DOCSLIB.ORG

A29 Realignment: Transport Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A29 Realignment: Transport Business Case West Sussex County Council A29 REALIGNMENT Transport Business Case TBC-R4 APRIL 2019 CONFIDENTIAL West Sussex County Council A29 REALIGNMENT Transport Business Case TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) CONFIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 70031782 OUR REF. NO. TBC-R4 DATE: APRIL 2019 WSP Regus House Southampton International Business Park, George Curl Way Southampton, Hampshire SO18 2RZ Phone: +44 238 030 2529 Fax: +44 238 030 2001 WSP.com CONFIDENTIAL QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Final Remarks Working Draft Draft Final Draft (for Final Draft Final for WSCC final (for WSCC C2C LEP updated) final updated) Date 09/12/2018 18/12/2018 20/12/2018 24/12/2018 04/04/2019 Prepared by Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Chris Chris Whitehead Chris Whitehead Chris Chris Whitehead Whitehead Whitehead Alex Georgeson Alex Georgeson Elaine Martin Alex Alex Elaine Martin Elaine Martin (WSCC) Georgeson Georgeson (WSCC) (WSCC) Elaine Martin Elaine (WSCC) Martin (WSCC) Signature Checked by Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Marc Griffin Signature Authorised by Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Alan Cowan Signature Project number 70031782 70031782 70031782 70031782 70031782 Report number 70031782-TBC- 70031782-TBC- 70031782-TBC- 70031782- 70031782- 01 R1 R2 TBC-R3 TBC-R4 File reference \\uk.wspgroup.com\central data\Projects\700317xx\70031782 - WSCC - A29 Prelim Design and O\02 WIP\BC Business Case\Transport Business Case A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 STRATEGIC CASE SUMMARY 1 OVERVIEW 1 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 1 National Policies 1 Regional Policies 2 Local Policies 2 EXISTING TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 4 FUTURE TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 4 OPTIONS AND THE PROPOSED SCHEME 4 Scheme Aim & Objective 4 Scope and Constraints 4 Options Considered 4 Proposed Scheme 5 Achievement of Objectives 6 ECONOMIC CASE SUMMARY 6 Benefit Cost Ratio 6 Value for Money Category 6 FINANCIAL CASE SUMMARY 6 COMMERCIAL CASE SUMMARY 6 MANAGEMENT CASE SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 8 1.2 BACKGROUND 8 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 10 2 THE SCHEME 11 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 2.1 LOCATION OF THE SCHEME 11 2.1.10 OVERVIEW 12 2.2 SCHEME DESIGN 14 2.2.2 ALTERATIONS TO THE ADJACENT ROAD NETWORK 14 2.2.4 PROVISION FOR OTHER USERS 14 3 STRATEGIC CASE 15 3.1 INTRODUCTION 15 3.2 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 16 3.2.1 OVERVIEW 16 3.2.3 NATIONAL POLICIES 17 3.2.18 REGIONAL POLICIES 19 3.2.37 LOCAL POLICIES 22 3.3 EXISTING PROBLEMS 25 3.4 FUTURE PROBLEMS – THE IMPACT OF NOT CHANGING 26 3.5 DRIVERS FOR CHANGE 27 3.6 SCHEME AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 27 3.7 MEASURES FOR SUCCESS 28 3.7.4 MONITORING & EVALUATION 28 3.8 SCOPE 29 3.8.1 IN SCOPE 29 3.8.4 OUT OF SCOPE 30 3.9 CONSTRAINTS 30 3.10 INTERDEPENDENCIES 31 3.11 OPTIONS 31 3.11.1 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 31 3.11.15 OPTION DEVELOPMENT (FOLLOWING PREVIOUS STUDIES) 40 3.11.19 OPTIONS ASSESSED 42 3.12 CONSULTATION WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS 43 3.12.3 KEY STAKEHOLDERS 44 3.12.14 FURTHER CONSULTATION 45 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 3.13 EXPECTED IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME 45 3.13.1 LOCAL MODEL VALIDATION REPORT 45 3.13.7 OPTION DEVELOPMENT - TRANSPORT BUSINESS CASE 46 3.13.19 TRAFFIC FLOWS 48 3.13.23 DO MINIMUM AND PHASE 1 (NORTH) 49 3.13.32 DO MINIMUM AND PHASE 1 (NORTH) AND 2 (SOUTH) 56 3.13.43 JOURNEY TIMES 64 3.13.46 2023 DO MINIMUM AND DO SOMETHING 64 3.13.51 2038 DO MINIMUM AND DO SOMETHING 67 3.14 DEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT 71 3.15 ACCIDENT REDUCTIONS 73 3.16 STRATEGIC CASE SUMMARY 75 3.16.1 OVERVIEW 75 3.16.5 POLICY BACKGROUND AND BUSINESS STRATEGY 75 3.16.9 EXISTING TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 75 3.16.11 FUTURE TRANSPORT-RELATED PROBLEMS 76 3.16.13 OPTIONS AND THE PROPOSED SCHEME 76 4 ECONOMIC CASE 79 4.1 INTRODUCTION 79 4.2 OPTIONS APPRAISED 79 4.2.2 OPTION IDENTIFICATION AND SHORTLISTING 79 4.2.4 OPTION ASSESSMENT 81 4.2.7 PREFERRED OPTION – OPTION 2 = PHASE 1 (NORTH) AND PHASE 2 (SOUTH) 81 4.3 COST ESTIMATION 81 4.4 BENEFITS MODELLING 82 4.4.3 FORECAST BENEFITS 84 4.4.6 USER BENEFITS 84 4.4.9 MARGINAL EXTERNALITIES 85 4.4.12 ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT 85 4.4.15 DELAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION 86 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 4.5 APPRAISAL ASSUMPTIONS 86 4.6 APPRAISAL RESULTS 86 4.7 SENSITIVITY TESTING 88 4.7.2 COST AND BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES 88 4.7.5 SWITCHING VALUES 88 4.8 APPRAISAL SUMMARY TABLE 88 4.8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL 88 4.8.4.1 Noise 88 4.8.6.1 Air Quality 89 4.8.7.1 Greenhouse gases 89 4.8.8.1 Landscape & Townscape 89 4.8.11.1 Historic Environment 89 4.8.12.1 Biodiversity 89 4.8.14.1 Water Environment 89 4.8.18 SOCIAL 90 4.8.18.1 Physical activity 90 4.8.19.1 Journey quality 90 4.8.20.1 Accidents 90 4.8.21.1 Security 90 4.8.22.1 Access to services 90 4.8.23.1 Affordability 90 4.8.24.1 Severance 91 4.8.25.1 Option and non-use values 91 4.8.27 DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS 91 4.9 WIDER IMPACTS 91 4.10 LAND VALUE UPLIFT 91 4.10.4 LAND VALUE UPLIFT ESTIMATE 92 4.10.4.1 Assumptions 92 4.10.6.1 Results 92 4.11 VALUE FOR MONEY STATEMENT 93 4.12 ECONOMIC CASE SUMMARY 96 4.12.2 BENEFIT COST RATIO 96 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 4.12.4 VALUE FOR MONEY CATEGORY 96 4.12.6 DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT APPRAISAL 96 5 FINANCIAL CASE 97 5.1 INTRODUCTION 97 5.2 COSTS 97 5.2.12 SCHEME PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION 98 5.2.14 RISK BUDGET 99 5.2.16 SPEND PROFILE 99 5.2.18 OUT-TURN PRICE ADJUSTMENT 99 5.3 BUDGETS AND FUNDING COVER 99 5.4 WHOLE LIFE COSTS 101 5.5 CAPITAL RENEWAL COSTS 101 5.6 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS 101 5.7 ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS: CASH FLOW STATEMENT 102 5.8 SUMMARY OF THE FINANCIAL CASE 102 6 COMMERCIAL CASE 103 6.1 INTRODUCTION 103 6.2 PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 103 6.3 FORM OF CONTRACT 104 6.3.2 FORM OF CONTRACT OPTIONS 104 6.3.8 FORM OF CONTRACT DISCUSSION 104 6.3.12 PREFERRED FORM OF CONTRACT 105 6.4 FORM OF PROCUREMENT 105 6.4.5 PROCUREMENT OPTIONS 105 6.4.16 PROCUREMENT DISCUSSION 107 6.4.24 PREFERRED PROCUREMENT ROUTE 108 6.5 CONTRACT STRATEGY 108 6.6 SELECTED PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 108 6.7 DESIGN ORGANISATION 109 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 6.8 PAYMENT MECHANISMS 109 6.9 PRICING FRAMEWORK AND CHARGING MECHANISMS 109 6.10 RISK ALLOCATION AND TRANSFER 109 6.11 CONTRACT LENGTH 109 6.12 HUMAN RESOURCE ISSUES 110 6.13 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 110 6.14 SUMMARY OF THE COMMERCIAL CASE 111 7 MANAGEMENT CASE 112 7.1 INTRODUCTION 112 7.2 EVIDENCE OF SIMILAR PROJECTS 112 7.2.3 DELIVERY TEAM EXPERIENCE 114 7.2.7 CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE 114 7.3 THE PROJECT PLAN 114 7.4 GOVERNANCE, ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE & ROLES 114 7.4.1 PROJECT BOARD 114 7.4.8 WSP PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM 116 7.4.11 AVOIDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 116 7.4.13 WSCC ASSESSMENT TEAM 117 7.5 THE PROJECT PROGRAMME 117 7.6 PROGRAMME DEPENDENCIES 117 7.7 ASSURANCE AND APPROVALS PLAN 117 7.7.1 GATEWAY REVIEWS 117 7.7.4 PROGRAMME FOR GATEWAY REVIEWS 118 7.7.6 FUNDING ASSURANCE 119 7.8 FINANCIAL PLAN 119 7.9 COMMUNICATIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS MANAGEMENT PLAN 119 7.9.2 COMMUNICATION AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 119 7.9.8 STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT PLAN 119 7.10 RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 122 7.10.2 RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS 122 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council 7.10.5 RISK IDENTIFICATION 123 7.10.10 QUANTIFICATION OF RISKS 124 7.10.16 MANAGING RISKS (RESPONSE PLANS AND MITIGATION) 124 7.10.19 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW 125 7.10.21 SIGNIFICANT PROJECT RISKS IDENTIFIED 125 7.11 BENEFITS REALISATION PLAN 125 7.12 MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN 130 7.12.4 DESCRIPTION 132 7.12.6 LOGIC MODEL 132 7.12.8 TYPE OF EVALUATION 132 7.12.10 DATA REQUIREMENTS 132 7.12.12 SOURCES OF DATA 133 7.12.14 IMPLEMENTATION 134 7.12.17 RESPONSIBILITY 134 7.12.19 SETTING TARGETS 134 7.12.24 LINKING INDICATORS TO OUTCOMES 134 7.13 SUMMARY OF THE MANAGEMENT CASE 135 TABLES Table 3-1 - SEP Six Year Transport Investment Programme 21 Table 3-2: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Northern Extensions to Route A) 35 Table 3-3: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Northern Extensions to Route D) 35 Table 3-4: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Southern Extensions to Route A) 36 Table 3-5: First Stage Evaluation Summary Table (Southern Extensions to Route D) 36 Table 3-6: Option Assessment Summary 38 Table 3-7: A29 Realignment preferred option 42 Table 3-8: A29 Realignment preferred option – Comparison of AM Peak Traffic Flows on existing A29 and New A29 Realignment 43 Table 3-9: Comparison of Flows on A29 (AM peak) 50 Table 3-10: Comparison of Flows on A29 (IP) 50 A29 REALIGNMENT CONFIDENTIAL | WSP Project No.: 70031782 | Our Ref No.: TBC-R4 April 2019 West Sussex County Council Table 3-11: - Comparison of Flows on A29 (PM peak) 52 Table 3-12- Comparison of Flows on A29 (AM peak) 57 Table 3-13- Comparison of Flows on A29 (IP) 57 Table 3-14- Comparison of Flows on A29 (PM peak) 58 Table 3-15 - 2023 DM vs DS AM Peak - Journey time comparison 65 Table 3-16- 2023 DM vs DS Interpeak - Journey time comparison 65 Table 3-17- 2023 DM vs DS PM Peak - Journey time comparison
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLC Boundary Map April 2011
    CRAWLEY ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 51 Langley Green & West Green HORSHAM ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 52 Northgate & Three Bridges 24 Storrington 53 Worth & Pound Hill North 25 Bramber Castle 54 Gossops Green & Ifield East 26 Pulborough 55 Bewbush & Ifield West West Sussex County Local Committees 27 Henfield 56 Broadfield 28 Billingshurst 57 Southgate & Crawley Central 29 Southwater & Nuthurst 58 Tilgate & Furnace Green With effect from April 2011 30 Warnham & Rusper 51 59 Maidenbower & Pound Hill South 31 Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath 32 Horsham Hurst 53 62 33 Horsham Riverside CRAWLEY East 34 Roffey NWorth o r61 t h 35 Holbrook 52 Grinstead Rusper 54 BOROUGH Ashurst M i d 63 Wood 30 57 59 North Horsham 55 Warnham 58 East Crawley 56West Crawley TurnersS Hill u s s e x CHICHESTER 35 60 ELECTORAL DIVISIONS Rudgwick Broadbridge Colgate West 1 The Witterings Heath 34 Hoathly 2 Selsey Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow & Ifold 32 3 Chichester South Loxwood Horsham Balcombe Ardingly 4 Chichester East 31 33 5 Chichester West Northchapel 6 Bourne Linch 64 North Horsham Horsted 7 Chichester North Lurgashall Itchingfield MID SUSSEX DISTRICT Lower Slaugham Keynes 8 Midhurst Southwater 9 Fernhurst Milland Fernhurst Beeding Ebernoe 29 10 Petworth Kirdford Nuthurst Central Mid Sussex Lindfield 10 Billingshurst Ansty & 28 Staplefield Cuckfield Urban Woolbeding 66 Rogate 67 Lodsworth HORSHAM DISTRICT Haywards Lindfield Heath 65 Rural North Chichester Wisborough Green Bolney 8 Stedham Easebourne Shipley Midhurst Cowfold with Tillington Petworth Chithurst Iping Trotton
    [Show full text]
  • A27 Arundel Bypass Preferred Route Announcement
    A27 Arundel Bypass Preferred route announcement Spring 2018 A27 Arundel Bypass Preferred route announcement Introduction Why is the scheme needed? As the only east-west trunk road south of the M25, Road safety is also a concern with an above At Highways England, we believe in a the A27 serves a population of more than 750,000 average number of accidents on this section connected country and our network people, and connects a number of coastal of the A27, while congestion around Arundel makes these connections happen. communities between Portsmouth and Pevensey, results in some drivers seeking alternative routes near Eastbourne. On average, West Sussex which are less suited to accommodating higher We strive to improve our major roads also attracts 17 million visitor days per year, traffic flows. These alternatives include the and motorways – engineering the which, according to VisitBritain, is worth around B2139 through the South Downs National Park, future to keep people moving today £508 million to the local economy1. disrupting the otherwise tranquil nature of the and moving better tomorrow. We want Park. Residents in local towns and villages are The A27 is currently a dual carriageway on also affected by increases in through traffic. to make sure all our major roads are either side of Arundel, but the single carriageway more dependable, durable and, most section and junctions through the town cannot cope with today’s traffic volumes. In recognition of these problems, the Government, importantly, safe. That’s why we’re in its Road Investment Strategy 2015-2020, set delivering £15 billion of investment on Long queues approaching Arundel are out its intention to replace “the existing single our network – the largest investment in commonplace and, with the population predicted carriageway road with a dual carriageway bypass, to rise across the region in future, congestion linking together the 2 existing dual carriageway a generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arun District Council Planning Weekly List
    List Date: 31st January 2020 ARUN DISTRICT COUNCIL PLANNING WEEKLY LIST Advertised date: 6th February 2020 The application, plans and documents may be inspected by clicking on the application reference link or by searching on line at: www.arun.gov.uk/weekly-lists. If you wish to comment on an application where representations are invited, they should be made before 27th February 2020. Comments can be submitted electronically by going to the website and commenting on the application or by writing to: Group Head of Planning The Arun Civic Centre Maltravers Road Littlehampton West Sussex BN17 5LF It may not be possible to take into account any comments received after 27th February 2020. All representations are published on our website so please make sure your views are clear and only include information that you are happy for the public to view. Do not include personal information or information from third parties unless you have their permission to do so. If a complaint is received that permission has not been given for comments included about a third party, the Council reserves the right to redact/remove all relevant information. Do not include information which is defamatory or breaches equality or any other legislation. The Council will aim to redact signatures, telephone numbers and email addresses but please help us by not including this information within the comments section if you are submitting through the website or in the main body of your letter. For details of what we do with your personal information, please refer to our privacy statement comments on planning applications which is available on our website at www.arun.gov.uk/planning-privacy-statements Unfortunately it is not possible for the council to respond to each letter individually but your comments will be carefully considered before the application is determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Cala Group Land
    LUKEN BECK 30 Carlton Crescent, Southampton SO15 2EW Tel: 023 8063 3440 www.lukenbeck.com The Clerk to the Parish Council Aldingbourne Parish Council c/o Red House 15th July 2016 100 Middleton Road Our Ref: AG/15070 Middleton-on-Sea Your Ref: West Sussex By e-mail only Dear Sir / Madam, REPRESENTATIONS TO THE ALDINGBOURNE SUBMISSION NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2016 - 2036) REGULATION 15 PUBLIC CONSULTATION We write on behalf of our client, CALA Homes (Southern Home Counties) Ltd, who have an interest in the land to the east of Westergate, as shown in Figure 1 below. The content of this letter comprises our client's formal response to the Aldingbourne Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 - 2036 (referred to in this letter as 'Reg 15 ANP 2016'), which is currently subject to public consultation under Regulation 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. Appended to this letter are our Regulation 14 comments, the Assessment of Value of Site as a Biodiversity Corridor (ECOSA, March 2016) and an Ecological Constraints and Opportunities Plan which should be read in combination with this letter. Our client's land falls within the Reg 15 ANP 2016 area and forms part of the proposed Barnham / Eastergate / Westergate (BEW) Strategic Allocation for 2000+ houses, community infrastructure and A29 realignment under Policy H SP1 of the Submission Draft Arun District Local Plan 2011 - 2031 (ADLP). The site is an important part of the wider draft Strategic Allocation and provides the east-west connection between the existing A29 and Barnham Railway Station, as required by Policy H SP1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldingbourne NP SEA Environmental Report V2.0 300320
    Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Environmental Report to accompany the Regulation 14 version of the Neighbourhood Plan Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group March 2020 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 14 consultation Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Ryan Putt Nick Chisholm-Batten Alastair Peattie Alastair Peattie Environmental Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V1.0 20th January Initial draft for 21st January Nick Chisholm- Associate 2020 Neighbourhood 2020 Batten Director Group comment V2.0 30th March 2020 Regulation 14 30th March 2020 Nick Chisholm- Associate consultation Batten Director version Prepared for: Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 14 consultation Table of Contents Non-Technical Summary ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Development Plan 2014-29
    Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Development Plan 2014-29 Submission Plan - December 2013 1 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Content Foreword 1. Introduction 2. Barnham and Eastergate Today 3. Vision Statement and Core Objectives 4. Introduction to the Policies 5. Environment and Sustainability 6. Getting Around 7. Community, Leisure and Wellbeing 8. Employment and Enterprise 9. Housing Allocation and Quality Maps A. The Area of the Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan B. Church Lane Barnham Conservation Area C. Church Lane Eastergate Conservation Area D. Eastergate Square Conservation Area E. Area of Special Character F. Open Spaces G. Proposals Map Schedules A. Assets of Community Value B. Local Green Spaces C. Local Open Spaces D. Sites where planning permission has been or may be granted Addendum 2 Barnham and Eastergate Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Foreword The popularity and attraction of the villages of Barnham and Eastergate are principally based on the separate characters of the two settlements, their geographical location between the South Downs and the coast, with the open landscape of fields laced with water courses and hedgerows which surround the settlements, and the presence of patches and strips of ancient woodland throughout the area. In addition each village has conservation areas and an area of special character, with a mixture of statutory and locally listed historical buildings, and those with special character. Investment in the villages, and change in future years, will only be worthwhile if these make a real difference to the lives of local people and the future of their community.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Arrangements Constituency Schedule
    CONSTITUENCY SCHEDULE 2019 POLLING No. DISTRICT WARD COUNTY DIVISION PARISH PARISH WARDS POLLING STATION DISTRICT ARUNDEL & SOUTH DOWNS CONSTITUENCY 1 AALD1 Barnham Fontwell Aldingbourne Aldingbourne & Westergate Aldingbourne Community Sports Centre, Olivers Meadow, Westergate, PO20 3YA 2 AALD2 Barnham Fontwell Aldingbourne Aldingbourne & Westergate Aldingbourne Community Sports Centre, Olivers Meadow, Westergate, PO20 3YA 3 AANGBG Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village Angmering Community Centre, Foxwood Avenue, Angmering, BN16 4FU 4 AANGN1 Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village St. Margarets Church Hall, Arundel Road, Angmering, BN16 4JS 5 AANGN2 Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village Angmering Village Hall, Station Road, Angmering, BN16 4HY 6 AANGS East Preston Angmering & Findon Angmering South Angmering East Preston Fire Station, North Lane, East Preston, BN16 1DA 7 AARU1 Arundel & Walberton Arundel & Courtwick Arundel Arundel Arundel Lido, Queen Street, Arundel, BN18 9JG 8 AARU2 Arundel & Walberton Arundel & Courtwick Arundel Arundel Arundel Baptist Church Hall, Torton Hill Road, Arundel BN18 9JQ 9 ABAR Barnham Fontwell Barnham & Eastergate Barnham Barnham Community Hall, Murrells Field, Yapton Road, Barnham, PO22 0AY 10 ABUR Arundel & Walberton Arundel & Courtwick Burpham (Meeting) Burpham (Meeting) Burpham Village Hall, Burpham, Arundel, BN18 9RR 11 ACLA Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Clapham Clapham Clapham and Patching Village Hall, Clapham,
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Representation Appendices
    Church Commissioners for England – Land Ownership at North Bersted, Bognor Regis Church Commissioners for England – Land Ownership at Eastergate, Westergate and Barnham A Vision for The Three Villages Barnham, Eastergate & Westergate Church Commissioners for England September 2012 The Team Church Commissioners for England Carter Jonas Church House, Great Smith Street London SW1P 3AZ Berger House, 36-38 Berkeley Square, London W1J 5AE T. +44 (0)207 898 1024 F. +44 (0)207 898 1153 T. +44 (0)20 7016 0732 www.carterjonas.co.uk John Thompson & Partners London Studio 23-25 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DN T. +44 (0)20 7017 1780 F. +44 (0)20 7017 1781 www.jtp.co.uk Savell Bird & Axon Part of the WYG Group 100 St John Street, London, EC1M 4EH T. +44 (0)20 7580 8844 F. +44 (0)20 75808818 www.sbax.co.uk A VISION FOR THE THREE VILLAGES - BARNHAM, EASTERGATE & WESTERGATE PAGE III Contents 1. BACKGROUND 1 2. UNDERSTANDING THE THREE VILLAGES 3 3. DESIGN PRINCIPLES 15 4. VISION 23 5. SUMMARY 25 DISCLAIMER: PROJECT CODE 00605 This report has been prepared for the sole use of Church Commissioners and for the intended purposes as stated in the CREATED BY SXM agreement between Church Commissioners and John Thompson & Partners (JTP). No responsibility or liability is accepted towards any other person in respect of the use of this report or for reliance on the information contained in this report by any CHECKED BY EC other person or for any other purpose. The use of this report by unauthorised third parties without written authorisation from JTP ISSUE TYPE FINAL shall be at their own risk, and JTP accept no duty of care to any such third party.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST SUSSEX - Churchyard Sites with Younger Yews
    WEST SUSSEX - churchyard sites with younger yews BARLAVINGTON St Mary SU9721616049 1992 D.Rudd-Jones A solid female yew with a girth between 9' 4" and 9' 8". BEPTON St Mary SU854183 Peter Norton An early church, rebuilt in the 13th century and in 1878. Of the six yews that grow along the east perimeter five are quite small. The largest, with a massive exposed root system, overhangs the road that leads to the farm. CHIDHAM St Mary SU788039 Peter Norton One young male grows southwest of the church. At the southeast corner of the churchyard is a larger male with three main leaders from a short bole. Much twiggy lower growth and thick stems of ivy preventing accurate measurements and 11' was estimated. CLIMPING (Clymping) St Mary the Virgin TQ002025 19/6/2011 Peter Norton The church and the parish Council use the old name of Clymping as opposed to the modern spelling seen on maps. The church has a Norman tower built in 1170 with the church added in 1230. A single female yew grows here, close to the south west gate. It has a swollen lower root, a break of crown at 5', and there is evidence of hollowing. Difficult to measure but a girth of about 12' at 1' was recorded. COCKING St Catherine of Siena SU879175 Peter Norton A church recorded in the Domesday Book, restored in the 19th century. One male yew growing north of the church had a girth of 11' at 3'. It has a tapering bole with no break of crown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hedgerows
    THE HEDGEROWS FROM CHICHESTER: FROM A24: Fontwell Avenue, • Take the A285 heading North East • Head south on the A24, at the roundabout take Eastergate, Chichester, • At the roundabout, take the 3rd exit onto the 4th exit onto Crockhurst Hill/A27 West Sussex Portfield Way/A285 • Continue straight onto Lyminster Road/A27 PO20 3AR • At Portfield Roundabout, take the 2nd exit onto • At the next three roundabouts, take the exits to Arundel Road/Westhampnett Bypass/A27 continue on the A27 CONTACT US ON • At the roundabout, take the 2nd exit and stay • At the next two roundabouts, take the 2nd exits 01243 218 513 on Arundel Road/A27 onto Fontwell Avenue/A29 • At the roundabout, take the 3rd exit onto • The development will be on your right SATNAV Fontwell Avenue/A29 PO20 3RU • The development will be on your right N L S D L E I FONTWELL FARM F H SLINDON COMMON T R O N BOXGROVE THE HEDGEROWS A27 A27 THE HEDGEROWS A27 FONTWELL NORTON 9 TANGMERE 2 A RD B N ARNETT TO CL EASTERGATE | WEST SUSSEX NY NYTON RD THE HEDGEROWS BARN HAM EASTERGATE RD T S C WESTERGATE H E T U D A R R G C R H M L E L I L T M #taylorwimpey E S N E E D A L BARNHAM C W R V Y E V W I E I @TaylorWimpey V H G I IVY LN H C taylorwimpey COLWORTH D HUR R CH LN A259 S D R A WESTERGATE H C I R S T CORNFIEL D THE S taylorwimpey.co.uk Taylor Wimpey in their efforts to improve designs reserve the right to alter site plans, floor plans, elevations and specifications without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituency Schedule 2019
    CONSTITUENCY SCHEDULE 2019 POLLING No. DISTRICT WARD COUNTY DIVISION PARISH PARISH WARDS USUAL POLLING STATION POLLING STATION USED FOR 2/23 MAY 2019, IF DIFFERENT COMMENT DISTRICT ARUNDEL & SOUTH DOWNS CONSTITUENCY 1 AALD1 Barnham Fontwell Aldingbourne Aldingbourne & Westergate Aldingbourne Community Sports Centre, Olivers Meadow, Westergate, PO20 3YA 2 AALD2 Barnham Fontwell Aldingbourne Aldingbourne & Westergate Aldingbourne Community Sports Centre, Olivers Meadow, Westergate, PO20 3YA 3 AANGBG Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village Angmering Community Centre, Foxwood Avenue, Angmering, BN16 4FU 4 AANGN1 Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village St. Margarets Church Hall, Arundel Road, Angmering, BN16 4JS 5 AANGN2 Angmering & Findon Angmering & Findon Angmering Angmering Village Angmering Village Hall, Station Road, Angmering, BN16 4HY 6 AANGS East Preston Angmering & Findon Angmering South Angmering East Preston Fire Station, North Lane, East Preston, BN16 1DA 7 AARU1 Arundel & Walberton Arundel & Courtwick Arundel Arundel Arundel Lido, Queen Street, Arundel, BN18 9JG After 02/05/19 The Lounge at Warwick Court was no 02/05/19 - Lounge at Warwick Court, Torton Hill Road, Arundel, BN18 9JQ longer available so we have found a suitable alternative 8 AARU2 Arundel & Walberton Arundel & Courtwick Arundel Arundel Lounge at Warwick Court, Torton Hill Road, Arundel, BN18 9JQ 23/05/19 - Arundel Baptist Church Hall, Torton Hill Road very nearby 9 ABAR Barnham Fontwell Barnham & Eastergate Barnham
    [Show full text]
  • A284 Lyminster Bypass Statement of Case
    THE WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL (A284 LYMINSTER BYPASS (NORTH)) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2020 and THE WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL (A284 LYMINSTER BYPASS (NORTH) CLASSIFIED ROAD) (SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2020 THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 THE ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 THE COMPULSORY PURCHASE (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2007 STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 2021 1 LIST OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT 3 2. THE ORDERS 3 3. BACKGROUND TO SCHEME 4 4. THE NEED FOR THE SCHEME 8 5. DESCRIPTION OF SCHEME 18 6. SCHEME IMPACTS 19 7. REASON FOR THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION AND SIDE ROADS ORDER 22 8. THE EXTENT OF THE SCHEME TO BE DISREGARDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSESSING COMPENSATION IN THE ‘NO-SCHEME WORLD’ 23 9. SIDE ROAD ALTERATIONS 23 10. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER LAND 23 11. NEGOTIATION WITH LAND OWNERS 24 12. PLANNING CONTEXT 29 13. SCHEME APROVALS 35 14. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE USE OF COMPULSORY PURCHASE POWERS 36 15. JUSTIFICATION FOR SIDE ROADS ORDER 38 16. THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 38 17. EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 40 18. OTHER REQUIRED APPLICATIONS, ORDERS AND CONSENTS AND ANY IMPEDIMENTS TO THE SCHEME 41 19. CONCLUSION 42 APPENDIX 1: RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS APPENDIX 2: LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 2 1. PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT 1.1. This document is the Statement of Case of West Sussex County Council (‘the Council’) as acquiring authority pursuant to Rules 7 and 16 of the Compulsory Purchase (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2007. Numbers in brackets in superscript in this Statement of Case refer to supporting documents listed at the end of this document.
    [Show full text]