DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 1 Period of Investigation and Key Investigators ............................................................................ 1 FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION ................................................... 2 Project Description...................................................................................................................... 2 Alternative Sites .......................................................................................................................... 2 Environmental Assessment ......................................................................................................... 3 (1) Effects, destruction and/or displacement of wildlife and marine life, including endangered species, and their habitats, or food chain ............................................................. 3 (2) Destruction or disturbance of marshland or wetlands ....................................................... 4 (3) Displacement of households, businesses, or services ....................................................... 5 (4) Possible destruction of surrounding farm land or the loss of open space land ................. 5 (5) Effects on land having archeological significance ............................................................ 6 (6) Destruction or disturbance of areas of historical significance .......................................... 6 (7) Use of irretrievable resources ............................................................................................ 7 (8) Noise.................................................................................................................................. 8 (9) Traffic circulation and traffic pattern disruption ............................................................... 8 (10) Odor/air quality ............................................................................................................... 9 (11) Damage and/or pollution of surface water resulting from erosion, discharges or other sources..................................................................................................................................... 9 (12) Aesthetic concerns and visual impacts .......................................................................... 10 (13) Any disturbance to designated wild, scenic and/or recreational river use .................... 10 (14) Socio-economic changes ............................................................................................... 10 (15) Floodplain impacts ........................................................................................................ 11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 13 REFERENCES AND COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................. 14 SITE ASSESSMENT DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATIONS ...................................................... 19 ATTACHMENT 1. PROJECT DESIGN PLAN AND MAPS ATTACHMENT 2. PHOTOGRAPHS ATTACHMENT 3. AGENCY CONSULTATIONS AND DATABASES ATTACHMENT 4. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 5. QUALIFICATIONS Project Number SEA 18-4999.1 ii INTRODUCTION Stokes Environmental Associates, Ltd. was authorized by Mr. Christopher A. Taylor, PE, Env Sp of Johnson, Mirmiran, & Thompson, to prepare a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review in compliance with the requirements of the Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program, in accordance with the requirements of the NEPA. Objectives The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is the basic national charter for protection of the environment. Section 102(2) of NEPA requires federal agencies to act in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Act. Regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality, (40 CFR 1500) outline methods for evaluating compliance with the Act. Virginia Code sections 10.1-118 et seq. implement the applicable requirements of NEPA, for major state projects, and requires environmental investigation prior to constructing major projects. The Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program Design Manual provides details of the environmental investigation needed for projects receiving loan assistance under the program, in compliance with NEPA. The purpose of the following investigation is to provide the investigation required by the Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund program in compliance with the requirements of NEPA. Period of Investigation and Key Investigators Investigation of the site was performed during the period of 24 April 2018 through 20 July 2018 as Stokes Environmental Associates, Ltd. (SEA, Ltd.), Project SEA 18-4999.1. The following Environmental Professionals performed this investigation: Mr. T. Lane Stokes, III was the Project Manager for this National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Investigation. Mr. Thomas L. Stokes, Jr. assisted in research and analysis, and provided technical review of this report. Project Number SEA 18-4999.1 1 FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION Project Description The City of Norfolk new sanitary sewer pump station is proposed for funding by the Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program, to provide needed capacity in the service area in western Colonial Place in Norfolk, Virginia. The proposed site is located near the intersection of Llewellyn and 38th Street (see attached drawing). The pump station is to be constructed in the center of the northern half of a 0.3 acre, rectangular parcel of land owned by the City of Norfolk, consisting of a grass field surrounded by trees, just south of a stormwater pond. It is to include a raised platform at approximately 18 ft by 44 ft, with a 14 ft by 14 ft submersible pump house to be approximately 11 ft high and 6 ft deep into ground, and will include subsurface piping, reservoirs, and electric/utility connections. The landscaping is to be carried out by Norfolk Recreation, Parks, and Open Space (REPOS) staff, including planning and labor. Alternative Sites In order to meet the need for sanitary sewer capacity, minimal environmental impact, and optimal project feasibility, an analysis was conducted by Christopher A. Taylor, P. E., senior associate of Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc., which identified all potentially favorable alternative design options that would not result in displacement of private property or loss of essential public services. Further details on alternative site locations are included in the Appendix section of the report. The alternative sites included the following: Alternative A - Pump Station at Llewellyn Avenue & 38th Street (Proposed Site): This site is located within a grass field between Llewellyn Avenue and the building of former J. E. B. Elementary School (currently inactive). This option would occupy a small amount of space within the floodplain and negligible environmental impacts as described in this report. Alternative B - No Action: This option is a baseline which has no increased environmental impact. Compared to the other options, no land resources would be used. However, this alternative does not supply the needed capacity, which may have adverse effects on human health and the environment. Alternative C - Pump Station at Delaware Avenue and Llewellyn Avenue: This site is located in Colonial Place Greenway between a playground and Llewellyn Avenue. The environmental impacts of this option and their degree would be similar to the proposed option at Pump Station at Llewellyn Avenue and 38th Street. The site is within undeveloped floodplain area and would include some blocked view of open space, while the final landscaped pump station would improve the aesthetic quality of the open space area. The City of Norfolk mentioned concern regarding proximity of wetlands. The cost of this option is substantially higher, because this would require 1,160 feet of force main length (more than 7 times longer than the proposed site). The additional underground piping is undesirable for environmental reasons as well as the Project Number SEA 18-4999.1 2 incremental risk per increased linear foot of pipe. This alternative was not recommended based on cost and environmental concerns. Alternative D - Pump Station at the terminus of Maryland Avenue: This site is located on southeast corner of Virginia Avenue and Maryland Avenue. The site is within undeveloped floodplain area. The pump station would need to be exceedingly high in order to meet flood elevations, which would have substantial blocked view of open space and minor adverse unavoidable aesthetic impact on Colonial Place Greenway and residences. The City of Norfolk also expressed concern regarding the proximity to wetlands. Therefore this alternative was not recommended. Alternative E - Pump Station in Colonial Place Circle: This location is within a heavily landscaped traffic circle at the intersection of Delaware Avenue and Colonial Avenue. This option would include substantial blocked view of open space, unmitigatable adverse aesthetic impact, and damage to the critical root zone of old-growth canopy trees. This area is central to the view from heavily trafficked public rights-of-way. This option does not use undeveloped floodplain resources. (The absence of floodplain with this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Tidal Flooding on Estuarine Biogeochemistry: Quantifying Flood-Driven Nitrogen Inputs in an Urban, Lower Chesapeake Bay Sub-Tributary
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 8-2021 Effects of tidal flooding on estuarine biogeochemistry: Quantifying flood-driven nitrogen inputs in an urban, lower Chesapeake Bay sub-tributary Alfonso Macías-Tapia Margaret R. Mulholland Corday R. Selden Jon Derek Loftis Peter W. Bernhardt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Water Research 201 (2021) 117329 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Water Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres Effects of tidal flooding on estuarine biogeochemistry: Quantifying flood-driven nitrogen inputs in an urban, lower Chesapeake Bay sub-tributary Alfonso Macías-Tapia a,*, Margaret R. Mulholland a, Corday R. Selden a,1, J. Derek Loftis b, Peter W. Bernhardt a a Department of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA b Center for Coastal Resources Management, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Sea level rise has increased the frequency of tidal flooding even without accompanying precipitation in many Sea level rise coastal areas worldwide. As the tide rises, inundates the landscape, and then recedes, it can transport organic and Tidal flooding inorganic matter between terrestrial systems and adjacent aquatic environments. However, the chemical and Nitrogen loading biological effects of tidal flooding on urban estuarine systems remain poorly constrained. Here, we provide the Water quality firstextensive quantificationof floodwaternutrient concentrations during a tidal floodingevent and estimate the Enterococcus King tide nitrogen (N) loading to the Lafayette River, an urban tidal sub-tributary of the lower Chesapeake Bay (USA).
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunity Zone Prospectus
    NORFOLK ® OPPORTUNITY ZONE PROSPECTUS N O R F O L K V I R G I N I A - I N V E S T M E N T P R O S P E C T U S 1 WELCOME For more than 300 years, Norfolk has served as the cultural and economic heart of Hampton Roads, mixing ideas, connecting people, creating new experiences and new businesses, and powering the growth of a region that is home to 1.75 million people and a real GDP approaching $84 billion. One of America’s oldest global trade destinations, Norfolk has been transformed into a global center for international security and coastal resilience. We are home to Naval Station Norfolk, the world’s largest naval base, and NATO’s only headquarters in North America. We also serve as a national leader in health care, transportation, higher education, and visual and performing arts. Norfolk is investing in transformative projects that will enhance our assets, foster inclusive economic growth, and develop talented and motivated residents. In 2018, we launched the transformation of the St. Paul’s Area, which will reshape three public housing communities that encompass more than 200 acres near our thriving downtown. Investments in the people, physical infrastructure, and anchor institutions that are native to this area are helping us to attract new businesses and entrepreneurs that will drive regional productivity and growth. The neighborhoods of the St. Paul’s Area are just one example of the 16 qualified opportunity zones, the most of any city or county in the Commonwealth of Virginia, that we hope you will consider for investment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Clear Expression of Purpose
    The Park System of Norfolk, Virginia An Analysis of its Strengths and Weaknesses By The Trust for Public Land Center for City Park Excellence Washington, D.C. February 2005 Introduction and Executive Summary A venerable city with colonial-era roots, Norfolk, Virginia, has an increasingly bright future as the center of its large metropolitan area at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. In 2004, with their city in the midst of an impressive civic renaissance, a group of Norfolk citizen leaders became interested in knowing the state of Norfolk’s park and recreation system and how it compares with those of other similar cities. They turned to the Trust for Public Land’s Center for City Park Excellence, which is known for its studies of urban park systems, and contracted for an overview and analysis of Norfolk. With the assistance of the Bay Oaks Park Committee, and with cooperation from city officials, TPL undertook this study of Norfolk’s park system. Data on the system’s acreage, budget, manpower, and planning process was supplemented by interviews with city leaders, park and planning staff and Norfolk’s citizens. Utilizing an extensive database of city park information Norfolk was evaluated both on its own merits and against other American cities. By dint of time and budget, TPL’s analysis is not comprehensive; it only provides an initial set of snapshot views and comparisons. Nevertheless, the findings of this study are clear enough. By almost every measure, TPL finds that while the city of Norfolk has some wonderful parks, scenic riverfronts, tree-lined boulevards and sandy beaches, it simply doesn’t have enough of them.
    [Show full text]
  • City Manager Weekly Update April 18, 2019
    City Manager Weekly Update April 18, 2019 White House Opportunity Zone Conference: Vice Mayor Martin Thomas represented the City of Norfolk at the White House Opportunity Zone Conference with State, Local, Tribal and Community Leaders. The Conference was attended by representatives from 40 states and allowed the city to highlight our opportunity zones and projects. President Donald Trump, Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and Secretary Ben Carson highlighted how the administration will continue to elevate the program by adding preferences to federal grants for opportunity zones projects. The Conference allowed for municipalities to share how they are leveraging the program within their communities. Regional Advocacy: The Hampton Roads Planning District Commission held a meeting with legislative liaisons from throughout the region to discuss joint advocacy ahead of next year’s General Assembly session. The group discussed items such flooding, increased operating and infrastructure support for schools, transportation and transit, state support for joint land use studies, and offshore wind development. The group will continue to meet over the summer months and into the fall to assist in forming the region’s 2020 legislative priorities. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization: The Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) met this week to receive updates from our transportation partners. Virginia Department of Transportation presented the alternatives for improvements on the Bowers Hill Interchange and shared the preliminary environmental impacts. Public comments and meetings will continue on the proposals. HRTPO also provided an update on the Regional Bridge Study and shared that while the percentage of structurally deficient bridges has decreased that the region will have a future funding challenge as our infrastructure continues to age.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Community Impact Report Relationships
    GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT RELATIONSHIPSRELATIONSHIPS RELATIONSHIPS RELATIONSHIPS RELATIONSHIPSRELATIONSHIPS RELATIONSHIPSRELATIONSHIPS RELARELA COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT COMMUNITY IMPACT 0 2 0 2 RELATIONSHIPS RELATIONSHIPS PEOPLE ARE OUR PURPOSE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM A Letter from our CEO 2020 ANNUAL AWARD WINNERS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I think it is safe to say when we started the 2020 fiscal year no one ASSOCIATES OF THE YEAR Paul J. Atkinson, Sr. could have foreseen what this year would hold. As I reflect on this past year, I am proud and grateful for the collective efforts that ensured CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Eggleston’s work could continue – from our community partners rising to RELATIONSHIPS Ronald Fritch the occasion to support us – to the dedicated, essential employees who VICE PRESIDENT have provided vital supports for adults with disabilities in their daily lives. In this year’s FEDERAL CONTRACTS Community Impact Report we are pleased to once again highlight our Relationships, Impact, Chris Hoagland and Growth despite these uncertain times. VICE PRESIDENT When Eggleston was started 65 years ago, it was by a group of parents who wanted to find REHABILITATION SERVICES meaningful activities for their adult children with disabilities. Today it takes many different types of Tasha Jones Relationships to make Eggleston a success, and we are grateful for all of them. From the federal contracts with SourceAmerica to partnerships with Cox and other local businesses, we are able to DIRECTOR OF offer hundreds of work opportunities. With the support of our donors and other organizations, Robert “Michael” James “Preston” Tania Meechan Thomas Demary HUMAN RESOURCES we are able to provide residential and day programs to individuals with disabilities and brain Sadowski Wagner Brain Injury Services, Community Employment, Helene Russell injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH GHENT NORFOLK, VA Name of Property County and State
    NORTH GHENT NORFOLK, VA Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property No. Resources within Property [XI Private [ 1 Building(s) Contributing Noncontributing [ 1 Public-Local [XI District -32 1 -57 Buildings [ ] Public-State [ ] Site -0 -0 Sites [ ] Public-Federal [I Structure -0 -0 Structure [I Object -0 -0 Objects -32 1 57 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing NIA Resources previously listed in the National Register 0 6. Function or Use Hiitoric Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) DOMESTICISinele Dwellings DOMESTICISinele Dwellings DOMESTIC/Multiole Dwellings WMESTIC/Multiole Dwellings RELIGIONiRelieious Facilitv RELIGIONiReligious Facilitv COMMERCE/TRADEIBusiness COMMERCElTRADEBusiness COMMERCETRADE/SD~C~~I~~Store COMMERCETRADE/Swialtv Store COMMERCmRADWRestaurant COMMERCETRADWRestaurant SOCIAUMeeting Hall SOCIAUMeeting Hall 7. Description Architectural Classification (enter categories from instructions) MID-~~~CENTURYIG~~~~Revival LATE VICTORIANIOueen Anne LATE VICTORIANIShingle Style LATE VICTORIAN1 Italianate LATE 19" & 20" CENTURY REVNALSIColonial Revival [XI See continuation sheet Materials (enter categories from instructions) foundation: BricWConcretelStone walls: BrickiWood: Weatherboard: Svnthetics: AsbestosNinvl; Concrete: Metal: Aluminum roof: Asohalt: Stone: Slate: Asbestos: Metal other: Narrative Description Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets [XI See continuation sheet NORTH GHENT NORFOLK, VA Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark r in oxor more hoxer for rhe ctitena l~ntrrcotegoner from inrmrcnons) qualifying ihe propny for Nauonal Regisler listing.) ARCHKECTURE [ X ] A Property is associated with events that have COMMUNITY PLANNING made a significant contribution to the broad patterns & DEVELOPMENT of our history.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamptonroads-Cp.Pdf
    Attachment I: HRSD Collection System Violations VADEQ IR Date of Incident Location Address Receiving Waters Number 2/14/2003 2003-T-1475 Newport News 949 Backspin Court Storm Drain 2/16/2003 2003-T-1470 Norfolk 5734 Chesapeake Blvd Tidal 2/17/2003 2003-T-1472 Norfolk 5734 Chesapeake Blvd Wayne Creek/ Lafayette River 2/18/2003 2003-T-1491 Norfolk Monterey & Bluestone Ave Elizabeth River 3/8/2003 2003-T-1661 Newport News Rt 60 Near Enterprise Dr. Lee Hall Reservoir 4/7/2003 2003-T-1943 Newport News Center Ave PS Hampton Roads Harbor 4/7/2003 2003-T-1944 Hampton N. King Street & MacAlva Drive S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1961 Newport News Rt 60, Enterprise Dr & Picketts Lee Hall Reservoir Lane 4/9/2003 2003-T-1963 Newport News 320 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1964 Hampton N. King Street & MacAlva Drive S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1966 Suffolk 1136 Saunders Drive Shingle Creek 4/9/2003 2003-T-1989 Newport News 42 Franklin Street Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1990 Hampton E Gilbert & N. King Street S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1991 Hamptonp 3802 Chesapeakep Ave Hamptonp Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1992 Hampton 3847 Chesapeake Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1993 Hampton Bridge Street PS Salters Creek 4/9/2003 2003-T-1994 Hampton Ivy Home Rd & Victoria Blvd Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2016 Newport News Center Ave PS Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2017 Newport News 320 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2018 Newport News 321 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2019 Newport News 42 Franklin Street Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2020 Hampton N.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission Final Performance Report
    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission Final Performance Report Project Title: 1619: The Making of America” Project Directors - Cassandra Newby-Alexander and Eric Claville Grantee Institution - Norfolk State University and Hampton University Submission Date – December 9, 2014 1 Narrative Description The NEH-funded project, “Observing 1619,” provided the foundational support for us to host our second 1619: Making of America conference was held on September 18-19, 2014 at Norfolk State University and Hampton University. Planning this conference and accompanying programming targeting teachers has resulted in the creation of a broad-based partnership among various institutions, including the Hampton History Museum and the City of Hampton, our primary partners for 2013-2014. Moreover, our other partners included the College of Liberal Arts at Norfolk State University, Creative Services and Distance Learning at NSU, the NSU Foundation, Student Affairs at Norfolk State University, WHRO, the Fort Monroe National Monument (National Park Service), the Virginia Arts Festival Hampton University, Old Dominion University, Media Park at ODU, the Nottoway Indian Tribe of Virginia, Virginia Wesleyan College, the College of William and Mary’s Lemon Project, the Sankofa Project, the NSU Honors College, and the Intelligence Community Center for Academic Excellence at NSU. In addition, over the past two years, the project has received funding from the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission, Cox Communications, Dominion Resources, the Fort Norfolk Plaza, Bedford/ St. Martin’s Publishing, Pearson Publishing, the Fort Monroe National Monument (National Park Service), the NSU Foundation, Student Affairs at Norfolk State University, the College of Liberal Arts at Norfolk State University, and the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Elizabeth River 2014
    State of the Elizabeth River Scorecard 2014 November 17, 2014 Scientific data compiled & analyzed by: Elizabeth River State of the River Steering Committee 2014, Convened by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and The Elizabeth River Project Summarized and interpreted for the public by: Summary: From Almost Dead to an Average Score of C And Most Notorious Branch is Now the Most Improved Parents might not think a C is too hot, if your kid brings it home from school. But when one of the three most toxic rivers on the Chesapeake Bay brings home a C, that’s reason to celebrate. The Elizabeth River was commonly presumed dead when The Elizabeth River Project entered the picture in 1993. Fast forward to 2014. Area scientists have scored each of the branches of the Elizabeth for an average overall health of C for this urban river. Better news yet: The notoriously polluted Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River shows the most improving trends. This is the long stretch of the river that has been industrialized since before the Revolution; the branch too often in the past was described as devoid of life. For this report, area scientists found improving trends for bacteria, nitrogen, bottom health, and contaminants on the bottom of the Southern Branch. A committee of local, state and regional scientists prepared this State of the River report for The Elizabeth River Project and VA Department of Environmental Quality to determine changes since the last comprehensive scorecard for the Elizabeth River, issued by the same partners in 2008, and to identify trends over the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth River Presentation
    Restoring One of America’s Greatest Rivers -Elizabeth River - Josef Rieger Deputy Director – Restoration Chesapeake Bay Program’s Toxic Contaminants Workgroup The Elizabeth River Project Mission: Restore the Elizabeth River to the highest practical level of environmental quality through government, business, & community partnerships. 2,000 citizen members 114 River Star facilities Government projects with US Navy, NOAA, US Army Corps of Engineers, US EPA, VA DEQ, VA DCR, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach, & Chesapeake. Elizabeth River Watershed • 200 sq. mile Lafayette River watershed Lafayette River • 4 Cities • Great Dismal Swamp Portsmouth freshwater Virginia Beach source Chesapeake • Trapped Estuary Action Plan for Restoring Elizabeth Action 1 – Goo Must Go! Cleanup contaminated sediments Action 2 – Greener shores Action 3 – Reduce bacteria Action 4 – Reduce nutrients Action 5 – Business ethic Action 6 – Protective policies Action 7 – Engage 25,000 citizen soldiers Elizabeth River Sediments Contamination from PAH - highest in the Chesapeake Bay (463 times average for bay) Cancer in the Mummichog Healthy Mummichog Liver Pre-Cancerous Mummichog Liver Cancerous Mummichog Liver Money Point – A Story of Environmental Restoration Money Point Money Point History & Legacy Impacts 12,126,000 12,127,000 Holland 3,454,000 Rotterdam 3,454,000 Ber Lem 3,453,000 3,453,000 Amerada Hess Navigation Channel Surface PAH (mg/Kg) < 45 3,452,000 45 - 100 3,452,000 100 - 500 500 - 1,000 Elizabeth River 1,000 - 2,000 2,000 - 3,000 Terminals > 3,000 Money Point, VA Alt 5A. Dredging in the north and NOTE: Coordinate System: VA State Plane Science Applications International Corporation a sand cap to the south Horizontal Datum: NAD83 A221 Third St.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, January 13, 2020 6:30 Pm Eggleston's Guest Speaker
    January 2020 cprv.net Time to Renew Your Civic League Membership! Civic League Meeting: By John W. Robertson, Membership Chairperson Monday, All 2019 Civic League memberships expired on De- January 13, 2020 cember 31 – now is the time to renew for 2020! 6:30 pm Eggleston’s The Civic League is an important part of life in Colonial (110 Lavalette Ave) Place and Riverview, and your membership is important to make sure your ideas and opinions are heard and so Membership is not required to we can continue to represent our residents when deal- attend meetings. All are welcome. ing with various City officials and employees. Guest Speaker: Your membership supports our efforts to: • improve and protect property values; (To Be Determined) • make sure streetlights are repaired and working; • report street issues like potholes and make sure Watch Next Door and they are repaired promptly; CPRV Facebook Page • help reduce crimes like car larcenies and thefts for Updates by “porch pirates”; • redevelop historic structures such as JEB Stuart School; • provide residents a chance to interact with Coun- cil members and others of interest; • provide a Community Garden for anyone to use; • improve our environment with cleanups and ed- ucational efforts; • hold social events to bring neighbors together. Joining or renewing is easy! You may join or renew CPRV Civic League online at www.cprv.net, in person at any monthly Civic meetings on YouTube! League meeting, or by mail (check the back of your https://tinyurl.com/cprv-video newsletter for the form and address). Visit us on Facebook Thank you! https://www.facebook.com/ groups/237900040089891/ January 2020 cprv.net Colonial Place/Riverview Colonial Place/Riverview Community Newsletter Curbside Recycling Schedule The official publication of the Colonial Place/Riverview Civic League Thursday, January 16, 2020 Norfolk, Virginia Published 12 times per year.
    [Show full text]
  • A Water Quality Study of the Elizabeth River: the Effects
    A WATER QUALITY STUDY OF THE ELIZABETH RIVER: THE EFFECTS OF THE ARMY BASE AND LAMRERT POINT STP EFFLUENTS by Bruce J. Neilson Special Report No, 75 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering A Report to Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Yattern Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 William J. Hargis, Jr. Director May 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Conclusions and Recommendations ........... 1 Chapt Chapter 3 . The Fate of Materials Discharged into the Elizabeth River System ................ 12 Chapter 4 . Water Quality in the Elizabeth River System .................................... 44 Chapter 5 . Summary ................................... 52 Chapter 6 . Acknowledgements .......................... 54 Chapter 7 . References ................................... 55 Appendix A . Hydrologic and Climatological Data ........ 56 Appendix B . Data on Sewage Treatment Plants Discharging to the Elizabeth River System ................................... 66 Appendix C . Biological Surveys ........................ 71 Appendix D . Data from Water Quality Surveys and Dye Studies ............................... 83 Appendix E . Elizabeth River Model ..................... 103 CHAPTER 1. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1) An analysis of the slack water data from 1974 indicates that when strong stratidication exists in Hampton Roads, there will be strong vertical stratification in the Elizabeth River system as well. For these conditions, a non-tidal circulation will be set up which will enhance the exchange of water
    [Show full text]