DOCSLIB.ORG

The Primary Physiological Roles of Autoinducer 2 in Escherichia Coli Are Chemotaxis and Biofilm Formation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Primary Physiological Roles of Autoinducer 2 in Escherichia Coli Are Chemotaxis and Biofilm Formation microorganisms Perspective The Primary Physiological Roles of Autoinducer 2 in Escherichia coli Are Chemotaxis and Biofilm Formation Sooyeon Song 1 and Thomas K. Wood 2,* 1 Department of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Jeollabuk-do, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-7000, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Autoinducer 2 (AI-2) is a ubiquitous metabolite but, instead of acting as a “universal signal,” relatively few phenotypes have been associated with it, and many scientists believe AI-2 is often a metabolic byproduct rather than a signal. Here, the aim is to present evidence that AI-2 influences both biofilm formation and motility (swarming and chemotaxis), using Escherichia coli as the model system, to establish AI-2 as a true signal with an important physiological role in this bacterium. In addition, AI-2 signaling is compared to the other primary signal of E. coli, indole, and it is shown that they have opposite effects on biofilm formation and virulence. Keywords: AI-2; chemotaxis; aggregation; biofilm; motility; Escherichia coli 1. Introduction Citation: Song, S.; Wood, T.K. The Quorum sensing (QS) is the process by which bacteria communicate via secreted Primary Physiological Roles of signals (autoinducers); once the concentration of the autoinducers reaches a threshold, Autoinducer 2 in Escherichia coli Are the signal is detected, and gene expression is altered [1]. The roles of QS are diverse and Chemotaxis and Biofilm Formation. include population density detection, virulence, biofilm formation, and the maintenance Microorganisms 2021, 9, 386. of the stress response [2]. Although inhibitors of QS (quorum-quenching compounds) https://doi.org/10.3390/ are still promoted as a means to reduce virulence without promoting resistance [3], these microorganisms9020386 compounds will indubitably and unfortunately fail. The main problem is that the inhibition of QS leads to pleiotropic effects that affect growth; hence, lab strains and clinical isolates Academic Editor: Charles M. Dozois rapidly evolve resistance to these compounds [4–6]. Clearly, it is imperative to have a better understanding of QS in order to be in a position to better control bacteria to prevent Received: 7 January 2021 diseases, such as stomach cancer and ulcers caused by Helicobacter pylori and Lyme disease Accepted: 12 February 2021 by Borrelia burgdorferi [7], and to utilize them for synthetic biology applications. Therefore, Published: 14 February 2021 in this opinion piece, we probe the physiological role of AI-2 by focusing on the best-studied bacterium, Escherichia coli. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in 2. Autoinducer-2 published maps and institutional affil- iations. Commensal E. coli has several QS pathways, including one system based on in- dole (Figure1)[ 8–10], which is produced by TnaA from tryptophan, and another sys- tem based on autoinducer 2 (AI-2) (Figure1)[ 11], which is produced by LuxS from S- ribosylhomocysteine [12]. It appears AI-2 is used primarily for communication inside the gastrointestinal tract at 37 ◦C, while indole is used primarily at lower temperatures (30 ◦C Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. and lower) when the bacterium is outside of its eucaryotic host [9]. Although E. coli can Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. detect homoserine lactones through the autoinducer-1 sensor SdiA (a LuxR homolog), it This article is an open access article E. coli distributed under the terms and lacks a homoserine lactone synthase to produce the homoserine lactone signal, so conditions of the Creative Commons uses SdiA to eavesdrop on signals of other bacteria [13]. Moreover, there is an interaction Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// between these systems in that SdiA has been shown to be important for indole signaling in creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ E. coli [8]. 4.0/). Microorganisms 2021, 9, 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020386 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Microorganisms 2021, 9, 386 2 of 5 Once produced by LuxS, the AI-2 precursor 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione is con- verted spontaneously into R-2-methyl-2,3,3,4-tetrahydroxytetrahydrofuran (R-THMF) in E. coli (Figure 1), and R-THMF is the active form of AI-2 [7]. Hydrophilic AI-2 is trans- ported from the cell by the membrane protein TqsA [14]. Once a threshold concentration is reached in the late exponential phase, AI-2 is imported into E. coli through its recogni- tion by the AI-2 receptor LsrB [15]. In addition to LsrB in E. coli, LuxP (e.g., Vibrio harveyi) and the dCACHE-domain proteins PctA/TlpQ (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) are receptors for AI-2 [15], so there are at least three forms of AI-2 receptors in different bacteria. Further- more, upon import, AI-2 is phosphorylated by LsrK in E. coli, and phosphorylated AI-2 Microorganisms 2021, 9, 386 2 of 5 binds and inhibits the repressor LsrR, which leads to changes in gene expression primarily at 37 °C [9]. Figure 1. ComparisonFigure 1. Comparison of the phenotypes of the phenotypes affected affected by by(A ()A autoinducer) autoinducer 2 2 (AI-2) (AI-2) and and (B) ( indole.B) indole. Curved Curved black arrows black indicate arrows indicate cell motility/movement,cell motility/movement, QS is quorum QS is quorum sensing, sensing, EHEC EHEC is isEscherichiaEscherichia colicoliO157:H7, O157:H7, and and flagella flagella are indicated are indicated by two lines by two at lines at one of the cellone ofpoles. the cell Human poles. Human cells are cells indicated are indicated by bypink pink hexa hexagons.gons. GreenGreen lightning lightning indicates indicates the application the application of indole. of The indole. The R R R-2-methyl-2,3,3,4-tetrah-2-methyl-2,3,3,4-tetrahydroxytetrahydrofuranydroxytetrahydrofuran (R- (THMF)-THMF) form form ofof AI-2 AI-2 is shown.is shown. Once produced by LuxS, the AI-2 precursor 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione is con- 3. AI-2verted and spontaneouslyBiofilm Formation into R-2-methyl-2,3,3,4-tetrahydroxytetrahydrofuran (R-THMF) in E. coli (Figure1), and R-THMF is the active form of AI-2 [7]. Hydrophilic AI-2 is trans- Although indole reduces both pathogenic [16] and non-pathogenic E. coli biofilm for- ported from the cell by the membrane protein TqsA [14]. Once a threshold concentration is mationreached [17], inAI-2 the increases late exponential E. coli phase, biofilm AI-2 isformation imported into(FigureE. coli 1).through Initially, its recognition QS was linked to biofilmby formation the AI-2 receptor using LsrB non- [15E.]. Incoli addition species to LsrBand inbasedE. coli on, LuxP non-AI-2 (e.g., Vibrio signaling, harveyi) and specifically, for homoserinethe dCACHE-domain lactone increasing proteins PctA/TlpQ Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas aeruginosa aeruginosa [18].) areLater receptors studies, for AI- with Vibrio cholerae2 [ 15[19],], so Serratia there are liquefaciens at least three forms[20], ofand AI-2 Streptococcus receptors in different mutans bacteria. [21], confirmed Furthermore, the link of upon import, AI-2 is phosphorylated by LsrK in E. coli, and phosphorylated AI-2 binds QS to andbiofilm inhibits formation. the repressor LsrR, which leads to changes in gene expression primarily at The37 ◦ C[first9]. report of AI-2 and biofilm formation was indirect and based on masking AI- 2 signaling in E. coli with the QS inhibitor (5Z)-4-bromo-5-(bromomethylene)-3-butyl- 3. AI-2 and Biofilm Formation 2(5H)-furanone (henceforth furanone) from the alga Delisea pulchra; in this report, biofilm Although indole reduces both pathogenic [16] and non-pathogenic E. coli biofilm formation was reduced by 60 µg/mL furanone [22]. Later reports of AI-2 influencing bio- formation [17], AI-2 increases E. coli biofilm formation (Figure1). Initially, QS was linked film formationto biofilm formation were based using on non- luxSE. coli mutantsspecies and rather based than on non-AI-2 purified signaling, AI-2. For specifically, example, a luxS mutationfor homoserine in Streptococcus lactone increasinggordonii influencedPseudomonas aeruginosamixed-species[18]. Later biofilm studies, formation with Vibrio with Por- phyromonascholerae gingivalis[19], Serratia [23], liquefaciens a luxS[20 mutation], and Streptococcus had a mutanssmall [21impact], confirmed on the the architecture link of of KlebsiellaQS to pneumoniae biofilm formation. (although there was no effect for a luxS mutant for intestinal coloni- The first report of AI-2 and biofilm formation was indirect and based on masking zationAI-2 and signaling colonization in E. coli onwith polystyrene) the QS inhibitor [24], (5Z )-4-bromo-5-(bromomethylene)-3-butyl-and a luxS mutant increased biofilm for- mation2( 5Hin )-furanoneHelicobacter (henceforth pylori [25]. furanone) Unfortunately, from the alga theseDelisea earl pulchra;y resultsin this related report, biofilmto AI-2 via luxS formation was reduced by 60 µg/mL furanone [22]. Later reports of AI-2 influencing biofilm formation were based on luxS mutants rather than purified AI-2. For example, a Microorganisms 2021, 9, 386 3 of 5 luxS mutation in Streptococcus gordonii influenced mixed-species biofilm formation with Porphyromonas gingivalis [23], a luxS mutation had a small impact on the architecture of Klebsiella pneumoniae (although there was no effect for a luxS mutant for intestinal colonization and colonization on polystyrene) [24], and a luxS mutant increased biofilm formation in Helicobacter pylori [25]. Unfortunately, these early results related to AI-2 via luxS mutations do not provide compelling evidence due to pleiotropic changes resulting from the luxS mutations. The first direct demonstration that AI-2 was responsible for influencing biofilm forma- tion was the 4- to 24-fold increase in biofilm formation in microtiter plates for three E. coli strains upon the addition of 11 µM of purified AI-2 [11]. Moreover, AI-2 failed to stimulate biofilm formation for an lsrK AI-2 regulation mutant, and AI-2 stimulated biofilm forma- tion five-fold in flow cells [11].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential of Bacterial Cellulose Chemisorbed with Anti-Metabolites, 3-Bromopyruvate Or Sertraline, to Fight Against Helicobacter Pylori Lawn Biofilm
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Potential of Bacterial Cellulose Chemisorbed with Anti-Metabolites, 3-Bromopyruvate or Sertraline, to Fight against Helicobacter pylori Lawn Biofilm Paweł Krzy˙zek 1,* , Gra˙zynaGo´sciniak 1 , Karol Fijałkowski 2 , Paweł Migdał 3 , Mariusz Dziadas 4 , Artur Owczarek 5 , Joanna Czajkowska 6, Olga Aniołek 7 and Adam Junka 8 1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-311 Szczecin, Poland; karol.fi[email protected] 3 Department of Environment, Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, 50-353 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 5 Department of Drug Form Technology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 6 Laboratory of Microbiology, Polish Center for Technology Development PORT, 54-066 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 7 Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, 02-662 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 8 Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium known mainly of its ability to cause persistent inflammations of the human stomach, resulting in peptic ulcer diseases and gastric cancers. Continuous exposure of this bacterium to antibiotics has resulted in high detection of multidrug-resistant strains and difficulties in obtaining a therapeutic effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroenteritis and Transmission of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Households1 Sharon Perry,* Maria De La Luz Sanchez,* Shufang Yang,* Thomas D
    Gastroenteritis and Transmission of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Households1 Sharon Perry,* Maria de la Luz Sanchez,* Shufang Yang,* Thomas D. Haggerty,* Philip Hurst,† Guillermo Perez-Perez,‡ and Julie Parsonnet* The mode of transmission of Helicobacter pylori gastrointestinal infections, infection is associated with infection is poorly characterized. In northern California, conditions of crowding and poor hygiene (7,8) and with 2,752 household members were tested for H. pylori infec- intrafamilial clustering (9–12). The organism has been tion in serum or stool at a baseline visit and 3 months later. recovered most reliably from vomitus and from stools dur- Among 1,752 person considered uninfected at baseline, ing rapid gastrointestinal transit (13). These findings raise 30 new infections (7 definite, 7 probable, and 16 possible) occurred, for an annual incidence of 7% overall and 21% the hypothesis that gastroenteritis episodes provide the in children <2 years of age. Exposure to an infected opportunity for H. pylori transmission. household member with gastroenteritis was associated Household transmission of gastroenteritis is common in with a 4.8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–17.1) the United States, particularly in homes with small chil- increased risk for definite or probable new infection, with dren (14). If H. pylori is transmitted person to person, one vomiting a greater risk factor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] might expect rates of new infection to be elevated after 6.3, CI 1.6–24.5) than diarrhea only (AOR 3.0, p = 0.65). exposure to persons with H. pylori–infected cases of gas- Of probable or definite new infections, 75% were attributa- troenteritis.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Coli: Serotypes Other Than O157:H7 Prepared by Zuber Mulla, BA, MSPH DOH, Regional Epidemiologist
    E. coli: Serotypes other than O157:H7 Prepared by Zuber Mulla, BA, MSPH DOH, Regional Epidemiologist Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the predominant nonpathogenic facultative flora of the human intestine [1]. However, several strains of E. coli have developed the ability to cause disease in humans. Strains of E. coli that cause gastroenteritis in humans can be grouped into six categories: enteroaggregative (EAEC), enterohemorrhagic (EHEC), enteroinvasive (EIEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), and diffuse adherent (DAEC). Pathogenic E. coli are serotyped on the basis of their O (somatic), H (flagellar), and K (capsular) surface antigen profiles [1]. Each of the six categories listed above has a different pathogenesis and comprises a different set of O:H serotypes [2]. In Florida, gastrointestinal illness caused by E. coli is reportable in two categories: E. coli O157:H7 or E. coli, other. In 1997, 52 cases of E. coli O157:H7 and seven cases of E. coli, other (known serotype), were reported to the Florida Department of Health [3]. Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) - EAEC has been associated with persistent diarrhea (>14 days), especially in developing countries [1]. The diarrhea is usually watery, secretory and not accompanied by fever or vomiting [1]. The incubation period has been estimated to be 20 to 48 hours [2]. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) - While the main EHEC serotype is E. coli O157:H7 (see July 24, 1998, issue of the “Epi Update”), other serotypes such as O111:H8 and O104:H21 are diarrheogenic in humans [2]. EHEC excrete potent toxins called verotoxins or Shiga toxins (so called because of their close resemblance to the Shiga toxin of Shigella dysenteriae 1This group of organisms is often referred to as Shiga toxin-producing E.
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Signals Is Wide- Spread in Gram-Negative Methylobacterium
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2007), 17(2), 226–233 Production of Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Signals is Wide- Spread in Gram-Negative Methylobacterium POONGUZHALI, SELVARAJ, MUNUSAMY MADHAIYAN, AND TONGMIN SA* Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea Received: August 2, 2006 Accepted: October 2, 2006 Abstract Members of Methylobacterium, referred as pink- knowledge on the Methylobacterium-plant interactions pigmented facultative methylotrophic bacteria, are frequently over the past two decades suggested interesting novel associated with terrestrial and aquatic plants, tending to form interactions between PPFMs and plants. Beneficial plant- aggregates on the phyllosphere. We report here that the production growth promoting bacteria interact with plants through of autoinducer molecules involved in the cell-to-cell signaling direct and indirect mechanisms. Direct mechanisms for the process, which is known as quorum sensing, is common among most part entail either providing the bacterial compounds Methylobacterium species. Several strains of Methylobacterium that promote plant growth or facilitating the uptake of were tested for their ability to produce N-acyl-homoserine nutrients; for example, production of phytohormones [9] lactone (AHL) signal molecules using different indicators. and siderophores [13]. The indirect effects occur through Most strains of Methylobacterium tested could elicit a suppression of one or more phytopathogenic microorganisms positive response in Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring through biocontrol [20] or induction of plant defense lacZ fused to a gene that is regulated by autoinduction. The enzymes [14]. Beneficial effects of plant-Methylobacterium synthesis of these compounds was cell-density dependent, and associations have been suggested to be due to production the maximal activity was reached during the late exponential of phytohormones [22] and enzymes such as 1- to stationary phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Communication Among Bacteria
    Colloquium Chemical communication among bacteria Michiko E. Taga and Bonnie L. Bassler* Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1014 Cell–cell communication in bacteria is accomplished through the Low GϩC Gram-positive bacteria typically use modified exchange of chemical signal molecules called autoinducers. This oligopeptides as autoinducers (15–17). These signals are gener- process, called quorum sensing, allows bacteria to monitor their ically referred to as autoinducing polypeptides (AIPs) (Fig. 1B). environment for the presence of other bacteria and to respond to AIPs are produced in the cytoplasm as precursor peptides and fluctuations in the number and͞or species present by altering are subsequently cleaved, modified, and exported. AIPs specif- particular behaviors. Most quorum-sensing systems are species- or ically interact with the external domains of membrane-bound group-specific, which presumably prevents confusion in mixed- two-component sensor kinase proteins. Interaction of the auto- species environments. However, some quorum-sensing circuits inducer with its cognate sensor stimulates the kinase activity of control behaviors that involve interactions among bacterial spe- the sensor kinase protein, resulting in the phosphorylation of its cies. These quorum-sensing circuits can involve both intra- and partner response regulator protein. The phosphorylated re- interspecies communication mechanisms. Finally, anti-quorum- sponse regulator protein binds DNA and alters the transcription sensing strategies are present in both bacteria and eukaryotes, and of target genes. Some examples of behaviors controlled by AIP these are apparently designed to combat bacteria that rely on quorum-sensing systems include genetic competence and sporu- cell–cell communication for the successful adaptation to particular lation in Bacillus subtilis (18, 19), competence for DNA uptake niches.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation of the Autoinducer-Quenching Strain That Inhibits Lasr in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 6328-6342; doi:10.3390/ijms15046328 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Article Isolation of the Autoinducer-Quenching Strain that Inhibits LasR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lixing Weng 1,*, Yuqian Zhang 2, Yuxiang Yang 3 and Lianhui Wang 2,* 1 School of Geography and Biological Information, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, China 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Organic Electronics & Information Displays and Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 9 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Microbiology and Microbial Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (L.We.); [email protected] (L.Wa.); Tel./Fax: +86-25-8586-6634 (L.We.); Tel.: +86-25-8586-6333 (L.Wa.); Fax: +86-25-8586-6396 (L.Wa.). Received: 4 July 2013; in revised form: 21 March 2014 / Accepted: 28 March 2014 / Published: 14 April 2014 Abstract: Quorum sensing (QS) has been recognized as a general phenomenon in microorganisms and plays an important role in many pathogenic bacteria. In this report, we used the Agrobacterium tumefaciens biosensor strain NT1 to rapidly screen for autoinducer-quenching inhibitors from bacteria. After initial screening 5389 isolates obtained from land and beach soil, 53 putative positive strains were identified. A confirmatory bioassay was carried out after concentrating the putative positive culture supernatant, and 22 strains were confirmed to have anti-LasR activity.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Is Helicobacter Pylori Good for You?
    University of Maryland School of Medicine A Third Century Is Helicobacter pylori Good for You? To Treat or Not to Treat, That is the Question Steven J. Czinn, M.D. Professor and Chair University of Maryland School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics Baltimore, Maryland America’s Oldest Public Medical School - USA Where Discovery Transforms Medicine Learning Objectives Disclosure • To demonstrate that H. pylori is responsible In the past 12 months, I have had no relevant for a significant portion of gastroduodenal financial relationships with the disease. manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) • To understand how the host immune response and/or provider(s) of commercial services contributes to Helicobacter associated discussed in this CME activity. disease. • To understand how the host immune response to Helicobacter infection might prevent asthma. • To understand which patient populations should be treated. H. pylori is an Important Human Pathogen World-Wide Prevalence of H. pylori • H. pylori is a gram negative microaerophilic bacterium that selectively colonizes the stomach. 70% 80% • It infects about 50% of the world’s population. 30% 70% 30% 50% • It is classically considered a non-invasive organism, 40% 50% 70% 70% • There is a vigorous innate and adaptive immune 70% 90% response and inflammation that is Th1 predominant 70% and includes (chronic) lymphocyte and (active) 90% 80% 80% 70% neutrophil components. 20% • Despite this response the bacterium generally persists for the life of the host. Marshall, 1995 JAMA 274:1064 1 Natural History of H. pylori infection Eradicating H. pylori Treats or Prevents: Colon Gastric cancer??? Initial infection (in childhood) Adenocarcinoma Nonulcer Chronic gastritis (universal) Dyspepsia H.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicobacter Spp. — Food- Or Waterborne Pathogens?
    FRI FOOD SAFETY REVIEWS Helicobacter spp. — Food- or Waterborne Pathogens? M. Ellin Doyle Food Research Institute University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WI 53706 Contents34B Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Virulence Factors ...........................................................................................................................2 Associated Diseases .......................................................................................................................2 Gastrointestinal Disease .........................................................................................................2 Neurological Disease..............................................................................................................3 Other Diseases........................................................................................................................4 Epidemiology.................................................................................................................................4 Prevalence..............................................................................................................................4 Transmission ..........................................................................................................................4 Summary .......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases Among Burmese Refugees in Australia Nadia J
    Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Burmese Refugees in Australia Nadia J. Chaves,1 Katherine B. Gibney,1 Karin Leder, Daniel P. O’Brien, Caroline Marshall, and Beverley-Ann Biggs Increasing numbers of refugees from Burma (Myan- eases Service outpatient clinics at the Royal Melbourne mar) are resettling in Western countries. We performed a Hospital, Australia, during January 1, 2004–December retrospective study of 156 Burmese refugees at an Austra- 31, 2008. Patients were identifi ed through the hospital lian teaching hospital. Of those tested, Helicobacter pylori registration database, and medical, pathologic, radiolog- infection affected 80%, latent tuberculosis 70%, vitamin D ic, and pharmacologic records were reviewed. Screening defi ciency 37%, and strongyloidiasis 26%. Treating these tests audited included those suggested by the Australasian diseases can prevent long-term illness. Society for Infectious Diseases refugee screening guide- lines (5), along with vitamin D and hematologic studies. urma (Myanmar) has been the most common country These latter tests included full blood count, mean corpus- Bof origin for refugees who have recently resettled in cular volume, and platelet count. Investigations were per- the United States and Australia (1,2). Before resettling in formed at the discretion of the treating doctor, and not all Australia, most refugees undergo testing for HIV, have a tests were performed for each patient. Time was calculated chest radiograph to exclude active tuberculosis (TB), and from time of arrival in Australia to fi rst clinic attendance. may undergo other testing, depending on exposure risk. The results of serologic tests and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Many refugees also receive a health check and treatment tests (QFT-G; Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Aus- for malaria and stool parasites within 72 hours of departure tralia), were interpreted according to the manufacturers’ for Australia (3,4).
    [Show full text]
  • Escherichia Coli O157:H7 And
    SCHOOL HEALTH/ CHILDCARE PROVIDER E. COLI O157:H7 INFECTION AND HEMOLYTIC UREMIC SYNDROME (HUS) Reportable to local or state health department Consult the health department before posting or distributing the Parent/Guardian fact sheet. CAUSE E. coli O157:H7 bacteria. SYMPTOMS Watery or severe bloody diarrhea, stomach cramps, and low-grade fever. Symptoms usually last 5 to 10 days. Some infected persons may have mild symptoms or may have no symptoms. In some instances, infection with E. coli O157:H7 may result in widespread breakdown of red blood cells leading to Hemolytic Uremia Syndrome (HUS). HUS affects the kidneys and the ability of blood to clot; it is more common in children under 5 years old and the elderly. SPREAD E. coli bacteria leave the body through the stool of an infected person and enter another person when hands, food, or objects (such as toys) contaminated with stool are placed in the mouth. Spread can occur when people do not wash their hands after using the toilet or changing diapers. Cattle are also a source of these bacteria and people can be infected with E. coli O157:H7 through eating contaminated beef, eating fresh produce contaminated by cattle feces, or through contact with cattle or the farm environment. INCUBATION It takes from 1 to 8 days, usually about 3 to 4 days, from the time a person is exposed until symptoms develop. CONTAGIOUS As long as E. coli O157:H7 bacteria are present in the stool (even in the absence PERIOD of symptoms), a person can pass the bacteria to other people.
    [Show full text]
  • Quorum Sensing in Bacteria
    17 Aug 2001 12:48 AR AR135-07.tex AR135-07.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GDL Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001. 55:165–99 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved QUORUM SENSING IN BACTERIA Melissa B. Miller and Bonnie L. Bassler Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1014; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Key Words autoinducer, homoserine lactone, two-component system, cell-cell communication, virulence ■ Abstract Quorum sensing is the regulation of gene expression in response to fluctuations in cell-population density. Quorum sensing bacteria produce and release chemical signal molecules called autoinducers that increase in concentration as a function of cell density. The detection of a minimal threshold stimulatory con- centration of an autoinducer leads to an alteration in gene expression. Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria use quorum sensing communication circuits to regulate a diverse array of physiological activities. These processes include symbiosis, virulence, competence, conjugation, antibiotic production, motility, sporulation, and biofilm for- mation. In general, Gram-negative bacteria use acylated homoserine lactones as au- toinducers, and Gram-positive bacteria use processed oligo-peptides to communicate. Recent advances in the field indicate that cell-cell communication via autoinducers occurs both within and between bacterial species. Furthermore, there is mounting data suggesting that bacterial autoinducers elicit specific responses from host organisms. Although the nature of the chemical signals, the signal relay mechanisms, and the target genes controlled by bacterial quorum sensing systems differ, in every case the ability to communicate with one another allows bacteria to coordinate the gene expression, and therefore the behavior, of the entire community.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Informed Decisions: Regulatory Interactions Between Two-Component Systems
    Review TRENDS in Microbiology Vol.11 No.8 August 2003 359 Making informed decisions: regulatory interactions between two-component systems Jetta J.E. Bijlsma and Eduardo A. Groisman Department of Molecular Microbiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8230, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110, USA Bacteria experience a multitude of stresses in the com- phosphorylate from small molecular weight phosphoryl plex niches they inhabit. These stresses are denoted by donors, such as acetyl phosphate and carbamoyl phos- specific signals that typically alter the activity of individ- phate [3,4]. In addition, the vast majority of sensor kinases ual two-component regulatory systems. Processing of exhibit phosphatase activity towards their cognate multiple signals by different two-component systems response regulators. Although most two-component sys- occurs when multiple sensors interact with a single tems entail a single His-to-Asp phosphotransfer event response regulator, by phosphatases interrupting phos- between a histidine kinase and a response regulator, there phoryl transfer in phosphorelays and through transcrip- is a subset that consists of a three-step His-Asp-His-Asp tional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Gaining phosphorelay (Fig. 1b) [1,2]. The extra phosphorylatable insight into these mechanisms provides an understand- domains in a phosphorelay can be present in separate ing at the molecular level of bacterial adaptation to ever proteins or be part of multi-domain (i.e.
    [Show full text]