DOCSLIB.ORG

John Jay College City University of New York Econ 213: Political Economy Spring2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Jay College City University of New York Econ 213: Political Economy Spring2020 John Jay College City University of New York Econ 213: Political Economy Spring2020 Instructor: Ian J. Seda-Irizarry, Ph.D. Email: [email protected] Office: 9.63.10 NB Office Telephone: 212-393-6425 Office Hours: Tu-Th: 2:00-3:00 pm or by appointment A) Overview: This course exposes students to one of the most sophisticated, yet misunderstood and marginalized, theories of social science. Focus will be on the contributions of the thinker who, perhaps better than anybody else, appropriated and critiqued a whole tradition of socio-economic analysis, which included thinkers such as William Petty, Francois Quesnay, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus, and John Stuart Mill. We are referring to Karl Marx. Marx is one of those figures from the history of thought whose contributions had been considered by many as redundant, inconsistent, simply outdated, and even dangerous. Still, his thought has ferociously knocked at the door once again in the face of capitalisms’ problems. The purpose of this course is to directly read Marx’s mature theorizations about how capital works to hopefully get a grasp of an understanding of capitalism as a system which suffers from recurrent crises, instabilities, business cycles and uneven development — all of them characteristics that mainstream economic theory tends to consider as secondary compared to the harmonious arrangement that is said to prevail in a market economy that is supposed to deliver the goods while providing the basis for a democratic political system. In this class we will mainly focus on Marx’s magnum opus, Volume 1 of Capital, and we will also read some excerpts from Volumes 2 and 3. At the same time we will occasionally make a comparison between Marx’s contributions and other economic theories, such as the Keynesian and Neoclassical. Finally, we will draw on developments by other theorists who have tried to refine, extend, and critique Marx’s thought. B) Learning Objectives: 1. Understand how capitalism is different from other ways of organizing the production and distribution of goods and services. 2. Comprehend why under capitalism extreme wealth and extreme poverty co-exist. 3. Have a general idea as to why crises are inherent to the system. 4. Development of class analysis to grasp political and economic tensions and their potential resolutions. 5. Ability to see how the profit criterion shapes societal outcomes in contradictory ways. 1 C) Texts (* means required) Marx, K., Capital, Volume I, New York: Vintage Books, 1977 or 1992. * Complementary Texts Fine, B. (2010). Marx's Capital, Pluto Press. (MC from herafter) Harvey, D. (2010). A Companion to Marx’s Capital, London: Verso. Wolff, R. and Resnick, S. (2012). Contending Economics Theories: Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and Marxian. Massachusetts: MIT Press C) Course Requirements: 1) Notebook for Readings: Apart from the usual notes that students take during the course of the lecture, there will be a requirement of a second, separate notebook. The purpose is to have students take notes while they read Capital. They are expected to copy down quotes (sometimes entire paragraphs) and make annotations to demonstrate that they are reading and struggling with the text (4-5 hours of reading are expected per week). The notes are expected to be scanned/photographed and uploaded to Blackboard on a weekly basis. This will count for 10% of your grade. 2) Homework and Quiz Assignments: A total of 6 assignments will be distributed during the semester, either a quiz or a homework. At the end I will count only the top 5 grades. This will account for 25% of the grade. 3) Class Participation and Attendance: Students are expected to come to class and actively participate after reading the assigned material. This will not be a course with me doing all the talking! Attendance is compulsory. This will account for 15% of the grade. (10% participation + 5% attendance). 4) One midterm + One Final Exam: Exams will be in essay form and will be take-home. If you want to write a final paper instead of taking final exam, you have to let me know by the date of the midterm exam so that we can discuss potential topics. Each exam will be 25% of the grade. 5) Extra Credit: Throughout the semester there will be a series of talks at community hour. For each talk you attend you will receive 1 percentage point of your final grade. The maximum amount of points you can accumulate for extra credit is 3. The schedule for this semester will be announced soon. D) Academic Honesty: All written work submitted must be composed by you and not copied from another source. Any wording taken from another source must be put in quotation marks with the source cited. Plagiarism -- the use of someone else's writing without citing the source – will result of a grade of F on that exam or paper. Students should be cognizant of John Jay’s policy on academic honesty. It may be perused at http://www.jjay.cuny.edu/web_images/Policyand_Procedures.pdf *Use of phones or computers is strictly prohibited. 2 E) Topics (asterisk means required reading) I: Historical and Biographical Background Readings and Videos: Blackburn, R. (2012). Marx and Lincoln, Jacobin. * Lenin, V. (1915). Karl Marx, Lenin's Collected Works, Vol. 21. Available at MIA http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/granat/ch01.htm * Lafargue, P. (1890). Reminiscenses of Marx. Available at MIA: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lafargue/1890/xx/marx.htm Sacristán, M. (1983). Karl Marx, Sobre Marx y Marxismo, pp 277-308. Videos: Marx in Soho* Classic texts examining Marx’s life in detail: McLellan, D. (2006) [1973]. Karl Marx: A Biography. Palgrave-Macmillan Mehring, F (2010) [1936]. Karl Marx: The Story of his Life. Routledge. II: Marx's Method Readings: Ollman, B. The Meaning of Dialectics. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/projects/ollman/docs/dd_ch01.php * Hegel, G.W.F. (1808). Who thinks abstractly? Available at: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/se/abstract.htm* Capital, Preface to First Edition and Preface to French Edition. * Marx, K (1843) Letter to Ruge, “For a Critique of Everything Existing”. Available at MIA http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/letters/43_09.htm * Marx, K. (1859). Preface to a Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy. Available at MIA http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/preface.htm Marx, K. (1857). The Method of Political Economy. Available at MIA http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch01.htm MC; Chapter 1 3 Lenin, V.I. On The Question of Dialectics https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1915/misc/x02.htm Sweezy, P. (1942). The Theory of Capitalist Development, pp 11-20. Resnick S. and R. Wolff. (1982). Marxist Epistemology: The Critique of Economic Determinism. Stedman, G. (1990). Dialectical Reasoning, The New Palgrave: Marxian Economics, pp 121- 128. Marcuse, H. (1941). A Note on Dialectics III: Commodity Production and Money Readings: Capital, Ch 1, 2, and 3 * MC, Ch. 2 IV: Capital and Exploitation Readings: Capital, Chapters 4, 5, 6 * MC, Ch. 3, pp 27-34. Shaikh, A. (1990). Exploitation, The New Palgrave: Marxian Economics, pp 165-169. * Shaikh, A. (1990). Capital as a Social Relation, The New Palgrave: Marxian Economics, pp 72-77. * Tregenna, F. (2009). Services in Marxian Economic Thought. Available at: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/dae/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0935.pdf Resnick, S. (1998) Class Processes, Encyclopedia of Political Economy, pp 98-101. V: The Production of Absolute and Relative Surplus Value Readings: Capital, Chapters 7, 8, 9.1, 9.2, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18* MC, Ch 3, pp 35-43 VI: The Division of Labor, Manufacture, Machinery and Large Scale Industry Readings: Capital, Chapters 13, 14 and 15 (pp 492- 564)* Golombia, D. (2015). The Amazonization of Everything. Available at: 4 https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/amazon-google-facebook-privacy-bezos/ * Videos: Amazon’s Truth Behind the Click: Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkNO8J4XSIc Foxconn Apple Factory Tour Charlie Chaplin, Modern Times (1936) VII: Productive Capital and Distributions of Surplus-Value Readings: Capital, Chapters 23-25 Capital 2, chaps. 2-4. Available online. Capital, Vol. 3 (New York: Vintage, 1977), Chapters. 13-15, 48, 49, and 51. Available online. F. Engels, "Capital and Surplus-Value: Conclusions," in Marx-Engels Collected Works, vol. 25, 196-205 (New York: International Publishers, 1987). Available online. K. Marx, Grundrisse (London: New Left Review, 1973), pp. 745-58 VIII: The History of Capitalism Readings: Capital, Chapters 26-33 Zinn, H. The Real Christopher Columbus. Available at: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/10/the-real-christopher-columbus/ * McNally, D. (1993). Against the Market: Political Economy, Market Socialism, and the Marxist Critique. New York: Verso. McNally, D. (2012). Monsters of the Market, Ch 1. Polanyi, K. (2001)[1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. VIII: Finance and Crisis Readings: Capital, Vol. 3, Chapters 21-27. Available Online.* 5 J. Crotty, “The Centrality of Money, Credit, and Financial Intermediation in Marx’s Crisis Theory: An Interpretation of Marx’s Methodology.” in Rethinking Marxism: Struggles in Marxist theory: Essays for Harry Magdoff and Paul Sweezy, ed. S. Resnick and R. Wolff, 45-81 (Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 1985). Available at: http://people.umass.edu/crotty/CentralityofMoney.pdf D. Kotz, “Over-Investment and the Current Crisis” Available at http://people.umass.edu/dmkotz/OverInvestment_and_the_Crisis_11_01.pdf Orhangazi O. and I. Seda-Irizarry (2010). The Role of Finance in the Latest Capitalist Crisis, in Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Center for Popular Economics, pp 65-74, June 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lenin and the Russian Civil War
    Lenin and the Russian Civil War In the months and years after the fall of Tsar Nicholas II’s government, Russia went through incredible, often violent changes. The society was transformed from a peasant society run by an absolute monarchy into a worker’s state run by an all- powerful group that came to be known as the Communist Party. A key to this transformation is Vladimir Lenin. Who Was Lenin? • Born into a wealthy middle-class family background. • Witnessed (when he was 17) the hanging of his brother Aleksandr for revolutionary activity. • Kicked out his university for participating in anti- Tsarist protests. • Took and passed his law exams and served in various law firms in St. Petersburg and elsewhere. • Arrested and sent to Siberia for 3 years for transporting and distributing revolutionary literature. • When WWI started, argued that it should become a revolution of the workers throughout Europe. • Released and lived mostly in exile (Switzerland) until 1917. • Adopted the name “Lenin” (he was born Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) in exile to hide his activities from the Tsar’s secret police. Lenin and the French Revolution Lenin admired the revolutionaries in France 100 years before his time, though he believed they didn’t go far enough – too much wealth was left in middle class hands. His Bolsheviks used the chaotic and incomplete nature of the French Revolution as a guide - they believed that in order for a communist revolution to succeed, it would need firm leadership from a small group of party leaders – a very different vision from Karl Marx. So, in some ways, Lenin was like Robin Hood – taking from the rich and giving to the poor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance and Shortcomings of Karl Marx
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 3 2018 The Significance and Shortcomings of Karl Marx Chris Wright Hunter College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Chris (2018) "The Significance and Shortcomings of Karl Marx," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.6.2.008310 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol6/iss2/3 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Significance and Shortcomings of Karl Marx Abstract In this essay I explain both why Karl Marx remains an important thinker and why he is in some respects inadequate. I focus on the central issue of 'materialism vs. idealism,' and briefly explore ways in which contemporary intellectuals still haven't assimilated the insights of historical materialism. In the last section of the paper I examine the greatest weakness of Marxism, its theory of proletarian revolution, and propose an alternative conceptualization that both updates the theory for the twenty-first century and is more faithful to historical materialism than Marx's own conception was. Keywords Karl Marx, Marxism, socialism Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Class, Race and Corporate Power: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/ classracecorporatepower/vol6/iss2/3 I often have occasion to think that, as an “intellectual,” I’m very lucky to be alive at this time in history, at the end of the long evolution from Herodotus and the pre-Socratic philosophers to Chomsky and modern science.
    [Show full text]
  • Streeten's Major Writings Paul Marlor SWEEZY
    .... 642 Paul Marlor SWEEZY Paul Marlor SWEEZY 643 I out agreeing with the late David McCord Wright, who once said, 'When It was under these circumstances that acquired a mission in life, not all at once and self-consciously, but gradually and through a practice that had a logic of its people tell me I am fuzzy, I reply, "life is fuzzy'", the heterodox dis�enters own. That mission was to do what I could to make Marxism an integral and prefer, I think, to be accused of fuzziness. They prefer to be vaguely nght to respected part of the intellectual life of the country, or, put in other terms, to take being precisely wrong. It is a matter of taste. The orthodox may say, part in establishing a serious and authentic North American brand of Marxism. 'Reductionism is not the occupational disease of economists, it is their occu­ pation.' But if in the process they throw out the baby instead of the bathwater, In pursuing these interests at Harvard, Sweezy received encouragement the reduction surely loses its point. from the great conservative economist Joseph Schumpeter, whose analysis of the origins, development and impending decline of capitalism revealed a Streeten's Major Writings complex and critical appreciation of Marxist analysis. 17 (1949), 'The Theory of Profit', The Manchester School, (3), September. Obtaining his Ph.D. in 1937, Sweezy took a job as an instructor at Harvard (1950a), 'Mangel des Preismechanismus', Vo//beschdftigung, Cologne: Bundverlag. (l 950b), 'The Inappropriateness of Simple "Elasticity" Concepts m the Analysis of Interna­ until 1939 when he rose to the rank of assistant professor.
    [Show full text]
  • J.S. Mill and Marx on Freedom and Alternative Structures of Political Economy: a Reconstructive, Critical and Comparative Inquiry ［ 第一日目 ］ 第二会場 Armando C
    J.S. Mill and Marx on Freedom and Alternative Structures of Political Economy: A Reconstructive, Critical and Comparative Inquiry ［ 第一日目 ］ 第二会場 Armando C. Ochangco, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of the Philippines Abstract: The proposed paper is intended to provide critical and comparative perspectives on the ideas of freedom to be found in the works of John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx, and how these normative conceptions relate to their visions of alternative economic, social and political systems. Drawing ideas and perspectives from their classic texts (by Mill, such as those from: On Liberty, Principles of Political Economy, On the Subjection of Women, Utilitarianism; and by Marx, such as those from: The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Critique of the Gotha Program, German Ideology, Capital, among others), I shall provide interpretive and reconstructive accounts of the conceptions of freedom which may be implicit or explicit in their written works, and how they relate to their alternative conceptions of the political economy—the latter understood as alternative configurations of socio-economic and political structures. With these possible interpretations and reconstructions, I shall proceed to argue that these, in certain ways, different but related conceptions of freedom, based on ideas which may be implicit or explicit in their works, are crucial to understanding their normative conceptions of political economy. Moreover, I shall suggest that their views on freedom go deeper and more systematic than what tends
    [Show full text]
  • Capital As Process and the History of Capitalism
    Jonathan Levy Capital as Process and the History of Capitalism In the wake of the Great Recession, a new cycle of scholarship opened on the history of American capitalism. This occurred, however, without much specification of the subject at hand. In this essay, I offer a conceptualization of capitalism, by focus- ing on its root—capital. Much historical writing has treated capital as a physical factor of production. Against such a “mate- rialist” capital concept, I define capital as a pecuniary process of forward-looking valuation, associated with investment. Engag- ing recent work across literatures, I try to show how this con- ceptualization of capital and capitalism helps illuminate many core dynamics of modern economic life. Keywords: capitalism, capital theory, economic thought, finance, Industrial Revolution, Keynes, money, slavery, Veblen ecently, the so-called new history of capitalism has helped bring Reconomic life back closer to the center of the professional historical agenda. But what further point might it now serve—especially for schol- ars toiling in the fields of business and economic history all the while independent of historiographical fashion and trend? In the wake of the U.S. financial panic of 2008 and the Great Reces- sion that followed, in the field of U.S. history a new cycle of scholarship on the history of American capitalism opened, but without all that much conceptualization of the subject at hand—capitalism. If there has been one shared impulse, it is probably the study of commodification. Follow the commodity wherever it may lead, across thresholds of space, time, and the ever-expanding boundaries of the market.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside Cliodynamics
    UC Riverside Cliodynamics Title Capitalist Systems are Societal Constructs: Not “Clouds” or “Clocks,” but “City States”: A Review of Does Capitalism Have a Future? by Immanuel Wallerstein, Randall Collins, Michael Mann, Georgi Derluguian, and Craig Calhoun (Oxford University Press,... Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z63z6jt Journal Cliodynamics, 6(2) Author Scott, Bruce Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.21237/C7clio6229140 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution Capitalist Systems are Societal Constructs: Not “Clouds” or “Clocks,” but “City States” A Review of Does Capitalism Have a Future? by Immanuel Wallerstein, Randall Collins, Michael Mann, Georgi Derluguian, and Craig Calhoun (Oxford University Press, 2013) Bruce Scott Harvard University Does Capitalism Have a Future? is the work of five distinguished senior authors addressing the future of capitalism and its recent past. Their book warns that “something big looms on the horizon: a structural crisis much bigger than the recent great recession. Over the next three or four decades, capitalists of the world may simply find it impossible to make their usual investment decisions due to overcrowding of world markets and inadequate accounting for rising social costs. In this situation, capitalism would end in the frustration of the capitalists themselves.” The authors have chosen a very broad and important topic
    [Show full text]
  • Planned and Command Economies
    Pambazuka - Zambia: Less Than $1 Means Family of 6 Can Eat http://pambazuka.org/en/category/development/6112 English DEVELOPMENT Français Português Zambia: Less Than $1 Means Family of 6 Can Eat Home 2002-02-28, Issue 55 Current Issue http://pambazuka.org/en/category/development/6112 Author List Tag Cloud Printer friendly version Feedback She is sitting on a warped stool in a roofless market with the ferocious midday sun Back Issues bearing down on her. A sinewy woman with deep-set eyes and sharp features that About jut sphinxlike from under her black head scarf, Rose Shanzi awoke with a start this SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE! Advertising morning, and the primordial question that jarred her from sleep is stalking her again: Will she and her children eat today? Newsfeeds email: Broadcasts Less Than $1 Means Family of 6 Can Eat Publications Awards By Jon Jeter Washington Post Foreign Service DONATE TO PAMBAZUKA NEWS! Subscribe Tuesday, February 19, 2002; Page A01 Friends of Pambazuka MARAMBA, Zambia -- She is sitting on a warped stool in a roofless market Action alerts with the ferocious midday sun bearing down on her. A sinewy woman with GET INVOLVED Editors’ corner deep-set eyes Features and sharp features that jut sphinxlike from under her black head scarf, Rose Shanzi awoke with a start this morning, and the primordial question Announcements that jarred her from Dakar World Social Forum 2011 sleep is stalking her again: Comment & analysis Will she and her children eat today? PAMBAZUKA NEWS Tributes to Tajudeen Latest tweets Advocacy & campaigns It is always a compound question.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poverty of Philosophy and Its Contemporary Relevance
    Crisis, Revolution, and the Meaning of Progress: The Poverty of Philosophy and its Contemporary Relevance Michael Joseph Roberto Proudhon and Marx ABSTRACT: In 1847, Marx wrote The Poverty of Philosophy, his polemical response to Pierre Joseph Proudhon’s System of Economical Contradictions Or, The Philosophy of Poverty, published a year earlier. Marx and Proudhon were the principal antagonists in the struggle for influence and control of the emerging European workers movement then fueled by the first great crisis of modern capitalism. While Marx propagated communist revolution as a solution to the crisis, Proudhon sought to preserve “good capitalism” by attempting to formulate a new political economy that would reconcile contradictions of capitalist exchange by means of reciprocal agreements and transactions; in a word, mutualism. In The Poverty of Philosophy, Marx took Proudhon to task for creating a massive “dialectical phantasmagoria” in the System of Economical Contradictions. Usually regarded as his first detailed treatment of political economy, Marx’s book also contains an implicit conception of social and historical progress based on the principles of contradiction, paradox, and Copyright © 2009 by Michael Joseph Roberto and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Michael Joseph Roberto 2 practice. Today, as the U.S. experiences an irreversible and possibly terminal capitalist crisis, Marx’s polemic against Proudhon remains instructive as an historical, theoretical, and practical-political guide. Key features of the Marx- Proudhon divide in the 1840s are now being recast in contemporary guises and forms. The Left must distinguish between revolutionary Marxist solutions and variations of the New Proudhonism. While Marxism holds the potential for revolutionary, socialist transformation and renewed social progress, the New Proudhonism seeks to save “good capitalism” – ironically and tragically, carrying with it the plausibility of a more coercive and barbarous system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Letter to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
    A Letter to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Karl Marx 946 Communist Way London , United Kingdom W11 2BQ Dear Comrade Karl and Comrade Friedrich: I write to you in appreciation and admiration. I have just read your Manifesto of the Communist Party and I have found it to be an outstanding analysis of industrial society. However, times have changed. And while I found your manifesto to be an incredibly well-written, scathing critique of capitalism, a primer on communism, a new way of looking at history and an incisive sociological study, the manifesto needs to be updated and given a facelift for modern times. Nevertheless, your work today is just as pertinent as it was in 1848. The collapse of the United States’ real estate market and the ensuing global recession of 2008 have engendered renewed interests in your ideas. Communism has a seat at the table of ideas in the modern world if it can to be adapted to the modern problems of capitalism by becoming more democratic, respecting the individual, adapting to a market based economy and readdressing the problems of wealth inequality and quality of life. I have found the most startling aspect of your manifesto to be its complete disregard for democracy. Your manifesto is a vitriolic attack on the iniquities of capitalism and offers communism as the sole alternative. Yet, the modern era, with its emphasis on human rights, has obviated the totalitarian nature that your essay suggests. The horrors of starvation and genocide in the Soviet Union, Cambodia , Red China and North Korea have made people wary of anything that reeks of communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 2 2021 Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Chris Wright [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Chris (2021) "Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.9.1.009647 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol9/iss1/2 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Abstract In the twenty-first century, it is time that Marxists updated the conception of socialist revolution they have inherited from Marx, Engels, and Lenin. Slogans about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” “smashing the capitalist state” and carrying out a social revolution from the commanding heights of a reconstituted state are completely obsolete. In this article I propose a reconceptualization that accomplishes several purposes: first, it explains the logical and empirical problems with Marx’s classical theory of revolution; second, it revises the classical theory to make it, for the first time, logically consistent with the premises of historical materialism; third, it provides a (Marxist) theoretical grounding for activism in the solidarity economy, and thus partially reconciles Marxism with anarchism; fourth, it accounts for the long-term failure of all attempts at socialist revolution so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxian Theory Winter 2006 Professor Micha
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Department of History History HITO 111/HIGR 211: Marxian Theory Winter 2006 Professor Michael A. Bernstein 3410 Literature [Warren Campus] 534-6270/534-1070 <[email protected]> historyweb.ucsd.edu/bernstein/ A survey and examination of some of the most important writings of Marx concerning economic and social theory and historical analysis. Emphasis on the theory of value, production, technical change, reproduction, and accumulation. Some consideration will also be made of certain neo-Marxist contributions and critiques. Required and Recommended Texts: +Karl Marx, Capital (3 volumes). +Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The German Ideology. +Karl Marx, The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. +Karl Marx, Grundrisse. +Karl Marx, Pre-capitalist Economic Formations. +Paul Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development. E. von Böhm-Bawerk, Karl Marx and the Close of His Sytem. N. Bukharin, The Economic Theory of the Leisure Class. M. Dobb, Political Economy and Capitalism. I. Rubin, Essays on Marx's Theory of Value. J. Robinson, An Essay on Marxian Economics. R. Meek, Studies in the Labor Theory of Value. D. Horowitz, Marx and Modern Economics. M. Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism. M. Blaug, Economic Theory in Retrospect. W. Williams, The Great Evasion: An Essay on the Contemporary Relevance of Karl Marx and on the Wisdom of Admitting the Heretic into the Dialogue About America’s Future + -- Ordered at the University Bookstore in the Price Center. Course Requirements: There will be one class meeting per week. Student participation in class discussion is encouraged and expected. Those readings starred (*) on the reading list are especially important.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy (PHIL) 1
    Philosophy (PHIL) 1 PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) PHIL 3000 Plato's Metaphysics (4 Credits) A systematic study of Plato's Middle and Late Period Dialogues that focuses on his arguments for the existence of abstract objects and the development of Plato's theory of Forms. Prerequisite: At least Junior standing or permission of instructor. PHIL 3003 Plato's Theory of Knowledge (4 Credits) A systematic investigation of Plato's treatments of knowledge throughout the dialogues with a focus on the theory of recollection, Forms as objects of knowledge, the relationship between the Forms and perceptual experience, and the challenges posed by notions of true and false belief. Prerequisites: At least Junior standing or permission of instructor. PHIL 3005 Cosmopolitics (4 Credits) This class will be a close reading of Plato's dialogue Timaeus, with a special focus on the cosmological, theological, and political dimensions of the text. PHIL 3010 Great Thinkers: Aristotle (4 Credits) A study of Aristotle's central theories and doctrines. Prerequisite: junior standing or instructor's permission. PHIL 3011 Great Thinkers: Virginia Woolf (4 Credits) In this course we will read Virginia Woolf as a philosopher. We will discuss her philosophy of nature, knowledge, art, politics, science, sensation, gender, and materialism throughout her fiction and non-fiction writings. PHIL 3023 Great Thinkers: Maimonides: Politics, Prophecy and Providence (4 Credits) Using "The Guide for the Perplexed" as our central text, we explore the complex philosophical ideas of Moses Maimonides (1135-1204), one of the central figures in medieval philosophy and Jewish thought. Our study includes analyses of his ideas on principles of faith, human perfection, intellectual vs.
    [Show full text]