DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior Blm, Boise District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior Blm, Boise District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BLM, BOISE DISTRICT EA # DOI-BLM-ID-B030-2009-0004-EA Title Page Applicant (if any): Proposed Action: To respond to a EA No. Tommy and grazing permit renewal DOI-BLM-ID-B030-2009-0004-EA Barbara Moore application and improve Also known as EA # ID-130-2009-EA-3783 resource conditions State: County: District: Field Office: Authority: Idaho Owyhee Boise Owyhee NEPA, FLPMA Prepared By: Title: Report Date: OFO ID Team Pole Creek Allotment Permit Renewal 2/28/2012 LANDS INVOLVED Meridian Township Range Sections Acres 10S 6W 14, 15, 22-27, 34-36 10S 5W 19, 30-32 Boise 11S 6W 1-3, 10-15, 22-27, 34-36 23,395 11S 5W 4-10, 15-21, 28-33 12S 6W 2, 3 12S 5W 1 Consideration of Critical Elements N/A or Applicable Discussed Not or Present, in EA Present No Impact Air Quality X Areas of Critical Environmental Concern X Cultural Resources X Environmental Justice (E.O. 12898) X Farm Lands (prime or unique) X Floodplains X Migratory Birds X Native American Religious Concerns X Invasive, Nonnative Species X Wastes, Hazardous or Solid X Threatened or Endangered Species X Socio-economic X Water Quality (Drinking/Ground) X Wetlands/Riparian Zones X Wild and Scenic Rivers (Eligible) X Wilderness Study Areas X DOI-BLM-ID-B030-2009-0004-EA Pole Creek Allotment Grazing Permit Renewal Environmental Assessment # DOI-BLM-ID-B030-2009-0004-EA Pole Creek Allotment Grazing Permit Renewal Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 LOCATION, SETTING, AND BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 NEED FOR AND PURPOSE OF ACTION ................................................................................................... 6 1.3 SCOPING AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISSUES............................................................................................ 7 1.4 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION ......................................................................................................... 8 1.5 CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAND USE PLAN .................................................................... 10 1.6 RELATIONSHIP TO STATUTES, REGULATIONS, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS ......................... 11 1.6.1 Idaho Standards for Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management .......... 11 1.6.2 Litigation History .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.6.3 Statutes .............................................................................................................................................. 11 1.6.4 Collaborative Habitat Management Plans ........................................................................................ 12 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................... 13 2.1 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ........................................................................................... 13 2.2 MANAGEMENT COMMON TO ALL ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Inventory and Monitoring .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Management Objectives (Alternatives A1, A2, C1, C2, and D) ......................................................... 14 2.2.3 Range Improvement Projects (Alternatives B, C1, C2, and partial D) ............................................. 15 2.2.4 Juniper Treatments/Management (Alternatives B, C1, C2, and D) ................................................... 17 2.2.5 Livestock Trailing/Crossing (Alternatives A1-C2) ............................................................................ 23 2.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................................................. 24 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ......................................................... 26 2.4.1 Alternative A1 – Continue Present Management from 2008-2011. ................................................... 26 2.4.2 Alternative A2 – Management in Accordance with the 1997 Grazing Permit ................................... 28 2.4.3 Alternative B – Adaptive Management .............................................................................................. 29 2.4.4 Alternative C1 – Proposed Action – Spring Use/Rest ....................................................................... 34 2.4.5 Alternative C2 – Spring Use/Rest with a 40% Reduction .................................................................. 38 2.4.6 Alternative D – No Grazing ............................................................................................................... 40 2.5 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 42 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................. 44 3.1 UPLAND VEGETATION/NOXIOUS WEEDS ........................................................................................... 44 3.1.1 Affected Environment – Upland Vegetation/Noxious Weeds ............................................................. 44 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences – Upland Vegetation/Noxious Weeds ................................................ 55 3.2 WATERSHED AND SOILS ......................................................................................................................... 67 3.2.1 Affected Environment – Watershed/Soils .......................................................................................... 67 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences – Watershed/Soils .............................................................................. 69 3.3 WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................... 74 3.3.1 Affected Environment – Water Quality .............................................................................................. 75 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences – Water Quality ................................................................................. 77 3.4 WETLANDS/RIPARIAN AREAS ............................................................................................................... 81 3.4.1 Affected Environment – Wetlands/Riparian Areas ............................................................................ 81 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences – Wetlands/Riparian Areas ............................................................... 85 3.5 FISH AND WILDLIFE/SPECIAL STATUS ANIMALS ............................................................................ 90 3.5.1 Affected Environment – Fish and Wildlife/Special Status Animals ................................................... 90 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences – Fish and Wildlife/Special Status Animals ...................................... 98 3.6 BOTANY/SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS ................................................................................................... 114 3.6.1 Affected Environment – Botany/Special Status Plants .................................................................... 115 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences – Botany/Special Status Plants ........................................................ 116 3.7 GRAZING MANAGEMENT/SOCIO-ECONOMICS ............................................................................... 121 DOI-BLM-ID-B030-2009-0004-EA Pole Creek Allotment Grazing Permit Renewal 3.7.1 Affected Environment – Grazing Management/Socio-economics .................................................... 121 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences – Grazing Management/Socio-economics ....................................... 122 3.8 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 127 3.8.1 Affected Environment – Cultural and Paleontological Resources .................................................. 127 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences – Cultural and Paleontological Resources ..................................... 128 3.9 RECREATION AND VISUAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 129 3.9.1 Affected Environment – Recreation and Visual Resources ............................................................. 129 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences – Recreation and Visual Resources ................................................. 130 3.10 LANDS WITH WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................. 134 3.10.1 Affected Environment – Lands with Wilderness Characteristics ..................................................... 134 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences – Lands with Wilderness Characteristics ........................................ 136 3.11 AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................................................... 139 3.11.1 Affected Environment – Air Quality ................................................................................................ 139 3.11.2 Environmental Consequences – Air Quality .................................................................................... 140 4.0 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tri-State Fuel Breaks Project Draft EIS, Volume 1
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tri-state Fuel Breaks Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Volume 1) DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2015-0001-EIS October 2019 Boise District Office 3948 Development Ave. Boise, Idaho 83705 Vale District Office 100 Oregon St. Vale, Oregon 97918 Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing This DEIS $1,408,000 The Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Executive Summary Introduction This draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) evaluates creating and maintaining a system of roadside fuel breaks to improve suppression coordination and response across the Tri-state area where southeastern Oregon, southwestern Idaho, and northern Nevada converge. This area contains the largest expanse of intact sagebrush steppe in North America, an ecosystem that supports diverse wildlife and is critically imperiled by the threat of wildland fire. The project area encompasses 3.6 million acres across the southeastern corner of Oregon and southwestern corner of Idaho. The proposed fuel breaks would connect to existing fuel breaks within northern Nevada to improve firefighting coordination across jurisdictional and state boundaries and better protect this threatened landscape. Purpose and Need The purpose of the action alternatives is to provide a network of safe areas and strategic opportunities to enable wildland fire suppression resources in the Tri-state area to more rapidly and effectively protect natural and cultural resources and socioeconomic values from wildfires.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002/2003 Draft Integrated (303(D)/305(B) Report
    Principles and Policies for the 2002/2003 DRAFT INTEGRATED (303(d)/305(b)) REPORT Upper Owyhee Watershed State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 1410 N. Hilton Boise, ID 83706 June 2, 2003 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 EPA Requirements for the 2002/2003 Integrated Report............................................................... 1 • delineation of water quality AUs based on the National Hydrography Dataset;.................... 2 • status of and progress toward achieving comprehensive assessments of all waters;.............. 2 • water quality standard attainment status for every AU;.......................................................... 2 • basis for the water quality standard attainment determinations for every AU; ...................... 2 • additional monitoring that may be needed to determine water quality standard attainment status and, if necessary, to support development of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for each pollutant/AU combination; ............................................................................................................. 2 • schedules for additional monitoring planned for AUs;........................................................... 2 • pollutant/AU combinations require TMDLs; and................................................................... 2 • TMDL development schedules reflecting the priority ranking of each pollutant/AU combination....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Plan for the North and Middle Fork of the Owyhee River
    Implementation Plan for the North and Middle Fork of the Owyhee River February 27, 2002 Compiled by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality in association with the Bureau of Land Management, Idaho Department of Lands, Idaho Soil Conservation Commission, and the North & Middle Fork Owyhee Watershed Advisory Group The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality would like to thank the following individuals and agencies for their participation in Upper and Middle Fork Owyhee Watershed Advisory Group and the review of this document1. Without the assistance of these individuals this document could not have been developed. Upper & Middle Fork Owyhee WAG John Crum Shoshone-Paiute Tribe Tim Lowry Rancher/Landowner Mike Medberry American Lands Alliance Larry Meredith Recreational Industry Representative Lowell Murdock Idaho Department of Lands Jeanie Stanford Rancher/Landowner Bruce Zoellick Bureau of Land Management Joe Parkinson Member at Large Brenda Richards Rancher/Landowner Others Participants Jim Desmond Owyhee County Natural Resources Committee Steve West Regional Administrator - Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Gary Dailey Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Jenna Whitlock Bureau of Land Management Charlie Bidondo Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Dr. Chad Gibson Owyhee Range Service Keith Griswold Idaho Soil Conservation Commission Judy Maynard Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Pete Sinclair Natural Resources Conservation Service Craig Shepard Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Jerry Hoagland Owyhee County Natural Resources Committee* Mike Ingham Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Ken Crane Idaho State Department of Agriculture Leo Coleman Bureau of Land Management* * WAG Alternate 1 Participation in the Middle and North Fork Owyhee Watershed Advisory Group or the submittal of comments on the Middle and North Fork Owyhee TMDL Implementation Plan does not constitute endorsement or agreement with the document or its content.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Owyhee Subbasin Summary
    Draft Owyhee Subbasin Summary May 17, 2002 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Subbasin Team Leader Carol Perugini, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Writing Team Members Darin Saul, ecovista Craig Rabe, ecovista Anne Davidson, ecovista William A. Warren Dora Rollins Susan Lewis, ecovista Contributors Bureau of Land Management, Owyhee Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Elko Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Bruneau Resource Area Bureau of Land Management Jordan Resource Area Bureau of Land Management Malheur Resource Area Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Idaho Department of Fish and Game Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Idaho Soil Conservation Commission Nevada Division of Wildlife Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Owyhee County Commissioners The Nature Conservancy United States Bureau of Reclamation United States Fish and Wildlife Service DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Owyhee Subbasin Summary Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Subbasin Description.......................................................................................................................3 General Description .................................................................................................................... 3 Fish and Wildlife Resources .........................................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho's 2018/2020 Integrated Report
    Idaho’s 2018/2020 Integrated Report Appendix A: Clean Water Act Section 305 (b) List and Section 303(d) List State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality October 2020 www.deq.idaho.gov Prepared by Robert Esquivel Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Surface Water and Wastewater Division 1410 North Hilton Boise, Idaho 83706 Printed on recycled paper, DEQ October 2020, PID 303D, CA code 303D. Costs associated with this publication are available from the State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code. Idaho’s 2018/2020 Integrated Report: Appendix A Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iv Category 1: Waters are wholly within a designated wilderness or 2008 Idaho Road Rule “Wild Land Recreation” area and are presumed to be fully supporting all beneficial uses. ... 1 Category 2: Waters are fully supporting those beneficial uses that have been assessed. The use attainment of the remaining beneficial uses has not been determined due to insufficient (or no) data and information. ................................................................................................. 21 Category 3: Waters have insufficient (or no) data and information to determine if beneficial uses are being attained or impaired. ...................................................................................... 73 Category 4a: Waters have a TMDL completed and approved by EPA. ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Administrative Bulletin
    IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN Table of Contents Vol-2 January 6, 1999 Volume 99-1 IDAPA 16 - HEALTH AND WELFARE 16.01.02 - WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCKET NO. 16-0102-9704 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE .............................................................................................................2 SUBJECTS AFFECTED INDEX............................................................................................................................158 CUMULATIVE RULE-MAKING INDEX................................................................................................................159 SUBJECT INDEX.....................................................................................................................................................160 January 6, 1999 Page 1 Volume No. 99-1 IDAPA 16 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE 16.01.02 - WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS DOCKET NO. 16-0102-9704 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE AUTHORITY: In compliance with Section 67-5221(1), Idaho Code, notice is hereby given that this agency has proposed rulemaking. The action is authorized by Sections 39-105, 39-107, and 39-3601 et seq., Idaho Code, and is being conducted to meet the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE: Public hearing(s) concerning this proposed rulemaking will be held as a statewide, interactive video teleconference originating in Boise, Idaho on July 20, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. MDT (6:00 p.m. PDT). Hearing
    [Show full text]
  • The Tectonomagmatic Evolution of the Late Cenozoic Owyhee Plateau, Northwestern United States
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Kurt A. Shoemaker Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy William K. Hart, Director Elisabeth Widom, Reader Craig M. White, Reader John M. Hughes Michael J. Pechan, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT THE TECTONOMAGMATIC EVOLUTION OF THE LATE CENOZOIC OWYHEE PLATEAU, NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES by Kurt A. Shoemaker The Owyhee Plateau (OWP) is an intermontane basalt plateau located at the nexus of the Snake River Plain (SRP) and Oregon Plateau/High Lava Plains (OP/HLP) volcanic provinces, which has been the locus of nearly continuous basaltic magmatism since 17 Ma. Between 17-11 Ma, generally evolved basaltic lavas related to the Steens flood basalt event and Oregon-Idaho Graben (OIG) volcanism were erupted around the extending margins of the OWP. Beginning 11 Ma, less differentiated olivine tholeiites were erupted throughout the OWP proper, from low shield vents with alignments consistent with regional stress fields. After 5 Ma, volcanism retreated to the margins of the OWP, ultimately becoming limited to the northern transition region between the OWP and the OIG. The youngest basalts in the OWP region are <0.25 Ma mildly alkaline basalts erupted in this transition region. The OWP is the only location in the northwestern US where basalt types characteristic of the OP/HLP (high-alumina olivine tholeiite, HAOT) and the SRP (SRP- type olivine tholeiite, SROT) occur together in significant quantity, in close spatial and temporal association, and with a full spectrum of compositions intermediate between the two. Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic characteristics are decoupled from bulk chemistry, and reflect time-dependent variations in contributions from different lithospheric and sublithospheric mantle reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Minerals Session
    '!HE OliK.-BIN Volume 22, 1960 I - INDEX TO ORE.-BIN, Vol. 22, 1960 Abandoned mine workings, Vacationers warned (22:7:70) Active mines and mills in Oregon in 1960 (22:9:85-88) Aeromagnetic map, part of Josephine and Curry counties (22:4:41) AIME Conference program (22:3:23-26) American Mining Congress, Las Vegas meeting (22:8:81); Oregon members named (22: 10: 108); Resolutions (22: 11: 114) Assessment work, A summary, by N. S. Wagner (22:5:43-49); Postponed in fire-hazard areas (22:8:84) Boron in Alvord Valley, Harney County, Oregon, by F. W. Libbey (22: 10:97-105) Bowen, Richard G., joins Department staff (22: 1: 11) Bristol named chairman of Governor's Advisory Committee (22:9:96) Brogan receives science honors (22:7:74) Chromite, GSA to sell (22: 10: 105) Ferrochrome, Bur. Mines method for producing (22:5:50) Hearings on bill to support (22:6:63) Japan's production (22:2:22) Turkish mines. receive U. S. help,(22:2:22} Crump geyser, Lake County (22:6:62); Vandal ism kills (22:8:83) Condon lecture by glacial expert (22:3:32) Corcoran rejoins Department staff (22:6:63) Drilling rig, Department receives model (22:9:95) Eden Ridge coal to be tested (22:6:63) Exploration costs of small mines (22:9:89-91) . Forests that moved (Iandsl ide) (22:9:88) Fossil woods of Oregon, by Wallace Eubanks (22:7:65-69) Gold, Canada I ikes gold mining (22:9:96) Council on monetary education (22:12:125) Gold and money session notes, by P.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load Owyhee, ID
    Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load Owyhee County, Idaho January 2003 Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load Owyhee County, Idaho Prepared by: Boise Regional Office Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 1455 North Orchard Boise, Idaho 83706 Upper Owyhee Watershed SBA-TMDL January 2003 Acknowledgements The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise Regional Office wishes to express its sincere appreciation to the following individuals who offered technical assistance. William Clark, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Technical Services Division for his assistance in interpretation of the macroinvertebrates data and valuable comments to the development of the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load. Loren L. Bahls, Ph.D. (Hannaea), for his assistance in identification of periphyton from the Owyhee watershed and his interpretation of the periphyton data. Along with his valuable comments in the development of the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load. We also wish to express our sincere appreciation to the following individuals who offered editorial assistance. Judy Maynard, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise Regional Office for her assistance on the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load. Jayne Carlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Region X for her assistance on the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load. Amy Luft, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Technical Services Division for her assistance on the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load. Craig Shepard, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise Regional Office for his assistance on the Upper Owyhee Watershed Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Load.
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee River Watershed TMDL Temperature Addendum
    Owyhee River Watershed TMDL Temperature Addendum: North and Middle Fork Owyhee (HUC 17050107), South Fork Owyhee (HUC 17050105), and Upper Owyhee (HUC 17050104) Agricultural Implementation Plan Spring flowers along headwaters of the North Fork Owyhee River. Prepared by the Idaho Soil and Water Conservation Commission in Cooperation with the Owyhee Conservation District May 2017 Original Plans: DEQ. February 2002. Implementation Plan for the North and Middle Fork of the Owyhee River. DEQ. July 2004. Upper Owyhee Watershed TMDL Implementation Plan for Agriculture. I Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Setting ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Land Use and Land Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 2 Accomplishments .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Resource Concerns........................................................................................................................................ 3 Implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Treatment Priorities ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
    OWYHEE REsoURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP) December 30, 1999 U.S. Depanment 01 me Jntenor • ljureau 01 Lana Managemenl Lower Snake River District • Boise Field Office Owyhee Resource Management Plan Idaho 95 Sandpoint Coeur d'Alene General Location Map 90 95 Owyhee Resource Area Lower Snake River District Boundary Moscow Lewiston 95 Grangeville Oregon Salmon McCall 93 95 20 55 Stanley 15 93 75 Arco Boise 20 Idaho Falls Marsing 20 95 84 Mountain 20 Murphy Home Oreana 93 78 Shoshone Pocatello 86 Soda Springs Burley 30 Twin Falls 51 20 15 84 Nevada Table of Contents RECORD OF DECISION ............................. i TABLES INTRODUCTION RIPN-1................................................................ 87 Purpose and Need ................................................. 1 SPSS-1 ................................................................ 94 Planning Area ........................................................ 1 SPSS-2 ................................................................ 97 Public Participation ............................................... 1 WHRS-1............................................................ 102 Planning Criteria .................................................... 3 WHRS-2............................................................ 103 Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem LVST-1 .............................................................. 104 Management Project ........................................ 6 LAND-1 ............................................................ 113 Snake River Birds of Prey National
    [Show full text]
  • Owyheecombgeneralmap.Mxd in COOPERATION with the U.S
    Snake River RIVER Rd SIPES RD d R Y E L L U Goat G RIVER RD Island N HILL RD T 04 N T 04 N R 06 W R 05 W 36 31 N SIDE Rd N GULLEY RD T 03 N R 06 W Heltons 1 Snake WILLIAMS LN Island 19 River T 03 N )" R 05 W 6 S GULLEY RD HOMEDALE S SIDE RD T S MIDDLE N I STATELINE A RD M Homedale PURDOMLN SOUTH SIDE HUNT JOHNSTONEWAY MunicipalS Airport Succor Creek W PIONEER R d E PIONEER Rd Rabbit Island SAGE RD SUCCOR CREEK Rd Clarks Rd LINE Island S STATE HOMESTEAD W MARKET RD E MARKET RD Smiths Island W LOOTENS E LOOTENS SSTATE LINE Rd 95 GRAVEYARD PT WALKERLN ¤£ DINES LN SAGE RD Snake River N JUMPCREEK Rd HOMESTEAD RD N HOGG NIELSEN LN N EDISON RD AUSTRIAN SETTLEMENT W THOMPSON RD E THOMPSON RD BUNTROCK RD T 03 N T 03 N R 06 W R 05 W RDY T 03 N 36 31 R 05 W 36 OLDSULLIVAN LN T 03 N R 04 W 31 CEMETERY RD Marsing-Homedale Cemetery )"55 MARSING T 02 N T 02 N R 06 W R 05 W 1 6 T 02 N BRIGGS RD T 02 N R 05 W R 04 W 1 6 MULE SPRINGS RD W PERSHALL RD GEM D E PERSHALL RD R E N MALMBERG O LN T S JUMP CREEK S S HOGG N H O J SEDISON RD )"78 Fruit Island T 02 N T 02 N R 06 W R 05 W 36 T 02 N 31 T 02 N Dilley R 04 W R 05 W SO31 Island 36 MM ER T 02 N C R 04 W AM P 36 R D T 01 N T 01 N R 06 W R 05 W 1 6 T 01 N T 01 N Cottontail Island R 05 W R 04 W 1 6 T 01 N Foglers Snake R 04 W 1 Island River T 01 N R 03 W 6 SOMMER CAMP RD BIRMINGHAM RD Blackburn Island Jump Creek Dredge Island ¤£95 Squaw Creek )"78 Goldeneye Island Sunrise Skypark FISH POND RD Raccoon Island Snake River Hermit Island Rippee Island T 01 N T 01 N Pole R 06 W R 05 W Creek Buck 36 31 Current
    [Show full text]