Final Report Biodiversity Investigation and Habitat Hectare Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria

Prepared for Regional Roads Victoria February 2020

Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd

MELBOURNE: 292 Mt Alexander Road, Ascot Vale VIC 3032 GEELONG: 230 Latrobe Terrace, Geelong West Vic 3218 BRISBANE: Level 22, 127 Creek Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 ADELAIDE: 22 Greenhill Road, Wayville SA 5034 CANBERRA: PO Box 6067, O’Connor ACT 2602 SYDNEY: Level 5, 616 Harris Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007 www.ehpartners.com.au | (03) 9377 0100

DOCUMENT CONTROL

Assessment Biodiversity Investigation and Habitat Hectare Assessment Address Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria Project number 11416 Project manager Shannon LeBel (Senior Ecologist) Report reviewer Shannon LeBel (Senior Ecologist) Jeremy Coyne (Zoologist), Kyra Evanochko (Botanist), Cat Stephenson (Senior Bushfire Consultant/ Other EHP staff Botanist) Mapping Petra Sorenson (GIS Officer) File name 11416_EHP_BA_Wallan_VicRoads_Finalv4_12022020 Client Regional Roads Victoria Bioregion Central Victorian Uplands and Victorian Volcanic Plain CMA Port Phillip and Westernport Council Mitchell Shire Council Comments updated Report versions Comments Date submitted by Draft 1 Report sent to VicRoads for review 19/12/2018 No comments from Client. Incorporation of Final summary results and implications relating to the SLB 20/03/2019 targeted fauna surveys Amended Responsible Authority under the Final v2 SLB 29/04/2019 Water Act 1989 Additional information regarding Golden Sun Moth, Growling Grass Frog, habitat along Final v3 Northern Highway and partial coverage of the CS 10/12/2019 study area by the Strategic Assessment Final v4 Amending an in-text table reference CS 12/02/2020

Acknowledgements We thank the following people for their contribution to the project: • Bruno Spandonide (VicRoads) for project and site information; • The Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning for access to ecological databases; • The Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy for access to ecological databases.

Copyright © Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd This document is subject to copyright and may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned. The use or copying of this document in whole or part without the permission of Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd is an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer Although Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd have taken all the necessary steps to ensure that an accurate document has been prepared, the company accepts no liability for any damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report and its contents.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd was commissioned by VicRoads to conduct a Biodiversity Investigation and Habitat Hectare Assessment for the Wallan Area Network Improvement Project. This assessment was undertaken to identify and characterise the vegetation on-site, determine the presence (or likelihood thereof) of any significant flora and fauna species and/or ecological communities and address any implications under Commonwealth and State environmental legislation.

Methods

A series of field assessments were undertaken on 19th, 25th and 31st October 2018 to obtain information on terrestrial flora and fauna values within the study area. Where native vegetation was identified, a habitat hectare assessment was undertaken in conjunction with the flora survey. Vegetation within the study area was assessed according to the habitat hectare methodology, which is described in the Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual. Additional field assessments were undertaken on 28th, 29th and 30th October 2019 to assess potential habitat for Growling Grass Frog and Golden Sun Moth within and adjoining the study area. Assessments were also undertaken to identify habitat values (i.e. hollows, nests, spouts) within the trees along Northern Highway.

Results

Flora

One hundred and fourteen (114) flora species (30 indigenous and 84 non-indigenous or introduced) were recorded within the study area during the field assessment. Most of the indigenous species observed in the study area were planted as street or roadside trees, revegetation associated with the overpass construction over the Hume Freeway or ornamental plantings in Wallan Community Park. The trees within the road reserve along the Northern Freeway were confirmed to be old roadside plantings of Southern Mahogany Eucalyptus botryoides, Sugar Gum Eucalyptus cladocalyx and Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata.

Based on habitat present within the study area, landscape context and the proximity of previous records, significant flora species are considered unlikely to occur within the study area.

Fauna

Fourteen (14) fauna species were recorded within the study area during the field assessment, which consisted of nine native and three introduced bird species, and two native frog species. No significant fauna species were recorded during the field assessment. Targeted surveys were undertaken for the nationally significant Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis and Golden Sun Moth Synemon plana. Despite the surveys being undertaken in suitable conditions, and the species being observed elsewhere on the days that the surveys were undertaken, neither Growling Grass Frog or Golden Sun Moth were recorded within or adjacent to the study area.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 3

Although other national and/or significant fauna may occasionally visit the study area (i.e. birds) en-route to higher-quality habitat within the locality, both national and State significant fauna species are considered unlikely to occur to rely on habitat within the study area for foraging or breeding habitat. Potential fauna habitat within the trees along the Northern Highway was limited, with six individual trees containing hollows and/or spouts (i.e. openings at the end of broken branches). The hollows observed were all approximately 10 centimetres or less, thereby providing a limited scope of which animals could occupy these spaces.

Communities

Vegetation within the study area did not meet the condition thresholds that define any significant ecological communities.

Permitted Clearing Assessment (the Guidelines)

Native vegetation within the study area is representative of one EVC, being Swampy Riparian Woodland (Stage 2 only). Although the majority of this patch is located outside of the Stage 2 study area, a small section overlaps the potential construction footprint.

Although the Swampy Riparian Woodland vegetation has been planted, as it is considered that as the works were conducted for the purposes of enhancing biodiversity values, the removal of this vegetation is not exempt from the requirements of Clause 52.17.

Assuming all native vegetation within the proposed study area will be impacted, the study area is within Location 1, with 0.120 hectares of native vegetation proposed to be removed. As such, the permit application falls under the Basic Assessment pathway.

The offset requirement for native vegetation removal is 0.033 General Habitat Units (HUs). No Species HUs are generated by the existing proposal. Ecology and Heritage Partners can confirm that the likely offset obligations generated by this proposal can be satisfied through existing credits registered in our OTC database without any difficulty.

Melbourne Strategic Assessment and Biodiversity Conservation Strategy

The southern 600 metres of the study area along the Northern Highway is within the Melbourne Strategic Assessment and Biodiversity Conservation Strategy. The area subject to habitat compensation obligations for Golden Sun Moth and Growling Grass Frog are 1.997 hectares and 2.115 hectares respectively. The total compensation fee for works being undertaken in this area will be $34,900.90 (GST inclusive).

Legislative and Policy Implications

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act - Commonwealth)

In accordance with the Commonwealth approval conditions of the BCS made on 5 September 2013, provided the relevant habitat compensation obligations relating to the study area are met (Appendix 4.2 for habitat compensation obligations), there are no further assessments required to comply with the existing approval. Despite targeted surveys on four separate occasions in areas of potential habitat (Northern Highway road reserve), Golden Sun Moth was not detected within the study area. The species was detected at several known

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 4

sites within Greater Melbourne on the same day as the surveys were conducted, indicating that conditions were suitable for surveying and identifying the species. As such, Golden Sun Moth is considered highly unlikely to occur within the study area. Furthermore, the paddocks north of Stage 1 to the west of the Hume Freeway are not considered to contain suitable habitat for Golden Sun Moth. The Golden Sun Moth typically occurs in native grassland and grassy woodland dominated by wallaby-grass Rytidosperma spp., Spear Grass Austrostipa spp. and Kangaroo Grass Themeda triandra, as well as in degraded grasslands dominated by the exotic Chilean Needle-grass (Nassella nessiana), which is a noxious weed. These grass species are intrinsically linked to the presence of Golden Sun Moth and integral to the viability of a population of the species. The paddocks north of Stage 1 are not considered to contain suitable habitat due to none of these grass species being observed during the field assessment, and no additional surveys are required.

No Growling Grass Frogs were detected during the targeted surveys conducted in 2018 and 2019 despite weather conditions being suitable. Based on targeted survey results, landscape context and the proximity of previous records, there is a low likelihood that the wetlands within the study area currently support a breeding population of Growling Grass Frogs or forms part of a dispersal corridor for the species. Based on the results of the targeted surveys, and absence of other matters of NES within the study area, a referral under the EBPC Act is not required.

Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act - Victoria)

There is potential habitat within the study area for several species listed or protected under the FFG Act. Several Wattles that are ‘protected’ under the FFG Act are present, with the majority of these having been planted. Planted protected or listed vegetation is not considered ‘wild’ under the FFG Act, and as such, a permit is not required to remove this vegetation. If any remnant protected flora species are proposed to be impacted on public land in Stages 1, 2 or 3, a permit under the FFG Act will be required. VicRoads should allow up to six weeks to obtain an FFG Act permit through DELWP.

Environment Effects Act 1978 (Victoria)

Based on the current development plan, vegetation proposed for removal does not meet any thresholds that triggers a referral under the Environment Effects Act 1978 (EE Act). The EE Act does list the loss of critical habitat of a species under the FFG Act as being a trigger, however neither species was recorded during the targeted surveys, and the potential habitat for each species is not considered to be ‘critical’ habitat. As such, it is considered that a referral is not required based on biodiversity considerations.

Planning and Environment Act 1987

A Planning Permit from Mitchell Shire Council is required to remove, destroy or lop any native vegetation (except where the ‘Planted Vegetation’ exemption applies). A permit under the VPO2 will be required to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation within the Hume Highway corridor.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 5

Other Legislation and Policy

Implications relating to other local and State policy (Wildlife Act 1975, Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994, local government authorities) as well as additional studies or reporting that may be required (targeted surveys, Conservation Management Plan, Weed Management Plan, Construction Environment Managements Plan) are provided in Section 5.

Table S1. Application requirements for a permit to remove native vegetation (Victoria Planning Provisions Clause 52.17 -3; DELWP 2017)

No. Application Requirement Response Basic Assessment Pathway Information about the native vegetation being removed, including: • The assessment pathway and reason for the assessment pathway;

• A description of the native vegetation to be removed; See Figure 2, Section 3.4 and Appendix 4 1 (NVR Report) • Maps showing the native vegetation and property in context; • The offset requirement that will apply if the native vegetation is approved to be removed.

Topographic and land information relating to the native vegetation to be removed, showing ridges, crests and hilltops, wetlands and waterways, 2 Details provided in Section 1.3 slopes of more than 20 per cent, drainage lines, low lying areas, saline discharge areas, and areas of existing erosion, as appropriate. 3 Recent dated photographs of the native vegetation to be removed. Refer to Section 3. Details of any other native vegetation approved to be removed, or that was removed without the required approvals, on the same property or on 4 Not Applicable contiguous land in the same ownership as the applicant, in the five year period before the application for a permit is lodged. An avoid and minimise statement. The statement describes any efforts to avoid the removal of, and minimise the impacts on biodiversity and other 5 Details provided in Section 5.1 vales of native vegetation, and how these efforts focussed on areas of native vegetation that have the most value. A copy of any Property Vegetation Plan contained within an agreement made 6 pursuant to Section 69 of the Conservation, Forests and Lands Act 1987 that Not Applicable applies to the native vegetation to be removed. Where the removal of native vegetation is to create defendable space, a written statement explaining why the removal of native vegetation is necessary. This statement must have regard to other available bushfire risk 7 Not applicable. mitigation measures. This statement is not required when the creation of defendable space is in conjunction with an application under the Bushfire Management Overlay. If the application is under Clause 52.16, a statement that explains how the 8 proposal responds to the Native Vegetation Precinct Plan considerations at Not applicable. decision guideline 8. An offset statement providing evidence that an offset that meets the offset 9 requirements for the native vegetation to be removed has been identified, Section 7.1.1. and can be secured in accordance with the Guidelines.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 6

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 9 Background ...... 9 Purpose of the Assessment ...... 9 Study Area ...... 11 2 METHODS ...... 12 Desktop Assessment ...... 12 Field Assessments ...... 13 Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (Guidelines) ...... 13 Melbourne Strategic Assessment and Biodiversity Conservation Strategy ...... 15 Assessment Qualifications and Limitations ...... 15 Consultation ...... 16 3 RESULTS ...... 17 Stage 1 - Watson Street Interchange Upgrade ...... 17 Stage 2 - Watson Street duplication between the Northern Highway and the Hume Freeway interchange ...... 19 Stage 3 - Northern Highway duplication between Watson Street and the Hume Freeway interchange South of Wallan...... 21 Removal of Native Vegetation (the Guidelines) ...... 23 Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Habitat Compensation Obligations ...... 24 Significance Assessment ...... 24 4 DISCUSSION ...... 28 5 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS ...... 29 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) ...... 29 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (Victoria) ...... 30 Environment Effects Act 1978 (Victoria) ...... 30 Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Victoria) ...... 31 Wildlife Act 1975 and Wildlife Regulations 2013 (Victoria) ...... 33 Water Act 1989 (Victoria) ...... 33 Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 (Victoria) ...... 33 6 HABITAT HECTARE ASSESSMENT ...... 34 7 MITIGATION MEASURES ...... 35 Mitigation Measures ...... 35 Best Practice Mitigation Measures ...... 35

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 7

8 CONCLUSION ...... 40 9 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 41 10 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ...... 43 REFERENCES...... 44 FIGURES ...... 47 APPENDICES ...... 62 APPENDIX 1. ASSIGNMENT BRIEF ...... 63 APPENDIX 2 - FLORA ...... 78 Appendix 2.1 – Flora Results ...... 78 Appendix 2.2 – Significant Flora Species ...... 82 APPENDIX 3 - FAUNA ...... 85 Appendix 3.1 – Significant Fauna Species ...... 85 APPENDIX 4. OFFSET ESTIMATION ...... 88 Appendix 4.1 – Native Vegetation Removal (NVR) Report...... 88 Appendix 4.2 – Habitat Compensation Obligations for the study area within the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy ...... 96

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 8

1 INTRODUCTION

Background

Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd was commissioned by Regional Roads Victoria to conduct a Biodiversity Investigation and Habitat Hectare Assessment within the three stages of the Wallan Area Network Improvements Project (the ‘Project’), located in Wallan, Victoria

Access to the Hume Freeway is south of the Wallan township via the Northern Highway interchange and is the only existing southern entry and exit point. The Northern Highway exceeds capacity during peak periods and results in traffic queues that back onto the slow lanes of the Hume Freeway, increasing the potential for rear end crashes. The existing Hume Freeway/Watson Street interchange east of the Wallan Township was constructed in the mid 1970’s and comprises northerly orientated ramps and a freeway overpass. Planning for the Hume Freeway included the future provision of southerly orientated ramps at the Watson Street interchange and land was acquired and reserved for the construction of these ramps. To cater for predicted growth in the Wallan township, an additional southern access to the Hume Freeway is proposed that would provide additional ramps to the south and a new freeway overpass at a Watson Street interchange. Watson Street would be duplicated, and associated intersections upgraded between the new interchange and the Northern Highway intersection.

In combination with these changes, the Northern Highway would be duplicated to the south of Watson Street as outlined in Plate 1. It would service a large area of future residential development south of the Wallan township.

Purpose of the Assessment

The purpose of this assessment is to investigate the flora and fauna values within the Wallan Area Network Improvements Project and provide a detailed report including habitat hectare and habitat importance score assessments. Further, the assessment identified the extent and type of remnant native vegetation present within the study area and to determine the presence of significant flora and fauna species and/or ecological communities, and comprised the following components: • Review of relevant flora and fauna databases and available literature;

• A series of field assessments to identify flora and fauna values within the study area; • Provision of maps showing any areas of remnant native vegetation and locations of any significant flora and fauna species, and/or fauna habitat (if present);

• Classification of any flora and fauna species and vegetation communities identified or considered likely to occur within the study area in accordance with Commonwealth and State legislation; • Documentation of relevant environmental legislation and policy;

• Documentation of any opportunities and constraints associated with the proposed works; and,

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 9

• Advice regarding the requirement for any additional flora and/or fauna surveys are required prior to works commencing (e.g. targeted surveys for significant flora and fauna species).

Where areas of remnant vegetation were present, the following tasks were completed to address requirements under the ‘Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation’ (Guidelines) (DELWP 2017a):

• A habitat hectare assessment of any areas of remnant native vegetation within the study area; • Recommendations to address requirements under the Guidelines to minimise impacts to remnant vegetation; and,

• Provision of offset targets for any native vegetation, scattered trees and habitat for rare or threatened species proposed to be lost as a result of the proposed works.

Plate 1. Proposed road network improvements in Wallan (Supplied by VicRoads).

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 10

Study Area

The study area is located in Wallan, Victoria, approximately 45 kilometres north of Melbourne’s CBD (Figure 1). The study area generally includes the 50 metre area each side of the road reserves along Hume Freeway, Northern Highway and Watson Street (Figure 2). The Project has been broken down into three stages (as shown in Plate 1 and Figure 2): • Stage 1 - Watson Street Interchange Upgrade (including new freeway overpass structure and southern ramps). This stage also includes the potential drainage realignment north of the existing alignment outside the study area on private property; • Stage 2 - Watson Street duplication between the Northern Highway and the Hume Freeway interchange.; and, • Stage 3 - Northern Highway duplication between Watson Street and the Hume Freeway interchange South of Wallan.

The road reserves in all stages are generally flat; however, there are some drainage lines that pass under the existing roads, particularly Watson Street. The road reserves along the Hume Freeway, Watson Street and the northern third of the Northern Highway are regularly slashed and maintained, while the remainder of the Northern Highway appears largely unmanaged and was comprised of extensive areas of long grass as the time of the field assessments. According to the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) Tool (DELWP 2019a), the study area occurs within the Central Victorian Uplands and Victorian Volcanic Plain bioregions (approximately half the study area is covered by each bioregion). It is located within the jurisdiction of the Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority (CMA) and the Mitchell Shire Council municipality.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 11

2 METHODS

Desktop Assessment

Relevant literature, online-resources and databases were reviewed to provide an assessment of flora and fauna values associated with the study area. The following information sources were reviewed: • The DELWP NVIM Tool (DELWP 2019a) and NatureKit (DELWP 2019b) for: o Modelled data for location risk, remnant vegetation patches, scattered trees and habitat for rare or threatened species; and, o The extent of historic and current EVCs.

• EVC benchmarks (DELWP 2019c) for descriptions of EVCs within the relevant bioregion; • The Victorian Biodiversity Atlas (VBA) for previously documented flora and fauna records within the project locality (DELWP 2019d);

• The Illustrated Flora Information System of Victoria (IFLISV) (Gullan 2017) for assistance with the distribution and identification of flora species; • The Commonwealth Department of the Environment (DoEE) Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) for matters of National Environmental Significance (NES) protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (DoEE 2018); • Relevant listings under the Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act), including the latest Threatened and Protected Lists (DELWP 2019e; DELWP 2017c); • The Planning Maps Online (DELWP 2019f) and Planning Schemes Online (DELWP 2019g) to ascertain current zoning and environmental overlays in the study area;

• Other relevant environmental legislation and policies as required; • Aerial photography of the study area; and, • Previous ecological or other relevant assessments of the study area, including: o Brett Lane & Associates (BL&A) 2010. Northern Highway Duplication, Wallan to Kilmore: Flora and Fauna Assessment. o Biosis 2006. Flora and Fauna Assessment of the Northern Highway – Wallan to Kilmore, Victoria. o Ecology and Heritage Partners 2014. Environment Effects Statement (Flora and Fauna): Kilmore to Wallan Bypass.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 12

Field Assessments

2.2.1 Vegetation Assessment A vegetation assessment was undertaken on 19th, 25th and 31st October 2018 to obtain information on flora values within the study area. The study area was walked, with all observed vascular flora species recorded, any significant records mapped and the overall condition of vegetation noted. Remnant vegetation in the local area was also investigated to assist in determining the pre-European vegetation within the study area. EVCs were determined with reference to DELWP pre-1750 and extant EVC mapping (DELWP 2019a) and their published descriptions (DELWP 2019c). Where remnant vegetation was identified a habitat hectare assessment was undertaken following methodology described in the Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual (DSE 2004).

2.2.2 Fauna Assessment A fauna assessment was undertaken on 31 October 2018 to obtain information on terrestrial fauna values within the study area. The study area was visually assessed and active searching under and around ground debris for reptiles, frogs and small mammals was undertaken. Binoculars were also used to scan the area for birds, and observers listened for calls and searched for other signs of fauna such as nests, remains of dead animals, droppings and footprints. Potential habitat for fauna was assessed, with a particular emphasis on habitats that may provide shelter, food or other resources for significant species.

Additional field assessments were undertaken on 28th, 29th and 30th October 2019 to assess potential habitat for Growling Grass Frog and Golden Sun Moth within and adjoining the study area. Assessments were also undertaken to identify habitat values (i.e. hollows, nests, spouts) within the trees along Northern Highway.

The methodology and results of the 2019 Growling Grass Frog and Golden Sun Moth targeted surveys are provided in a sperate report (Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019).

Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (Guidelines)

Under the Planning and Environment Act 1987, Clause 52.17 of the Planning Schemes requires a planning permit from the relevant local Council to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation. The assessment process for the clearing of vegetation follows the ‘Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation’ (Guidelines) (DELWP 2017a). The ‘Assessor’s handbook – applications to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation’ (Assessor’s handbook) (DELWP 2017b) provides clarification regarding the application of the Guidelines.

2.3.1 Assessment Pathway The Guidelines manage the impacts on biodiversity from native vegetation removal (DELWP 2017a). The assessment pathway for an application to remove native vegetation reflects its potential impact on biodiversity and is determined from the location and extent of the native vegetation to be removed. The location risk (1, 2 or 3) has been determined for all areas in Victoria and is available on DELWP’s Native Vegetation Information Management (NVIM) Tool (DELWP 2019a). Determination of assessment pathway is summarised in Table 1.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 13

Table 1. Assessment pathways for applications to remove native vegetation (DELWP 2017a)

Location Extent 1 2 3

< 0.5 hectares, and not including any large trees Basic Intermediate Detailed Native Less than 0.5 hectares, and including one or more large trees Intermediate Intermediate Detailed Vegetation 0.5 hectares or more Detailed Detailed Detailed Note: For the purpose of determining the risk-based pathway of an application to remove native vegetation the extent includes any other native vegetation that was permitted to be removed on the same contiguous parcel of land with the same ownership as the native vegetation to be removed, where the removal occurred in the five year period before an application to remove native vegetation is lodged.

2.3.2 Vegetation Assessment Native vegetation (as defined in Table 2) is assessed using two key parameters: extent (in hectares) and condition. For the purposes of this assessment, both condition and extent were determined as part of the habitat hectare1 assessment conducted by a qualified ecologist during the vegetation assessment.

Table 2. Determination of remnant native vegetation (DELWP 2017a)

Category Definition Extent Condition An area of vegetation where at least 25 per cent of the total perennial understorey cover is native. Measured in hectares. Vegetation Quality Remnant patch of OR Assessment Manual native vegetation Based on hectare area of An area with three or more native canopy the remnant patch. (DSE 2004). trees where the drip line of each tree touches the drip line of at least one other tree, forming a continuous canopy. Measured in hectares. A small tree is assigned an extent of 0.031 hectares Scattered trees are A native canopy tree that does not form part Scattered tree (10m radius). assigned a default of a remnant patch. A large tree is assigned an condition score of 0.2. extent of 0.071 hectares (15m radius). Notes: Native vegetation is defined in the Victoria Planning Provisions as ‘ that are indigenous to Victoria, including trees, , herbs and grasses’.

2.3.3 Offsets Offsets are required to compensate for the permitted removal of native vegetation. Offsets are divided into two categories: General and Species Habitat Units (HUs).

1 A ‘habitat hectare’ is a unit of measurement which combines the condition and extent of native vegetation.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 14

The offset requirements for native vegetation removal are calculated by DELWP, based on the vegetation condition scores determined during the biodiversity assessment. The Native Vegetation Removal (NVR) Report is presented in Appendix 4.1.

Melbourne Strategic Assessment and Biodiversity Conservation Strategy

The Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (BCS) (DEPI 2013a) and associated sub-regional species’ strategies (DEPI 2013b; 2013c; 2013d; DSE 2009a) identify conservation outcomes and offset consolidation strategies for Victoria’s native vegetation and matters of National Environmental Significance, including mechanisms for how these outcomes will be delivered. The BCS covers Melbourne’s four growth corridor within the expanded 2010 Urban Growth Boundary, as well as the previous 28 precincts, except where a planning scheme amendment to introduce a Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) has been approved prior to 1 March 2012. Classes of actions associated with urban development in the majority of the land in Melbourne’s growth corridors have been approved under section 146B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). An approval was made in relation to the western, north-western and northern growth corridors on 5 September 2013. An approval in relation to the south-eastern growth corridor was made on 11 September 2014. The Commonwealth approvals implement key elements of the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (BCS) (DEPI 2013a) for Melbourne’s Growth Corridors. The study area is partially located within the Wallan South & Wallan East (Part 1) PSP in Melbourne’s northern growth corridor.

The Commonwealth approvals are subject to conditions, which include habitat compensation obligations and the restriction of urban development in identified conservation areas. This data has been used to determine the habitat compensation obligations for the study area to which the BCS applies (Figure 2; Appendix 4.2).

Assessment Qualifications and Limitations

Data and information held within the ecological databases and mapping programs reviewed in the desktop assessment (e.g. VBA, PMST, NatureKit Maps etc.) are unlikely to represent all flora and fauna observations within, and surrounding, the study area. It is therefore important to acknowledge that a lack of documented records does not necessarily indicate that a species or community is absent. Ecological values identified on site are recorded using a hand-held GPS or tablet with an accuracy of +/-1 metre. This level of accuracy is considered adequate to provide an accurate assessment of the ecological values present within the study area; however, this data should not be used for detailed surveying purposes. The field assessment was undertaken during a suitable season for the identification of flora and fauna species (mid-Spring). However, the ‘snap shot’ nature of a standard biodiversity assessment meant that migratory, transitory or uncommon fauna species may have been absent from typically occupied habitats at the time of the field assessment. In addition, annual or cryptic flora species such as those that persist via underground tubers may also be absent.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 15

The terrestrial flora and fauna data collected during the field assessments and information obtained from relevant desktop sources is considered adequate to provide an accurate assessment of the ecological values present within the study area and on relevant adjoining property.

Consultation

It is understood that VicRoads has briefed the Mitchell Shire Council and is working with the Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning (DELWP) through the planning approval process. Consultation with the broader community was undertaken in June 2018, presenting concept plans for the interchange and Watson St duplication, and seeking local knowledge for the Northern Highway, in order to develop concept plans.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 16

3 RESULTS

Stage 1 - Watson Street Interchange Upgrade

3.1.1 Vegetation Condition Stage 1 largely contains exotic grasses and planted trees and shrubs, with some scattered native vegetation occasionally present.

3.1.1.1 Remnant Patches

No patches of native vegetation as defined by the Guidelines (DELWP 2017) were recorded within Stage 1.

3.1.1.2 Introduced and Planted Vegetation

Introduced Vegetation

Vegetation within the Stage 1 is either comprised of exotic vegetation or plated native or non-native vegetation.

The exotic vegetation within the Stage 1 mostly consists of common exotic pasture grass species and other weedy species such as Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne, Toowoomba Canary-grass Phalaris aquatica, White Clover Trifolium repens, Cape Weed Arctotheca calendula and Buck’s-horn Plantain Plantago coronopus (Plate 2). The drainage line along Stage 1’s eastern-most boundary (Figure 2a) contains a range of native and exotic vegetation, however there was not enough coverage of native species to constitute a patch given that the area was dominated by introduced species such as Common Peppercress Lepidium africanum, Water Plantain Alisma lanceolatum, Hop Clover Trifolium campestre var. campestre and Cleavers Galium aparine (Plate 3). Several noxious weeds are recorded in close proximity to the Hume Highway interchange including Spear Thistle Cirsium vulgare, Blackberry Rubus fruticosus aggregate, Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna, Artichoke Thistle Cynara cardunculus, Paterson’s Curse Echium plantagineum, African Love Grass Eragrostis curvula, Montpellier Broom Genista monspessulana, Serrated Tussock Nassella trichotoma and Sweet Briar Rosa rubignosa. Of particular note was a large infestation of Gorse Ulex europaeus located south of Watson Street and east of the Hume Highway (Plate 4).

Planted Vegetation

Planted vegetation within the Hume Freeway road reserve is mostly comprised of planted native species including Swamp Paperbark Melaleuca ericifolia, Blackwood Acacia melanoxylon, River Red-gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Slender-leaf Mallee Eucalyptus leptophylla and Southern Mahogany Eucalyptus botryoides (Plate 5).

Although many of these specimens are native to Victoria, as with most plantings along road and freeway reserves within Victoria, plantings are predominantly undertaken for amenity purposes rather than the enhancement of biodiversity values. As such, it is considered that the removal of these specimens would be exempt from requiring a planning permit in accordance with the ‘Planted Vegetation’ exemption detailed in Clause 52.17-7 of the Mitchell Shire Planning Scheme.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 17

Plate 2. Pasture grass and rows of Swamp Paperbarks Plate 3. Vegetation composition in the drainage line to along the Hume Freeway (Ecology and Heritage Partners the east of Stage 1. Note: The thicker stands of native Pty Ltd 19/10/2018). rush towards the back of this photo are outside the study area (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 19/10/2018).

Plate 4. Large infestation of Gorse at the eastern-most Plate 5. Planted non-indigenous eucalypts along Watson point in the study area along Watson Street (Ecology and Street un the lead up to the Hume Freeway overpass Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 19/10/2018) (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 19/10/2018).

3.1.1.3 Scattered Trees

There are no scattered trees or Large Trees within Stage 1.

3.1.2 Fauna Habitat

Planted Trees

Planted trees occur throughout Stage 1 and provide an important resource for arboreal fauna. The majority of the eucalypts are immature meaning that few hollows or bark fissures are likely to be present. Trees provide habitat for more mobile fauna species, vantage points and nesting areas for diurnal and nocturnal raptors, as well as stepping stones for more mobile fauna moving through the study area, enhancing landscape permeability for native fauna

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 18

Native and Introduced Grasslands

The majority of the study area consists of modified road reserves which are likely to be used as a foraging resource by common generalist bird species which are tolerant of modified open areas. Fourteen (14) fauna species were recorded within the study area during the field assessment, which consisted of nine native (e.g. Australian Magpie Cracticus tibicen, Crimson Rosella Platycercus elegans, Australian Raven Corvus coronoides) three introduced bird species (e.g. Spotted Dove Spilopelia chinensis), and two native frog species (e.g. Pobblebonk Limnodynastes dumerilii). No significant fauna species were recorded during the field assessment.

Potential habitat for the nationally significant Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis was identified in Stage 1 within the Wallan drainage line adjacent to Watson Street (Figure 2). Further information is provided in Section 3.6.2.2.

A visual inspection of the paddocks adjoining the study area’s northern boundary just west of the Hume Freeway were assessed from the study area for potential Golden Sun Moth habitat. The paddocks were dominated by exotic pasture grasses, predominantly Sweet Vernal-grass Anthoxanthum odoratum and Toowoomba Canary-grass Phalaris aquatica. No species preferred by Golden Sun Moth (i.e. Chilean Needle- grass Nassella neesiana, Spear Grass Austrostipa spp., Kangaroo Grass Themeda triandra and Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma spp.) were observed. As such, due to the absence of the preferred food plants, it was considered that targeted surveys were not required in these areas.

Stage 2 - Watson Street duplication between the Northern Highway and the Hume Freeway interchange

3.2.1 Vegetation Condition Native vegetation within the study area is representative of one EVC, being Swampy Riparian Woodland (EVC 83). The presence of this EVC is generally consistent with the modelled pre-1750s native vegetation mapping (DELWP 2019b). This EVC was recorded in a revegetation wetland immediately north of Watson Street within the Wallan Community Park (Figure 2b).

3.2.1.1 Remnant Patches

Swampy Riparian Woodland

A revegetated wetland exists along the northern boundary of Watson Street within the Wallan Community Park (Figure 2b). It is understood that the wetlands were revegetated using government funding provided to the Wallan Environment Group via a series of grants for the purposes of restoring the wetland area and enhancing ecological/biodiversity values (Merri Creek Management Committee 2018). The planted vegetation composition most closely aligns with Swampy Riparian Woodland (EVC 83), which is part of the Swampy Riparian Complex. There is a wide variety of native species present, including Silver Wattle Acacia dealbata, Silver Banksia Banksia marginata, and River Red-gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis in the canopy/overstory layer, while the understory and ground layer comprises, Black Anther Flax-lily Dianella

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 19

admixta, Hop Goodenia Goodenia ovata, Austral Indigo Indigofera australis, Rush Juncus spp., Common Tussock-grass Poa labillardierei and Caldwell’s Club-rush Bolboschoenus caldwellii (Plate 6; Plate 7).

Although the vegetation has been planted, as it is considered that the works were conducted for the purposes of enhancing biodiversity values, the removal of this vegetation is not exempt from the requirements of Clause 52.17.

3.2.1.2 Introduced and Planted Vegetation

Introduced Vegetation

Vegetation within the Stage 2 is either comprised of exotic vegetation or plated native or non-native vegetation.

The exotic vegetation within the Stage 1 mostly consists of common exotic grass species a such as Perennial Ryegrass, Toowoomba Canary-grass, White Clover and Kikuyu Pennisetum clandestinum (Plate 2). The drainage line along Stage 2’s eastern-most boundary (Figure 2a) contains a range of native and exotic vegetation, however there was not enough coverage of native species to constitute a patch given that the area was dominated by introduced species such as Common Peppercress, Water Plantain, Hop Clover and Cleavers.

Plate 6. Swampy Riparian Woodland north of Watsons Plate 7. Swampy Riparian Woodland and mown grass Street (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 19/10/2018). strip north of Watsons Street (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 19/10/2018).

Planted Vegetation

Planted vegetation along Watson Street are largely exotic street tree plantings and include Desert Ash Fraxinus angustifolia, Scotts Pine Pinus sylvestris, English Oak Quercus robur and Cork Oak Quercus suber.

3.2.1.3 Scattered Trees

There are no scattered trees or Large Trees within Stage 2.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 20

3.2.2 Fauna Habitat

Native and Introduced Grasslands

The majority of the study area consists of modified road reserves which are likely to be used as a foraging resource by common generalist bird species which are tolerant of modified open areas. No significant fauna species were recorded during the field assessment. Potential habitat for the nationally significant Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis was identified in Stage 2 within the Wallan Community Park and associated drainage line (Figure 2). Further information is provided in Section 3.6.2.2.

Stage 3 - Northern Highway duplication between Watson Street and the Hume Freeway interchange South of Wallan

3.3.1 Vegetation Condition Stage 3 largely contains exotic grasses and planted trees and shrubs, with some scattered native vegetation occasionally present.

3.3.1.1 Remnant Patches

No patches of native vegetation as defined by the Guidelines (DELWP 2017) were recorded within Stage 3.

3.3.1.2 Introduced and Planted Vegetation

Introduced Vegetation

Vegetation within the Stage 3 is comprised of a combination of exotic and planted vegetation. The ground layer is dominated by a suite of pasture grasses, predominantly Kikuyu, Toowoomba Canary-grass, Perennial Ryegrass, Sweet Vernal-grass Anthoxanthum oderatum, Yorkshire Fog Holcus lanatus and Cocksfoot Dactylis glomerata (Plate 8; Plate 9). Noxious weeds present in high abundance along the Northern Highway included Spear Thistle, Blackberry, Hawthorne and Sweet Briar.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 21

Plate 8. Exotic grasses in the Northern Hwy road reserve Plate 9. Exotic grasses in the Northern Hwy road reserve (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 06/12/2018). (Ecology and Heritage Partners Pty Ltd 06/12/2018).

Planted Vegetation

The trees within the road reserve along the Northern Freeway comprised old roadside plantings of the Australian native, Southern Mahogany, Sugar Gum Eucalyptus cladocalyx and Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata. A large section of the road reserve where the Northern Highway intersects the Duke Street Drain is comprised of a dense stand of European Elm Ulmus spp.

3.3.1.3 Scattered Trees

There are no scattered trees or Large Trees within Stage 3.

3.3.2 Fauna Habitat

Planted Trees

Planted trees occur throughout Stage 3 and provide an important resource for arboreal fauna. Some of the mature eucalypts were observed to support a range of small-sized hollows, nests, spouts (i.e. hollows in branch ends) and bark fissures during the 2019 field assessments. Four trees provide hollows up to approximately 15 centimetres, one tree contains a nest and one tree provides a spout (Figure 2, 2f-i). Trees provide habitat for more mobile fauna species, vantage points and nesting areas for diurnal and nocturnal raptors, as well as stepping stones for more mobile fauna moving through the study area, enhancing landscape permeability for native fauna.

Native and Introduced Grasslands

The majority of the study area consists of modified road reserves which are likely to be used as a foraging resource by common generalist bird species which are tolerant of modified open areas.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 22

No significant fauna species were recorded during the field assessment. However, potential habitat (albeit, marginal) for the nationally significant Golden Sun Moth Synemon plana was identified in Stage 3 (Figure 2). Further information is provided in Section 3.6.2.1.

Removal of Native Vegetation (the Guidelines)

Native vegetation within the study area is representative of one EVC, being Swampy Riparian Woodland (Stage 2 only). Although the majority of this patch is located outside of the Stage 2 study area, a small section overlaps the potential construction footprint. Although the Swampy Riparian Woodland vegetation has been planted, as it is considered that as the works were conducted for the purposes of enhancing biodiversity values, the removal of this vegetation is not exempt from the requirements of Clause 52.17.

3.4.1 Vegetation proposed to be removed Assuming all native vegetation within the proposed study area will be impacted, the study area is within Location 1, with 0.120 hectares of native vegetation proposed to be removed. As such, the permit application falls under the Basic Assessment pathway (Table 3). Condition scores for native vegetation proposed to be removed were determined as part of the habitat hectares assessment, with condition scores provided in Section 6.

Table 3. Removal of Native Vegetation (the Guidelines)

Assessment pathway Basic Total Extent 0.120 Remnant Patch (ha) 0.120 Scattered Trees (no.) 0 Large Trees within patches (no.) 0 Location Risk 1

3.4.2 Offset Targets The offset requirement for native vegetation removal is 0.033 General Habitat Units (HUs). No Species HUs are generated by the existing proposal. A summary of proposed offset requirements is presented in Table 4 and the Native Vegetation Removal (NVR) Report is presented in Appendix 4.

Table 4. Offset targets

General Offsets Required 0.033 Species Offsets Required None Vicinity (catchment / LGA) Port Phillip and Westernport CMA / Mitchell Shire Council Minimum Strategic Biodiversity Value* 0.096

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 23

Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Habitat Compensation Obligations

In accordance with the Commonwealth approval conditions of the BCS made on 5 September 2013, provided the relevant habitat compensation obligations relating to the study area are met (Attachment 2), there are no further assessments required to comply with the existing approval.

Offsets and habitat compensation fees associated with removal of native vegetation and fauna habitat under the BCS are based on the Draft Habitat Compensation under the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (DEPI 2013d), and are calculated with the following considerations: Growling Grass Frog (DEPI 2013b): • All land within the northern, north-western, western and south-eastern growth areas and the Outer Metropolitan Ring Transport Corridor mapped as Category 1 or 2 habitat will invoke a compensatory habitat fee of $8,281.90 (GST inclusive) per hectare cleared to cover the cost of establishing and managing the Growling Grass Frog corridors as set out in the Sub-regional Species Strategy;

Golden Sun Moth (DEPI 2013c): • All non-native habitat cleared will invoke a compensatory habitat fee of $8,705.40 (GST inclusive) per hectare cleared.

The study area is not labelled as ‘Potential Salvage Operations’ and salvage is therefore not required.

Based on the proposed study area, the habitat compensation obligations fees for the land subject to the BCS is $34,900.90 (GST inclusive) (Table 5; Appendix 4.2).

Table 5. Habitat compensation obligation fees for the study area within the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy.

Number of hectares/trees Costs under the BCS per Habitat compensation fee Matter of NES covered by matters of NES hectare (GST inclusive) (GST inclusive) within the study area

Growling Grass Frog 2.115 $8,281.90 $17,516.22

Golden Sun Moth 1.997 $8,705.40 $17,384.68 Total (GST inclusive) $34,900.90

Significance Assessment

3.6.1 Flora One hundred and fourteen (114) flora species (30 indigenous and 84 non-indigenous or introduced) were recorded within the study area during the field assessment. A consolidated list of flora species recorded is provided in Appendix 2.1. The VBA contains records of five nationally significant and 24 State significant flora species previously recorded within 10 kilometres of the study area (DELWP 2019d) (Appendix 3). The PMST nominated an additional 11 nationally significant species which have not been previously recorded but have the potential to occur in the locality (DoEE 2018).

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 24

A record of the State significant Small-flower Wallaby-grass Rytidosperma monticola has previously been recorded within the study area half way along the Northern Highway in 2005 (Figure 3). However, this species was not observed during the field assessment due to the high cover of Perennial Ryegrass, Sweet Vernal-grass and Toowoomba Canary-grass dominating the ground layer in these sections of the road reserve. Based on the highly modified nature of the road reserves within Stages 1, 2 and 3, landscape context, dominance by exotic flora, lack of suitable habitat and the proximity of previous records, national and State significant flora species are considered unlikely to occur within the study area (Appendix 2.2).

Recommendation

Targeted surveys for national or State significant flora are not required in Stage 1, 2 or 3.

3.6.2 Fauna The VBA contains records of 12 nationally significant, 21 State significant and nine regionally significant fauna species previously recorded within 10 kilometres of the study area (DELWP 2019d) (Appendix 4). The PMST nominated an additional two nationally significant species which have not been previously recorded but have the potential to occur in the locality (DoEE 2018). Although there are no previous significant fauna records located within the study area, there are several records of the nationally significant Golden Sun Moth in close proximity to the Wallan township. Further, there are a high number of Growling Grass Frog records located near Donnybrook adjacent to Merri Creek and Kalkallo Creek (Figure 4).

Although the study area is highly modified, based on the landscape context and the proximity of previous records, there is potential habitat within the study area for Golden Sun Moth (Stage 3) and Growling Grass Frog (Stages 1-2).

Although other national and/or significant fauna may occasionally visit the study area (i.e. birds) en-route to higher-quality habitat within the locality, both national and State significant fauna species are considered unlikely to occur to rely on habitat within the study area for foraging or breeding habitat (Appendix 3.1).

3.6.2.1 Golden Sun Moth

While dominated by exotic grasses, it is considered that the road side of the Northern Highway has the potential to provide habitat for Golden Sun Moth due to the presence of scattered Wallaby Grass Rytidosperma spp. (Figure 2, 2b, 2c). Furthermore, the VBA contains several records of the Golden Sun Moth occurring within 10 kilometres of the study area, with 14 of those records occurring approximately two kilometres west of the study area in 2016 in contiguous habitat (Figure 4). Despite targeted surveys on four separate occasions, Golden Sun Moth was not detected within potential habitat located in the road reserve of the Northern Highway. The species was detected at several known sites within Greater Melbourne on the same day as the surveys were conducted, indicating that conditions were suitable for surveying and identifying the species. As such, Golden Sun Moth is considered highly unlikely to occur within the study area. The results of these surveys are presented in a separate report (Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019).

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 25

The adjoining paddocks north of Watson Street between the wetlands and Hume Freeway were assessed from Watson Street road reserve in October 2019 to determine whether they contain viable habitat for the Golden Sun Moth, as there is the potential that Wallan Creek might be realigned to flow through the adjoining northern paddocks. The adjoining paddocks are entirely dominated by exotic grass species, such as Sweet Vernal-grass and Toowoomba Canary-grass, which are not a potential food source for the species. As such, due to the absence of the species preferred food plants, it is considered highly unlikely that Golden Sun Moth would utilise the paddock as habitat, and targeted surveys were not considered to be required.

3.6.2.2 Growling Grass Frog

Within Stages 1 and 2, the wetland/drainage line east of the Watson Street/Hume Freeway south bound exit ramp intersection, and the drainage line west of the Watson Street/Hume Freeway north bound entry ramp both contain potential habitat for Growing Grass Frog (Figure 2). Three additional locations adjoining Stages 1 and 2 of the study area also contain suitable habitat (Figure 2, 2a-c). These areas are considered suitable due to the presence of permanent water bodies such as slow-flowing streams, constructed wetlands, irrigation channels and standing water and ephemeral waterbodies including small bogs. Favoured sites include those with vegetation lining the banks and water bodies with a large proportion of emergent, submerged and floating vegetation. No Growling Grass Frogs were detected during the targeted surveys undertaken in 2018 and 2019 despite weather conditions being suitable. Based on targeted survey results, landscape context and the proximity of previous records, there is a low likelihood that the wetlands and drainage lines within the study area currently support a breeding population of Growling Grass Frogs or forms part of a dispersal corridor for the species. The results of these surveys are presented in a separate report (Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019).

3.6.3 Communities Five nationally listed ecological communities are predicted to occur within 10 kilometres of the study area (DoEE 2018). • Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Victorian Volcanic Plain; • Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-eastern Australia;

• Natural Temperate Grassland of the Victorian Volcanic Plain; • Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands (freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains; and

• White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland.

Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands (Freshwater) of the Temperate Lowland Plains is a Critically Endangered ecological community under the EPBC Act that was identified as likely to occur within 10 kilometres of the study area. However, the community is not considered to be present within the study area as the waterbodies identified within the study area are mainly constructed wetlands or stormwater treatment ponds with modified water regimes which support permanent water and do not meet the condition thresholds associated with this community.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 26

Due to the absence of large areas supporting native vegetation and the high cover of exotic and planted flora, no national or State significant ecological communities are present.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 27

4 DISCUSSION

Previous assessments conducted along the Northern Highway have recorded either no native vegetation between the Hume Highway and Watsons Street (BL&A 2010) or only small, discrete patches of grassland (Biosis 2006).

Although native grassland was previously been recorded within the road reserve of Northern Highway, this assessment was conducted in 2006, and modifications to the landscape due to agricultural activities and wed encroachment are likely to have reduced the quality to a condition where the presence of scattered native grasses no longer meet the threshold that defines a patch of native vegetation in Victoria (Table 2). A total of 114 flora species were recorded within the three stages during the field assessments. Of these, 30 were indigenous and 84 non-indigenous or introduced.

The Stage 1, 2 and 3 study areas are all in poor ecological condition, with only the constructed wetland within Stage 2 (Wallan Community Park) providing moderate ecological value. However, the wetland is located almost entirely outside the proposed footprint of Stage 2, and any impact to this vegetation, and associated habitat for Growling Grass Frog is likely to be minimal. Although potential habitat for the nationally significant Golden Sun Moth and Growling Grass Frog has been identified, targeted surveys undertaken did not record either species within potential habitats, and there is considered to be a low likelihood that either species is present or will be impacted by the proposed works (Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019).

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 28

5 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth)

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) establishes a Commonwealth process for the assessment of proposed actions likely to have a significant impact on any matters of National Environment Significance (NES), described in Table 6.

Table 6. Potential impacts to matters of National Environmental Significance (NES)

Matter of NES Potential Impacts World Heritage properties The proposed action will not impact any properties listed for World Heritage. National heritage places The proposed action will not impact any places listed for national heritage. The study area occurs 55 kilometres upstream of one Ramsar wetland (DoE 2016): Port Phillip Ramsar wetlands of Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula). international significance The proposed action is unlikely to impact the ecological character of any Ramsar wetland. There is potential habitat within the study area for two fauna species listed under the EPBC Threatened species and Act (Golden Sun Moth, Growling Grass Frog) (Section 3.6.1 and 3.6.2). However, neither ecological communities species was recorded during targeted surveys. No ecological community listed under the EPBC Act were recorded within the study area (Section 3.6.3). Migratory and marine The study area would not be classed as an ‘important habitat’ as defined under the EPBC Act species Policy Statement 1.1 Principal Significant Impact Guidelines (DoE 2013). Commonwealth marine area The proposed action will not impact any Commonwealth marine areas. Nuclear actions (including The proposed action is not a nuclear action. uranium mining) Great Barrier Reef Marine The proposed action will not impact the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Park Water resources impacted by coal seam gas or mining The proposed action is not a coal seam gas or mining development. development

5.1.1 Biodiversity Conservation Strategy In accordance with the Commonwealth approval conditions of the BCS made on 5 September 2013, provided the relevant habitat compensation obligations relating to the study area are met (Appendix 4.2 for habitat compensation obligations), there are no further assessments required to comply with the existing approval.

5.1.2 Outside the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Despite targeted surveys on four separate occasions in areas of potential habitat (Northern Highway road reserve), Golden Sun Moth was not detected within the study area. The species was detected at several known sites within Greater Melbourne on the same day as the surveys were conducted, indicating that conditions were suitable for surveying and identifying the species. As such, Golden Sun Moth is considered highly unlikely to occur within the study area.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 29

Furthermore, the paddocks north of Stage 1 to the west of the Hume Freeway are not considered to contain suitable habitat for Golden Sun Moth. The Golden Sun Moth typically occurs in native grassland and grassy woodland dominated by wallaby-grass Rytidosperma spp., Spear Grass Austrostipa spp. and Kangaroo Grass Themeda triandra, as well as in degraded grasslands dominated by the exotic Chilean Needle-grass (Nassella nessiana), which is a noxious weed. These grass species are intrinsically linked to the presence of Golden Sun Moth and integral to the viability of a population of the species. The paddocks north of Stage 1 are not considered to contain suitable habitat due to none of these grass species being observed during the field assessment, and no additional surveys are required.

No Growling Grass Frogs were detected during the targeted surveys conducted in 2018 and 2019 despite weather conditions being suitable. Based on targeted survey results, landscape context and the proximity of previous records, there is a low likelihood that the wetlands within the study area currently support a breeding population of Growling Grass Frogs or forms part of a dispersal corridor for the species. Based on the results of the targeted surveys, and absence of other matters of NES within the study area, a referral under the EBPC Act is not required.

Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (Victoria)

The FFG Act is the primary legislation dealing with biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of native flora and fauna in Victoria. Proponents are required to apply for an FFG Act Permit to ‘take’ listed and/or protected flora species, listed vegetation communities and listed fish species in areas of public land (i.e. within road reserves, drainage lines and public reserves). An FFG Act permit is generally not required for removal of species or communities on private land, or for the removal of habitat for a listed terrestrial fauna species. There is suitable habitat within the study area for several ‘protected’ flora species (Appendix 2.1; Appendix 2.2) and two fauna species listed under the FFG Act (Appendix 3.1).

5.2.1 Implications There is potential habitat within the study area for several species listed or protected under the FFG Act. Several Wattles that are ‘protected’ under the FFG Act are present, with the majority of these having been planted. Planted protected or listed vegetation is not considered ‘wild’ under the FFG Act, and as such, a permit is not required to remove this vegetation. If any remnant protected flora species are proposed to be impacts within public land in Stages 1, 2 or 3, a permit under the FFG Act will be required. VicRoads should allow up to six weeks to obtain a FFG Act permit through DELWP.

Environment Effects Act 1978 (Victoria)

The Environment Effects Act 1978 provides for assessment of proposed actions that are capable of having a significant effect on the environment via the preparation of an Environment Effects Statement (EES). A project with potential adverse environmental effects that, individually or in combination, could be significant in a regional or State context should be referred. An action may be referred for an EES decision where:

• one of the following occurs:

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 30

o Potential clearing of 10 hectares or more of native vegetation from an area that: ▪ is of an EVC identified as endangered by DELWP;

▪ is, of Very High conservation significance; or, ▪ is not authorised under an approved Forest Management Plan or Fire Protection Plan. o Potential long-term loss of a significant proportion (1-5% depending on conservation status of species) of known remaining habitat or population of a threatened species within Victoria. • or where two or more of the following occur: o Potential clearing of 10 hectares or more of native vegetation, unless authorised under an approved Forest Management Act or Fire Protection Plan; o Matters listed under the FFG Act: ▪ Potential loss of a significant area of a listed ecological community;

▪ Potential loss of a genetically important population of an endangered or threatened species; ▪ Potential loss of critical habitat; or,

▪ Potential significant effects on habitat values of a wetland supporting migratory birds.

5.3.1 Implications Based on the current development plan, vegetation proposed for removal does not meet any thresholds that triggers a referral under the Environment Effects Act 1978 (EE Act). The EE Act does list the loss of critical habitat of a species under the FFG Act as being a trigger, however neither species was recorded during the targeted surveys, and the potential habitat for each species is not considered to be ‘critical’ habitat. As such, it is considered that a referral is not required based on biodiversity considerations.

Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Victoria)

The Planning and Environment Act 1987 outlines the legislative framework for planning in Victoria and for the development and administration of planning schemes. All planning schemes contain native vegetation provisions at Clause 52.17 which require a planning permit from the relevant local Council to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation on a site of more than 0.4 hectares, unless an exemption under clause 52.17-7 of the Victorian Planning Schemes applies (Appendix 1.5.3) or a subdivision is proposed with lots less than 0.4 hectares2. Local planning schemes may contain other provisions in relation to the removal of native vegetation (Section 5.4.1).

2 In accordance with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal’s (VCAT) decision Villawood v Greater Bendigo CC (2005) VCAT 2703 (20 December 2005) all native vegetation is considered lost where proposed lots are less than 0.4 hectares in area and must be offset at the time of subdivision.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 31

5.4.1 Local Planning Schemes The study area is located within the Mitchell Shire Council municipality. The following zoning and overlays apply (DELWP 2019f, 2019g): • Road Zone – Category 1 (RDZ1) • Land Subject to Inundation (LSIO)

• Vegetation Protection Overlay – Schedule 2 (VPO2)

5.4.1.1 Schedule 1 Vegetation Protection Overlay (VPO1)

The Hume Freeway (including the vegetation within and either side of the entry and exit ramps) is within the Vegetation Protection Overlay – Schedule 2 (VPO2). A permit under the VPO2 is not required for the removal of dead or exotic vegetation. A permit under the VPO will be required for the removal of Victorian native vegetation within the Hume Highway road reserve, even if planted. No offsets are required under the VPO.

5.4.1.2 Exemptions

Planted Vegetation

Although many planted specimens located within Stage 1, 2 and 3 are native to Victoria, as with most plantings along road and freeway reserves within Victoria, these plantings are predominantly undertaken for amenity purposes rather than the enhancement of biodiversity values. As such, it is considered that the removal of planted specimens within the road reserves are exempt from requiring a planning permit in accordance with the ‘Planted Vegetation’ exemption detailed in Clause 52.17-7 of the Mitchell Shire Planning Scheme. This does not apply to the Swampy Riparian Woodland vegetation in Wallan Community Park north of Watson Street.

5.4.2 The Guidelines The State Planning Policy Framework and the decision guidelines at Clause 52.17 (Native Vegetation) and Clause 12.01 require Planning and Responsible Authorities to have regard for ‘Permitted clearing of native vegetation - Biodiversity assessment guidelines’ (the Guidelines) (DEPI 2013). Where the clearing of native vegetation is permitted, the quantity and type of vegetation to be offset is determined using methodology specified in the Guidelines. The primary objective of the regulations is “no net loss in the contribution made by native vegetation to Victoria’s biodiversity”.

5.4.3 Implications Assuming all native vegetation within the proposed study area will be impacted, the study area is within Location 1, with 0.120 hectares of native vegetation proposed to be removed. As such, the permit application falls under the Basic Assessment pathway

The offset requirement for native vegetation removal is 0.033 General Habitat Units (HUs). No Species HUs are generated by the existing proposal.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 32

A Planning Permit from Mitchell Shire Council is required to remove, destroy or lop any native vegetation (except where the ‘Planted Vegetation’ exemption applies). A permit under the VPO2 will be required to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation within the Hume Highway corridor.

Wildlife Act 1975 and Wildlife Regulations 2013 (Victoria)

The Wildlife Act 1975 (and associated Wildlife Regulations 2013) is the primary legislation in Victoria providing for protection and management of wildlife. Authorisation for habitat removal may be obtained under the Wildlife Act 1975 through a licence granted under the Forests Act 1958, or under any other Act such as the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Any persons engaged to remove, salvage, hold or relocate native fauna during construction must hold a current Management Authorisation under the Wildlife Act 1975, issued by DELWP.

Water Act 1989 (Victoria)

The purposes of the Water Act 1989 are manifold but (in part) relate to the orderly, equitable, efficient and sustainable use of water resources within Victoria. This includes the provision of a formal means of protecting and enhancing environmental qualities of waterways and their in-stream uses as well as catchment conditions that may affect water quality and the ecological environments within them. A ‘works on waterways’ permit from Melbourne Water is likely to be required where any action impacts on waterways within the study area, including the installation of structures within or across waterways that potentially interfere with the passage of fish or the quality of aquatic habitat.

Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 (Victoria)

The Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 (CaLP Act) contains provisions relating to catchment planning, land management, noxious weeds and pest animals. Landowners are responsible for the control of any infestation of noxious weeds and pest fauna species to minimise their spread and impact on ecological values. Several weeds listed as noxious under the CaLP Act were recorded during the assessment (Spear Thistle, Blackberry, Hawthorn, Artichoke Thistle, Paterson’s Curse, African Love Grass, Montpellier Broom, Serrated Tussock, Sweet Briar and Gorse). Similarly, there is evidence that the study area is currently occupied by several pest fauna species listed under the CaLP Act (European Rabbit, Red Fox). Weed and a pest fauna management actions should be incorporated into a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the project prior to commencing any works.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 33

6 HABITAT HECTARE ASSESSMENT

One patch of native vegetation was recorded within and immediately adjacent to Stage 2 (north of Watson Street). The condition and extent of the patch of native vegetation was quantified via a habitat hectare assessment by an accredited ecologist using the methodology described in the Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual (DSE 2004). The habitat hectare score for the patch of Swampy Riparian Woodland north of Watson Street is detailed in Table 7.

Table 7. Habitat hectares assessment for native vegetation recorded within the study area

Vegetation Zone SRW1 Bioregion Central Victorian Uplands EVC / Tree Swampy Riparian Woodland EVC Number 83 EVC Conservation Status Endangered Large Old Trees /10 0 Canopy Cover /5 2 Under storey /25 10 Lack of Weeds /15 11 Patch Recruitment /10 1 Condition Organic Matter /5 5 Logs /5 2 Treeless EVC Multiplier 1.00 Subtotal = 31.00 Landscape Value /25 2 Habitat Points /100 33 Habitat Score 0.33

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 34

7 MITIGATION MEASURES

Mitigation Measures

Under the Guidelines (DELWP 2017a), the three-step approach (avoid, minimise, offset) is the key policy in relation to the removal of native vegetation to achieve no net loss to biodiversity as a result of the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation. Efforts to avoid the removal of, and minimise the impacts on, native vegetation should be commensurate with the biodiversity and other values of the native vegetation and focused on areas of native vegetation that have the most value. Areas of native vegetation to be retained, including native vegetation adjoining the study area, must be able to maintain the same values in the future and should not be degraded over time by a proposed use or development associated with the removal. All applications to remove native vegetation must provide an avoid and minimise statement. The statement describes any efforts to avoid the removal of and minimise the impacts on the biodiversity and other values of native vegetation, and how these efforts focussed on areas of native vegetation that have the most value. The statement should include a description of the following: • Strategic level planning – any regional or landscape scale strategic planning process that the site has been subject to that avoided and minimised impacts on native vegetation across a region or landscape. • Site level planning – how the proposed use or development has been sited or designed to avoid and minimise impacts on native vegetation.

• That no feasible opportunities exist to further avoid and minimise impacts on native vegetation without undermining the key objectives of the proposal.

7.1.1 Avoid and Minimisation Statement A total of 0.120 hectares of native vegetation is proposed to be impacted. In order to cater for predicted growth in the Wallan township, Watson Street is proposed to be duplicated in a manner which ensures continued road safety. It may be possible to minimise impacts to the Swampy Riparian Woodland vegetation within the Wallan Community Park. However, in this instance, public safety should be prioritised when designing the road duplication without unnecessarily compromising the feasibility of the project. As such, given the project will be assessed under the Basic Assessment pathway, impacts to 0.120 hectares of vegetation are considered acceptable in this instance

Best Practice Mitigation Measures

7.2.1 General Mitigation Measures Recommended general measures to mitigate impacts upon terrestrial and aquatic values present within the study area may include: • Consideration of Water Sensitive Urban Design techniques such as stormwater treatment wetlands, bio-retention systems, porous paving or swales;

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 35

• Minimise impacts to native vegetation and habitats through construction and micro-siting techniques, including fencing retained areas of native vegetation. If indeed necessary, trees should be lopped or trimmed rather than removed. Similarly, soil disturbance and sedimentation within wetlands should be avoided or kept to a minimum, to avoid, or minimise impacts to fauna habitats; • All contractors should be aware of ecologically sensitive areas to minimise the likelihood of inadvertent disturbance to areas marked for retention. Habitat Zones (areas of sensitivity) should be included as a mapping overlay on any construction plans; • Tree Retention Zones (TRZs) should be implemented to prevent indirect losses of native vegetation during construction activities (DSE 2011). A TRZ applies to a tree and is a specific area above and below the ground, with a radius 12 x the DBH. At a minimum standard a TRZ should consider the following: o A TRZ of trees should be a radius no less than two metres or greater than 15 metres;

o Construction, related activities and encroachment (i.e. earthworks such as trenching that disturb the root zone) should be excluded from the TRZ; o Where encroachment exceeds 10% of the total area of the TRZ, the tree should be considered as lost and offset accordingly; o Directional drilling may be used for works within the TRZ without being considered encroachment. The directional bore should be at least 600 millimetres deep;

o The above guidelines may be varied if a qualified arborist confirms the works will not significantly damage the tree (including stags / dead trees). In this case the tree would be retained and no offset would be required; and,

o Where the minimum standard for a TRZ has not been met an offset may be required. • Removal of any habitat trees or shrubs (particularly hollow-bearing trees) should be undertaken between February and September to avoid the breeding season for the majority of fauna species. If any habitat trees or shrubs are proposed to be removed, this should be undertaken under the supervision of an appropriately qualified zoologist to salvage and translocate any displaced fauna. A Fauna Management Plan may be required to guide the salvage and translocation process;

• Where possible, construction stockpiles, machinery, roads, and other infrastructure should be placed away from areas supporting native vegetation, LOTs and/or wetlands; • Ensure that best practice sedimentation and pollution control measures are undertaken at all times, in accordance with Environment Protection Authority guidelines (EPA 1991; EPA 1996; Victorian Stormwater Committee 1999) to prevent offsite impacts to waterways and wetlands; and, • As indigenous flora provides valuable habitat for indigenous fauna, it is recommended that any landscape plantings that are undertaken as part of the proposed works are conducted using indigenous species sourced from a local provenance, rather than exotic deciduous trees and shrubs. A brief list of suitable species that could be utilised for revegetation /landscaping purposes is provided in Table 8 (Swampy Riparian Woodland EVC), and Table 9 (all other road reserves).

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 36

Table 8. Species list for revegetation/landscape works for Swampy Riparian Woodland (EVC 83).

Vegetation Life Form Species Name Common Name Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red-gum Large Tree Species Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum Exocarpos cupressiformis Cherry Ballart Understorey Tree/Large Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle Leptospermum lanigerum Woolly Tea-tree Leptospermum continentale Prickly Tea-tree Medium Shrub Indigofera australis Austral Indigo Coprosma quadrifida Prickly Currant-bush Senecio minimus Shrubby Fireweed Large Herb Lycopus australis Australian Gipsywort Poa labillardierei Common Tussock-grass Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush Juncus procerus Tall Rush Graminoides Dianella revoluta s.s. Black-anther Flax-lily Bolboschoenus caldwellii Caldwell’s Seas Rush Carex appressa Tall Sedge Lomandra filiformis Wattle Mat-rush Scramblers/Climbers Billardiera scandens Common Appleberry

Table 9. Species list for revegetation/landscape works for Stages 1, 2 and 3 (EVC’s 23 and 55).

Vegetation Life Form Species Name Common Name Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red-gum Large Tree Species Eucalyptus obliqua Messmate Stringybark Eucalyptus dives Broad-leaved Peppermint Allocasuarina littoralis Black Sheoak Understorey Tree/Large Shrub Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Hovea heterophylla Common Hovea Small Shrub Acrotriche prostrata Trailing Ground-berry Senecio minimus Shrubby Fireweed Senecio quadridentatus Cotton Fireweed Large Herb Senecio minimus Shrubby Fireweed Senecio quadridentatus Coton Fireweed Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush Lomandra filiformis Wattle Mat-rush Graminoids Poa ensiformis Sword Tussock-grass Themeda triandra Kangaroo Grass

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 37

Vegetation Life Form Species Name Common Name Lomandra filiformis Wattle Mat-rush Hardenbergia violeacea Purple-coral pea Scramblers/Climbers Clematis aristata Mountain Clematis

In addition to these measures, the following documents should be prepared and implemented prior to any construction activities: • Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). The CEMP should include specific species/vegetation conservation strategies, daily monitoring, sedimentation management, site specific rehabilitation plans, weed, pest and pathogen management measures, etc.; • Significant Species Conservation Management Plan (CMP). A CMP will be required if significant species or their habitats are proposed to be impacted (Growling Grass Frog, Golden Sun Moth); and, • Fauna Management Plan. This may be required if habitat for common fauna species is likely to be impacted and salvage and translocation must be undertaken to minimise the risk of injury or death to those species.

7.2.2 Mitigation of Impacts to Matters of National Environmental Significance The study area supports potential habitat for two species of National Environmental Significance (NES). A summary of mitigation measures to minimise potential impacts to matters of NES, based on the significant impact guidelines for Golden Sun Moth and Growling Grass Frog (DEWHA 2009a; DEWHA 2009b) is provided in Table 10.

Table 10. Matters of NES Assessment of Impact and Mitigation Measures

n n

MNES at Mitigation Measure(s)

risk

measures measures

Impact without without Impact

Residual Risk with RiskResidualwith

mitigationmeasures mitigationmeasures

Impact with mitigation with Impact Risk without mitigatio Riskwithout

Low. Significant impact if habitat loss, degradation or fragmentation of Low. No GSM Targeted surveys did not record the greater than 0.5 recoded during Golden Sun presence of Golden Sun Moth due to poor hectares of targeted Moth habitat quality. Measures to mitigate

confirmed habitat surveys. surveys. impacts are not required in this instance. (DEWHA 2009a). No reserve. road GSM recorded during targeted

surveys.

Likely significant a Likely impact species if

Low. NoGSM Low. during recoded targeted confirmed Northern the confirmed within Highway

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 38

n n

MNES at Mitigation Measure(s)

risk

measures measures

Impact without without Impact

Residual Risk with RiskResidualwith

mitigationmeasures mitigationmeasures

Impact with mitigation with Impact Risk without mitigatio Riskwithout

Low. GGF not are recorded during GGF not recorded during targeted

targeted surveys. indirect

surveys. habitat

Potential impact if Low. Impacts if if mitigation the action results in Mitigation measures should include the to potential the alteration of construction of temporary fencing and GGF habitat GGF

Growling aquatic vegetation habitat no-go areas adjacent to any potential are likely to be

Grass Frog diversity and/or habitat. minimised via potential structure, or Pre-construction salvage and implementation hydrology resulting of mitigation

potential potential translocation surveys should be mitigation measures mitigation

in a reduction in not measures place. in undertaken to mitigate potential future measures be minimised via minimised be of implementation habitat quality impacts.

(DEWHA 2009b). Potential. impacts based on

impacts to Low

Impacts to Low. likely to likely

7.2.3 State (The Guidelines)

7.2.3.1 Offset Strategy

Ecology and Heritage Partners are a DELWP accredited OTC offset broker.

Ecology and Heritage Partners can confirm that the likely offset obligations generated by this proposal can be satisfied through existing credits registered in our OTC database. Several landowners registered in our offset database have suitable General HU native vegetation credits available within Port Phillip and Westernport CMA, and the relevant offset obligations generated by this proposal can be secured through an OTC scheme without any difficulty.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 39

8 CONCLUSION

The Biodiversity Investigation and Habitat Hectare Assessments for the Wallan Area Network Improvement Project confirmed that the study area is largely dominated by exotic pasture grasses (e.g. Toowoomba Canary- grass, Kikuyu, Cocksfoot) and planted trees (e.g. Sugar Gum, Southern Mahogany, Oak, Desert Ash) not native to Victoria. One hundred and fourteen (114) flora species (30 indigenous and 84 non-indigenous or introduced) were recorded within the study area during the field assessment. Most of the indigenous species observed in the study area were planted as street or roadside trees associated with the overpass construction over the Hume Freeway or wetland recreation works in Wallan Community Park. Native vegetation within the study area is representative of one EVC, being Swampy Riparian Woodland (Stage 2 only). Although the majority of this patch is located outside of the Stage 2 study area, a small section overlaps the potential construction footprint. Although the Swampy Riparian Woodland vegetation has been planted, as it is considered that as the works were conducted for the purposes of enhancing biodiversity values, the removal of this vegetation is not exempt from the requirements of Clause 52.17. Assuming all native vegetation within the proposed study area will be impacted, the study area is within Location 1, with 0.120 hectares of native vegetation proposed to be removed. As such, the permit application falls under the Basic Assessment pathway. The offset requirement for native vegetation removal within land covered by the Guidelines is 0.033 General Habitat Units (HUs). No Species HUs are generated by the existing proposal. Ecology and Heritage Partners can confirm that the likely offset obligations generated by this proposal can be satisfied through existing credits registered in our OTC database without any difficulty.

The habitat compensation obligation fees for land covered by the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (i.e. the southern-most 600 metres of the Northern Highway) is $34,900.90 (GST inclusive). Fourteen (14) fauna species were recorded within the study area during the field assessment, which consisted of nine native and three introduced bird species, and two native frog species. No significant fauna species were recorded during the field assessment. However, there is potential habitat (albeit marginal) within the study area for two fauna species of National and State conservation significance, being Golden Sun Moth and Growling Grass Frog. Targeted surveys conducted by Ecology and Heritage did not record the presence of either species, and based on targeted survey results, landscape context and the habitat quality and extent, there is considered a low likelihood that a population of Golden Sun Moth or Growling Grass Frog persists within the study area or in the paddocks north of Watson Street. The results of the targeted surveys are provided in a separate report (Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019)

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 40

9 RECOMMENDATIONS

Further requirements associated with development of the study area, as well as additional studies or reporting that may be required, are provided in Table 11.

Table 11. Further requirements associated with development of the study area

Relevant Legislation Implications Further Action In accordance with the Commonwealth approval conditions of the BCS made on 5 September 2013, provided the relevant habitat compensation obligations relating to the study area are met (Appendix Environment 4.2 for habitat compensation obligations), there are no Protection and further assessments required to comply with the Biodiversity existing approval. No action required. Conservation Act No Golden Sun Moths or Growling Grass Frogs were 1999 observed during targeted surveys in 2018 or 2019 in areas outside the BCS. Based on the results of the targeted surveys, and absence of other matters of NES within the study area, a referral under the EBPC Act is not required.

There is potential habitat within the study area for several species listed or protected under the FFG Act. Several Wattles that are ‘protected’ under the FFG Act are present, with the majority of these having been planted. Planted protected or listed vegetation is not An FFG Act permit will likely be required to Flora and Fauna considered ‘wild’ under the FFG Act, and as such, a remove ‘protected’ species from within the Guarantee Act 1988 permit is not required to remove this vegetation. road reserve. If any remnant protected flora species are proposed to be impacts within public land in Stages 1, 2 or 3, a permit under the FFG Act will be required. VicRoads should allow up to six weeks to obtain a FFG Act permit through DELWP.

Based on the current development plan, vegetation proposed for removal does not meet any thresholds that triggers a referral under the Environment Effects Act 1978 (EE Act). The EE Act does list the loss of critical The Project is highly unlikely to require to be Environment Effects habitat of a species under the FFG Act as being a referred under the EE Act (based solely on Act 1978 trigger, however the potential impact on Golden Sun biodiversity considerations). Moth and Growling Grass Frog within the study area (both listed under the FFG Act) are highly unlikely to exceed the threshold.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 41

Relevant Legislation Implications Further Action Assuming all native vegetation within the proposed study area will be impacted, the study area is within Location 1, with 0.120 hectares of native vegetation proposed to be removed. As such, the permit application falls under the Basic Assessment pathway The offset requirement for native vegetation removal is Planning and 0.033 General Habitat Units (HUs). No Species HUs are Finalise development plan. Prepare a Environment Act 1987 generated by the existing proposal. planning permit. A Planning Permit from Mitchell Shire Council is required to remove, destroy or lop any native vegetation (except where the ‘Planted Vegetation’ exemption applies). A permit under the VPO2 will be required to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation within the Hume Highway corridor. A ‘works on waterways’ permit will likely be A ‘works on waterways’ permit from Melbourne Water required. is likely to be required where any action impacts on If structures are to be installed within or waterways within the study area, including the Water Act 1989 across waterways that potentially interfere installation of structures within or across waterways with the passage of fish or the quality of that potentially interfere with the passage of fish or the aquatic habitat, these activities will likely be quality of aquatic habitat. referred to DELWP with the Port Phillip and Westernport CMA included for comment. Conduct a pre-clearance survey, and depending on the whether fauna is found, a Several nests and hollows were observed during the fauna salvage process would then be Wildlife Act 1975 field assessment. recommended to remove fauna species from these nests and hollows during the project’s tree clearance phase. Ten species are recorded within the study area that are Catchment and Land listed under the CaLP Act. To meet requirements under Manage weeds in accordance with the CaLP Protection Act 1994 the CaLP Act, listed noxious weeds should be Act. appropriately controlled throughout the study area.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 42

10 GLOSSARY OF TERMS

A glossary of terms used throughout this report is provided in Table 12.

Table 12. Glossary of Terms

Acronym Description CaLP Act Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 CMA Catchment Management Authority DBH Diameter at Breast Height DELWP Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning DEPI (former) Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries DoEE Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy DSE (former) Department of Sustainability and Environment EES Environment Effects Statement EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 EVC Ecological Vegetation Class FFG Act Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 FIS Flora Information System GGF Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis GSM Golden Sun Moth Synemon plana HabHa Habitat Hectare LT Large Tree NES National Environment Significance NVIM Tool Native Vegetation Information Management Tool OTC Over-the-Counter PMST Protected Matters Search Tool ST Small Tree TRZ Tree Retention Zone TRZ Tree Retention Zone VBA Victorian Biodiversity Atlas (DELWP)

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 43

REFERENCES

Biosis Research 2006. Flora and Fauna Assessment of the Northern Highway – Wallan to Kilmore, Victoria. Report prepared for VicRoads. March 2006. BL&A 2010. Northern Highway Duplication, Wallan to Kilmore: Flora and Fauna Assessment. Report prepared by Brett Lane & Associates Pty Ltd for VicRoads – Planning Investigations. January 2010. DELWP 2017a. Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria.

DELWP 2017b. Assessor’s handbook – applications to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation (Assessor’s handbook). Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2017c. Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Protected Flora List – June 2017. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019a. Native Vegetation Information Management Tool [www Document]. URL: . Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019b. NatureKit [www Document]. URL: . Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019c. Ecological Vegetation Class (EVC) Benchmarks for each Bioregion [www Document]. URL: . Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019d. Victorian Biodiversity Atlas. Sourced from GIS layers: “VBA_FLORA25”, “VBA_FLORA100”, “VBA_FAUNA25”, “VBA_FAUNA100”, February 2018. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019e. Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Threatened List – April 2018. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria. DELWP 2019f. Planning Maps Online [www Document]. URL: . Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria.

DELWP 2019g. Planning Schemes Online [www Document]. URL: http://planningschemes.dpcd.vic.gov.au. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria.

DEPI 2013a. Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Melbourne’s Growth Corridors. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne, May 2013.

DEPI 2013b. Sub-Regional Species Strategy for the Growling Grass Frog. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne, May 2013.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 44

DEPI 2013c. Sub-Regional Species Strategy for the Golden Sun Moth. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne, May 2013.

DEPI 2013d. Draft Habitat Compensation under the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: Melbourne Strategic Assessment. Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne, May 2013. DEWHA 2009a. Significant impact guidelines for the critically endangered golden sun moth (Synemon plana). Nationally threatened species and communities. EPBC Act policy statement 3.12. Published by the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Canberra, ACT. DEWHA 2009b. Significant impact guidelines for vulnerable growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis). Nationally threatened species and communities. EPBC Act policy statement 3.14. Published by the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Canberra, ACT.

DoE 2013. Matters of National Significance: Significant impact guidelines 1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Environment and Energy, Canberra, ACT. DoEE 2018. Protected Matters Search Tool: Interactive Map [www Document]. URL: . Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra, ACT. DSE 2004. Vegetation quality assessment manual: Guidelines for applying the habitat hectares scoring method. Version 1.3. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne Victoria.

DSE 2009a. Sub-Regional Species Strategy for the Southern Brown Bandicoot. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, October 2009. DSE 2009b. Advisory list of Threatened Invertebrate Fauna in Victoria – 2009. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, Victoria. DSE 2011. Native Vegetation Technical information sheet: Defining an acceptable distance for tree retention during construction works. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, Victoria. DSEWPaC 2012. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Environmental Offsets Policy. Commonwealth Department of Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra, ACT. Ecology and Heritage Partners 2014. Environment Effects Statement (Flora and Fauna): Kilmore to Wallan Bypass. Report prepared for VicRoads. May 2014. Ecology and Heritage Partners 2019. Targeted Surveys for Golden Sun Moth and Growling Grass Frog: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Report prepared for VicRoads. March 2019.

EPA 1991. Construction Techniques for Sediment Pollution Control. Published document prepared by the Victorian Environment Protection Authority, Melbourne, Victoria. EPA 1996. Environmental Guidelines for Major Construction Sites. Published document prepared by the Victorian Environmental Protection Authority, Melbourne, Victoria. Gullan, P 2017. Illustrated Flora Information System of Victoria (IFLISV). Viridans Pty Ltd, Victoria.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 45

Merri Creek Management Committee 2018. A Brief History of the Wallan Environment Group . Merri Creek Management Committee, East Brunswick, Victoria. Victorian Urban Stormwater Committee 1999. Urban Stormwater: Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines. CSIRO, Collingwood, Victoria.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 46

FIGURES

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 47 Wild Duck Lake Legend Lake Heathcote Mittagong Junction Study Area Da rraw Sout eit R h Mount d ain Rd Railway

Freeway d R e r Major Road o m il K Collector Road - g in p Minor Road p E Proposed Road Walking Track

t

S

h Minor Watercourse

g

i H Permanent Waterbody Wallan Land Subject to Inundation W atson St Wa llan - Whi Wetland/Swamp ttlesea Rd Wallan Crown Land

d ! ! !

R

y

! !

w e

Upper Plenty ! Localities r

H

o

n y m

r w l i e F K h

t e -

r

o m u g N n H i Mitchell (S) p p Wallan E ^_

k

e

e Melbourne r (!

C

i

r

r

e

d M

R

y e n Figure 1 d y

S

d Location of the study area l O Biodiversity Assessment for Watson Street Northern Highway to Hume Freeway Beveridge Duplication

0 500 1,000

¹ Metres d

R

g

n

a

i

r

r

e

M

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information. 11416_Fig01_StudyArea 4/01/2019 jyuan t

S

h

g

i H Watson St Wallan - Whittl esea Rd

!.

y !. w GF F e m u kj H

y

w

H

n

r

e

h

t

r

o

N

!.

!.

Figure 2 Overview Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area Growling Grass Frog ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment potential habitat surveyed ¹ !. Tree with hollows for Watson Street kj Tree with nest Golden Sun Moth potential Northern Highway to habitat surveyed 0 170 340 GF Tree with spout Metres Hume Freeway Planted vegetation Melbourne MSA BCS Extent (! Duplication Ecological Vegetation Class Stage 1 Swampy Riparian VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or Stage 2 completeness of information in this publication and any person using or Woodland relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria Stage 3 shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 Watson St

Wal lan - W hittles ea Rd

y w F e m u H

Figure 2a Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area Growling Grass Frog ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment potential habitat surveyed ¹ Stage 1 for Watson Street Planted vegetation Stage 2 0 45 90 Northern Highway to Ecological Vegetation Class Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway Swampy Riparian (! Duplication Woodland

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 W atson St

Figure 2b Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area Growling Grass Frog ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment potential habitat surveyed ¹ Stage 2 for Watson Street Ecological Vegetation Class 0 20 40 Northern Highway to Swampy Riparian Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway Woodland (! Duplication

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 W atson St

Figure 2c Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area Growling Grass Frog ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment potential habitat surveyed ¹ Stage 2 for Watson Street Ecological Vegetation Class 0 20 40 Northern Highway to Swampy Riparian Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway Woodland (! Duplication

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 W atson St

t

S

h

g

i

H

Figure 2d Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ Stage 2 for Watson Street Stage 3 Northern Highway to 0 20 40 Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway (! Duplication

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 t

S

h

g

i

H

y

w

H

n

r

e

h

t

r

o

N

Figure 2e Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ Stage 3 for Watson Street Golden Sun Moth potential 0 20 40 Northern Highway to habitat surveyed Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway (! Duplication

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 y

w

H

n

r

e

h

t

r

o

N

!.

Figure 2f Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ !. Tree with hollows for Watson Street Tree protection zone Northern Highway to 0 20 40 Stage 3 Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway (! Duplication Golden Sun Moth potential habitat surveyed VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 !.

GF

kj

y

w

H

n

r

e

h

t

r

o

N

Figure 2g Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ !. Tree with hollows for Watson Street kj Tree with nest 0 20 40 Northern Highway to GF Tree with spout Hume Freeway Melbourne Metres Tree protection zone (! Duplication Stage 3 VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or Golden Sun Moth potential completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria habitat surveyed shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 y

w

H

n

r

e

h

t

r

o

N

!.

Figure 2h Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ !. Tree with hollows for Watson Street Tree protection zone Northern Highway to 0 20 40 Stage 3 Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway (! Duplication Golden Sun Moth potential habitat surveyed VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 !.

N

o

r

t

h

e

r

n

H

w

y

Figure 2i Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ !. Tree with hollows for Watson Street Tree protection zone 0 20 40 Northern Highway to MSA BCS Extent Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway (! Duplication Stage 3 Golden Sun Moth potential VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or habitat surveyed completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 N

o

r t h

e

r n

H

w

y

y

w

F

e

m

u

H

Figure 2j Legend Mitchell (S) Ecological features Study Area ^_ Wallan Biodiversity Assessment ¹ MSA BCS Extent for Watson Street Stage 3 Northern Highway to 0 20 40 Golden Sun Moth potential Melbourne Metres Hume Freeway habitat surveyed (! Duplication

VicMap Data: The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.

11416_Fig02_EcoFeatPMB 10/12/2019 psorensen

Aerial source: Nearmap 2018 *# (! 1988 Legend 2005 )" )" 2005 1988 C l Miotnchell (S) Study Area Plum p Sw am p b )"

in d a n

R We allan Wallab y-g rass

d R g Significant flora

d S

R n ^_

l W u

l o )" i a n Purple Blow n-g rass

n d M d d o n Adam son's Blow n- N ng a a (! R y o )" d W River Red-g um C r - g rass

t r h d e r

e o e *# f r (! Rosem ary Grevillea k

n d Austral Crane's-b ill a

H o r # w * B Melbourne (! Basalt Peppercress Silurian Leek -orch id y (! (! *# Slender Bindw eed 2009 Basalt T ussock -g rass )" (! *# Slender Bitter-cress 2005 *# *# 2005 Coast Wirilda Wandong Sunday (! Curly Sedg e *# Slender T ick -trefoil 2005 Regional Creek Park Reservoir *# *# Heathcote (! Dw arf Silver-w attle Sm all Scurf-pea Junction Boyds Creek (! Sm all-flow er Wallab y- Streamside Floodplain Firew eed *# Reserve g rass 2011 )")" 2011 )"Hollow b ack )" Larg e-leaf Cinnam on- Reservoir *# Sw am p Everlasting d d 2011 w attle R R in e a GF r t )" n Sw am p Firew eed o u 2011 M Matted Flax-lily o m a l i M )" in h K t M GF u T oug h Scurf-pea Lak e Grenfell - o Melb ourne Yellow - o " S u ) g 2011 n n )" i ta g um GF p Veined Spear-g rass Ro d in m sey p Rd R R E y Wild d e Pale Sw am p l l Duck Lak e )" Wing ed Water- a GF V Wallan Wallan t Lak e Everlasting i starw ort

e Bushland Reserve Mittag ong

w )" a

r Plains Yam -daisy GF r Yellow Star

a k D e Darr e aw eit Rd r Darraweit i C rr Streamside 2010 e Reserve 2010 (! )" M

t

S

h

g d i 1974 R GF t H ei Wallan w ra W ar atson St Walla D n - Whittlesea Rd - d a d R lin o e B r

o

m 2014 l 2005 2014 i *# " K )") - 2014 )" *# 2014 *# g 2014 *# n 2010 i )"*# p

y *# 2013 )" #* (! 1993 p * E 2004 w )"*#*#*#*# )" F *#GFGF 1989 e 2010 1990 m GF u Kinglake H 1990 National 1998 Park 2002 P 2002 )" le n GF )" ty 2000 *# R 1994 iv GF e r W 2013 e s )" t 2011 (! B r a Figure 3 n

c

h 2011 Previously documented significant (! flora within 10km of the study area

d

R Beveridge 2008 1983 n Biodiversity Assessment for Watson Bushland a 2011 l (! *# l Reserve a *# (!(! )" 1984 W Street Northern Highway to Hume 2008 r e )" 2011 iv 2011 GF 1983 *# GF R Freeway Duplication GF ty GF n 2006 2011 2011 le (! P d GF 2016 R 2011 2011 Gle )" y nb ur 2016 e nie R n )" M d d )" 1991 )" 0 2 4 GF )" )" e 2016 y 2011 )" 2011 C *# r S 1992 lark s R d 2011 r d l i O 2011 *# a

n

2009 g Kilom etres

)" R *# 2009 d ¹ 2009 )" 1992 GF 2005 (! )" (! *# 1998 1990 GF (! 1990 )" )")" )" 2009 )" )" 1990 *# 2010 *# " 1998 )GF )" )" )" 2009 *# )" 1991 *# 2011 *#*# 1992 2005 k e )" )" 2011 2005 k *# e e 2011 1992

r e

(! *# *# *# 2010 r C 1992

2007 C

2009 )" Gr d p 2009 ants Rd

n e ! R ( 2009 i e 2008 *# )" GF b # 2009 y D * t GF *#*# *# e 2009 r *#*# n 2008 *# a VBA 2018. Victorian Biodiversity Atlas // Sourced from : ‘VBA_FLORA25’, ‘VBA_FLORA100’, ‘VBA_FAUNA25’ and )" ")" 2009 e )")")" l GF )" *#*# *# 2012 D ‘VBA_FAUNA100’, January 2018 © T h e State of Victoria, Departm ent of Environm ent, Land, Water and Planning . *# P 2010 )" )""))" 2009 Records prior to 1949 not sh ow n. )")" )""))")")" *# 2015 *#*# (! )")")" ))")")")"*# *#*#*#*# 2010 )")" *# # 2009 VicMap Data: T h e State of Victoria does not w arrant th e accuracy or com pleteness of inform ation in th is pub lication )")")" (! * and any person using or relying upon such inform ation does so on th e b asis th at th e State of Victoria sh all b ear no Donnyb r ook Rd 2015 2015 2009 responsib ility or liab ility w h atsoever for any errors, faults, defects or om issions in th e inform ation. 11416_Fig03_SigFlora 17/10/2018 melsley Legend 1999 (! C (! l on *# 2013 Mitcbhell (S) Study Are a Hoode d Rob in

in d a n

R We allan *#

d R La th a m's Snipe g Significant fauna

d S

R n ^_

l W u l o i a n n d *# M d d o n (! Austra la sia n Bitte rn Le a db e a te r's Possum ng a a R y d W C - (! *# Little Button-qua il r d Ba rking Owl e r 1999 o e f k ! d (! *# ( a Bla ck Fa lcon Ma cqua rie Pe rch )" o r B Melbourne *# (! (! Bla ck-e a re d Cuckoo Murra y Cod 2012 Wandong GF N (! Brown Toa dle t Musk Duck o

r

t h GF Pa inte d Hone ye a te r e (! Brown Tre e cre e pe r r Wandong Sunda y n

Regional Cre e k (south -e a ste rn ssp.) GF H Pla ins-wa nde re r

w Park Re se rvoir y 2016 Brush -ta ile d )" (! GF Re d-ch e ste d Button- Boyds Creek Ph a scog a le qua il Streamside Heathcote (! Reserve Junction Common Dunna rt GF Hollowb a ck Roya l Spoonb ill d Re se rvoir )" R Dia mond Fire ta il d GF in Silve r Pe rch R ta e n r u )" o o M Ea ste rn Gre a t Eg re t M South e rn Brown m a l h GF i t i u n K o M Ba ndicoot La ke Gre nfe ll - S o Ea ste rn Horse sh oe u )" g n n i ta Ba t GF Ro d p in South e rn Toa dle t mse y p Rd R 1989 R 1988 E y Wild d e Ea ste rn Sna ke - l GF ÛÚ l 1989 Duck La ke )" Spe ckle d Wa rb le r a 1989 )" ! V (ÛÚ (! t (! 1990 La ke ne cke d Turtle i 1989 e ÛÚ ÛÚ ÛÚÛÚ *# Mitta g ong ÛÚ Spotte d Ha rrie r w ÛÚ ÛÚ GF " a *# ) r 1990 Fa t-ta ile d Dunna rt r GF

a 1989 1988 ÛÚ k ÛÚ Spotte d Q ua il-th rush D e 1981 1990 Da rr e )" 1990 a we it Rd r 1988 Golde n Pe rch Darraweit i C ÛÚ 1989 rr 1988 )" GF ÛÚ Stripe d Le g le ss Liza rd Streamside 1970 2016 e )" Reserve GF ÛÚ )" M Golde n Sun Moth ")" ÛÚ ) t 1981 )" 2016 1970 Swift Pa rrot

S 1981 *# Gra ssla nd Ea rle ss 2016 h 1990 )" )" g (! ÛÚ Tussock Skink d i R Dra g on it )" 2016 H Wallan e 1968 a w # ÛÚ Two-spine d Bla ckfish rr W 2005 * Growling Gra ss Frog a atson St Walla GF D n - Whittlesea Rd - 1991 d 1988 a ÛÚ ÛÚ d R *# Wh ite -th roa te d lin y ÛÚ Ha rdh e a d ÛÚ o e B 2016 w r 1988

o Ne e dle ta il F 2002 2016 " e (! 1989 ))" 2017 m " l ))"ÛÚ m GF *# i GF 2016 )"") u K )" - ÛÚ ) 2016 H 2002 2016 g n 2016 i 1988 2016 p 1991 1988 )" p 2016 )" 1990 E (! (! 1990 1970 1990 (! (! *# 1990 1990 GFÛÚ *# Kinglake 1989 1991 ÛÚ National GF*# )" Park 1989 P 1989 *# le n 1989 ty R iv e r W e s 1991 t 1988 B (! r 1991 *# 1988 a Figure 4 (! 1988 n )" 1991 (! c 1989 (! ÛÚ (! h (! 1988 Previously documented significant 1989 " 1988 ) (!(! 1988 1991 2016 fauna within 10km of the study area ÛÚ 1991 *#*# (! d 1989 1991 R 1991 *#*# n Biodiversity Assessment for Watson a

Beveridge Bushland Reserve l

l

a

2015 W Street Northern Highway to Hume (! r e iv (! )" 1988 2017 R Freeway Duplication 2002 ty 2002 *# n *# 1988 1989 e d *# 1995 l R 2002 *# P y 2002 ÛÚ e *#*# ÛÚ n Gle d 2002 nb urn y *# ie Rd S 2002 0 2 4 ld 2002 Cla r O *# 2002 ks Rd 2002 *# 1988 1995 1988 ÛÚ Kilome tre s

*#ÛÚ 2014 d (! ÛÚ (! 1988 1995 )" R 1988 ! ¹ ( 2005 g 1988 1989 n

a

(! i GF 1989 r (! r ÛÚ e 2003 # )" *# * M 2009 *# *# 1988 2012 )" *# 1988 )" 1989 )" *# 2010 2012 *#*# 1989 k *# # k e *# )" e e 2008 )" 2012

r 2002 e 2008 2010 r C 2012 C

Gra d p 2008 )" )")")")"" 2008 2012 nts Rd )"))" 2013 n e R )")")")")" 2010 i e )" )" )")" )" *# ") ) b )" )")")")" )"") *# 2012 )" y D ) t 2008 )" )")")" )" e )" )" 2008 1983 2013 r )")")" 1988 n a VBA 2018. Victoria n Biodive rsity Atla s // Source d from: ‘VBA_ FLORA25’, ‘VBA_ FLORA100’, ‘VBA_ FAUNA25’ a nd 2016 2010 )" e l 2008 2008 *# GF D ‘VBA_ FAUNA100’, Ja nua ry 2018 © Th e Sta te of Victoria , De pa rtme nt of Environme nt, La nd, Wa te r a nd Pla nning . *# *# 2013 P 2008 ÛÚ GF 1990 2002 *# 2002 )" Re cords prior to 1949 not sh own. 2016 ÛÚ *# 1983 ÛÚ 2009 *# VicMa p Da ta : Th e Sta te of Victoria doe s not wa rra nt th e a ccura cy or comple te ne ss of informa tion in th is pub lica tion )" ÛÚ 2016 *# 2002 a nd a ny pe rson using or re lying upon such informa tion doe s so on th e b a sis th a t th e Sta te of Victoria sh a ll b e a r no Donnyb 2009 rook Rd 2009 re sponsib ility or lia b ility wh a tsoe ve r for a ny e rrors, fa ults, de fe cts or omissions in th e informa tion. 11416_Fig04_SigFauna 17/10/2018 melsley

APPENDICES

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 62

APPENDIX 1. ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 63 THE ASSIGNMENT

1 PRELIMINARY BIODIVERSITY INVESTIGATIONS TASK BRIEF – WALLAN AREA NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

1. PURPOSE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT

The purpose of this assignment is to investigate flora and fauna within the Wallan Area Network Improvements Project and deliver a detailed report including habitat hectare and habitat importance score assessments.

The project incorporates the following study areas:

1. Watson Street Interchange Upgrade (including new freeway overpass structure and southern ramps). 2. Watson Street duplication between the Northern Highway and the Hume Freeway interchange. 3. Northern Highway duplication between Watson Street and the Hume Freeway interchange South of Wallan.

The habitat hectare assessment shall include detailed mapping of all vegetation in the study area, make recommendations for managing identified flora, fauna and native vegetation issues and comply with the Permitted clearing of native vegetation - Biodiversity assessment guidelines under the Planning and Environment Act 1987.

The Assessment shall specify relevant State and Commonwealth legislation and policies (i.e. required permits and approvals) to enable VicRoads to complete the Project in a manner consistent with these requirements and with principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development. 2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Project details

The Wallan Area Network Improvements Project (known here on as the Project) is located within the as shown in Figure 1 and is within Melbourne’s Northern Growth Corridor as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1 Wallan Locality Map (image courtesy Whereis) Figure 2 Northern Growth Corridor (source Patch Plan + Design)

Access to the Hume Freeway is south of the Wallan township via the Northern Highway interchange and is the only existing southern entry and exit point. The Northern Highway exceeds capacity during peak periods and results in traffic queues that back onto the slow lanes of the Hume Freeway, increasing the potential for rear end crashes.

The existing Hume Freeway/Watson Street interchange east of the Wallan Township was constructed in the mid 1970’s and comprises northerly orientated ramps and a freeway overpass. Planning for the Hume Freeway included the future provision of southerly orientated ramps at the Watson Street interchange and land was acquired and reserved for the construction of these ramps. To cater for predicted growth in the Wallan township, an additional southern access to the Hume Freeway is proposed that would provide additional ramps to the south and a new freeway overpass at a Watson Street interchange. Watson Street would be duplicated and associated intersections upgraded between the new interchange and the Northern Highway intersection.

In combination with these changes, the Northern Highway would be duplicated to the south of Watson Street as outlined in Figure 3. It would service a large area of future residential development south of the Wallan township.

Figure 3 Proposed road network improvements in Wallan 2.2 Study Area Description

Study Area Location

The Wallan township is located at the northern extent of Melbourne’s Northern Growth Corridor as previously shown in Figure 2. The Northern Highway passes directly through the town’s centre, whilst the Hume Freeway, the principal freight route between Melbourne and Sydney, runs along the eastern side of the township.

The Northern Highway provides important arterial access to the northern areas of the state as well as servicing strong residential growth in Wallan, Kilmore and Broadford. The southern section of the Northern Highway has experienced increasing demand in recent years for access to employment, retail, health and education services predominately located in Melbourne’s metropolitan area.

The Northern Highway is the only continuous North to South route through Wallan and there are no viable alternatives. As a result, local traffic funnels towards the Highway and accumulates with traffic travelling through the town, resulting in high volumes of vehicles. The town’s central business district and shopping precinct also feature on the highway and is referred to locally as High Street. The absence of southerly orientated ramps at the Hume Freeway/Watson Street interchange, also results in greater traffic volumes using the Northern Highway to access the Hume Freeway.

Daily traffic volumes on the Northern Highway, north of the Hume Freeway now exceed 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and volumes have increased at approximately 6% per annum over the past decade. This growth is predicted to continue at a similar rate with the region’s integration into Melbourne’s Northern Growth Corridor. During PM peak times, traffic queues extend 2.5 km south of Taylors Lane traffic signals onto the left lane of the Hume Freeway, significantly increasing the risk of rear end crashes.

The majority of Wallan services are located to the west of the Hume Freeway, whilst the Wallan train station is located on the eastern side. Access between both areas of Wallan is via Watson Street. Wallan East currently comprises a commercial employment precinct and the growing communities that live in the Wallara Waters and Newbridge Estates. Wallan East is also expected to accommodate part of the proposed Beveridge Intermodal Freight Terminal. Existing traffic volumes along Watson Street are approximately 10,000 vpd (8% CV) and are predicted to increase to 32,000 vpd by 2031.

Assessment Band of Interest The Project band of interest is located within the road reserve and generally 50m each side of the Wallan- Whittlesea Road, Hume Freeway and Northern Highway. Refer to the Project area as shown in Figure 3. 2.3 Planning history

Over the last 20 years, in consultation with the local community, various studies have explored potential options for the Northern Highway strategy and the Kilmore Wallan Bypass. The studies include:

• Northern Highway B75 Corridor Strategy in 1998, • Northern Highway Duplication Study in 2005, • Kilmore Wallan Bypass Options Examination in 2008, • Kilmore-Wallan Bypass Planning Study in 2011; and • Kilmore-Wallan Bypass Environment Effects Statement in 2013.

An outline of the content of these studies and their findings are provided below:

Northern Highway B75 Corridor Strategy The Northern Highway B75 Corridor study identified future highway improvements including the need to consider construction of a Kilmore Bypass if warranted following a detailed planning study.

Northern Highway Duplication Study In December 2005, a Planning Study commenced which investigated the duplication of the Northern Highway between Kilmore and the Hume Freeway. The study found that this section of the Northern Highway would require additional capacity due to Kilmore’s growth rate and its proximity to Melbourne.

Kilmore Wallan Bypass Options Examination In 2008, the Kilmore Wallan Bypass Options Examination considered preliminary planning investigations into bypass options in the Kilmore Wallan area. In consultation with the local community, VicRoads developed and investigated the feasibility of 11 potential bypass options.

Kilmore-Wallan Bypass Planning Study In 2011, the Kilmore-Wallan Bypass Planning Study investigated alignment options that provided a bypass of both Kilmore and Wallan and were effective in reducing truck and through traffic in Kilmore and Wallan. As part of the Planning Study, the ability of the options to effectively reduce the amount of truck and general traffic in Kilmore and Wallan was one of the key considerations.

Kilmore-Wallan Bypass Environment Effects Statement In 2013, a referral under the Environment Effects Act 1978 was submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD) [now known as Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP)].

The key social effects that informed this Assessment were:

• The relative effects of each option on severance of access to community, recreational and sporting facilities and public open space; • The differing extent of acquisition of residential and rural lifestyle properties required for each option; and • Whether any option would have unacceptable social effects, resulting from displacement of residents and disruption of access to community facilities.

A business case was submitted for the Watson Street interchange and duplication project in December 2017 and a business case for the Northern Highway Duplication will be submitted in 2018/2019.

2.4 Summary of previous consultation

VicRoads has briefed the Mitchell Shire Council and is working with the Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning through the planning approval process. Consultation with the broader community was undertaken in June 2018, presenting concept plans for the interchange and Watson St duplication, and seeking local knowledge for the Northern Highway, in order to develop concept plans. 3. ASSIGNMENTTASKS

3.1 Methodology Conduct the Assignment in accordance with the methodology submitted to and approved by VicRoads (using Schedule 32), prior to the commencement of the works.

3.2 Detailed Task Descriptions

Task 1 Data and Literature Review The provider shall review relevant databases and literature to determine any recorded information relevant to the study area. Information shall be obtained from, but not limited to:  NaturePrint/NatureKit – Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP)  Native Vegetation Information Management system (NVIM) - DELWP  Victorian Biodiversity Atlas (VBA) - DELWP  Protected Matters Search Tool – Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE)  Pest, diseases and weeds (including Cinnamon Fungus and Phylloxera) – (DELWP)  Flora Information System (FIS)  Victorian Fauna Database (VFD)  Previous investigations and reports. Other databases may be relevant to specific surveys and the consultant shall search these where appropriate. Flora and fauna field data shall be collected and presented in a manner compatible with existing databases maintained by DELWP and must be provided within 6 months (or earlier if required). All data collected for VicRoads remains the property of VicRoads and should be labelled as such on presentation to DELWP for tracking purposes (unless specified otherwise). Flora and Fauna field data should be collected in GIS format compatible with VicRoads’ existing database or protocol requirements for inclusion into a GIS mapping / Environmental database.

Task 2 Field Survey The provider shall inspect the study area to confirm the results of database searches and desktop investigations for flora and fauna species listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 and Environment Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act 1999. The provider shall survey* the area in accordance with all relevant standards, current guidelines and procedures released by DELWP in relation to the conduct of Biodiversity assessments (e.g. DELWP (May 2013) Permitted Clearing of Native Vegetation Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines, including any associated assessment methodology). The consultant shall:  Describe the area surveyed;  Describe the type of survey and methodologies used, which may include: Flora / native vegetation o Flora (desktop) investigation surveys o quadrat surveys o flora inventory o habitat hectares and habitat importance score assessment o scattered tree assessment (including how scattered trees were classified into EVC’s and measured). Fauna o Fauna (desktop) investigation surveys o transect surveys o hair or scat analysis o spotlighting o stag observations  Document the amount of time taken to complete the survey;  Document the dates, time and season of survey;  Document the weather conditions (fauna only);  List the names and qualifications of participants involved in the survey;  Describe any limitations of the study including issues such as inadequate time spent at sites, poor seasonal or weather conditions for surveys, inappropriate timing of surveys, problems with access, time constraints, lack of data, problems with equipment, land management or fire.  Cite all relevant reference material including taxonomic references, personal communications and databases used.  Determine the likelihood of any threatened species to potentially occur at the site not recorded in the survey  details shall be provided on the ecological values of the study site including flora and fauna surveys, accurate extent mapping of all native vegetation (patches), trees within patches, and scattered trees present in the study area or accurate extent mapping of all native vegetation (remnant patches, trees within patches, and scattered trees and / or other affected vegetation) proposed to be affected by the draft Project works footprint   * NOTE: habitat hectares assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the DELWP (2017) Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (Guidelines) and accepted DELWP methodology requirements.

Task 3 Native Vegetation Mapping – Permitted Clearing of Native Vegetation Regulations The provider shall identify and map all native vegetation in the study area in accordance with Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (DELWP 2017) and supporting documents. All native vegetation is to be mapped to an accuracy of at least 1 m. Appropriate shapefiles of the vegetation patches, large trees in patches and scattered trees (large and small) within the Study Area or site are to be generated.

Task 4 Identify and Record Key Species, Habitats and Communities For remnant, native vegetation identified on the site, the provider shall:  Enter the collected data on the native vegetation areas into NIVM to determine the assessment pathway of the proposal and, if the project is within a Basic or Intermediate Assessment Pathway, generate a Native Vegetation Removal (NVR) report  For clearing proposals in the Detailed Assessment Pathway, enter the collected data on the native vegetation areas into the EnSym system and generate a NVR report. The project team is to be notified as soon as practicable if species offsets are triggered by the proposed clearing For listed vegetation communities and flora and fauna species under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 and Environment Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act 1999, the provider shall:

 identify, describe, record and map (where applicable) existing vegetation communities, flora and fauna species in the study area

 identify any rare, threatened, protected species/communities and provide a discussion of the significance of each category with respect to the project

 Identify/ justify the need for any separate targeted species survey

 identify any introduced/exotic species (including known exclusion zones or management areas)  identify any potential habitat for rare, threatened or protected species and provide advice regarding the likelihood of species presence

 using current project design files, calculate the area (in hectares) of confirmed and potential habitat for each rare, threatened or protected species or community that would be impacted by the project.

Task 5 Habitat Hectare Assessment – Permitted Clearing of Native Vegetation Regulations

The provider shall undertake a Habitat Hectare Assessment* of all native vegetation mapped within the Project Study area. The Habitat Hectare Assessment must comply with the Permitted clearing of native vegetation – Biodiversity assessment guidelines under the Planning and Environment Act 1987.

* NOTE: habitat hectares and habitat importance score assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the DELWP (May 2013) Permitted Clearing of Native Vegetation Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines, including any associated assessment methodology or current assessment requirements.

Task 6 Mapping Requirements

The provider shall map (accuracy of at least 1m) all native vegetation patches, scattered trees, large old trees and other relevant environmental features. Native vegetation mapping is to be provided to VicRoads as an ESRI shapefile meeting DEPI’s data standard requirements of the “Permitted Clearing of native vegetation – Meeting the moderate and high risk-based pathway application requirements” (DEPI).

The provider shall produce a CADD file Microstation Version 8 or dxf, (coordinates in MGA, zone 54) or another similar standard agreed with the Superintendent that can be utilised to map all native vegetation patches, scattered trees and other relevant environmental features.

Task 7 Habitat Hectare Assessment Report Submission

The provider shall submit to DELWP the habitat hectare assessment report including the condition score undertaken for this brief to enable the generation of a “Biodiversity impact and offset requirements” by DEPI.

Task 8 Identify Protected Species

The provider shall identify and provide a total of the number of each Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act) and Environment Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) listed species that may be impacted by the project.

Task 9 Assess Impacts

The Provider shall provide an assessment of the impacts of the proposed project on the following:

 Whether the proposed removal of native vegetation will have a significant impact on Victoria’s biodiversity, with specific regard to the proportional impact on habitat for any rare or threatened species; and

 Other environmental values.

Task 10 Identify Approvals The provider shall identify any permits, approvals or management plans that may be required for the project under the following but not limited to environmental legislation:  Wildlife Act 1975  Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988  Environment Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act 1999  Planning and Environment Act 1987  Victorian Planning Provisions and Planning Schemes  Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994  Environment Effects Act 1978. Task 11 Identify Mitigation Measures The provider shall identify any general measures and principles to mitigate the potential impacts of the project on the study area. The provider shall utilise the table below as the template to document and assess the findings and advice for Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) identified in Task 4. Table - MNES Assessment of Impact and Mitigation Measures

t

n

k t u

o s h u i o i t n s n s s n s t i o h e e e e o o R o a t i i i r r r r h i w l t t t g t i u u u u i t

MNES a a a a w t

s s s s i Mitigation Measure(s) c u w g g g t

i a i a a i a at risk a d c t t t m k e e e e i i i i

p a s s h i m m m m p m m m t m e i I R m R I w

Impacts as e n h t identified in Where the assessment has o

o

d t f n n

DotE determined that the impact to MNES e o r o o s

i i t o t t a Significant i could be significant based in the n r a a Significance b

e p g g t

impact assumption that the MNES is i i t t t c m

i of impact to i s s c a Guidelines s present, this column must identify e e a m m s p r r

be p f f e MNES u general / specific mitigation u m o o s s s I m

reassessed I s a a f

Name NOTE - the n measures that can be implemented n f A e e o o o

based on o i i l t

t t

significant m to address that risk. m a n e a a

r mitigation e c c c e impact for i i l l n n measure(s) m p p a s each MNES e (The mitigation measures must be p p c s i G f a a i must be developed in consultation with e s n s g

addressed i VicRoads while the report is in draft) A individually S

Measures proposed must be specific to the protection/mitigation of significant impacts to biodiversity.

Task 12 Identify Further Actions The provider shall identify and justify any further actions or investigations such as targeted species surveys etc. which may be required as part of obtaining project approval.

Task 13 Report Prepare a report covering the outputs from the tasks listed above and subject to any specific modifications required for this Assignment, it is expected that the report will have the following chapter headings:  Executive summary  Introduction/background  Methodology  Consultation  Results  Discussion  Legislation and Policy  Objective Based Evaluation Matrix (remove if not applicable)  Habitat hectare assessment  Mitigation measures  Conclusions  Recommendations  Glossary of terms  References  A copy of this Assignment brief as Appendix 1  A copy of the EnSym Test Clearing Proposal (modelled) Report  Other Appendices, as required Native vegetation mapping data is to be provided as an ESRI shapefile (VicGrid94) to VicRoads. The shapefile with attributes table shall meet with DELWP’s EnSym NVR GIS data standards. An accuracy of at least 1 m for the native vegetation mapping is required. It is also expected that the report will contain:  a Cover Page with the Project name, type of consultancy, author’s name and date  a Table of Contents with a list of maps, drawings, tables and appendices  footers on each page including the date and version number  numbering of all pages  text that is readable and not less than 10 point Arial, or approved equivalent  acknowledgements for persons and organisations that have contributed to the report. NOTE: The report produced for this Assignment shall comply with the Whole of Victorian Government (WoVG) Accessibility Standard. The Provider should ensure that Accessibility requirements are incorporated as documents are being written and not leave this as a separate task to be carried out when finalising documents. Further details are provided in the Deliverables section of this brief.

Task 14 Attendance at meetings

The Consultant shall attend the following meetings:

Meeting Location Duration Date 1 Onsite 3 hours Prior to commencing onsite assessment

1 VR Bendigo 1 hours Progress meeting as office agreed to by the Superintendent NB. This clause is not intended to refer to or include any meetings the Consultant may have with other stakeholders while undertaking the assignment.

1.1 This site meeting will be approximately three (3) hours in duration and will take place within seven (7) working days from the date of commencement of the contract. At this meeting, VicRoads will:

 discuss OH&S matters / requirements of Contract,  outline the scope of the proposed project works at each study area / site,  briefly inspect with the Consultant the proposed works activity on the Project section lengths; and  proposed footprint of works / area band of interest.

Task 15 Submissions review (Provisional)

Review up to 12 submissions (applicable to biodiversity) received during/after public exhibition of the PSA documentation and prepare appropriate responses, in consultation with VicRoads.

Task 16 Attendance at Panel/Committee Hearing (Provisional)

Preparation for and attendance at a Planning Panel under the Planning and Environment Act, and Advisory Committee under the Planning and Environment Act.  The Provider team must include an experienced witness, with a suitable level of experience who could present findings at a Planning Panel/ Advisory Committee. VicRoads must agree to the person proposed to take on this role and that person must be actively involved in the study;  Prepare a written submission (expert witness statement) and presentation on the Preliminary Biodiversity Investigation aspects of the project. The expert witness statement will also take account of all matters arising from any earlier Directions Hearing(s);  Submit the expert witness statement and presentation for review by VicRoads and its legal adviser and revise as agreed;  Attend the Planning Panel/ Advisory Committee Hearings as requested by VicRoads;  Provide a written and oral submission to the Planning Panel/ Advisory Committee on the project's Preliminary Biodiversity Investigation issues and impacts, the performance against Preliminary Biodiversity Investigation objectives and on the submissions received during and after the exhibition period;  Be prepared to respond objectively to cross-examination during the Panel/ Advisory Committee Hearing and to provide succinct answers to any questions from the Panel/ Advisory Committee members  Review the submissions on Preliminary Biodiversity Investigation matters that are made during the Panel/ Advisory Committee Hearing itself, and provide advice to VicRoads and its legal adviser on how a suitable response may be presented in VicRoads' closing statement.

NOTE: All written submissions and presentation material prepared by the Provider shall comply with the WoVG Accessibility Standard. Further details are provided in the Deliverables section of this brief.

3.4 Information to be Provided by VicRoads to the Provider

VicRoads will provide the following information to the Provider:  Copies of previous relevant reports, plans showing the proposed study area and alignment route(s), relevant VicRoads policies and strategies etc.  Advice of the other relevant specialist consultants and VicRoads will co-ordinate liaison with them as required  Concept Plans

3.5 Access to Properties

VicRoads may provide details of property owners, where available. VicRoads may also arrange access to private properties, or may inform the Provider where access is not available or of any known special requirements for access.

The Provider shall contact Bruno Spandonide of VicRoads Northern Region on 03 54345182 prior to arranging access to private property. Under no circumstances is the Provider to enter private property before contacting Bruno Spandonide.

Entry on public land or private property for the purpose of carrying out site inspections is only permitted after the Provider has contacted and received permission from the appropriate authorities or landowners. The Provider must provide reasonable advance notice to the authority, or landowner before entering public land or private property.

3.6 Deliverables

3.6.1 Report

Accessibility

VicRoads has adopted the Whole of Victorian Government (WoVG) Accessibility Standard which is based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. This Standard aims to ensure that information on the VicRoads website will be available to all people without discrimination on the basis of disability and to make finding, using and interacting with the website easier. The Standard is available at: https://www.vic.gov.au/digitalstandards/complete-list-of-how-to-guides.html

There are several standards to note but relevant is the information on Content development https://www.vic.gov.au/digitalstandards/design-build.html and Dealing with difficult document formats for attachments https://www.vic.gov.au/digitalstandards/design-build/make-content-accessible.html As the report produced for this Assignment could be made available for viewing via the VicRoads website, it needs to be prepared to comply with the WoVG Accessibility Standard which involves meeting all Level AA Success Criteria of WCAG 2.0. Further advice on how to meet the WoVG Accessibility Standard can be provided by the Superintendent, if required.

Timing and Format Step Timing Details 1. Provider to submit 2 weeks after award The proposed Table of Contents, together with proposed report of the contract descriptions of maps and figures proposed to be structure included in the report will be discussed and agreed with VicRoads before the draft report is prepared. 2. Provider to submit 7 weeks after award An electronic copy of the complete draft report is to draft report of the contract be provided to VicRoads in Microsoft Word format, along with electronic copies of all maps, drawings and photos in the format agreed with VicRoads in Step 1. If the draft report is incomplete or inappropriately structured, VicRoads may request the draft report to be revised before reviewing it. 3. VicRoads to review 1 weeks after receipt The Provider may be asked to consider making changes draft report of the complete draft to the report based on the reviewer’s comments before report the report is finalised. Where the Provider has concerns about any of the review comments, these are to be discussed with VicRoads Superintendent’s Representative prior to finalisation of the report. 4. Provider to submit No more than 2 Electronic copies of the complete final report are to final report weeks after receipt of be provided to VicRoads in both a secured and VicRoads comments unsecured Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) on the draft report format and in Microsoft Word format. A digital copy of all maps, drawings and figures to be provided separately in formats agreed with VicRoads. 5. VicRoads The final report will only be accepted after all acceptance of final changes requested by VicRoads in Step 3 and report agreed by the Provider, have been completed.

Maps and Drawings The report should include maps and drawings showing [vegetation mapping, ecological vegetation classes, significant flora and fauna, e.g, . the study area and alignment options]. The source of all maps and drawings used in the report needs to be quoted, unless they have been prepared using data collected specifically for this Assignment. Maps need to be prepared to an appropriate scale so that information is clearly legible. Font sizes should be large enough to be able to read legends and text e.g. road names, when produced in A4. The Provider shall ensure that roads, features etc. referred to in the report are shown clearly on the relevant maps and drawings. The Provider shall ensure that maps and drawings comply with the DTPLI Communicating Data with Colour Guidelines.

Format of Electronic Mapping GIS data should be provided in an ESRI Shape file format. Individual ESRI shape files are to be provided for each separate major feature collection type as directed by the superintendent. The project coordinate system must be GDA94 Zone 54 or 55 as appropriate to at least an accuracy of 1m, or another similar standard agreed with VicRoads prior to the contract being awarded. Native vegetation mapping data is to be provided as an ESRI shapefile (VicGrid94) to VicRoads. The shapefile with attributes table shall meet with DELWP’s EnSym NVR GIS data standards. An accuracy of at least 1 m for the native vegetation mapping is required. 3.7 Key Project Personnel The Provider must nominate key project personnel in Schedule 28. The key roles to be nominated include:

 Project Manager – The role of the Project Manager is to ensure that the project is completed in a timely and efficient manner. The Project Manager is expected to be the day to day contact between VicRoads and the Provider.  Field Manager – The role of the Field Manager is to ensure all field works are undertaken in an appropriate manner and comply with relevant guidelines and legislation. This role may also be completed by the Project Manager.  Project Director – The role of the Project Director is to ensure that objectives of the project are being achieved in a timely and effective manner.

If the Provider intends to change any nominated key project personnel during the course of the contract, the Provider shall only do so with the prior agreement of the Superintendent

APPENDIX 2 - FLORA

Appendix 2.1 – Flora Results

Legend: * Listed as a noxious weed under the CaLP Act; w Weed of National Significance; P Protected under the FFG Act; and,

- Not applicable

Table A3.1. Flora recorded within the study area

Scientific Name Common Name Listed Weed INDIGENOUS SPECIES Acacia acinacea s.l. Gold-dust Wattle P Acacia dealbata Silver Wattle - Acacia mearnsii Black Wattle P Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood - Acacia paradoxa Hedge Wattle - Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle P Acaena novae-zelandiae Bidgee-widgee - Austrostipa spp. Spear Grass - Banksia marginata Silver Banksia - Cut-leaf Daisy P Bursaria spinosa Sweet Bursaria - Carex appressa Tall Sedge - Convolvulus angustissimus Blushing Bindweed - Dianella revoluta s.l. Black-anther Flax-lily - Eleocharis acuta Common Spike-sedge - Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red-gum - Eucalyptus globulus subsp. bicostata Eurabbie - Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum - Gahnia sieberiana Red- Saw-sedge - Goodenia ovata Hop Goodenia - Indigofera australis Austral Indigo - Juncus spp. Rush - Leptospermum lanigerum Woolly Tea-tree - Malva aff. preissiana (pink-flowered inland form) Australian Hollyhock -

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 78

Scientific Name Common Name Listed Weed Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark - Puccinellia stricta s.l. Australian Saltmarsh-grass - Rumex brownii Slender Dock - Senecio hispidulus s.l. Rough Fireweed - Senecio microbasis Slender Fireweed P Senecio quadridentatus Cotton Fireweed P NON-INDIGENOUS OR INTRODUCED SPECIES Aira spp. Hair Grass - Alisma lanceolatum Water Plantain - Allium triquetrum Angled Onion - Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet Vernal-grass - Arctotheca calendula Cape weed - Avena fatua Wild Oat - Brassica rapa White Turnip - Bromus catharticus Prairie Grass - Bromus hordeaceus subsp. hordeaceus Soft Brome - Chamaecyparis funebris Funeral Cypress - Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle * Conyza sumatrensis var. sumatrensis Tall Fleabane - Corymbia citriodora subsp. citriodora Lemon-scented Gum - Corymbia maculata Spotted Gum - Cotula coronopifolia Water Buttons - Crataegus monogyna Hawthorn * Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress - Cynara cardunculus subsp. flavescens Artichoke Thistle * Cyperus eragrostis Drain Flat-sedge - Dactylis glomerata Cocksfoot - Echium candicans Pride of Madeira - Echium plantagineum Paterson's Curse * Ehrharta calycina Perennial Veldt-grass - Eragrostis curvula African Love-grass * Eucalyptus botryoides Southern Mahogany - Eucalyptus cladocalyx Sugar Gum - Eucalyptus leptophylla Slender-leaf Mallee - Eucalyptus neglecta Omeo Gum - Eucalyptus ssp. Eucalypt sp. - Fraxinus angustifolia Desert Ash - Fraxinus excelsior English Ash -

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 79

Scientific Name Common Name Listed Weed Fumaria bastardii Bastard's Fumitory - Galenia pubescens var. pubescens Galenia - Galium aparine Cleavers - Genista monspessulana Montpellier Broom * W Geranium molle Dove's Foot - Grevillea robusta Silky Oak - Hakea sericea s.s. Silky Hakea - Helminthotheca echioides Ox-tongue - Holcus lanatus Yorkshire Fog - Hypochaeris radicata Flatweed - Kennedia nigricans Black Kennedia - Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce - Lepidium africanum Common Peppercress - Lolium perenne Perennial Rye-grass - Malus pumila Apple - Medicago polymorpha Burr Medic - Melaleuca acuminata subsp. acuminata Creamy Honey-myrtle - Melaleuca hypericifolia Hillock Bush - Melaleuca incana subsp. incana Grey Honey-myrtle - Modiola caroliniana Red-flower Mallow - Myosotis arvensis Field Forget-me-not - Nassella trichotoma Serrated Tussock * W Oxalis articulata Sourgrass - Parentucellia latifolia Red Bartsia - Paspalum dilatatum Paspalum - Persicaria capitata Pink-head Knotweed - Phalaris aquatica Toowoomba Canary-grass - Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine - Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum - Plantago coronopus Buck's-horn Plantain - Plantago lanceolata Ribwort - Poa annua Annual Meadow-grass - Polygala myrtifolia Myrtle-leaf Milkwort - Quercus canariensis Algerian Oak - Quercus robur English Oak - Quercus suber Cork Oak - Ranunculus repens Creeping Buttercup - Romulea rosea var. australis s.s. Common Onion-grass -

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 80

Scientific Name Common Name Listed Weed Rorippa nasturium-aquaticum Watercress - Rosa rubiginosa Sweet Briar * Rubus fruticosus spp. agg. Blackberry * W Salix fragilis Crack Willow W Senecio mandraliscae Blue Chalksticks - Sonchus oleraceus Common Sow-thistle - Spergularia rubra s.s. Red Sand-spurrey - Sporobolus africanus Rat-tail Grass - Stellaria media Chickweed - Tragopogon porrifolius subsp. porrifolius Salsify - Trifolium campestre var. campestre Hop Clover - Trifolium repens var. repens White Clover - Typha latifolia Lesser Reed-mace - Ulex europaeus Gorse * W Vicia sativa Common Vetch -

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 12/02/2020 81

Appendix 2.2 – Significant Flora Species

Table A2.2 Significant flora recorded within 10 kilometres of the study area Likelihood: Habitat characteristics of significant flora species previously recorded within 10 kilometres of the study area, or that may potentially occur within the study area were assessed to determine their likelihood of occurrence. The likelihood of occurrence rankings are defined below. 1 - Known occurrence 3 - Moderate Likelihood 5 – Unlikely - Recorded within the study area recently (i.e. within ten - Limited previous records of the species in the local vicinity; - No suitable habitat and/or outside the species range. years) and/or, - The study area contains poor or limited habitat. 2 - High Likelihood 4 - Low Likelihood - Previous records of the species in the local vicinity; and/or, - Poor or limited habitat for the species however other - The study area contains areas of high quality habitat. evidence (such as a lack of records or environmental factors) indicates there is a very low likelihood of presence.

Total # of Last Likely Scientific name Common name documented documented EPBC FFG DEPI occurrence in records record study area NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Amphibromus fluitans # River Swamp Wallaby-grass - - VU - - 4 Dianella amoena Matted Flax-lily 43 2015 EN L e 3 Dodonaea procumbens # Trailing Hop-bush - - VU - v 4 Glycine latrobeana # Clover Glycine - - VU L v 4 Lachnagrostis adamsonii Adamson's Blown-grass 1 1990 EN L v 4 Lepidium hyssopifolium s.s. Basalt Peppercress 7 2010 EN L e 4 Leucochrysum albicans var. tricolor # Hoary Sunray - - EN - e 4 Pimelea spinescens subsp.spinescens # Spiny Rice-flower - - CR L e 4 Pomaderris vacciniifolia # Round-leaf Pomaderris - - CR L e 4

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 82

Total # of Last Likely Scientific name Common name documented documented EPBC FFG DEPI occurrence in records record study area Prasophyllum frenchii # Maroon Leek-orchid - - EN L e 4 Prasophyllum validum # Sturdy Leek-orchid - - VU - - 5 Pterostylis chlorogramma # Green-striped Greenhood - - VU L v 5 Rutidosis leptorhynchoides # Button Wrinklewort - - EN L e 5 Senecio psilocarpus Swamp Fireweed 21 2002 VU - v 4 Thelymitra matthewsii # Spiral Sun-orchid - - VU L v 4 Xerochrysum palustre Swamp Everlasting 70 2014 VU L v 4 STATE SIGNIFICANCE Acacia leprosa var. uninervia Large-leaf Cinnamon-wattle 6 2011 - - r 4 Acacia nanodealbata Dwarf Silver-wattle 1 1988 - - r 4 Acacia uncifolia Coast Wirilda 1 2006 - - r 4 Amphibromus pithogastrus Plump Swamp Wallaby-grass 1 1992 - L e 4 Austrostipa rudis subsp. australis Veined Spear-grass 1 1974 - - r 4 Callitriche umbonata Winged Water-starwort 1 1992 - X r 4 Cardamine tenuifolia Slender Bitter-cress 1 1988 - - P 4 Carex tasmanica Curly Sedge 2 2005 - L v 4 Convolvulus angustissimus subsp. Slender Bindweed 5 2015 - - k 3 omnigracilis Coronidium gunnianum Pale Swamp Everlasting 38 2014 - - v 3 Cullen parvum Small Scurf-pea 2 2011 - L e 4 Cullen tenax Tough Scurf-pea 12 2015 - L e 3 Desmodium varians Slender Tick-trefoil 33 2015 - - k 3 Eucalyptus leucoxylon subsp. connata Melbourne Yellow-gum 2 2016 - X v 4

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 83

Total # of Last Likely Scientific name Common name documented documented EPBC FFG DEPI occurrence in records record study area Geranium solanderi var. solanderi s.s. Austral Crane's-bill 1 2008 - - v 4 Grevillea rosmarinifolia Rosemary Grevillea 1 2015 - - P 4 Lachnagrostis punicea subsp. punicea Purple Blown-grass 1 2015 - - r 4 Microseris scapigera s.s. Plains Yam-daisy 9 2010 - - v 4 Pauridia vaginata var. brevistigmata Yellow Star 2 2016 - - k 4 Pleurosorus subglandulosus Glandular Blanket-fern 1 1853 - - k 4 Poa labillardierei var. (Volcanic Plains) Basalt Tussock-grass 6 2015 - - k 4 Prasophyllum pyriforme s.s. Silurian Leek-orchid 3 1983 - - e 5 Rytidosperma monticola Small-flower Wallaby-grass 4 2005 - - r 3 Senecio campylocarpus Floodplain Fireweed 1 1993 - - r 4 Notes: EPBC = Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), FFG = Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act), DEPI= Advisory List of Rare or Threatened Plants in Victoria (DEPI 2014), L = Listed, # = Records identified from EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool, Data source: Victorian Biodiversity Atlas (DELWP 2018c); Protected Matters Search Tool (DoEE 2018). Order: Alphabetical.

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 84

APPENDIX 3 - FAUNA

Appendix 3.1 – Significant Fauna Species

Likelihood: Habitat characteristics of significant fauna species previously recorded within 10 kilometres of the study area, or that may potentially occur within the study area were assessed to determine their likelihood of occurrence. The likelihood of occurrence rankings are defined below. • Known resident in the study area based on site observations, database records, or expert advice; and/or, - 1 High Likelihood • Recent records (i.e. within five years) of the species in the local area (DELWP 2017d); and/or, • The study area contains the species’ preferred habitat. • The species is likely to visit the study area regularly (i.e. at least seasonally); and/or, 2 Moderate Likelihood • Previous records of the species in the local area (DELWP 2017d); and/or, • The study area contains some characteristics of the species’ preferred habitat. • The species is likely to visit the study area occasionally or opportunistically whilst en route to more suitable sites; and/or, 3 Low Likelihood • There are only limited or historical records of the species in the local area (i.e. more than 20 years old); and/or, • The study area contains few or no characteristics of the species’ preferred habitat. • No previous records of the species in the local area; and/or, • The species may fly over the study area when moving between areas of more suitable habitat; and/or, 4 Unlikely • Out of the species’ range; and/or, • No suitable habitat present.

EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) FFG Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG Act) DSE Advisory List of Threatened Vertebrate Fauna in Victoria (DSE 2013); Advisory List of Threatened Invertebrate Fauna in Victoria (DSE 2009b) NAP National Action Plan (Cogger et al 1993; Duncan et al. 1999; Garnet et al 2011; Woinarski et al 2014; Sands and New 2002; Tyler 1997)

EX Extinct DD Data deficient (insufficiently or poorly known RX Regionally extinct L Listed as threatened under FFG Act CR Critically endangered EN Endangered # Listed on the Protected Matters Search Tool NT Near threatened VU Vulnerable CD Conservation dependent LC least concern RA Rare

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 85

Table A3.1. Significant fauna within 10 kilometres of the study area.

Last Documented # Records EPBC FFG DSE Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood Record (VBA) (VBA) Act ACT (2013) NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Anthochaera phrygia Regent Honeyeater 1971 1 CR L CR 4 Botaurus poiciloptilus Australasian Bittern 1990 1 EN L EN 4 Dasyurus viverrinus # Eastern Quoll - 1 EN L RX 4 Delma impar Striped Legless Lizard 1991 1 VU L EN 4 Grantiella picta Painted Honeyeater 1988 1 VU L VU 4 Gymnobelideus leadbeateri Leadbeater's Possum 2017 1 CR L EN 4 Isoodon obesulus obesulus # Southern Brown Bandicoot - 1 EN L NT 4 Lathamus discolor Swift Parrot 1991 3 CR L EN 3 Litoria raniformis Growling Grass Frog 2010 39 VU L EN 2 Maccullochella peelii Murray Cod 1970 1 VU L VU 4 Macquaria australasica Macquarie Perch 1970 1 EN L EN 4 Pedionomus torquatus Plains-wanderer 1980 3 CR L CR 4 Synemon plana Golden Sun Moth 2017 72 CR L CR 2 Tympanocryptis pinguicolla Grassland Earless Dragon 1988 1 EN L CR 4 STATE SIGNIFICANCE Anas rhynchotis Australasian Shoveler 1979 5 - - VU 4 Ardea modesta Eastern Great Egret 1989 10 - L VU 3 Aythya australis Hardhead 2002 9 - - VU 3 Bidyanus bidyanus Silver Perch 1981 1 - L VU 4 Biziura lobata Musk Duck 2002 4 - - VU 3 Chthonicola sagittatus Speckled Warbler 1991 15 - L VU 3 Climacteris picumnus victoriae Brown Treecreeper (south-eastern ssp.) 1999 11 - - NT 3

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 86

Last Documented # Records EPBC FFG DSE Scientific Name Common Name Likelihood Record (VBA) (VBA) Act ACT (2013) Falco subniger Black Falcon 2007 3 - - VU 4 Hirundapus caudacutus White-throated Needletail 1995 9 - - VU 4 Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern 1979 1 - L NT 4 Lewinia pectoralis pectoralis Lewin's Rail 1968 1 - L VU 4 Melanodryas cucullata cucullata Hooded Robin 1990 3 - L NT 4 Ninox connivens connivens Barking Owl 1990 3 - L EN 4 Phascogale tapoatafa Brush-tailed Phascogale 2016 7 - L VU 4 Pseudemoia pagenstecheri Tussock Skink 2016 17 - - VU 3 Pseudophryne bibronii Brown Toadlet 2005 191 - L EN 2 Pseudophryne semimarmorata Southern Toadlet 1990 108 - - VU 2 Rhinolophus megaphyllus megaphyllus Eastern Horseshoe Bat 1988 1 - L VU 4 Sminthopsis murina murina Common Dunnart 1990 2 - - VU 4 Stagonopleura guttata Diamond Firetail 1989 5 - L NT 4 Turnix pyrrhothorax Red-chested Button-quail 1990 2 - L VU 4 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Chrysococcyx osculans Black-eared Cuckoo 1988 4 - - NT 3 Cinclosoma punctatum Spotted Quail-thrush 1990 3 - - NT 3 Circus assimilis Spotted Harrier 1999 3 - - NT 3 Gallinago hardwickii Latham's Snipe 1991 10 - - NT 3 Macquaria ambigua Golden Perch 1981 2 - - NT 3 Phalacrocorax varius Pied Cormorant 1977 2 - - NT 4 Platalea regia Royal Spoonbill 1990 5 - - NT 4 Sminthopsis crassicaudata Fat-tailed Dunnart 1991 2 - - NT 4 Turnix velox Little Button-quail 1991 1 - - NT 4

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 87

APPENDIX 4. OFFSET ESTIMATION

Appendix 4.1 – Native Vegetation Removal (NVR) Report

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 88 Native vegetation removal report

This report provides information to support an application to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation in accordance with the Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation. The report is not an assessment by DELWP of the proposed native vegetation removal. Native vegetation information and offset requirements have been determined using spatial data provided by the applicant or their consultant.

Date of issue: 20/03/2019 Report ID: EHP_2019_076 Time of issue: 1:41 pm

Project ID EHP11416_Wallan

Assessment pathway

Assessment pathway Basic Assessment Pathway

Extent including past and proposed 0.120 ha

Extent of past removal 0.000 ha

Extent of proposed removal 0.120 ha

No. Large trees proposed to be removed 0

Location category of proposed removal Location 1 The native vegetation is not in an area mapped as an endangered Ecological Vegetation Class (as per the statewide EVC map), sensitive wetland or coastal area. Removal of less than 0.5 hectares in this location will not have a significant impact on any habitat for a rare or threatened species

1. Location map

Page 1 Native vegetation removal report

Offset requirements if a permit is granted

Any approval granted will include a condition to obtain an offset that meets the following requirements:

General offset amount1 0.033 general habitat units

Vicinity Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority (CMA) or Mitchell Shire Council Minimum strategic biodiversity value 0.096 score2 Large trees 0 large trees

NB: values within tables in this document may not add to the totals shown above due to rounding Appendix 1 includes information about the native vegetation to be removed Appendix 2 includes information about the rare or threatened species mapped at the site. Appendix 3 includes maps showing native vegetation to be removed and extracts of relevant species habitat importance maps

1 The general offset amount required is the sum of all general habitat units in Appendix 1.

2 Minimum strategic biodiversity score is 80 per cent of the weighted average score across habitat zones where a general offset is required

Page 2 Native vegetation removal report

Next steps

Any proposal to remove native vegetation must meet the application requirements of the Basic Assessment Pathway and it will be assessed under the Basic Assessment Pathway.

If you wish to remove the mapped native vegetation you are required to apply for a permit from your local council. Council will refer your application to DELWP for assessment, as required. This report is not a referral assessment by DELWP.

This Native vegetation removal report must be submitted with your application for a permit to remove, destroy or lop native vegetation.

Refer to the Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (the Guidelines) for a full list of application requirements This report provides information that meets the following application requirements: ' The assessment pathway and reason for the assessment pathway ' A description of the native vegetation to be removed (met unless you wish to include a site assessment) ' Maps showing the native vegetation and property ' The offset requirements determined in accordance with section 5 of the Guidelines that apply if approval is granted to remove native vegetation.

Additional application requirements must be met including: ' Topographical and land information ' Recent dated photographs ' Details of past native vegetation removal ' An avoid and minimise statement ' A copy of any Property Vegetation Plan that applies ' A defendable space statement as applicable ' A statement about the Native Vegetation Precinct Plan as applicable ' An offset statement that explains that an offset has been identified and how it will be secured.

© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Disclaimer Melbourne 2019 This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any any information in this publication. images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water Obtaining this publication does not guarantee that an application will meet the and Planning logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit requirements of Clauses 52.16 or 52.17 of the Victoria Planning Provisions and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/34.0/au/deed.en Victorian planning schemes or that a permit to remove native vegetation will be granted. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. Notwithstanding anything else contained in this publication, you must ensure that For more information contact the DELWP Customer Service Centre 136 186 you comply with all relevant laws, legislation, awards or orders and that you obtain and comply with all permits, approvals and the like that affect, are applicable or are necessary to undertake any action to remove, lop or destroy or otherwise deal with any native vegetation or that apply to matters within the scope of Clauses 52.16 or 52.17 of the Victoria Planning Provisions and Victorian planning schemes. www.delwp.vic.gov.au

Page 3 Appendix 1: Description of native vegetation to be removed

All zones require a general offset, the general habitat units each zone is calculated by the following equation in accordance with the Guidelines: General habitat units = extent x condition x general landscape factor x 1.5, where the general landscape factor = 0.5 + (strategic biodiversity value score/2) The general offset amount required is the sum of all general habitat units per zone.

Native vegetation to be removed

Information provided by or on behalf of the applicant in a GIS file Information calculated by EnSym

BioEVC Extent Large Partial Condition Polygon SBV HI Zone Type BioEVC conservation without Habitat Offset type tree(s) removal score Extent score score status overlap units

1-a Patch cvu_0023 Depleted 0 no 0.330 0.085 0.085 0.120 0.023 General

1-b Patch cvu_0023 Depleted 0 no 0.330 0.016 0.016 0.120 0.005 General

1-c Patch cvu_0023 Depleted 0 no 0.330 0.001 0.001 0.120 0.000 General

1-d Patch cvu_0023 Depleted 0 no 0.330 0.019 0.019 0.120 0.005 General

Page 4 Appendix 2: Information about impacts to [K[O X[ ]R[OK]OWON \YOMSO\f RKLS]K]\ XW \S]O

This is not applicable in the Basic Assessment Pathway.

Page 5 Appendix 3 e Images of mapped native vegetation 2. Strategic biodiversity values map

3. Aerial photograph showing mapped native vegetation

Page 6 4. Map of the property in context

Yellow boundaries denote areas of proposed native vegetation removal.

Page 7

Appendix 4.2 – Habitat Compensation Obligations for the study area within the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy

Biodiversity Assessment: Wallan Area Network Improvements, Wallan, Victoria. Final Report: 29/04/2019 96

Habitat Compensation Obligations Statement

Statement of obligations under the Melbourne Strategic Assessment Date of issue: 12 November 2019

The Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) administers the Melbourne Strategic Assessment (MSA) program under Part 10 approvals of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). The MSA program has effect until 31 December 2060 and is subject to conditions specified in Annexure 2 for the 2010 approval, and Annexure 1 for the 2013 and 2014 approvals. This HCO Statement summarises the habitat compensation obligations for the specified infrastructure that are to be met prior to commencement of construction.

Project Details

Project Name MS01-HC-00695 Wallan Area Network Improvements

Project Location Northern Highway, Wallan

Data Source Data submitted to DELWP on 7 November 20109 by Catherine Stephenson

Local Government Area Mitchell Shire Council

Precinct Wallan South and Wallan East

Proponent Details

Organisation Regional Roads Victoria

Contact C/o Catherine Stephenson, Ecology and Heritage Partners

Email [email protected]

Address 292 Mount Alexander Road Ascot Vale Victoria 3032

Habitat Compensation Obligations Summary of habitat compensation obligations and status

Habitat Type Obligation Status

Golden Sun Moth 1.997 ha Obligations not met

Growling Grass Frog 2.115 ha Obligations not met

To determine the habitat compensation fees, multiply the habitat compensation obligation shown for each fee type by its unit cost listed at https://www.msa.vic.gov.au/regulatory-requirements/habitat-compensation. Note, GST is applicable. Please only request invoices to meet the habitat compensation obligations when you are certain that this will be paid. The MSA program wishes to advise that the landowner is responsible for ensuring that any other applicable Commonwealth, State and Local government legislation, regulation and operational policy is satisfied prior to subdivision, building and/or works commencing.

Actions that are either outside the MSA Program area, or not associated with urban development inside the MSA Program area, are subject to Victoria's native vegetation removal regulations under Clause 52.16/52.17 of the Planning Scheme and may also trigger the requirements for a referral under Part 7 of the EPBC Act.

© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/