William Mitchell Opinion - Volume 12, No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Mitchell Hamline School of Law Mitchell Hamline Open Access The Opinion 10-1969 William Mitchell Opinion - Volume 12, No. 1, October 1969 William Mitchell College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion Recommended Citation William Mitchell College of Law, "William Mitchell Opinion - Volume 12, No. 1, October 1969" (1969). The Opinion. 20. https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/20 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Opinion by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE OF LAW D Volume 12 St. Paul, Minnesota, October, 1969 No. l Burger Era Begins By Roger A. Christianson Seldom in American history has a 1931 with the LL.B. magna cum Eighth Circuit and a member of the man been given the opportunity to laude. Immediately upon graduation school's Board of Trustees, read in affect the lives of all his countrymen he became associated with the law part: and those of future generations. The firm of Boyesen, Otis and Faricy. "He has stool for integrity in pro­ power of the Supreme Court, good Justice Burger eventually became a fession, for vigor in advocacy, for or evil, can scarcely be underesti­ partner in that firm which was later responsibility in government, for mated. If it cannot shape the destiny to become known as Faricy, Burger, progressive change, and for the recog­ of our country, it unquestionably Moore and Costello. He practiced nition and the resolution of human can exert an enormous influence law in St. Paul until 1953 when he problems." in that direction. was named an Assistant Attorney In 1955 as Justice Burger was about Thus, it was with great pride that General of the United States. During to leave his position with the At­ William Mitchell College of Law his two years with the Attorney Gen­ torney General's office and return to greeted the nomination and installa­ eral's office he distinguished himself the pras:tice of law in Minnesota he tion of Warren E. Burger as 15th as chief of that office's civil division. was nominated by President Eisen­ Chief Justice of the United States. Soon after his graduation from law h0wer to fill a vacancy on the United The nomination not only repre­ school Justice Burger joined his law States Court of Appeals for the Dis­ sented the additional contribution of partner, James C. Otis, as a member trict of Columbia. Since that date the state of Minnesota to a position of his alma mater's part-time faculty. he has served as a distinguished of national leadership, but also was He taught courses in contracts and member of that Court which deals a great victory for the night law trusts and later became a member with so much controversial and diffi­ student. There never before has been of the law school corporation. He cult litigation. a night law student present on continued to teach and to serve as a Throughout his career the new the Supreme Court. corporation member until leaving for Chief Justice has been interested in Chief Justice Burger's appoint­ Washington upon his appointment legal education and in the improve­ ment bears special significance in as Assistant Attorney General. ment of the profession. His article, a period of important social and During his years of practice and A Sick Profession, 27 Fed. Bar J. 228 economic change. The new Chief teaching in St. Paul, Justice Burger (1967), attests to his interest in the Justice when appearing before the was active in Bar Association work training of the trial bar and his con­ Senate Judiciary Committee re­ and civic affairs. Years later he was cern for its prestige. He has given frained from espousing any fixed to give this advice to his law school's generously of his time to Phi Alpha doctrines and since his appointment graduating seniors: Delta Law Fraternity's Inns of Court has carefully avoided obvious attempts "It makes little difference which program, a program designed to pro­ by national writers to label his politi­ political party you decide best ex­ duce interest and competence in ad­ cal philosophy. His efforts are most presses your point of view. A politi­ vocacy among law students. He appreciated in avoiding· any erosion cal party is merely a tool, a means served as chairman of one of the sub­ in the politics of hope and individual to an end. But identify yourself committees of the American Bar rights. Those who attempt to label with one of them. Never be afraid of Association's Committee on Minimum Burger at this point are making a any local, state or national area - Standards of Criminal Justice and, Warren E. Burger posed in judicial robes shortly before he was great mistake based on the views of never, never be afraid to take sides when Judge J. Edward Lumbard 11 sworn in as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. those that know him best. no matter how controversial the occa­ stepped down as chairman of the Born in St. Paul in 1907 Justice sion or the problem may be." entire committee Justice Burger suc­ Burger lived his early life on that In 1955 and again in 1964 Justice ceeded him. city's east side where he attended Burger delivered commencement ad­ His associates in the local bar re­ public high school while carrying dresses at his alma mater. He has member him as a fair yet vigorous newspapers and working at various continued to take an active interest advocate and he enjoys their highest other part-time jobs. Following his in his law school and is numbered esteem and respect. There has been graduation from high school he at­ among its most generous and loyal and will continue to be great specu­ SBA Election Results tended the University of Minnesota supporters. In 1964 William Mitchell lation over the course that the court for two years and then entered night Coilege of Law bestowed upon Jus­ may take under his guidance; as to At the first summer meeting of the WM Board of Governors, Steve law school at what was known as the tice Burger the highest honor it can this, only time will tell. However, Wheeler, Senior, was elected as the President of the Student Bar Associa­ St. Paul College of Law. As do most give: it conferred upon him the hon­ those who know Justice Burger are tion. Serving with him on the Executive Committee will be Roger Chris­ evening law school students, he orary degree of Doctor of Laws. confident that his leadership will be tianson, Vice-President, Dick Kavaney, Secretary, and Jim Lawton, Secretary. worked during the day while attend­ The citation, prepared by one of firm and that his decisions will be As a result of the class elections held last spring the composition of the ing classes at night. Justice Burger's oldest friends, Harry sound and these virtues are of the ut­ Board of Governors is as follows: Second Year - Bruce Armstrong, Jim Law­ Justice Burger was an outstanding A. Blackmun, Judge of the United most importance in these difficult ton, Ken Schivone, and John Colosimo; Third Year - Bruce Olander, Dave law student and was graduated in States Court of Appeals for the times. Watson, Ron Johnson, and Dick Kavaney_; Fourth Year - Steve Wheeler, Roger Christianson, Don Day, and Ben Brunsvold. The Board will be fur­ ther enlarged after the First Year elections in October. Over the summer months the SBA Board of Governors held several meet­ ings to map out plans for this year and to work on certain projects. This Last spring a proposal was made to column is intended to communicate actions taken by the Board and projects the Trustees for a professional person contemplated for later this year. to be hired to serve as an Alumni Publishing of Opinion Association director and Graduate The major task undertaken by the SBA this summer was the putting to­ Placement Service Coordinator. A gether of the first OPINION in over a year. Much of the work was done by response by the Board commended members of the Board, but a great deal of effort was contributed by other the suggestion but stated that funds interested students. The next edition of the paper is slated for late December were not available at this time for and any assistance by interested students would be enthusiastically accepted. such an undertaking. The deadline for copy will be November 10. This year students will be informed We wish to announce that the annual bus trip to the Stillwater Prison about w:here their $2 SBA fee goes. (complete with free beer) will be held in the fall instead of the spring. Ar­ The Treasurer is in the process of rangements are presently being worked out liy Ken Schivone and the exact compiling a Budget to be made dates and times will be publicized shortly. public. Negotiations are now underway with the North Star Insurance Agency for How many students would like their publication of the WM Student Directory. As contemplated the direc­ the opportunity to ride along in a tory will contain both home and business telephone numbers unless a stu­ squad car of the Minneapolis or dent expresses a desire to keep his business number private. St. Paul police departments? If a The Dean's suggestion that WM students again participate in the active substantial number respond favorably committees of the Minnesota State Bar Association has been warmly received there is a good chance that a pro­ by the Board.
Recommended publications
  • Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University Of

    Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University Of

    Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University of Texas at Austin 727 E. 26th St., Austin, Texas 78705-3224 512/471-7263 SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES, 1823-1955, Bulk 1860-1939 Inventory Date printed: SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES Inventory Extent: 1.25 linear ft. (3 boxes). Frank, John P., 1917-2002- John P. Frank, a noted attorney and constitutional scholar, was born in 1917. He received his LL.B. at the University of Wisconsin, and his J.S.D. from Yale University. He was law clerk to Justice Hugo L. Black at the October, 1942 term, among other prominent positions. He taught law from 1946 to 1954 at Indiana and Yale Universities. He has authored 12 books on the Supreme Court, the Constitution and constitutional law. A senior partner with the Phoenix firm of Lewis and Roca, which he joined in 1954, Frank was lead counsel on the ground-breaking Miranda v. Arizona case, and served as counsel to Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. While serving on the Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank led a group that worked on drafting revisions to Rule 11 attorney sanctions. Frank also served from 1960 to 1970 on the Advisory Committee of Civil Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Scope and Content: The collection consists of research into U.S. Supreme Court nominations of the 19th and 20th centuries, and includes 8 inches of printed materials and 7 microfilm reels (35mm), 1823-1939 (bulk 1860-1939), collected by Frank, for a research project concerning Supreme Court nominations.
  • Abington School District V. Schempp 1 Ableman V. Booth 1 Abortion 2

    Abington School District V. Schempp 1 Ableman V. Booth 1 Abortion 2

    TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Bill of Rights 66 Birth Control and Contraception 71 Abington School District v. Schempp 1 Hugo L. Black 73 Ableman v. Booth 1 Harry A. Blackmun 75 Abortion 2 John Blair, Jr. 77 Adamson v. California 8 Samuel Blatchford 78 Adarand Constructors v. Peña 8 Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 79 Adkins v. Children’s Hospital 10 Bob Jones University v. United States 80 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl 13 Boerne v. Flores 81 Advisory Opinions 15 Bolling v. Sharpe 81 Affirmative Action 15 Bond v. United States 82 Afroyim v. Rusk 21 Boumediene v. Bush 83 Age Discrimination 22 Bowers v. Hardwick 84 Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 24 Boyd v. United States 86 Allgeyer v. Louisiana 26 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale 86 Americans with Disabilities Act 27 Joseph P. Bradley 87 Antitrust Law 29 Bradwell v. Illinois 89 Appellate Jurisdiction 33 Louis D. Brandeis 90 Argersinger v. Hamlin 36 Brandenburg v. Ohio 92 Arizona v. United States 36 William J. Brennan, Jr. 92 Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing David J. Brewer 96 Development Corporation 37 Stephen G. Breyer 97 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 38 Briefs 99 Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 38 Bronson v. Kinzie 101 Assembly and Association, Freedom of 39 Henry B. Brown 101 Arizona v. Gant 42 Brown v. Board of Education 102 Atkins v. Virginia 43 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 104 Automobile Searches 45 Brown v. Maryland 106 Brown v. Mississippi 106 Bad Tendency Test 46 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 107 Bail 47 Buchanan v.
  • Supreme Court Justices

    Supreme Court Justices

    The Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices *asterick denotes chief justice John Jay* (1789-95) Robert C. Grier (1846-70) John Rutledge* (1790-91; 1795) Benjamin R. Curtis (1851-57) William Cushing (1790-1810) John A. Campbell (1853-61) James Wilson (1789-98) Nathan Clifford (1858-81) John Blair, Jr. (1790-96) Noah Haynes Swayne (1862-81) James Iredell (1790-99) Samuel F. Miller (1862-90) Thomas Johnson (1792-93) David Davis (1862-77) William Paterson (1793-1806) Stephen J. Field (1863-97) Samuel Chase (1796-1811) Salmon P. Chase* (1864-73) Olliver Ellsworth* (1796-1800) William Strong (1870-80) ___________________ ___________________ Bushrod Washington (1799-1829) Joseph P. Bradley (1870-92) Alfred Moore (1800-1804) Ward Hunt (1873-82) John Marshall* (1801-35) Morrison R. Waite* (1874-88) William Johnson (1804-34) John M. Harlan (1877-1911) Henry B. Livingston (1807-23) William B. Woods (1881-87) Thomas Todd (1807-26) Stanley Matthews (1881-89) Gabriel Duvall (1811-35) Horace Gray (1882-1902) Joseph Story (1812-45) Samuel Blatchford (1882-93) Smith Thompson (1823-43) Lucius Q.C. Lamar (1883-93) Robert Trimble (1826-28) Melville W. Fuller* (1888-1910) ___________________ ___________________ John McLean (1830-61) David J. Brewer (1890-1910) Henry Baldwin (1830-44) Henry B. Brown (1891-1906) James Moore Wayne (1835-67) George Shiras, Jr. (1892-1903) Roger B. Taney* (1836-64) Howell E. Jackson (1893-95) Philip P. Barbour (1836-41) Edward D. White* (1894-1921) John Catron (1837-65) Rufus W. Peckham (1896-1909) John McKinley (1838-52) Joseph McKenna (1898-1925) Peter Vivian Daniel (1842-60) Oliver W.
  • The Appointment of Hugo L. Black

    The Appointment of Hugo L. Black

    The University of Chicago Law Review VOLUME 41 NUMBER 1FALL 1973 A Klansman Joins the Court: The Appointment of Hugo L. Black William E. Leuchtenburgj I. THE NOMINATION On August 12, 1937, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, rebounding from the worst setback of his long Presidency, took the first of a series of steps toward creating what historians would one day call "the Roose- velt Court." Galling defeat had come less than a month before when the Senate had killed his scheme to add a Justice to the Supreme Court for every member aged seventy or over who did not resign or retire. The original plan would have allowed the President to name as many as six new Justices, but after a bitter 168-day fight, the measure was buried, amid loud rejoicing from FDR's opponents. Roosevelt was not finished yet, however, for one legacy of the protracted struggle was the creation of a vacancy on the Supreme Court, and it was the President's prerogative to nominate a successor. The choice he finally made would trigger an acrimonious controversy and would have a momentous im- pact on the disposition of the Court. The vacancy resulted, at least indirectly, from Roosevelt's "Court- packing" plan. The President had advanced his bold proposal in February because he was frustrated by the performance of the Supreme Court, particularly the conservative "Four Horsemen"--Willis Van t De Witt Clinton Professor of History, Columbia University. This article is an expanded version of a paper presented as the second annual William Winslow Crosskey Lecture in Legal History at The University of Chicago Law School on February 28, 1973.
  • Censorship and Journalists' Privilege

    Censorship and Journalists' Privilege

    From the Archives An occasional series spotlighting captivating and relevant scholarship from back issues of Minnesota History. “Censorship and Journalists’ Privilege” was an edited version of a talk given by journalist Fred Friendly at the 1978 annual meeting and history conference of the Minnesota Historical Society. It was published in the Winter 1978 issue. meantime restrained, and they are hereby forbidden to Censorship and produce, edit, publish, circulate, have in their possession, Journalists’ Privilege sell or give away any publication known by any other name whatsoever containing malicious, scandalous, and The Case of Near versus Minnesota— defamatory matter of the kind alleged in plaintiff’s com- A Half Century Later plaint herein or otherwise.”4 His order was upheld five months later when Chief Justice Samuel B. Wilson declared for the majority of the Fred W. Friendly Minnesota Supreme Court: “In Minnesota no agency can hush the sincere and honest voice of the press; but our Although journalists tend to give all credit to the Constitution was never intended to protect malice, scan- Founding Fathers for freedom of the press, it was the dal, and defamation, when untrue or published without creative work of this century’s judiciary— Charles Evans justifiable ends.” By way of comparison Justice Wilson Hughes, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis D. Brandeis, noted that the constitutional guarantee of freedom of among others— that nationalized the First Amendment. assembly does not protect illegal assemblies, such as For it was only forty- eight years ago, in its [1931] decision riots, nor does it deny the state power to prevent them.5 in Near v.
  • Willis Van Devanter - a Re-Examination

    Willis Van Devanter - a Re-Examination

    Wyoming Law Review Volume 1 Number 1 Article 11 January 2001 Willis Van Devanter - A Re-Examination Wallace H. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr Recommended Citation Johnson, Wallace H. (2001) "Willis Van Devanter - A Re-Examination," Wyoming Law Review: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol1/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wyoming Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Johnson: Willis Van Devanter - A Re-Examination WILLIS VAN DEVANTER-A "RE- EXAMINATION" Honorable Wallace H. Johnson About a year ago, Al Simpson, our host and Honorary Chairman of this event, Jerry Parkinson, Dean of Wyoming's College of Law, and I were discussing the Supreme Court of the United States, the Wyoming Bar, and "Frontier Justice." Senator Simpson called our attention to the fact that Willis Van Devanter was the only Wyoming citizen who has served as an Associate Justice of the Court. He "wondered" to us aloud why more recognition was not afforded Justice Van Devanter within Wyoming's Bench, Bar,and historical community. The Senator stimulated my interest since the Justice began his national public career as Assistant Attorney General for Public Lands (AAG-Lands), appointed by President McKinley in 1897 and serving in that office six years until 1903. While responsible to the Attorney Gen- eral of the United States, the position of AAG-Lands was then physically located in the Department of Interior, and the principal responsibility was to litigate on behalf of that Department concerning public lands and Native American issues.
  • The Supreme Court Opinion As Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court

    The Supreme Court Opinion As Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court

    The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court Robert Postt In 1921, when William Howard Taft became Chief Justice, the Supreme Court did not occupy the serene and imposing marble building that has since become its contemporary icon.1 Its courtroom was instead located in the old Senate Chamber, whose intimate, elegant surroundings echoed with the debates of Webster, Clay, and Calhoun.2 Its administrative staff and offices were scattered haphazardly and inefficiently throughout the Capitol.3 It was Taft who, with great skill and patience, t I am very grateful for the advice and insight of friends and colleagues. I would particularly like to thank Paul Carrington, Jesse Choper, Meir Dan- Cohen, Mel Eisenberg, Dan Farber, Phil Frickey, Barry Friedman, Howard Gillman, Jim Gordley, Morton Horowitz, Laura Kalman, Robert Kagan, Larry Kramer, David Lieberman, Sandy Levinson, David and Miranda McGowan, Paul Mishkin, William Nelson, Judith Resnik, Dan Rubinfeld, Reva Siegel, and Mark Tushnet. I am especially grateful for the stalwart and heroic efforts of Linda Lye, Cathy Shuck, and Sambhav Nott Sankar. Copyright 2001 by Robert Post. Many of the materials cited and quoted herein are archival and on file with the author. The Minnesota Law Review was thus unable to independ- ently verify this authority. Unless otherwise noted, figures are based on the independent research of the author or annual reports of the Attorney General of the United States. 1. Writing in 1984, Margaret P. Lord noted that to the Justices who first moved into the contemporary Supreme Court building in 1935, "the spaces were too huge, the corridors were too long and cold, the rooms too formal." Margaret P.
  • One of Nine--Mr. Justice Burton's Appointment to the Supreme Court

    One of Nine--Mr. Justice Burton's Appointment to the Supreme Court

    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 6 1953 One of Nine--Mr. Justice Burton's Appointment to the Supreme Court Daniel S. McHargue Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel S. McHargue, One of Nine--Mr. Justice Burton's Appointment to the Supreme Court, 4 W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 128 (1953) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol4/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. [Winter One of Nine - Mr. Justice Burton's Appointment to the Supreme Court Daniel S. McHargue IN TWO WAYS Associate Justice Harold Hitz Burton is one of nine. First, he is one of the nine Justices currently comprising the personnel of the Supreme Court of the United States and the only Republican member thereof. Second, he is one of the nine men appointed to or promoted on our nation's highest tribunal by Presidents belonging to a different political party and the only Republican placed upon that bench by a Democratic President. The nine tenures held by Justices whose partisan affiliation differed from that of the chief executive responsible for their selection comprise only about 10% of a total of some ninety-one Sn- ofeme nietyone Su- THE AuTHOR (A.B., 1938, M.A., 1941, Ph.D., 1949, University of California) is Assistant reme Court tenures.
  • The Human Resumes of Great Supreme Court Justices

    The Human Resumes of Great Supreme Court Justices

    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1991 The umH an Resumes of Great Supreme Court Justices David P. Bryden E. Christine Flaherty Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bryden, David P. and Flaherty, E. Christine, "The umH an Resumes of Great Supreme Court Justices" (1991). Minnesota Law Review. 1120. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1120 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The "Human Resumes" of Great Supreme Court Justices* David P. Bryden** and E. Christine Flaherty*** Compared to the bloody battle over Judge Robert Bork,' the nomination of Judge David Souter to serve on the Supreme Court generated little controversy. Yet in his own understated way, Souter also contributed to the perennial debate about the proper qualifications of Supreme Court nominees. Supporters usually emphasize the nominee's legal credentials. Somewhat less publicly, presidents, senators, and interested citizens have also studied the political balance sheet. From time to time questions have been raised about alleged lack of judicial tem- perament (Brandeis) 2 or ethical lapses (Haynsworth).3 The Souter nomination raised a different issue: Can a bachelor from a small town in New Hampshire be a good Supreme Court justice? More broadly, what kinds of experiences shape the character of the best justices? This question was obliquely raised by Justice Thurgood Marshall, who consented to be interviewed by a television jour- nalist about the Souter nomination.
  • Justice Sutherland Reconsidered Samuel R

    Justice Sutherland Reconsidered Samuel R

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 62 | Issue 2 Article 10 3-2009 Justice Sutherland Reconsidered Samuel R. Olken Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuel R. Olken, Justice Sutherland Reconsidered, 62 Vanderbilt Law Review 639 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol62/iss2/10 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Justice Sutherland Reconsidered Samuel R. Olken* IN TRO D U CTIO N ............................................................................... 639 I. SUTHERLAND AND THE PROBLEM OF REPUTATION .............. 642 II. THE CONSERVATIVE JUDICIAL TRADITION .......................... 653 III. THE CONSTITUTIONAL PHILOSOPHY OF G EORGE SUTHERLAND ......................................................... 660 A. Individual Liberty as the Cornerstoneof A m erican Dem ocracy ............................................... 660 B. FactionalAversion and the Equal Operation of th e L a w ................................................................ 663 C. Constitutional Conservatism and JudicialR eview ....................................................... 665 IV. ECONOMIC LIBERTY AND FACTIONAL AVERSION ................. 667 A . Liberty of Contract..................................................
  • 1939 Journal

    1939 Journal

    — — I OCTOBEE TEEM, 1939 STATISTICS Original Appellate Total Number of cases on docket _ _ 15 1, 063 1, 078 Cases disposed of __ 4 942 946 Remaining on docket 11 121 132 Cases disposed of By written opinions 151 By per curiam opinions 97 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 690 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation 8 Number of written opinions 137 Number of admissions to bar 1,016 REFERENCE INDEX Page. Butler, J., death of, announced 73 Butler, J., resolutions of the Bar presented by Attorney Gen- eral Jackson 242 Murphy, J., commission read and oath taken (February 5, 1940) . 146 Eobert H. Jackson, Attorney General, presented his Commis- sion 126 Francis Biddle, Solicitor General, presented 126 Proceedings commemorating 150th Anniversary of Court (February 1, 1940) 136 Address of Attorney General Jackson 136 Address of Charles A. Beardsley, President of American Bar Association 139 Address of the Chief Justice 141 Advisory Committee requested to submit amendments to Eules of Civil Procedure 54 Administrative Office of United States Courts Henry P. Chandler appointed Director 75 Elmore Whitehurst appointed Assistant Director 54 Transfer of appropriations 54,221 Allotment of Justices 158 181208—40 98 — II Page. Disbarment, In the matter of Clyde H. Walker 34 Anna L. Cooke 34,81 David B. Getz 35,81 Walter C. Balderston 46 French B. Loveland (failure to reply to Clerk's communi- cations) 81, 109, 115 Rules of Supreme Court—Rule 41 amended 192 Regulations prescribed in reference to appeals from Court of Claims appearing in 210 U. S.
  • Inside the Taft Court: Lessons from the Docket Books, 2015 Sup

    Inside the Taft Court: Lessons from the Docket Books, 2015 Sup

    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2016 Inside the Taft ourC t: Lessons From the Docket Books Barry Cushman Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Courts Commons, First Amendment Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Barry Cushman, Inside the Taft Court: Lessons From the Docket Books, 2015 Sup. Ct. Rev. 345 (2016). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1243 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2016 Inside the Taft ourC t: Lessons From the Docket Books Barry Cushman Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Courts Commons, First Amendment Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Cushman, Barry, "Inside the Taft ourC t: Lessons From the Docket Books" (2016). Journal Articles. 1243. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1243 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship.