DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of Kosi Floods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case of Kosi Floods Understanding Public System Management In Bihar: The Case of Kosi Floods Independent Research Project Submitted to Prof. Shambu Prasad & SRC Members By Joseph Sebastian U307021 2/7/2009 Acknowledgment I take this opportunity to thank Xavier Institute of Management (XIM), Bhubaneswar, for providing us with the opportunity of pursuing an area of academic interest in the form of an Independent Research Project (IRP). I owe a special thanks to my guide, Dr. C. Shambu Prasad, for allowing me to undertake the IRP on the Kosi floods in Bihar, despite the restrictions imposed by the distance and the class schedule to go there for data collection and interview. Without his guidance and suggestions it would not have been possible for me to complete this work. I am grateful to Prof. Shambu for introducing me to the actor‐oriented approaches and guiding me to apply the actor‐oriented tools for the institutional analysis of Kosi flood management system. I also express my sincere gratitude to the student research committee (SRC) members, Prof. S. Peppin and prof. S.S Singh for their guidance and suggestions. I am greatly indebted to Dr. Dinesh Kumar Mishra on whose writings I have relied upon as the most authentic account on the Kosi River and flood management. His painstaking efforts for two decades on behalf of the embankment victims have produced the most researched and complete accounts of the river, the embankment strategy and the plight of the embankment victims. I am especially grateful to him for his valuables suggestions on the timeline of the events related to Kosi River and flood control measures prepared based on his book, ‘Trapped! Between the Devil and Deep Waters’. Finally I also thank my companions for all their assistance, support and encouragement. Joseph Sebastian 11th February 2009 ii Table of Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………vi 1.Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1Scope of the Paper ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.2Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2. A Brief Overview of the Kosi river and Flood Control Measures…………………………………………………………4 2.1The Characteristics of the Kosi River……………………………………………………………………………………………….4 2.2 The History of Flood Control Measures in Kosi Basin……………………………………………………………………..4 2.2.1The Colonial Era: Pre‐independence…………………………………………………………………………………………4 2.2.2 The Post‐independence…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 3. Actor‐oriented Approaches for Institutional Innovation……..…………………………………………………………….8 3.1The Rationale for Actor‐oriented Tools…………………………………………………………………………………………..8 3.2 The Actor‐Oriented Approach……………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 3.3 The List of Major Actors in Kosi Flood Management System………………………………………………………..10 3.4 Actor Linkage Map……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 3.4.1Actor Linkage Map of the Kosi Project……………………………………………………………………………………11 3.5 Actor Linkage Matrix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 3.6 Determinants Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 4. Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15 4.1The Saga of Neglect and Mismanagement…………………………………………………………………………………….15 4.1.2 Human Folly and Kusaha Breach……………………………………………………………………………………………15 4.1.3 Plethora of Institutions: Messy affair of…………………………………………………………………………………17 4.2 The issue of Indo‐Nepal Coordination………………………………………………………………………………………….18 iii 4.3 The Harvesters of the forth Crop………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 4.4 The Social Cost of the Embankments…………………………………………………………………………………………..21 4.4.1 Ecological Disaster, Reduction in agriculture Productivity…………………………………………………..21 4.4.2 Performance of the Irrigation Projects………………………………………………………………………………..21 4.4.3 Human Tragedy……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………22 5. Public System Management in Bihar……………………………………………………………………………………………..24 5.1 Key Indicators: Health of the State…………………………………………………………………………………………..24 5.2 Reasons for Backwardness……………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 5.2.1 The Mismanagement of the Social Delivery System…………………………………………………………25 5.2.2 The Burden of Inertia………………………………………………………………………………………………………..25 5.3 The Silver Lining: The Success Stories of Participatory Governance…………………………………………..26 5.4 The Way Forward: Institutional Innovation……………………………………………………………………………….27 6. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………28 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….29 Annexure………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………31 Annexure 1: The integrated Timeline of Various Events Related to Kosi Project……………………………………31 Annexure 2: Determinants Diagram: Alternative Flood Management…………………………………………………..41 Annexure 3: Determinants Diagram: India‐Nepal Link…………………………………………………………………………..42 iv List of Acronyms ALM Actor Linkage Matrix BMA Barh Mukti Abhiyan CAG Comptroller and Auditor General CIHRCP Central Irrigation and Hydrodynamic Research Centre Poona CWC Central Water Commission CWPC Central Water Power Commission CWINC Central Water Irrigation and Navigation Commission CGWB Central Ground Water Board CSO Civil Society Organisations EKMC Easter Kosi Main Canal GFCC Ganga Flood Control Commission GoB Government of Bihar GoI Government of India GoN Government of Nepal HDI Human Development Index KMSS Kosi Mukti Sangharsh Samiti KHLC Kosi High Level Committee KPVP Kosi Pirit Vikas Pradhikar MEA Ministry of External Affairs NHDR National Human Development Report PWD Public Works Department WKC Western Kosi Canal WRD Water Resource Department v Executive Summary On 18th August 2008, the Kosi River breached its embankment at Kusaha in Nepal, upstream of the Kosi barrage, changed its course and shifted over 120 km eastwards, rediscovering channels it had abandoned over 250 years ago. The surging waters of Kosi got the state administration completely unawares despite warnings and its disaster preparedness was in total disarray. The Kosi flood was a severe indictment of the public system management in Bihar. Apart from the misery and destruction it unleashed, for once, the 2008 flood exposed the culture of neglect and the burden of inertia that characterize the public administration in Bihar as never before. It also exposed the myth of the ‘only we know’ attitude of the ‘experts’. The paper underlines the necessity of system approach in dealing with complex issues such as Kosi floods. Any development intervention in a natural context must be treated as a ‘natural innovation system’. The study proposes the actor‐oriented approaches and tools as effective instruments in promoting institutional innovations by mapping the linkages and information among the actors, coalitions and networks. Actor‐oriented tools can thus effect institutional change by altering the perceptions of development actors and encouraging them to engage with the social and political context of their activities in a holistic and constructive manner. The actor oriented tools can be used in tantrum with the traditional project management tools for diagnosis, planning, implementation and monitoring of any project. Moving beyond treating the case of Kosi floods as an isolated, one of its kind system failures, effort has been made in this paper to link the Kosi story to the extreme backwardness of the state. Bihar’s backwardness cannot be comprehended with umbrella terms such as ‘poverty’ or ‘Bihari politics’. They fail to capture the role of institutions and the alienation of people and civil society from them. What is really aimed at in this paper is to bring forth the importance of the role of institutions and the underlying processes for the successful implementation and management of a development intervention. vi 1. Introduction On 18th August 2008, the Kosi River breached its embankment at Kusaha in Nepal, upstream of the Kosi barrage, changed its course and shifted over 120 km eastwards, rediscovering channels it had abandoned over 150 years ago. This was the channel in which Kosi flowed between the 1850 and 1874. The surging waters of Kosi got the state administration completely unawares despite warnings and its disaster preparedness was in total disarray. According to the official sources, till 23 January 2009, 993 villages spread over 35 blocks in 5 districts were hit by the resultant floods. The flood waters engulfed 33.29 lakhs people residing over 3.4 lakh hectares of land, killing 530 persons and 10,844 cattle besides destroying 2,85,798 houses. While the Chief Minister, Nitish Kumar described the flood as a “pralaya”, catastrophe, the Prime Minister declared it a “national calamity” and sanctioned 1000 cr. towards relief and rehabilitation. Whatever name one may call it, 2008 flood was above all a severe indictment of the public system management in Bihar. After every disaster, what occupies the centre stage is the acrimony and blame game between state and central governments and among various departments within the state. Apart from the misery and destruction it unleashed, for once the 2008 flood has highlighted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appeal Coordinating Office India
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 E-mail: [email protected] Appeal Coordinating Office India Floods in Bihar, India – ASIN84 Appeal Target: US$ 1,761,189 Geneva, 1 September 2008 Dear Colleagues, Over two million people are reported to be affected by floods in Bihar, India, the worst floods to hit this region in decades. A BBC report of 30 August notes that the death toll has risen to 70, and at least 124,000 people have been evacuated to safer grounds. The Save the Children Alliance reports that over 500,000 children have been put at risk. Information below has been received from ACT member Church’s Auxiliary for Social Action (CASA), which is in the process of mobilizing a substantial emergency response. The Kosi River, which gathers water from some of the highest mountains in Nepal, including Everest, and enters India in north Bihar, changed its course, and shifted over 120 km eastwards on 18 August 2008. In the process it has rendered useless more than 300 km of embankments that had been built to control its waters, and picked up a channel it had abandoned over 200 years ago. The effect has been enormous, inundating numerous towns and villages that were considered “flood safe areas”, and that had not seen such floods for decades It is a catastrophe far greater than the annual floods. People from various villages have taken shelter along the roads as most of their houses have been washed away in the flood waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012-13
    Government of India Ministry of Water Resources Ganga Flood Control Commission ANNUAL REPORT 2012-13 Patna Table of Contents From Chairman’s Desk (ii) Highlights of the year 2012-13 (iii) 1. Introduction 1 2. Comprehensive Plans for Flood Management 10 3. Assessment of Adequacy of Waterways Under Road and Rail Bridges 12 4. Flood Management Programme 13 5. Appraisal of Flood Management Schemes 15 6. Monitoring of Ongoing Flood Management Schemes 22 7. River Management Activities and Works related to Border Areas 26 8. Cooperation with Neighbouring Countries 33 9. Promotion of use of Hindi 37 10. Participation in Trainings, Workshops and Seminars 39 11. Representation of Ganga Flood Control Commission in Various Committees 40 i From Chairman’s Desk The Ganga basin which covers the States of Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi occurrence of floods in one part or the other is an annual feature during the monsoon period. Since the Ganga is an inter-state river, it is necessary to prepare integrated plans to tackle the flood and related problems of the basin and to ensure their implementation in a co-ordinated manner. Ganga Flood Control Commission was created in 1972 as a subordinate office of Ministry of Water Resources. Since its inception, GFCC has played a vital role in assisting the States to manage the floods in the Ganga basin. As a part of its mandate it has prepared comprehensive plans of all the 23 river systems of the Ganga basin and sent the same to the State Governments for taking follow up action on the suggestions made in these plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Preparedness in Bihar 2017
    Flood Preparedness in Bihar 2018 Disaster Management Department Government of Bihar Contents •Initial Forecast by IMD •Floods in Bihar •Flood Preparedness by Disaster Management Department, Govt. of Bihar •SOP for Flood Preparedness First Stage Forecast of Southwest Monsoon Season-2018 Rainfall by IMD • Quantitatively, the monsoon seasonal rainfall is likely to be 97% of the Long Period Average (LPA) with an error of ± 5%. • Forecast assessment suggests 42% of probability for near normal monsoon rainfall. • IMD will issue the update forecasts in early June, 2018 as a part of the second stage long range forecast of monsoon rainfall. Extremely F.P. Flood Prone Supaul Araria Total Districts – 38 Madhepura Purnea Flood Prone Districts - 28 W. Vaishali Champaran Begusarai Saran Katihar Nalanda Madhubani Sheikhpura Sitamarhi Kishanganj Khagaria Bhojpur Muzzafarpur Lakhisarai Bhagalpur Patna E. Siwan Champaran Samastipur Gopalganj Katihar Buxar Saharsa Darbhanga Population affected by Major Floods Population Affected Year District Affected (in Lakhs) 2004 20 212.99 2007 22 244.42 2008 18 50.93 2009 16 22.03 2011 25 71.43 2013 20 72.34 2014 20 30.00 2016 31 88.23 2017 19 171.64 Flood Response 2017 • 19 out of 38 districts affected • 187 out of 534 Blocks affected • Death toll: 649 • Population affected: 171.64 lakh • Deployment of Army, NDRF and SDRF in flood response: Army NDRF SDRF No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Teams Boats Teams Boats Teams Boats 7 70 28 118 16 92 Flood Response 2017 Relief Camps • 1358 relief camps were setup for 4.2 lakh people • Cooked meal, medical, toilet facilities • Providing clothing, utensils, soaps, hair oil, comb, sanitary napkins etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Madhubani District, Bihar State
    भूजल सूचना पुस्तिका मधुबनी स्जला, बबहार Ground Water Information Booklet Madhubani District, Bihar State ADMINISTRATIVE MAP BIHAR STATE N MADHUBANI DISTRICT, BIHAR W E Ganga R. Harlakhi S Ladania Madhwapur Jaynagar Basopatti Laukaha Khajauli Laukahi Babubarhi Benipatti Rajnagar Andhratharhi Phulparas MADHUBANI Bisfi Ghoghordiha Jhanjharpur Pandaul LEGEND District Boundary Lakhnaur Block Boundary Madhepur River Road Km.8 0 8 16 Km. Railway District HQ. SCALE Block HQ. के न्द्रीय भमू मजल बो셍 ड Central Ground water Board Ministry of Water Resources जल संसाधन मंत्रालय (Govt. of India) (भारि सरकार) Mid-Eastern Region मध्य-पर्वू ी क्षेत्र Patna पटना मसिंबर 2013 September 2013 PREPARED BY - Shri S. Sahu Sc. B UNDER SUPERVISION OF - Shri A.K.Agrawal, Sc-’D’ CARTOGRAPHY - Shri Lokendra Kumar, Draughtsman UPDATED BY - ShriCONTENTS S.N. Dwivedi, Sc- C & Dr.Fakhre Alam, STA(Hg) 2 DISTRICT AT A GLANCE 5 - 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 - 9 1.1.1 Location, Area and Population 1.2 Basin/Sub-Basin and Drainage 1.4 Landuse Pattern, Agriculture and Irrigation Practices 1.5 Activities Carried out by CGWB 2.0 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL 9-10 3.0 GEOMORPHOLOGY AND SOIL TYPES 10 4.0 GROUND WATER SCENARIO 11 - 16 4.1 Hydrogeology 4.2 Depth to Water Level 4.2 Ground water Resources 4.3 Status of Ground Water development 4.4 Ground Water Quality 5.0 GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 16 - 18 5.1 Ground Water development 5.2 Design of Tube Wells 5.2.1 Sallow Tube Wells 5.2.2 Deep Tube Wells 5.3 Water Conservation and Artificial Recharge: 6.0 GROUND WATER RELATED ISSUES AND PROBLEMS: 18 7.0 MASS AWARENESS AND TRAINING PROGRAMME: 18 8.0 AREA NOTIFIED BY CENTRAL GROUND WATER AUTHORITY/ STATE GROUND WATER AUTHORITY 19 9.0 RECOMMENDATION 19 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Principal Rivers and their Tributaries in Madhubani District Table 2 Rainfall Pattern in the Madhubani district during 1997-98 Table 3 Replenishable ground water resource in the district as on 31st March- 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.09.08 Sit
    SITUATION REPORT No. 5 FLOODS 2008 OVERALL SITUATION The humanitarian situation in Bihar continues to be very grim. As of 15th September, one more district – Kishanganj - is affected, bringing the total number of affected districts in Bihar to 17. The five worst affected districts are Supaul, Madehpura, Araria, Saharsa and Purnea. While the first three districts are flood affected, Saharsa and Purnea are comparatively less affected, but are hosting a large number of the displaced population from the neighbouring affected districts. The water level in the flood affected areas has been receding as Kosi River is in a falling trend, with not much rains in its catchment areas. However, rainfall predicted for this month in Bihar, could lead to further flooding, thus affect ing the relief activities by agencies. In addition to the floods in Bihar, annual rainfall continues to cause floods in Assam and Uttar Pradesh. MAP OF FLOODS IN BIHAR (((IN I 1 Sit Rep – Floods- 16 September 2008 DAMAGE DETAILS BIHAR As of 15 Sept, the damage details in the state of Bihar are (central government figures): · Population affected – 4,349,000 · No. of human lives lost - 125 · No. of districts affected - 17 · No. of villages affected – 2,451 · No. of livestock/ cattle lost - 131 · No. of houses destroyed (fully) – 319,025 · Cropped area affected (in ha) – 290,000 As of 16 Sept, the damage details in worst affected districts are (district government figures): SN. Damages Supaul Madhepura Araria Saharsa Purnea Affected Population 1 No of 5 11 4 6 9 Blocks Affected 2 No of 73 130 64 59 77 Panchayats Affected 3 No of 243 378 98 169 133 Villages Affected 4 Population 893790 1155000 391328 438789 145000 Affected 5 No of 178758 231000 78266 87758 29000 Families Affected 6 Livestock 450000 300000 80000 161000 40000 affected 7 Area 26253 41526 6608 16009 13823 Affected (in Ha) 8 No.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2015, Pp. 18-25 © Social Research Foundation Environmental Catastrophe, Human Rights and Governance: a Sociological Insight in the ‘Sorrow of Bihar’ Manish K
    18 Research Process 3(2) July –December 2015, pp. 18-25 © Social Research Foundation Environmental Catastrophe, Human Rights and Governance: a Sociological insight in the ‘Sorrow of Bihar’ Manish K. Verma Professor and Head, Department of Sociology Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University) Vidya Vihar, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow E-mail: [email protected] Bihar is marred with incessant catastrophe by recurring floods from the river Kosi flowing from the terrain of Himalaya adjoining Nepal. The river Kosi along with other sister rivers like Gandak, Burhi Gandak, Bagmati, Kamla Balan, Mahananda and Adhwara group of rivers have earned notoriety due to their unruly, turbulent and unpredictable behaviour. Year after year, in the rainy season, water flood in from Nepal swallowing millions of hectares of land, thereby completely uprooting those living in these areas.The recurring natural catastrophe poses a serious threat to the environment, creating human rights problems for inhabitants and also for the governance system. In this background, the paper focuses on five major aspects. “The Genesis of disaster” elaborates the genesis of the problem of inundation related to Kosi River in the Indo-Nepal region. “The History of Kosi Disaster” highlights some earlier major inundation affecting the state of Bihar and the repercussions in its aftermath. Violation of the basic human rights of the people of the region is covered in the successive part, “Human Rights Concern”. The next penultimate part, “Governance Problems” analyse the issues pertaining to mis-management of relief and rehabilitation measures and lack of consensus between India and Nepal to evolve a common-minimum programme to solve the problem The last part “The Solution” suggests some specific ground level, most pertinent and useful remedial measures to solve the problem .
    [Show full text]
  • Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment
    Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 67668-SAS Report No. 67668-SAS Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GANGES STRATEGIC BASIN ASSESSMENT: A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks b Report No. 67668-SAS Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks World Bank South Asia Regional Report The World Bank Washington, DC iii GANGES STRATEGIC BASIN ASSESSMENT: A Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks Disclaimer: © 2014 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Disaster and Its Impact on the People in Kosi Region, Bihar
    © 2019 IJRAR May 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) FLOOD DISASTER AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PEOPLE IN KOSI REGION, BIHAR Dr. Sanjiv Kumar Research Fellow Univ. Deptt. of Geography, T.M.B.U., Bhagalpur Introduction The Kosi, a trans-boundary river between Nepal and India is often referred to as the “Sorrow of Bihar”. The flow of the river contains excessive silt and sand, resulting in changing the courses of the river. During the past, the river has kept on changing its courses between Purnea district in the east and Darbhanga and Madhubani districts in the west. The recent disaster was created by the breach in the eastern Kosi embankment upstream of the Indian border at Kursela in the neighbouring Nepal on the 18th of August 2008. A tragedy of unparalleled dimension unleashed was over three million people living in 995 villages spreading in seven districts of Kosi region, viz. Supaul, Araria, Madhepura, Saharsa, Purnia, Khagaria and Katihar. Objectives: The purpose of the paper is to investigate the damage caused by the devastating floods due to the turbulent river Kosi recurrently and its impact on the socio-economic life of the people inhabiting in the region which is densely populated but with poor economy. The objective refers to the sustainability of an agricultural region to the occurrence of a natural disaster. The objective is to achieve in order to create a sustainable system in environmental, social and economic terms. The other objective aims to preserve or improve characteristics of the environment such as biodiversity, soil, and water and air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report- Community Participation of Embankment Surveillance
    Volume-I FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Joint Director, Flood Management Improvement Support Centre Water Resources Department 2nd Floor, Jal Sansadhan Bhawan Anisabad, Patna-800002 Tel.: 91612-2256999, 91612-2254802 JPS Associates (P) Ltd. New Delhi Acknowledgement We at JPS take opportunity to thank all the officials at WRD namely Mr. Er Indu Bhusan Kumar, Chief Engineer (Planning and Monitoring) Mr. Narendra Prasad Mandal, Additional Project Director (BAPEPS), Official in BAPEPS namely Mr. Ravi Kumar Gupta, State Project Specialist (Environment), Officials at FMISC Mr. A.K.Samaiyar (Ex-Joint Director), Mr. Sitaram Agarwal (Ex-Joint Director), Er. Anil Kumar (Deputy Director I), Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh (Ex-Deputy Director), Mr. Nagan Prasad (Joint Director), Mr. Zakauallah (Asst.Director), Mr. Mukesh Mathur (GIS Expert) and Mr. Syed Niyaz Khurram (Web Master) for their able guidance and constant support to us in the conduct of the assignment in a smooth manner. We are also thankful to WRD field officials Mr. Prakash Das (Chief Engineer), Birpur Division, Mr. Vijender Kumar (Chief Engineer) Samastipur Division, Mr. Vijender Kumar (Executive Er. Birpur Division), Mr. Vinod Kumar (Executive Er. Nirmali Division) and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar (Executive Er.) Jhanjharpur Division and all the Asst. Engineers and the Junior Divisions of all the 11 Field Divisions for their constant support and hospitality to our team of experts and field staff during the conduct of assignment at the field level. Our thanks are also due to SRC members, Mr. Sachidanand Tiwari (Embankment Expert), and Mr. Santosh Kumar (Hydrologist), Mr. Bimalendu Kumar .Sinha, Flood Management Advisor (FMISC) and Mr. S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Bihar Floods 2017 Immediate Needs Assessment and Inclusion Monitoring of Responses Towards Affected Dalits, Minorities & Adivasis in Araria and Kishanganj
    Draft for Discussion Bihar Floods 2017 Immediate Needs Assessment and Inclusion Monitoring of Responses towards affected Dalits, Minorities & Adivasis in Araria and Kishanganj ( 31st August - 12th September) Prepared by - National Dalit watch-National Campaign on Dalit human Rights, All India Dalit Mahila Adhikar Manch & Jan Jagran Shakti Sangathan 1 Content Introduction 1- Floods 2017 2- Response by government 3- Why Immediate Needs assessment and Inclusion Monitoring ? 4- Methodology and tools 5- Coverage and Duration of the assessment 6- Locating Dalits, Minorities in flood affected districts of Bihar 7- Findings from Immediate needs assessment & Inclusion monitoring of post Bihar Flood response a- Trends of Losses b- Early Warning, Rescue and Evacuation c- Immediate relief Immediate Shelter - Provision of Relief Camps - Provision of Community Kitchen - Provision of Dry Ration and Food Packets - Provision of drinking water, sanitation and hygiene facilities - Provision of immediate health support services - Process of relief distribution - Assessment of Losses and Post flood response from government authorities - 8-Urgent demands from affected communities Immediate food assistance Shelters Health Restoration of Public services Early recovery & immediate compensation 9-Recommendation for dignified recovery and Rehabilitation Implementation level Practice level Policy level Annexure List of Relief Camps & Team Involved 2 INTRODUCTION In the mid of august when Nation was planning to celebrate its 70th independence Day and waiting for joy and happiness. State of Bihar has faced severe flood due to deep depression over Bay of Bengal with the heavy rain brought the sadness to. The heavy rains from 10-14th august and flood waters have stranded the life for almost 15 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in Bihar
    Internal Report HI A ARE Internal Report Himalayan Adaptation, Water and Resilience Research Workshop Proceedings The Agony of Rivers: Floods in Bihar 3 September 2015, Patna, Bihar, India 1 About ICIMOD The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, ICIMOD, is a regional knowledge development and learning centre serving the eight regional member countries of the Hindu Kush Himalayas – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, and Pakistan – and based in Kathmandu, Nepal. Globalisation and climate change have an increasing influence on the stability of fragile mountain ecosystems and the livelihoods of mountain people. ICIMOD aims to assist mountain people to understand these changes, adapt to them, and make the most of new opportunities, while addressing upstream-downstream issues. We support regional transboundary programmes through partnership with regional partner institutions, facilitate the exchange of experience, and serve as a regional knowledge hub. We strengthen networking among regional and global centres of excellence. Overall, we are working to develop an economically and environmentally sound mountain ecosystem to improve the living standards of mountain populations and to sustain vital ecosystem services for the billions of people living downstream – now, and for the future. ICIMOD gratefully acknowledges the support of its core donors: the Governments of Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Executive Summary
    1. ExecutiveExecutive Summary Summary n Ninety six rice entries comprising of elite eastern region. Wheat genotypes – NW5054 (5.42 genotypes and high yielding varieties of different t/ha), RAJ 4250 (5.36 t/ha), HD3076 (5.11 t/ha) and duration were evaluated under aerobic condition HD3118 (5.09 t/ha) were identified promising as and 8 rice genotypes were found promising for compared to check varieties HD 2733 (4.41 t/ha), aerobic situation (productivity 2.18 to 4.62 t/ha). HI 1563 (4.36 t/ha), PBW 343 (4.34 t/ha) & PBW n Forty two rice genotypes were evaluated for 373 (3.87 t/ha). drought stress at reproductive stage. Rice n Performance of wheat genotypes (C306, HD genotypes viz., IR 88964-24-2-1-4 (4.73 t/ha), IR 2967, PBW 550 and HD 2733) under predicted 88966-43-1-1-4 (4.33 t/ha) and IR 88964-11-2-2-3 climate change (elevated CO2, 475 ppm) showed (4.07 t/ha) under AYTGT 120 trial and IR 88867- that elevated CO2 has positive effect in terms of 4-1-1-4 (4.76 t/ha) and IR 88867-9-1-1-4 (4.55 t/ more grain numbers (50.3 nos/panicle compared ha) under AYT 100-120 trails showed tolerance to to 44.6 nos/panicle in control), percentage of filled water stress (drought) condition at reproductive grains (94.6% compared to 94.03% in control) and stage as compared to check varieties – Lalat, IR64, grain yield (4.06 t/ha compared to 2.86 t/ha in Swarna, BPT 5204, Rajendra Sweta, MTU 1010 control).
    [Show full text]