CONSERVATION SCORECARD SCORECARD CONSERVATION 2013-2014 1 DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE Staff and Board

ew Mexicans hold During the session, I was asked Conservation Voters long-standing shared by legislators time and time again, values for protecting our “How will this affect my CVNM Family of Organizations Nair, land, water, wildlife and the score?” Decision-makers pay health of our communities. At attention because they know that Conservation Voters New Mexico, CVNM and New Mexico voters CVNM Staff we strive to uphold these deep- are keeping track. Demis Foster, Executive Director rooted conservation values. We Victor Reyes, Political Director Scorecard Contents work hard to connect the people Help us keep the pressure on to Allison Fabara, Development Director of New Mexico to their political hold our lawmakers accountable. Thomas Lawley, Business Administrator power. We do this by mobilizing Tell your legislators that you Liliana Castillo, Communications Manager 3 CVNM Staff and Board voters, winning elections, holding “Know the Score.” If they have a 4 Highlights and Lowlight elected officials accountable, and strong conservation score, call or Demis Foster Victor Reyes CVNM Board of Directors 5 Know the Score, Take Action advancing responsible public email to thank them. If they have a Julia Catron, President 6 Issue Spotlight policies. low score, express your concern Kevin Hoover, Vice President 7 Conservation Champions as a constituent and Conservation Loyda Martinez, Secretary 8 Heroes and Zero One of the most powerful tools Voter. Contact information for Molly Schmidt Nowara, Treasurer 9 About the Scorecard we use to achieve this mission your legislators is on the last two Michael Casaus, Director 10 Governor: Foul Legacy is our annual Conservation pages of this Scorecard. Sarah Cottrell Propst, Director 12 Conservation Vote Descriptions Scorecard. The Scorecard is Jennifer Marshall Weydeveld, Director 15 2013-2014 Senate Scorecard a cornerstone of our work; it With your support we can realize Larry McDaniel, Director 17 2013-2014 House Scorecard provides the information you our vision for a New Mexico Allison Fabara Thomas Lawley Karen Mendenhall, Director 18 Legislative Contacts need to determine whether your where decision-makers and public legislators are voting in line with policies represent the conservation CVNM Education Fund Staff your conservation values. The values of our people. Consider Demis Foster, Executive Director Scorecard also reveals the behind- making a gift to CVNM today Allison Fabara, Development Director the-scenes stories of what happens by visiting our website at www. Thomas Lawley, Business Administrator during legislative sessions. CVNM.org. Together we can Molly Sanders, Program Director continue to win the fight to protect Talia Boyd, Western New Mexico Organizer A DECADE OF SUCCESS the air we breathe, the water Liliana Castillo, Communications Manager we drink and the health of our Molly Sanders Liliana Castillo Vicente Garcia, Latino Organizing Director For ten years in a row, CVNM communities. and our allies have defeated 100% CVNM Education Fund Board of Directors of the anti-conservation bills in Thank you for being a Jon Goldstein, President the Roundhouse. In the last two Conservation Voter! Bernard Ewell, Vice President sessions (the 51st Legislature), we Javier Benavidez, Secretary fought against a slew of bills that Michael Casaus, Treasurer would have stripped rules put in Cindy Padilla, Director place to protect our air, land, and water. These bills, and how your Talia Boyd Vicente Garcia legislators voted on them, are explored more in the following pages. Demis Foster Executive Director

2 3 “While I am a great believer in the free enterprise system and all that it entails, I am an even stronger believer in the right of our people to live in a clean and HIGHLIGHTS pollution-free environment.” -Barry Goldwater Know the Score Take Action and lowlight ach legislative session is legislative champions — especially All too often, votes are cast along It’s never too late to say ‘thanks’! Join Conservation Voters The most important part of your unique, and develops its own those in leadership positions, predictably partisan lines. To the (or ‘no thanks’…) New Mexico today! communication is letting them culture and character. The including committee chairs. As extent that there is crossover in Tell your legislators that you know that you are paying close E2013 and 2014 sessions were no always, we are grateful for their efforts. partisan support for, or opposition ‘Know the Score’ We take on tough fights to protect attention to how they vote or, in different. Here are a few highlights to, environmental safeguards, the New Mexico, but these efforts in the case of the Governor, what from each, along with one perpetual The 2013 session was remarkable crossover generally consists of more One of the best ways to the Roundhouse and around the actions she takes on legislation that lowlight. for the appearance of a new group conservative Democrats siding with influence the voting records state require financial resources. affects our air, land, and water. of champions elected for the Republicans against common-sense of your elected officials is to We can only win when we work HIGHLIGHTS first time in 2012: senators and protections. communicate regularly with them. together. Please join other Calling your legislator directly The 2014 session marked the representatives for whom protection If your legislators scored well, New Mexicans in becoming and sending letters through 10th year in a row that CVNM of our air, land and water is a key This is not the case in other state it’s important to thank them and a Conservation Voter today! regular mail remain by far and our allies have successfully priority. Reps. , capitols. In places as diverse to support them. If you feel you Membership is easy: just submit the most effective ways to defended against 100% of the Patricia Roybal Caballero, Liz as Idaho and South Carolina, weren’t well-represented by your the enclosed envelope with your communicate with your anti-conservation bills in the New Thomson and , Republicans have a strong legislators’ votes, it’s important to membership contribution or join legislators. Due to mass volume, Mexico legislature. It’s a remarkable and Sens. and Bill conservation ethic, and a number hold them accountable by letting online at www.CVNM.org and e-mail is generally a less effective accomplishment — one of which we Soules, are examples of this new of Republican legislators have them know what you think about click “Donate.” method to communicate your are very proud. cohort of champions — and there nearly-perfect environmental voting their votes. views — but it depends on the are several others as well. records. Communicate with the individual legislator. Here are just a few examples of If you don’t know who your Governor and your harmful measures we worked to The 2013 session also saw the One of the founders of the modern legislators are, visit www.CVNM.org Legislators The Governor and Lieutenant successfully defeat: welcome return of Reps. Jeff conservation movement was and click on the “Find your Governor can always be contacted at • In 2013, CVNM worked with Steinborn and Nate Cote from Doña President Teddy Roosevelt, and Legislator” link under the Whether you’re congratulating the Roundhouse. Except during the allies to help defeat measures that Ana County. Once again, both several other Republican presidents “Legislation” drop-down menu. your legislators on their score or legislative session, state legislators would have gutted our renewable legislators boasted perfect 100% — including Nixon and Coolidge expressing your disappointment, should be contacted in their home energy and efficiency standards, voting records! Sadly, 2014 was Rep. — supported sound conservation be direct, courteous and polite. districts, as listed on pages 18 and 19. immunized illegal or negligent Cote’s last session; he opted not to policies. Many Republican factory farms from legal action, run for re-election this year and he governors — most notably Tom weakened our water quality will be missed. McCall from Oregon, and our protections, and enabled the own Dave Cargo — have been at Conservation Goals Conservation Lobbying and for the Legislature Grassroots privatization of critical public lowlight the vanguard of environmental policy goals are are Evaluated and Mobilization services (e.g. water systems) Unfortunately, a few obstacles to protection. communicated to Prioritized without adequate safeguards, sound environmental policy are so CVNM legislators oversight or taxpayer protections. entrenched that clean air and water It begs the question: • In 2014, CVNM spearheaded for all New Mexicans — now and what happened? When will Cycle of Accountability opposition to a bill that would have in the future — seems an almost- Republican legislators embrace ELECTION LEGISLATIVE SESSION allowed polluting companies and impossible goal. their party’s conservation heritage? Public elects Legislature sprawl developments to negotiate When will clean air and water stop or rejects enacts or rejects subsidized utility rates — subsidies Although protecting the health of being fodder for partisan squabbles? candidates conservation paid for by working families, our communities and environment For the sake of our children and agenda schools, and smaller businesses. is important to New Mexicans grandchildren, we hope it will be across the entire political spectrum, soon. Campaign Assistance Legislative Results Our 100% record of defeating that same commitment is not and Grassroots Endorsement of Communicated to environmental rollbacks wouldn’t reflected by our elected officials in Mobilization Pro-Conservation the Public through be possible without our many the Roundhouse. Candidates the Scorecard

4 5 ISSUE SPOTLIGHT t times, the issues we don’t immediately 20 years for $1.5 billion. The result was that Current law allows for discounted rates when recognize as threats to New Mexico’s consumer complaints more than doubled, the utility has “excess capacity,” meaning that Aair, land, water and communities are inadequate safeguards by the company the utility can provide the energy required the most dangerous. These “unconventional” forced a boil-water advisory that closed for the new customer without any additional conservation issues dominated CVNM’s businesses and schools, and the company costs to the system. The bills removed the legislative work in the 2013 and 2014 sessions. was investigated by a federal grand jury for “excess capacity” requirement from current While a host of bills threatened the natural falsifying water quality reports. In the end, law, meaning other ratepayers — like resources we all depend on, there were two taxpayers had to pay millions of dollars to bail families, schools and small businesses — specific issues that CVNM prioritized because out the project. would be subsidizing energy use by polluting of their potential impacts on our air, land, and industries and sprawl development. The water. The challenge for New Mexico is to emulate key to sound environmental policy is the federal government, which is diligent in to stop encouraging bad behavior by These issues are public-private ensuring that P3s maximize public benefit incentivizing it. partnerships and economic development while minimizing risk, as private companies 100% Club utility rates. Unless laws governing both are pushing hard to expand P3s in our Moreover, low energy rates to a few chosen Senate: issues are carefully crafted, both public-private state. A bill was introduced in the 2013 heavy users can encourage waste. Public 100% partnerships and economic development session (HB 405, sponsored by Rep. Larrañaga policy should be focusing on promoting Cisco McSorley utility rates could have huge impacts on our and Sen. Keller) that was one of the broadest, more efficient energy use, which helps environment. if not the broadest, P3 legislation in the protect our environment. Efficiency keeps Bill O’Neill country — a very risky proposition. the future costs of energy down by reducing Both issues are complex and we delve further the need for expensive and environmentally into each on our website at CVNM and our allies worked hard to amend destructive new generating capacity. New Michael Sanchez CVNM.org/Scorecard. the bill to address these concerns and craft a capacity leads to rate hikes. compromise that protected public health and What the heck is a P3? safety. Unfortunately, we couldn’t reach an Thankfully, CVNM recognized the problems House: “Public-private partnership” (PPP or P3) is a acceptable solution. We were forced to oppose with the bill from day one and began catch-all term for any project that partners it and the bill was defeated. spreading the word. In a fateful three-hour government with private business. Types of P3 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, four Nate Cote projects differ widely, ranging from a company This is what your legislators senators signed the bill’s death warrant. You Stephen Easley* designing and constructing a new school, to were talking about for the last can read more about this in our Heroes & Zero a government contracting with a company to piece on page 8. operate and maintain a road or a water utility. week of the 2014 legislative session If the legislature can craft a narrow, prudent Miguel Garcia Across the country, P3s are an increasingly As presented in the 2014 session, HB 296 and approach to P3s and economic development Georgene Louis popular policy tool as governments are finding SB 283 Economic Development Utility Rates utility rates that will provide opportunities they don’t have sufficient resources to build (sponsored by Rep. and Sen. for public benefit without posing substantial Patricia Roybal Caballero the infrastructure they want or need. ) would shift costs for economic financial, social or environmental risks, CVNM development utility expansion (such as sprawl will be pleased to support them. Generally speaking, the more heavily the development) to other ratepayers. Utility CHAMPIONS private sector is involved, the riskier the companies would negotiate discounted utility However, if any proposed P3 or economic *Despite his passing, Rep. Easley is listed here to honor his commitment to conservation project is for the public — in financial, rates to attract big businesses to New Mexico. development utility legislation lacks sufficient social and environmental terms. Examples Then, the utilities would be allowed to safeguards to protect the public, we’ll work from across the country have proven the need increase utility rates for families and hard to defeat it, just as we did in the recent to take a very cautious approach to P3s. small businesses to make up for the sessions — and we’ll urge you to ask your discount —without the oversight of the senator and representative to do the same. A company was contracted to operate and Public Regulation Commission (PRC), the maintain the water utility in Indianapolis for entity that regulates utilities in New Mexico. 6 7 Heroes & Zero About the Scorecard

Champion Chairs Wirth & Egolf Zero Conservation Voters New Mexico’s 2013- itself. In others, a procedural motion is the they are recorded as ‘absent’ (a). Unexcused Our deepest appreciation goes to Sen. Peter Wirth (Senate Conservation Sen. has the dubious 2014 Conservation Scorecard provides only public indication of a legislator’s position absenses are calculated in the legislator’s score Committee) and Rep. Brian Egolf (House Energy & Natural Resources distinction of being the only objective, non-partisan information about the on a measure. In all cases, the actual vote as an anti-conservation vote. Committee). Passionate and thoughtful committee leadership is critical to legislator to score 0% during the conservation voting records of all members of included in the Scorecard is detailed in the vote ensuring that proposed measures are subject to a rigorous but fair review 51st Legislature (2013-2014). the 51st Legislature of the State of New Mexico. description. Wherever possible, the votes included in the by committee staff, analysts and members — not to mention advocates Scorecards are a clear and comprehensive way Scorecard were taken on the floor of the House and the public. Sen. Wirth and Rep. Egolf are examples of that kind of for you to see how you are being represented We encourage you to read the descriptions or Senate, where every legislator’s position leadership. on issues that matter to you. of each vote to determine how well your can be represented. However, some of the legislators represented you on the issues and most important actions are taken in legislative Clean Water Hero Vote Selection bills that are most important to you. committees on measures that never reach the Cue another round of applause for Rep. Debbie Rodella, Chair of the Each vote was selected solely on the basis floor. In these cases, CVNM has presented the House Business & Industry Committee (HBIC). HBIC has traditionally of the conservation values embodied in the CVNM Priority Votes relevant committee votes, and the positions of been quite hostile to environmental concerns. Rep. Rodella went to the legislation. In preparing this Scorecard, we Let’s face it: not all votes are equal. Some votes legislators who do not serve on those particular mat in the 2013 session to defend the Water Quality Control Commission sought input from legislative and conservation are more critical than others, either because committees are not indicated. (WQCC) and keep it from expiring. You can read more about the fight leaders; however, responsibility for the of the issues at stake or the personal courage to save the WQCC at CVNM.org/Scorecard, but the upshot is that the final set of selected votes rests entirely with required of legislators who take the pro- If the sponsor of a measure does not serve on commission would no longer exist were it not for the heroic efforts of Conservation Voters New Mexico (CVNM). conservation position. Here, we try to represent a committee for which a vote is being scored, Rep. Rodella. Thank you! the most critical measures by classifying them their sponsorship is considered representative Thousands of votes are taken during a as “priority” votes, with this symbol : ! . The of their position, and is recorded with a ‘+’ or Sound Policy Heroes legislative session in New Mexico. Many value of these priority votes is doubled in the ‘-’, as appropriate. If a legislator was excused A bi-partisan group of legislators sounded the alarm about Senate Bill of these votes represent overwhelming Scorecard in priority. from the vote included in the Scorecard, but 283 and House Bill 296 in the 2014 session. The bills would have allowed agreement on non-controversial issues or previously cast a vote on the measure—in utility companies to negotiate discounted rates for large companies, and amendments. To provide better insight into Recording the Votes committee, for example—their prior position pass those costs onto working families and small businesses — without the various positions of our legislators, CVNM If a legislator voted in support of the pro- is recorded in the Scorecard, as long as the vote oversight by the Public Regulation Commission or reasonable limits. tends to select measures that illustrate the conservation position, his or her vote is is substantially the same. key debates and fierce disagreement over recorded on the chart as ‘+’; votes against the Rep. Donald Bratton spoke out against the House Bill in its only conservation policy in the state. conservation position are indicated with ‘-’. If committee hearing. As the minority floor leader, Bratton’s words carried a legislator was excused from voting, this is weight, and were one of the main reasons the bill received as much CVNM selected the most critical votes on noted by an ‘e’, and the vote does not count scrutiny and dissenting votes as it did on the House floor. Then, in a long each issue. In some cases, a vote on an positively or negatively towards their final hearing late one Saturday night, Senate Judiciary Committee members amendment to a bill or a procedural motion score. If a legislator was not excused from analyzed virtually every line of SB 283. Sens. Joe Cervantes, Peter Wirth, was more important than voting on the bill voting but chose not to vote, Michael Sanchez and Cisco McSorley asked tough questions at a critical time and put the brakes on a measure that was flying through the process. These legislators stood up for all New Mexicans, sound policy and good government. How to Read the Scorecard

Champion for Effective Leadership Legislator’s 2013-14 Lifetime After Gov. Martinez nominated demonstrably anti-environmental District Number Score Score Anti-Conservation Vote Pro-Conservation Vote attorney Ryan Flynn as Secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department, Sen. Jacob Candelaria led the charge during the Senate 28 Smith , Joe (R) 79% 86% e - + + + e + Rules Committee’s confirmation hearing to shine a light on unethical 34 Martinez, Maria (D) 32% 20% - - + a - + - practices and conflicts of interest that make Mr. Flynn an extremely poor choice for such a critical post. Legislator’s Party Excused absence. Unexcused absence. Legislator did not cast a Affiliation Not calculated in the Calculated in the legislator’s vote on this measure. legislator’s score. score as an anti-conservation vote. 8 9 Foul Legacy: Susana Martinez and the Politics of Pollution Grade: F

Governance lthough Susana Martinez Water Energy The efforts of Governor Martinez to weaken environmental protections go far ran for Governor In a water-scarce state, we simply Sadly, the story is the same when beyond rewriting rules and opposing common-sense legislation. They pervade claiming to be a moderate can’t afford to risk contamination of it comes to energy and climate. every aspect of the culture and governance of environmental agencies. Some Awho shared the values of New any of our precious water. Susana Martinez routinely chooses examples: Mexicans about the importance of Martinez doesn’t seem to care the private profits of corporate safeguarding our water and natural about that, as demonstrated by her campaign contributors over clean • Scientific and technical expertise is shunned. Scientists who are the leading resources, her record has proven decisions to: air for our children to breathe, and experts in their field are summarily re-assigned to departments with which they otherwise. • Gut the “Pit Rule” that governed tackling the climate change that is have little to no experience—leaving many agency functions without capable the management of dangerous already exacerbating drought and representation. Moreover, boards and commissions have been stripped of most of In stark but accurate terms: waste from oil and gas operations. the devastating wildfires in New their technical expertise—replaced by political appointees with no education or Governor Martinez has repeatedly Now, New Mexico will be home to Mexico. experience in the issues they are regulating. and aggressively championed vast artificial lakes of toxic fracking Among other actions, Martinez: • Willful disregard for the law. In addition to writing new rules that violate state polluting industries at the expense fluids. • Repealed a rule that would have environmental laws (for example, the “copper rules”), the Martinez administration of the health and safety of New • Weaken the “dairy rule” that reduced New Mexico’s carbon has seen many of its decisions reversed by the courts, because of failure to comply Mexicans. protected groundwater from pollution. with the law. One example is the unlawful decision by Martinez not to publish contamination by manure lagoons. • Reversed green building codes rules that she didn’t agree with—even though the rules were duly adopted before In fact, there aren’t enough pages in • Allow copper mining companies that would have required greater she took office. Another is her administration’s nasty habit of weakening or this entire Scorecard to fully recount wide latitude to pollute our energy efficiency. reversing rules without following the legal requirements to do so. the litany of actions the Martinez groundwater, setting a legal • Opposed the U.S. Environmental • Enforcement is virtually non-existent. For a career prosecutor, one might administration has taken that precedent for other industries to Protection Agency’s plan to clean imagine that Martinez might at least prove vigilant about enforcing existing laws. jeopardize our air, land and water. do the same. up the air surrounding San Juan On the contrary, enforcement actions—such as fines and penalties for violations— But we’ll do our best to highlight a • Vehemently oppose a bill that Generating Station, a coal-fired are down dramatically from prior administrations. In some cases, where Martinez few. would have allowed the state to power plant. doesn’t like the law, the simplest solution is not to enforce it. Naturally, her recover damages from polluters • Nominated climate science administration then aggressively opposed a legislative measure that would have who contaminate groundwater. denier Harrison Schmitt to be her allowed New Mexicans to protect their health, safety and property by pursuing Secretary of the Energy, Minerals environmental enforcement when the state failed to do its job. & Natural Resources Department (He withdrew from the position When it comes to safeguarding our air and water, it is difficult to imagine a after several weeks on the job). governor with a more atrocious record than Susana Martinez. For most New Mexicans, protecting the air we breathe and the water we drink is paramount. For Martinez, those goals conflict with the profits of her corporate backers, and she’s made her choice: profits over people. Every time.

10 11 HB 652/SB 194, 2013 (Dodge; SB 193, 2013 (Griego): Water SM 47, 2014 (Griggs): Study Conservation Vote Descriptions Griego): No Agriculture as a Quality Control Commissioners Transfer of Federal Lands to ENERGY & Nuisance took defense of unlawful would have dramatically weakened State requested that state agencies polluters to the extreme by the WQCC by altering the study the possibility of transferring CLIMATE CHANGE exempting illegal, improper, and composition of the committee— federal public lands to state control HB 266, 2013 (Strickler): SJM 26, 2013 (Sapien): Study negligent agricultural operations removing much of the health and -- a waste of time and resources, Renewable Energy Procurement Exporting Coal sought to offset from nuisance laws. technical expertise, and stacking since any such land transfers are Limits would have weakened the environmental gains of reduced DEFEATED in both the House and it towards polluting industries. unconstitutional. DEFEATED in the the state’s renewable portfolio reliance on coal here in the US the Senate. DEFEATED in the Senate. Senate. standard (RPS) by distorting the by promoting the export of coal Conservation Vote: No Conservation Vote: No Conservation Vote: No calculation of the cost limitations — with all of its associated public Votes weighted 2x by CVNM Votes weighted 2x by CVNM for utilities complying with the renewable energy requirement. health and environmental damages As it is, New Mexico is behind in — to Asia. WATER SB 479, 2013 (Wirth): Adequate meeting our RPS targets; HB 266 DEFEATED in the Senate. HB 259, 2013 (Kane): Recover Subdivision Water Supplies, and would have made the situation Conservation Vote: No Damages for Natural Resource SB 480, 2013 (Wirth): Subdivision worse. DEFEATED in the House. Injuries would have allowed the Water Permits Conservation Vote: No ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE state to sue polluters and recover Together, these bills strengthened Votes weighted 2x by CVNM HB 343, 2014 (Louis): Community damages for contamination of the state’s ability to manage our Health Study Fund would have groundwater and other resources. scarce water supplies by requiring HB 286, 2013 (Chasey/M Sanchez): established a mechanism and DEFEATED in the House. large subdivisions to demonstrate Oil & Gas Financial Assurance funding source to conduct baseline Conservation Vote: Yes access to a sustainable water supply would have modernized our oil and studies of the community health Votes weighted 2x by CVNM that won’t impair other water users. gas laws by bringing New Mexico’s impacts of uranium mining. Both measures PASSED and were fines and penalties for violations — DEFEATED in the House. SB 89, 2014 (Wirth): Unit Fund signed by the Governor. last updated in 1935 — in line with Conservation vote: Yes for Certain Water Supply Needs Conservation Vote: Yes surrounding states like Texas and Votes weighted 2x by CVNM would have required the state to Arizona. focus $82 million in federal funding WILDLIFE & HABITAT DEFEATED in the House. HB 429, 2013 (Louis): on projects like water conservation, CONSERVATION Conservation Vote: Yes Environmental Private Right watershed improvement, and new HB 292/SB 404, 2013 (Herrell/ Votes weighted 2x by CVNM of Action would have allowed infrastructure to help meet water RC Martinez; Woods): Transfer New Mexicans affected by illegal demands in southwestern New of Public Land Act would have HB 296/SB 283, 2014 (Maestas; pollution to seek court action to Mexico—instead of a large-scale violated the US Constitution by Ingle): Economic Development stop the pollution, if the state is diversion project on the Gila River, attempting to transfer oversight Utility Rates would have shifted failing to fulfill its responsibilities to the last free-flowing river in the of federal public lands to the state. costs for economic development enforce existing laws. state. DEFEATED in the Senate. DEFEATED in both the House and utility expansion — such as sprawl DEFEATED in the House. Conservation Vote: Yes the Senate. development or polluting industries Conservation Vote: Yes Conservation Vote: No — to New Mexico’s families, Votes weighted 2x by CVNM Amendment to SB 163, 2013 Votes weighted 2x by CVNM schools and small businesses. For (Gentry/Griego) was an attempt on more information on economic HB 458, 2013 (Chasey): both the House and Senate floors to HM 21, 2013 (Ezzell): Preserve development utility rates, please see Consolidated Environmental eliminate the Water Quality Control Prairie Chicken to Oppose Listing our Issue Spotlight on page 6. Review Act would have established Commission (WQCC)—the only opposed the protection of the Both measures DEFEATED in the a state environmental review entity in New Mexico authorized to Lesser Prairie Chicken under the Senate. process for projects approved or set water quality standards, or adopt Endangered Species Act. Conservation vote: No funded by the state. rules under the Clean Water Act. PASSED the House. Votes weighted 2x by CVNM DEFEATED in the House. DEFEATED in both the House and Conservation Vote: No Conservation Vote: Yes the Senate. Votes weighted 2x by CVNM Conservation Vote: No Votes weighted 2x by CVNM 12 13 2013-2014

Conservation Vote Descriptions Continued

EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT SB 315, 2013 (O’Neill): City or & Energy Change Climate Environmental Justice Water Wildlife Effective Government !!!! !! ! HB 40, 2013 (Cook/Keller): County Comprehensive Plans Designation of Benefit provided local governments Corporations would have allowed with some structure for the

corporations to voluntarily comprehensive planning process, District Senator 2013-2014 LIFETIME SB 283 SJM 26 SB 194 SB 163 SB 193 SB 479 SB 480 SB 89 SB 404/HB 292 SM 47 SB 273 SB 315 HB 40 Flynn designate themselves as “benefit and clarified the role of planning 19 Beffort, Sue Wilson (R) 50% 37% a + + + + - corporations,” enabling them to commissions in crafting, approving 40 Brandt, Craig (R) 25% 25% - + - + - - pursue societal and environmental and implementing their plans. 33 Burt, William (R) 38% 26% - + - + + - benefits in addition to financial PASSED both chambers but was 8 Campos, Pete (D) 75% 69% + + + + + - SENATE SCORECARD profits. vetoed by Gov. Martinez. 26 Candelaria, Jacob (D) 83% 83% - + + + + + + - + PASSED both chambers but vetoed Conservation Vote: Yes 31 Cervantes, Joseph (D) 67% 74% + - - + + a + + + + + - by Gov. Martinez. Conservation Vote: Yes 6 Cisneros, Carlos (D) 75% 78% + + + + + - Confirmation of Ryan Flynn as 36 Cotter, Lee (R) 0% 0% ------Secretary of the Environment 39 Griego, Phil (D) 21% 48% - - - - - + + - - - - + - HB 405, 2013 (Larrañaga/Keller): Department, 2014. Prior to 34 Griggs, Ron (R) 40% 40% - - - + + - + + + - Public-Private Partnerships Act serving as General Counsel and 27 Ingle, Stuart (R) 22% 23% - e - e + - e + e - would have facilitated private then Secretary of New Mexico 15 Ivey-Soto, Daniel (D) 67% 67% - + - + + - + + + control of projects that are Environment Department, Ryan 17 Keller, Timothy (D) 83% 85% + + + + - + + + most appropriately operated by Flynn was an attorney at a law firm 42 Kernan, Gay (R) 25% 23% --- + + - accountable public entities (e.g. representing polluting industries. 41 Leavell, Carroll (R) 13% 21% --- - + - water treatment plants, utility Perhaps it’s not surprising that 11 Lopez, Linda (D) 94% 86% e - + + + + + + + + + + infrastructure, dams, reservoirs, in his current role, Flynn has 5 Martinez, Richard (D) 44% 61% - - - + + + - + - + + - etc.). For more information on shown a flagrant disregard for best 16 McSorley, Cisco (D) 100% 99% + + + + + + + + + public-private partnerships, please practices, competent management, 21 Moores, Mark (R) 13% 13% - - - - + + ----- see our Issue Spotlight on page 6. transparency and the rule of law. 28 Morales, Howie (D) 75% 71% + + + + + - DEFEATED in the Senate. Conservation Vote: No 4 Munoz, George (D) 50% 46% + - - + + - Conservation Vote: No Votes weighted 2x by CVNM 2 Neville, Steven (R) 38% 30% - + + - + - Votes weighted 2x by CVNM 13 O’Neill, Bill (D) 100% 98% + + + + + + 12 Ortiz y Pino, Gerald (D) 75% 90% + + + + a + + + - SB 273 , 2013 (Keller/Cook): 14 Padilla, Michael (D) 67% 67% - + + + - + + + Transportation Public-Private 38 Papen, Mary Kay (D) 36% 45% - + e + - + - - Partnerships would have 20 Payne, William (R) 33% 23% - - - - + + - - + + + - authorized the privatization of 3 Pinto, John (D) 60% 70% + e + e e a transportation facilities that are 32 Pirtle, Cliff (R) 8% 8% - - - + - ---- most appropriately developed and 24 Rodriguez, Nancy (D) 100% 88% + e + + + + maintained by public entities. For 23 Rue, Sander (R) 25% 28% -- - - + + - - + + - more information on public-private 10 Ryan, John (R) 17% 32% - - - - + - - - - + + - partnerships, please see our Issue 30 Sanchez, Clemente (D) 56% 56% - - + + + + + - + + - Spotlight on page 6. 29 Sanchez, Michael (D) 100% 94% + e + + + + + e + + + + DEFEATED in the Senate. 9 Sapien, John (D) 62% 65% - - + + + + + + - Conservation Vote: No 1 Sharer, William (R) 17% 18% - - - - + + - - - - + - Votes weighted 2x by CVNM 22 Shendo, Jr., Benny (D) 64% 64% - - + + + + + + + - 35 Smith, John Arthur (D) 25% 36% - + - - + - 37 Soules, Bill (D) 93% 93% - + + + + + + + + + 18 Torraco, Lisa (R) 29% 29% - - - + + - + + - 25 Wirth, Peter (D) 100% 99% + + + + + + + + + + + + 7 Woods, Pat (R) 21% 21% - - - + + - - - + - 14 15 16 54 2 ozls oet Bby D 1 5 - + - + + + e - + - + + 75% 61% Gonzales, Roberto “Bobby” (D) 42 0Gentry, Nate (R) 30 4Garcia, Miguel(D) 14 4Gri,Mr ee D 1 8 - - a 58% 21% Helen (D) Garcia, Mary 34 3Gri ihr,Sehne()7%7%+-+ - + 79% 79% Garcia Richard, Stephanie (D) 43 2 algs oen()5%5%+-+-+a+-+e+ e + - + a + - + - + 59% 59% Gallegos, Doreen (D) 52 1Gallegos, David (R) 61 Fajardo, Kelly (R) 7 8Ezl,CnySec R 5 3 - + - + + ------23% 15% Ezzell, (R) CandySpence 58 9 Espinoza, Nora (R) 59 7Egolf, Brian(D) 47 3Dodge, George (D) 63 4Crook, Anna(R) 64 6Lus eree()10 0%++++ + + + 100% 100% Louis, Georgene (D) 26 3Cote, Nate (D) 53 60 56 Cook, Zachary (R) Cook, Zachary 56 lhhshlig,Sao R 4 4 - - - 14% 14% Clahchischilliage, Sharon (R) 4 7Lraaa ar R 7 0 - + - - + + - - - - - 30% 17% (R) Larrañaga, Larry 27 2Chavez, Ernest (D) 12 8Chasey, (D) Gail 18 5Kane,Emily (D) 15 5Bon ahyn()1%1%---e-+---+- + - - - + - e - - - 19% 13% Brown, (R) Cathrynn 55 Jeff,Sandra (D) 5 2Bratton, (R) Donald 62 32 Irwin, Dona (D) Dona Irwin, 32 Bandy, Paul (R) 3 51 Bloao lno()6 7 - - - - 17% 6% Baldonado, Alonzo (R) 8 7Harper, Jason(R) 57 8Hmlo,Dan ilr()1%3%-a- a - 30% 14% Hamilton, Miller(R) Dianne 38 6Acuea hli D 5 5 - + + + + + + - + e + 75% 75% Archuleta, Phillip(D) 36 8Hall, Jimmie(R) 28 29 2013-2014 HOUSE + SCORECARD - + 74% 86% Alcon, Eliseo Lee (D) 6 District Gray,William “Bill”(R) Lewis,(R) Tim Herrell, Yvette(R) Anderson, Thomas (R) Anderson, Thomas Representative 0%9%+++ + + 95% 100% 0%10 + + + + + + + + + + + + 100% 100% 0%9%+++ + + 93% 100% 0%9%+ + + + +* 93% 100% 0 1 - 21% 20% 1 1 - + - 21% 21% 4 1 - a - 21% 14% 6 2 - + - - + + + - - e e 52% 36% 4 8 - - - 28% 14% 0 4 - + - - + ------24% 10% 3 8 + e + 68% 83% 0 0 + + - + 80% 80% 8 8 - + - + + + a - - - - 48% 28% 0 2 - + - - + - - - - + - - 22% 20% 7 9 - + - - + + a - - - - 39% 17% 9 3 - + - 33% 29% 1 1 - - - 21% 21% %1%------13% 6% %6 - - - - 6% 6% %2%---e-----+- + - - - - - e - - - 20% 6% %1%-a-- - a - 14% 6% 7% %2%--- - - 21% 7% 2013-2014

32% LIFETIME

! ! ! ! ! HB ! 266 ! ! ! Energy & Climate Change - - - - + - - + - - - - + - HB 286

HB 296

HB 343 Environmental Justice HB 429

HB 458

HB 652

- + + + + + + + HB 259 Water + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + e + + + + - + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + - + - + + a - + - - + a - + ------+ - - - - - + ------+ - - + - - + - - + - - + - a + - - - - + + - - + ------+ ------+ - + + - - + - - - - - + - - - - SB 163

SB 479

SB 480

HB 292/SB 404 ! Wildlife & Habitat HM 21 Conservation HB 40 Effective Government HB 405 ! Key to Readingthe Scorecard on page9. **Rep. Perea was recently appointed, sufficient anddidnotcast votes fora score tobefairly awarded. * Rep. Chasey sponsored HB286,andchampioneditpassionately. a Shecast “no” vote onthe floor to preserve theoptionof reconsidering thebill at a later time, inthehopesthat it could passthe House floor. 9Tripp, (R) Don 49 4Tosn lzbt D 4 4 + + + + 94% 94% Thomson, Elizabeth (D) 24 1 Strickler, James(R) 2 1 Stewart, Mimi(D) 21 5Steinborn, Jeff(D) 35 9 tpeo,Sey ilas()7%7%+++ + + 72% 79% Stapleton,Williams Sheryl (D) 19 22 Smith, James(R) Smith, 22 7Snoa,Ewr D 1 6 + - + 76% 71% Sandoval, Edward (D) 17 70 0Salazar, Nick(D) 40 0Saer,HnyKk D 0 6 + - - 56% 50% Kiki (D) Saavedra, Henry 10 3Rya aalr,Ptii D 0%10 + + + 100% 100% Roybal Caballero, Patricia (D) 13 41 Rodella, Debbie (D) Rodella,Debbie 41 67 Roch, Dennis (R) Roch,Dennis 67 31 50 4Pwrl-ubr,Jn R 4 8 - - - 18% 14% Powdrell-Culbert, Jane(R) 44 3 Pacheco, Paul (R) 23 11 Miera, Rick (D) Miera, Rick 11 37 8Yuglo,Mnc R %7 - - - 7% 7% Youngblood, (R) Monica 68 3McCamley, Bill(D) 33 6Wooley, (R) Bob 66 9Mrie,W e D 6 6 + - + 86% 86% Martinez, W. Ken (D) 69 0White, James(R) 20 39 8Vrl,Lcao“uk”()8%8%+-e+ e - + 88% 86% Varela, Luciano “Lucky” (D) 48 6Mets noi Me D 1 1 + - + 81% 71% Maestas, Antonio “Moe” (D) 16 5Trujillo, Jim(D) 45 5Tuil,Crsie()8%8%+++ + + 86% 86% Trujillo, Christine (D) 25 6Trujillo 46 5Mdln,JmsRgr()7%7%++-++--+++++++ + + + + + + - - + + - + + 72% 75% JamesRoger(D) Madalena, 65 udto,Ptii D 8 5 + - + 65% 58% Lundstrom, Patricia (D) 9 District Taylor,(R) Thomas Salazar, Tomás(D) Rehm, William “Bill”(R) Rehm, Perea,(R) Vickie McMillan, Terry(R) Martinez, , “Rudy” (D) Representative , Carl(D ) 0%9%+++ + + 99% 100% 0%9%++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + 97% 100% */ **n/a **n/a 2 1 - - + - 31% 22% 4 0 - - - 20% 14% 4 4 + - + 64% 64% 7 6 + + - + 66% 67% 3 8 + + + 68% 93% 1 1 - - - 21% 21% 6 2 + - + 92% 86% 1 6 a - - - 16% 11% 0 0 + + + + + + + + - - + + 80% 80% 1 5 - + a - - + - - - - - 25% 11% 4 6 - - - 26% 14% 8 6 + + - + 76% 78% 0 4 a - + 64% 50% 7 7 a - + 57% 57% %1%------+- + ------15% 5% %1%--- - - 19% 7% %2%--- - - 24% 7% %3%--- - - 35% 7% 2013-2014

LIFETIME

! ! ! ! ! HB ! 266 ! ! ! Energy & Climate Change HB 286

- HB 296

HB 343 Environmental Justice HB 429

HB 458

HB 652

HB 259 Water + - + + + + + + + + + + + - + a + + + - + + + + + - + + + a + - + - + a + + - + - + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + a + + + + + - + - + + + - + + + + + - + + + + + - + - - - a + + + + + + e - + + a + e - + - - + - - + - - - - - + - - - - - + - a + - - + - + + - - + - - - + - - + - - - - - + - - + - - + - - - + - SB 163

SB 479

SB 480

HB 292/SB 404 ! Wildlife & Habitat HM 21 Conservation HB 40 Effective Government HB 405 ! 17 Governor Susana Martinez Office of the Governor Chasey, Gail (D – 18) Garcia, Mary Helen (D – 34) Larrañaga, Larry A. (R – 27) Powdrell-Culbert, Jane E. (R – 44) Strickler, James R.J. (R – 2) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 490 Old Santa Fe Trail, Room 400 1206 Las Lomas Rd. NE 5271 State Hwy. 28 7716 Lamplighter NE Box 2819 2204 N. Santiago Ave. Santa Fe, NM 87501 Albuquerque, NM 87106 Las Cruces, NM 88005 Albuquerque, NM 87109 Corrales, NM 87048 Farmington, NM 87401 505-266-5191 / 505-246-2221 575-526-2726 505-821-4948 505-721-9021 505-327-4190 / 505-327-9240 505-476-2200 Legislative Contact Information Chavez, Ernest H. (D – 12) Garcia, Miguel P. (D – 14) Lewis, Tim D. (R – 60) Rehm, William “Bill” R. (R – 31) Taylor, Thomas C. (R – 1) State Legislators [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] During legislative sessions (January to March in odd-numbered years; January and February in even-numbered 1531 Severo Rd. SW 1118 La Font Rd. SW Box 45793 Box 14768 5909 Rinconada Albuquerque, NM 87105 Albuquerque, NM 87105 Rio Rancho, NM 87174 Albuquerque, NM 87191 Farmington, NM 87402 years), your state senators and representatives can be contacted at the State Capitol, Santa Fe, NM 87501 or by 505-877-5416 505- 877-8131 505-259-3398 505-325-9828/505-320-0306 phone at 505-986-4300. Louis, Georgene (D – 26) Clahchischilliage, Sharon (R – 4) Garcia Richard, Stephanie (D – 43) [email protected] Roch, Dennis J. (R – 67) Thomson, Elizabeth “Liz” (D – 24) Outside the legislative sessions, legislators can be contacted in their home districts: [email protected] [email protected] Box 72123 [email protected] [email protected] Box 585 Box 4657 Albuquerque, NM 87195 Box 477 1216 Westerfeld Dr. NE SENATE Kirtland, NM 87417 Los Alamos, NM 87544 505-250-7932 / 505-938-9144 Logan, NM 88426 Albuquerque, NM 87112 505-686-0836 / 505-258-4342 505-672-4196 / 505-500-4343 575-799-7796 505-239-1781 Beffort, Sue Wilson (R – 19) Ingle, Stuart (R – 27) Muñoz, George K. (D – 4) Rue, Sander (R – 23) Wirth, Peter (D – 25) Lundstrom, Patricia A. (D – 9) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Cook, Zachary J. (R – 56) Gentry, Nate (R -30) [email protected] Rodella, Debbie A. (D – 41) Tripp, Don L. (R – 49) 67 Raindance Rd. 2106 W. University Dr. Box 2679 7500 Rancho Solano Ct. NW 708 Paseo de Peralta [email protected] [email protected] 3406 Bluehill Ave. [email protected] [email protected] Sandia Park, NM 87047 Portales, NM 88130 Gallup, NM 87305 Albuquerque, NM 87120 Santa Fe, NM 87501 1703 Sudderth Dr. #425 3716 Andrew Dr. NE Gallup, NM 87301 16 Private Dr. 1156 Box 1369 505-292-7116 575-356-3088 505-722-0191 / 505-722-6570 505-899-0288 505-989-8667 / 505-988-1668 Ruidoso, NM 88345 Albuquerque, NM 87110 505-863-0098 / 505-722-2980 Española, NM 87532 Socorro, NM 87801 575-257-0660 / 575-937-7644 505-508-0782 505-753-8247 575-835-0766 / 575-835-2465 Brandt, Craig W. (R – 40) Ivey-Soto, Daniel A. (D – 15) Neville, Steven P. (R – 2) Ryan, John C. (R – 10) Woods, Pat (R – 7) Madalena, James Roger (D – 65) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Cote, Nathan “Nate” (D – 53) Gonzales, Roberto “Bobby” (D – 42) [email protected] Roybal Caballero, Patricia (D – 13) Trujillo, Carl (D – 46) 7012 Tampico Rd. NE 1420 Carlisle Blvd. NE Ste. 208 Box 1570 5000 Los Poblanos Lane NW 4000 C.R. M [email protected] [email protected] 373 Buffalo Hill Rd. [email protected] [email protected] Rio Rancho, NM 87144 Albuquerque, NM 87110 Aztec, NM 87410 Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM 87107 Broadview, NM 88112 Box 537 6193 NDCBU Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 Box 72574 11 W. Gutierrez St. #3212 505-503-5001 505-881-4475 505-327-5460 505-238-3733 575-357-8594 Organ, NM 88052 Taos, NM 87571 575-834-7005 Albuquerque, NM 87195 Santa Fe, NM 87506 575-202-1872 575-758-2674 / 505-751-1467 505-710-5996 505-699-6690 Burt, William F. (R – 33) Keller, Timothy M. (D – 17) O’Neill, Bill B. (D – 13) Sanchez, Clemente (D – 30) Maestas, Antonio “Moe” (D – 16) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] HOUSE Crook, Anna M. (R – 64) Gray, William “Bill” (R – 54) [email protected] Saavedra, Henry Kiki (D – 10) Trujillo, Christine (D – 25) Box 1848 11023 Vistazo Pl. SE 343 Sarah Ln. NW 612 Inwood Ave. [email protected] [email protected] 544 61st St. NW 2838 2nd St. SW [email protected] Alamogordo, NM 88311 Albuquerque, NM 87123 Albuquerque, NM 87114 Grants, NM 87020 Alcon, Eliseo Lee (D – 6) 1041 Fairway Terrace 1503 W. Dallas Ave. Albuquerque, NM 87105 Albuquerque, NM 87102 1923 Madeira Dr. NE 575-434-6140 / 575-434-1414 505-332-9441 505-450-9263 505-287-2515 [email protected] Clovis, NM 88101 Artesia, NM 88210 505-242-2279 505-350-0486 Albuquerque, NM 87110 Box 2134 575-763-4108 575-365-6130 / 575-746-2849 505-503-8600 Campos, Pete (D – 8) Kernan, Gay G. (R – 42) Ortiz y Pino, Gerald (D – 12) Sanchez, Michael S. (D – 29) Milan, NM 87021 Martinez, Rodolpho “Rudy” S. (D – 39) Salazar, Nick L. (D – 40) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 505-285-6387 Dodge, George (D – 63) Hall, Jimmie C. (R – 28) [email protected] Box 1076 Trujillo, Jim R. (D – 45) 418 Raynolds Ave. 928 W. Mesa Verde 400 12th St. NW 3 Bunton Rd. [email protected] [email protected] Box 164 Ohkay Owingeh, NM 87566 [email protected] Las Vegas, NM 87701 Hobbs, NM 88240 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Belen, NM 87002 Anderson, Thomas A. (R – 29) Box 316 13008 Gray Hills Rd. NE Bayard, NM 88023 505-852-4178 / 505-663-5849 1901 Morris Pl. 505-425-0508 / 505-454-2501 505-629-8081 505-243-1509 505-865-5583 / 505-865-0688 [email protected] Santa Rosa, NM 88435 Albuquerque, NM 87111 575-537-8609 / 575-537-3105 Santa Fe, NM 87505 10013 Plunkett Dr. NW 575-472-3798 / 575-472-5576 505-294-6178 Salazar, Tomás E. (D – 70) 505-438-8890 Candelaria, Jacob R. (D – 26) Leavell, Carroll H. (R – 41) Padilla, Michael (D – 14) Sapien, John M. (D – 9) Albuquerque, NM 87114 Martinez, W. Ken (D – 69) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 505-897-2593 Egolf, Brian F. (D – 47) Hamilton, Dianne Miller (R – 38) [email protected] Box 66 Varela, Luciano “Lucky” (D – 48) 3501 Atrisco Dr. NW #423 Drawer D Box 67545 1600 W. Ella [email protected] [email protected] Box 730 Las Vegas, NM 87701 [email protected] Albuquerque, NM 87120 Jal, NM 88252 Albuquerque, NM 87193 Corrales, NM 87048 Archuleta, Phillip M. (D – 36) 128 Grant Ave. Ste. 301 4132 N. Gold St. Grants, NM 87020 575-421-2455 1709 Callejon Zenaida 505-847-5079 575-395-3154 / 575-393-2550 505-977-6247 505-765-5662 phillip.archuleta@nmlegis. Santa Fe, NM 87501 Silver City, NM 88061 505-986-4776 / 505-287-8801 Santa Fe, NM 87501 gov 505-986-9641 575-538-9336 Sandoval, Edward C. (D – 17) 505-982-1292 Cervantes, Joseph (D – 31) Lopez, Linda M. (D – 11) Papen, Mary Kay (D – 38) Sharer, William E. (R – 1) 2055 Briarwood Ln. McCamley, Bill (D – 33) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Las Cruces, NM 88005 Espinoza, Nora (R – 59) Harper, Jason C. (R – 57) [email protected] 269 Gene NW White, James P. (R – 20) 2610 S. Espina 9132 Suncrest SW 904 Conway Ave. Box 203 575-524-9136 / 575-496-8822 [email protected] [email protected] Box 458 Albuquerque, NM 87107 [email protected] Las Cruces, NM 88001 Albuquerque, NM 87121 Las Cruces, NM 88005 Farmington, NM 87499 608 Golondrina 4917 Foxmoore Ct. NE Mesilla Park, NM 88048 505-344-8449 1554 Catron Ave. SE 575-522-3352 / 575-526-5600 505-831-4148 575-524-4462 505-436-0535 Baldonado, Alonzo (R – 8) Roswell, NM 88201 Rio Rancho, NM 87144 575-496-5731 Albuquerque, NM 87123 [email protected] 575-623-5324 505-554-7970 Smith, James E. (R – 22) 505-271-4746 Cisneros, Carlos R. (D – 6) Martinez, Richard C. (D – 5) Payne, William H. (R – 20) Shendo, Jr., Benny (D – 22) Box 370 McMillan, Terry H. (R – 37) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Los Lunas, NM 87031 Ezzell, Candy Spence (R – 58) Herrell, Yvette (R – 51) [email protected] Box 1783 Wooley, Bob (R – 66) Box 1129 Box 762 Box 14823 Box 634 505-363-6214 [email protected] [email protected] 2001 E Lohman Ave. #282 Sandia Park, NM 87047 [email protected] Questa, NM 87556 Espanola, NM 87532 Albuquerque, NM 87191 Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 Box 2125 Box 4338 Las Cruces, NM 88001 505-934-1075 4504 Verdre Dr. 505-670-5610 505-747-2337 505-986-4702 505-883-2564 Bandy, Paul C. (R – 3) Roswell, NM 88202 Alamogordo, NM 88311 575-635-0534 Roswell, NM 88201 [email protected] 575-625-0550 575-430-2113 Stapleton, Sheryl Williams (D – 19) 575-627-6277 Cotter, Lee S. (R – 36) McSorley, Cisco (D – 16) Pinto, John (D – 3) Smith, John Arthur (D – 35) 388 C.R. 2900 Miera, Rick (D – 11) [email protected] 6670 Butterfield Rdg. [email protected] 509 W. Morgan Ave. [email protected] Aztec, NM 87410 Fajardo, Kelly K. (R – 7) Irwin, Dona G. (D – 32) [email protected] Box 25385 Youngblood, Monica (R – 68) Las Cruces, NM 88007 415 Wellesley Pl. NE Gallup, NM 87301 Box 998 505-334-0865 [email protected] [email protected] 1011 Forrester NW Albuquerque, NM 87125 [email protected] 575-525-3200 Albuquerque, NM 87106 505-371-8342 Deming, NM 88031 1125 N. Molina 420 S. Slate Albuquerque, NM 87102 505-265-6089 9832 Stone St. NW 505-266-0588 575-546-8546 / 575-546-4979 Bratton, Donald E. (R – 62) Belen, NM 87002 Deming, NM 88030 505-843-6641 Albuquerque, NM 87114 Griego, Phil A. (D – 39) Pirtle, Cliff R. (R – 32) [email protected] 505-573-0471 575-544-6003 / 575-546-9376 Steinborn, Jeff (D – 35) 505-342-6250 [email protected] Moores, Mark (R – 21) [email protected] Soules, William P. (D – 37) 2012 N. McKinley Pacheco, Paul A. (R – 23) [email protected] Box 10 [email protected] 5507 Y.O. Rd. [email protected] Hobbs, NM 88240 Gallegos, David M. (R – 61) Jeff, Sandra D. (D – 5) [email protected] Box 562 San Jose, NM 87565 9641 Seligman Ave. NE Roswell, NM 88203 5054 Silver King 575-397-4093 / 575-393-5325 [email protected] [email protected] 4216 Rancho Grande Pl. NW Las Cruces, NM 88004 505-469-9470 Albuquerque, NM 87109 575-626-7046 Las Cruces, NM 88011 Box 998 Box 631 Albuquerque, NM 87120 575-635-5615 505-681-1975 575-522-3521 Brown, Cathrynn N. (R – 55) Eunice, NM 88231 Crownpoint, NM 87313 505-922-0850/505-263-9235 Griggs, Ron (R – 34) Rodriguez, Nancy (D – 24) [email protected] 575-394-0099 505-786-4994 Stewart, Mimi (D – 21) [email protected] Morales, Howie C. (D – 28) [email protected] Torraco, Lisa A. (R – 18) 1814 N. Guadalupe St. Perea, Vickie (R – 50) [email protected] 2704 Birdie Loop [email protected] 1838 Camino La Canada [email protected] Carlsbad, NM 88220 Gallegos, Doreen Y. (D – 52) Kane, Emily (D – 15) [email protected] 313 Moon St. NE Alamogordo, NM 88310 4285 Swan St. Santa Fe, NM 87501 1019 2nd St. NW 575-885-0624 / 575-706-4420 [email protected] [email protected] Box 1486 Albuquerque, NM 87123 575-439-1331 Silver City, NM 88061 505-983-8913 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Box 2915 9817 Riverside Dr. NW Belen, NM 87002 505-275-2355 575-574-0043 505-244-0530 Mesilla Park, NM 88047 Albuquerque, NM 87114 505-414-2705 18 575-649-6325 / 575-527-8511 505-890-4319 19 Conservation Voters New Mexico 507 A Webber Street Non-Profit Org. US Postage Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 PAID Santa Fe, NM Permit #10

CONSERVATION VOTERS NEW MEXICO PROTECTING OUR LAND OF ENCHANTMENT, ONE VOTE AT A TIME

www.CVNM.org

Our vision is for a New Mexico where decision-makers and public policies represent the conservation values of our people.

Our mission Conservation Voters New Mexico, a nonpartisan, non-profit 501(c)(4) organization, is connecting the people of New Mexico to their political power to protect our air, land, and water for a healthy Land of Enchantment.

We do this by: Mobilizing voters, Winning elections, Holding elected officials accountable, and Advancing responsible public policies.

2013-2014 CONSERVATION SCORECARD