DOCSLIB.ORG

15/05/2005 Social Baseline Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
15/05/2005 Social Baseline Data Stage A: Presentation of Baseline Data – As of 31st March 2004 - Additional SA/SEA Indicators KEY: ☺ = Good progress/positive trend/on target. = Mixed progress/unable to determine trend. = Poor progress/negative trend/below target SOCIAL BASELINE DATA Collected Indicator District Quantified Data (figures in Comparators and Targets (figures Trend Issue Identified? Comments/problems/ by? or brackets relate to data sources) in brackets relate to data source) issues for SA Borough Headline Objective: To improve the health of the population overall Will it improve access to high quality, health facilities? SB Proportion of population with access BDC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access FHDC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access IBC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access MSDC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access SEBC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access SCDC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access WDC Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. SB Proportion of population with access Suffolk Can obtain from Graham Mateer (SCC) to hospital or GP or dentist surgery using Accession database in the future (DfT accessibility indicators) but need to define more clearly. Headline Objective: To improve the health of the population overall Will it reduce death rates? SB Overall death rate by all causes BDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Lowest in Suffolk. Decreasing trend since 2001. ☺ Relatively low for Suffolk, and (PCT) 2003: 560.5 decreasing. 2002: 565.1 2001: 582.2 SB Overall death rate by all causes FHDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Highest in Suffolk. Increasing trend since 2001. Increasing age standardised mortality Relatively high for Suffolk, and (PCT) 2003: 674.9 ratio. increasing. 2002: 673.2 2001: 649.8 SB Overall death rate by all causes IBC Age standardised mortality ratio: 2nd highest in Suffolk. Decreased since last year, and lowest Relatively high for Suffolk, but (PCT) 2003: 645.0 since 2001. decreased last year. 2002: 661.8 2001: 650.3 SB Overall death rate by all causes MSDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Increasing trend since 2001. Increasing age standardised mortality Increasing trend, and above (PCT) 2003: 612.9 ratio. average for Suffolk this year. 2002: 585.3 2001: 579.2 SB Overall death rate by all causes SEBC Age standardised mortality ratio: Decreasing trend since 2001. ☺ Decreasing trend, and below (PCT) 2003: 602.5 Last update: 15/05/2005 Collected Indicator District Quantified Data (figures in Comparators and Targets (figures Trend Issue Identified? Comments/problems/ by? or brackets relate to data sources) in brackets relate to data source) issues for SA Borough 2002: 623.3 average for Suffolk this year. Good 2001: 627.1 improvement. SB Overall death rate by all causes SCDC Age standardised mortality ratio: 2nd lowest in Suffolk. Increased this year, but still lower ☺ Relatively low for Suffolk, though (PCT) 2003: 567.7 than 2001. increased this year. 2002: 561.1 2001: 601.2 SB Overall death rate by all causes WDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Variable - decreased last year but this Increasing age standardised mortality Above average for Suffolk, and (PCT) 2003: 640.3 year has almost returned to 2001 ratio last year. has increased this year. 2002: 623.6 figures. 2001: 640.4 SB Overall death rate by all causes Suffolk Age standardised mortality ratio: Increased this year, but still lower Mortality ratio increased this (PCT) 2003: 609.6 than 2001. year, but still lower than 2001. 2002: 608.7 2001: 615.7 Headline Objective: To improve the health of the population overall Will it reduce death rates? SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) BDC Age standardised mortality ratio: 2nd lowest in Suffolk. Increased this year but remained Relatively low for Suffolk. under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 107.6 below 2001 figure. ☺/ (PCT) 2002: 104.2 Increased this year but remained 2001: 111.0 below 2001 figure. Figures fluctuate, so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) FHDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Highest in Suffolk. Decreased this year but still much Monitor whether increase in cancer Relatively high for Suffolk. under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 138.3 higher than 2001 figure. deaths this year represents long term / (PCT) 2002: 144.1 trend. Decreased this year but still much 2001: 84.3 higher than 2001 figure, and significantly higher than other districts. Figures fluctuate, so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) IBC Age standardised mortality ratio: Increasing trend. Monitor whether increase in cancer Around average for Suffolk, under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 117.7 deaths this year represents long term / (PCT) 2002: 113.8 trend. but with an increasing trend. Figures 2001: 113.3 fluctuate, so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) MSDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Increasing trend. Monitor whether increase in cancer Above average for Suffolk under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 119.2 deaths this year represents long term / (PCT) 2002: 111.4 trend. this year, and with an increasing trend. 2001: 98.1 Figures fluctuate, so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) SEBC Age standardised mortality ratio: Increased this year, and now higher Monitor whether increase in cancer Above average for Suffolk under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 118.0 than 2001 figure. deaths this year represents long term / (PCT) 2002: 110.5 trend. this year, and increased. Figures 2001: 116.0 fluctuate, so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) SCDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Lowest in Suffolk. Decreasing trend. Relatively low for Suffolk, under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 112.0 ☺/ (PCT) 2002: 102.4 and with a decreasing trend. Figures 2001: 99.4 fluctuate, so may take longer to Last update: 15/05/2005 Collected Indicator District Quantified Data (figures in Comparators and Targets (figures Trend Issue Identified? Comments/problems/ by? or brackets relate to data sources) in brackets relate to data source) issues for SA Borough determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. WDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Increased this year, but still lower SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) Rate increased this year, but still under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 117.8 than 2001 figure. lower than in 2001. Figures fluctuate, (PCT) 2002: 109.2 so may take longer to determine 2001: 135.2 trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Cancer deaths (malignant neoplasms) Suffolk Age standardised mortality ratio: Increased this year, and now higher Monitor whether increase in cancer Increased this year, and now under 75 per 100,000 population 2003: 114.7 than 2001 figure. deaths this year represents long term / (PCT) 2002: 110.4 trend. higher than in 2001. Figures fluctuate, 2001: 112.7 so may take longer to determine trends. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. Headline Objective: To improve the health of the population overall Will it reduce death rates? SB Heart Disease deaths under 75 per BDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Decreasing trend. ☺ Decreasing trend, and around 100,000 population (PCT) 2003: 43.8 average for Suffolk this year. Consider 2002: 44.0 deleting if not a concern in area. 2001: 46.9 SB Heart Disease deaths under 75 per FHDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Decreasing trend. ☺ Decreasing trend, though above 100,000 population (PCT) 2003: 51.7 average for Suffolk this year. Consider 2002: 55.1 deleting if not a concern in area. 2001: 74.2 SB Heart Disease deaths under 75 per IBC Age standardised mortality ratio: Decreased this year. Last year had highest 100,000 population (PCT) 2003: 47.5 ☺/ 2002: 69.1 mortality rate from heart disease in 2001: 62.9 Suffolk - has fallen this year but still above average for county. Consider deleting if not a concern in area. SB Heart Disease deaths under 75 per MSDC Age standardised mortality ratio: Highest in Suffolk. Only district to Increased this year. Mortality from heart disease is High for Suffolk and only district 100,000 population (PCT) 2003: 52.5 have increased mortality from heart highest in Suffolk, and only district to to have increased mortality from heart 2002: 48.6 disease this year. have increased this year. disease this year. 2001: 48.9 SB Heart Disease deaths under 75 per SEBC Age standardised mortality ratio: 2nd lowest in Suffolk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options
    Sustainability Appraisal of the Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options including Development Control Policies and Strategic Housing Locations also including Appropriate Assessment – screening & scoping December 2008 Suffolk Coastal District Council is grateful to the Research & Intelligence Group, Planning and Performance Improvement, Suffolk County Council, upon whose work this appraisal is based Sustainability Appraisal 1 CONTENTS Page Non-technical summary 4 1.1 Non-technical summary 1.2 Likely significant effects of core strategy policies 1.3 Likely significant effects of development control policies 1.4 Difference the process has made 1.5 How to comment on the report Introduction 6 2. Introduction 2.1 Purpose of the report 2.2 Compliance with SEA directive and regulations 3. Method of appraisal 3.1 Approach to sustainability appraisal 3.2 Who carried out the sustainability appraisal 3.3 Who was consulted, when and how 3.4 Difficulties encountered 4. State of the environment in Suffolk Coastal 4.1 description of baseline characteristics 4.2 Predicted future baseline 4.3 Main issues and problems identified 4.4 Assumptions and limitations on information 5. Sustainability objectives 5.1 Links to other policies, plans and programmes 5.2 The SA framework 5.3 Compatibility of SA and Plan objectives 5.4 Mitigation Core Strategy policies 22 6. Appraisal of core strategy 6.1 Statutory purpose 6.2 Links with national policy & other plans 6.3 Core strategy policies and options 6.4 Significant effects 6.5 Mitigation 6.6 Uncertainties and risks 6.7 Other observations 6.9 Implementation & proposals for monitoring Development Control policies 30 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline
    Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline Lowestoft Ness to Landguard Point SMP2 9S4195/R/PBor Final Report November 2009 Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Suffolk Coastal District Council/Waveney District Council/Environment Agency November 2009 Final Report 9S8393 HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONM ENT Rightwell House Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW United Kingdom +44 (0)1733 334455 Telephone +44 (0)1733 262 243 Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Status Final Report Date November 2009 Project name Suffolk SMP 2 Project number 9S4195 Reference 9S4195/CCR/RKKH/Pboro Drafted by Rosie Kelly & Kit Hawkins Checked by Kit Hawkins Date/initials check KRH 20 / 05 / 2008 Approved by Mat Cork Date/initials approval MC 20 / 05 / 2008 CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF TERMS VI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Structure of Report 1 1.3 Area of Interest 2 2 OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY DESIGNATIONS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Compensation – managed realignment 5 2.2 Ramsar sites 6 2.2.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 6 2.2.2 Broadland 9 2.2.3 Deben Estuary 10 2.2.4 Minsmere-Walberswick 10 2.2.5 Stour and Orwell Estuaries 11 2.3 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) 13 2.3.1 Alde, Ore and Butley Estuaries 16 2.3.2 Benacre to Easton Lagoons 16 2.3.3 The Broads SAC 17 2.3.4 Minsmere – Walberswick Heaths and Marshes 19 2.3.5 Orfordness and Shingle Street 20 2.4 Special Protection Areas (SPAs) 21 2.4.1 Alde-Ore
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Yatural Area: 23. Lincolnshire Marsh and Geological Significance: Notable Coast (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the Lincolnshire Marsh and Coast Natural Area is bminated by Cretaceous chalk (approximately 97-83 Ma) although the later Quaternary deposits (the last 2 Ma) give thc area its overall. charactcr. 'The chalk is only well exposed on thc south bank of the Humber, where quarries and cuttings providc exposures of the Upper Cretaceous Chalk. 'me chalk is a very pure limestone deposited on the floor of a tropical sea. During Quaternary timcs, the area was glaciated on several occasions and as a result the area is covered by a variety of glacial deposits, representing an unknown number of glacial ('lcc Age') and interglacial phases. rhe glacial deposits consist mainly of sands, gravels and clays in variable thicknesses. These are derived primarily from the erosion of surrounding bedrock and therefore tend to have similar lithological characteristics, usually with a high chalk content. The glacial deposits are particularly important because of the controversy surrounding their correlation with the timing and sequence in other parts of England, especially East Anglia. The Quaternary deposits are well exposed in coastal cliffs of the area. Key geological features: Coastal cliffs consisting of glacial sands, gravels and clays Exposures of Cretaceous chalk Number of GCR sites: Oxfordian: 1 Kimmeridgian: I Aptian-Rlbian: i Quaternary of Eastern England: 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ GeologicaVgeomorphological SSSI coverage: 'here are 2 (P)SSSIs in the Natural Area covering 4 GCR SlLs which represent 4 different GCR networks. The site coverage includes South Ferriby Chalk Pit SSSI which contains an important Upper Jurassic succession, overlain by Cretaceous deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • A4 Simple Report 1-Col No Divider Nov 2019
    Issue number: BT-JAC-020631 550-0003-EIA Bramford to Twinstead Scoping Report: Volume 2: Appendices May 2021 Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead i Contents Contents ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information 2 Appendix 2.1 Relevant Environmental Legislation, Policy and Guidance 6 Appendix 2.2 Local Planning Policy 23 Appendix 4.1 Outline Code of Construction Practice 31 Appendix 6.1 Key Characteristics of Landscape Character Assessment 44 Appendix 6.2 Landscape Assessment Methodology 51 Appendix 6.3 Visual Assessment Methodology 72 Appendix 6.4 Wireline and Photomontage Methodology 81 Appendix 6.5 Arboricultural Survey Methodology 87 Appendix 7.1 Biodiversity Supporting Information 91 Appendix 7.2 Ecology Survey Methodology 103 Appendix 7.3 Draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report 128 Appendix 17.1 Major Accidents and Disasters Scoping Table 144 Appendix 18.1 Cumulative Effects Assessment Long List Table 153 National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead iii Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 1 Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information Criteria and Relevant Considerations Result of the Screening Considerations Characteristics of the development: The Bramford to Twinstead project is a proposal to Size of the development consent and build a new c.27km 400kV electricity reinforcement and associated infrastructure between Use of natural resources Bramford in Suffolk and Twinstead in Essex. It includes Production of waste the removal of the existing 132kV overhead line Pollution and nuisances between Burstall Bridge and Twinstead Tee, and a new Risk of accidents substation at Butler’s Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Heath District Council April 2016
    Forest Heath District Council Evidence paper for Single Issue Review (SIR) of Core Strategy Policy CS7 and Site Allocations Local Plan Accessible Natural Greenspace Study April 2016 1 Accessible Natural Greenspace Study 1. Introduction 2. Context and Growth Agenda 3. Planning Policy Context 4. Evidence on Recreation Pressure and mitigation options 5. Developing a Recreation Mitigation Strategy for Forest Heath District 6. Proposed recreation Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy 7. Appendix 1 2 1. Introduction 1.1. This study has been prepared to support Forest Heath District Councils Single Issue Review of Core Strategy Policy CS7 and separate Site Allocations Local Plan. The purpose of the study is to provide evidence on appropriate accessible open space that will support the planned growth in the district. The study is required because there is concern that increased development in the district has the potential to contribute to recreational pressure on Breckland Special Protection Area (SPA) and Breckland Special Area of Conservation (SAC) The SPA and SAC are shown on figure 1 1.2. Natural England, in their response to the Regulation 18 Consultation for the 2015 issues and options documents, remarked in relation to the potential for recreational disturbance: we recommend that, effort is placed into ensuring that each area has an appropriate level of green infrastructure, including sufficient amenity grasslands, improvements in access for walkers and cyclists and facilities for dog walkers. In our view there are areas, such as in Lakenheath for example, that are lacking local green infrastructure. The provision of an appropriate level of green infrastructure within local communities is likely to alleviate pressure on designated sites, as well as supporting the health and wellbeing of residents.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Vatural Area: 33. East Anglian Plain Geological Sigaificance: Outstanding (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the East Anglian Natural Area is mainly underlain by Jpper Cretaceous chalk. This very pure limestone was laid down on the floor of a tropical sea between 97 md 74 Ma. Locally the chalk is rich in fossils including sea-urchins and bivalves. Overlying much of the ;halk is a complex sequence of Quaternary deposits (deposited over the last 2 Ma) showing changes in Aimate and environment from both cold (glacial) and temperate (interglacial) periods. These sediments hostcompletely obscure the underlying chalk and it is their composition which gives the Natural Area its :haacter. The base of the Quaternary sequence is the early Pleistocene Crag deposits which are marine jcdiments of*shelly muds and sands, often containing temperate marinc molluscan faunas. However, the nost extensive and thickest Quaternary sediments consist of glacial sands, gravels and clays deposited by the 4nglian ice sheet as it advanced across the area around 300,000 to 250,000 years BP. These deposits are ;ollectivcly known as 'boulder clay' and their calcareous nature reflects glacial erosion and transportation of he chalk bedrock beneath. The Anglian glaciation interrupted a well-developed fluvial network of eastward flowing rivers, and patches of these preglacial river gravels are still found within the area. Many localitites show river gravels related to the early development of the River Thames, which crossed this area prior to jiversion by the Anglian ice sheet. These sites are important for Quaternary stratigraphy (including records Jf climate change) because they can be correlated with sedirnents in other parts of Britain and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Distribution
    Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 Biodiversity Distribution Biodiversity refers to all of the natural world and all living organisms within it including plants, animals, bacteria and micro organisms. www.waveney.gov.uk/planningpolicy 19 Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 | Biodiversity Distribution www.waveney.gov.uk/planningpolicy 20 Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 | Biodiversity Distribution What is biodiversity? Biodiversity refers to all of the natural world and all living organisms within it, including plants, animals, bacteria and micro organisms. The convention on biodiversity defines it as: “The variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems” (Source: Natural England website). Introduction to the biodiversity distribution assessment Waveney District has a wide range of wildlife and habitats, including coastline, parkland, arable fields, rivers, hedges and woodlands. Many of these are extremely valuable in their own right and require protection and enhancement. These sites often also form part of a wider network of sites and wildlife corridors that increase the range of habitats that can support local wildlife. Networks of biologically valuable sites often have greater value than each of the sites individually. For this reason Waveney District Council wants to map ecological sites and networks to better understand how they can function alongside other types of green infrastructure. The Waveney District Council Biodiversity Audit was completed in 2007 by Suffolk Wildlife Trust. This biodiversity audit included officially designated sites, county wildlife sites and other sites that were considered to have ecological value.
    [Show full text]
  • East Anglia THREE Chapter 4 Site Selection and Alternatives Figures
    East Anglia THREE Chapter 4 Site Selection and Alternatives Figures Environmental Statement Volume 2 Document Reference – 6.2.4 Author – Royal HaskoningDHV East Anglia THREE Limited Date – November 2015 Revision History – Revision A Environmental Statement East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 4 Figures November 2015 610000 615000 620000 625000 630000 635000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 2 F 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 2 Datum: OSGB36 Projection: British National Grid Legend 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 East Anglia THREE Onshore Electrical Transmission Works Parks and gardens 5 3 3 2 2 Ancient woodland Potentially contaminated land Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) RAMSAR Country parks Scheduled monument County wildlife site Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Grassland network Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Local Nature Reserves (LNR) Special Protection Areas (SPA) Lowland heathland Woodland © ESRI 610000 615000 620000 625000 630000 635000 Original A3 0 1 2 km Drg No EA3-L-094 Volume Plot Scale East Anglia THREE Limited 2 26/10/15 AB Second issue 1:75,000 Rev 2 2 1 15/07/15 JE First issue Environmental data © Natural England copyright 2015. Onshore cable route with environmental © Crown Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Date 23/10/2015 Figure Rev Date By Comment Ordnance Survey Licence 0100031673. constraints Layout N/A 4.1 Ref: 610000 615000 620000 625000 630000 635000 29 43 27 40 41 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 F 5 2 17 2 20 18 24 15 37 10 33 15 ID Constraint Name 26 41 0 0 0 1 Stour Estuary (SSSI) 0 0 0 5 5 4 2 Orwell
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Environmental Information Contents
    2B Volume 2B Preliminary Environmental Information Contents 7. Two Village Bypass PEI 8. Northern Park and Ride PEI 9. Southern Park and Ride PEI 10. Freight Management Facility PEI 11. Yoxford Roundabout PEI 12. Highway Improvements PEI 13. Project Wide Cumulative PEI 14. Related Assessments and Approaches References Abbreviations Key Terms Volume 2B Preliminary Environmental Information 7. Two Village Bypass PEI 7.1. Introduction to PEI 7.1.4. The two village bypass would be open to public use alongside construction traffic associated with the project. 7.1.1. The route of the two village bypass would bypass the After completion of the power station, it would be retained villages of Farnham and Stratford St Andrew with a new as a lasting legacy of the project. There would be no single carriageway road to the south (see Volume 1 Figure decommissioning or ‘removal and reinstatement’ phase. 2.12). Once operational, the bypass would form a new section of the A12. 7.1.5. The preferred proposals are likely to have some effects on the environment during construction and 7.1.2. The proposed route runs approximately 2.4 operation. The likely significant adverse and beneficial kilometres (km) across predominantly agricultural land to the effects for the construction and operational phases are south of the existing A12, departing the A12 to the west of explained below. The scope of the preliminary assessment Stratford St Andrew via a new three arm roundabout near includes landscape and visual, terrestrial ecology and Parkgate Farm. It would bend south around Nuttery Belt ornithology, amenity and recreation, geology and soils, and continue around Pond Wood and Foxburrow Wood, land quality and agriculture, terrestrial historic environment, then continue north crossing local roads and a couple of noise and vibration, air quality, groundwater, surface water, Public Rights of Way (PRoWs), before re-joining the A12 flood risk, and traffic and transport and no topics have with a second roundabout to the east of Farnham at the been ‘scoped out’ of the assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline
    Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Suffolk Coastal District Council/Waveney District Council/Environment Agency November 2009 Final Report 9S8393 HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONM ENT Rightwell House Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW United Kingdom +44 (0)1733 334455 Telephone +44 (0)1733 262 243 Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Status Final Report Date November 2009 Project name Suffolk SMP 2 Project number 9S4195 Reference 9S4195/CCR/RKKH/Pboro Drafted by Rosie Kelly & Kit Hawkins Checked by Kit Hawkins Date/initials check KRH 20 / 05 / 2008 Approved by Mat Cork Date/initials approval MC 20 / 05 / 2008 CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF TERMS VI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Structure of Report 1 1.3 Area of Interest 2 2 OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY DESIGNATIONS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Compensation – managed realignment 5 2.2 Ramsar sites 6 2.2.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 6 2.2.2 Broadland 9 2.2.3 Deben Estuary 10 2.2.4 Minsmere-Walberswick 10 2.2.5 Stour and Orwell Estuaries 11 2.3 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) 13 2.3.1 Alde, Ore and Butley Estuaries 16 2.3.2 Benacre to Easton Lagoons 16 2.3.3 The Broads SAC 17 2.3.4 Minsmere – Walberswick Heaths and Marshes 19 2.3.5 Orfordness and Shingle Street 20 2.4 Special Protection Areas (SPAs) 21 2.4.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 23 2.4.2 Benacre to Easton Bavents 24 2.4.3 Broadlands 24 2.4.4 Deben Estuary 25 2.4.5 Minsmere-Walberswick 25 2.4.6 Sandlings
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B3 Scoping Responses and Actions 660961 Appendix B3 Scoping Response and Actions
    Appendix B3 Scoping Responses and Actions 660961 Appendix B3 Scoping Response and Actions Consultees Comments Discipline Response/Action Taken WPC Response An explanation of precisely what land the 161ha covers would be helpful. All This is contained with the ES. There is an AQMA near the Melton Hill/Lime Kiln Quay Rd junction in Woodbridge. See: AQ The AQ assessment has proven a negligible impact upon this AQMA. http://www.eastsuffolk.gov.uk/environment/environmental-protection/air-quality/woodbridge-junctionaqma/ Why would IC (see comment above) monitor pollution concentrations adjacent to the A12, when it is in SCDC’s area? AQ The three detectors within Martlesham Heath were assessed. The impacts at these There are in fact 3 NOx detectors in back gardens backing onto the A12 at the north, middle and south ends of receptors have been minor, with concentrations remaining within allowable Martlesham Heath. tolerance. (Both Heritage Assets Maps, between p26 & p27). The ‘1km’ scale indicators are incorrect, they appear to indicate Above ground The distances marked on the radii are correct. It is not possible to add a scale to roughly 150m (1st map) and 300m (2nd map). heritage promap. (2nd Heritage Assets Map, between p26 & p27) All Saints’ Church, Waldringfield is Grade II* listed, and is about the Above ground Noted, and have included for consistency. same distance from the site as Church of St Mary, Martlesham, so for consistency should be included. heritage Nowhere in this section is there a list of designated sites that would potentially be impacted by the development. Surely Ecology The following sites have been assessed: a scoping document should state which sites need to be assessed for environmental impacts and which do not.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East England: Lowestoft to Dungeness
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 7 South-east England: Lowestoft to Dungeness edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1998 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the Project Steering Group. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance J. Plaza, P.A. Smith, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice comes from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group N. Hailey English Nature Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prof. S.J. Lockwood Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S. Pullen WWF UK (Worldwide Fund for Nature) Dr P.C.
    [Show full text]