Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity Combinations for Simultaneous

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Novel Protein and Poxvirus-Based Vaccine Combinations for Simultaneous Induction of Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity This information is current as Claire L. Hutchings, Sarah C. Gilbert, Adrian V. S. Hill and of September 24, 2021. Anne C. Moore J Immunol 2005; 175:599-606; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.599 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/175/1/599 Downloaded from References This article cites 50 articles, 25 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/175/1/599.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 24, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Novel Protein and Poxvirus-Based Vaccine Combinations for Simultaneous Induction of Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity1 Claire L. Hutchings, Sarah C. Gilbert, Adrian V. S. Hill, and Anne C. Moore2 The presence of both cell-mediated and humoral immunity is important in protection from and clearance of a number of infectious pathogens. We describe novel vaccine regimens using combinations of plasmid DNA, poxvirus and protein to induce strong Ag-specific T cell and Ab responses simultaneously in a murine model. Intramuscular (i.m.) immunization with plasmid DNA encoding the middle Ag of hepatitis B (DNA) concurrently with a commercial hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine (Engerix-B) followed by boosting immunizations with both modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) encoding the middle Ag of HBV and Engerix-B induced high levels of CD4؉ and CD8؉ T cells and high titer Ab responses to hepatitis B surface Ag (HbsAg). Substitution of Downloaded from Engerix-B with adjuvant-free rHBsAg induced similar T cell responses and greatly enhanced Ab levels. Repeated immunizations with recombinant or nonrecombinant MVA mixed with Ag induced higher titers of Abs compared with immunization with either Ag or Engerix-B further demonstrating this novel adjuvant effect of MVA. The poxviruses NYVAC, fowlpox (FP9) and ALVAC, and to a lesser extent, adenovirus, also displayed similar adjuvant properties when used in combination with rHBsAg. The use of poxviruses as an adjuvant for protein to concurrently induce Ag-specific T cells and Abs could be applied to the development of vaccines for many diseases, including HIV and malaria, where both cell mediated and humoral immunity may be important for http://www.jimmunol.org/ protection. The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 175: 599–606. he major aim of vaccination is to generate sufficiently sponse is detectable in individuals with acute self-limited HBV but strong immune responses of the correct nature to protect is absent in individuals with chronic infection (10–12). This sug- T against disease. Most vaccines that are in used in humans, gests that a cell-mediated immune response may be important in except bacillus Calmette-Gue´rin, have been developed by optimiz- eliminating virus at an early stage of infection. A vaccine that ing their capacity to induce Ab responses. Novel candidate vac- effectively induces both cellular and humoral immunity may im- cines that have been developed to date either induce immune re- prove the efficacy of a HBV vaccination. sponses that are dominated by cellular or humoral immune Recombinant DNA and viral vectors have been used for a num- by guest on September 24, 2021 responses. For example, vaccines against intracellular pathogens, ber of years in laboratory animals and in human clinical trials as such as HIV or liver stage malaria, have been designed either to vectors for the Ag(s) of interest to induce strong effector and mem- induce strong T cell responses (1–3) or to induce Ab responses ory CD4ϩ and CD8ϩ T cell responses in both the prevention and against the extracellular form of the virus or parasite (4, 5). How- treatment of disease (2, 13–16). Widely used viral vectors include ever, it is now widely believed that the generation of both cellular modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) and NYVAC, both atten- and humoral responses may be important in vaccine efficacy for uated forms of vaccinia virus, the avipoxviruses FP9 and ALVAC, diverse causes of disease including viruses, bacteria, parasites, and and also nonreplicating adenovirus (ADV) (2, 15–21). We and cancer (4, 6–8). The licensed prophylactic vaccine to hepatitis B others have previously demonstrated in a pre-erythrocytic malaria virus (HBV),3 Engerix-B, is an example of a vaccine that induces vaccine model, where induction of IFN-␥ secreting T cells corre- Ab responses. It induces protective Abs in Ͼ85% of healthy re- cipients (9) and comprises the small surface Ag, S (HBsAg), pro- lates with protection, that heterologous prime-boost immunization duced in yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adsorbed to the with DNA and viral vectors is protective in mice, primate and adjuvant aluminum phosphate (alum). A vigorous CD8ϩ CTL re- human challenge models (2, 13, 16, 22, 23, 50). With respect to HBV vaccines, DNA and MVA encoding the middle Ag of HBV, comprising S and Pre-S2 Ags, have been designed in this labora- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United tory as a potential therapeutic vaccine for chronic HBV infection. Kingdom This prime-boost regimen has demonstrated potent induction of Received for publication January 30, 2004. Accepted for publication April 29, 2005. specific T cells in mice and humans and is currently in phase II The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance clinical trials (J. Schneider, personal communication). with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. In this study, we examined methods of inducing strong cellular 1 This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. A.V.S.H. is a Wellcome Trust and Ab responses in a mouse model of candidate and licensed Principal Fellow. HBV vaccines. Although this model cannot be used to assess pro- 2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Anne Moore, Wellcome Trust tection against HBV challenge, immunogenicity of Engerix-B can Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, U.K. E-mail address: [email protected]. be tested in mice, and this clinically licensed vaccine functions as 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HBsAg, small hepatitis B a good standard to compare our candidate vaccines to. We report surface Ag; MVA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara; ADV, adenovirus; ADVnr, non- here that prime-boost immunization with DNA and MVA (D/M) recombinant adenovirus; CMI, cell-mediated immunity; DC, dendritic cell.; LN, lymph node; DLN, draining LN; FP, fowlpox; i.d., intradermal; SFC, spot-forming induces potent T cell responses but poor levels of Ab against the cells. encoded HBsAg. Conversely, repeat immunization with Engerix-B Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/05/$02.00 600 ENHANCED IMMUNOGENICITY BY COADMINISTRATION OF POXVIRUS AND PROTEIN induced a weak T cell response but greatly increased Abs to rH- Aldrich) to each well. Optical densities at 405 nm were measured for each BsAg compared with D/M. The concurrent administration of these well. End point titers were determined at the x-axis intercept of the dilution curve, at three times the absorbance (A ) given for naive mouse serum vaccines induced both T cells and Abs to HBsAg. We sought to 405 diluted from 1/200 accordingly. analyze and further improve this coinduction of cell-mediated im- munity (CMI) and humoral immunity by combining the viral vec- Statistical analysis tors MVA, FP, ALVAC NYVAC, and ADV with the main com- Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 10. ponent of Engerix-B, rHBsAg. Here we show that poxviruses can Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine differences between groups. enhance T cell and Ab responses to a coadministered protein while retaining strong T cell immunogenicity for their encoded recom- Results binant Ag thereby demonstrating a method of strongly inducing Immunogenicity of DNA/MVA.HBs and protein immunization both types of immunity against a target Ag. This combination vac- T cell and Ab responses induced by the prime-boost regime of cine approach may be of benefit to the development of efficacious DNA/MVA were compared with homologous protein immuniza- vaccines where this type of immunity is required to protect against tion with or without alum (Fig. 1). pathogen challenge. Immunization with DNA/MVA induced high levels of IFN-␥ producing cells against peptide encoding a dominant CD8ϩ Materials and Methods epitope and whole rHBsAg in the spleen (Fig. 1A) and facial DLN Animals and immunizations (Fig. 1B). Immunization with HBsAg or Engerix-B induced min- Female BALB/c (H-2d) mice (BMSU, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, imal peptide and rHBsAg responses in spleen. However, the pep- U.K.), 4–6 wk old, were used in all experiments. Before immunization tide-specific response induced in axial DLN when immunized s.c. Downloaded from mice were anesthetized i.p.
Recommended publications
  • LECTURE 05 Acquired Immunity and Clonal Selection

    LECTURE 05 Acquired Immunity and Clonal Selection

    LECTURE: 05 Title: ACQUIRED "ADAPTIVE" IMMUNITY & CLONAL SELECTION THEROY LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The student should be able to: • Recognize that, acquired or adaptive immunity is a specific immunity. • Explain the mechanism of development of the specific immunity. • Enumerate the components of the specific immunity such as A. Primary immune response. B. Secondary immune response • Explain the different phases that are included in the primary and secondary immune responses such as: A. The induction phase. B. Exponential phase. C. Steady phase. D. Decline phase. • Compare between the phases of the primary and secondary immune responses. • Determine the type of the immunoglobulins involved in each phase. • Determine which immunoglobulin is induced first and, that last longer. • Enumerate the characteristics of the specific immunity such as: A. The ability to distinguish self from non-self. B. Specificity. C. Immunological memory. • Explain naturally and artificially acquired immunity (passive, and active). • Explain the two interrelated and independent mechanisms of the specific immune response such as : A. Humoral immunity. B. Cell-mediated (cellular) immunity. • Recognize that, the specific immunity is not always protective, for example; sometimes it causes allergies (hay fever), or it may be directed against one of the body’s own constituents, resulting in autoimmunity (thyroditis). LECTURE REFRENCE: 1. TEXTBOOK: ROITT, BROSTOFF, MALE IMMUNOLOGY. 6th edition. Chapter 2. pp. 15-31 2. TEXTBOOK: ABUL K. ABBAS. ANDREW H. LICHTMAN. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY. 5TH EDITION. Chapter 1. pg 3-12. 1 ACQUIRED (SPECIFIC) IMMUNITY INTRODUCTION Adaptive immunity is created after an interaction of lymphocytes with particular foreign substances which are recognized specifically by those lymphocytes.
  • Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist

    Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist

    2 Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex chal- non–antigen-specifc responses possibly leading to allergy, lenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been devel- autoimmunity, or even premature death—are being raised. oped empirically, with little or no understanding of how they Certain “off-targets effects” of vaccines have also been recog- activate the immune system. Their early protective effcacy is nized and call for studies to quantify their impact and identify primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specifc anti- the mechanisms at play. The objective of this chapter is to bodies (Box 2.1). However, there is more to antibody- extract from the complex and rapidly evolving feld of immu- mediated protection than the peak of vaccine-induced nology the main concepts that are useful to better address antibody titers. The quality of such antibodies (e.g., their these important questions. avidity, specifcity, or neutralizing capacity) has been identi- fed as a determining factor in effcacy. Long-term protection HOW DO VACCINES MEDIATE PROTECTION? requires the persistence of vaccine antibodies above protective thresholds and/or the maintenance of immune memory cells Vaccines protect by inducing effector mechanisms (cells or capable of rapid and effective reactivation with subsequent molecules) capable of rapidly controlling replicating patho- microbial exposure. The determinants of immune memory gens or inactivating their toxic components. Vaccine-induced induction, as well as the relative contribution of persisting immune effectors (Table 2.1) are essentially antibodies— antibodies and of immune memory to protection against spe- produced by B lymphocytes—capable of binding specifcally cifc diseases, are essential parameters of long-term vaccine to a toxin or a pathogen.2 Other potential effectors are cyto- effcacy.
  • Humoral Immunity and Complement Humoral Immunity B Cell Antigens

    Humoral Immunity and Complement Humoral Immunity B Cell Antigens

    Humoral Immunity Humoral Immunity and Complement Transfer of non-cell components of blood-- Robert Beatty antibodies, complement MCB150 Humoral immunity = antibody mediated B Cell Activation of T-dependent antigens B cell Antigens T cell dependent B cell antigens T cell independent Majority of antigens. Do not require thymus. Most protein antigens. No memory. T cell help required for B cell activation and antibody production. T-cell dependent antigens T-cell independent antigens 1 B Cell Activation T-dependent antigens Location of B Cell Activation Antigen activated B cells remain in T cell zones of LN. Linked Recognition Maximize contact of Need T cell epitope along with B cell epitope to B cells with T cells. get antibody response. B cells get help from T cells, help = CD40Ligand and IL-4. Clonal proliferation In Follicles Isotype Switching Affinity maturation Somatic hypermutation 2 T cell Independent Antigens B cell mitogens (e.g. LPS) B-1 cells At low levels normal immune response to LPS Activated by repeating CHO epitopes that provide crosslinking At high levels LPS can cause non-antigen specific to induce antigen uptake and activation. activation of B cells. Mitogen effect Antigen specific immune response Lower affinity, lower numbers, no memory. Primarily IgM. Antibody Effector Functions Opsonization Neutralization Antibody Effector Functions Enhancement of phagocytosis Neutralizing abs block active site for adherence, entry into host cell, or active site of toxin Neutralizing antibodies are usually high affinity and primarily IgG. 3 Antibody-dependent cell-mediated Complement Activation cytotoxicity (ADCC) Antibody Effector Functions Antibody Effector Functions Antibody binds to pathogen or infected target cell.
  • Cellular and Humoral Components of Monocyte and Neutrophil Chen1otaxis in Cord Blood

    Cellular and Humoral Components of Monocyte and Neutrophil Chen1otaxis in Cord Blood

    Pediat. Res. 11: 677-()1\0 (1977) Chemotaxis neutrophil complement newborn monocytes phagocytes Cellular and Humoral Components of Monocyte and Neutrophil Chen1otaxis in Cord Blood SAYITA G . PAHWA.""'' RAJENDRA PAHWA. ELENA GRII\IES. AND E LIZA13 ETII SI\IITII\VICK Departlllt'lll of Pediatrics aml/nmrwwlogy, Memorial Sloa/1-1\ellcrillg Ca11ca Centa, Nell' York, New York , USA Summary experiment, blood from a healthy adult was tested simultane­ ously. 1\lonoqte and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (J>I\IN) chemo­ taxis was studied in cord blood from healthv term infants. 1\Jono­ ISOLATION OF CELLS c;yte chemotaxis was normal to increased ( 115-126%) whereas PI\IN chemotaxis was decreased (79%) in comparison with that Mononuclear leukocytes were isolated by density gradient of healthy adult l'ontrol subjects. Generation of chemotactic centrifugation on a sodium mctrizoatc-Ficoll solution (Lympho­ factors from cord sera was impaired, being 55% of that gener­ prep. Nyegard and Co., Oslo) (5). The cells were washed three ated by J)(Wied normal human serum (I'NIIS). Cord serum was times and resuspended in RPI\11 (Gibco) supplemented with less inhibitory than pooled adult human serum fur adult mono­ penicillin 50 units, streptomycin 50 Jlg . and glutamine 2 ml\1/ml. qtes when the cells were suspended in HI % serum and tested for As simultaneous analysis of monocytcs by myelopcroxidasc stain chemotaxis. No inhibition of chemotactic factors by either cord and Wright stain were in close agreement. the percentage of or adult sera was observed. The dissociation of chemotactic monocytcs was routinely determined by a myelopcroxidasc stain response of the two diiTerent phagocytic cells may represent a ( 13 ); Wright stain was done to exclude contamination by gra nu­ protecth·e mechanism whereby one cell can compensate for a locytes.
  • I M M U N O L O G Y Core Notes

    I M M U N O L O G Y Core Notes

    II MM MM UU NN OO LL OO GG YY CCOORREE NNOOTTEESS MEDICAL IMMUNOLOGY 544 FALL 2011 Dr. George A. Gutman SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE (Copyright) 2011 Regents of the University of California TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 ANTIGEN/ANTIBODY INTERACTIONS ..............................................9 CHAPTER 3 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE I..................................................................17 CHAPTER 4 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE II.................................................................23 CHAPTER 5 COMPLEMENT...................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 6 ANTIBODY GENETICS, ISOTYPES, ALLOTYPES, IDIOTYPES.....45 CHAPTER 7 CELLULAR BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY: CLONAL SELECTION..................................................................53 CHAPTER 8 GENETIC BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY...................................61 CHAPTER 9 IMMUNOGLOBULIN BIOSYNTHESIS ...............................................69 CHAPTER 10 BLOOD GROUPS: ABO AND Rh .........................................................77 CHAPTER 11 CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND MHC ........................................83 CHAPTER 12 CELL INTERACTIONS IN CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY ..............91 CHAPTER 13 T-CELL/B-CELL COOPERATION IN HUMORAL IMMUNITY......105 CHAPTER 14 CELL SURFACE MARKERS OF T-CELLS, B-CELLS AND MACROPHAGES...............................................................111
  • B Cell Activation and Humoral Immunity

    B Cell Activation and Humoral Immunity

    B cell activation and Humoral Immunity Humoral immunity is mediated by secreted antibodies and its physiological function is defense against extracellular microbes (including viruses) and microbial exotoxins. Humoral immunity can be transferred to other individuals by the transfer of serum (antibodies). Defect in humoral immunity leads to enhanced infections by bacteria and fungi. Antibodies also participate in autoimmune disorders and hypersensitivity. When an antigen with multiple epitopes gains entry into the body, different clones of B cells recognize and produce antibodies against different epitopes, thus the natural response is said to by polyclonal. However, by using hybridoma technology it is possible to develop a clone of B cells directed against a single epitope, and produce monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies are produced by plasma cells in the secondary lymphoid organs, but antibodies can perform their effector functions at any site in the body. Once the antibodies enter the circulation or mucosa, they can easily reach sites of infection. Circulating antibodies can recognize antigen present in blood or can pass through the endothelium into tissue spaces and render their effector functions. The first exposure to a microbe or an antigen, either by infection or by vaccination, leads to the activation of naive B lymphocytes. These B cells differentiate into antibody-producing plasma cells and memory cells. Some of the antibody producing cells migrate to the bone marrow and live in this site for several years, where they continue to produce antibodies even when antigen has been eliminated. It is estimated that over half the IgG found in serum of normal individuals is derived from these long-lived antibody producing cells, which were induced by exposure to various antigens throughout the life of the individual.
  • Mechanisms of Dysregulated Humoral and Cellular Immunity by SARS-Cov-2

    Mechanisms of Dysregulated Humoral and Cellular Immunity by SARS-Cov-2

    pathogens Review Mechanisms of Dysregulated Humoral and Cellular Immunity by SARS-CoV-2 Nima Taefehshokr 1 , Sina Taefehshokr 2 and Bryan Heit 1,3,* 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Human Immunology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N0M 2N0, Canada; [email protected] 2 Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 51368, Iran; [email protected] 3 Robarts Research Institute, London, ON N6A 5K8, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-661-3407 Received: 10 November 2020; Accepted: 6 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in December 2019 in China, and has led to thousands of mortalities globally each day. While the innate immune response serves as the first line of defense, viral clearance requires activation of adaptive immunity, which employs B and T cells to provide sanitizing immunity. SARS-CoV-2 has a potent arsenal of mechanisms used to counter this adaptive immune response through processes, such as T cells depletion and T cell exhaustion. These phenomena are most often observed in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients, pointing towards a link between T cell function and disease severity. Moreover, neutralizing antibody titers and memory B cell responses may be short lived in many SARS-CoV-2 patients, potentially exposing these patients to re-infection. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of B and T cells immune responses and activity in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis.
  • The Humoral Immune System Structure and Diversity Discussion

    The Humoral Immune System Structure and Diversity Discussion

    The Humoral Immune system Structure and Diversity Discussion: Introduction Our immune system protects our bodies from the harmful affects of a dizzying array of disease causing pathogens. Although our skin and mucous membranes serve as primary defense systems, many antigens are find their way into our bodies. Our immune system has developed an extensive array of cells, and sophisticated processes that help identify, and eliminate foreign invaders. Given that there are essentially billions of possible antigens it is indeed amazing that we can respond to so many in an efficient and timely manner. What is most impressive of our immune system is it’s specificity, memory, and flexibility. This lesson plan will seek to explore part of our immune system: the humoral system. We will seek to understand how gene expression within the immunoglobulin variable regions is able to produce the billions of antibodies that defend us. A. Two modes of response (See Figure 1 & 1a.) ( *Teacher note 1) The Immunity of the body is achieved by two distinct methods of immune response: the cellular immune system and the humoral immune system. The two systems work through different methods and types of lymphocytes to protect the body from invading pathogens. 1. Cellular Immunity System: (see Figure 1 &1a for overview of Cytotoxic T cells, Helper T cells and B-lymphocytes. Note the use of Helper T cells in both cases. Refer to role of the AIDS virus in the obstruction of the work of these Helper cells.)The Cellular immune system possesses three very effective sets of killing cells. They are termed T lymphocytes because they are formed in the Thymus gland.
  • Acquired Immunity

    Acquired Immunity

    TDC 5TH SEM MAJOR PAOER 5.3 BASIC IMMUNOLOGICAL CONCEPT BY: DR. LUNA PHUKAN In immunology, an antigen (Ag) is a molecule or molecular structure, such as may be present at the outside of a pathogen, that can be bound by an antigen- specific antibody or B cell antigen receptor.[1] The presence of antigens in the body normally triggers an immune response.[2] The Ag abbreviation stands for an An illustration that shows how antigens induce the immune system response by antibody generator. interacting with an antibody that matches the molecular structure of an antigen An antibody is made up of two heavy chains and two light chains. The unique variable region allows an antibody to recognize its matching antigen. The immune system is a host defense system comprising many biological structures and processes within an organism that protects against disease. To function properly, an immune system must detect a wide variety of agents, known as pathogens, from viruses to parasitic worms, and distinguish them from the organism's own healthy tissue. In many species, there are two major subsystems of the immune system: the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system. Both subsystems use humoral immunity and cell-mediated immunity to perform their functions. In humans, the blood–brain barrier, blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and similar fluid–brain barriers separate the peripheral immune system from the neuroimmune system, which protects the brain. Pathogens can rapidly evolve and adapt, and thereby avoid detection and neutralization by the immune system; however, multiple defense mechanisms have also evolved to recognize and neutralize pathogensDisorders of the immune system can result in autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases and cancer.
  • Saskatchewan Immunization Manual Chapter 13 – Principles of Immunology April 2012

    Saskatchewan Immunization Manual Chapter 13 – Principles of Immunology April 2012

    Saskatchewan Immunization Manual Chapter 13 – Principles of Immunology April 2012 1.0 THE IMMUNE SYSTEM...................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 CELLS OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 LYMPHATIC SYSTEM................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 TYPES OF IMMUNITY .................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 ACTIVE IMMUNITY..................................................................................................................... 4 1.6 INNATE IMMUNITY ‐ “FIRST” IMMUNE DEFENSE ............................................................................. 5 TABLE 1: INNATE IMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................................... 5 1.7 ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ‐ “SECOND” IMMUNE DEFENCE ...................................................................... 6 1.8 ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ‐ CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY (CMI)................................................................ 6 1.9 ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY ‐ HUMORAL IMMUNITY ................................................................................. 7 1.10 ANTIBODIES ............................................................................................................................
  • Humoral Immunity (Nature, Mechanisms and Kinetics)

    Humoral Immunity (Nature, Mechanisms and Kinetics)

    Humoral Immunity (Nature, Mechanisms and Kinetics) RAKESH SHARDA Department of Veterinary Microbiology NDVSU College of Veterinary Science & A.H., MHOW Nature of Ag/Ab Reactions • Lock and Key Concept http://www.med.sc.edu:85/chime2/lyso-abfr.htm • Non-covalent Bonds – Hydrogen bonds – Electrostatic bonds – Van der Waal forces – Hydrophobic bonds – Require very close fit • Multiple Bonds • Reversible • Specificity Source: Li, Y., Li, H., Smith-Gill, S. J., Mariuzza, R. A., Biochemistry 39, 6296, 2000 Specificity • The ability of an individual antibody combining site to react with only one antigenic determinant. • The ability of a population of antibody molecules (polyclonal antiserum) to distinguish minor structural differences between the original antigen or hapten and similar, yet structurally different antigens or haptens. Cross Reactivity • The ability of an individual Ab combining site to react with more than one antigenic determinant. • The ability of a population of Ab molecules to react with more than one Ag. • The two may share one or more identical epitopes or one or more structurally similar, yet different epitopes Cross reactions Anti-A Anti-A Anti-A Ab Ab Ab Ag A Ag B Ag C Similar epitope Shared epitope AFFINITY, AVIDITY AND VALENCY • Affinity refers to strength of binding of single epitope on an antigen to its paratope in an antibody molecule. It refers to the intrinsic reaction between paratope and epitope • Avidity refers to total binding strength of an antibody molecule to an antigen. Thus avidity (strength of binding) is influenced by both affinity (Ka of single binding site) x Valence of interaction (number of interacting binding sites).
  • Cancer and the Immune System: the Vital Connection

    Cancer and the Immune System: the Vital Connection

    CANCER AND THE IMMUNE SYSTEM THE VITAL CONNECTION A PUBLICATION FROM CANCER AND THE IMMUNE SYSTEM: THE VITAL CONNECTION Copyright © 1987 by Cancer Research Institute All rights reserved Revised 2003, 2016 Jill O’Donnell-Tormey, Ph.D. CEO and Director of Scientific Affairs Cancer Research Institute Matthew Tontonoz, M.A. Science Writer Cancer Research Institute CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: REVISITING THE “C” WORD.........................................3 PART 1: WHAT IS CANCER?......................................................................4 1.1 Cell Division, Mutations, and Cancer.......................................................4 1.2 How Cancer Develops.............................................................................6 1.3 Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the U.S..............................................8 1.4 Cancer and the Immune System.............................................................9 PART 2: THE HUMAN IMMUNE SYSTEM.................................................12 2.1 Innate Immunity: Our First Line of Defense...........................................13 2.2 Adaptive Immunity: Learning the Enemy’s Tricks..................................15 2.3 Inflammation: Linking Innate and Adaptive Immunity............................17 2.4 The Humoral Immune Response: Making Antibodies...........................20 2.5 The Cellular Immune Response: Making “Killer” T Cells.......................22 2.6 Tolerance and the Problem of Autoimmunity.........................................24 PART 3: CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY.....................................................26