DOCSLIB.ORG

In Re Limelight Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation 07-CV-01603

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 26 ) In re LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. ) Master File No. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document relates to: ) ) ) All Actions ) ) ) LODGED: Proposed Lead Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Proposed Class Action Settlement And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof Attached Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 26 1 TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. Richard G. Himelrick, #004738 2 J. James Christian, #023614 Third Floor Camelback Esplanade II 3 2525 East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4237 4 Telephone: (602) 255-6000 Facsimile: (602) 255-0103 5 [email protected] [email protected] 6 Lead Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel 7 BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER MELTZER & 8 CHECK, LLP Christopher L. Nelson, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice) 9 Mark S. Danek, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice) 280 King of Prussia Road 10 Radnor, PA 19087 Telephone: (610) 667-7706 11 Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 [email protected] 12 [email protected] 13 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP Christopher J. Keller, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice) 14 Jonathan Gardner, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice) 140 Broadway 15 New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 907-0700 16 Facsimile: (212) 818-0477 [email protected] 17 [email protected] 18 Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 21 ) In re LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. ) Master File No. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB 22 SECURITIES LITIGATION ) )LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED 23 ) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY This Document relates to: ) APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 24 ) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND )MEMORANDUM OF POINTS 25 All Actions ) AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT )THEREOF 26 ) ) 27 ) ) 28 ) ) LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NO. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 3 of 26 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii 3 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 4 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 3 5 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEEDINGS 3 6 II. SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS 5 7 III. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 6 8 IV. PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 7 9 ARGUMENT 7 10 I. THE SETTLEMENT MERITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 7 11 A. The Settlement Is the Result of a Thorough and Arm’s-Length Process 8 12 B. The Settlement Is Well Within the Range of Reasonableness 9 13 II. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE SATISFIES THE 14 REQUIREMENTS OF RULES 23(d) AND (e) AND DUE PROCESS 11 15 III. THE COURT SHOULD PRELIMINARILY CERTIFY THE SETTLEMENT CLASS 13 16 A. Standards Applicable to Class Certification 13 17 B. The Settlement Class Meets the Requirements of Rule 23(a) 14 18 1. Rule 23(a)(1): Numerosity 14 19 2. Rule 23(a)(2): Questions of Law or Fact Are Common 15 20 3. Rule 23(a)(3): Lead Plaintiffs’ Claims Are Typical 16 21 4. Rule 23(a)(4): The Lead Plaintiffs Are Adequate 16 22 C. The Settlement Class Meets the Requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) 17 23 1. Common Questions of Law or Fact Predominate 17 24 2. A Class Action Is a Superior Method of Adjudication 18 25 D. Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel Should Be Appointed Class Counsel 19 26 CONCLUSION 19 27 28 LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF i PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, No. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 4 of 26 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Cases Page(s) 3 Amchem Prods. Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) 17 4 Blackie v. Barack, 5 524 F.2d 891 (9th Cir. 1975) 15 6 Bogner v. Masari Inv. Inc., 257 F.R.D. 529(D. Ariz. 2009) 16 7 Churchill Village, L.L.C. v. Gen. Elec., 8 361 F.3d 566 (9th Cir. 2004) 10, 12 9 Class Plaintiffs v. City of Seattle, 955 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1992) 7 10 In re Cooper Cos. Sec. Litig., 11 254 F.R.D. 628 (C.D. Cal. 2009) 13, 17 12 Desai v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Litig., No. 08-55081, 2009 WL 2245223 (9th Cir. July 29, 2009) 14, 18 13 Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 14 509 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2007) 14 15 Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 1998) 17 16 Horton v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co., 17 266 F.R.D. 360 (D. Ariz. 2009) 8, 10, 13 18 Jaffe v. Morgan Stanley & Co., No. C-06-3903 THE, 2008 WL 346417 (ND. Cal. Feb. 7, 2008) 13 19 Lerwill v. Infligh t Motion Pictures, Inc., 20 582 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1978) 16 21 Linney v. Cellular Alaska P’ship, 151 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 1998) 7 22 McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 23 247 F.R.D. 598 (S.D. Cal. 2007) 18 24 Mendoza v. Tucson Sch. Dist. No. 1, 623 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1980) 12 25 Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 26 339 U.S. 306 (1950) 12 27 Negrete v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 238 F.R.D. 482 (C.D. Cal. 2006) 18 28 LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ii PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, No. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 5 of 26 1 In re Omnivision Tech. Inc., 559 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. Cal. 2008) 9 2 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Cmty. v. U.S., 3 266 F.R.D. 375 (D. Ariz. 2010) 15 4 Stratton v. Am. Med. Sec. Inc., 266 F.R.D. 340 (D. Ariz. 2009) 16 5 In re THQ, Inc. Sec. Litig., 6 No. CV-001783 (EX), 2002 WL 1832145 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2002) 13 7 Weinberger v. Jackson, 102 F.R.D. 839 (N.D. Cal. 1984) 16 8 West v. Circle K Stores, Inc., 9 No. S-04-0438, 2006 WL 1652598 (E.D. Cal. June 13, 2006) 7, 8, 9 10 Yamner v. Boich, No. 92-20597, 1994 WL 514035 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 1994) 13, 15 11 12 13 STATUTES 14 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) 14, 19 15 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(2) 15 16 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) 17 17 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3)(A)-(D) 18 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(1) 19 19 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-4 2 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF iii PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, No. CV07-01603-PHX-SRB Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 6 of 26 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 2 Mitchell Robbins, David Gechlik, Thaiky Nguyen and Del G. Nuzum (collectively 3 “Lead Plaintiffs”), the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs for the proposed class, submit this 4 memorandum of law in support of their unopposed motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 23(e), for preliminary approval of the proposed $1,900,000 cash settlement (the 6 “Settlement”) of claims against defendants Limelight Networks, Inc. (“Limelight” or the 7 “Company”); Jeffrey W. Lunsford, Nathan F. Raciborski, Michael W. Gordon, Allan M. 8 Kaplan, Walter D. Amaral, Joseph H. Gleberman, Fredric W. Harman, Mark A. Jung, 9 Peter J. Perrone, David C. Peterschmidt, Gary Valenzuela and Matthew Hale (the 10 “Individual Defendants”); and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co. 11 Incorporated, Jefferies & Company, Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., and Friedman, Billings, 12 Ramsey & Co. Inc. (the “Underwriters” and collectively, with Limelight and the 13 Individual Defendants, “Defendants”) in this proposed class action (the “Litigation”), as 14 set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of October 29, 2010 (the 15 “Stipulation”). 1 16 If approved, the Settlement will finally resolve Lead Plaintiffs’ appeal of the 17 dismissal of their claims to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and 18 release all claims, and related claims, in the Litigation. 19 In connection with preliminary approval of the Settlement, and for purposes of 20 settlement only, Lead Plaintiffs respectfully request preliminary certification of a 21 settlement class of all Persons who purchased or acquired the common stock of Limelight 22 Networks, Inc. between June 7, 2007 and August 14, 2007, inclusive (the “Settlement 23 Class Period”), and were allegedly damaged thereby, including those persons or entities 24 who acquired shares of Limelight common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to 25 Limelight’s initial public offering (the “Settlement Class”), and appointment of Lead 26 27 1 All capitalized terms used herein are defined in the Stipulation and have the same meaning as set forth therein. A true and correct copy of the Stipulation, with annexed 28 exhibits, is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1. LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 1 PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, CV-06-5036-R (CWX) Case 2:07-cv-01603-SRB Document 116 Filed 11/15/10 Page 7 of 26 1 Plaintiffs as Class Representatives and Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) 2 and Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check, LLP (“Barroway Topaz,” together with 3 Labaton Sucharow, “Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel”) as Class Counsel for the Settlement 4 Class. Lead Plaintiffs also seek approval of the form, substance and the requirements of 5 the proposed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (“Notice”), 6 Proof of Claim and Release form (“Proof of Claim”), and the Summary Notice 7 (“Summary Notice”), appended as Exhibits A-1 to A-3 to the Proposed Order 8 Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing for Notice (“Preliminary Approval 9 Order”), annexed here to as Exhibit 2, and the means and methods for disseminating 10 notice, as comporting with due process and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 11 of 1995 (the “PSLRA”), 15 U.
Recommended publications
  • Jean-Charles Dupoire

    Jean-Charles Dupoire

    Autumn 2003 jo180º FROM lee ORDINARY JO LEE’s Exclusive Interview: The Prince of Epic Jean-Charles Dupoire Hijacked on the Wire Cataract Tuscan Surgery Dreams: Dark Ages Sculptor,Writer Gone Linda Kay Marie Who&Where HowaBusiness art thine enemies? is Born IRAQ: How to Grow AJustWar? Without Violence The Adeste Prize We Invite The Award corporations/individuals Successful awardees will to contribute to those receive the exquisitely designed who have achieved. Adeste Crystal Medallion. Foresight requires a curiosity as deep Whenever the committee recognizes an as it is boundless… and our greatest achievement above and beyond incentive should be in helping those expectation – an additional cash prize who are young. that embraces the ‘on-going endeavors’ We at JO LEE give you an ‘open’ of an Awardee, will be given.Awards will invitation to embrace those who may be announced in November of each year. otherwise not be recognized and assist them in ‘seeing the future before it arrives’. Criteria THE Adeste Prize will be awarded to The achievement by the Candidate ‘The 40 and under individuals’ for should be of a humanitarian act of achievements in the categories of the significant magnitude which positively Humanities, Social Justice,Technology, benefits mankind by advancing the Arts, and Medicine. ability to meet a basic need or should Nominations are urged by readers be a new, original, and meaningful around the world. Please! Submit the discovery. name of someone you believe is deserving of such an award. Nominees should have either achieved extra-ordinary findings, or excelled beyond their limits in inspiring others to ‘touch the stars’ ADESTE takes as its Credo – the lessons behind Nobel.

  • With Protests, Israelis Are Seeking the Revival of the Welfare State PAGE 10

    www.sajewishreport.co.za Friday, 5 August 2011 / 5 Av, 5771 Volume 15 Number 29 With protests, Israelis are seeking the revival of the welfare state PAGE 10 Israeli students, holding a sign reading “Welfare state now!”, protest outside the Israeli Parliament in Jerusalem against the high cost of living, on August 1. (MIRIAM ALSTER/FLASH90) SAKS: The Jewish thread Bulawayo library named Cycalive spreads Jewish graves vandalised in Mandela’s life / 11 for Moshe Silberhaft / 3 outreach wings / 5 in Ermelo cemetery / 3 YOUTH / 16 SPORT / 20 LETTERS / 14 CROSSWORD & BRIDGE / 18 COMMUNITY BUZZ / 7 WHAT’S ON / 18 2 SA JEWISH REPORT 05 - 12 August 2011 PARSHA OF THE WEEK SHABBAT AND FAST TIMES August 5/5 Av Tisha B’Av August 6/6 Av Published by To blame or to bless… August 8/8 Av S A Jewish Report (Pty) Ltd, Devarim August 9/9 Av PO Box 84650, Greenside, 2034 Tel: (011) 023-8160 PARSHAT Starts Ends Starts Ends Fax: (086) 634-7935 17:26 18:16 Johannesburg 17:42 18:10 Johannesburg Printed by Caxton Ltd DEVARIM 17:52 18:45 Cape Town 18:09 18:36 Cape Town EDITOR - Geoff Sifrin Rabbi Moshe Kazilsky 17:08 18:00 Durban 17:25 17:53 Durban [email protected] Johannesburg Sephardi Hebrew 17:29 18:20 Bloemfontein 17:45 18:13 Bloemfontein Congregation 17:23 18:16 Port Elizabeth 17:40 18:08 Port Elizabeth COMMERCIAL MANAGER 17:15 18:08 East London 17:32 18:00 East London Sue Morris WE BEGIN this Shabbat the final book of the Torah, the [email protected] book of Devarim.
  • February Layout 1

    February Layout 1

    Vol. 38-No. 3 ISSN 0892-1571 January/February 2012-Shevat/Adar 5772 “THEIR HOPES AND GOOD DEEDS REACH TO HEAVEN” UN HONORS MEMORY OF CHILDREN WHO PERISHED IN THE HOLOCAUST n January 27 the United Nations separated from their families, suffered formation’s Holocaust and the UN Out- and can understand the impact of their Ohonored the memory of the more from hunger and cold, and lived in fear reach Program, which organized this words and attitudes towards those who are than 1.5 million boys and girls who per- and uncertainty. week’s events. different from them. ished in the Holocaust, with top officials “Yet, somehow, many of these children “Today, the United Nations remembers “Hateful words can translate into hateful stressing the need to speak out against in- found ways to cope with the horror and these children and pledges to continue to actions and the consequences can be dire. tolerance and to protect the lives and Children and young people must be taught human rights of children around the world. their history, including the terrible mistakes “One and a half million Jewish children of the past, so that they can be vigilant perished in the Holocaust — victims of per- against all manifestations of hatred from secution by the Nazis and their supporters. the outset,” she said in a statement. “Tens of thousands of other children li Zborowski, Chairman of the Ameri- were also murdered. They included peo- Ecan Society for Yad Vashem, speaking ple with disabilities as well as Roma and at the opening of the exhibition “A Monument Sinti.
  • December 2006

    December 2006

    DECEMBER 2006 VOLUME 20 NUMBER 4 Ben Meed, k”z; Leader of the International Day of Commemoration American Gathering of the Victims of the Holocaust by Michael Berenbaum at the United Nations, January 29 Benjamin Meed is no longer. He died on Tuesday October 22nd the second of Mar Heshvan 5767, surrounded by Registration Required his family: his wife, Vladka, his son, Steven, and daughter-in-law, Rita, his On January daughter, Anna, his five grand- 29, 2007, the children and his beloved sister, United Nations Genia, who arrived from Israel that Department of morning, just in time. Public I learned the Holocaust from Ben Information and Vladka Meed—not the facts and (DPI) will the book knowledge, but something observe the deeper and ultimately more second annual important. I learned from them, as International did millions of others, the human Day of Com- face and human ethos of the Jewish memoration in people who lived through that dark memory of the time and came out determined to give victims of the over the voices, the sounds, the sighs, Holocaust with the courage, compassion and a ceremony from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM m the General Assembly Hall at United determination of those who were Nations Headquarters. Simone Veil, President of the Fondation Four la Memoire lost. de la Shoah and a survivor of the Holocaust, will deliver the keynote address. Benjamin Meed was born cont’d on p. 9 Benjamin Miedzyrzecki in Warsaw, Poland, to a working-class religious family that lived in the old Jewish Sigmund Strochlitz, z”l area.