of land-use and water quality September 2007 Published September 2007 This publication is available for download as a PDF from www.landscapelogic.org.au LANDSCAPE LOGIC is a research hub under the Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities scheme, managed by the Department of Environment, Water Heritage and the Arts. It is a partnership between: • six regional organisations – the North Central, North East & Goulburn–Broken Catchment Management Authorities in Victoria and the North, South and Cradle Coast Natural Resource Management organisations in Tasmania; • five research institutions – University of Tasmania, Australian National University, RMIT University, Charles Sturt University and NORTH CENTRAL Catchment CSIRO; and Management Authority • state land management agencies in Tasmania and Victoria – the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries & Water, Forestry Tasmania and the Victorian Department of Sustainability & Environment. The purpose of Landscape Logic is to work in partnership with regional natural resource managers to develop decision-making approaches that improve the effectiveness of environmental management. Landscape Logic aims to: 1. Develop better ways to organise existing knowledge and assumptions about links between land management actions and environmental outcomes. 2. Improve our understanding of the links between land management actions and environmental outcomes through historical studies of the effects of private and public investment on water quality and native vegetation condition. Selecting catchments for the retrospective study of land-use and water quality By Bill Cotching, UTAS Summary This report describes the criteria and process use to select Tasmanian catchments in a study of the relationships between land use, land management and water quality. -
Hydro 4 Water Storage
TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation. -
Water Quality of the Pipers River
Water Quality of the Pipers River A Report Forming Part of the Requirements for State of Rivers Reporting Christopher Bobbi Land and Water Assessment Branch DPIWE. Report Series WRA 99/19 December, 1999. Executive Summary The Pipers River catchment is an area extensively used for agriculture and forestry. The catchment covers approximately 298 km2 and drains northward into Bass Strait through Weymouth. This report presents and discusses the results of a 1yr study of water quality in the catchment that was undertaken in 1998 as part of a program of ‘State of Rivers’ studies in the north-east of Tasmania. The results should also be examined in the light of other studies into hydrology, stream condition and aquatic ecology which were also undertaken concurrently and which are reported separately. Some of the major findings of this study are: ⇒ Water temperature shows a distinctive seasonal change, with minimum temperatures of 5 oC occurring during July and maximum temperatures of up to 25 oC occurring during late January. Large short-term changes can occur due to passage of cold fronts across the catchment. ⇒ Conductivity, which is an indicator of salt concentrations, tends to be highest during low summer flows but drops dramatically during and following any significant rainfall and is generally much lower during winter and spring. The ions contributing most to surface water salinity are chloride and sodium. ⇒ Turbidity levels were variable at sites where monitoring was undertaken, with clearest water occurring during the period January to May, when flows were lowest. During the high flows of winter, turbidity at some sites was significantly higher demonstrating the impact of runoff and erosion on water quality. -
1. AA FINAL AMENDED FINAL FORMAT 2 Briseis Water 5 Sept'20
Journal of Australasian Mining History, Vol. 18, October 2020 Briseis water supply scheme 1901-1910: a premium investment By KEITH PRESTON Key words: Tin mining, Tasmania, water management, hydraulic sluicing, water rights, aqueducts. t the close of the nineteenth century, mining of deep tin leads along the Ringarooma Valley of north-eastern Tasmania by means of hydraulic sluicing A was well established. In the vicinity of Derby, water supply and tailings disposal were critical factors in achieving viable operations along the Cascade Lead.1 Mines on the south bank of the Ringarooma River competed for available water from the Cascade River, that flowed through the leases of the Briseis Tin Mining Company.2 A limited water supply was also available from Main Creek to the east, but again restricted by competition from mine leases along that watercourse. Reduced summer flows usually curtailed tin production for several months as finance for the construction of storage reservoirs was generally unavailable. Figure 1: Sketch plan of the Cascade Lead showing original lease owners with subsurface features superimposed. Source: The Argus, 29 April 1902, p. 8. 134 Keith Preston On the south bank of the Ringarooma River the privately owned Krushka Brothers mine on Lease 316 dominated tin output prior to 1900, aided by a short headrace from the Cascade River that provided an adequate water supply and a river frontage that facilitated tailings disposal at minimal cost (Fig. 1).3 The adjoining mines operated by Victorian based mining companies, the New Brothers’ Home No. 1 TM Co. [NBH1 Co. hereafter] and Briseis TM Co. -
3966 Tour Op 4Col
The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places, -
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania
PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 01' THII ROYAL SOCIETY 01' TASMANIA, JOB (ISSUED JUNE, 1894.) TASMANIA: PJUl'TBD .&.T «TO XBROUBY" OJ'lPIOE, JUOQUUIE BT., HOBART. 1894. Googk A CATALOGUE OF THE MINERALS KNOWN TO OCCUR IN TASMANIA, WITH NOTES ON THEIR DISTRIBUTION• .Bv W. F. PETTERD. THE following Catalogue of the Minerals known to occur and reeortled from this Island is mainly prepared from specimen~ contained in my own collection, and in the majority of instances I have verified the identifications by careful qualitative analysis. It cannot claim any originality of research, 01' even accluac)" of detail, but as the material has been so rapidly accumulating during the past few )'ears I bave thoug-ht it well to place on record the result of my personal observation and collecting, wbich, with information ~Ieaned from authentic sources, may, I trust, at least pave tbe way for a more elaborate compilation by a more capable authority. I have purposely curtailed my remarks on the various species 80 Rs to make them as concise as possible, and to redulle the bulk of the matter. As an amateur I think I may fairly claim tbe indulgence of the professional or otber critics, for I feel sure tbat my task has been very inadequately performed in pro portion to the importance of the subjeot-one not only fraugbt with a deep scientific interest on account of tbe multitude of questions arisin~ from the occurrence and deposition of the minerals them selves, but also from the great economic results of our growing mining indu.try. My object has been more to give some inform ation on tbis subject to the general student of nature,-to point out tbe larg-e and varied field of observation open to him,- than to instruct the more advanced mineralo~ist. -
Meander River Catchment High Conservation Value Assets Descriptions Report
Meander River Catchment High Conservation Value Assets Descriptions Report Department of Primary Industries and Water Meander River Catchment: High Conservation Value Asset Descriptions Report National Water Initiative – Australian Government Water Fund Report to the Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values Project, Water Resources Division, Department of Primary Industries and Water Report 3/6 October 2007 P. E. Davies, L. Cook, T. Sloane, L. Koehnken and P. Barker Freshwater Systems and associates: Technical Advice on Water, North Barker and Associates © Department of Primary Industries and Water, October 2007 Published by: Water Resources Division Department of Primary Industries and Water GPO Box 44 Hobart Tas 7001 Telephone: (03) 6233 6328 Facsimile: (03) 6233 8749 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/water This report forms part of a series of reports produced as part of the ‘Ground-truthing and validation of the Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values (CFEV) database to support Water Management Planning’ project. Financial support contributed by the Australian Government through the National Water Initiative – Australian Government Water Fund is gratefully acknowledged. Citation: Davies, P. E., Cook, L., Sloane, T., Koehnken, L. and Barker, P. (2007). Meander River Catchment: High Conservation Value Assets Descriptions Report. Report to the Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values Project. Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania. ISBN: 9780724664375 Copyright All material published in the report by the Department of Primary Industries and Water, as an agent of the Crown, is protected by the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth). Other than in accordance with the provisions of the Act, or as otherwise expressly provided, a person must not reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit any such material without first obtaining the written permission of the Department of Primary Industries and Water. -
Meander River Anglers Access
EDITION 6 Access Rules Foot Access for anglers has been provided by the Meander River goodwill of landowners and is a privilege not a right. If access is not specifically identified then you must ask for permission or you may be trespassing which Anglers is a criminal offence. Please respect private property and abide by the access rules and code of conduct to ensure the continued use of these areas. Access • Poppy crops are strictly enforced licensed areas. REGION: NORTH WEST Anglers may walk around the perimeter of crops but must not enter into or interfere with poppy crops • Do not stray into paddocks or trample crops • Avoid disturbing stock • Do not climb on fences • Leave gates as you find them • Do not cut down or deface trees for wattle grubs • Report any unusual fish captures or algal sightings to the Inland Fisheries Service • Report illegal activities to Bushwatch 1800 333 000 Warning SPECIAL CLOSURE In support of the World Fly Fishing Championships 2019 the Meander River downstream from the Huntsman Lake dam to Barretts Bridge, Longridge Road (C166) will be closed to recreational fishing from midnight on Sunday 24 November to midnight on Friday 6 December 2019 inclusive. ANGLING DEEP REGULATIONS WATER We regret any inconvenience and thankyou for your cooperation. APPLY CONTACT DETAILS 17 Back River Road, STRONG ELECTRIC CURRENTS FENCE New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: 1300 INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au Sam Shelley STEEP BANKS CATTLE BL11553 Inland Fisheries Service Getting There Angling Regulations the river more accessible for shore based angling. Bait, lure and fly fishing will be rewarded throughout the season. -
A Revision of the Tasmanian Freshwater Crayfish Genus Astacopsis Huxley (Decapoda: Parastacidae)
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 126, 1992 91 A REVISION OF THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER CRAYFISH GENUS ASTACOPSIS HUXLEY (DECAPODA: PARASTACIDAE). by Premek Hamr (with three text-figures) HAMR, P., 1992 (31 :x): A revision of the Tasmanian freshwater crayfish genus Astacopsis Huxley (Dccapoda: ·Parastacidae). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 126: 91-94. ISSN 0080-4703. 28 Undercliffe Ave, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3HI, Canada: formerly Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania. During a broad study of the biology of the freshwater in rhe Tasmanian genus fWO distinct forms of Astacopsis franklinii were recognised. These "forms" were found to diffcr in terms of their general morphology and distribution. As a result, the taxonomy of Astacopsis has been revised to re-establish the three species originally described by Ellen Clark. Astacopsis franklinii Gray has been divided into fWO separate species, the eastern Astacopsis franklinti and the western Astacopsis tricorn is, while the status ofArtacopsis gouldi remains unaltered. Key Words: Astacopsis, Tasmania, distribution, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION to vary greatly in size and spininess. In their re-examination of the various morphological characters, Swain et al. (1982) The members of the genus Astacopsis, which include the found that the variation in spininess and size had a world's largest freshwater crayfish (and therefore invertebrate) geographical basis. It will be shown in this study that this species, are associated with riverine and lacustrine habitats variation is, in fact, at least partly due to the occurrence of throughout Tasmania (Swain et al. 1982). Taxonomically two distinct forms within A. franklinii, and it is further and ecologically their closest relatives are the crayfishes of the proposed that these two forms should be treated as two genera Euastacus and Astacoides (Hobbs 1987,1988, Riek separate species. -
Freshwater Systems Between 1997 and 2002, with the Addition of New Observations
Status of Trout-free Waters in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Report to Department of Primary Industries, and Water, Hobart. PE Davies, LSJ Cook, WR Robinson, T Sloane June 2009 82 Waimea Ave, Sandy Bay, FFrreesshhwwaatteerr Tasmania Australia 7005 Ph/Fax: 03 62254660 SSyysstteemmss [email protected] Aquatiic Enviironmentall Consulltiing Serviice Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Aims and Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Aims ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Alien fish in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area .................................................. 6 1.3 Brown trout ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Value of trout-free waters ........................................................................................................ 8 2. Mapping the Distribution of Trout-free Waters ........................................................................... 10 2.1 Fish distribution database ...................................................................................................... -
Three NRM Regions of Tasmania Local Council
Three NRM Regions of Local Council NRM JANUARY 2013 Issue 5 Tasmania lamorgan Spring Bay Council takes Natural Resource Management and GLAMORGAN SPRING BAY COUNCIL G asmania is home to associated legislative obligations seriously. C some of the most lush The NRM Unit of Council is led by a full time manager and C T natural environments, from supported by a committed and highly skilled team. GLAMORGAN SPRING BAY COUNCIL rich agricultural land to rugged The control of weeds is a responsibility that is shared by both mountainous areas. NORTH Council’s Works Crew and NRM Unit, sharing equipment, WEST South NORTH knowledge and resources to achieve a co-ordinated and cost- Catchments to Coast Newsletter The South region of Tasmania effective outcome. “Working Together to look after Our Rivers & Our Community” covers 25 000 sq km and The following are utilised by Council and available to hire*: supports 232 000 people (about SOUTH Wash Down Unit – to clean machinery between sites to half Tasmania’s population) reduce spreading weeds in the municipalities of Hobart City, Huon Valley, Brighton, Central Quik Spray Unit – for larger weed control tasks, 600 litre Highlands, Clarence City, Derwent tank and two spray leads Valley, Glamorgan-Spring Bay, Glenorchy City, Please contact Amanda on 0488 573 175 Kingborough, Sorell, South Midlands and Tasman. Natural Resource Management (NRM) * Subject to conditions The region is characterised by dramatic landforms and rich atural resource management is about taking care of natural scenery. Some features of the region include: Nresources, with a particular focus on how the management affects the quality of life for both present and future generations.