DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Subsections of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Subsections of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve ECOLOGICAL SUBSECTIONS OF WRANGELL-ST. ELIAS NATIONAL PARK & PRESERVE Mapping and Delineation by: David K. Swanson Photographs by: Blain Anderson, National Park Service Alaska Region Inventory and Monitoring Program 2525 Gambell Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Alaska Region Inventory & Monitoring Program 2525 Gambell Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 257-2488 Fax (907) 264-5428 Text and maps by David K. Swanson Photographs by Blain Anderson National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Program ECOLOGICAL SUBSECTIONS OF WRANGELL-ST. ELIAS NATIONAL PARK & PRESERVE, ALASKA September, 2001 Contents Contents.......................................................................................................................... ii Introduction..................................................................................................................... 4 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 1 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Alaska Range Region............................................................. 2 JKV Jack Valley Subsection .......................................................................................... 3 MES Mentasta Sedimentary Mountains Subsection ......................................................... 4 NBB Nabesna Basin Subsection .................................................................................... 5 SMM Southern Mentasta Mountains Subsection ............................................................. 7 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Chugach-St. Elias Region ....................................................... 8 BAI Bagley-Seward Icefield Subsection ......................................................................... 8 BRV Bremner Valley Subsection.................................................................................... 9 BSG Bering and Stellar Glaciers Subsection ................................................................. 10 CBM Churchill-Bona Massif Subsection ........................................................................ 10 CHM Chitina Moraines Subsection............................................................................... 11 CLG Chitina and Logan Glaciers Subsection ................................................................. 12 CRC Copper River Canyon Subsection ......................................................................... 14 IBF Icy Bay Foothills Subsection................................................................................. 15 IRG Icefield Ranges and Glaciers Subsection ............................................................... 15 MAG Malaspina Glacier Subsection.............................................................................. 16 MBM Mt. Bear Massif Subsection ................................................................................ 18 MLM Mt. Logan Massif Subsection .............................................................................. 19 NCC Northern Chugach Cirque-Glacier Mountains Subsection........................................ 20 NCF Northern Chugach Foothills Subsection ................................................................ 22 NGR Northern Chugach Glaciers and Ridges Subsection ............................................... 24 NIB Nikolai Butte Subsection...................................................................................... 24 RBM Robinson Mountains Subsection.......................................................................... 25 SSM Southern St. Elias Mountains Subsection.............................................................. 26 SUM Sulzer-Natazhat Mountains Subsection ................................................................ 28 TAV Tana Valley Subsection....................................................................................... 29 UCM University-Centennial Mountains Subsection ........................................................ 30 WBR Waxel-Barkley Ridge Subsection......................................................................... 31 WHM White-Hawkins Massif Subsection ...................................................................... 32 WSF Western St. Elias Foothills Subsection.................................................................. 32 YGG Yahtse and Guyot Glaciers Subsection ................................................................. 33 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Copper River Basin Region ................................................... 34 ALP Ahtna Lacustrine Plain Subsection........................................................................ 34 CVF Chitina Valley Floodplains and Terraces Subsection ............................................... 36 ii DLP Duck Lake Plain Subsection................................................................................. 40 KHT Kotsina-Kuskalana Hills and Terraces Subsection .................................................. 41 MCF Middle Copper River Floodplain and Terraces Subsection....................................... 42 NAP Natat Plain Subsection........................................................................................ 43 TAM Tanada Moraine Subsection................................................................................ 44 UCO Upper Copper River Floodplains and Terraces Subsection...................................... 45 WMT Wrangell Mountains Toeslope Subsection ........................................................... 46 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Gulf of Alaska Coast Region ................................................. 48 MAF Malaspina Foreland Subsection ........................................................................... 48 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Kluane Range Region .......................................................... 50 CHB Chisana Basin Subsection ................................................................................... 50 NIM Nutzotin Igneous Mountains Subsection............................................................... 51 NSM Nutzotin Sedimentary Mountains Subsection........................................................ 52 SBV Solo-Beaver Valley Subsection............................................................................. 54 SNH Southern Nutzotin Hills and Mountains Subsection................................................ 56 WRB White River Basin Subsection ............................................................................. 57 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Tanana-Kuskokwim Lowlands Region.................................... 60 JAF Jatahmund Basin Floodplains and Terraces Subsection........................................... 60 JAM Jatahmund Basin Moraines Subsection................................................................. 63 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Wrangell Mountains Region.................................................. 65 BDM Baldwin Mountains Subsection............................................................................ 65 CHP Cheshnina Plateaus and Valleys Subsection.......................................................... 66 CSR Cross Range Subsection ..................................................................................... 68 DSF Drum-Sanford Footslopes Subsection................................................................... 69 JLP Jacksina Lava Plateau Subsection ......................................................................... 71 JVR Jarvis Range Subsection...................................................................................... 72 MCM McCarthy Mountains Subsection ......................................................................... 73 MTD Mt. Drum Subsection ......................................................................................... 76 MTS Mt. Sanford Subsection ...................................................................................... 77 MWM Mt. Wrangell Mountainside Subsection............................................................... 78 NAM Nabesna Mountains Subsection .......................................................................... 79 RER Regal Range Subsection ..................................................................................... 80 TNM Tanada Mountains Subsection ............................................................................ 81 WRI Wrangell Icecap Subsection................................................................................ 82 Ecological Unit Descriptions – Yukon-Tanana Uplands Region............................................. 83 CAH Carden Hills Subsection ...................................................................................... 83 SBP Snag-Beaver Creek Plain Subsection .................................................................... 84 WEM Wellesley Mountains Subsection......................................................................... 86 References..................................................................................................................... 87 Table 1. National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units* ....................................... 91 Table 2: Index to the Ecological Units of the Alaska Range Ecoregion of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve .......................................................................................... 91 Table 3: Index to the Ecological Units of the Chugach-St. Elias Ecoregion of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTES on the BIRDS of CHIRIKOF ISLAND, ALASKA Jack J
    NOTES ON THE BIRDS OF CHIRIKOF ISLAND, ALASKA JACK J. WITHROW, University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Isolated in the western Gulf of Alaska 61 km from nearest land and 74 km southwest of the Kodiak archipelago, Chirikof Island has never seen a focused investigation of its avifauna. Annotated status and abundance for 89 species recorded during eight visits 2008–2014 presented here include eastern range extensions for three Beringian subspecies of the Pacific Wren (Troglodytes pacificus semidiensis), Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia sanaka), and Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch (Leucost- icte tephrocotis griseonucha). A paucity of breeding bird species is thought to be a result of the long history of the presence of introduced cattle and introduced foxes (Vulpes lagopus), both of which persist to this day. Unique among sizable islands in southwestern Alaska, Chirikof Island (55° 50′ N 155° 37′ W) has escaped focused investigations of its avifauna, owing to its geographic isolation, lack of an all-weather anchorage, and absence of major seabird colonies. In contrast, nearly every other sizable island or group of islands in this region has been visited by biologists, and they or their data have added to the published literature on birds: the Aleutian Is- lands (Gibson and Byrd 2007), the Kodiak archipelago (Friedmann 1935), the Shumagin Islands (Bailey 1978), the Semidi Islands (Hatch and Hatch 1983a), the Sandman Reefs (Bailey and Faust 1980), and other, smaller islands off the Alaska Peninsula (Murie 1959, Bailey and Faust 1981, 1984). With the exception of most of the Kodiak archipelago these islands form part of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge (AMNWR), and many of these publications are focused largely on seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D
    ARCTIC VOL. 54, NO. 2 (JUNE 2001) P. 157– 161 Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D. ROBINSON1 (Received 30 May 2000; accepted in revised form 25 September 2000) ABSTRACT. Peatlands are a particularly good medium for trapping and preserving tephra, as their surfaces are wet and well vegetated. The extent of tephra-depositing events can often be greatly expanded through the observation of ash in peatlands. This paper uses the presence of the White River tephra layer (1200 B.P.) in peatlands to extend the known distribution of this late Holocene tephra into the Mackenzie Valley, northwestern Canada. The ash has been noted almost to the western shore of Great Slave Lake, over 1300 km from the source in southeastern Alaska. This new distribution covers approximately 540000 km2 with a tephra volume of 27 km3. The short time span and constrained timing of volcanic ash deposition, combined with unique physical and chemical parameters, make tephra layers ideal for use as chronostratigraphic markers. Key words: chronostratigraphy, Mackenzie Valley, peatlands, White River ash RÉSUMÉ. Les tourbières constituent un milieu particulièrement approprié au piégeage et à la conservation de téphra, en raison de l’humidité et de l’abondance de végétation qui règnent en surface. L’observation des cendres contenues dans les tourbières permet souvent d’élargir notablement les limites spatiales connues des épisodes de dépôts de téphra. Cet article recourt à la présence de la couche de téphra de la rivière White (1200 BP) dans les tourbières pour agrandir la distribution connue de ce téphra datant de l’Holocène supérieur dans la vallée du Mackenzie, située dans le Nord-Ouest canadien.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)
    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St-Elias National Park and Preserve and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve
    Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St-Elias National Park and Preserve and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve Pamela J. Sousanes Denali National Park and Preserve P.O. Box 9 Denali Park, AK 99755 2005 Central Alaska Network NPS Report Series Number: NPS/AKCAKN/NRTR-2006/0xx Project Number: CAKN-xxxxxx Funding Source: Central Alaska Network Denali National Park and Preserve Draft 2005 Annual Climate Monitoring Report – March 2006 Central Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network File Name: Sousanes_P_2006_ClimateMonitoringCAKN_0315.doc Recommended Citation: Sousanes, Pamela J. 2006. Annual Climate Monitoring Report for Denali National Park and Preserve, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, and Yukon- Charley Rivers National Preserve. NPS/AKCAKN/NRTR-2006/xx. National Park Service. Denali Park, AK. 75 pg. Acronyms: I&M Inventory and Monitoring CAKN Central Alaska Network DENA Denali National Park and Preserve WRST Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve YUCH Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve NPS National Park Service WRCC Western Regional Climate Center NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWS National Weather Service RAWS Remote Automated Weather Station NCDC National Climatic Data Center AWOS Automated Weather Observation Station SNOTEL Snow Telemetry ii Draft 2005 Annual Climate Monitoring Report – March 2006 Central Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 January Scree
    the SCREE Mountaineering Club of Alaska January 2020 Volume 63, Number 1 Contents Mount Anno Domini Peak 2330 and Far Out Peak Devils Paw North Taku Tower Randoism via Rosie’s Roost "The greatest danger for Berlin Wall most of us is not that our aim is too high and we Katmai and the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes miss it, but that it is too Peak of the Month: Old Snowy low and we reach it." – Michelangelo JANUARY MEETING: Wednesday, January 8, at 6:30 p.m. Luc Mehl will give the presentation. The Mountaineering Club of Alaska www.mtnclubak.org "To maintain, promote, and perpetuate the association of persons who are interested in promoting, sponsoring, im- proving, stimulating, and contributing to the exercise of skill and safety in the Art and Science of Mountaineering." This issue brought to you by: Editor—Steve Gruhn assisted by Dawn Munroe Hut Needs and Notes Cover Photo If you are headed to one of the MCA huts, please consult the Hut Gabe Hayden high on Devils Paw. Inventory and Needs on the website (http://www.mtnclubak.org/ Photo by Brette Harrington index.cfm/Huts/Hut-Inventory-and-Needs) or Greg Bragiel, MCA Huts Committee Chairman, at either [email protected] or (907) 350-5146 to see what needs to be taken to the huts or repaired. All JANUARY MEETING huts have tools and materials so that anyone can make basic re- Wednesday, January 8, at 6:30 p.m. at the BP Energy Center at pairs. Hutmeisters are needed for each hut: If you have a favorite 1014 Energy Court in Anchorage.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Tephrochronology of the Mt
    Quaternary Research 73 (2010) 277–292 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Marine tephrochronology of the Mt. Edgecumbe Volcanic Field, Southeast Alaska, USA Jason A. Addison a,b,⁎, James E. Beget a,b, Thomas A. Ager c, Bruce P. Finney d a Alaska Quaternary Center and Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 900 Yukon Drive, PO Box 755780, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5780, USA b Alaska Quaternary Center, PO Box 755940, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5940, USA c U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 980, Box 25045, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209-8007, USA article info abstract Article history: The Mt. Edgecumbe Volcanic Field (MEVF), located on Kruzof Island near Sitka Sound in southeast Alaska, Received 30 March 2009 experienced a large multiple-stage eruption during the last glacial maximum (LGM)–Holocene transition Available online 11 December 2009 that generated a regionally extensive series of compositionally similar rhyolite tephra horizons and a single well-dated dacite (MEd) tephra. Marine sediment cores collected from adjacent basins to the MEVF contain Keywords: both tephra-fall and pyroclastic flow deposits that consist primarily of rhyolitic tephra and a minor dacitic Tephra tephra unit. The recovered dacite tephra correlates with the MEd tephra, whereas many of the rhyolitic Alaska North Pacific Ocean tephras correlate with published MEVF rhyolites. Correlations were based on age constraints and major Cryptotephra oxide compositions of glass shards. In addition to LGM–Holocene macroscopic tephra units, four marine Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Notes
    268 NORTH AMERICAN NOTES NORTH AMERICAN NOTES BY KENNETH A. HENDERSON HE year I 967 marked the Centennial celebration of the purchase of Alaska from Russia by the United States and the Centenary of the Articles of Confederation which formed the Canadian provinces into the Dominion of Canada. Thus both Alaska and Canada were in a mood to celebrate, and a part of this celebration was expressed · in an extremely active climbing season both in Alaska and the Yukon, where some of the highest mountains on the continent are located. While much of the officially sponsored mountaineering activity was concentrated in the border mountains between Alaska and the Yukon, there was intense activity all over Alaska as well. More information is now available on the first winter ascent of Mount McKinley mentioned in A.J. 72. 329. The team of eight was inter­ national in scope, a Frenchman, Swiss, German, Japanese, and New Zealander, the rest Americans. The successful group of three reached the summit on February 28 in typical Alaskan weather, -62° F. and winds of 35-40 knots. On their return they were stormbound at Denali Pass camp, I7,3oo ft. for seven days. For the forty days they were on the mountain temperatures averaged -35° to -40° F. (A.A.J. I6. 2I.) One of the most important attacks on McKinley in the summer of I967 was probably the three-pronged assault on the South face by the three parties under the general direction of Boyd Everett (A.A.J. I6. IO). The fourteen men flew in to the South east fork of the Kahiltna glacier on June 22 and split into three groups for the climbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Denali
    Central Alaska Network Geologic Resources Evaluation Scoping Meeting Summary A geologic resources evaluation (GRE) scoping meeting was held from February 24 through 26, 2004 at the NPS regional office in Anchorage, Alaska to discuss geologic mapping in and around the parks and geologic resources management issues and concerns. The scoping meeting covered the three parks in the Central Alaska Network (CAKN) – Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve (WRST), Denali National Park and Preserve (DENA), and Yukon Charley Rivers National Preserve (YUCH). A summary of the status of geologic mapping and resource management issues is presented separately for each of these parks. The scoping summary is supplemented with additional geologic information from park planning documents, websites and NPS Geologic Resources Division documents. Purpose of the Geologic Resources Evaluation Program Geologic resources serve as the foundation of the park ecosystems and yield important information needed for park decision making. The National Park Service Natural Resource Challenge, an action plan to advance the management and protection of park resources, has focused efforts to inventory the natural resources of parks. The geologic component is carried out by the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program administered by the NPS Geologic Resource Division. The goal of the GRE Program is to provide each of the identified 274 “Natural Area” parks with a digital geologic map, a geologic evaluation report, and a geologic bibliography. Each product is a tool to support the stewardship of park resources and each is designed to be user friendly to non-geoscientists. The GRE teams hold scoping meetings at parks to review available data on the geology of a particular park and to discuss the geologic issues in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • P1616 Text-Only PDF File
    A Geologic Guide to Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska A Tectonic Collage of Northbound Terranes By Gary R. Winkler1 With contributions by Edward M. MacKevett, Jr.,2 George Plafker,3 Donald H. Richter,4 Danny S. Rosenkrans,5 and Henry R. Schmoll1 Introduction region—his explorations of Malaspina Glacier and Mt. St. Elias—characterized the vast mountains and glaciers whose realms he invaded with a sense of astonishment. His descrip­ Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve (fig. tions are filled with superlatives. In the ensuing 100+ years, 6), the largest unit in the U.S. National Park System, earth scientists have learned much more about the geologic encompasses nearly 13.2 million acres of geological won­ evolution of the parklands, but the possibility of astonishment derments. Furthermore, its geologic makeup is shared with still is with us as we unravel the results of continuing tectonic contiguous Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, Kluane processes along the south-central Alaska continental margin. National Park and Game Sanctuary in the Yukon Territory, the Russell’s superlatives are justified: Wrangell–Saint Elias Alsek-Tatshenshini Provincial Park in British Columbia, the is, indeed, an awesome collage of geologic terranes. Most Cordova district of Chugach National Forest and the Yakutat wonderful has been the continuing discovery that the disparate district of Tongass National Forest, and Glacier Bay National terranes are, like us, invaders of a sort with unique trajectories Park and Preserve at the north end of Alaska’s panhan­ and timelines marking their northward journeys to arrive in dle—shared landscapes of awesome dimensions and classic today’s parklands.
    [Show full text]
  • Insar Observations of the 1993-95 Bering Glacier (Alaska, U. S. A
    Journal ofGlaciology, Vo l. 48, No.162,2002 InSAR observations of the 1993^95 Bering Glacier (Alaska, U.S.A.)surge and a surge hypothesis Dennis R. FATLAND,1 Craig S. LINGLE2 1Vexcel Corporation, Boulder,Colorado 80301-3242, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Geophysical Institute, University ofAlaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7320, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. Time-varying accelerations were observed on Bagley Icefield during the 1993^95 surge of Bering Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A., using repeat-pass synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Observations were from datasets acquired during winter 1991/92 (pre-surge), winter 1993/94 (during the surge) and winter 1995/96 (post-surge).The surge is shown to have extended 110km up the icefield from Bering Glacier to within 15km or less of the flow divide. Acceleration and step-like velocity profiles are strongly associated with an along-glacier series of central phase bull's-eyes with diameters of 0.5^4 km.These bull's-eyes are interpreted to represent glacier surface rise/fall events of 3^30 cm during 1^3 day observation intervals and indicate possible migrating pockets of subglacial water. We present a surge hypothesis that relates late-summer climate to englacial water storage and thence to the subglacial water dynamics ö pressurization, hydraulic jacking, depres- surization and migration ö suggested by our observations. INTRODUCTION with floods of sediment-laden water at the glacier terminus onVariegated and West Fork Glaciers, Alaska (Harrison and Bering Glacier, together with Bagley Icefield, its associated others, 1986, 1994). This work demonstrated that large-scale accumulation area, and smaller tributaries, covers an area of 2 disruption of the basal drainage system results in large 5200 km in the Chugach^Saint Elias Mountains of south- volumes of subglacially stored water and bed separation central Alaska, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska
    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]