Oral History Interview With

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oral History Interview With Burke Marshall Oral History Interview – RFK, 1/19-20/1970 Administrative Information Creator: Burke Marshall Interviewer: Larry J. Hackman Date of Interview: January 19-20, 1970 Place of Interview: Bedford, N.Y. Length: 93 pages Biographical Note Marshall served as Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (1961-1964); general counsel of International Business Machines Corp. (1965-1969); and as an adviser to Robert F. Kennedy (RFK). In this interview, he discusses his work on civil rights issues with RFK during their time in the Department of Justice and afterwards; the FBI’s use of wiretapping and other electronic surveillance against Martin Luther King, Jr.; and RFK’s 1964 campaign for the Senate, and 1968 campaign for president, among other issues. Access Restrictions Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed March 27, 1972, copyright of these materials has passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewee. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F. Kennedy Library. The transcripts were scanned using optical character recognition and the resulting text files were proofread against the original transcripts. Some formatting changes were made. Page numbers are noted where they would have occurred at the bottoms of the pages of the original transcripts. If researchers have any concerns about accuracy, they are encouraged to visit the library and consult the transcripts and the interview recordings. Suggested Citation Burke Marshall, recorded interview by Larry J. Hackman, January 19-20, 1970, (page number), John F. Kennedy Library Oral History Program. Burke Marshall—RFK Table of Contents Page Topic 1 Press coverage of Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) and the Justice Department 5, 33 Civil rights legislation 6 RFK’s feelings about his oral histories and the Kennedy Library oral history project 7 Working relationship with RFK 8 Justice Department work on District of Columbia matters 9 Justice Department Antitrust Division 10 RFK’s relationship with other Justice officials 11 RFK’s working habits and administrative style 13 Possibility of RFK becoming secretary of state if John F. Kennedy (JFK) had lived 14, 17 Federal judgeships 15 Voting rights and school desegregation lawsuits 22 President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity 25 Harris L. Wofford, Jr. 26 Civil Rights Commission 28 Ending discrimination in federally financed housing 30 RFK’s relationship with civil rights leaders 31 RFK’s relationship with Congress as attorney general 35, 47 Wiretapping and electronic surveillance 41, 90 FBI electronic surveillance of Martin Luther King, Jr., and attempts to discredit him 46 RFK’s feelings about and relationship with Martin Luther King, Jr. 50 Bobby Baker investigation 51 Jimmy Hoffa and organized crime’s influence on the labor movement 52 Contempt of court case against Ross R. Barnett 53 Possibility of RFK as vice president in 1964 55 Paul Corbin 56 RFK’s 1964 senate campaign 58 Nicholas deB. Katzenbach’s appointment as attorney general 59 Marshall’s post-Justice Department career 60 Voting Rights Act of 1965 63 Congressional reapportionment and the Gray vs. Sanders Supreme Court case 64 Overseeing Evelyn N. Lincoln and other JFK presidential papers issues 65 RFK’s efforts to promote business investment in urban areas 68 Attempts to get business endorsement for RFK in 1968 70 William Manchester’s book The Death of a President 74 Warren Commission and other JFK assassination investigations 75 Vietnam War after JFK’s death 77 Riots in the U.S. in the late 1960s 78 RFK’s decision to run for president in 1968 86 RFK’s 1968 presidential campaign 87 Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination 88 Attempts to get endorsements for RFK in 1968 from black leaders 91 Presidential debate between RFK and Eugene J. McCarthy 92 Effect of JFK’s assassination on RFK 93 RFK’s feelings about Lyndon B. Johnson Oral History Interview with Burke Marshall January 19-20, 1970 Bedford, N.Y. By Larry J. Hackman For the Robert F. Kennedy Oral History Program of the Kennedy Library HACKMAN: I just wanted to ask you, just to start off with, to sort of put those Tony Lewis [Anthony Lewis] interviews that you and Robert Kennedy [Robert F. Kennedy] did in sort of a frame of reference. Can you remember Robert Kennedy‘s impressions of those interviews, the way they came out, pleased or displeased or…? MARSHALL: I don‘t know whether he ever read them. I don‘t recall. They were incomplete, and I think that he may have indicated where he thought they were incomplete. But, otherwise, I don‘t remember any… HACKMAN: Yeah. MARSHALL: …reaction. HACKMAN: What can you remember of just about the development of his relationship with Tony Lewis and the New York Times, really, since the New York Times had had sort of a special relationship under Eisenhower [Dwight D. Eisenhower]? Do you remember how that worked out? What changes were made? MARSHALL: When Robert Kennedy was appointed attorney general, Tony Lewis took sort of a personal affront. He didn‘t think much of Robert Kennedy at that point. I don‘t think he knew much, and I don‘t think he knew Bob Kennedy very well; but he thought he knew everything about the Justice Department, and so he had a good deal of advice to give about what appointments should be made in the Justice Department. Of course, that advice wasn‘t followed fully, although I suppose that Tony did know a lot of lawyers around Washington, and he did have some judgment about [-1-] them. But that wasn‘t a very good start, so it must have required some passage of time—I mean, as time went along he became very fond and very impressed with Robert Kennedy, and he was already a pretty good friend of some of the people in the Justice Department. He had been a friend of mine for some time before that. I don‘t know exactly when it changed, but the New York Times as an institution never did become much of a fan of Robert Kennedy—in fact, quite the opposite. Tony, himself, through his coverage of the Justice Department and you could tell by his books and his writings—was impressed with the way that Bob Kennedy affected the Justice Department. It was partly the people he brought in, but it wasn‘t just the people he brought in; it was really his own performance and his own impact on the career lawyers there, and the tremendous respect that people that Tony had respect for gave Bob Kennedy. And so, it was all of those things, but it didn‘t start off that way. HACKMAN: How did the relationship with the New York Times change from what it had been in the Eisenhower Administration when, you know, from what I‘ve heard, they had access to some things sooner than other papers? MARSHALL: Well, it may have been because of the press officer under Eisenhower. I can‘t remember his name, but I… HACKMAN: The guy who just wrote the book. Have you seen that? Praeger [Praeger Publishers] put out his book on the Justice Department, I believe. [The Justice Department, by Luther Huston]. MARSHALL: No. What is his name? HACKMAN: I can‘t remember the name either. I just looked at the book. MARSHALL: Well, I think he had something to do with the Times. I think he came from the Times. HACKMAN: Yes. Right. He had. MARSHALL: So Tony thought the New York Times should have special privilege and that‘s what the New York Times always thinks, anyway. HACKMAN: Yes. MARSHALL: And they didn‘t get that, of course. Ed Guthman [Edwin O. Guthman] didn‘t deal with reporters that way at all; so they were cut off from special treatment, and I guess Tony didn‘t like that. HACKMAN: Yes. MARSHALL: At the time of the appointments—you know, this was true of all [-2-] reporters—there was a game going on of how they could beat a story about the appointment. I didn‘t have anything much to do with them, and I didn‘t pay too much attention to it. I‘d see Tony, but Tony was always very fair with me; that is, he didn‘t try to pry that kind of a story out of me, ever. HACKMAN: Can you remember any of Robert Kennedy‘s general observations on who did do a good job of covering the Justice Department, and your own, particularly in the civil rights area? MARSHALL: I can‘t remember.
Recommended publications
  • House of Representatives the House Was Not in Session Today
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 147 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 No. 113 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 5, 2001, at 2 p.m. Senate TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was We express our profound sympathy to RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME called to order by the Honorable HARRY the family of former House of Rep- The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. DUR- REID, a Senator from the State of Ne- resentatives Chaplain, James Ford. BIN). Under the previous order, the vada. Comfort and bless them in this time of leadership time is reserved. grief and loss. You are our only Lord f PRAYER and Saviour. The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Amen. MORNING BUSINESS Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Gracious Father, You are the source f the previous order, there will now be a of strength when we trust You, the period for the transaction of morning source of courage when we ask for Your business not to extend beyond the hour help, the source of hope when we won- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE of 11 a.m. with Senators permitted to der if we can make a difference, the The Honorable HARRY REID led the speak for up to 10 minutes. Under the source of peace in the stresses and Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: previous order, the time until 10:30 strains of applying truth to the forma- a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Iqbal Brief: Barr Amicus Brief
    No. 07-1015 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ JOHN D. ASHCROFT, former Attorney General of the United States, and ROBERT MUELLER, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Petitioners, v. JAVAID IQBAL, et al., Respondents. __________ On Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit __________ BRIEF OF WILLIAM P. BARR, GRIFFIN BELL, BENJAMIN R. CIVILETTI, EDWIN MEESE III, WILLIAM S. SESSIONS, RICHARD THORNBURGH, AND WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS __________ Paul J. Larkin, Jr. Daniel J. Popeo 1314 Cleveland St. Richard A. Samp Alexandria, VA 22302 (Counsel of Record) (703) 931-1704 Washington Legal Foundation 2009 Mass. Ave, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 588-0302 Date: September 5, 2008 QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether a conclusory allegation that a cabinet-level officer or high-ranking official knew of, condoned, or agreed to subject a plaintiff to allegedly unconstitutional acts purportedly committed by subordinate officials is sufficient to state individual- capacity claims against those officials under Bivens. 2. Whether a cabinet-level officer or other high- ranking official may be held personally liable for the allegedly unconstitutional acts of subordinate officials on the ground that, as high-level supervisors, they had constructive notice of the discrimination allegedly carried out by such subordinate officials. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES................... iv INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE ...............1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE..................3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................5 ARGUMENT...............................11 I. THE DECISION BELOW IMPROPERLY PERMITS COMPLAINTS TO PROCEED TO DISCOVERY BASED ON MERE CONCLUSORY ASSERTIONS OF WRONGDOING.......................11 II.
    [Show full text]
  • BERKELEY SUMMER SESSIONS the Political Philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr
    Syllabus https://elearning.berkeley.edu/AngelUploads/Content/2013SUC... Printer Friendly Version BERKELEY SUMMER SESSIONS The Political Philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. (African American Studies 124, Summer Session 2013) about the course | materials | learning activities | grading | course policies | course outline About the Course Back to Top Course Description The life of Martin Luther King, Jr., provides a rare opportunity to understand the crucial issues of an era that shaped a good deal of contemporary America. As that era’s greatest leader, King’s life helps us both focus history and humanize it. As a profound thinker, as well as an activist, King epitomizes the interdependence of academic excellence and social responsibility. By examining the forces that shaped King’s life and his impact on society, we should gain some sense of history and historical possibility. By critically reviewing his political philosophy we should gain some appreciation of its depth and relevance for today. Recently, for example, protesters in Egypt were singing "We Shall Overcome." Each student will be expected to fully participate in the course including daily reading, watching the multimedia lecture presentations, engaging in interaction with the graduate student instructors and professor, posting short essays to a discussion board, interacting with peers in study sections, writing a critical book review of the Tyson book, taking four quizzes, and completing the mid-term and final examinations. Each quiz will count ten points. The mid-term and final examinations will count 20 points each and the critical book review will count 20 points. Extensions and incompletes will only be granted in rare circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Panel, Under Attacks, Stands Firm on Its Findings in Kennedy Death 3 Years Ago
    1"ra NYTimes 22 Nov. 1966 Warren Panel, Under Attacks, Stands Firm on Its Findings in Kennedy Death 3 Years Ago new evidence to justify any re-+ chapter written for a French any portion thereof prior. to By PETER KIHSS consideration or any change in translation to be published by Nov. 22, 1968." On the third anniversary of the conclusions of the commis- !Editions Arthaud this week. A spokesman for Robert Ken- sion." In this Mr. Lane offered a President John F. Kennedy's, nedy, now Senator from New Another commissioner, Son- five-shot hypothesis. This would York, said yesterday -that Mr. assassination today, the two-' ateor John Sherman Cooper, Re- have a bul]gt strike President! Kennedy had no comment on year-old Warren Commission re publican of Kentucky, was on Kennedy in the back, and a the Kilduff charge. Mr. Man- port on his death is the subject his way home from Madrid to second bullet hit him in the chester was reported by The of intensive attacks. But com- Washington. But an associate throat from the front.' A third 'Associated- Press to be. travel- said the senator had been say- bullet would hit Governor Con- ling with his family in Europe mission members uphold their ing that everything brought up nally. A fourth would miss the findings that a 'lone assassin, and "unavailable for comment" in recent books and articles had President's limousine, but shat- Look magazine said, "we Lee Harvey Oswald, was guilty. been pursued and deliberated ter off a sideWalk curb to graze have received no request from Malcolm Kilduff, acting White over by the commission and tha a spectator, James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactive Waste Facility
    Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections http://archives.dickinson.edu/ Three Mile Island Resources Title: Three Mile Island Alert Newsletters, 1994 Date: 1994 Location: TMI-TMIA Contact: Archives & Special Collections Waidner-Spahr Library Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1399 [email protected] THREE MILE ISLAND June 1994 315 Peffer Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102-1834 Telephone: 717/233-3072 200+ Attend 15th Anniversary Conference More than 200 safe-energy activists from 20 states, several Indian nations, and five countries gathered here in late March to observe the 15th anniversary of the beginning of the accident at TMI. The event was organized by TMIA with assistance from several national safe-energy groups including NIRS, Public Citizen, Safe Energy Communications Council, Friends of the Earth, and Greenpeace. Over March 26 and 27 workshops were held dealing with nuclear waste issues, reactor decommis­ sioning, radiation monitoring, health effects, alternatives to nuclear power, the national nuclear policy, the proposed DOE energy budget (see below), reactor license renewal and safety deregula­ tion, the continuing TMI clean-up, and others designed to provide radioactivists with the skills neces­ sary to carry on the crusade for safe energy. Keynote speaker Ed Smeloff, the director of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), ex­ plained how SMUD closed the problem-plagued Rancho Seco reactor and how they now plan to make up for the power loss through aggressive energy conservation, efficiency, and renewable en­ ergy programs. Harrisburg's own Jane Perkins, now president of the Friends of the Earth, called for more grassroots activity across America with a focus on Washington, including a national safe-energy lobby day in Congress once or twice each year.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK Characters
    Page 1 JFK Characters As you start reading about the JFK John Abt assassination, you quickly realize that there are thousands of people involved John Abt was a lawyer for the Communist party. in one way or another. Keeping track of When LHO was arrested in Dallas, he asked for Abt who’s who gets to be a challenge. to represent him. LHO wasn’t a communist or That’s why I created this list of some of marxist, but he pretended to be as part of his CIA the major (and minor) players in the undercover assignment. Asking to have Abt as his complex story. It is designed to give lawyer was intended to be a signal to his you a quick idea of the most relevant intelligence handlers that his cover was still intact facts about each of the characters and that he was still playing along. He wanted his listed, and it is intended as a quick handlers to know that they could count on his reference tool. (However, just reading silence. down the list of characters is one way to get a lot of information about the events of November 22, 1963, in Juan Adames Dallas, Texas.) Juan Adames provided information to HSCA It is by no means complete, as that is (House Select Committee on Investigations) beyond my scope. But I do plan to keep investigator Gaeton Fonzi, working in Miami. adding characters as I learn more Adames told Fonzi about Bernardo Gonzales de about the death of JFK. Torres Alvarez (de Torres), who had been working for CIA since 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTHONY HILL, BLACK LIVES MATTER, and DSA by Adam Cardo
    ANTHONY HILL, BLACK LIVES MATTER, AND DSA By Adam Cardo first became involved with DSA in the fall of 2014, as part of outside his apartment by DeKalb County Police officer Robert my larger political realignment brought on by the Black Lives Olson in March of 2015. Local activist groups who led the Matter movement. After spending the summer volunteering protest included Rise Up Georgia and #It’sBiggerThanYou, as for a moderate Democrat in Georgia, I began a semester at well as myself and several fellow Atlanta DSA members. We American University in Washington D.C., taking classes while also collected funds for the cause at our Socialist Dialogue. After interningI for another moderate Democrat. Fully enmeshed in an initial protest outside Hill’s neighborhood, activists focused mainstream “progressive” politics, I was all set to become a their efforts on securing an indictment of the accused officer neo-liberal Democratic Party apparatchik. However, two events with marches and rallies. The struggle culminated in a 3-day transpired to lead me camp-out outside the to the socialist light. DeKalb County The first was my courthouse during involvement with the the week of January Metro Washington 17th. The officer was D.C. DSA chapter, successfully indicted which I discovered on all six counts through a mutual against him. a c q u a i n t a n c e . The events The other crucial surrounding Anthony event was the non- Hill show the power indictment of the of Black Lives Matter police officers who in countering the murdered Eric Garner.
    [Show full text]
  • Fewer Hands, More Mercy: a Plea for a Better Federal Clemency System
    FEWER HANDS, MORE MERCY: A PLEA FOR A BETTER FEDERAL CLEMENCY SYSTEM Mark Osler*† INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 465 I. A SWAMP OF UNNECESSARY PROCESS .................................................. 470 A. From Simplicity to Complexity ....................................................... 470 B. The Clemency System Today .......................................................... 477 1. The Basic Process ......................................................................... 477 a. The Pardon Attorney’s Staff ..................................................... 478 b. The Pardon Attorney ................................................................ 479 c. The Staff of the Deputy Attorney General ................................. 481 d. The Deputy Attorney General ................................................... 481 e. The White House Counsel Staff ................................................ 483 f. The White House Counsel ......................................................... 484 g. The President ............................................................................ 484 2. Clemency Project 2014 ................................................................ 485 C. The Effect of a Bias in Favor of Negative Decisions ...................... 489 II. BETTER EXAMPLES: STATE AND FEDERAL .......................................... 491 A. State Systems ................................................................................... 491 1. A Diversity
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Harris Wofford by Brien Williams
    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons George J. Mitchell Oral History Project Special Collections and Archives 6-12-2009 Interview with Harris Wofford by Brien Williams Harris L. Wofford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/mitchelloralhistory Part of the Law and Politics Commons, Oral History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wofford, Harris L., "Interview with Harris Wofford by Brien Williams" (2009). George J. Mitchell Oral History Project. 4. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/mitchelloralhistory/4 This Interview is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections and Archives at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in George J. Mitchell Oral History Project by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. George J. Mitchell Oral History Project Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, 3000 College Sta., Brunswick, Maine 04011 © Bowdoin College Harris Wofford GMOH# 111 (Interviewer: Brien Williams) June 12, 2009 Brien Williams: This is an oral history interview with former Senator Harris Wofford for the George J. Mitchell Oral History Project at Bowdoin College. We are in the senator’s home in Washington, D.C., and today is Friday, June 12, 2009, and I am Brien Williams. I thought we might start with the steps that brought you to the Senate. Harris Wofford: To the Senate? BW: To the Senate, and my first question was, when did you learn of Senator Heinz’s death, and under what circumstances? HW: I was up having lunch with David Riesman, a sociologist at Harvard, of fame; The Lonely Crowd is one of his great bestsellers.
    [Show full text]
  • Egrove March 8, 2016
    University of Mississippi eGrove Daily Mississippian Journalism and New Media, School of 3-8-2016 March 8, 2016 The Daily Mississippian Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline Recommended Citation The Daily Mississippian, "March 8, 2016" (2016). Daily Mississippian. 1277. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline/1277 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Journalism and New Media, School of at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Daily Mississippian by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuesday, March 8, 2016 THE DAILY Volume 104, No. 99 THE STUDENTMISSISSIPPIAN NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SERVING OLE MISS AND OXFORD SINCE 1911 Visit theDMonline.com @thedm_news lifestyles sports ‘House of Cards’ Spring training POLLS ARE OPEN TODAY Season 4 review readies Rebels for fall FROM 7AM-7PM Page 6 Page 12 Candidates employ last-minute efforts for votes PHOTO BY: CADY HERRING PHOTO BY: ASSOCIATED PRESS (ROGELIO V. SOLIS) Presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a rally in Madison, Miss., Monday, March 7, 2016. Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks during a campaign stop in Florence Monday. LANA FERGUSON Trump hosted a rally in a Madison Julie Wronski, UM political sci- ning the early primaries show that 151. Democrats need 2,383 dele- [email protected] high school, his second visit to the ence professor, attended Trump’s you’re still a viable candidate, that gates. Hillary Clinton has taken Magnolia state since his January rally Monday at Madison Central people are interested in you and the lead with 1,130 and Bernie trip to Biloxi.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Attorney General's Client?
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\87-3\NDL305.txt unknown Seq: 1 20-APR-12 11:03 WHO IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CLIENT? William R. Dailey, CSC* Two consecutive presidential administrations have been beset with controversies surrounding decision making in the Department of Justice, frequently arising from issues relating to the war on terrorism, but generally giving rise to accusations that the work of the Department is being unduly politicized. Much recent academic commentary has been devoted to analyzing and, typically, defending various more or less robust versions of “independence” in the Department generally and in the Attorney General in particular. This Article builds from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, in which the Court set forth key principles relating to the role of the President in seeing to it that the laws are faithfully executed. This Article draws upon these principles to construct a model for understanding the Attorney General’s role. Focusing on the question, “Who is the Attorney General’s client?”, the Article presumes that in the most important sense the American people are the Attorney General’s client. The Article argues, however, that that client relationship is necessarily a mediated one, with the most important mediat- ing force being the elected head of the executive branch, the President. The argument invokes historical considerations, epistemic concerns, and constitutional structure. Against a trend in recent commentary defending a robustly independent model of execu- tive branch lawyering rooted in the putative ability and obligation of executive branch lawyers to alight upon a “best view” of the law thought to have binding force even over plausible alternatives, the Article defends as legitimate and necessary a greater degree of presidential direction in the setting of legal policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The JFK Assassination and the Politics and Culture of Conspiracy Theory
    A Paranoid Style? : The JFK Assassination and the Politics and Culture of Conspiracy Theory Joseph Broadbent Degree of Masters of Arts by Research University of East Anglia School of American Studies January 2014 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 2 Abstract This thesis analyses the phenomenon of conspiracy theory, using the assassination of President John F. Kennedy as a case study. Doubt is the root cause of conspiracy theory, stemming from both the innate biases all humans exhibit, and a traumatic experience – in this case the assassination of JFK. This thesis argues that conspiracy theories are created and take hold because of a predisposition toward conspiracy theory, a misinterpretation of a central piece of evidence, such as the Zapruder film, and agency panic, where dispossession causes one to feel as if their agency is under threat. Conspiracy theory can provide believers with many emotions which appear to the individual to not be available elsewhere, namely closure, comfort, control, and a sense of leisure. Using the assassination of JFK, this thesis examines the role of conspiracy theory in modern American society. It weighs up the benefits of conspiracy theory, such as it is an example of free speech and it can aid transparency, with the negatives: that it can possibly cause harm to its adherents and their dependants because of a belief in ends justifying the means.
    [Show full text]