The Local Government Boundary Commission for England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF TEWKESBURY Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Tewkesbury October 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information TWYNING applied as part of this review. CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. TEWKESBURY BUCKLAND CP Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. NORTH & The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. TWYNING DUMBLETON CP ISBOURNE KEY TO PARISH WARDS NORTHWAY STANTON BISHOPS CLEEVE CP CP CP NORTHWAY A CLEEVE GRANGE I B CLEEVE ST MICHAEL'S C CLEEVE WEST SNOWSHILL H CP BROCKWORTH CP TODDINGTON TEWKESBURY TEDDINGTON CP CP D BROCKWORTH EAST EAST E BROCKWORTH WEST ASHCHURCH CHURCHDOWN CP RURAL CP FORTHAMPTON ALDERTON F CHURCHDOWN BROOKFIELD CP CP G CHURCHDOWN ST JOHN'S WHEATPIECES CP TEWKESBURY CP J H TEWKESBURY NEWTOWN TEWKESBURY STANWAY CP OXENTON CP I TEWKESBURY NORTH CP J TEWKESBURY SOUTH TEWKESBURY SOUTH GRETTON CHACELEY CP CP PRESCOTT GOTHERINGTON CP CP TIRLEY STOKE CP ORCHARD CP DEERHURST CP SEVERN VALE NORTH C CLEEVE ST WINCHCOMBE MICHAEL'S CP CLEEVE WEST B WOODMANCOTE HASFIELD CP CP BISHOP'S ELMSTONE CLEEVE CP WINCHCOMBE HARDWICKE CP A CLEEVE GRANGE LEIGH CLEEVE CP HILL ASHLEWORTH CP HIGHNAM WITH HAW BRIDGE UCKINGTON CP SOUTHAM CP SUDELEY CP BODDINGTON CP NORTON CP SEVERN VALE SOUTH HAWLING SANDHURST CP CP STAVERTON DOWN CP HATHERLEY CP TWIGWORTH CP MAISEMORE CP G CHURCHDOWN ST JOHN'S INNSWORTH INNSWORTH CP LONGFORD CP CHURCHDOWN CP HIGHNAM CP F CHURCHDOWN BROOKFIELD WITH HUCCLECOTE SHURDINGTON CP BADGEWORTH SHURDINGTON HUCCLECOTE CP BADGEWORTH CP MINSTERWORTH CP BROCKWORTH EAST E D BROCKWORTH CP BROCKWORTH WEST KEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY GREAT WITCOMBE CP PARISH BOUNDARY 00.5 1 2 PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY Kilometres PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY 1cm = 0.332km INNSWORTH PROPOSED WARD NAME LONGFORD CP PARISH NAME.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

(PPG) MEETING – 1430 on 3 SEP 19 Present
4 Sep 19 THE ALNEY PRACTICE – PRACTICE PARTICIPATION GROUP (PPG) MEETING – 1430 ON 3 SEP 19 Present: Apologies Philip Tagg (PT) Practice Manager Katherine Holland (KH) Rachael Banfield (RB) Health Care Assistant CCG Jeremy Base (JB) Pamela Dewick (KD) Jennifer Taylor (JT) Geoffrey Gidley (GG) Megan Birchley (MB) Mark Weaver (MW) Ken Newman (KN) Nadia Schneider (NS) Carol Kurylat (CK) Taras Kurylat (TK) Denise Leach (DL) Nicky Milligan (NM) 1. PT welcomed attendees to the meeting and thanked them for expressing an interest in establishing a PPG. He explained the background to the former PPGs for the pre-merger practices: • Cheltenham Road Surgery’s PPG was made up of members of the ‘Friends of Cheltenham Road Surgery’, which was a registered charity with the principal aim of raising funds for the surgery, to be spent to the benefit of its patients. The Friends ceased to operate several years ago when several of the members became too old to continue and there were no volunteers willing to take on committee roles. Subsequent attempts to create a replacement PPG were unsuccessful. • College Yard and Highnam had a PPG, which ceased to be active around the time of the merger. 2. PPGs aim to be representative of the practice population and have a principal aim of meeting on regular basis to discuss the services on offer, and how improvements can be made for the benefit of patients and the practice. This initial meeting aimed to set the scene and agree a way ahead. PT also indicated that as a result of the practice merger we will be liable for a CQC inspection before the end of Mar 20, with the potential that they will wish to speak with the PPG at that time.
[Show full text]
The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2020-2036
Regulation 14 draft for consultation January 2021 The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2020-2036 The Leigh Neighbourhood Development Plan Regulation 14 Draft, January 2021 2 The Leigh Neighbourhood Development Plan Regulation 14 Draft, January 2021 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan ............................................................................. 5 Neighbourhood Plan Area and Period .................................................................................................... 7 Background to The Leigh and the NDP ................................................................................................... 9 Flooding................................................................................................................................................. 10 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................. 16 Parish Aspirations ................................................................................................................................. 16 Community Action Point ....................................................................................................................... 17 The Development Plan .........................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Various Roads, Churchdown, Tewkesbury Borough) (Variation) Order 2020
GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ON STREET PARKING ORDER 2017 (VARIOUS ROADS, CHURCHDOWN, TEWKESBURY BOROUGH) (VARIATION) ORDER 2020 NOTICE is hereby given that Gloucestershire County Council has made a Variation Order under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, the effect of which would vary the Gloucestershire County Council On Street Parking Order 2017 (the 2017 Order) by introducing the proposed restrictions described in the Schedule below along all/part of the various roads described within Churchdown in the Borough of Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire. THE SCHEDULE No Waiting At Any Time Road Name, Extent Number Craven Drive Along sections on both sides of the carriageway at the junctions of Hazelcroft Road No 42611 (Road No 45719) and Martindale Road (Road No 42612). Martindale Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Craven Road Drive (Road No 42611). Road No 42612 Hazelcroft Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Craven Road No 45719 Drive (Road No 42611). Station Road Along a section on the western side of the carriageway between its junction Road No 3/80 with Church Road (Road No 3/80) and the Primary School entrance. Along a section on the eastern side of the carriageway close to its junction with Barnhay (Road No 72047) Station Road Road No 3/364 Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Pirton Lane (Road No 3/364). Pirton Lane Along sections on the eastern side of the carriageway close to its junction with Road No 3/364 Station Road (Road No 3/364) and Vicarage Close (Road No 47843).
[Show full text]
Recruitment Pack Board of Trustees the Roses Theatre Is Looking for New Members to Join the Board of Trustees
Recruitment Pack Board of Trustees The Roses Theatre is looking for new members to join the Board of Trustees. The role will support the organisation in the next stage of its development as it recovers from the impact of Covid-19 and implements a new business plan and strategy. The Trust is specifically seeking a board member with qualifications in accountancy. Board members are expected to: • Attend up to 12 board meetings a year and a board “Away Day” for in-service training. • Meetings are normally 6-8pm pm at the theatre on a Wednesday. • Read papers prepared by the staff. • Be prepared to introduce professional and personal contacts for the benefit of the theatre. • Join a committee or a task-related working party from time to time. • Attend arts events at the theatre in order to have a better understanding of the theatre’s work. • Support, advocate and participate in the fundraising activities of the theatre. • Attend certain networking events and undertake advocacy for the theatre. • Give informal advice and support to theatre staff where appropriate. The Roses Is an equal opportunities employer. About The Roses The Roses is a 374 seat mixed arts centre in Gloucestershire and is the largest cultural organisation in the Borough of Tewkesbury. It welcomes around 80,000 visitors every year and provides wide-ranging events both to the local community and to tourists visiting the medieval market town. Originally built in 1974 to provide a cultural heart for Tewkesbury, an extension in 2015 expanded the venue’s front of house space and created a new bar and coffee shop.
[Show full text]
4542 the London Gazette, 21 August, 1953
4542 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 AUGUST, 1953 Railway Line by way of an overhead reinforced Standish—Hope Cottage, Gloucester Road, Stone- concrete footbridge with approaches. house. A certified copy of the Order and of the map con- Tirley—Torsend Cottage, Tirley. tained in the Order as confirmed by the Minister has Twigworth—c/o Mr. E. J. Jones, Far End, Twig- been deposited at the Council Offices, Argyle Road* worth. Sevenoaks, and will be open for inspection free of Upton St. Leonards—'Village Hall, Upton St. charge between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on Leonards. Weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 12 noon on Westbury-on-Severn—Lecture Hall, Westbury-on- Saturday. Severn. The Order becomes operative as from 'the 21st Whitminster—c/o iMr. A. E. Wyer, The Garage, day of August, 1953, but if any person aggrieved Whitminster. by the Order desires to question the validity thereof In exceptional circumstances special arrangements or of any provision contained therein on the grounds will be made for the draft map and statement to be that it is not within the powers of the National Parks inspected out of office hours. and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, or on the Any objection or representation with respect to ground -that any requirement of the Act or any the draft map or statement may be sent in writ- regulation made thereunder has not been complied ing to the undersigned before the 30th day of April, with in relation to the approval of the Order he 1954, and any such objection or representation should may.
[Show full text]
Mark Chadwick Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 31 March
Mark Chadwick Our Ref: APP/G1630/V/14/2229497 Hunter Page Planning 18 High Street Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1DZ 31 March 2016 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION BY ERLP AND THE MERCHANT VENTURERS LAND AT ‘PERRYBROOK’ TO THE NORTH OF BROCKWORTH AND SOUTH OF THE A417, BROCKWORTH, GLOUCESTERSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/01256/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Mrs KA Ellison BA, MPhil, MRTPI, who held a inquiry from 28-30 July 2015 into your client’s application to Tewkesbury Borough Council (‘the Council’) for outline planning permission for the mixed use development of up to 1,500 dwellings including extra care housing, community facilities including Al, A2, A3, A4 and A5 local retail shops, B1 /B8 employment uses, D1 health facilities and formal/informal public open space, in accordance with application ref 12/01256/OUT, dated 5 December 2012. 2. On 24 November 2014, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority, Tewkesbury Borough Council, after consideration of policy on calling-in applications. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the application be approved and planning permission granted. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed.
[Show full text]
The Iron Age Tom Moore
The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
[Show full text]
Communications Roads Cheltenham Lies on Routes Connecting the Upper Severn Vale with the Cotswolds to the East and Midlands to the North
DRAFT – VCH Gloucestershire 15 [Cheltenham] Communications Roads Cheltenham lies on routes connecting the upper Severn Vale with the Cotswolds to the east and Midlands to the north. Several major ancient routes passed nearby, including the Fosse Way, White Way and Salt Way, and the town was linked into this important network of roads by more local, minor routes. Cheltenham may have been joined to the Salt Way running from Droitwich to Lechlade1 by Saleweistrete,2 or by the old coach road to London, the Cheltenham end of which was known as Greenway Lane;3 the White Way running north from Cirencester passed through Sandford.4 The medieval settlement of Cheltenham was largely ranged along a single high street running south-east and north-west, with its church and manorial complex adjacent to the south, and burgage plots (some still traceable in modern boundaries) running back from both frontages.5 Documents produced in the course of administering the liberty of Cheltenham refer to the via regis, the king’s highway, which is likely to be a reference to this public road running through the liberty. 6 Other forms include ‘the royal way at Herstret’ and ‘the royal way in the way of Cheltenham’ (in via de Cheltenham). Infringements recorded upon the via regis included digging and ploughing, obstruction with timbers and dungheaps, the growth of trees and building of houses.7 The most important local roads were those running from Cheltenham to Gloucester, and Cheltenham to Winchcombe, where the liberty administrators were frequently engaged in defending their lords’ rights. Leland described the roads around Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury as ‘subject to al sodeyne risings of Syverne, so that aftar reignes it is very foule to 1 W.S.
[Show full text]
Cheltenham Borough Council and Tewkesbury Borough Council Final Assessment Report November 2016
CHELTENHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL AND TEWKESBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 QUALITY, INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM Knight, Kavanagh & Page Ltd Company No: 9145032 (England) MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Registered Office: 1 -2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury BL9 0UF T: 0161 764 7040 E: [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk CHELTENHAM AND TEWKESBURY COUNCILS BUILT LEISURE AND SPORTS ASSESSMENT REPORT CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 4 SECTION 3: INDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES ASSESSMENT APPROACH ................... 16 SECTION 4: SPORTS HALLS ........................................................................................ 18 SECTION 5: SWIMMING POOLS ................................................................................... 38 SECTION 6: HEALTH AND FITNESS SUITES ............................................................... 53 SECTION 7: SQUASH COURTS .................................................................................... 62 SECTION 8: INDOOR BOWLS ....................................................................................... 68 SECTION 9: INDOOR TENNIS COURTS ....................................................................... 72 SECTION 10: ATHLETICS ............................................................................................. 75 SECTION 11: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ......................................................................
[Show full text]
Before the Judge of the County Court of Gloucestershire, Holden at The
368 Before the Judge of the County Court of Witham, and Braintree Railway, previously of Witham Gloucestershire, holden at the Shire-Hall, in the aforesaid, out of business, and previously of Witham , aforesaid, Grocer, Draper, and General Shopkeeper. city of Gloucester, on the 18th day of February James Bridge, of Mundon, in the county of Essex, Grocer, 1848, at Ten o'Clock in the Forenoon pre- Baker, and Dealer, previously of the same place, Boot cisely. and Shoe Maker Charles Gilbert Clarke, formerly of Longford, near the city but in the county of Gloucester, Farmer, having Lands N.B.—1. If any Creditor intends to oppose a in the hamlets of Longford Saint Mary, Wootton Saint Mary, Longford Saint Catharine, and Twigworth Saint Prisoner's discharge, notice of such intention must Man', all in the county of Gloucester, then of Lowbands be given to the said Prisoner, in writing, which and Applehurst Farms, Redmarley D' Abitot, Worcester- may be left at the Gaol two clear clays before the shire, Farmer, then of No. 60, Stafford-place, Pimlico, in day of hearing above mentioned, exclusive of the county of Middlesex, out of business, then of Stock- well, Surrey, Butcher, then in Lodgings at No. 4, Milton- Sunday, and exclusive both of the day of giving terrace, Vauxhall-road, Piinlico, in the county of Middle- such notice and of the said day of hearing. sex, out of business, then of Winchcomb, Gloucestershire, Relieving Officer of the Winchcomb Union Workhouse, 2. The petition and schedule will be pro- and late of No. 33, Northgate-street, in the city of duced by the proper Officer for inspection Gloucester, out of business.
[Show full text]
Statement of Consultation
Gloucestershire Waste Core Strategy (WCS) Regulation 30(d) Statement of Consultation Prepared in accordance with Regulation 30(d) of the Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 September 2011 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Who was consulted? 3. How were they consulted? 4. How many responses were received? 5. What were the main issues raised and how have these been taken into account? APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Schedule of Key Issues Appendix 2 – List of consultees Appendix 3 – Waste forum attendees (March 2006) Appendix 4 – Waste forum attendees (October 2007) 2 1. Introduction 1.1 This ‘statement of consultation’ has been produced in support of the publication Gloucestershire Waste Core Strategy (WCS) December 2010 and fulfils the requirements of Regulation 27 and 30(d) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008. 1.2 The purpose of the statement is to set out the following: . Which bodies and persons were invited to make representations during the preparation of the WCS (the stage known as ‘Regulation 25’) . How those bodies and persons were invited to make those representations . A summary of the main issues raised; and . How those issues have been addressed in the WCS. 1.3 Preparation of the WCS has taken place in three main stages; issues and options (2006) preferred options (2008) and site options (2009). A certain amount of ongoing consultation has also been carried out in between each stage. 1.4 Below we outline who was consulted at each stage, how they were consulted, the main issues raised and how these have been taken into account in the publication WCS.
[Show full text]
Central Severn Vale Providing Door to Door Travel Choices Draft Local Transport Plan Connecting Places Strategy CPS 1 – Central Severn Vale
Draft Local Transport Plan Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan Connecting Places Strategy 2015-31 A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth CPS 1 – Central Severn Vale providing door to door travel choices Draft Local Transport Plan Connecting Places Strategy CPS 1 – Central Severn Vale Version 1.0 Snapshot of stakeholder views Last Revised October 2015 If you just look Review Date at how much new Category Transport Planning development is The A417 Missing coming – you realise Owner Gloucestershire County Council the present transport Link has to be addressed; and road network Target Audience Anyone wanting to find out about the county council’s it holds up movement transport proposals for Cheltenham, Gloucester, Churchdown just won’t be on the key corridor adequate and Bishop’s Cleeve connecting Cheltenham and Gloucester with the south east and economic development This strategy acts as guidance for anybody requiring information regarding the county council’s priorities for transport within Urban centres Cheltenham, Gloucester, Churchdown and Bishop’s Cleeve. are places for people where People The document sets out the aspirations for the Central Severn Vale Connecting have more Places Strategy area up to 2031. pedestrians and cyclists should be transport a priority choice here Draft Local Transport Plan Area Summary Area Summary Places • Central Severn Vale constitutes the county’s major • Gloucester urban areas • Cheltenham • Approximately half the county’s population live in this area • Churchdown
[Show full text]