Looking Forward to Test the KOTO Anomaly with FASER

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Looking forward to test the KOTO anomaly with FASER Felix Kling∗ SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Sebastian Trojanowskiy Consortium for Fundamental Physics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield, S3 7RH, UK and National Centre for Nuclear Research, Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland The search for light and long-lived particles at the LHC will be intensified in the upcoming years with a prominent role of the new FASER experiment. In this study, we discuss how FASER could independently probe such scenarios relevant for new physics searches at kaon factories. We put an emphasis on the proposed explanations for the recently observed three anomalous events in the KOTO experiment. The baseline of FASER precisely corresponds to the proposed lifetime solution to the anomaly that avoids the NA62 bounds on charged kaons. As a result, the experiment can start constraining relevant models within the first few weeks of its operation. In some cases, it can confirm a possible discovery with up to 104 spectacular high-energy events in FASER during LHC Run 3. Further complementarities between FASER and kaon factories, which employ FASER capability to study γγ signatures, are illustrated for the model with axion-like particles dominantly coupled to SU(2)W gauge bosons. I. INTRODUCTION or FASER [3{5]. The FASER experiment will search for LLPs abundantly produced in the far-forward direction The quest for beyond the Standard Model (BSM) of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) during its upcom- physics is undoubtedly among the biggest challenges in ing Run 3. Several features of its setup make it an ideal contemporary physics. It has typically been driven by probe for light LLPs produced in kaon decays: i) Given the lack of answers to some fundamental questions, such a large expected boost factor of light particles traveling as understanding the unification of the forces of nature towards FASER, and the location of the detector, the or the mechanism of baryogenesis, as well as by hints of experiment's sensitivity is optimal for the precise combi- new physics appearing in anomalous experimental obser- nation of the lifetime and mass that are required to fit vations. The latter become especially intriguing when the anomaly. In particular, for high-energy LLPs with the known Standard Model (SM) background (BG) can E ∼ 1 TeV that are produced at the ATLAS IP, the be reduced to negligible levels so that even the observa- sensitivity reach of FASER is maximized for tion of a few events can be attributed to BSM effects. The flavor-changing rare decays of kaons are excep- τLLP 0:1 ns ∼ ; (best FASER reach): (1) tionally promising examples of such discovery channels mLLP 100 MeV given their highly suppressed SM rates. In particular, the KOTO collaboration has recently reported a possible ii) The FASER sensitivity additionally benefits from the observation of three anomalous events in the search for O(150 m) long part of the LHC beam pipe, in which 0 KL ! π νν¯ [1], in which no SM signal was expected at forward-going neutral kaons can travel and decay before the current level of the experimental sensitivity. If taken being absorbed, as well as the presence of additional LLP as a signal, this observation would indicate that the rel- production modes at the LHC. iii) The FASER detector evant branching fraction exceeds the SM prediction by has the capability to not only detect LLP decays into about two orders of magnitude [2]. It has been quickly arXiv:2006.10630v2 [hep-ph] 2 Dec 2020 charged particles but also into photon pairs, due to its noticed that the discrepancy could be resolved by intro- dedicated pre-shower detector. As a result, during Run ducing a new light long-lived particle (LLP) with mass 3 of the LHC, FASER can turn the three currently ob- of order 100 MeV, light enough to be produced in kaon served anomalous events at KOTO into up to O(104) decays. By properly adjusting the lifetime of the LLP, spectacular high-energy LLP decay events with expected one can explain the neutral kaon anomaly while avoid- negligible BG. ing stringent bounds on such models from searches for The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec.II charged kaon decays. and Sec. III we provide more details about the KOTO In this study, we illustrate how such proposed solu- anomaly and the FASER experiment, respectively. The tions to the KOTO anomaly could be thoroughly probed FASER sensitivity reach in several selected BSM scenar- by the recently approved ForwArd Search ExpeRiment, ios is presented in Sec.IV. In Sec.V, we further illustrate the possible interplay between FASER and searches for LLPs in kaon factories. We conclude in Sec.VI. Sev- ∗ [email protected] eral useful expressions for BSM meson decay branching y s.trojanowski@sheffield.ac.uk fractions are listed in AppendixA. 2 II. KOTO EXPERIMENT AND THE with the corresponding branching fraction measured to ANOMALY be at the 68% CL [13], B (K+ ! π+νν¯) = 0:47+0:72 × 10−10; (6) The KOTO experiment [6] has been designed to study NA62 −0:47 decays of kaons into neutral pions and a neutrino/anti- and the upper bound at the 95% CL given by neutrino pair, K ! π0νν¯. The kaons are produced + + −10 L BNA62,bound(K ! π νν¯) < 2:44 × 10 . The mea- in collisions of 30 GeV protons from the Japan Proton surements of the charged kaon decay branching fraction, Accelerator Research Complex [7] (J-PARC) main ring together with the GN bound Eq. (5), lead to (2 − 3)σ accelerator with the target made out of gold. A high- tension with the anomalous observation by the KOTO intensity beam of neutral kaons produced at an angle of collaboration, cf. Eq. (4), depending on how the possible ◦ 16 with respect to the proton beam line is created with impact of new physics is taken into account [2]. A num- the use of dedicated collimators. At a distance of about ber of BSM scenarios have been proposed to explain this 24 m away from the target, the ∼3 m long vacuum cham- discrepancy [2, 14{31]. ber of the KOTO detector begins. Here, kaon decays are Among these scenarios, a prominent role is played by identified by detecting photons produced in prompt neu- models predicting the existence of a new LLP with the tral pion decays. mass mX ∼ 100 MeV, which can be produced in rare The data collected by the KOTO collaboration in 2015 0 kaon decays, KL ! π X [2]. In particular, if such a light allowed them to obtain the leading bound on the branch- BSM particle has a lifetime of order τX ∼ 0:1 ns, it can ing fraction of the aforementioned decay process. At the be effectively stable and invisible in the search performed 90% confidence level (CL) it reads [8] by the KOTO collaboration. At the same time, X will 0 −9 typically decay inside the E949 and NA62 detectors, and BKOTO,bound(KL ! π νν¯) ≤ 3 × 10 : (2) it does not contribute to the measured branching fraction + + of KL ! π νν¯. This leads to an apparent violation of Notably, Eq. (2) is consistent with the SM prediction the GN bound when the results of these experiments are which remains about two orders of magnitude lower, 0 −11 compared with each other, which is further referred to as BSM(KL ! π νν¯) = (3:4 ± 0:6) × 10 [9]. A simi- 0 0 the lifetime solution to the anomaly. lar bound on the two-body decay K ! π X has also A very long-lived X can also explain the anomaly while been obtained, where X is a stable or long-lived BSM avoiding the bounds from past beam-dump searches. In bosonic particle, addition, if its mass is close to the pion mass, it can es- cape detection in E949 and NA62 experiments by hiding B (K ! π0 X) 2:4 × 10−9: (3) KOTO,bound L . in the SM BG [32]. Another distinct possibility is to allow In the subsequent analysis of the data from 2016-18 [1], KL decays into neutral dark states, KL ! X1 X2. Sub- however, a total of four candidate events were found, only sequent Xi decays that produce photons can be detected one of which had the properties of BG. If taken as a in the KOTO electromagnetic calorimeter and resemble signal, the remaining three anomalous events point to a neutral pion signature [26]. In this case, charged kaon the branching fraction which significantly exceeds the SM three-body decays can be suppressed or even kinemati- prediction. At the 95% CL it is given by [2] cally forbidden. Below, we analyze the prospect of probing such se- 0 +4:1 −9 lected BSM scenarios in the FASER experiment at the BKOTO,anom.(KL ! π νν¯) = (2:1 ) × 10 : (4) −1:7 LHC. Importantly, in the SM the aforementioned neutral kaon decay mode is also related by the isospin symme- try to the value of the branching fraction of a charged III. FASER AND FASER 2 EXPERIMENTS kaon decay into a pion π+ and a neutrino/anti-neutrino pair, which proceeds via the same parton level process The FASER experiment [3{5] has been proposed to s ! dνν¯. The relevant so-called Grossman-Nir (GN) search for LLPs [33, 34] produced in the forward region bound [10] reads of the LHC [35{41], as well as to study interactions of high-energy neutrinos [42{44]. It utilizes the fact that 0 + + B(KL ! π νν¯) < 4:3 B(K ! π νν¯): (5) light and high-energy particles produced in pp collisions at the LHC and e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Higgs Bosons and Supersymmetry

    Higgs Bosons and Supersymmetry

    Higgs bosons and Supersymmetry 1. The Higgs mechanism in the Standard Model | The story so far | The SM Higgs boson at the LHC | Problems with the SM Higgs boson 2. Supersymmetry | Surpassing Poincar´e | Supersymmetry motivations | The MSSM 3. Conclusions & Summary D.J. Miller, Edinburgh, July 2, 2004 page 1 of 25 1. Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in the Standard Model 1. Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in the Standard Model Observation: Weak nuclear force mediated by W and Z bosons • M = 80:423 0:039GeV M = 91:1876 0:0021GeV W Z W couples only to left{handed fermions • Fermions have non-zero masses • Theory: We would like to describe electroweak physics by an SU(2) U(1) gauge theory. L ⊗ Y Left{handed fermions are SU(2) doublets Chiral theory ) right{handed fermions are SU(2) singlets f There are two problems with this, both concerning mass: gauge symmetry massless gauge bosons • SU(2) forbids m)( ¯ + ¯ ) terms massless fermions • L L R R L ) D.J. Miller, Edinburgh, July 2, 2004 page 2 of 25 1. Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in the Standard Model Higgs Mechanism Introduce new SU(2) doublet scalar field (φ) with potential V (φ) = λ φ 4 µ2 φ 2 j j − j j Minimum of the potential is not at zero 1 0 µ2 φ = with v = h i p2 v r λ Electroweak symmetry is broken Interactions with scalar field provide: Gauge boson masses • 1 1 2 2 MW = gv MZ = g + g0 v 2 2q Fermion masses • Y ¯ φ m = Y v=p2 f R L −! f f 4 degrees of freedom., 3 become longitudinal components of W and Z, one left over the Higgs boson D.J.
  • Pion and Kaon Structure at 12 Gev Jlab and EIC

    Pion and Kaon Structure at 12 Gev Jlab and EIC

    Pion and Kaon Structure at 12 GeV JLab and EIC Tanja Horn Collaboration with Ian Cloet, Rolf Ent, Roy Holt, Thia Keppel, Kijun Park, Paul Reimer, Craig Roberts, Richard Trotta, Andres Vargas Thanks to: Yulia Furletova, Elke Aschenauer and Steve Wood INT 17-3: Spatial and Momentum Tomography 28 August - 29 September 2017, of Hadrons and Nuclei INT - University of Washington Emergence of Mass in the Standard Model LHC has NOT found the “God Particle” Slide adapted from Craig Roberts (EICUGM 2017) because the Higgs boson is NOT the origin of mass – Higgs-boson only produces a little bit of mass – Higgs-generated mass-scales explain neither the proton’s mass nor the pion’s (near-)masslessness Proton is massive, i.e. the mass-scale for strong interactions is vastly different to that of electromagnetism Pion is unnaturally light (but not massless), despite being a strongly interacting composite object built from a valence-quark and valence antiquark Kaon is also light (but not massless), heavier than the pion constituted of a light valence quark and a heavier strange antiquark The strong interaction sector of the Standard Model, i.e. QCD, is the key to understanding the origin, existence and properties of (almost) all known matter Origin of Mass of QCD’s Pseudoscalar Goldstone Modes Exact statements from QCD in terms of current quark masses due to PCAC: [Phys. Rep. 87 (1982) 77; Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 3369; Phys. Lett. B420 (1998) 267] 2 Pseudoscalar masses are generated dynamically – If rp ≠ 0, mp ~ √mq The mass of bound states increases as √m with the mass of the constituents In contrast, in quantum mechanical models, e.g., constituent quark models, the mass of bound states rises linearly with the mass of the constituents E.g., in models with constituent quarks Q: in the nucleon mQ ~ ⅓mN ~ 310 MeV, in the pion mQ ~ ½mp ~ 70 MeV, in the kaon (with s quark) mQ ~ 200 MeV – This is not real.
  • Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM Phenomenology

    Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM Phenomenology

    Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM phenomenology Ulrich Nierste Institut f¨ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik Universit¨at Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany I give an introduction to the theory of meson-antimeson mixing, aiming at students who plan to work at a flavour physics experiment or intend to do associated theoretical studies. I derive the formulae for the time evolution of a neutral meson system and show how the mass and width differences among the neutral meson eigenstates and the CP phase in mixing are calculated in the Standard Model. Special emphasis is laid on CP violation, which is covered in detail for K−K mixing, Bd−Bd mixing and Bs−Bs mixing. I explain the constraints on the apex (ρ, η) of the unitarity triangle implied by ǫK ,∆MBd ,∆MBd /∆MBs and various mixing-induced CP asymmetries such as aCP(Bd → J/ψKshort)(t). The impact of a future measurement of CP violation in flavour-specific Bd decays is also shown. 1 First lecture: A big-brush picture 1.1 Mesons, quarks and box diagrams The neutral K, D, Bd and Bs mesons are the only hadrons which mix with their antiparticles. These meson states are flavour eigenstates and the corresponding antimesons K, D, Bd and Bs have opposite flavour quantum numbers: K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, (1) ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ Here for example “Bs bs” means that the Bs meson has the same flavour quantum numbers as the quark pair (b,s), i.e.∼ the beauty and strangeness quantum numbers are B = 1 and S = 1, respectively.
  • Detection of a Strange Particle

    Detection of a Strange Particle

    10 extraordinary papers Within days, Watson and Crick had built a identify the full set of codons was completed in forensics, and research into more-futuristic new model of DNA from metal parts. Wilkins by 1966, with Har Gobind Khorana contributing applications, such as DNA-based computing, immediately accepted that it was correct. It the sequences of bases in several codons from is well advanced. was agreed between the two groups that they his experiments with synthetic polynucleotides Paradoxically, Watson and Crick’s iconic would publish three papers simultaneously in (see go.nature.com/2hebk3k). structure has also made it possible to recog- Nature, with the King’s researchers comment- With Fred Sanger and colleagues’ publica- nize the shortcomings of the central dogma, ing on the fit of Watson and Crick’s structure tion16 of an efficient method for sequencing with the discovery of small RNAs that can reg- to the experimental data, and Franklin and DNA in 1977, the way was open for the com- ulate gene expression, and of environmental Gosling publishing Photograph 51 for the plete reading of the genetic information in factors that induce heritable epigenetic first time7,8. any species. The task was completed for the change. No doubt, the concept of the double The Cambridge pair acknowledged in their human genome by 2003, another milestone helix will continue to underpin discoveries in paper that they knew of “the general nature in the history of DNA. biology for decades to come. of the unpublished experimental results and Watson devoted most of the rest of his ideas” of the King’s workers, but it wasn’t until career to education and scientific administra- Georgina Ferry is a science writer based in The Double Helix, Watson’s explosive account tion as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Labo- Oxford, UK.
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry

    Introduction to Supersymmetry

    Introduction to Supersymmetry Pre-SUSY Summer School Corpus Christi, Texas May 15-18, 2019 Stephen P. Martin Northern Illinois University [email protected] 1 Topics: Why: Motivation for supersymmetry (SUSY) • What: SUSY Lagrangians, SUSY breaking and the Minimal • Supersymmetric Standard Model, superpartner decays Who: Sorry, not covered. • For some more details and a slightly better attempt at proper referencing: A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356, version 7, January 2016 • TASI 2011 lectures notes: two-component fermion notation and • supersymmetry, arXiv:1205.4076. If you find corrections, please do let me know! 2 Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduction to Supersymmetry Motivation: The Hierarchy Problem • Supermultiplets • Particle content of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model • (MSSM) Need for “soft” breaking of supersymmetry • The Wess-Zumino Model • 3 People have cited many reasons why extensions of the Standard Model might involve supersymmetry (SUSY). Some of them are: A possible cold dark matter particle • A light Higgs boson, M = 125 GeV • h Unification of gauge couplings • Mathematical elegance, beauty • ⋆ “What does that even mean? No such thing!” – Some modern pundits ⋆ “We beg to differ.” – Einstein, Dirac, . However, for me, the single compelling reason is: The Hierarchy Problem • 4 An analogy: Coulomb self-energy correction to the electron’s mass A point-like electron would have an infinite classical electrostatic energy. Instead, suppose the electron is a solid sphere of uniform charge density and radius R. An undergraduate problem gives: 3e2 ∆ECoulomb = 20πǫ0R 2 Interpreting this as a correction ∆me = ∆ECoulomb/c to the electron mass: 15 0.86 10− meters m = m + (1 MeV/c2) × .
  • Prospects for Measurements with Strange Hadrons at Lhcb

    Prospects for Measurements with Strange Hadrons at Lhcb

    Prospects for measurements with strange hadrons at LHCb A. A. Alves Junior1, M. O. Bettler2, A. Brea Rodr´ıguez1, A. Casais Vidal1, V. Chobanova1, X. Cid Vidal1, A. Contu3, G. D'Ambrosio4, J. Dalseno1, F. Dettori5, V.V. Gligorov6, G. Graziani7, D. Guadagnoli8, T. Kitahara9;10, C. Lazzeroni11, M. Lucio Mart´ınez1, M. Moulson12, C. Mar´ınBenito13, J. Mart´ınCamalich14;15, D. Mart´ınezSantos1, J. Prisciandaro 1, A. Puig Navarro16, M. Ramos Pernas1, V. Renaudin13, A. Sergi11, K. A. Zarebski11 1Instituto Galego de F´ısica de Altas Enerx´ıas(IGFAE), Santiago de Compostela, Spain 2Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 3INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 4INFN Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy 5Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, now at Universit`adegli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 6LPNHE, Sorbonne Universit´e,Universit´eParis Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France 7INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy 8Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Th´eorique , Annecy Cedex, France 9Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics (TTP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kalsruhe, Germany 10Institute for Nuclear Physics (IKP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kalsruhe, Germany 11School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom 12INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy 13Laboratoire de l'Accelerateur Lineaire (LAL), Orsay, France 14Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias and Universidad de La Laguna, Departamento de Astrof´ısica, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 15CERN, CH-1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland 16Physik-Institut, Universit¨atZ¨urich,Z¨urich,Switzerland arXiv:1808.03477v2 [hep-ex] 31 Jul 2019 Abstract This report details the capabilities of LHCb and its upgrades towards the study of kaons and hyperons.
  • Workshop on Pion-Kaon Interactions (PKI2018) Mini-Proceedings

    Workshop on Pion-Kaon Interactions (PKI2018) Mini-Proceedings

    Date: April 19, 2018 Workshop on Pion-Kaon Interactions (PKI2018) Mini-Proceedings 14th - 15th February, 2018 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA, U.S.A. M. Amaryan, M. Baalouch, G. Colangelo, J. R. de Elvira, D. Epifanov, A. Filippi, B. Grube, V. Ivanov, B. Kubis, P. M. Lo, M. Mai, V. Mathieu, S. Maurizio, C. Morningstar, B. Moussallam, F. Niecknig, B. Pal, A. Palano, J. R. Pelaez, A. Pilloni, A. Rodas, A. Rusetsky, A. Szczepaniak, and J. Stevens Editors: M. Amaryan, Ulf-G. Meißner, C. Meyer, J. Ritman, and I. Strakovsky Abstract This volume is a short summary of talks given at the PKI2018 Workshop organized to discuss current status and future prospects of π K interactions. The precise data on π interaction will − K have a strong impact on strange meson spectroscopy and form factors that are important ingredients in the Dalitz plot analysis of a decays of heavy mesons as well as precision measurement of Vus matrix element and therefore on a test of unitarity in the first raw of the CKM matrix. The workshop arXiv:1804.06528v1 [hep-ph] 18 Apr 2018 has combined the efforts of experimentalists, Lattice QCD, and phenomenology communities. Experimental data relevant to the topic of the workshop were presented from the broad range of different collaborations like CLAS, GlueX, COMPASS, BaBar, BELLE, BESIII, VEPP-2000, and LHCb. One of the main goals of this workshop was to outline a need for a new high intensity and high precision secondary KL beam facility at JLab produced with the 12 GeV electron beam of CEBAF accelerator.
  • Kaon to Two Pions Decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I = 1/2 Rule and CP

    Kaon to Two Pions Decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I = 1/2 Rule and CP

    Kaon to Two Pions decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I =1/2 rule and CP violation Qi Liu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 c 2012 Qi Liu All Rights Reserved Abstract Kaon to Two Pions decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I =1/2 rule and CP violation Qi Liu We report a direct lattice calculation of the K to ππ decay matrix elements for both the ∆I = 1/2 and 3/2 amplitudes A0 and A2 on a 2+1 flavor, domain wall fermion, 163 32 16 lattice ensemble and a 243 64 16 lattice ensemble. This × × × × is a complete calculation in which all contractions for the required ten, four-quark operators are evaluated, including the disconnected graphs in which no quark line connects the initial kaon and final two-pion states. These lattice operators are non- perturbatively renormalized using the Rome-Southampton method and the quadratic divergences are studied and removed. This is an important but notoriously difficult calculation, requiring high statistics on a large volume. In this work we take a major step towards the computation of the physical K ππ amplitudes by performing → a complete calculation at unphysical kinematics with pions of mass 422MeV and 329MeV at rest in the kaon rest frame. With this simplification we are able to 3 resolve Re(A0) from zero for the first time, with a 25% statistical error on the 16 3 lattice and 15% on the 24 lattice. The complex amplitude A2 is calculated with small statistical errors.
  • Physics 29000 – Quarknet/Service Learning

    Physics 29000 – Quarknet/Service Learning

    Physics 29000 – Quarknet/Service Learning Lecture 3: Ionizing Radiation Purdue University Department of Physics February 1, 2013 1 Resources • Particle Data Group: http://pdg.lbl.gov • Summary tables of particle properties: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/tables/contents_tables.html • Table of atomic and nuclear properties of materials: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/reviews/rpp2012-rev-atomic-nuclear-prop.pdf 2 Some Subatomic Particles – electron , and positron , – proton , and neutron , – muon , and anti-muon , • When we don’t care which we usually just call them “muons” or write ± – photon , – electron neutrino , and muon neutrino , – charged pions , ± and charged kaons , ± – neutral pions , and neutral kaons , – “lambda hyperon ”, Some are fundamental (no substructure) while others are not. 3 Subatomic Particles • Fundamental particles (as far as we know): Quarks Leptons • electrons, muons and neutrinos are fundamental. • protons, neutrons, kaons, pions are made of quarks: – baryons have 3 quarks: – mesons are pairs: • what about the photon? 4 Subatomic Particles • fundamental particles of matter interact with fundamental “force carriers” called “gauge bosons”: – Electromagnetic force: photon ( ) – Weak nuclear force, responsible for -decay: , – Strong nuclear force: gluons ( ) • The force carriers “couple” to the “charge” of the matter particle: – photons couple to electric charge (not neutrinos) – W’s couple to “weak hypercharge” (all particles) – gluons couple to “color charge” (only quarks) – mesons and baryons are “colorless”
  • Kaon Oscillations and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe Abstract

    Kaon Oscillations and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe Abstract

    Kaon oscillations and baryon asymmetry of the universe Wanpeng Tan∗ Department of Physics, Institute for Structure and Nuclear Astrophysics (ISNAP), and Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of Elements (JINA-CEE), University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA (Dated: September 17, 2019) Abstract Baryon asymmetry of the universe (BAU) can likely be explained with K0 − K00 oscillations of a newly developed mirror-matter model and new understanding of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) phase transitions. A consistent picture for the origin of both BAU and dark matter is presented with the aid of n − n0 oscillations of the new model. The global symmetry breaking transitions in QCD are proposed to be staged depending on condensation temperatures of strange, charm, bottom, and top quarks in the early universe. The long-standing BAU puzzle could then be understood with K0 − K00 oscillations that occur at the stage of strange quark condensation and baryon number violation via a non-perturbative sphaleron-like (coined \quarkiton") process. Similar processes at charm, bottom, and top quark condensation stages are also discussed including an interesting idea for top quark condensation to break both the QCD global Ut(1)A symmetry and the electroweak gauge symmetry at the same time. Meanwhile, the U(1)A or strong CP problem of particle physics is addressed with a possible explanation under the same framework. ∗ [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The matter-antimatter imbalance or baryon asymmetry of the universe (BAU) has been a long standing puzzle in the study of cosmology. Such an asymmetry can be quantified in various ways.
  • Rare Kaon Decays

    Rare Kaon Decays

    1 64. Rare Kaon Decays 64. Rare Kaon Decays Revised August 2019 by L. Littenberg (BNL) and G. Valencia (Monash U.). 64.1 Introduction There are several useful reviews on rare kaon decays and related topics [1–12]. Activity in rare kaon decays can be divided roughly into four categories: 1. Searches for explicit violations of the Standard Model (SM) 2. The golden modes: K → πνν¯ 3. Other constraints on SM parameters 4. Studies of strong interactions at low energy. The paradigm of Category 1 is the lepton flavor violating decay KL → µe. Category 2 in- cludes the two modes that can be calculated with negligible theoretical uncertainty, K+ → π+νν 0 and KL → π νν. These modes can lead to precision determinations of CKM parameters or, in combination with other measurements of these parameters, they can constrain new interactions. They constitute the main focus of the current experimental kaon program. Category 3 is focused 0 + − + − on decays with charged leptons, such as KL → π ` ` or KL → ` ` where ` ≡ e, µ. These modes are sensitive to CKM parameters but they suffer from multiple hadronic uncertainties that can be addressed, at least in part, through a systematic study of the peripheral modes indicated in Fig. 64.1. The interplay between Categories 3-4 and their complementarity to Category 2 is illustrated in the figure. Category 4 includes reactions like K+ → π+`+`− where long distance con- tributions are dominant and which constitute a testing ground for the ideas of chiral perturbation 0 + − theory. Other decays in this category are KL → π γγ and KL → ` ` γ.
  • Kaon Physics: CP Violation and Hadronic Matrix Elements

    Kaon Physics: CP Violation and Hadronic Matrix Elements

    Kaon Physics: CP Violation and Hadronic Matrix Elements Mar´ıa Elvira G´amiz S´anchez Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica y del Cosmos arXiv:hep-ph/0401236v1 29 Jan 2004 Universidad de Granada October 2003 · · Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 OverviewoftheStandardModel. .. 7 1.1.1 TheScalarSector............................ 9 1.1.2 CP Symmetry Violation in the Standard Model . .. 12 2 CP Violation in the Kaon System 15 2.1 CP Violation in K0 K¯ 0 Mixing: Indirect CP Violation . 15 − 2.2 εK intheStandardModel ........................... 17 2.3 CP Violation in the Decay: Direct CP Violation . ...... 18 ′ 2.4 εK intheStandardModel ........................... 20 1 2.4.1 ∆I = 2 Contribution .......................... 23 3 2.4.2 ∆I = 2 Contribution .......................... 24 ′ 2.4.3 Discussion on the Theoretical Determinations of εK ......... 25 2.5 Direct CP Violation in Charged Kaons K 3π Decays........... 27 → 3 The Effective Field Theory of the Standard Model at Low Energies 31 3.1 Lowest Order Chiral Perturbation Theory . ..... 31 3.2 Next-to-Leading Order Chiral Lagrangians . ....... 33 3.3 Leading Order Chiral Perturbation Theory Predictions . .......... 38 3.4 CouplingsoftheLeadingOrderLagrangian . ..... 40 4 Charged Kaons K 3π CP Violating Asymmetries at NLO in CHPT 43 → 4.1 Numerical Inputs for the Weak Counterterms . ..... 44 4.1.1 Counterterms of the NLO Weak Chiral Lagrangian . ... 45 4.2 CP-Conserving Observables . .. 46 4.2.1 Slope g .................................. 47 4.2.2 Slopes h and k ............................. 47 4.2.3 DecayRates............................... 49 4.3 CP-Violating Observables at Leading Order . ...... 50 4.3.1 CP-Violating Asymmetries in the Slope g ..............