DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of the Otmoor Protected Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of the Otmoor Protected Area MANAGEMENT OF THE OTMOOR PROTECTED AREA (OXFORDSHIRE) (MULTIFUNCTIONAL WETLANDS IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES: AN EVALUATION OF VALUES, IMPACTS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE ECOSYSTEM-BASED APPROACH) (NR0112) Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Authors McInnes, R.J., Crane, M., Rodda, H.J.E., Danks, P.W., Hogan, D.V., and Field, A.I. Full Report to Defra NR0112 September 2008 McInnes, et al., 2008 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 W www.wwt.org.uk Reg. charity no. 1030884 This document should be cited as: McInnes, R.J., Crane, M., Rodda, H.J.E., Danks, P.W., Hogan, D.V., and Field, A.I. 2008. Management of the Otmoor protected area (Oxfordshire) (Multifunctional wetlands in agricultural landscapes: An evaluation of values, impacts and the application of the ecosystem-based approach) (NR0112 – Full Report). WWT Report to Defra. Project Reference: NR0112. WWT, Slimbridge, UK. p95. ii NR0112: Management of Otmoor Protected Area CONTENTS Executive Summary v How to use this document viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 An ecosystems approach 1 1.2 Otmoor protected area 2 1.3 Objectives 3 2 Identification of policy objectives 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Policies and drivers 4 2.3 Stakeholder responses 5 2.3.1 Introduction 5 2.3.2 Summary 6 3 Assessment of ecosystem services 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 Regulating: Water purification and waste treatment 8 3.2.1 Introduction 8 3.2.2 Quantification of the ecosystem service 9 3.2.3 Economic evaluation 10 3.3 Regulating: Natural hazard regulation 11 3.3.1 Introduction 11 3.3.2 Quantification of service 11 3.3.3 Economic evaluation 12 3.4 Provisioning: Food production 13 3.4.1 Introduction 13 3.4.2 Quantification and economic evaluation 13 3.5 Cultural: Recreation 14 3.5.1 Introduction 14 3.5.2 Quantification and economic evaluation 14 4 Assessment of uncertainty 16 4.1 Assessment of uncertainty 16 5 Evaluation of an ecosystems approach 20 5.1 Introduction 20 5.2 Methodological observations 20 5.2.1 Data and methodological constraints 20 5.2.2 Causal chains 22 5.2.3 Reasoning and modelling 22 5.3 Participatory framework 22 McInnes, et al., 2008 5.4 Evaluation and application 23 5.5 Conclusions and recommendations 24 Acknowledgements 26 6 References 27 Appendix 1 – Otmoor protected area 32 Appendix 2 – Stakeholder responses 40 Appendix 3 – Conceptual framework for predicting and valuing ecosystem services 53 Appendix 4 – Assessment of ecosystem services 58 Appendix 5 – Soil types found at Otmoor 86 Appendix 6 – Otmoor SSSI citation 87 Appendix 7 – Notes from field visit, November 2006 89 Appendix 8 – Flood estimation handbook catchment descriptors 93 Appendix 9 – Climate change scenario 94 iv NR0112: Management of Otmoor Protected Area EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The ‘Ecosystem Approach’ has been adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity as a framework for sustainable development. In response to this, the application of an ecosystems approach is being progressed by Defra as part of its commitment to the development of a more holistic and integrated policy framework for the natural environment which ensures that the value of ecosystem services is truly recognised across Government. Otmoor protected area covers approximately 1100 hectares of Oxfordshire farmland. The site represents one of the most important wetland areas in central-southern England. The area carries a range of designations and consequently differing management practices. Four land designations represented at the site are: a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), a Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) reserve, land under the Upper Thames Tributaries Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) and agricultural land outside of the ESA. Aims and objectives The information generated by this case study informs the implementation of an ecosystems approach through an assessment of a limited range of ecosystem services and an interrogation of how successfully an ecosystems approach is being applied at the Otmoor protected area. This is achieved through the following objectives: • identification of policy drivers and stakeholder preferences; • assessment of four ecosystem services; • evaluation of uncertainty in assessing ecosystem services and applying an ecosystems approach; and • overall evaluation of the project methodology and how successfully an ecosystems approach is being applied at Otmoor. The results presented are not intended to be definitive, but rather illustrate a method which informs the debate on applying an ecosystems approach. The intention has been to demonstrate an approach to implementing and understanding elements of an ecosystems approach. Therefore, whilst the individual outcomes are all open to question, interrogation and potentially refinement, it is the approach taken which is considered more important than the absolute nature of outcomes. Methodology The methodology drew upon stakeholder consultation (44 structured interviews) and limited field observations (primarily on land-use and soils) combined with desk-based analysis of readily available data. The main rationale for the approach was to investigate the extent to which existing information could be utilised in understanding the application of an ecosystems approach at Otmoor rather than implementing a large, empirically based study. Stakeholder preferences and policy drivers A range of policy drivers influence the delivery of the benefits derived from ecosystem services and the implementation of an ecosystems approach at Otmoor. The views of the majority of relevant sectors of society were canvassed to understand better their understanding of ‘ecosystem services’ and their awareness of the multi-functional benefits delivered by the Otmoor protected area. The concept of ‘ecosystem services’ was alien to the majority of stakeholders interviewed. However when explained as the benefits to people and wildlife provided by a natural area stakeholders were able to identify a range of benefits. The following was generally agreed by those interviewed: conservation of all species should be a priority on Otmoor; flooding should be allowed to occur naturally across all of Otmoor, at least in the long-term; and a large increase in visitors to Otmoor should not be encouraged. The main areas of disagreement were: achieving the appropriate balance between profitable farming and achievement of biodiversity goals; the extent to which flooding can and should be managed across Otmoor for the benefit of farming and conservation; and the extent to which M40 runoff is responsible for pollution of parts of Otmoor. The disagreements are primarily policy-related and require further investigation and resolution. The key question to be answered is what is the appropriate balance between farming and conservation on Otmoor? If farming practices are a key mechanism for the delivery of conservation objectives then this must be recognised. If policies, such as the Common Agricultural Policy are distorting the market then this needs to be addressed to ensure that the natural systems are valued appropriately. McInnes, et al., 2008 Conceptual framework A priority target for an ecosystems approach is the conservation of ecosystem structure and functioning in order to maintain ecosystem services. Based on the terminology adopted in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, elements of four ecosystem services (drawn from the only three of the main ecosystem service categories and omitting ‘supporting’ services) were investigated at Otmoor: Regulating: Water purification and waste treatment: specifically the removal of phosphorus and nitrogen. Regulating: Natural hazard regulation: specifically reducing the likelihood of extreme flood events. Provisioning: Food: specifically conversion of light, energy and nutrients into agricultural biomass. Cultural: Recreational: specifically provision of recreational opportunity. These services were selected on a priori knowledge of the site and in advance of any stakeholder consultation and do not necessarily represent the most important or economically valuable ecosystems services delivered by Otmoor. In order to quantify, and subsequently determine an economic valuation for, the four ecosystem services it was necessary to understand what was meant by ‘ecosystem services’. A conceptual model was employed in the investigations at Otmoor which reduced services to functions, processes and the variables which control relationships among them. Causal chains were derived in order to understand further and illustrate the relationships which exist among ecosystem services. Assessment of ecosystem services Each of the ecosystem services listed above was quantified and, where possible, an economic value was calculated. The assessment was undertaken across the four different land designations in order to understand better how different levels of protection influence the delivery of ecosystem services. Site and ecosystem service specific methodologies had to be developed for the quantification and economic valuation component of this study. Due to limitations in the approach it was not possible to assign an economic value to natural hazard regulation. Subtle, but not significant differences in the economic value of the ecosystem services were identified for the four different land designations. Food production was the most significant economic benefit ranging between £259 and £355 per hectare per annum. Water purification ranged between £15 and £ 20 per hectare per annum and recreation between £8 and £31 per hectare
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deficiency of the Zinc Finger Protein ZFP106 Causes Motor and Sensory
    Human Molecular Genetics, 2016, Vol. 25, No. 2 291–307 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv471 Advance Access Publication Date: 24 November 2015 Original Article ORIGINAL ARTICLE Deficiency of the zinc finger protein ZFP106 causes Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/25/2/291/2384594 by guest on 23 September 2021 motor and sensory neurodegeneration Peter I. Joyce1, Pietro Fratta2,†, Allison S. Landman1,†, Philip Mcgoldrick2,†, Henning Wackerhage3, Michael Groves2, Bharani Shiva Busam3, Jorge Galino4, Silvia Corrochano1, Olga A. Beskina2, Christopher Esapa1, Edward Ryder4, Sarah Carter1, Michelle Stewart1, Gemma Codner1, Helen Hilton1, Lydia Teboul1, Jennifer Tucker1, Arimantas Lionikas3, Jeanne Estabel5, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis5, Jacqueline K. White5, Sebastian Brandner2, Vincent Plagnol6, David L. H. Bennet4,AndreyY.Abramov2,LindaGreensmith2,*, Elizabeth M. C. Fisher2,* and Abraham Acevedo-Arozena1,* 1MRC Mammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell, Oxfordshire OX11 0RD, UK, 2UCL Institute of Neurology and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, 3Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK, 4Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK, 5Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK and 6UCL Genetics Institute, London WC1E 6BT, UK *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] (A.A.)/e.fi[email protected] (E.M.C.F.)/[email protected] (L.G.) Abstract Zinc finger motifs are distributed amongst many eukaryotic protein families, directing nucleic acid–protein and protein–protein interactions. Zinc finger protein 106 (ZFP106) has previously been associated with roles in immune response, muscle differentiation, testes development and DNA damage, although little is known about its specific function.
    [Show full text]
  • River Cherwell Catchment Management Plan
    NRA Thames 228 RIVER CHERWELL CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT ACTION PLAN National Rivers Authority November 1995 Thames Region - West Area Isis House Howbery Park Wallingford Oxon 0X10 8BD KEY CATCHMENT STATISTICS Catchment area: 906 km2 Average Annual rainfall (1941-70): 682mm Total Main River length: 506km Population (estimate): 137,000 NRA National Rrvers Authority Thames Region General Features Local Authorities CMP Boundary Water Body Urban Areas Stratford-on-Avon West Oxfordshire Main Rivers Lock County Boundary' Daventry South Oxfordshire Non Main Rivers Motorway □ S. Northants. Oxford City Oxford Canal A Road Chcrwell Aylesbury Vale VISION 1-OR TIIE RIVER Cl IER WELL CATCHMENT In preparing the catchment visiou, the NRA has defined what it would wish the catchment to be aud the principle we will be following in working towards that visiou. The catchmeut visiou may not be something that cau be achieved iu the next five years, but something we can all work towards. Whilst the Cherwell Catchment lies largely within Oxfordshire it also encroaches into Buckinghamshire to the east and Warwickshire and Northamptonshire to the north. From its source at Charwelton to the Thames confluence, the river generally flows north to south and over a length of about 96 bn falls 100 metres, draining an area o f over 900 Ian2. Agriculture is the main land use in the catchment and has influenced the character of its countryside and landscape. The contribution made by the River Cherwell to the character of Oxfordshire in particular is recognised by several policies in the Structure Plan which seek to protect and enhance its natural features.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2018
    Dorchester News Free to every home in the parish October 2018 1 Dorchester News October 2018 In this issue DoT view Dorchester Abbey Community and government I see that the Co-op started putting Harvest 3 Ox-Cam Expressway 29 mince pies by the till in the middle of Welcoming children and families 3 Adopt a grave 31 September, a sure sign that Christ- Talking Point 3 Housing survey 31 mas is somewhere on the horizon. Christmas cards 4 Parish Council Notices 31 And with this month’s issue we start Memorial Service 4 Cooking oil news 32 looking ahead to it, with a reminder Thefts 4 From your County Councillor 33 to get your abbey Christmas and an Abbey Museum 8 From your MP 35 appeal from Host to bring an interna- WWI Armistice Commemoration 11 tional student into your home who Light: A Spiritual Journey 12 would otherwise be alone. Ride & Stride 24 But before we get there. We have Community and charity autumn ahead of us. The big event Clubs, Societies and Sports Host for Christmas 19 in the Abbey is the start of Light: A Dorchester Lunch Club 4 Wildlife gardening 19 Spiritual Journey which will continue WI 5 Footsteps 25 into early 2019. A collaboration of Culham Horticultural Soc 7 CAB 32 local people, Adrian Brooks and Tim DoT Historical Society and Sylva 9 Cook, this promises to be special. Dorchester Cricket results 18 Adrian’s artwork theatres were seen Dorchestre Football Results 18 in the Narnia event and more recent- Tennis Club Quiz Night 18 Wallingford Wallingford Corn Exchange 36 ly at the Allotment story event in the DADS 30 Wallingford U3A 37 Guest House, and are always magi- Wallingford Archaeological Society 37 cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Flamingo ABOUT the GROUP
    Flamingo ABOUT THE GROUP Bulletin of the IUCN-SSC/Wetlands International The Flamingo Specialist Group (FSG) was established in 1978 at Tour du Valat in France, under the leadership of Dr. Alan Johnson, who coordinated the group until 2004 (see profile at www.wetlands.org/networks/Profiles/January.htm). Currently, the group is FLAMINGO SPECIALIST GROUP coordinated from the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust at Slimbridge, UK, as part of the IUCN- SSC/Wetlands International Waterbird Network. The FSG is a global network of flamingo specialists (both scientists and non- scientists) concerned with the study, monitoring, management and conservation of the world’s six flamingo species populations. Its role is to actively promote flamingo research and conservation worldwide by encouraging information exchange and cooperation amongst these specialists, and with other relevant organisations, particularly IUCN - SSC, Ramsar, WWF International and BirdLife International. FSG members include experts in both in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) flamingo conservation, as well as in fields ranging from field surveys to breeding biology, diseases, tracking movements and data management. There are currently 165 members around the world, from India to Chile, and from France to South Africa. Further information about the FSG, its membership, the membership list serve, or this bulletin can be obtained from Brooks Childress at the address below. Chair Assistant Chair Dr. Brooks Childress Mr. Nigel Jarrett Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Slimbridge Glos. GL2 7BT, UK Glos. GL2 7BT, UK Tel: +44 (0)1453 860437 Tel: +44 (0)1453 891177 Fax: +44 (0)1453 860437 Fax: +44 (0)1453 890827 [email protected] [email protected] Eastern Hemisphere Chair Western Hemisphere Chair Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Tenth Mammalian Genetics And
    Genet. Res., Camb. (2000), 76, pp. 199–214. Printed in the United Kingdom # 2000 Cambridge University Press 199 Abstracts of papers presented at the tenth Mammalian Genetics and Deelopment Workshop (Incorporating the Promega Young Geneticists’ Meeting) held at the Institute of Child Health, Uniersity College London on 17–19Noember 1999 " # Edited by: ANDREW J. COPP AND ELIZABETH M. C. FISHER 1Institute of Child Health, Uniersity College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK # Neurogenetics Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK Sponsored by: The Genetical Society, Promega (UK) Ltd and B&K Universal Group Ltd Evidence for imprinting in type 2 diabetes: detection of Identification of a locus for primary ciliary dyskinesia parent-of-origin effects at the insulin gene on chromosome 19 " " " STEWART HUXTABLE, PHILIP SAKER, LEMA S. L. SPIDEN , M. MEEKS , A. J. WALNE ,H. # # HADDAD, ANDREW HATTERSLEY, MARK BLAU , H. MUSSAFFI-GEORGY ,H. $ % % WALKER and MARK McCARTHY SIMPSON , M. EL FEHAID , M. CHEEBAB ,M. % % Section of Endocrinology, Imperial College School of AL-DABBAGH , H. D. HAMMUM ,R.M. " " Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK GARDINER , E. M. K. CHUNG and H. M. " MITCHISON " Variation at the insulin gene (INS) VNTR is impli- Department of Paediatrics, Royal Free and Uniersity cated in type 1 diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome College Medical School, Uniersity College London, # and birthweight. Case-control studies inconsistently UK; Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, $ show class III VNTR association with type 2 diabetes, Petech Tika, Israel; School of Medical Sciences, but may result from population stratification.
    [Show full text]
  • References.Qxd 12/14/2004 10:35 AM Page 771
    Ducks_References.qxd 12/14/2004 10:35 AM Page 771 References Aarvak, T. and Øien, I.J. 1994. Dverggås Anser Adams, J.S. 1971. Black Swan at Lake Ellesmere. erythropus—en truet art i Norge. Vår Fuglefauna 17: 70–80. Wildl. Rev. 3: 23–25. Aarvak, T. and Øien, I.J. 2003. Moult and autumn Adams, P.A., Robertson, G.J. and Jones, I.L. 2000. migration of non-breeding Fennoscandian Lesser White- Time-activity budgets of Harlequin Ducks molting in fronted Geese Anser erythropus mapped by satellite the Gannet Islands, Labrador. Condor 102: 703–08. telemetry. Bird Conservation International 13: 213–226. Adrian, W.L., Spraker, T.R. and Davies, R.B. 1978. Aarvak, T., Øien, I.J. and Nagy, S. 1996. The Lesser Epornitics of aspergillosis in Mallards Anas platyrhynchos White-fronted Goose monitoring programme,Ann. Rept. in north central Colorado. J. Wildl. Dis. 14: 212–17. 1996, NOF Rappportserie, No. 7. Norwegian Ornitho- AEWA 2000. Report on the conservation status of logical Society, Klaebu. migratory waterbirds in the agreement area. Technical Series Aarvak, T., Øien, I.J., Syroechkovski Jr., E.E. and No. 1.Wetlands International,Wageningen, Netherlands. Kostadinova, I. 1997. The Lesser White-fronted Goose Afton, A.D. 1983. Male and female strategies for Monitoring Programme.Annual Report 1997. Klæbu, reproduction in Lesser Scaup. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis. Norwegian Ornithological Society. NOF Raportserie, Univ. North Dakota, Grand Forks, US. Report no. 5-1997. Afton, A.D. 1984. Influence of age and time on Abbott, C.C. 1861. Notes on the birds of the Falkland reproductive performance of female Lesser Scaup.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval Oxfordshire
    Anglo-Saxon Oxfordshire Sally Crawford and Anne Dodd, December 2007 1. Introduction: nature of the evidence, history of research and the role of material culture Anglo-Saxon Oxfordshire has been extremely well served by archaeological research, not least because of coincidence of Oxfordshire’s diverse underlying geology and the presence of the University of Oxford. Successive generations of geologists at Oxford studied and analysed the landscape of Oxfordshire, and in so doing, laid the foundations for the new discipline of archaeology. As early as 1677, geologist Robert Plot had published his The Natural History of Oxfordshire ; William Smith (1769- 1839), who was born in Churchill, Oxfordshire, determined the law of superposition of strata, and in so doing formulated the principles of stratigraphy used by archaeologists and geologists alike; and William Buckland (1784-1856) conducted experimental archaeology on mammoth bones, and recognised the first human prehistoric skeleton. Antiquarian interest in Oxfordshire lead to a number of significant discoveries: John Akerman and Stephen Stone's researches in the gravels at Standlake recorded Anglo-Saxon graves, and Stone also recognised and plotted cropmarks in his local area from the back of his horse (Akerman and Stone 1858; Stone 1859; Brown 1973). Although Oxford did not have an undergraduate degree in Archaeology until the 1990s, the Oxford University Archaeological Society, originally the Oxford University Brass Rubbing Society, was founded in the 1890s, and was responsible for a large number of small but significant excavations in and around Oxfordshire as well as providing a training ground for many British archaeologists. Pioneering work in aerial photography was carried out on the Oxfordshire gravels by Major Allen in the 1930s, and Edwin Thurlow Leeds, based at the Ashmolean Museum, carried out excavations at Sutton Courtenay, identifying Anglo-Saxon settlement in the 1920s, and at Abingdon, identifying a major early Anglo-Saxon cemetery (Leeds 1923, 1927, 1947; Leeds 1936).
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorus Cycling in the Settlement Lagoon of a Treatment Wetland
    1 Phosphorus cycling in the settlement lagoon of a treatment wetland Santiago Jose Clerici Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Earth and Environment August 2013 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Santiago Jose Clerici to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2013 The University of Leeds and Santiago Jose Clerici 3 Acknowledgements I thank my supervisors Mike Krom, Rob Mortimer and Sally Mackenzie for their constant support. My thanks also go to Sam Allshorn, David Ashley, Rachel Spraggs, Cat Mcilwraith and Teresa Roncal Herrero for their assistance and advice during field and laboratory work. 4 Abstract The South Finger treatment wetland at Slimbridge, UK, was designed to treat water that has been impacted by the faeces of a dense population of waterfowl. The wetland system has been failing consistently in retaining phosphorus (P). It has been suggested that the settlement lagoon of the wetland is the cause for its failure regarding P, because the lagoon exports P in the summer months. The aim of this project was to understand the importance of the settlement lagoon in the overall budget of P, and to understand the mechanisms that result in such behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Increasing Goose Populations
    wli.wwt.org.uk www.eaaflyway.net Joint Newsletter Issue no. 1, September 2013 Wetland Site CEPA News in the EAA Flyway Dear East Asia Flyway Colleague, EAAFP and the WLI initiative. The newsletter focuses on wetland CEPA activities across the flyway, aiming to share experience of practical wetland CEPA activities In this issue... between partners of both WLI and EAAFP. Wetland centres form an important interface between national and international agreements on conservation, and the Introduction local action and implementation by stakeholders, and play a crucial role in raising awareness of wetlands Invitation to join WLI/EAAFP case with local communities and decision-makers. studies As you will read in this issue, the range of activities is Miranda Wetland Centre - Bioblitz huge, from competitions to get local people excited and involved in surveying wild birds, working with farmers Hong Kong 1 – Bird Race, HKWP to encourage bird-friendly farming, to developing new high-profile wetland centres as part of an international expo. Hong Kong 2 – Community Work at Mai Po We hope that you find these stories as interesting and inspiring as we do, and please do send us stories for Korea – Suncheon International our next issue which is due out in April next year. Wetland Centre Please do send us your articles, around 400 words long and with some pictures of your site, wildlife and activities, see our contact details on the back page. Sungei Buloh – awaiting Best regards, Japan – Kabukiri Numa Chris Rostron Spike Millington Head of WLI EAAFP secretariat We are launching this joint newsletter, to be sent out twice a year, marking the cooperation between the Call for case studies We’re keen to set up a space on the WLI and EAAFP have very little knowledge of what they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Meeting of Council
    Public Document Pack Special Meeting of Council Tuesday 27 January 2015 Members of Cherwell District Council, A special meeting of Council will be held at Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA on Tuesday 27 January 2015 at 6.30 pm, and you are hereby summoned to attend. Sue Smith Chief Executive Monday 19 January 2015 AGENDA 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting. 3 Communications To receive communications from the Chairman and/or the Leader of the Council. Cherwell District Council, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX15 4AA www.cherwell.gov.uk Council Business Reports 4 Cherwell Boundary Review: Response to Local Government Boundary Commission for England Draft Recommendations (Pages 1 - 44) Report of Chief Executive Purpose of report To agree Cherwell District Council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s (“LGBCE” or “the Commission”) draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council. Recommendations The meeting is recommended: 1.1 To agree the Cherwell District Council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council (Appendix 1). 1.2 To delegate authority to the Chief Executive to make any necessary amendments to the council’s response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft recommendations of the further electoral review for Cherwell District Council prior to submission in light of the resolutions of Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Coaching Days on the Oxford Road
    Coaching days on the Oxford Road Before the A40 was constructed, travellers from London to Oxford and Worcester came through Wheatley and details of royalty and others who did so have already been described. It is important to understand the differing routes which have run through Wheatley from 1593, with these being shown on Jack Turner’s excellent interpretation of the 1593 All Souls College map onto which he has added more recent features and names. Coming from London in 1593, the traveller crossed over Wheatley bridge (at the bottom of the map). Shortly afterwards, and whilst still in the parish of Holton, there was a choice of either turning left or continuing straight on. A ‘dry route’ avoided the brook along the valley through the village, by taking the left turn to Shotover and turning left again at the Cley Hill field. It is described on the 1593 map as the ‘waye leading from Wheatley bridge to Shotover’ and leads on into Oxford. The route which went straight on followed the line of the London Road (including the ‘bulge’, now Old London Road), turning left into what is now Church Road (merely a track at the time), and thence into, and across, Westfield towards Forest Hill, and on to Islip and Worcester. By the time that coaches were travelling from London to Oxford, they would have taken the left turn after the bridge which linked up with Roman Road, ignoring the Cley Hill turn, before becoming Crown Road, and thence Wheatley High Street, thus enabling the coaches to avoid the steep climb up Castle Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • 70751 064 RAF Brize Norton ACP Consultation Report Draft A-BZN
    ERROR! NO TEXT OF SPECIFIED STYLE IN DOCUMENT. RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback Report Document Details Reference Description Document Title RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback Report Document Ref 70751 064 Issue Issue 1 Date 3rd October 2018 Issue Amendment Date Issue 1 3rd October 2018 RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal | Document Details ii 70751 064 | Issue 1 Executive Summary RAF Brize Norton (BZN) would like to extend thanks to all the organisations and individuals that took the time to participate and provide feedback to the Public Consultation held between 15th December 2017 and 5th April 2018. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) is the Sponsor of a proposed change to the current arrangements and procedures in the immediate airspace surrounding the airport. As the airport operators, and operators of the current Class D Controlled Airspace (CAS), RAF Brize Norton is managing this process on behalf of the MOD. If approved, the proposed change will provide enhanced protection to aircraft on the critical stages of flight in departure and final approach, and will provide connectivity between the RAF Brize Norton Control Zone (CTR) and the UK Airways network. In addition, the Airspace Change will deliver new Instrument Flight Procedures (IFP) utilising Satellite Based Navigation which will futureproof the procedures used at the Station. As part of the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) Guidance on the Application of the Airspace Change Process (Civil Aviation Publication (CAP) 725) [Reference 1], BZN is required to submit a case to the CAA to justify its proposed Airspace Change, and to undertake consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]