DOCSLIB.ORG

Math 548: Algebraic Geometry II John Lesieutre September 4, 2020 Announcements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Math 548: Algebraic Geometry II John Lesieutre September 4, 2020 Announcements Math 548: Algebraic geometry II John Lesieutre September 4, 2020 Announcements Note to self: start recording! • HW due Friday. • Office hours? • Functions on Spec LetR be a ring. There is a (slightly awkward) way of • setting up a sheaf onX = SpecR with the O X properties that: What’s the stalk? It’s =R .(P prime ideal) • O X,P P What’s it on opens? (D(f )) =R . • O X f (What are the global functions?) • Very briefly LetR be a ring andU an open subset. • A regular function onU is given by(φ P)P U where • ∈ φ R . P ∈ P We require local compatibility: for anyP U there • ∈ is an openU P andf,g R such that if P � ∈ Q U : a)f Q and b)φ = g (as elts ofR ) ∈ P �∈ Q f Q The formulag/f holds for the function on an open, • but we don’t require there to be one formula that works at every point. Affine schemes An affine scheme is a locally ringed space isomorphic • to the locally ringed space SpecR for a ringR. Note: a morphismR S gives rise to a scheme • → map SpecS SpecR. → (I think we already know this in the case of varieties.) • In fact, every scheme map between them comes from • a ring map. Things to contemplate What are the functions on Speck[x]/(x 2)? • LetX = Spec . What’sD(6)? • Z What are the maps • SpecQ SpecQ[x,y]/(x 2 y 2 7)? → − − Schemes Def: a scheme is a locally ringed space that has an • open cover by affine schemes. Think: projective variety can be covered by affine • slices. “Proj construction” takes the (graded) coordinate • ring of a projective variety and spits out a scheme that stands in for the variety. It’s a bit annoying. • The Proj construction SupposeX P n is a projective variety. • ⊂ Add in a non-closed point to topology for an • irreducible closed subset, just like we did for affines using Spec. Define a sheaf using regular functions in the • O X sense of Shafarevich. That’s a sheaf! • More detail S aZ-graded ring, meaningS= n Sn and • • S S S . m · n ⊂ m+n � Whole thing is an algebra overS . • 0 Homogenous ideal = generated by homogeneous • elements. S = S • + i>0 i Ex: • � Build up Proj as a set, then a topological space, then • a scheme. cont Iff S is homogeneous, bijection between: • ∈ + Homogenous primes in(S )f (it’s graded: • • deg(1/f)= degf) − Primes in the 0-graded piece Spec((S )f )0 (which isn’t • • graded) (One way is easy:((S )f )0 (S )f , and a • • → • homogenous prime pull back to a prime.) Def: points of ProjS are homegenous primes not • • containing the irrelevant ideal. Topology Easy to cook up a graded version of Zariski topology. • V(T) is all homogeneous primes containingT but • notS +. Take those as closed sets. • D(f ) = ProjS V(f). • • \ cont ThenD(f) corresponds to homogenous primes in • (S ) not containingf. • Which is homogenous primes in(S )f • • Which is Spec((S )f )0. • • This gives our cover by affines, one for each • homogeneous elementf. The structure sheaf Look at ratios of homogeneous elements of the same • degree, choosing one such ratio in each stalk, plus local compatibility. On coverD(f), check it restricts to Spec((S )f )0. • • Example S=k[X,Y,Z] (which gives 2) • P A point is(X 2Z,Y 3Z) (i.e.[2,3,1]) • − − Or(X Y). • − Example Letf=X. • A point inD(f) is(X 2Z,Y) (ie[2,0,1]) • − A point not inD(f) is(X,Z) (ie[0,1,0]) • The former gives a prime ink[X,Y,Z] . • X The latter doesn’t. • cont D(f) identified with homogenous primes in • k[X,Y,Z] X . Theorem says those are the same as primes in • (k[X,Y,Z] X )0. Elements look like g(X,Y,Z) ,g homogeneous degd. • X d But that’s just iso to [˛Y,Z]. • So we’ve recovered a standard affine slice. •.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geometry of Multigraded Rings and Embeddings Into Toric Varieties
    GEOMETRY OF MULTIGRADED RINGS AND EMBEDDINGS INTO TORIC VARIETIES ALEX KÜRONYA AND STEFANO URBINATI Dedicated to Bill Fulton on the occasion of his 80th birthday. ABSTRACT. We use homogeneous spectra of multigraded rings to construct toric embeddings of a large family of projective varieties which preserve some of the birational geometry of the underlying variety, generalizing the well-known construction associated to Mori Dream Spaces. CONTENTS Introduction 1 1. Divisorial rings and Cox rings 5 2. Relevant elements in multigraded rings 8 3. Homogeneous spectra of multigraded rings 11 4. Ample families 18 5. Gen divisorial rings and the Mori chamber decomposition in the local setting 23 6. Ample families and embeddings into toric varieties 26 References 31 INTRODUCTION arXiv:1912.04374v1 [math.AG] 9 Dec 2019 In this paper our principal aim is to construct embeddings of projective varieties into simplicial toric ones which partially preserve the birational geometry of the underlying spaces. This we plan to achieve by pursuing two interconnected trains of thought: on one hand we study geometric spaces that arise from multigraded rings, and on the other hand we analyze the relationship between local Cox rings and embeddings of projective varieties into toric ones. The latter contributes to our understanding of birational maps between varieties along the lines of [HK, KKL, LV]. It has been known for a long time how to build a projective variety or scheme starting from a ring graded by the natural numbers. This construction gave rise to the very satisfactory theory 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 14C20. Secondary: 14E25, 14M25, 14E30.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 3 MATH 256B Today We Will Discuss Some More
    LECTURE 3 MATH 256B LECTURES BY: PROFESSOR MARK HAIMAN NOTES BY: JACKSON VAN DYKE Today we will discuss some more examples and features of the Proj construction. 1. Examples of Proj Example 1. As we saw last time, Proj k [x0; ··· ; xn] is classical projective space n Pk . This is covered by affines Xxi , i.e. the same ad hoc affines we found to show it was a scheme to begin with. Explicitly these now look like: ∼ n Xxi = Spec k [x0=xi; ··· ; xn=xi] = Ak where we omit xi=xi. Note that Xxi \ Xxj = Xxixj . Note that classically we only saw this for k = k, but this construction works more generally. Example 2. For any k-algebra A, we can consider Y = Spec A, and Proj A [x0; ··· ; xn]. This will be covered by n-dimensional affines over A in exactly the same way: n Xxi = AA = Spec A [v1; ··· ; vn] : But we can also think of this as A [x] = A ⊗k k [v] so n n AA = Spec A × Ak and therefore n Proj A [x0; ··· ; xn] = Y × Pk : In general, the Proj of something with nontrivial degree 0 part will be the product of Spec of this thing with projective space. 2. Functoriality Recall that since we have the quotient map R ! R=I we get that Spec R=I ,! Spec R is a closed subscheme. In light of this, we might wonder whether or not Proj (R=I) ,! Proj (R) is a closed subscheme. In fact it's not even quite clear if there is an induced map at all.
    [Show full text]
  • SERRE DUALITY and APPLICATIONS Contents 1
    SERRE DUALITY AND APPLICATIONS JUN HOU FUNG Abstract. We carefully develop the theory of Serre duality and dualizing sheaves. We differ from the approach in [12] in that the use of spectral se- quences and the Yoneda pairing are emphasized to put the proofs in a more systematic framework. As applications of the theory, we discuss the Riemann- Roch theorem for curves and Bott's theorem in representation theory (follow- ing [8]) using the algebraic-geometric machinery presented. Contents 1. Prerequisites 1 1.1. A crash course in sheaves and schemes 2 2. Serre duality theory 5 2.1. The cohomology of projective space 6 2.2. Twisted sheaves 9 2.3. The Yoneda pairing 10 2.4. Proof of theorem 2.1 12 2.5. The Grothendieck spectral sequence 13 2.6. Towards Grothendieck duality: dualizing sheaves 16 3. The Riemann-Roch theorem for curves 22 4. Bott's theorem 24 4.1. Statement and proof 24 4.2. Some facts from algebraic geometry 29 4.3. Proof of theorem 4.5 33 Acknowledgments 34 References 35 1. Prerequisites Studying algebraic geometry from the modern perspective now requires a some- what substantial background in commutative and homological algebra, and it would be impractical to go through the many definitions and theorems in a short paper. In any case, I can do no better than the usual treatments of the various subjects, for which references are provided in the bibliography. To a first approximation, this paper can be read in conjunction with chapter III of Hartshorne [12]. Also in the bibliography are a couple of texts on algebraic groups and Lie theory which may be beneficial to understanding the latter parts of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relative Proj Construction
    The Relative Proj Construction Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Earlier we defined the Proj of a graded ring. In these notes we introduce a relative version of this construction, which is the Proj of a sheaf of graded algebras S over a scheme X. This construction is useful in particular because it allows us to construct the projective space bundle associated to a locally free sheaf E , and it allows us to give a definition of blowing up with respect to an arbitrary sheaf of ideals. Contents 1 Relative Proj 1 2 The Sheaf Associated to a Graded Module 5 2.1 Quasi-Structures ..................................... 14 3 The Graded Module Associated to a Sheaf 15 3.1 Ring Structure ...................................... 21 4 Functorial Properties 21 5 Ideal Sheaves and Closed Subchemes 25 6 The Duple Embedding 27 7 Twisting With Invertible Sheaves 31 8 Projective Space Bundles 36 1 Relative Proj See our Sheaves of Algebras notes (SOA) for the definition of sheaves of algebras, sheaves of graded algebras and their basic properties. In particular note that a sheaf of algebras (resp. graded algebras) is not necessarily commutative. Although in SOA we deal with noncommutative algebras over a ring, here “A-algebra” will refer to a commutative algebra over a commutative ring A. Example 1. Let X be a scheme and F a sheaf of modules on X. In our Special Sheaves of Algebras (SSA) notes we defined the following structures: • The relative tensor algebra T(F ), which is a sheaf of graded OX -algebras with the property 0 that T (F ) = OX .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Varieties in Weighted Projective Space
    An introduction to varieties in weighted projective space Timothy Hosgood November 4, 2020 Written in 2015. Abstract Weighted projective space arises when we consider the usual geometric definition for projective space and allow for non-trivial weights. On its own, this extra freedom gives rise to more than enough interesting phenomena, but it is the fact that weighted projective space arises naturally in the context of classical algebraic geometry that can be surprising. Using the Riemann-Roch theorem to calculate ℓ(E, nD) where E is a non- singular cubic curve inside P2 and D = p ∈ E is a point we obtain a non-negatively graded ring R(E) = ⊕n>0L(E, nD). This gives rise to an embedding of E inside the weighted projective space P(1, 2, 3). To understand a space it is always a good idea to look at the things inside it. The main content of this paper is the introduction and explanation of many basic concepts of weighted projective space and its varieties. There are already many brilliant texts on the topic ([14, 10], to name but a few) but none of them are aimed at an audience with only an undergraduate’s knowledge of mathematics. This paper hopes to partially fill this gap whilst maintaining a good balance between ‘interesting’ and ‘simple’.1 The main result of this paper is a reasonably simple degree-genus formula for non- singular ‘sufficiently general’ plane curves, proved using not much more than the Riemann- Hurwitz formula. Contents arXiv:1604.02441v5 [math.AG] 3 Nov 2020 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Notation, conventions, assumptions, and citations .
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 2 MATH 256A 1. Proj Construction Recall That Last Time We
    LECTURE 2 MATH 256A LECTURES BY: PROFESSOR MARK HAIMAN NOTES BY: JACKSON VAN DYKE 1. Proj construction Recall that last time we did the following. Let R be an N-graded ring, and define the irrelevant ideal: M R+ = Rd : d>0 Recall we defined this because V (R+) ⊆ Spec R is the `Gm fixed locus.' Then we define Proj R = P 2 Spec R n V R+ j P is graded; : These are the generic points of the collection of Gm invariant irreducible closed subvarieties of Spec R which are not Gm fixed. 1.1. Scheme structure. Now we need to produce a sheaf of functions to make it a scheme. The idea here is that on some prime P , we look at RP , but we want the degree 0 part. But there is an issue, which is that RP isn't graded in general. One ad hoc way is to just invert the homogeneous elements, and then it is graded so we can just take the 0 degree part. But this is sort of poorly motivated, so we will do the following. First of all, R+ is by definition generated by homogeneous elements of positive degree. If Y = Spec R, then Y n V (R+) is covered by the basic −1 opens Yf = Spec R f = Spec S for f 2 Rd where d > 0. Note that S is now a −1 Z graded ring since f has negative degree. Also note that Xf = Yf \ X consists of the graded prime ideals P in Rf . Then we have some degree 0 part S0 ⊆ S, so of course Spec S ! Spec S0.
    [Show full text]
  • An Informal Introduction to Blow-Ups
    An informal introduction to blow-ups Siddarth Kannan Motivation. A variety over C, or a complex algebraic variety, means a locally ringed1 topological space X, such that each point P 2 X has an open neighborhood U with U =∼ Spec A, where A = C[x1; : : : ; xn]=I is a finitely generated C-algebra which is also a domain, i.e. I is taken to be a prime ideal; we also require X to be Hausdorff when we view it with the analytic topology.2 Good examples are affine varieties (i.e. X = Spec A with A as above), which we've dealt with exten- n sively in 2520; the first non-affine examples are the complex projective space PC and its irreducible Zariski closed subsets, cut out by homogeneous prime ideals of C[x0; : : : ; xn] provide a large class of examples, called complex projective varieties. For an introduction to projective varieties from the classical perspective of homogeneous coordinates, see [Rei90]. For scheme theory and the modern perspective on varieties, see [Har10]. It's natural to wonder how a variety X might fail to be a manifold, when we view X with the analytic (as opposed to Zariski) topology. The issue is that varieties may have singularities, which, in the analytic topology, are points that do not have neighborhoods homeomorphic to Cn. Definition 1. Let X be a variety. Then P 2 X is nonsingular point if for any open affine neighborhood Spec A of P in X, we have that AP is a regular local ring. Otherwise P is singular.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Geometry UT Austin, Spring 2016 M390C NOTES: ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY
    Algebraic Geometry UT Austin, Spring 2016 M390C NOTES: ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY ARUN DEBRAY MAY 5, 2016 These notes were taken in UT Austin’s Math 390c (Algebraic Geometry) class in Spring 2016, taught by David Ben-Zvi. I live-TEXed them using vim, and as such there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Thanks to Shamil Asgarli, Adrian Clough, Feng Ling, Tom Oldfield, and Souparna Purohit for fixing a few mistakes. Contents 1. The Course Awakens: 1/19/163 2. Attack of the Cones: 1/21/166 3. The Yoneda Chronicles: 1/26/16 10 4. The Yoneda Chronicles, II: 1/28/16 13 5. The Spectrum of a Ring: 2/2/16 16 6. Functoriality of Spec: 2/4/16 20 7. The Zariski Topology: 2/9/16 23 8. Connectedness, Irreducibility, and the Noetherian Condition: 2/11/16 26 9. Revenge of the Sheaf: 2/16/16 29 10. Revenge of the Sheaf, II: 2/18/16 32 11. Locally Ringed Spaces: 2/23/16 34 12. Affine Schemes are Opposite to Rings: 2/25/16 38 13. Examples of Schemes: 3/1/16 40 14. More Examples of Schemes: 3/3/16 44 15. Representation Theory of the Multiplicative Group: 3/8/16 47 16. Projective Schemes and Proj: 3/10/16 50 17. Vector Bundles and Locally Free Sheaves: 3/22/16 52 18. Localization and Quasicoherent Sheaves: 3/24/16 56 19. The Hilbert Scheme of Points: 3/29/16 59 20. Differentials: 3/31/16 62 21.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proj Construction
    The Proj Construction Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006 Contents 1 Basic Properties 1 2 Functorial Properties 2 3 Products 6 4 Linear Morphisms 9 5 Projective Morphisms 9 6 Dimensions of Schemes 11 7 Points of Projective Space 12 1 Basic Properties Definition 1. Let A be a ring. A graded A-algebra is an A-algebra R which is also a graded ring in such a way that if r ∈ Rd then ar ∈ Rd for all a ∈ A. That is, Rd is an A-submodule of R for all d ≥ 0. Equivalently a graded A-algebra is a morphism of graded rings A −→ R where we grade A by setting A0 = A, An = 0 for n > 0. A morphism of graded A-algebras is a morphism of A-algebras which preserves grade. Equivalently, this is a morphism of graded rings which is also a morphism of A-modules, or a morphism of graded rings R −→ S making the following diagram commute R / S _@@ ? @@ @@ @ A Let S be a graded A-algebra, and let X = P rojS. Then there is a canonical morphism of rings θ : A −→ Γ(X, P rojS) defined by θ(a)(p) = a/1 ∈ S(p) Where as usual, a denotes the element a · 1 of S. By Ex 2.4 this induces a morphism of schemes f : P rojS −→ SpecA. If γ : A −→ S gives the A-algebra structure on S, then an element a ∈ A is mapped to the maximal ideal of OP rojS,p via A −→ Γ(X, P rojS) −→ OP rojS,p if and −1 only if a ∈ γ p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cox Rings Particular Class Toric Schemes
    UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX Faculté de Matématiques Mémoire de Master 2 COX RINGS FOR A PARTICULAR CLASS OF TORIC SCHEMES Roberto GUALDI Advisor: Prof. Alain YGER July 2014 To my sheperd, that maketh me to lie down in green pastures and leadeth me beside still water. Preface The initial aim of this thesis was to read and understand the paper “The Homogeneous Coordinate Ring of a Toric Variety” (1995) by Cox [2]. But it resulted obvious from the beginning that the article was impossible to approach without a clear understanding of what a toric variety is. Hence the author referred to the good book by Cox [4] and to presentation of Fulton [7]. These basics were able to furnish all the instruments in order to understand the main ideas of the article, but had the limit of treating all the theory from the point of view of classical varieties over C. The natural question that arose was: what happens if one wants to define toric varieties not on the base field C, but on other algebraically closed base fields k? And is it possible to extend the theory to not necessarily algebraically closed fields, such as number fields? And, since "appetite comes with eating" the final question was: how to extend the theory on any base ring? Clearly this kind of questions needed to involve the language of schemes. The first thing to do was to translate all the base objects used by Cox into schemes terms. In particular it was necessary to understand what is a variety in this new language, what is an object that is both a group and a variety, what is an action of this objects and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasicoherent Sheaves on Projective Schemes Over F1 3
    QUASICOHERENT SHEAVES ON PROJECTIVE SCHEMES OVER F1 OLIVER LORSCHEID AND MATT SZCZESNY ABSTRACT. Given a graded monoid A with 1, one can construct a projective monoid scheme MProj(A) analogous to Proj(R) of a graded ring R. This paper is concerned with the study of quasicoherent sheaves on MProj(A), and we prove several basic results regarding these. We show that: (1) every quasicoherent sheaf F on MProj(A) can be constructed from a graded A–set in analogy with the construction of quasicoherent sheaves on Proj(R) from graded R–modules (2) if F is coherent on MProj(A), then F(n) is globally generated for large enough n, and consequently, that F is a quotient of a finite direct sum of invertible sheaves (3) if F is coherent on MProj(A), then Γ(MProj(A), F) is a finite pointed set The last part of the paper is devoted to classifying coherent sheaves on P1 in terms of certain directed graphs and gluing data. The classification of these over F1 is shown to be much richer and combinatorially interesting than in the case of ordinary P1, and several new phenomena emerge. 1. INTRODUCTION The last twenty years have seen the development of several notions of "algebraic geometry over F1". This quest is motivated by a variety of questions in arXiv:1602.05233v1 [math.AG] 16 Feb 2016 arithmetic, representation theory, algebraic geometry, and combinatorics. Since several surveys [9, 11, 18] of the motivating ideas exist, we will not attempt to sketch them here. One of the simplest approaches to algebraic geometry over F1 is via the theory of monoid schemes, originally developed by Kato [13], Deitmar [4], and Connes-Consani [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Avoidance of Lin by Teichmüller Curves in a Stratum of M
    1 Avoidance of Lin3 by Teichmüller Curves in a Stratum of M4;2 J Z D T S JP. D. G WS D. A K P. D. F H I A G D M K I T J Declaration Erklärung I hereby confirm that this document has Ich erkläre hiermit die vorliegende been composed by myself, and describes Arbeit selbstständig verfasst zu haben my own work, unless otherwise und keine außer den angegebenen acknowledged in the text. ellen verwendet zu haben. Karlsruhe, th January iii Contents Introduction vii Preliminaries . Sheaves ....................................... .. Presheaves and Sheaves ......................... .. Stalks ................................... .. Sheaves on Different Spaces ....................... . Schemes ...................................... .. Affine Schemes .............................. .. Schemes .................................. .. Products .................................. .. Projective Schemes ............................ . Geometric Aspects ................................. . Projective Subschemes and Coherent Sheaves .................. .. Closed Subschemes ............................ .. Twisted Sheaves ............................. .. Pulling Back and Pushing Forward ................... .. Global Constructions ........................... .. Ample and Very Ample Sheaves ..................... . Cohomology of Sheaves .............................. .. Derived Functors ............................. .. Invariants ................................. Algebraic Curves . Linear Systems and Projective Morphisms ................... .
    [Show full text]