DOCSLIB.ORG

Twelve Testable Hypotheses on the Geobiology of Weathering 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twelve Testable Hypotheses on the Geobiology of Weathering 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 S Geobiology (2010) DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00264.x 1 2 3 Twelve testable hypotheses on the geobiology of weathering 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 S. L. BRANTLEY, J. P. MEGONIGAL, F. N. SCATENA, Z. BALOGH-BRUNSTAD, R. T. BARNES, 6 M. A. BRUNS,6 P. VAN CAPPELLEN,7 K. DONTSOVA,8 H. HARTNETT,9 T. HARTSHORN,10 7 A. HEIMSATH,11 E. HERNDON,1 L. JIN,1 C. K. KELLER,12 J. R. LEAKE,13 W. H. MCDOWELL,14 8 F. C. MEINZER,15 T. J. MOZDZER,2 S. PETSCH,16 J. PETT-RIDGE,17 K. S. PREGITZER,18 P. RAY- 9 19 20 21 2 22 23 MOND, C. S. RIEBE, K. SHUMAKER, A. SUTTON-GRIER, R. WALTER AND K. YOO 10 1 11 Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 2 12 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA 3 13 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 4 14 Hartwick College, Oneonta, NY, USA 5 15 2 University of Colorado, 3215 Marine Street, E127, Boulder, CO, USA 6Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 16 7 17 School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA 8Biosphere 2 Earthscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 18 9School of Earth and Space Exploration, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 19 10Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA 20 11School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 21 12School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA 22 13Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 23 14Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, UK 24 15USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA 25 16Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA 26 17Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA 27 3 18Dean and Thomas E. Reveley Professor, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA 28 19Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA 29 20Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA 30 21College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, and Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, The University of West 31 Alabama, Livingston, AL, USA 32 22Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, USA 23 33 Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA 34 35 ABSTRACT 36 37 38 Critical Zone (CZ) research investigates the chemical, physical, and biological processes that modulate the Earth’s 39 surface. Here, we advance 12 hypotheses that must be tested to improve our understanding of the CZ: (1) Solar- 40 to-chemical conversion of energy by plants regulates flows of carbon, water, and nutrients through plant-microbe 41 soil networks, thereby controlling the location and extent of biological weathering. (2) Biological stoichiometry 42 drives changes in mineral stoichiometry and distribution. (3) On landscapes experiencing little erosion, biology 43 drives weathering during initial succession, whereas weathering drives biology over the long term. (4) In eroding 44 landscapes, weathering-front advance is coupled to surface denudation via biotic processes. (5) Biology shapes 45 the topography of the Critical Zone. (6) The impact of climatic forcing on denudation rates can be predicted from 46 models incorporating biogeochemical reaction rates and geomorphological transport laws. (7) Rising global tem- 47 peratures will increase carbon losses from the Critical Zone. (8) Rising atmospheric PCO2 will increase rates and 48 extents of mineral weathering in soils. (9) Riverine solute fluxes will respond to changes in climate primarily due to 49 changes in water fluxes and secondarily through changes in biologically mediated weathering. (10) Land use 50 change will impact Critical Zone processes and exports more than climate change. (11) In many severely altered 51 settings, restoration of hydrological processes is possible in decades or less, whereas restoration of biodiversity 52 and biogeochemical processes requires longer timescales. (12) Biogeochemical properties impart thresholds or tip- 53 ping points beyond which rapid and irreversible losses of ecosystem health, function, and services can occur. 54 55 Received 12 May 2010; accepted 29 October 2010 56 4 Corresponding author: S. L. Brantley. Tel.: XXX; fax: XXX; e-mail: [email protected] Ó 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 GBI 264 Dispatch: 24.11.10 Journal: GBI CE: Shantha Journal Name Manuscript No. B Author Received: No. of pages: 26 PE: Farhath 2 S. L. BRANTLEY et al. 1 Although some of the hypotheses have been implicit in scien- 5 INTRODUCTION 2 tific research conducted since the late 1800s, we argue that 3 The impact of humans on the Earth’s atmosphere, water, sedi- new analytical, modeling, and field opportunities now allow 4 ments, soil, and biota is thought to be of such magnitude that advances that can test these hypotheses over the next decade. 5 a new geological epoch – the Anthropocene – has been 6 proposed (Crutzen, 2002; Zalzsiewicz et al., 2008). The pace 7 EARLY DISCUSSIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF of anthropogenic change threatens sustainable use of soil and 8 BIOLOGY ON WEATHERING AND EROSION water, and impairs critical ecosystem services (Vitousek et al., 9 1997; DeFries & Eshleman, 2004; McNeil & Winiwarter, Understanding how biology interacts with earth materials to 10 2004; Foley et al., 2005; Wilkinson, 2005; Wilkinson & form the CZ has long been a subject of curiosity, scientific 11 12 McElroy, 2007; Holdren, 2008; Mann & Kump, 2008). inquiry, and social necessity. Historically, numerous proposals 13 Predicting changes in earth resources requires quantitative were advanced to explain weathering, the process that breaks 14 models to forecast – Earthcast – the behavior of the zone down and solubilizes rock components, leaving residual soil 15 extending from the vegetation canopy to groundwater (Bach- minerals and exporting solutes. Some of these early ideas 16 let et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2003; Steefel et al., 2005; Qu & match our current understanding; for example, in the early 17 Duffy, 2007; Minasny et al., 2008; Godde´ris et al., 2009; to mid-1800s, the decomposition of igneous rocks was 18 Rasmussen et al., 2010). This realm, where rocks meet life, attributed to the reactivity of water and carbonic acid (Four- 19 has been named the Critical Zone (CZ; US National Research net, 1833; Hartt, 1853) and landscape evolution was thought 20 Council Committee on Basic Research Opportunities in the to be influenced strongly by the production of physically 21 Earth Sciences, 2001). Within the CZ, biota – including mobile soils (Gilbert, 1877, 1909). Furthermore, very early 22 humans – interact with earth processes to define the chemis- on, the role of vegetation was noted: for example, Belt (1874) 23 try, texture, and topography of our surface habitat through wrote that ‘the percolation through rocks of rain water 24 weathering, element cycling, and erosion. charged with a little acid from decomposing vegetation’ accel- 25 To describe the behavior of a system as multifaceted as the erated weathering. In roughly the same time period, Charles 26 CZ, Earthcasting models need to be developed and parame- Darwin studied the effects of earthworms on soils, concluding 27 terized from observations of the atmosphere, water, surface that ‘… all the vegetable mold over the whole country has 28 Earth materials, and biota, made over a range of spatial and passed many times through, and will again pass many times 29 temporal scales. It is not sufficient, for example, to focus only through, the intestinal canals of worms’ (Darwin, 1881). By 30 on rocks at depth if the goal is to solve problems related to the 1880s, the concept of soils as natural systems that are gov- 31 human-land-air-water interactions. Likewise, if the goal is to erned by the interaction of climate, living matter, parent mate- 32 understand the long-term implications of climate change, it is rial, relief, and time had been developed (Dokuchaev, 1883). 33 not sufficient to measure the short-term responses of vegeta- Perhaps the modern era of biota-weathering research began 34 tion, because nonlinear, highly complex responses can emerge in the latter half of the 1900s as researchers began to explore 35 36 over the long term, in strong contrast to more predictable, the role of microbial communities in weathering of historic 37 shorter-term linear responses (Swetnam et al., 1999; Gunder- stone buildings (Ehrlich, 1990; Krumbein et al., 1991). 38 son, 2000; Chadwick & Chorover, 2001; Bachlet et al., Today, a wide variety of researchers from many disciplines are 39 2003). One of the best time-integrated records of the CZ is focusing on the relationships between biota and weathering 40 the soil itself: soil horizons, thicknesses, texture, structure, and erosion. Such efforts now focus on quantifying both the 41 composition, biological activity and their spatial patterns in importance of microbial activity and plants in elemental 42 landscapes integrate and record the flow of material, changes cycling and rock weathering in natural systems (e.g. Banfield 43 in climatic and tectonic forcing, and the influence of humans & Nealson, 1997; Berner et al., 2004). Furthermore, 44 and other biota on the CZ (Dokuchaev, 1883; Jenny, 1980; researchers are also modeling the effects of fauna on weather- 45 Yaalon, 1983; Retallack, 1990; Richter & Markewitz, 2001). ing and erosion (e.g. Gabet et al., 2003). Recent work on 46 Indeed, humans ultimately depend on weathering and erosion nutrient cycling and material flows within ecosystems also 47 processes to maintain the natural resources underlying society acknowledges the importance of rock weathering in structur- 48 and ecosystems (McNeil & Winiwarter, 2004; Montgomery, ing ecosystems (Banfield & Nealson, 1997; Buss et al., 2005; 49 2007).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Geology
    FEBRUARY 2007 PRIMEFACT 563 (REPLACES MINFACT 60) History of geology Mineral Resources Early humans needed a knowledge of simple geology to enable them to select the most suitable rock types both for axe-heads and knives and for the ornamental stones they used in worship. In the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, about 5000 to 2500 BC, flint was mined in the areas which are now Belgium, Sweden, France, Portugal and Britain. While Stone Age cultures persisted in Britain until after 2000 BC, in the Middle East people began to mine useful minerals such as iron ore, tin, clay, gold and copper as early as 4000 BC. Smelting techniques were developed to make the manufacture of metal tools possible. Copper was probably the earliest metal to be smelted, that is, extracted from its ore by melting. Copper is obtained easily by reducing the green copper carbonate mineral malachite, itself regarded as a precious stone. From 4000 BC on, the use of clay for brick-making became widespread. The Reverend William Branwhite Clarke (1798-1878), smelting of iron ore for making of tools and the ‘father’ of geology in New South Wales weapons began in Asia Minor at about 1300 BC but did not become common in Western Europe until Aristotle believed volcanic eruptions and nearly 500 BC. earthquakes were caused by violent winds escaping from the interior of the earth. Since earlier writers had ascribed these phenomena to The classical period supernatural causes, Aristotle's belief was a By recognising important surface processes at marked step forward. Eratosthenes, a librarian at work, the Greek, Arabic and Roman civilisations Alexandria at about 200 BC, made surprisingly contributed to the growth of knowledge about the accurate measurements of the circumference of earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology in Washington, Volume I Washington Diviaion of Geology and Euth Resources Bulletin 78
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY IN WASHINGTON Volume I RICHARD W. GALSTER, Chairman Centennial Volume Committee Washington State Section, Association of Engineering Geologists WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES BULLETIN 78 1989 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Section of the A~ociation or Engineering Geologists ''WNatural ASHINGTON STATE Resources DEPARTMENT OF Brian Boyle • Commlssloner 01 Public Lands Ari Stearns - Sup,,rvuor Division of Geology and Earth Resources Raymond LcumanJs. Slate Geologist The use of brand or trade names in this publication is for pur­ poses of identification only and does not constitute endorsement by the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources or the Association of Engineering Geologists. This report is for sale (as the set of two volumes only) by: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Mail Stop PY-12 Olympia, WA 98504 Price $ 27.83 Tax 2.17 Total $ 30.00 Mail orders must be prepaid; please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks or money orders payable to the Department of Natural Resources. This publication is printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. ii VOLUME I DEDICATION . ................ .. .. ...... ............ .......................... X FOREWORD ........... .. ............ ................... ..... ................. xii LIST OF AUTHORS ............................................................. xiv INTRODUCTION Engineering Geology in Washington: Introduction Richard W. Galster, Howard A. Coombs, and Howard H. Waldron ................... 3 PART I: ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ITS PRACTICE IN WASHINGTON Geologic Factors Affecting Engineered Facilities Richard W. Galster, Chapter Editor Geologic Factors Affecting Engineered Facilities: Introduction Richard W. Galster ................. ... ...................................... 17 Geotechnical Properties of Geologic Materials Jon W. Koloski, Sigmund D. Schwarz, and Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonostratigraphic Succession and Development of the Finnmarkian Nappe Sequence, North Norway K
    Tectonostratigraphic Succession and Development of the Finnmarkian Nappe Sequence, North Norway K. B. ZWAAN & D. ROBERTS Zwaan, K. B. & Roberts, D. 1978: Tectonostratigraphic succession and devel opment of the Finnmarkian nappe sequence, North Norway. Norges geol. Unders. 343, 53-71. Detailed investigations of the Finnmarkian nappe sequence within the 1:250 000 map-sheets 'Hammerfest', 'Nordreisa' and 'Honningsvåg' have revealed a complex construction of discrete nappes, sub-nappes and minor thrust slices. In the Kalak (Reisa) Nappe Complex the nappes are composed not only of the übiquitous Vendian to Cambrian lithostratigraphy but also of proven (dated) or suspected, older, Precambrian, high-grade gneissic/amphibolitic units and slices of Raipas carbonates and volcanites. In places, thick sequences of gneisses and schists have been converted to blastomylonites and locally ultramylonites, mainly during the first two of four principal deformation episodes. On a regional scale, major Dj folds are present in northwesterly areas whereas further southeast a more homogeneous flattening deformation prevailed. D 2 fold structures, related to the regionally developed principal foliation, show a variable development in style and trend with fold axial rotations into a NW-SE trend related to high internal strains, noticeably towards the lower parts of the nappe units. These deformations were wholly Finnmarkian (late Cambrian - early Ordovician). Nappe translation, linked to D 2, diminished in magnitude towards the northeast. Later deformation episodes include imbrication structures on all scales which can be shown to relate to the thrusting of higher nappes containing Ordo-Silurian stratigraphies. These date to late Silurian time. The Silurian emplaced nappes continue southwards into the well-documented nappe complexes of Nordland and Trøndelag.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Guide to Stone Mountain Park
    GEOLOGIC GUIDE TO STONE MOUNTAIN PARK by Robert L. Atkins and Lisa G. Joyce Georgia Department of Natural Resources Georgia Geologic Survey GEOLOGIC GUIDE 4 Common Misconceptions About Stone Mountain An average of four million people visit Stone Mountain Park each year. Very little geologic information is available to these visitors. With this lack of information, some misconceptions have developed concerning Stone Moun­ tain and the granite named after the mountain. Several of these misconcep­ tions are discussed below. MYTH 1: Stone Mountai n granite underlies half of Georgia, all of Geor­ gia, three states, seven states, etc. FACT: The Stone Mountain Granite is a relatively small unit. It extends northward to U.S. 78, southward to the park boundary, and its western contact lies within the park limits. It extends eastward towards C enterville (see Geologic Map of the Stone Mountain Area, p. 12-13). MYTH 2: Stone Mountain is the largest exposed granite outcrop in the world. FACT: Stone Mountain's size is quite inspiring. It probably is the largest granite dome east of the Mississippi River, as it rises approxi­ mately 750 feet (ft) above the surrounding topography; how­ ever, it is not the largest dome in the world. Many granite domes in the Sierras in the western United States are larger. MYTH 3: Stone Mountain is 300 million years old. FACT: The granite that forms Stone Mountain is approximately 300 million years old, but the mountain itself has only been exposed for approximately 15 million years. MYTH 4: Stone Mountain used to be a volcano. FACT: Although Stone Mountain Granite, like all other granites, is igneous in origin, it was formed quite differently from a volcano.
    [Show full text]
  • Depositional Architecture and Facies of a Complete Reef Complex Succession: a Case Study of the Permian Jiantianba Reefs, Western Hubei, South China
    minerals Article Depositional Architecture and Facies of a Complete Reef Complex Succession: A Case Study of the Permian Jiantianba Reefs, Western Hubei, South China Beichen Chen 1,2, Xinong Xie 1,* , Ihsan S. Al-Aasm 2, Feng Wu 1 and Mo Zhou 1 1 College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] (B.C.); fi[email protected] (F.W.); [email protected] (M.Z.) 2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; +86-6788-6160 Received: 26 September 2018; Accepted: 13 November 2018; Published: 16 November 2018 Abstract: The Upper Permian Changhsingian Jiantissanba reef complex is a well-known platform marginal reef, located in the western Hubei Province, China. Based on field observations and lithological analysis of the entire exposed reef complex, 12 reef facies have been distinguished according to their sedimentary components and growth fabrics. Each of the lithofacies is associated with a specific marine environment. Vertically traceable stratal patterns reveal 4 types of the lithologic associations of the Jiantianba reef: (1) heterozoan reef core association: developed in the deep marginal platform with muddy composition; (2) photozoan reef core association developed within the photic zone; (3) tide-controlled reef crest association with tidal-dominated characteristic of lithofacies in the shallow water; and (4) reef-bank association dominated by bioclastic components. The entire reef complex shows a complete reef succession revealing a function of the wave-resistant and morphological units. This study displays a complete sedimentary succession of Jiantianba reef, which provides a more accurate and comprehensive description of the reef lithofacies and a better understanding of the structure and composition of organic reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weathering and Chemical Denudation Dynamics Through Ecosystem Development and Disturbance Zsuzsanna Balogh-Brunstad,1 C
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, VOL. 22, GB1007, doi:10.1029/2007GB002957, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Chemical weathering and chemical denudation dynamics through ecosystem development and disturbance Zsuzsanna Balogh-Brunstad,1 C. Kent Keller,1 Bernard T. Bormann,2 Rachel O’Brien,3 Deane Wang,4 and Gary Hawley4 Received 8 February 2007; revised 27 August 2007; accepted 2 November 2007; published 5 February 2008. [1] Mineral weathering and chemical denudation of terrestrial environments are understood by both geochemists and ecologists to be affected by rooted plant growth. We used unique 20-year ‘‘sandbox’’ experiments to test the predictions of both disciplines regarding the influence of tree growth and harvest on chemical weathering and denudation of Ca2+,Mg2+ and K+. Results showed 3 temporal phases: 1) weathering- dominated rapid uptake of mineral nutrients with retention in trees and soil, and low denudation; 2) biocycling-dominated nutrient uptake with slower tree growth, and chemical fluxes reduced to near zero; and 3) denudation-dominated loss of nutrient reserves after harvest by disruption of biotic regulation. Overall, a red pine sandbox used and retained its resources more effectively than a reference non-vascular system. The results suggest that disturbance may be an important factor controlling chemical denudation rates. Temporal variations of the fluxes highlight difficulties of extrapolating weathering and denudation rates over long timescales. Citation: Balogh-Brunstad, Z., C. K. Keller, B. T. Bormann, R. O’Brien, D. Wang, and G. Hawley (2008), Chemical weathering and chemical denudation dynamics through ecosystem development and disturbance, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB1007, doi:10.1029/2007GB002957.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 22A Geological Laws GEOLOGIC LAWS
    Module 22A Geological Laws GEOLOGIC LAWS Geologic Laws ❑ Superposition ❑ Original Horizontality ❑ Original Continuity ❑ Uniformitarianism ❑ Cross-cutting Relationship ❑ Inclusions ❑ Faunal Succession Missing strata ❑ Unconformity ❑ Correlation Law of Superposition ❑ In an undisturbed rock sequence, the bottom layer of rock is older than the layer above it, or ❑ The younger strata at the top in an undisturbed sequence of sedimentary rocks. Law of Superposition Undisturbed strata Law of Superposition Disturbed strata Law of original horizontality ❑ Sedimentary rocks are laid down in horizontal or nearly horizontal layers, or ❑ Sedimentary strata are laid down nearly horizontally and are essentially paralel to the surface upon which they acummulate Law of Original Continuity ❑ The original continuity of water-laid sedimentary strata is terminated only by pincing out againts the basin of deposition, at the time of their deposition Law of Original Continuity Law of Original Continuity Law of Original Continuity NOTE: This law is considerable oversimplification. The last discoveries indicate that the termination is not necessarily at a basin border. Facies changes may terminated a strata. Uniformitarianism ❑ James Hutton (1726-1797) Scottish geologist developed the laws of geology ❑ Uniformitarianism is a cornerstone of geology ❑ Considered the Father of Modern Geology Uniformitarianism ❑ Uniformitarianism is based on the premise that: ➢ the physical and chemical laws of nature have remained the same through time ➢ present-day processes have operated throughout geologic time ➢ rates and intensities of geologic processes, and their results may have changed with time ❑ To interpret geologic events from evidence preserved in rocks ➢ we must first understand present-day processes and their results Uniformitarianism is a cornerstone of geology Uniformitarianism MODIFIED STATEMENT “The present is the key to the past" • The processes (plate tectonics, mountain building, erosion) we see today are believed to have been occurring since the Earth was formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology of the Quaternary Dr David Giles*, School
    Engineering Geology of the Quaternary Dr David Giles*, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Burnaby Building, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth PO1 3QL [email protected] Mr Chris Martin, BP Exploration Operating Company Ltd, Chertsey Road, Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7LN [email protected] Mr Ron Williams, Formerly Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon, CR0 2EE [email protected] * Corresponding author Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 The Early Years .................................................................................................................................... 2 The Seminal Papers – Boulton & Paul 1976, Fookes 1991 & Hutchinson 1991 ....................... 3 The 1989 Engineering Group Conference and Engineering Geology Special Publication ...... 4 The Glossop Medal Lectures ............................................................................................................. 5 Engineering Geology and Geomorphology of Glaciated and Periglaciated Terrains – Working Party Report and Engineering Geology Special Publication ......................................................... 6 Notable Case Studies .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Depositional Environment and Facies
    THESIS DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND FACIES ARCHITECTURE OF THE LOWER TO MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE RAMP SUCCESSION, ÖLAND, SOUTHERN SWEDEN Submitted by Ali Riza Cigri Department of Geosciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2014 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Sven Egenhoff John Ridley Gamze Çavdar Copyright by Ali Riza Cigri 2014 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND FACIES ARCHITECTURE OF THE LOWER TO MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE RAMP SUCCESSION, ÖLAND, SOUTHERN SWEDEN The Lower to Middle Ordovician carbonates of Öland, southern Sweden, exhibit outcrops of up to 12 m thickness and rest conformably on Cambrian black shales of the Alum Formation. Based on lithological and sedimentological characteristics, nine carbonate facies were identified within the successions that are grouped into four facies associations (FAs). FA 1 is composed of glauconite- bearing mud- to wackestone facies. FA 2 consists of three glauconite- and one glauconite- and Fe-ooid bearing mud- to packstone carbonate facies. Deposits of FA 3 are carbonate mud- to wackestone facies. FA 4 is characterized by one Fe- ooid bearing and four other mud- to packstone carbonate facies. The studied carbonate succession is subdivided into three stratigraphic units referred to as Intervals 1 to 3. Interval 1 consists of the Köpingsklint and Bruddesta Formations located at the base of the succession. Interval 2 is composed of the Horns Udde formation in the middle level of the succession, and Interval 3 is characterized by the Gillberga Formation situated at the top of the succession. ii FA 1 rocks were deposited in an offshore proximal setting, whereas FA 2 records an offshore distal setting during “starved” times.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Geological Evolution of the Maastrichtian Rocks of the Central Inlier, Jamaica
    Caribbean Journal of Earth Science, 36 (2002), 27-38. © Geological Society of Jamaica. Field guide to the geological evolution of the Maastrichtian rocks of the Central Inlier, Jamaica SIMON F. MITCHELL Department of Geography and Geology, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica ABSTRACT. This field guide describes the geology found in the central part of the Central Inlier. The oldest rocks present, the Arthurs Seat Formation represent the deposits of a volcanic arc. These are succeeded unconformably by a Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) transgressive-regressive cycle consisting of the Slippery Rock, Thomas River and Guinea Corn formations, and the Summerfield Group. The various stops show how this transgressive-regressive cycle developed. INTRODUCTION: GEOLOGY OF JAMAICA Hauterivian to Maastrichtian. The Maastrichtian rocks of the Central Inlier, which are considered in The geological history of Jamaica is conveniently this field guide, were deposited as a major divided into four phases (Draper, 1990, 1998). transgressive-regressive cycle, and illustrate the These are: 1) a Cretaceous island arc phase; 2) a interrelationships between marine carbonate Paleocene to Early Eocene phase of rifting of the deposition and active island arc volcaniclastic arc system; 3) Middle Eocene to Miocene sedimentation. deposition of carbonate platform deposits; and 4) This field guide is based on very successful field Late Cenozoic deformation leading to major uplift trips by the Geological Society of Jamaica (a record and mountain building. The Cretaceous island-arc 43 members and friends) and the Universities of phase contains rocks ranging in age from East Anglia and Edinburgh. Summerfield Group Waterworks Formation Slippery Rock, Thomas River and Guinea Corn Formations Crofts Hill Group Ginger Ridge Granodiorite Older Rocks Stratigraphic Boundary Inferred syncline axis assuming Crooked River Minor Faults 10 km displacement along Rio Trout Hall (west) Major Faults Minho Fault Guinea Corn PE N D R O R I W E V E R FA S U RIO MIN HO FAU L LT T A St.
    [Show full text]