DOCSLIB.ORG

Decisionspace® Production Publications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decisionspace® Production Publications PAPERS AND ARTICLES Production Operations Solving challenges.™ PAPERS AND ARTICLES STRATEGY AND BUSINESS VALUE 1. L. Reid, M. Szatny, W.D. Johnson, M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “Benchmarking, Asset Potential and Digital Energy” SPE Paper No. 159856. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, October 2012. 2 Halliburton. “Custom Landmark Solution Saves Petroamazonas Nearly $3 Million in First Ten Wells”. Landmark Solution in Action, 2012. 3. R. Hull, Halliburton. “Using Balanced Scorecarding in Mature Fields”. Published in the Hart Energy’s, April 2012. 4. M. Strathman, The Trinity Group; M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “Intelligent Energy and Other Industries – Lessons Learned”. SPE Paper No. 150152. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2012. 5. M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “The Future of Surveillance”. SPE Paper No. 150071. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Nether- lands, March 2012. 6. M. Szatny, M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “Integrating Business and Technical Workflows to Achieve Asset-Level Production Optimization”. Presented at Dassault SIMULIA Customer Conference in Providence, Rhode Island, USA, May 2010. 7. “Expectativa com o Primeiro Óleo”. Published in Brasil Energia, November 2011. 8. S. Sankaran, J. Lugo, A. Awasthi, G. Mijares, Halliburton. “The Promise and Challenges of Digital Oilfield Solutions – Lessons Learned from Global Implementa- tions and Future Directions”. SPE Paper No. 122855. Presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, April 2009. 9. J. Grable, B. Sanstrom, G. Wylie, SPE, Halliburton. “The Digital Asset: Connecting People, Technology, and Processes in a Collaborative Environment”. SPE Paper No. 122508. Presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, April 2009. 10. B. Gorucu, A. Awasthi, S. Sankaran, G. Mijares, Halliburton. ”A Downstream View of an Upstream Problem”. Published in the Hart’s E&P Magazine, November 2008. 11. M. Szatny, Halliburton. “Integrating Business and Technical Workflows Helps Achieve Asset-Level Production Optimization”. Presented at the Dassault SIMULIA Customer Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, USA and published in the World Oil Magazine, November 2008. 12. A. Brown, Halliburton. “Breathing New Life into Old Fields”. Published in the Hart’s E&P Magazine, August 2008. 13. L. Reid, D. Deaton, Halliburton. “Holistic Production Optimization Achieved One Workflow at a Time”. Published in the Journal of Petroleum Technology, April 2008. 14. A. Hickman, A. Guidry, S. Seaton, SPE, Halliburton. “Real-Time Collaboration - Efficient Problem Solving and Extending Resources”. SPE Paper No. 112141. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 2008. 15. M. Szatny, Halliburton. “Enabling Automated Workflows for Production”. SPE Paper No. 109859. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibi- tion, Anaheim, California, USA, November 2007. 16. Halliburton. “Monitoring and Models”. Published in the Digital Energy Journal, May/June, 2007. 17. R. Ella, L. Reid, D. Russell, D. Johnson, S. Davidson, Halliburton. “The Central Role and Challenges of Integrated Production Operations”. SPE Paper No. 99807. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 2006. 18. L-J. Ursem, J.H. Williams, SPE, Shell; N.M. Pellerin, SPE; D.H. Kaminski, SPE, Halliburton. “Real Time Operations Centers; The People Aspects of Drilling Decision Making”. SPE/IADC Paper No. 79893. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 2003. CHANGE MANAGEMENT 19. S.S. Rubio, M. Lochmann, Halliburton; L. Denver, D. Rees, Knowledge Reservoir. “Transformation and Change in Oil and Gas Production”. SPE Paper No. 150070. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2012. 20. J.W. Davidson, M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “The Psychology of Adopting Intelligent Energy: Lessons and Insights from Unexpected Places”. SPE Paper No. 149998. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2012. CASE STUDIES – StiMULATION 21. M. Strobel, G. Carvajal, M. Szatny, C. Peries, Halliburton. “Enabling Agile and Responsive Workflow Automation: A Hydraulic Fracture Design Case Study”. SPE Paper No. 150455. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2012. 22. G. Carvajal, M. Toro, M. Szatny, G. Robinson, J. Estrada, SPE, Halliburton. “Holistic Automated Workflows for Reservoir and Production Optimization”. SPE Paper No. 130205. Presented at the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition in Barcelona, Spain, June 2010. PAPERS AND ARTICLES CASE STUDIES – INTEGRATED OPERATIONS 23. C. Cruz Villanueva, C. Tapia, A. Calatayud, M. Benumea, Pemex; A. Garcia, V.H. Hernandez, J.A. Balcazar, T. Lotar, S. Purwar, J. Rodriguez, Halliburton. “Workflow Automation (WFA) for the Integrated Production Operations in the Macuspana Field”. SPE Paper No. 152234. Presented at the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, April 2012. 24. L. Machado, M. Costa, Halliburton; S. Correa, E. Regina, M. Herdeiro, Petrobras. “Enhance Platform Integrity by a Real-Time Equipment Monitoring Work- flow”. SPE Paper No. 152330. Presented at the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, April 2012. 25 J. Paulo, D.A. Taylor, O. Isichei, M. King, Chevron; G. Singh, Halliburton. “Transforming Operations with Real-Time Production Optimization and Reservoir Management: Case History Offshore Angola”. SPE Paper No. 143730. Presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, April 2011. 26. S. Sankaran, A. Awasthi, SPE, Halliburton; M. Olise, D. Meinert, SPE, Chevron. “Realizing Value from Implementing i-field™ in a Deepwater Greenfield in Off- shore Nigeria Development”. SPE Paper No. 127691. Published in the SPE Journal, January 2011 and presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2010. 27. J. Rebeschini, A. Garcia, A. Lima, S. Purwar, Halliburton; L. Carbone, M. Dinis, M. Herdeiro, Petrobras. “Integrated Optimization System for Short-Term Pro- duction Operations Analysis”. SPE Paper No. 138436. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Lima, Peru, December 2010. 28. T. Dutra, L. Machado, M. Rodriguez, I. Almeida, Halliburton; B. Montanha, M. Manzali, M. Dinis, L. Carbone, M.F. de Souza, M. Herdeiro, Petrobras. “Monitoring and Optimizing Oil Fields by a Real-Time Production Operation (RTPO) System”. SPE Paper No. 138316. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Lima, Peru, December 2010. 29. A. Garcia, J. Rebeschini, D. Martins, C. Vieira, Halliburton; F. Nunes, E. da Silva, M. Herdeiro, Petrobras. “Enhanced Reservoir Scenarios Management Workflow”. SPE Paper No. 132983. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, October 2010. 30. A. Garcia, L. Machado, G. Singh, D. Martins, Halliburton; P.S. de Sousa, M. Herdeiro, Petrobras. “Methodology for Oil Production-Loss Control in a Digital Oilfield Implementation”. SPE Paper No. 127517. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 2010. 31. O.S. Adeyemi, SPE; S.G. Shryock, SPE, Chevron; S. Sankaran, SPE, Halliburton; O. Hostad, StatoilHydro; J. Gontijo, Petrobras. “Implementing i-field Initiatives in a Deepwater Green Field, Offshore Nigeria”. SPE Paper No. 115367. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, September 2008. 32. A. Garcia, G. Mijares, J. Rodriguez, S. Sankaran, L. Saputelli, SPE, Halliburton. “Real Time Operations in Asset Performance Workflows”. SPE Paper No. 111990. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 2008. DATA MANAGEMENT 33. C. Peries, M. Lochmann, Halliburton. “Pragmatic Production Data Management: A Framework for Exploring Data Management Strategies”. Presented at 13th International Conference on Petroleum Data Integration, Information and Data Management, May 2009. ARCHITECTURE AND ALGORITHMS 34. D. Herrera, J. Avelino, J. Sánchez, O. Diaz, A, Galán, Pemex; C. Bravo, J. Rodriguez, Halliburton; M. Torre, Acovis. “Automation Master Plan Framework: Case Study”. SPE Paper No. 152675. Presented at the SPE Latin American and the Caribbean Petroleum Energy Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, April 2012. 35. C. Peries, Halliburton. “SOA Removes Traditional E&P Barriers to Production Optimization”. Zeus Technology Magazine, October 2008. 36. A. Awasthi, University of Houston; M. Nikolaou, SPE, University of Houston; L. Saputelli, SPE; S. Sankaran, G. Mijares, SPE, Halliburton. “Meeting the Challenges of Real Time Production Optimization - A Parametric Model-Based Approach”. SPE Paper No. 111853. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Con- ference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 2008. 37. D. Johnson, Halliburton. “The Role and Development of the Operational Asset Optimization Model within DecisionSpace® for Production™ Solutions”. Landmark White Paper, May 2007. 38. A. Awasthi, University of Houston; M. Nikolaou, SPE, University of Houston; L. Saputelli, SPE; S. Sankaran,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Operations Another Tool for Achieving Operational Excellence in the Oil and Gas Sector Rosmaini Tasmin, Muazu Hassan Muazu, Lai Fong Woon, Josu Takala
    International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249–8958, Volume-9, Issue-1, October 2019 Integrated Operations another Tool for Achieving Operational Excellence in the Oil and Gas Sector Rosmaini Tasmin, Muazu Hassan Muazu, Lai Fong Woon, Josu Takala It is a known fact that an effective OpEx program Abstract: Activities of the oil and gas sector operations are improves the production yield of organisational assets and highly complex, from oil rigs to refining and transportation. It is people, reduces the cost of production, improves quality and against this backdrop that companies opt for operational flexibility of operations [4]. There are still issues on health, excellence to control the complexities, of which failure to manage safety and environment (HSE), also problems related to cost the situation, assets, peoples and profit could be lost. This paper and process efficiency and above all assets and process is aimed at determining how integrated operations influences operational excellence in the oil and gas sector. This is with a reliability are another challenges facing the oil sector in view to help in facilitating effective operational excellence Malaysia. According to [2] and [5], one approach available implementation in the oil industry. Quantitavive survey research for operators in the oil and gas sector to overcome most of approach was adopted, questionnaire was used to collect data these challenges is the adoption of the digital oilfield, also from 120 respondents. The result shows that all the postulated known as integrated operations (IO). This according to integrated operations factors have significant effect on Bigliani would enhance reservoir recoverability, increase operational excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Icts in the OIL SECTOR
    Chapter 4 ICTs IN THE OIL SECTOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPING ECONOMIES A. Introduction This is in particular pertinent to developing and transition countries whether they are oil exporters, or major or low-income oil importers. Oil exporters Oil is the main non-renewable source of energy that DUH LQWHUHVWHG LQ PD[LPL]LQJ WKH EHQHÀWV RI XVLQJ is currently “fuelling” the world economy. In spite of ICTs. Oil importers, as they further increase their oil many efforts to develop renewable energy sources, consumption, particularly China and India, are interested which have been further stimulated by major increases in being able to buy petroleum1 at better prices and in international crude oil prices during last few years, the use it effectively. Reducing price volatility is especially share of such sources in global energy consumption is important for developing countries’ importers, from still marginal. Conventional wisdom suggests that the ORZLQFRPHHFRQRPLHVDVWKH\KDYHPRUHGLIÀFXOWLHV world economy will continue to be highly dependent in coping with oil price shocks. Thus, determining the on oil and gas: while in coming decades the share of role of ICTs in the oil sector could be crucial for better gas might increase considerably and eventually surpass assessing the economic development perspectives of that of oil, the latter will still play a major role in the developing countries in the coming decades. world energy balance. ICTs and modern petroleum technologies (which are also Increased oil prices, together with global warming, are becoming information - intensive technologies) provide FRQVLGHUHGWREHDFKDQJHRI ÀUVWRUGHUIRUWKHZRUOG new opportunities to improve economic performance economy. In particular, the oil industry itself has an at all stages of the oil supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Operations Capgemini’S Solution
    Energy, Utilities and Chemicals the way we do it Integrated Operations Capgemini’s Solution Integrated Operations today and into the wider world of the National Called Smart Fields®, eFields, iFields, Oil Companies (NOCs) – for example ‘Digital’ Oil Fields, Field of the Future™ Petrobras and Aramco have highly or Integrated Operations (IO), these developed IO programs. We are also initiatives are aimed at creating value starting to see further developments by bringing together the organization’s in the service sector where product people, processes, and technology companies such as Baker Hughes, ISS to deliver and act on frequently- Group Ltd, and Petroleum Experts captured data in real-time. IO improves begin to understand the value that production, drives recovery, reduces Systems Integrators, such as Capgemini, cost, and optimizes work processes and can bring to major IO programs – hence productivity. primarily through our rigorous program management skills, our understanding IO is today one of the industry’s of change management, and integration ‘hot-spots’; the leading companies are of legacy systems. harnessing its potential, fast becoming a truly networked ecosystem and building The industry IO experiments of the the capability for next generation. IO past are now completed, with many has developed from being the preserve companies accepting IO as ‘business as of some of the oil and gas companies usual’. – such as BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips Key Offers Integrated Operations is cost reduction, work process efficiency and volumetric Capgemini’s IO offers cover the full improvement via ... IO program management, with the capability to address all areas, such as IO assessment, IO strategy development Operational including project roadmaps and business Fully Integrated Real-time and Financial case development.
    [Show full text]
  • SINOPEC Engineering (Group) Co., Ltd. (A Joint Stock Limited Liability Company Incorporated in the People’S Republic of China)
    Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and the Securities and Futures Commission take no responsibility for the contents of this Web Proof Information Pack, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Web Proof Information Pack. Web Proof Information Pack relating to SINOPEC Engineering (Group) Co., Ltd. (a joint stock limited liability company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China) WARNING This Web Proof Information Pack is being published as required by The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Hong Kong Stock Exchange”) and the Securities and Futures Commission solely for the purpose of providing information to the public in Hong Kong. This Web Proof Information Pack is in draft form. The information contained in it is incomplete and is subject to change which can be material. THIS WEB PROOF INFORMATION PACK MAY NOT BE UPDATED UNTIL A PROSPECTUS REGISTERED WITH THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES IS ISSUED BY SINOPEC ENGINEERING (GROUP) CO., LTD. (the “Company”), WHICH WILL BE POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE. By viewing this Web Proof Information Pack, you acknowledge, accept and agree with the Company, any of its affiliates, sponsors and advisers, and the members of the underwriting syndicate that: a. this Web Proof Information Pack is only for the purpose of facilitating equal dissemination of information to investors in Hong Kong and not for any other purposes. No investment decision should be based on the information contained in this Web Proof Information Pack; b.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Planning Framework for Nuclear Plant Transformation
    INL/EXT-20-59537 Analysis and Planning Framework for Nuclear Plant Transformation August 2020 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-20-59537 Analysis and Planning Framework for Nuclear Plant Transformation Ken Thomas, Jason Remer, Craig Primer Idaho National Laboratory Don Bosnic, Henry Butterworth, Charles Edwards, Gene Foote Xcel Energy, Inc. Asgeir Drøivoldsmo, Grete Rindahl, Robert McDonald Institute for Energy Technology Sean Lawrie, Ed Baker ScottMadden, Inc. August 2020 Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 http://www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Engineering Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 ii iii ABSTRACT Commercial nuclear power in the U.S. has been an unqualified success by any measure, providing safe, low-cost, carbon-free baseload electricity for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Halliburton Awarded $300 Million Contract for Integrated Drilling and Formation Evaluation Services by Conocophillips
    Halliburton Awarded $300 Million Contract for Integrated Drilling and Formation Evaluation Services By ConocoPhillips May 3, 2004 HOUSTON & TANANGER, Norway, May 3, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Halliburton has been awarded a contract for 3 years by ConocoPhillips to provide integrated drilling services for their North Sea activities. The contract, awarded to Sperry-Sun includes two additional options up to 3 years each. The contract is one of the first awarded by ConocoPhillips covering all their North Sea operations. The value of the contract is estimated to be $130 million for the fixed 3-years duration, and includes the provision of directional drilling, measurement-while-drilling (MWD), logging-while-drilling (LWD), mud logging and surveying services. "Halliburton is very pleased to have been awarded this significant contract, which expands our important relationship with ConocoPhillips," said John Gibson, president and CEO Halliburton Energy Services Group. "We have invested people, time, and money to stay at the forefront of technology development and ensure a sustainable future, aimed at meeting our customers and their customers' future needs." Fundamental to this contract is the Geo-Pilot(R) system, Sperry-Sun's second-generation point-the-bit rotary steerable service that was designed in collaboration with JOGMEC (Japan Oil, Gas, and Metals National Corporation). The ability to remotely control the Geo-Pilot rotary steerable system has been successfully demonstrated from the ConocoPhillips Onshore Drilling Center (ODC). This is an important step towards integrated operations, allowing the directional driller to be based in the ODC and work closer with the subsurface teams. Technologies also significant to this contract include the Stellar(TM) MWD/LWD formation evaluation suite of sensors, which includes the BAT(TM) bi-modal acoustic tool, ALD(TM) azimuthal lithodensity sensor, CTN(TM) compensated thermal neutron sensor, and GeoTap(R) formation pressure tester.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress
    Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 17, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41153 Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The diminishment of Arctic sea ice has led to increased human activities in the Arctic, and has heightened interest in, and concerns about, the region’s future. The United States, by virtue of Alaska, is an Arctic country and has substantial interests in the region. The seven other Arctic states are Canada, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark (by virtue of Greenland), and Russia. The Arctic Research and Policy Act (ARPA) of 1984 (Title I of P.L. 98-373 of July 31, 1984) “provide[s] for a comprehensive national policy dealing with national research needs and objectives in the Arctic.” The National Science Foundation (NSF) is the lead federal agency for implementing Arctic research policy. The Arctic Council, created in 1996, is the leading international forum for addressing issues relating to the Arctic. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) sets forth a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world’s oceans, including the Arctic Ocean. The United States is not a party to UNCLOS. Record low extents of Arctic sea ice over the past decade have focused scientific and policy attention on links to global climate change and projected ice-free seasons in the Arctic within decades. These changes have potential consequences for weather in the United States, access to mineral and biological resources in the Arctic, the economies and cultures of peoples in the region, and national security.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report
    Schlumberger Limited 42 rue Saint-Dominique 75007 Paris 2014 Annual Report 5599 San Felipe, 17th Floor Schlumberger Limited Houston, Texas 77056 62 Buckingham Gate London SW1E 6AJ Parkstraat 83 2514 JG The Hague www.slb.com 72795schD1R4.indd 3-3 2/16/15 9:59 AM Board of Directors Corporate Officers Corporate Information Peter L.S. Currie 1, 2 Paal Kibsgaard Stockholder Information Duplicate Mailings President, Currie Capital LLC Chief Executive Officer Schlumberger’s common stock When a stockholder owns shares Palo Alto, California is listed on the New York Stock in more than one account, or Simon Ayat Exchange, trading symbol “SLB,” when stockholders live at the same Tony Isaac 2, 4 Executive Vice President and and on the Euronext Paris, London address, duplicate mailings may Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Chief Financial Officer and the SIX Swiss Stock Exchanges. result. If you receive duplicate Schlumberger reports, you can help eliminate the London, England Alexander C. Juden For quarterly earnings dividend added expense by requesting that Secretary and General Counsel announcements, and other informa- only one copy be sent. To elimi- K. Vaman Kamath 1, 3 tion, call 1-800-997-5299 from the nate duplicate mailings, contact Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Ashok Belani US and Canada and 1-813-774-5043 Computershare Trust Company, N.A., ICICI Bank Limited Executive Vice President Technology for callers outside North America or Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar. Mumbai, India visit www.slb.com/ir. Jean-François Poupeau Nonprofit Community V. Maureen Kempston Darkes 1 Executive Vice President Corporate Stock Transfer Agent Development Programs Former Group Vice President Development and Communications and Registrar Schlumberger supports and General Motors Corporation Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • IGCC Gas Turbines for Refinery Applications
    GER-4219 g GE Power Systems IGCC Gas Turbines for Refinery Applications Robert M. Jones Norman Z. Shilling GE Power Systems Schenectady, NY 12345 IGCC Gas Turbines for Refinery Applications Contents Abstract. 1 Introduction . 1 IGCC Refinery Experience. 3 Gas Turbine Advancements . 6 Fuel Flexibility . 7 Environmental Performance. 11 GE IGCC Gas Turbine Product Line . 13 Economic Considerations. 15 Conclusion . 15 List of Figures. 16 GE Power Systems I GER-4219 I (05/03) i GE Power Systems I GER-4219 I (05/03) ii IGCC Gas Turbines for Refinery Applications Abstract deal with a wide range of solid and liquid fuels has been demonstrated in refinery applications Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle fueled by heavy oil and petroleum coke (IGCC) plant designs are successfully operating residues—integrated with systems providing and meeting challenging service requirements both power generation and chemical co-pro- at several world-class refinery locations around duction. Current gas turbine combustion con- the globe. Advancements in gasification, air trol systems provide for full or combined “co-fir- separation, syngas cleanup, and gas turbine ing” of synthesis gas with natural gas or distillate combined cycle equipment designs have con- back-up fuels. tributed to continuous improvements in system performance and operating characteristics. To date, GE gas turbines have accumulated These improvements enhance the prospect for more than 499,000 fired hours on synthesis fuel continued growth in the IGCC refinery seg- gas (of which 132,000 hours were fired on syn- ment. Today's challenge for IGCC systems is to gas derived from refinery feedstocks). This meet market requirements (which demand broad experience—enabled in large part by lower capital costs, improved operating reliabil- developments in gas turbine technology— ity, and increased fuel flexibility) in combina- serves as a superb entitlement for environmen- tion with increasing efficiency and environmen- tally superior value generation from poor quali- tal performance standards.
    [Show full text]
  • International Oil Companies the Death of the Old Business Model
    Research Paper Paul Stevens Energy, Environment and Resources | May 2016 International Oil Companies The Death of the Old Business Model Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 4 2 What is the Old IOC Business Model? 9 3 What are the Signs That the Old Model is No Longer Working? 12 4 Why Has the Old Model Been Failing? 14 5 Would the Failure of the IOCs’ Business Model Matter? 30 6 What are the Possible Solutions Available to the IOCs? 32 7 Conclusion 37 Bibliography 38 Acknowledgments 43 About the Author 44 1 | Chatham House International Oil Companies: The Death of the Old Business Model Summary The future of the major international oil companies (IOCs) – BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell and Total – is in doubt. The business model that sustained them during the 20th century is no longer fit for purpose. As a result, they are faced with the choice of managing a gentle decline by downsizing or risking a rapid collapse by trying to carry on business as usual. Most commentary on the IOCs’ problems has focused on the recent fall in oil prices and the growing global commitment to tackle climate change. Important though these are, the source of their predicament is not confined to such recent developments over which they have no control. Their problems are more numerous, run deeper and go back further. The prognosis for the IOCs was already grim before governments became serious about climate change and the oil price collapsed. The most recent iteration of the IOCs’ business model emerged during the 1990s and was built upon three pillars: maximizing shareholder value based on a strategy that provided benchmarks for financial returns, maximizing bookable reserves and minimizing costs partly based on outsourcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Roadmap to Integrated Operations
    Building a Roadmap to Integrated Operations RESULTS As Upstream Oil and Gas Operations become more complex and PROCESSES costly to operate, new and innovative ways of working are needed to maintain and improve profi tability. The operating model that MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS is emerging across the industry, that has the potential to LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOR tackle both the complexity and costs, is the concept of Integrated Operations (IO). CHANGE & LEARNING Organizational SpaceTM Whether it’s operating multiple offshore platforms, a vast operators have redesigned their systems, processes, structures geographical gas fi eld or several SAGD Facilities, Operators are and technologies in order to reduce the number of personnel turning to IO in different ways to address similar challenges. actually on site (e.g., on an offshore platform, a processing plant While some Operators are far down the path of IO, others are or in the fi eld at well sites) and perform daily monitoring and travelling to Europe to investigate what potential it has for their management of the asset from a distant location. Lastly, there business, establish some common defi nition and clarify why are organizations that interpret IO as the way in which they the journey to IO ought to be undertaken. Fundamental to this have tied their upstream hydrocarbon producing activities with investigation is to be clear on the expected results. midstream operations and, ultimately, with downstream refi ning Is it reduced cost? Reliability and uptime? Reduced exposure? and export. Another way of describing this is vertical integration. Currently there seems to be little clarity or consistency on the Evolve views IO as a combination of the fi rst two senses: vision for the “end state” of the journey, with some having a bias In the context of oil and gas production, Integrated towards the technology solution and others with a bias towards Operations is a particular operating model that the organizational solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Based Oil and Gas Industry
    Knowledge Based Oil and Gas Industry by Amir Sasson and Atle Blomgren Research Report 3/2011 BI Norwegian Business School Department of Strategy and Logistics Amir Sasson and Atle Blomgren: Knowledge Based Oil and Gas Industry © Amir Sasson and Atle Blomgren 2011 Forskningsrapport 03/2011 ISSN: 0803‐2610 BI Norwegian Business School N‐0442 Oslo Phone: 4641 0000 www.bi.no Print: Nordberg BI’s Research Reports may be ordered from our website www.bi.no/en/research‐publications. Executive Summary This study presents the Norwegian upstream oil and gas industry (defined as all oil and gas- related firms located in Norway, regardless of ownership) and evaluates the industry according to the underlying dimensions of a global knowledge hub - cluster attractiveness, education attractiveness, talent attractiveness, R&D and innovation attractiveness, ownership attractiveness, environmental attractiveness and cluster dynamics. The Norwegian oil and gas industry was built upon established Norwegian competences in mining (geophysics), maritime operations and maritime construction (yards), with invaluable inputs from foreign operators and suppliers. At present, the industry is a complete cluster of 136,000 employees divided into several sectors: Operators (22,000), Geo & Seismics (4,000), Drill & Well (20,000), Topside (43,000), Subsea (13,000) and Operations Support (34,000). The value creation from operators and suppliers combined represents one-third of total Norwegian GDP (2008). The Norwegian oil and gas industry has for many years been a highly attractive cluster in terms of technical competence. The last ten years have also seen improvements in terms of access to capital and quality of financial services provided.
    [Show full text]