DOCSLIB.ORG

Smaug Giganteus, Giant Dragon Lizard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smaug Giganteus, Giant Dragon Lizard The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T5336A110315393 Scope: Global Language: English Smaug giganteus, Giant Dragon Lizard Assessment by: Mouton, P.L.F.N. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Mouton, P.L.F.N. 2017. Smaug giganteus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T5336A110315393. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Cordylidae Taxon Name: Smaug giganteus (A. Smith, 1844) Synonym(s): • Cordylus giganteus A. Smith, 1844 Common Name(s): • English: Giant Dragon Lizard, Giant Girdled Lizard, Giant Spiny-tailed Lizard, Giant Zonure, Sungazer • French: Cordyle géant, Lézard à queue épineuse géant Taxonomic Notes: Previously contained within the genus Cordylus (Stanley et al. 2011). This species represents a distinct and deeply divergent lineage in the genus Smaug (Stanley and Bates 2014). Assessment Information Red List Category & Criteria: Vulnerable A2c ver 3.1 Year Published: 2017 Date Assessed: May 16, 2013 Justification: A reduction in population size of at least 30% during the last 27 years (three generations) is inferred from the continuous habitat destruction in the Grassland Biome [A2c]. In addition, it is likely that a large part of the population exists in fragmented islands of grassland habitat between croplands. Previously Published Red List Assessments 1996 – Vulnerable (VU) http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T5336A11122298.en 1994 – Vulnerable (V) Geographic Range Range Description: Endemic to South Africa, where it is found only in the grasslands of the northern Free State (De Waal 1978) and the southwestern parts of Mpumalanga (Jacobsen 1989). Records of this species in KwaZulu- Natal (e.g. Bourquin 2004) apparently all refer to introduced populations that did not become established, and there are no confirmed records of natural populations in that province (Armstrong 2011). A record for Witsieshoek (2828DB) in the Free State and two records for western Lesotho (Ambrose 2006) are considered doubtful. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Smaug giganteus – published in 2017. 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Country Occurrence: Native: South Africa (Free State, Mpumalanga) © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Smaug giganteus – published in 2017. 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Population Newberry and Petersen (1982/83) estimated population size at approximately 300,000. Current Population Trend: Decreasing Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information) One of only a few terrestrial cordylids, inhabiting flat or sloping Highveld grassland where it lives in self- excavated burrows (Branch 1998). Diurnal and insectivorous, although plant material may also be consumed (Jacobsen 1989). Systems: Terrestrial Use and Trade Commercial exploitation for the pet trade is limited and contained (Jacobsen 1989) but remains a permanent threat. Threats (see Appendix for additional information) The areas inhabited by this species are suitable for agriculture, particularly maize and sunflower cultivation, and large areas have been planted, resulting in large scale habitat loss (De Waal 1978, Newberry and Petersen 1982/83). Habitat loss due to agriculture is a continuing threat. Large portions of the grassland habitat are underlain by coal beds of varying quality and extent, and exploitation of coal for fuel has and will result in further habitat loss (Newberry and Petersen 1982/83). In the past this species has also been used by traditional healers (Newberry and Petersen 198/83), but there is uncertainty over the extent of its present use in traditional medicine and witchcraft. Commercial exploitation by the pet trade is limited and contained (Jacobsen 1989), but remains a permanent threat. In the past, fumigating burrows for the control of Yellow Mongoose (Cynictis penicillata) and Suricate (Suricata suricatta) resulted in great losses (Newberry and Petersen 1982/83) and poisoning of this lizard will always remain a threat in agricultural areas. Losses are exacerbated by poor recruitment ability; females reproduce only every second year (Van Wyk 1991). Poor fire management may also affect this species. Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information) This species is listed in CITES Appendix II. Continue with research to develop an effective translocation protocol (Van Wyk 1988). Continuously encourage farmers to protect these animals and to stop all forms of persecution by farm workers (Newberry and Petersen 1982/83). Prohibit the removal of lizards from natural populations. Draft a Species Management Plan (BMP-S). Credits Assessor(s): Mouton, P.L.F.N. Reviewer(s): Bates, M.F. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Smaug giganteus – published in 2017. 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Bibliography Ambrose, D. 2006. Lesotho Annotated Bibliography Section 166: Reptiles Including Annotated Checklist. Mamhlongo Productions, Roma, Lesotho. Armstrong, A.J. 2011. Status of the Sungazer Smaug giganteus in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. African Herp News 54: 1-4. Bates, M.F., Branch, W.R., Bauer, A.M., Burger, M., Marais, J., Alexander, G.J. and de Villiers, M.S. (eds). 2014. Atlas and Red List of the Reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Suricata 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. Bourquin, O. 2004. Reptiles (Reptilia) in KwaZulu-Natal: 1 - diversity and distribution. Durban Museum Novitates 29: 57-103. Branch, W.R. 1998. Field Guide to Snakes and Other Reptiles of Southern Africa. Second Edition. Struik Publishers, Cape Town. De Waal, S.W.P. 1978. The Squamata (Reptilia) of the Orange Free State, South Africa. Memoirs of the National Museum of Bloemfontein 11: 1-160. IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. Jacobsen, N.H.G. 1989. The Distribution and Conservation Status of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Transvaal. Final Report Project TN 6/4/1/30. Chief Directorate of Nature and Environmental Conservation, Pretoria, South Africa. Newbery, R.E. and Petersen, W. 1982/83. Management Proposals: Cordylus giganteus. Internal Report. Transvaal Division Nature Conservation, Pretoria, South Africa. Stanley, E.L. and Bates, M.F. 2014. Here be dragons: a phylogenetic and biogeographical study of the Smaug warreni species complex (Squamata: Cordylidae) in southern Africa. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172(4): 892–909. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12187. Stanley, E.L., Bauer, A.M., Jackson, T.R., Branch, W.R. and Mouton, P. le F.N. 2011. Between a rock and a hard polytomy: Rapid radiation in the rupicolous girdled lizards (Squamata: Cordylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58: 53-70. Van Wyk, J.H. 1988. Cordylus giganteus: species account. In: W.R. Branch (ed.), South African Red Data Book—Reptiles and Amphibians, pp. 77-80. South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 151. CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa. Van Wyk, J.H. 1991. Biennial reproduction in the female viviparous lizard, Cordylus giganteus. Amphibia- Reptilia 12: 329-342. Citation Mouton, P.L.F.N. 2017. Smaug giganteus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T5336A110315393. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Disclaimer To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Smaug giganteus – published in 2017. 4 http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en External Resources For Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the Red List website. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Smaug giganteus – published in 2017. 5 http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T5336A110315393.en Appendix Habitats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Major Season Suitability Habitat Importance? 4. Grassland -> 4.7. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude - Suitable - 4. Grassland -> 4.5. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry - Suitable - Threats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score 1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1. Ongoing Unknown - - Housing & urban areas Stresses:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zootoca Vivipara) in Central Europe: Reproductive Strategies and Natural Hybridization
    SALAMANDRA 46(2) 73–82 Oviparous20 May and 2010 viviparousISSN Zootoca 0036–3375 vivipara in central Europe Identification of a contact zone between oviparous and viviparous common lizards (Zootoca vivipara) in central Europe: reproductive strategies and natural hybridization Dorothea Lindtke1,3 Werner Mayer2 & Wolfgang Böhme3 1) Ecology & Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 2) Molecular Systematics, 1st Zoological Department, Museum of Natural History Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria 3) Herpetology, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany Corresponding author: Dorothea Lindtke, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 24 September 2009 Abstract. The European common lizard, Zootoca vivipara, is one of the very few reptile species with two reproductive modes, viz. viviparity and oviparity. Oviparity in this otherwise viviparous form has been known since 1927 for the allopat- ric Z. v. louislantzi. Only with the discovery of a second oviparous form, Z. v. carniolica, a parapatric occurrence of ovipa- rous and viviparous populations became conceivable. In this study, we (1) detect a contact zone where both forms meet, (2) find evidence for natural hybridization between both reproductive strains, and (3) compare the reproductive strategies of egg-layers and live-bearers independent from environmental interference. Thirty-seven gravid females were captured in a supposed contact zone in Carinthia, Austria, and maintained in the laboratory until oviposition or parturition. Clutch size, embryonic mortality and birth weight of the neonates were compared among the reproductively differentiated samples. Hybrids were identified by intermediate reproductive characteristics. Our results provide the first proof of a contact zone between live-bearing and egg-laying Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyika and Vwaza Reptiles & Amphibians Checklist
    LIST OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS OF NYIKA NATIONAL PARK AND VWAZA MARSH WILDLIFE RESERVE This checklist of all reptile and amphibian species recorded from the Nyika National Park and immediate surrounds (both in Malawi and Zambia) and from the Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve was compiled by Dr Donald Broadley of the Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, in November 2013. It is arranged in zoological order by scientific name; common names are given in brackets. The notes indicate where are the records are from. Endemic species (that is species only known from this area) are indicated by an E before the scientific name. Further details of names and the sources of the records are available on request from the Nyika Vwaza Trust Secretariat. REPTILES TORTOISES & TERRAPINS Family Pelomedusidae Pelusios rhodesianus (Variable Hinged Terrapin) Vwaza LIZARDS Family Agamidae Acanthocercus branchi (Branch's Tree Agama) Nyika Agama kirkii kirkii (Kirk's Rock Agama) Vwaza Agama armata (Eastern Spiny Agama) Nyika Family Chamaeleonidae Rhampholeon nchisiensis (Nchisi Pygmy Chameleon) Nyika Chamaeleo dilepis (Common Flap-necked Chameleon) Nyika(Nchenachena), Vwaza Trioceros goetzei nyikae (Nyika Whistling Chameleon) Nyika(Nchenachena) Trioceros incornutus (Ukinga Hornless Chameleon) Nyika Family Gekkonidae Lygodactylus angularis (Angle-throated Dwarf Gecko) Nyika Lygodactylus capensis (Cape Dwarf Gecko) Nyika(Nchenachena), Vwaza Hemidactylus mabouia (Tropical House Gecko) Nyika Family Scincidae Trachylepis varia (Variable Skink) Nyika,
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
    BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Zootoca Vivipara (Lichtenstein, 1823) in Greece
    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 53-56 (2019) (published online on 10 January 2019) No one ever noticed: First report of Zootoca vivipara (Lichtenstein, 1823) in Greece Ilias Strachinis1,*, Korina M. Karagianni1, Martin Stanchev2, and Nikola Stanchev3 The Viviparous Lizard, Zootoca vivipara (Lichtenstein, declined and in some cases almost gone extinct (e.g. 1823), is a relatively small, ground-dwelling lizard lowland populations in Italy; Agasyan et al., 2010). The belonging to the family Lacertidae. It is the terrestrial current population trend is decreasing and the major reptile with the largest range in the world, extending threat that can occur locally is habitat loss resulting from Ireland in the west, to Japan (Hokkaido Islands) in from agricultural intensification, urbanization and the east, and from Bulgaria in the south to the Barents tourism facilities development (Agasyan et al., 2010). Sea in the north (Kupriyanova et al., 2017; Horreo et The species is protected under the Bern Convention al., 2018). As a highly cold-adapted species (Recknagel (Annex II) and listed on Annex IV of the European et al., 2018) the Viviparous Lizard can be found up to Union Habitat and Species Directive (Agasyan et al., 350km north of the Arctic Circle (Arnold and Ovenden, 2010). 2002) and up to 2900 m a.s.l. (Agasyan et al., 2010). It In the Balkans the species’ distribution appears occurs in a variety of habitats with rich vegetation and scattered (Fig. 1A) as the suitable habitats are mostly adequate humidity, however, in the south margin of its limited in higher altitudes, isolated by lowlands and river range it is restricted to high elevation open landscapes, valleys (Crnobrnja-Isailovic et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Flat Gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320043814 Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique Article in Zootaxa · September 2017 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 CITATIONS READS 2 531 8 authors, including: William R Branch Jennifer Anna Guyton Nelson Mandela University Princeton University 250 PUBLICATIONS 4,231 CITATIONS 7 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andreas Schmitz Michael Barej Natural History Museum of Geneva Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiver… 151 PUBLICATIONS 2,701 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 274 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems View project Ad hoc herpetofauna observations View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jennifer Anna Guyton on 27 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 4324 (1): 142–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4FF9A5F-94A7-4E75-9EC8-B3C382A9128C Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique WILLIAM R. BRANCH1,2,13, JENNIFER A. GUYTON3, ANDREAS SCHMITZ4, MICHAEL F. BAREJ5, PIOTR NASKRECKI6,7, HARITH FAROOQ8,9,10,11, LUKE VERBURGT12 & MARK-OLIVER RÖDEL5 1Port Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 2Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNGAZERS THREATENED? Sungazers Only Reproduce Every Other Year, and the Sungazer Is Endemic (Only Only Produce One Or Two Offspring
    CONSERVATION STATUS: WHY ARE SUNGAZERS THREATENED? Sungazers only reproduce every other year, and The Sungazer is endemic (only only produce one or two offspring. They are viviparous meaning they give birth to live SUNGAZERCordylus giganteus found in one particular country or geographic area) to South Africa. It young. The population is thought to be in OTHER NAMES is found in the highland grasslands decline due to habitat destruction as a result of Giant Zonure, Giant Girdled Lizard or of the north eastern Free State as conversion of grassland to farmland (maize, Ouvolk (Afrikaans - also refers to other well as a small population in south sunflower and other crop farming), illegal Girdled Lizards) western Mpumalanga province. collecting for the pet trade, as well as collection for the muti (traditional medicine) industry. DESCRIPTION The population status is unknown Length but thought to be declining. Conversion/transformation (especially plowing) • up to 35-40cm Globally and nationally the of native grassland is the biggest threat to the Key identification features (adult) Giant Girdled Lizard is classified as species. It has been recorded that animals do not This is the largest of the girdled lizards. It is brown in ECOLOGY Vulnerable (IUCN Red List). Find out seem to return to previously plowed land. colour on the upper surface; merging to straw/yellow more at www.iucnredlist.org colouring along the side of the body and yellow Diet WHAT IS THE EWT DOING TO CONSERVE GIANT underneath. This lizard has four very large, spiny scales on Sungazers eats insects, GIRDLED LIZARDS? the back of the head.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductionreview
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW The evolution of viviparity: molecular and genomic data from squamate reptiles advance understanding of live birth in amniotes James U Van Dyke, Matthew C Brandley and Michael B Thompson School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, A08 Heydon-Laurence Building, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to J U Van Dyke; Email: [email protected] Abstract Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are an ideal model system for testing hypotheses regarding the evolution of viviparity (live birth) in amniote vertebrates. Viviparity has evolved over 100 times in squamates, resulting in major changes in reproductive physiology. At a minimum, all viviparous squamates exhibit placentae formed by the appositions of maternal and embryonic tissues, which are homologous in origin with the tissues that form the placenta in therian mammals. These placentae facilitate adhesion of the conceptus to the uterus as well as exchange of oxygen, carbon dioxide, water, sodium, and calcium. However, most viviparous squamates continue to rely on yolk for nearly all of their organic nutrition. In contrast, some species, which rely on the placenta for at least a portion of organic nutrition, exhibit complex placental specializations associated with the transport of amino acids and fatty acids. Some viviparous squamates also exhibit reduced immunocompetence during pregnancy, which could be the result of immunosuppression to protect developing embryos. Recent molecular studies using both candidate-gene and next-generation sequencing approaches have suggested that at least some of the genes and gene families underlying these phenomena play similar roles in the uterus and placenta of viviparous mammals and squamates.
    [Show full text]
  • Uterine Epithelial Changes During Placentation in the Viviparous Skink Eulamprus Tympanum
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 268:385–400 (2007) Uterine Epithelial Changes During Placentation in the Viviparous Skink Eulamprus tympanum Susan M. Adams,1,2* Sylvia Lui,2 Susan M. Jones,3 Michael B. Thompson,1 and Christopher R. Murphy2 1School of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Research Institute, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia 2School of Medical Sciences (Anatomy and Histology), The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia 3Comparative Endocrinological Research Group, School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia ABSTRACT We used scanning electron microscopy placental differentiation demonstrates a similarity dur- (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to ing gestation in the uterus between oviparous and describe the complete ontogeny of simple placentation simple placental viviparous squamates. J. Morphol. and the development of both the yolk sac placentae and 268:385–400, 2007. Ó 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. chorioallantoic placentae from nonreproductive through postparturition phases in the maternal uterine epithe- KEY WORDS: uterine epithelium; scanning electron lium of the Australian skink, Eulamprus tympanum.We microscopy; skink; plasma membrane transformation; chose E. tympanum, a species with a simple, noninva- placental morphology sive placenta, and which we know, has little net nutrient uptake during gestation to develop hypotheses about placental function and to identify any difference between Viviparity has numerous independent origins in the oviparous and viviparous conditions. Placental dif- vertebrates. Most of these lineages originate more ferentiation into the chorioallantoic placenta and yolk frequently in reptilian evolution than in any other sac placenta occurs from embryonic Stage 29; both pla- vertebrate (Blackburn, 1993; Smith and Shine, centae are simple structures without specialized features 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Giant Girdled Lizard Cordylus Giganteus A
    British Herpetological Society Bulletin, No. 10, 1984 NOTES ON THE GIANT GIRDLED LIZARD CORDYLUS GIGANTEUS A. SMITH JOHAN MARAIS 23IA Langton Road, Montclair, Durban, South Africa The giant girdled lizard, Cordylus giganteus, is one of South Africa's largest and most impressive Cordylids. Though abundant and well known where it occurs, very little has been written about this lizard. Very popular in zoo and private collections and, until recently, easily obtainable from dealers in Europe and U.S.A., the species is now protected throughout most of its range, and it is therefore unlikely that many more specimens will reach the "pet trade" in future. COMMON NAME Giant girdled lizard; sungazer; Lord Derby's girdled lizard; and, in Afrikaans, sonkyker ("sun- watcher") ouvolk ("old people") or skurwejan. Cordylus giganteus RANGE North-eastern Orange Free State and adjacent southern Transvaal. Possibly occurs in bordering areas of Lesotho in the east and the Cape Province in the south. Branch and Patterson (1975) stated that the presence of Cordylus giganteus in the southern Transvaal "is now doubtful". This species is, in fact, abundant in that region. Cordylus giganteus has recently been found in Natal. SIZE Largest specimens measured by De Waal (1978) during his survey were as follows: a male measuring 204 + 172 = 376mm and a female measuring 205 + 181 = 386mm. 30 HABITAT Flat or sloping, mixed to sour grassveld where it excavates its own burrow. The flattened oblong burrow entrances are well-worn and may face any direction. The burrows average 2-3 metres in length and from 30-45cm in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Biochemistry and Body Shape Explain Ontogenetic Variation of Anti
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2016) 219, 1649-1658 doi:10.1242/jeb.130740 RESEARCH ARTICLE Beyond body size: muscle biochemistry and body shape explain ontogenetic variation of anti-predatory behaviour in the lizard Salvator merianae Fábio Cury de Barros1, JoséEduardo de Carvalho2, Augusto Shinya Abe3 and Tiana Kohlsdorf1,* ABSTRACT When facing a predator and after choosing among possible anti- Anti-predatory behaviour evolves under the strong action of natural predatory strategies, animals are likely to adjust the characteristics selection because the success of individuals avoiding predation and intensity of the elected behavioural response according to the essentially defines their fitness. Choice of anti-predatory strategies is perceived level of predation risk (Brown et al., 2006; Greene, 1988; defined by prey characteristics as well as environmental temperature. Martín and López, 2003; Ydenberg and Dill, 1986). Many factors An additional dimension often relegated in this multilevel equation is might influence the choice and intensity of the elected anti- the ontogenetic component. In the tegu Salvator merianae, adults run predatory tactic, such as local conditions [i.e. environmental away from predators at high temperatures but prefer fighting when it is temperature, amount of light/period of day and vegetation cover/ cold, whereas juveniles exhibit the same flight strategy within a wide terrain characteristics (Savino and Stein, 1989; Christensen and thermal range. Here, we integrate physiology and morphology to Persson, 1993; Brodie and Russell, 1999; Shine et al., 2000, 2003; understand ontogenetic variation in the temperature-dependent shift Schulte et al., 2004; Durso and Mullin, 2014)] or type and density of of anti-predatory behaviour in these lizards.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sungazer Lizard, Cordylus Giganteus, in Captivity Gary Fogel Email: [email protected]
    Bull. Chicago Herp. Soc. 35(12):277-280, 2000 Observations on the Giant Sungazer Lizard, Cordylus giganteus, in Captivity Gary Fogel Email: [email protected] In the past few years, it has come to my attention that more light, approximately 15 inches from the ground. I furnished a sungazer lizards have been introduced into the commercial pet heating pad in the center of the cage for autumn and winter trade. For this reason I thought it would be a good time to use, and a large dog bowl for water. Hiding places were share my observations and interactions with this species, in the provided in the form of two clay tiles, 24 inches long, cut in hope that others might benefit from my experience in keeping half lengthwise, to serve as burrows. These lizards live in these lizards. As you may be aware, there is still very little open grassland areas, and hide in underground burrows, rough- written on Cordylus giganteus, compared to other, more popu- ly three feet long, either dug by the lizards themselves, or dug lar, types of lizards. The only articles I’ve seen in herpeto- by other animals and adapted for use by the sungazers. The cultural magazines have been Switak (1995) on the genus flooring of my enclosure was floor tile, over which I placed Cordylus as a whole, and Donovan (1997) on sungazers specifi- artificial turf, except for 12 inches at the front of the enclosure. cally. The Vivarium has never published an article on the This is where I placed the water bowl and I hoped was the genus Cordylus, and popularized reptile books are general in place the animals would use for their bathroom area (they tend their information, often contradicting one another on the facts to use the same spot repeatedly for this activity).
    [Show full text]