Journal of the Senate 99Th Legislature REGULAR SESSION of 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Candidate Survey, P
Candidate Survey, p. 5 Vote November 7 Lifespannews Volume 35 Number 7 Presenting the Pro-Life Message in Southeastern Michigan Since 1970 Sept./Oct. 2006 Reprinted with permission from Gary Cangemi Where do the Candidates for Governor STAND on Abortion? Jennifer Granholm Dick DeVos Should the gruesome procedure of partial-birth abortion be banned? NO YES Are you against tax dollars being used to pay for abortions? NO YES Should women be given information about the risks of abortion and fetal development at least 24 hours before having an abortion? NO YES Should minors be required to receive a parent’s consent before having an abortion? NO YES Should Roe v. Wade, the decision that has led to the deaths of more than 46 million unborn babies, be overturned? NO YES Dick DeVos supports life-saving pro-life legislation and fewer abortions while Governor Jennifer Granholm supports abortion on demand, tax-funded abortions and partial-birth abortions and is against laws for informed consent for women and parental consent before a child’s secret abortion. —Right to Life of Michigan Dick DeVos’ comments on Lifespan’s Candidate Questionnaire; see pages 5, 7, 11, 14, 17: 1. I support the reversal of the Roe v. Wade decision. I am a pro-life candidate with great respect for the sanctity of life. I believe that Michigan has an obligation to protect all life from conception to natural death. 4. I am committed to protecting life from conception until natural death. In my attempts to become more informed about the use of stem cells for research, I have found that there are many life affirming alternatives (stem cells found in fat, umbilical cord blood, bone marrow, etc.). -
Citizens Guide
Dear Citizen: It is of primary importance that the general public increase its participation in the decision- making process. In order to actuate this input, the citizen must acquire an understanding of the legislative structure and process and then organize concerted efforts to effectively demand representation. Individuals can have an impact on specific legislative proposals, provided it is made at the appropriate time. Organized community and citizens’ groups can multiply the impact of that individual effort. Organizing citizens’ groups to deal with specific community problems is extremely important. Such groups provide a focal point from which citizens can participate in the decision-making process and influence legislation. The intent of this CITIZEN’S GUIDE is to provide some of the specific information needed to get in touch with the RIGHT PEOPLE AT THE RIGHT TIME to make your concerns heard. It is hoped that it will be a reference tool that will assist you in your efforts to be heard by public officials. Cover: Copyright, Legislative Council Facility Agency Photographs by Tom Gennara and Christopher Powers A CITIZEN’S GUIDE TO STATE GOVERNMENT 2007 – 2008 MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE Revised and Updated as of March 2008 Prepared by the Michigan Legislature www.legislature.mi.gov This information is provided free to Michigan citizens and is not for reproduction for resale or profit. TABLE OF CONTENTS Citizen Participation ....................................................................................................................................... -
VOTER SURVEY Lifespan Sent the Following Nine-Question Survey to Each Candidate for Governor, U.S
Vote August 8 ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ Lifespannews Volume 35 Number 5 Presenting the Pro-Life Message in Southeastern Michigan Since 1970 July 2006 VOTER SURVEY Lifespan sent the following nine-question survey to each candidate for Governor, U.S. House of Repre- sentatives, Michigan Senate, Michigan House of Representatives, Appeals, Circuit, District and Probate Inside: Judicial offices, County Commissioner and various local city and township offices in Wayne, Oakland, • District Index Macomb and Livingston Counties. page 2 1. The 1973 U.S. Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision allows for abortion for any reason, even as a • Wayne method of birth control, even in the late stages of pregnancy. Do you SUPPORT the reversal of this County decision? pages 3-7 2. Do you SUPPORT a law banning partial-birth abortions, except to prevent the death of the mother? • Oakland County 3. Some public funds are used for abortions or abortion referral. Do you OPPOSE the use of public pages 8-11 ¨funds for abortion or abortion referral, except to prevent the death of the mother? 4. Human embryonic stem cells and human fetal tissue are used in some medical experimentation • Election which has no beneficial effects for the fetus. Would you SUPPORT legislation that would prohibit Calendar the use of embryonic stem cells and fetal tissue in such experiments? page 11 5. Would you SUPPORT a law banning so-called “reproductive cloning”—cloning meant to result • Macomb in the birth of a baby? County pages 12-14 6. Knowing that the removal of stem cells from human embryos results in he death of those embryos, would you SUPPORT a law banning so-called “therapeutic cloning” (somatic cell nuclear transfer)? • Livingston County 7. -
L!..I!F-- Supplemental Filing of NLG Committee on Democratic Communications - Page 1
DOCKETALECOPYOR'G~ 1 Committee on Democratic Communications National Lawyers Guild 2 558 Capp Street ,.jUG San Francisco, California 94110 c21999 3 (415) 522-9814 FCC rvv~~:'/ 4 5 Before the 6 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 7 8 ) In the Matter of ) MM Docket No. 99-25 9 ) Creation ofa Low ) RM-9208 10 Power Radio Service ) RM-9242 ) 11 ) 12 13 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING OF NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD 14 COMMITTEE ON DEMOCRATIC COMMUNICATIONS 15 16 For the benefit and consideration ofthe Commission, the National Lawyers Guild 17 Committee on Democratic Communications hereby submits the attached resolutions passed by 18 city and county governments, labor organizations, and others in support ofthe Commission's 19 proposed rulemaking in connection with a low power FM service. These resolutions and 20 supporting documents are organized as follows: 21 Exhibit I City and County Government Resolutions 22 Exhibit 2 23 Resolution Pending in the Michigan Legislature 24 Exhibit 3 Resolutions Passed by Labor Organizations 25 Exhibit 4 Other Resolutions and Supporting Documents 26 III 27 No. of Copies rec'd /1-; /I 28 List ABCDE L!..I!f-- Supplemental Filing of NLG Committee on Democratic CommunICations - Page 1 .. _ -_.._ _ _-_ -------'-- ,, 1 2 3 4 an om Committee on Democratic Communications 5 National Lawyers Guild 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Supplemental Filing ofNLG Committee on Democratic Communications - Page 2 EXHIBIT 1 CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT RESOLUTIONS Minutes Berkeley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 16,1999 Preliminary Matters Roll Call: 7:09 p.m. -
Beer and Wine Wholesalers Are Life of Politicians' Parties
K 6A FRIDAY, FEB. 11, 2005 UNDER THE INFLUENCE DETROIT FREE PRESS | WWW.FREEP.COM BEER | Wholesalers are the life of politicians’ parties From Page 1A for the party room. The PAC also gave another $175,000 in contribu- tions to some of the lawmakers. Pat Laughlin, the wholesalers’ chief lobbyist, said the group is simply exercising its rights to lob- by for its cause. “What we’re doing is making a Raymond Nancy Irma Craig Alan Mary contribution to legally pay for a Basham Cassis Clark-Coleman DeRoche Sanborn Waters fund-raiser, where we feel we have a relationship with somebody and we feel that they’re honest and willing to sit down and talk to us and understand our business,” he said. “These people have to make Spreading the money decisions that affect our liveli- hoods and the livelihoods of our PAYING FOR FUND-RAISERS. The Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association’s political action employees.” committee and individual wholesalers picked up the costs for metro Detroit legislators to stage at OTHER RECIPIENTS. Some metro Detroit legislators did not Although hosting fund-raisers least 83 fund-raising parties from 2001 to 2004. Candidates raised more than $441,000 at the have fund-raisers paid for by the PAC. But they weren't is not illegal, campaign watchdogs parties and received an additional $175,000 in PAC contributions. Here’s the breakdown: left out –– they also received contributions. say it creates the impression that the wholesalers and lawmakers Party tab How much Additional are trading favors. Fund- paid by legislators donation from Contributions “It should raise in the public’s Legislator Hometown raisers the PAC raised the PAC Legislator Hometown from the PAC mind what” the wholesalers “are Rep.