DOCSLIB.ORG

Wahleachcreek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

590 95 600 05 610 15 1200 1400 900 600 500 600 400 600 200 RUBY 700 0 1300 200 700 700 500 M 1 CREEK CM,CO 0 Falls 8 1200 e a 1100 4 LUKSEETSISSUM 200 L a k C r e k CC,CO,CT, 7 t e SASQUATCH 300 5 h u 1800 200 DV,MW,PCC, o Falls Ruby Creek 100 Fish Passage Assessment Planning r o RB,SK,ST,SU 100 PARK T T o 1700Hope Mountain 1600 r Dam - o E c h o d 200 1300 CM,PK 1500 u Unknown Moss Lake 1400 t Cascade 50377 C 200 100 FWCP - Wahleach I s l a n d L OriginDam 1300 a r 700 k 50376 CT,KO,RB e 1200 e BB,CT,EB, RB 8125 01 0 e CM,PK ho 1500 k e r 1100 KO,LW,RB, BEAVER DAM RB l v p e i 1000 C 1400 1300 AS,CAS,CT,RB SB,TR,WCT RB Falls S re 6086 01 0 900 CM,CO,CT, e 1300 k Cascade Hicks, Mount PK,SK 50379 CO 800 CO CO 700 Culvert CM,PK,SK 600 Priority PSCIS sites Modelled culverts Cascade 900 CO,CT,PK,RB 50380 Trans-Canada Hwy 500 1500 H i c k s Lake 700 (length of potential fish CM,SK CM,PK,SK 1500 400 Dam OHAMIL 1000 h 300 H: High M: Moderate habitat upstream (m)) RB 1400 RB g Lougheed Hwy u 100 1500 L: Low N: No fix !( RB o WAHLEACH 60 0-1,000m RB l ISLAND 86 BEAVER DAM 05 3 S 400 1. s (! n 500 Other PSCIS sites, barrier status 1,000-2,500 s o 600 n 700 h CO,CRS, 800 (! o CAL,CAS, 400 Barrier 81 800 2,500-5,000 J CC,CO,CRS, CT,PK, 900 11 RB,TR CM,CO,PK 01 R CT,PK,RB 0 0 0 19 H a r r i s o n Lake 51672 06 02 42 CO,CRS, 6 6 5 700 51533 8 08 S CO,CRS,RB 0 6 R L 600 CM,CO,CP,CT CRS 600 - CT,RB,TR 6 1 1 !( 800 0 0 Potential 500 05 9 CO 5,000-10,000 6086 4 400 2 Falls 5 AS,CM,CO, 300 CM 6300241 S L-2 Celia Cove 0 CT,DV,KO, 51682 R PK,RB,ST Passable 1 (! 1000 Log jam >10,000 CM,CO,PK 9 Crowhurst Bay 4 2 5 600 400 CT,ST 6300229 S k L CM,CO,PK -7 800 Unknown 200 51683 e 0 Probable open 6 64 0 0 64 100 e 8 1 6304009 6 T 6300228 6301687 Devoy, Mount 6 1600 r 6302361 0 2 bottom structure 2 1 C h CO 1 6 Bear Lake 200 CO BEAVER DAM 6300232 U 0 4 8 . 1500 1000 S H 0 District CAL,CH,CSU, u CAL,CH,CSU, 3 a Cascade CM,CO,CT,KO, Laidlaw 6 a 1 LDC, 0 k 51684 8149 10 0 0 0 LDC,LNC,LSU,MW, CC,CM, Silver Lake n PK,RB,SK,ST 2 3 s 1100 q 2 RB LNC CAL,CH,CSU, 7 e NSC,PCC,RSC,SK CO,CT, 0 0 Dam 0 u d r Modelled Potential Fish Habitat 7 of Kent LDC,LNC,SK 2 100 CC,CH,LDC,LNC PK,RB,ST L 5 PCC,RSC R u a e CH,LDC,NSC, CC,CH,CSU,LDC, 6300057 o E 1200 PCC,CAL, t r 200 LNC,LSU,NSC,RSC r b CH, c CO,NSC,RB,RSC RSC e CM Dam 1300 CM,LNC,LSU,SK n 1300 h i 51529 300 1500 Observed fish habitat 51530 RB 1200 r 51674 z CH,CM,CO, 1100 d C e PK,SK,ST 6300230 1000 r k y t C 0 e e w t ACT,AS,CH,CM,CO,CT, Cascade 1700 0 e a 1800 Inferred fish habitat - no stream >5% for >100m 0 e r H DV,KO,LW,MW,PK,PLS, r 51528 2 200 e M k C C RB,SG,SK,ST,TSB a S e Maria Slough d r R B s BMC,ESC, 300 e TSB CM a Whippoorwill k k STC,TSB n e 6 Inferred fish habitat - no stream >13% for >100m a Silver Peak 31 c k 9 Point 1 i C R BNH,RSC - 300 RB s 1900 H n Dam ra Inferred fish habitat - no stream >20% for >100m CM PETERS RB RB,TSB Isolillock CO,RSC,SB T 100 BMC,CC,CO, CO,NSC, Peak CT,RB,RSC, TSB 1000 R 2000 RSC,TSB 900 1900 NSC,RSC 800 2 SB,SSU,ST 700 51673 0 Bear Mountain 600 3 NSC,RSC,TSB 1800 1800 Non fish habitat - stream > 20% for >100m 300 CC,CO,RSC 50381 500 0 BMC,CCG, 400 8 300 200 NSC,RSC J 8 CO,RSC,SB O . 1700 CC,CO,RSC,SB BEAVER DAM CM 8 CH,CSU,LDC, 1600 1 (or other barrier present) 1 300 2 400 WSG 1300 0 CM,CO NSC,PCC,RSC 0 6 CC,CO,CT, CO 0 08 400 6 0 RSC,SB 500 NSC,RSC 0 k 1100 500 51527 1200 800 4 e 0 e BMC,CO,RSC,SB Average stream gradient 6 r 200 1400 300 8 600 C 0 700 0 600 6 0 WSG CAL,CCT,CH,CM,CSU, 400 y 1 1500 R LDC,LNC,NSC,PCC, 2 b 2 1 WSG 500 0 1800 r TSB RSC,SDC,SK O 0 - 5% - riffle and cascade pool WSG CC,CH,LDC, 0 3 J 0 e WSG 0 8 MSU,NSC,RSC 8 w Corporation of the CH,CM,LDC, 0 WSG 0 o 800 CM 2 J 3 0 S NSC,RSC,SSU O CAL,CC,CH, LNC,SK 1 0 1 L 2 0 1 J R 2 CSU,LDC,LNC, CC,CH,CM,CSU, 2 1 RB 1 1 Village of Harrison 2 R 8 1 6 - 13% - step pool NSC,PCC,TSB LDC,LNC,NSC, 6 1 51675 6 0 9 CH,LDC,LNC, PCC,RSC,SK,TR 9 6 1500 Lougheed Hwy 51526 1 6 TSB CAL,CC,CH,CSU,LDC, R 6 1600 800 Hot Springs LSU,NSC,PCC 1200 CC,LNC, LNC,NSC,PCC,RSC,SK H 500 U 700 CO,NSC,RSC, PCC,RSC 1 14 - 20% - step pool, very steep PK 8 54 CBC,CC, 1000 54 SSU,TSB 100 0 Stoneman, 60 0 60 CH,CSU,LDC, 1100 SM5A 0 ESC,SU,TSB LDC 0 R02023 CCT,CH,CO, LNC,NSC,PCC, Cheam View Mount CCT,CH,CO, CAS,CO,TSB CSU,NSC,RSC, CM RSC TSBCSU,NSC,RSC, 51676 RB 500 SSU SSU CC,CH,LDC, CH,LDC,LNC, > 20% - non fish habitat CAS,PMB,TSB CH,CM,CO,TR BMC,CAL,CCT,CH, 51678 LNC,SK NSC,PCC,RSC 6301655 CH,CSU, 1200 700 400 50382CO,CSU,PMB,RB, Culvert 600 RB 0 BMC,CO,SB RSC,SSU,TSB CAL,CH, LDC,LNC,SK 51525 k 0 300 TSB CSU,LDC,LNC H 0 e 0 CO,RSC,TSB CH,NSC,RSC,SK BMC,CAS,CCT, 51524 e 800 6 200 CH,LDC 51523 u r D CH,CO,CSU, CC,CH,LDC, 6301656 RB 1600 600 n C Model inputs and other point features W NSC,RSC,SSU LNC,PCC,RSC RB RB t 4 CCT,CO, h CC,CH,CSU, R RB e n 5 RB,TSB 3 400 SSU,TSB LDC,LNC, 1 r e 0 g 9 RB,TSB 2 3 C NSC,RSC,SK 1 # R u m 3 RB,TSB re i Known fish observation (FISS) 8 o J 1 W BEAVER DAM 0 4 e a l 9 2 6 0 0 k S 1 M 0 51679 R 0 W 0 CH,CM,CO, CM B 0 CO 50374 s BMC,CC,CT, 0 )" 3 1600 CT,PK,SK,ST 1 RB 1700 Dam, weir or falls >5m (FISS, FWA) SA,SU,TSB PK 193 a RB M2 g R S CO,RSC,SB 3 300 h n 2 i R 0 BMC,CO,SB 600 r CAS,NSC, 1 l 2 CH,CSU, 9 e 0 p 0 6 R G RSC,TSB LDC,NSC, 6 a Other potential barriers s 5 2 PCC,RSC,SK J t J c R CM,CO R 6302543 W o B 0 1 CO,NSC,RB, 3 h 2 1 1 6303646 0 3 5 51522 R 300 RSC,TSB H R 2 9 0 1 A 1 1 3 Ludwig, Mount 9 9 R 0 S Stream sample site (FISS) Culvert 3 6 1 C 6 3 2 M 200 CM,CO 51680 J Barr, Mount 4 r J 1300 1200 W 1800 Hot Rd SpringsHot L 1 e 0 0 CAS,NSC,TSB 1100 1 1 CSU,NSC,TSB 0 3 100 CC,CH,CSU, 0 e 1900 2 1700 300 @ 0 0 M SEABIRD LDC,LNC,MW k 1800 ? Hydrometric station 6301838 0 300 1600 ISLAND 600 CH,CSU,LDC, 6302544 1 i 8 M all u a Culvert LNC,RSC 1 S C 4 3 c m m 9 51532 WSG 2 M D 51677 0 0 3 2 0 i i 0 S t 1400 R 3 CC,CP,CT,RB, 1200 6303150 Roads etc c CH,CSU,NSC, 2M CO,PMB,TSB 51643 C 51520 0 STC,SU,TSB 2 3 h PCC,RSC 0 r 6300415 R 51519 0 51644 50373 e e CC,LNC 51542 6302066 51518 51517 DRA: highway, arterial k CC,CSU,LDC, H 51521 51531 50375 WSG NSC,PCC,RSC 51541 6302063 CC,LNC,TSB WAHLEACH R 17 DAM 04 DRA: collector CAS,CSU, 51540 6 Dam 51516 B R 300 100 NSC,PMB 300 J 51539 CRA,CT,RB,TSB H 3 51538 0 200 Cheam View 8149 0 CT,RB,TSB 6300407 4 0 51537 700 CO 1200 DRA: local 56 Hydro Dam Dam 6303170 6302048 56 TSB CO,CT,RB 51536 51511 6303174 1300 51535 RB TSB 51681 SG 7 51510 CO,TSB 9 SP Culvert CH,CM,CO,SK 9 RB 6303163 6303906 DRA/TRIM: other 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Cheam Range, Lady Peak, North Face

    Cheam Range, Lady Peak, North Face

    AAC Publications Cheam Range, Lady Peak, North Face Canada, British Columbia, North Cascades On May 7, Brette Harrington and Marc-André Leclerc climbed the north face of Lady Peak (2,178m) in the Cheam Range, near Chilliwack. This was likely the first ascent of the face, whose steepest section gains about 500m and is comprised of loose but compact volcanic rock. The two spent 13 hours on the climb, which involved thin ice and technical dry tooling on slabs, often with marginal protection (11 long pitces, 5.8 M4 80°). They topped out at sundown and scrambled to the summit before descending easy slopes to the west. In January 2016, the same pair made the probable first ski descent of the northeast couloir on Lady Peak. – Dougald MacDonald, with information from Marc-André Leclerc The following first-person account of this ascent, by Marc-André Leclerc, unfortunately was received too late for publication in the print edition of AAJ 2018: On May 7, Brette Harrington and I climbed a line, right of center, on the imposing north face of Lady Peak in the Cheam Range, the same range of mountains where I essentially began my true mountaineering apprenticeship, with an ascent of Welch Peak, at 11 years old. The area is well known for very loose rock, and the more technical routes are often done in winter or spring as frozen mixed routes. The north face of Lady Peak is the steepest in the range and could be considered the last major face in the range to be climbed, as the unclimbed north face of the Still, while appealing, is quite small in comparison.
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.
  • Lawyers in the History of British Columbia Mountaineering

    Lawyers in the History of British Columbia Mountaineering

    LET THE SKY FALL: LAWYERS IN THE HISTORY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA MOUNTAINEERING PART II – THE MOUNTAINEERS By David Crerar, Anders Ourom and Harry Crerar* Part I of this article “The Mountains” appeared in (2017) 75 Advocate 75. It detailed the topography of British Columbia that owes so much to the legal his- tory of this province. art II of this article focuses on the mountaineers: judges and lawyers who have at least given mountaineering, climbing, scrambling or backcountry skiing a try. We will avoid the ques- tion as to “what is a mountaineer?” To paraphrase a famous Premark by a judge with regard to obscenity, we know one when we see one. Of course, many may dabble, but few (so to speak) are called to a lifetime avocation in the mountains. JURIST MOUNTAINEERS Sir Matthew Baillie Begbie The assizes and circuits of Chief Justice Sir Matthew Baillie Begbie (1819 Mauritius–1894 Victoria) put him among the greatest adventurers in British Columbia history. His first assize, in March 1859, took him from New West- minster to the gold fields of Yale and beyond, up the Fraser Canyon. Trav- elling on foot, Begbie’s four-man party went from Yale to Spuzzum, crossed the Fraser at Chapman’s Bar to the east bank, and followed the Hudson’s * The authors wish to thank the following for their assistance with this article: Daien Ide and Janet Turner (North Vancouver Museum and Archives), Bernice Chong and Jacquie Reagh (the Law Society of British Columbia Archives), Carla Jack (Provincial Toponymist, B.C. Geographical Names Office), David Roberts, Q.C., Dr.
  • Varsity Outdoor Club Journal

    Varsity Outdoor Club Journal

    Varsity Outdoor Club Journal / / r VOLUME XXXIII 1990 The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada AN INTERVIEW WITH C.S. BUNGI The Varsity Outdoor Club Journal (VOCJ) interviews CS. Bungi, the legendary and mysterious founding member of the VOC. VOCJ: Do you remember Longhike? C.S.: Longhike? VOCJ: Remember? It was back before 24921 papers, 2379 exams, 87,721.36 classes (never could get to that Monday morning class on time), 109 trips (63 of which were bushwhacks), and 8327.6 cinnamon buns (dropped a few) and 75 baseball games (Eric). CS.: Oh that Longhike! Who could forget: over 100 people, the Rockschool invasion of Smoke Bluffs (spearheaded by Andy), guitars, exploding stereo, tossing green linguini, awesome pancakes (food by Fern, thanks), meeting new friends in the hot tubl!! and getting involved with the VDS. VOCJ: Did you get to Leavenworth? CS.: Yeah, you folks are crazy! One party, led by Mr. Headlamp and All Night Eric, climbed ‘til 3:00 AM and missed a Thanksgiving BBQ dinner for 30 (sounds like a Pacheco trip). There were too many cobs of corn, too many yams, too much salad and too many beer for dinner, but (sorry Eric, Celeste, Duhane and Craig) we ate it all! Can’t forget climbing over our heads, swimming in Icicle Creek, tent hopping (Ken), the SWRCC and a couple of close shaves with Don. Good time that. VOCJ: And Glacier School? CS.: I could hardly find it! Two days in waist deep snow and we never even saw a glacier. The instructors pitched in and helped carry Chrystal’s wardrobe and then racing around trying to set up camp before the storm hit.
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia 1976

    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.