On the Mythological and the Monographic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
On the Mythological and the Monographic The Single-Artist Museum and the Notion of Genius Master Thesis Author: Megan Mullarky Student number: 10869808 Supervisor: Dr. Rachel Esner Second Reader: Dos Elshout University of Amsterdam Heritage Studies: Museum Studies Word Count: 22,919 2 December 2016 1 Table of Contents Preface…………………………………………………………..………………………………...…………...…….3 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………….…………….….………….4 0. Introduction 0.1 Introduction to Topic…………………….………...………………..….………………………5 0.2 State of the Research………………………………………………….…………...……………6 0.3 Research Question and Framework……………………………..……………....……….7 1. Artistic Genius and its Role in Art Historical Discourse 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...…………9 1.2 Immanuel Kant and the Definition of Genius…………………………..……..…….10 1.3 Biography, Mythologization, and the Inexplicable……………………..…………15 1.4 The Early Twentieth Century: Diversity and Discontent……..………….…….17 1.5 Barthes: Rupture and Legacy……………………………………………………..……….22 1.6 The Aftermath of the Death of the Author………………………….…..……...…….24 1.7 The Era of Criticism………………………………………...………………………….………28 2. Case Study 1: Musée National Picasso 2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………31 2.2 The Formation of the Musée National Picasso…………………...............………..32 2.3 The Mythologies at Stake: Narcissist, Misogynist, Mystery…………..……….38 2.4 Mythologies in the Museum: Musée Picasso circa 1985………….……….……42 2.5 Musée Picasso 2014: Renovations and Reconsiderations……………………..46 2.6 Conclusions………………………….………………………………………………………...….49 3. Case Study 2: Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam 3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………55 3.2 The Formation of the Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam………………….……….56 3.3 The Mythologies at Stake: Martyr, Lunatic, Saint…………………….……………62 3.4 Mythologies in the Museum: Van Gogh Museum circa 1973…………….…...68 3.5 Van Gogh Museum circa 2014: Renovations and Reconsiderations…........72 3.6 Conclusions………..……………..………………………………………………………….……77 4. Conclusion 4.1 Results and Interpretations……………...………..……………………………………….81 Images………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………….86 Literature……………………………………………………………………………………………………….103 2 Preface During my bachelor’s degree in art history in the United States, I became extremely interested in the problematic aspects of biographical art history and how to deal with the identity of artists in my own practice. I constantly asked myself, why does any of this matter? Can I, or anyone else, really give a good reason for studying the identity or authorship of artists as interpretative material for their works? It was my continued interest in this problem that inspired this thesis project. Fascinated by the way in which monographic museums of celebrity artists must deal with the issue of artistic identity, yet slightly frustrated at times that the museum world did not seem to notice the challenges going on in these institutions, I felt compelled to write about these issues. I chose the following case studies specifically according to my interests and expertise. Because I completed an eight-month internship at the Van Gogh Museum, it was a highly accessible choice for me to conduct a case study. The Musée Picasso, on the other hand, was simply an institution which I had previously found both beautiful and problematic, a great combination for my interest in a case study. I hope in this thesis to provoke more interest and attention towards monographic institutions today, and show also that the issue of authorship and identity in art museums remains an extremely complicated challenge. I thoroughly hope that you enjoy reading my findings. Megan Mullarky 3 Acknowledgements During the research period of this project, there were many people at the University of Amsterdam, Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam, and Musée National Picasso whose assistance enormously improved the results of this study. Most importantly, I would like to thank Dr. Rachel Esner at the University of Amsterdam, whose close guidance and inspirational attitude truly made this project possible. I would also like to thank those who were willing to be sit through long interviews, namely Leo Jansen at the Mondrian Edition Project, whom I thank for his deep interest in this topic and openness to exchange ideas. However, I would also like to thank Nienke Bakker, Joost van der Hoeven, Edwin Becker, and Renske Suijver at the Van Gogh Museum for offering assistance when needed and access to the Van Gogh Museum archives. At the Musée National Picasso I would like to express my thanks to Émilie Bouvard, who was willing to be interviewed and direct me towards the correct information in the extensive Musée Picasso archives. At the University of Amsterdam I would like to thank Dr. Dos Elshout, who guided my internship at the Van Gogh Museum and supported the development of this research idea. 4 0. Introduction 0.1 Introduction to Topic Art museums dedicated to the work of a single artist are today common occurrences in the landscape of the contemporary art world. Often called “monographic museums,” such institutions are generally dedicated to artist’s of a certain celebrity status. However, often overlooked by contemporary museum professionals and art historians are the fundamental differences in the historical development, ideological identity, and methodological strategies between monographic museums and today’s standard art museums. Most particularly unaccounted for, in fact, is that in comparison to the freedom of a typical art museum to innovatively design their display of a collection originating from a variety of artists, monographic museums lack such liberties due to their investment in the display of the life and work of only a single artist. The development of such institutions, in fact, are intrinsically bound to the historical notion of “artistic genius” and the mythologization1 of the artist in order to justify the veneration of a single historical figure through the establishment of such a museum. As a result, today’s monographic museums are often methodologically indebted to the notion of artistic genius, thereby occluding a variety of other methodological perspectives. This thesis will therefore present an investigation of the role of the historical notion of artistic genius and 1 The term “mythologization” will throughout this essay refer to the way in which biography and the notion of genius can be combined in the consideration of certain artists and therefore instigate the notion of the artist as “mythologized.” This process will be explained further in the first chapter of this thesis. 5 mythologization in two single artists museums: the Musée National Picasso and the Van Gogh Museum Amsterdam. 0.2 State of the Research Although the investigation of the ideological presence of the notion of artistic genius in monographic museums is the main topic of this study, the concept itself has been long popularized as a major research topic by the fields of philosophy, art history, museology, and anthropology. Considered the most significant instigator towards the trajectory of this scholarship, Roland Barthes’ 1967 text “The Death of the Author”2 stimulated throughout the twentieth century a profound interest in the examination of the author (or artist) as creative subject. The largely positive reception of Barthes’ text aroused not only a series of responsive essays, such as Michel Foucault’s “What is an Author?,”3 but also the interest of academics to continue to analyze the meaning of the author’s death in terms of a variety of methodological situations, identities, and disciplines. This process occurring in the twentieth century will be outlined in the first chapter of this thesis. In contrast, the broader landscape of monographic museums as institutional category is largely ignored, despite the fact that Europe is home to nearly fifty of such establishments. The single known account of the theoretical foundation of monographic museums is that found in the PhD dissertation of Maarten Liefooghe completed in 2013 at the University of Ghent, entitled, “De monographische factor: 2 Roland Barthes, “The Death of the Author,” English translation in Image, Music, Text by Stephen Heath, (1968), 141-148. 3 Foucault, Michel, “What is an Author?” English translation in Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, (Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1995). 6 theoretische en architecturale aspecten van kunstenaarsmusea.”4 This PhD project, sponsored by Bart Verschaffel en Wouter Davidts, explores the foundational aspects of the single-artist institution in terms of theory and architecture within the broader scope of the generalized aims of monographic museums. Liefooghe’s project can be considered the first of its type in its development of a theoretical survey of the monographic museum within the field of museology. However, this thesis will nonetheless differ fundamentally from Liefooghe’s in that the focus will not be on architecture, but rather, the specific museological strategies in the broadest sense utilized in the display of the permanent collection within which the notion of artistic genius plays a major role. 0.3 Research Question and Framework With respect to the state of the research, this thesis will answer the following question: How do contemporary monographic museums function in relation to the problematic history of the notion of the artistic genius and the process of mythologization of the author-figure? This question will be answered in three chapters. The first chapter will outline the