DOCSLIB.ORG

An Introduction to Symmetries and Quantum Field Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Introduction to Symmetries and Quantum Field Theory An introduction to symmetries and quantum field theory Jean-No¨elFuchs [email protected] Updated September 10, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Requirements.............................................5 1.2 Why quantum field theory?.....................................5 1.2.1 Quantum + relativity ) QFT...............................5 1.2.2 Many-body problem in condensed matter physics.....................6 1.2.3 What is a field?........................................7 1.3 Symmetries as a leitmotiv and guiding principle..........................7 1.4 Natural units, dimensional analysis and orders of magnitude in high-energy physics......8 1.5 Logic of the course: the menu....................................9 2 Space-time symmetries and geometrical objects 11 2.1 Rotation group............................................ 11 2.1.1 O(3) and SO(3) groups................................... 11 2.1.2 Representations of SO(3).................................. 14 2.2 Lorentz group............................................. 18 2.2.1 Metric of flat spacetime................................... 18 2.2.2 Interval between two events in spacetime......................... 19 2.2.3 Isometries of spacetime: the Lorentz group........................ 19 2.2.4 Lorentz algebra........................................ 21 2.2.5 Representations of the Lorentz group............................ 24 2.3 Poincar´egroup and field representations.............................. 26 2.3.1 Spacetime translations and field representations...................... 27 2.3.2 Lorentz transformation of a scalar field.......................... 27 2.3.3 Poincar´ealgebra....................................... 28 2.3.4 Lorentz transformation of a 4-vector field......................... 28 2.3.5 Lorentz transformation of a spinor field.......................... 28 2.3.6 Summary........................................... 29 2.3.7 Representations of the Poincar´egroup on single particle states............. 29 2.4 Conclusion.............................................. 29 3 Classical fields, symmetries and conservation laws 30 3.1 Lagrangian formalism........................................ 30 3.1.1 Action and Lagrangian.................................... 30 3.1.2 Equations of motion..................................... 31 3.1.3 Conjugate field and Hamiltonian.............................. 32 3.2 Symmetries and conservation laws................................. 32 3.2.1 Symmetries of the action.................................. 32 3.2.2 Proof of Noether's theorem................................. 33 3.2.3 Explicit form of the Noether current............................ 34 3.2.4 Examples........................................... 34 1 3.3 Scalar fields and the Klein-Gordon equation............................ 37 3.3.1 Real scalar field........................................ 37 3.3.2 Complex scalar field..................................... 39 3.4 Electromagnetic field and the Maxwell equation.......................... 40 3.4.1 Covariant form of the Maxwell equations......................... 40 3.4.2 Free electromagnetic field and gauge invariance...................... 41 3.4.3 Gauge choices......................................... 43 3.4.4 Energy-momentum tensor.................................. 44 3.4.5 Coupling to matter and electric charge conservation as a consequence of gauge invariance 44 3.4.6 Gauging a symmetry..................................... 45 3.4.7 Advanced geometrical description of the electromagnetic field.............. 47 3.5 Massless spinor fields and the Weyl equations........................... 48 3.5.1 Left Weyl field, helicity and the Weyl equation...................... 48 3.5.2 Right Weyl field....................................... 49 3.6 Spinor field and the Dirac equation................................. 50 3.6.1 Parity and the Dirac Lagrangian.............................. 50 3.6.2 The Dirac equation and γ matrices............................. 50 3.6.3 Chirality operator...................................... 51 3.6.4 The Clifford algebra and different representations of the γ matrices........... 52 3.6.5 General solution of the Dirac equation: mode expansion................. 54 3.6.6 Conserved currents and charges............................... 56 3.6.7 Coupling to the electromagnetic field............................ 57 3.6.8 The αj and β matrices and the Dirac equation as the square root of the KG equation 58 3.6.9 Conclusion on the Dirac equation.............................. 59 3.6.10 Bonuses: extra material................................... 61 3.7 Conclusion on classical fields.................................... 62 4 Canonical quantization of fields 64 4.1 Real scalar fields........................................... 64 4.1.1 Quantum field........................................ 64 4.1.2 Particle interpretation and Fock space........................... 65 4.1.3 Vacuum energy and normal ordering............................ 67 4.1.4 Fock space and Bose-Einstein statistics.......................... 68 4.1.5 Summary on canonical quantization............................ 68 4.2 Complex scalar field and anti-particles............................... 69 4.3 Dirac field............................................... 70 4.3.1 Anticommutators: spinor fields are weird......................... 70 4.3.2 Fock space, Fermi-Dirac statistics and the spin-statistics relation............ 73 4.3.3 U(1) charge and anti-particles................................ 73 4.3.4 Charge conjugation...................................... 73 4.3.5 Motivation for anticommutation.............................. 74 4.3.6 Spin.............................................. 75 4.3.7 Causality and locality.................................... 75 4.4 Propagators and force as exchange of particles.......................... 75 4.4.1 What is a propagator?.................................... 75 4.4.2 Force as an exchange of virtual particles.......................... 76 4.4.3 A first glance at Feynman diagrams............................ 77 2 5 Spontaneous symmetry breaking 78 5.1 Introduction: SSB and phase transitions.............................. 78 5.2 Goldstone mechanism: SSB of a global symmetry......................... 79 5.2.1 Classical groundstate..................................... 79 5.2.2 Excitations above the groundstate............................. 80 5.2.3 What is the number of Goldstone modes?......................... 81 5.2.4 SSB of a discrete symmetry and quantum tunneling................... 82 5.3 Higgs mechanism: SSB of a gauge symmetry........................... 83 5.3.1 Superconductivity and the Meissner effect......................... 85 3 Foreword These are lecture notes for the course \Symmetries and quantum field theory" given at the master 2 \concepts fondamentaux de la physique, parcours de physique quantique" in Paris. It is work in progress and comments are most welcome. There are 12 or 13 sessions consisting of a 1.5h lecture and a 1.5h exercise session (under the supervision of Giuliano Orso, [email protected]) from September 7 to December 21, 2017. Location: between towers 55 and 56, 1st floor, room 1-02, in Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie (Jussieu, Paris) Thursday afternoon from 14:00 to 15:30 (lecture), then a 30' break and from 16:00 to 17:30 (exercise session) Recommended books: • Textbooks: The three documents that I most used to prepare these lecture notes are the following. B. Delamotte, Un soup¸conde th´eoriedes groupes: groupe des rotations et groupe de Poincar´e[1] M. Maggiore, A modern introduction to quantum field theory [2] L.H. Ryder, Quantum field theory [3] • More advanced: A. Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell [4] • Less advanced (popular science reading): A. Zee, Fearful symmetry: the search for beauty in modern physics [5] 4 Chapter 1 Introduction V. Weisskopf: \There are no real one-particle systems in nature, not even few-particle systems. The existence of virtual pairs and of pair fluctuations show that the days of fixed particle number are over." These notes serve as an introduction to relativistic quantum fiel theory (but they often discuss the connection to condensed matter physics as well). They start by discussing the symmetries of flat spacetime (Lorentz and Poincar´egroups) and constructing the natural geometrical objects of spacetime, such as scalars, vectors and spinors. Then classical field theory is reviewed before quantizing the non-interacting fields using canonical quantization. The notes end with a short presentation of spontaneous symmetry breaking. 1.1 Requirements Quantum mechanics including representations of the rotation group and the notion of spin Special relativity in covariant notation Analytical mechanics (Lagrangian, action, Euler-Lagrange equations, etc.) Notions on group theory and representations Electromagnetism (wave propagation, gauge invariance) 1.2 Why quantum field theory? 1.2.1 Quantum + relativity ) QFT Wedding of quantum physics and relativity imposes the language of quantum field theory (QFT). Indeed, quantum mechanics is formulated to describe a fixed number of particles. But this is only possible non- relativistically. The uncertainty relation ∆E∆t & ~ permits the violation of the energy conservation law (by an amount ∆E) for a short time (∆t) and relativity theory permits the conversion of energy into matter (E = mc2 states that the rest energy is given by the mass). Therefore the number of particles (even massive) can not be fixed: (virtual) particles may appear or disappear out of nothing (vacuum). We therefore
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxford Physics Department Notes on General Relativity
    Oxford Physics Department Notes on General Relativity S. Balbus 1 Recommended Texts Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology. Principles and applications of the General Theory of Relativity, (New York: John Wiley) What is now the classic reference, but lacking any physical discussions on black holes, and almost nothing on the geometrical interpretation of the equations. The author is explicit in his aversion to anything geometrical in what he views as a field theory. Alas, there is no way to make sense of equations, in any profound sense, without geometry! I also find that calculations are often performed with far too much awkwardness and unnecessary effort. Sections on physical cosmology are its main strength. To my mind, a much better pedagogical text is ... Hobson, M. P., Efstathiou, G., and Lasenby, A. N. 2006, General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) A very clear, very well-blended book, admirably covering the mathematics, physics, and astrophysics. Excellent coverage on black holes and gravitational radiation. The explanation of the geodesic equation is much more clear than in Weinberg. My favourite. (The metric has a different overall sign in this book compared with Weinberg and this course, so be careful.) Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1972, Gravitation, (New York: Freeman) At 1280 pages, don't drop this on your toe. Even the paperback version. MTW, as it is known, is often criticised for its sheer bulk, its seemingly endless meanderings and its laboured strivings at building mathematical and physical intuition at every possible step. But I must say, in the end, there really is a lot of very good material in here, much that is difficult to find anywhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977
    Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977 INTERVIEWEES: John Todd & Olga Taussky Todd INTERVIEWER: Henry S. Tropp DATE OF INTERVIEW: July 12, 1973 Tropp: This is a discussion with Doctor and Mrs. Todd in their apartment at the University of Michigan on July 2nd, l973. This question that I asked you earlier, Mrs. Todd, about your early meetings with Von Neumann, I think are just worth recording for when you first met him and when you first saw him. Olga Tauskky Todd: Well, I first met him and saw him at that time. I actually met him at that location, he was lecturing in the apartment of Menger to a private little set. Tropp: This was Karl Menger's apartment in Vienna? Olga Tauskky Todd: In Vienna, and he was on his honeymoon. And he lectured--I've forgotten what it was about, I am ashamed to say. It would come back, you know. It would come back, but I cannot recall it at this moment. It had nothing to do with game theory. I don't know, something in.... John Todd: She has a very good memory. It will come back. Tropp: Right. Approximately when was this? Before l930? Olga Tauskky Todd: For additional information, contact the Archives Center at 202.633.3270 or [email protected] Computer Oral History Collection, 1969-1973, 1977 No. I think it may have been in 1932 or something like that. Tropp: In '32. Then you said you saw him again at Goettingen, after the-- Olga Tauskky Todd: I saw him at Goettingen.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory
    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory a b L. Álvarez-Gaumé ∗ and M.A. Vázquez-Mozo † a CERN, Geneva, Switzerland b Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Abstract In these lectures we present a few topics in quantum field theory in detail. Some of them are conceptual and some more practical. They have been se- lected because they appear frequently in current applications to particle physics and string theory. 1 Introduction These notes are based on lectures delivered by L.A.-G. at the 3rd CERN–Latin-American School of High- Energy Physics, Malargüe, Argentina, 27 February–12 March 2005, at the 5th CERN–Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics, Medellín, Colombia, 15–28 March 2009, and at the 6th CERN–Latin- American School of High-Energy Physics, Natal, Brazil, 23 March–5 April 2011. The audience on all three occasions was composed to a large extent of students in experimental high-energy physics with an important minority of theorists. In nearly ten hours it is quite difficult to give a reasonable introduction to a subject as vast as quantum field theory. For this reason the lectures were intended to provide a review of those parts of the subject to be used later by other lecturers. Although a cursory acquaintance with the subject of quantum field theory is helpful, the only requirement to follow the lectures is a working knowledge of quantum mechanics and special relativity. The guiding principle in choosing the topics presented (apart from serving as introductions to later courses) was to present some basic aspects of the theory that present conceptual subtleties.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-Crystal Symmetry and Classification-1.Pdf
    R. I. Badran Solid State Physics Fundamental types of lattices and crystal symmetry Crystal symmetry: What is a symmetry operation? It is a physical operation that changes the positions of the lattice points at exactly the same places after and before the operation. In other words, it is an operation when applied to an object leaves it apparently unchanged. e.g. A translational symmetry is occurred, for example, when the function sin x has a translation through an interval x = 2 leaves it apparently unchanged. Otherwise a non-symmetric operation can be foreseen by the rotation of a rectangle through /2. There are two groups of symmetry operations represented by: a) The point groups. b) The space groups (these are a combination of point groups with translation symmetry elements). There are 230 space groups exhibited by crystals. a) When the symmetry operations in crystal lattice are applied about a lattice point, the point groups must be used. b) When the symmetry operations are performed about a point or a line in addition to symmetry operations performed by translations, these are called space group symmetry operations. Types of symmetry operations: There are five types of symmetry operations and their corresponding elements. 85 R. I. Badran Solid State Physics Note: The operation and its corresponding element are denoted by the same symbol. 1) The identity E: It consists of doing nothing. 2) Rotation Cn: It is the rotation about an axis of symmetry (which is called "element"). If the rotation through 2/n (where n is integer), and the lattice remains unchanged by this rotation, then it has an n-fold axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Lorentz Symmetry and Nonlinear Spinor Fields in a Flat Finslerian Space-Time
    Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 2004, Vol. 50, Part 2, 637–644 Generalized Lorentz Symmetry and Nonlinear Spinor Fields in a Flat Finslerian Space-Time George BOGOSLOVSKY † and Hubert GOENNER ‡ † Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] ‡ Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of G¨ottingen, G¨ottingen, Germany E-mail: [email protected] The work is devoted to the generalization of the Dirac equation for a flat locally anisotropic, i.e. Finslerian space-time. At first we reproduce the corresponding metric and a group of the generalized Lorentz transformations, which has the meaning of the relativistic symmetry group of such event space. Next, proceeding from the requirement of the generalized Lorentz invariance we find a generalized Dirac equation in its explicit form. An exact solution of the nonlinear generalized Dirac equation is also presented. 1 Introduction In spite of the impressive successes of the unified gauge theory of strong, weak and electromag- netic interactions, known as the Standard Model, one cannot a priori rule out the possibility that Lorentz symmetry underlying the theory is an approximate symmetry of nature. This implies that at the energies already attainable today empirical evidence may be obtained in favor of violation of Lorentz symmetry. At the same time it is obvious that such effects might manifest themselves only as strongly suppressed effects of Planck-scale physics. Theoretical speculations about a possible violation of Lorentz symmetry continue for more than forty years and they are briefly outlined in [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): 21St Century Analysis
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Joule's 19th Century Energy Conservation Meta-Law and the 20th Century Physics (Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): 21st Century Analysis Vladik Kreinovich · Olga Kosheleva Received: December 22, 2019 / Accepted: date Abstract Joule's Energy Conservation Law was the first \meta-law": a gen- eral principle that all physical equations must satisfy. It has led to many important and useful physical discoveries. However, a recent analysis seems to indicate that this meta-law is inconsistent with other principles { such as the existence of free will. We show that this conclusion about inconsistency is based on a seemingly reasonable { but simplified { analysis of the situation. We also show that a more detailed mathematical and physical analysis of the situation reveals that not only Joule's principle remains true { it is actually strengthened: it is no longer a principle that all physical theories should satisfy { it is a principle that all physical theories do satisfy. Keywords Joule · Energy Conservation Law · Free will · General Relativity · Planck's constant 1 Introduction Joule's Energy Conservation Law: historically the first meta-law. Throughout the centuries, physicists have been trying to come up with equa- tions and laws that describe different physical phenomenon. Before Joule, how- ever, there were no general principles that restricted such equations. James Joule showed, in [13{15], that different physical phenomena are inter-related, and that there is a general principle covering all the phenom- This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science) and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence).
    [Show full text]
  • Exact Solutions to the Interacting Spinor and Scalar Field Equations in the Godel Universe
    XJ9700082 E2-96-367 A.Herrera 1, G.N.Shikin2 EXACT SOLUTIONS TO fHE INTERACTING SPINOR AND SCALAR FIELD EQUATIONS IN THE GODEL UNIVERSE 1 E-mail: [email protected] ^Department of Theoretical Physics, Russian Peoples ’ Friendship University, 117198, 6 Mikluho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russia ^8 as ^; 1996 © (XrbCAHHeHHuft HHCTtrryr McpHMX HCCJicAOB&Htift, fly 6na, 1996 1. INTRODUCTION Recently an increasing interest was expressed to the search of soliton-like solu ­ tions because of the necessity to describe the elementary particles as extended objects [1]. In this work, the interacting spinor and scalar field system is considered in the external gravitational field of the Godel universe in order to study the influence of the global properties of space-time on the interaction of one ­ dimensional fields, in other words, to observe what is the role of gravitation in the interaction of elementary particles. The Godel universe exhibits a number of unusual properties associated with the rotation of the universe [2]. It is ho ­ mogeneous in space and time and is filled with a perfect fluid. The main role of rotation in this universe consists in the avoidance of the cosmological singu ­ larity in the early universe, when the centrifugate forces of rotation dominate over gravitation and the collapse does not occur [3]. The paper is organized as follows: in Sec. 2 the interacting spinor and scalar field system with £jnt = | <ptp<p'PF(Is) in the Godel universe is considered and exact solutions to the corresponding field equations are obtained. In Sec. 3 the properties of the energy density are investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Noether's Theorems and Gauge Symmetries
    Noether’s Theorems and Gauge Symmetries Katherine Brading St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, OX2 6LE [email protected] and Harvey R. Brown Sub-faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX1 4JJ [email protected] August 2000 Consideration of the Noether variational problem for any theory whose action is invariant under global and/or local gauge transformations leads to three distinct the- orems. These include the familiar Noether theorem, but also two equally important but much less well-known results. We present, in a general form, all the main results relating to the Noether variational problem for gauge theories, and we show the rela- tionships between them. These results hold for both Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. 1 Introduction There is widespread confusion over the role of Noether’s theorem in the case of local gauge symmetries,1 as pointed out in this journal by Karatas and Kowalski (1990), and Al-Kuwari and Taha (1991).2 In our opinion, the main reason for the confusion is failure to appreciate that Noether offered two theorems in her 1918 work. One theorem applies to symmetries associated with finite dimensional arXiv:hep-th/0009058v1 8 Sep 2000 Lie groups (global symmetries), and the other to symmetries associated with infinite dimensional Lie groups (local symmetries); the latter theorem has been widely forgotten. Knowledge of Noether’s ‘second theorem’ helps to clarify the significance of the results offered by Al-Kuwari and Taha for local gauge sym- metries, along with other important and related work such as that of Bergmann (1949), Trautman (1962), Utiyama (1956, 1959), and Weyl (1918, 1928/9).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 the Relativistic Point Particle
    Chapter 5 The Relativistic Point Particle To formulate the dynamics of a system we can write either the equations of motion, or alternatively, an action. In the case of the relativistic point par- ticle, it is rather easy to write the equations of motion. But the action is so physical and geometrical that it is worth pursuing in its own right. More importantly, while it is difficult to guess the equations of motion for the rela- tivistic string, the action is a natural generalization of the relativistic particle action that we will study in this chapter. We conclude with a discussion of the charged relativistic particle. 5.1 Action for a relativistic point particle How can we find the action S that governs the dynamics of a free relativis- tic particle? To get started we first think about units. The action is the Lagrangian integrated over time, so the units of action are just the units of the Lagrangian multiplied by the units of time. The Lagrangian has units of energy, so the units of action are L2 ML2 [S]=M T = . (5.1.1) T 2 T Recall that the action Snr for a free non-relativistic particle is given by the time integral of the kinetic energy: 1 dx S = mv2(t) dt , v2 ≡ v · v, v = . (5.1.2) nr 2 dt 105 106 CHAPTER 5. THE RELATIVISTIC POINT PARTICLE The equation of motion following by Hamilton’s principle is dv =0. (5.1.3) dt The free particle moves with constant velocity and that is the end of the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.10745V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 23 Oct 2019 2.2 Symmetry-Protected Time Crystals
    A Brief History of Time Crystals Vedika Khemania,b,∗, Roderich Moessnerc, S. L. Sondhid aDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA bDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA cMax-Planck-Institut f¨urPhysik komplexer Systeme, 01187 Dresden, Germany dDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA Abstract The idea of breaking time-translation symmetry has fascinated humanity at least since ancient proposals of the per- petuum mobile. Unlike the breaking of other symmetries, such as spatial translation in a crystal or spin rotation in a magnet, time translation symmetry breaking (TTSB) has been tantalisingly elusive. We review this history up to recent developments which have shown that discrete TTSB does takes place in periodically driven (Floquet) systems in the presence of many-body localization (MBL). Such Floquet time-crystals represent a new paradigm in quantum statistical mechanics — that of an intrinsically out-of-equilibrium many-body phase of matter with no equilibrium counterpart. We include a compendium of the necessary background on the statistical mechanics of phase structure in many- body systems, before specializing to a detailed discussion of the nature, and diagnostics, of TTSB. In particular, we provide precise definitions that formalize the notion of a time-crystal as a stable, macroscopic, conservative clock — explaining both the need for a many-body system in the infinite volume limit, and for a lack of net energy absorption or dissipation. Our discussion emphasizes that TTSB in a time-crystal is accompanied by the breaking of a spatial symmetry — so that time-crystals exhibit a novel form of spatiotemporal order.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Parity Doublets and Chiral Spin Symmetry
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 014030 (2018) Baryon parity doublets and chiral spin symmetry M. Catillo and L. Ya. Glozman Institute of Physics, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria (Received 24 April 2018; published 25 July 2018) The chirally symmetric baryon parity-doublet model can be used as an effective description of the baryon-like objects in the chirally symmetric phase of QCD. Recently it has been found that above the critical temperature, higher chiral spin symmetries emerge in QCD. It is demonstrated here that the baryon parity-doublet Lagrangian is manifestly chiral spin invariant. We construct nucleon interpolators with fixed chiral spin transformation properties that can be used in lattice studies at high T. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014030 I. BARYON PARITY DOUBLETS. fermions of opposite parity, parity doublets, that transform INTRODUCTION into each other upon a chiral transformation [1]. Consider a pair of the isodoublet fermion fields A Dirac Lagrangian of a massless fermion field is chirally symmetric since the left- and right-handed com- Ψ ponents of the fermion field are decoupled, Ψ ¼ þ ; ð4Þ Ψ− μ μ μ L iψγ¯ μ∂ ψ iψ¯ Lγμ∂ ψ L iψ¯ Rγμ∂ ψ R; 1 ¼ ¼ þ ð Þ Ψ Ψ where the Dirac bispinors þ and − have positive and negative parity, respectively. The parity doublet above is a where spinor constructed from two Dirac bispinors and contains eight components. Note that there is, in addition, an isospin 1 1 ψ R ¼ ð1 þ γ5Þψ; ψ L ¼ ð1 − γ5Þψ: ð2Þ index which is suppressed. Given that the right- and left- 2 2 handed fields are directly connected
    [Show full text]