DOCSLIB.ORG

Circulating Steroid Hormone Variations Throughout Different Stages of Prostate Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Circulating Steroid Hormone Variations Throughout Different Stages of Prostate Cancer 2411 G Snaterse et al. Circulating steroids in prostate 24:11 R403–R420 Review cancer Circulating steroid hormone variations throughout different stages of prostate cancer Gido Snaterse1, Jenny A Visser1, Wiebke Arlt2 and Johannes Hofland1,2 Correspondence should be addressed 1 Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands to J Hofland 2 Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Email [email protected] Abstract Steroid hormones play a central role in the maintenance and progression of prostate Key Words cancer. The androgen receptor is the primary driver of tumor cell proliferation and f androgens is activated by the androgens testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone. Inhibition of f prostate cancer this pathway through medical or surgical castration improves survival in the majority f circulating markers of advanced prostate cancer patients. However, conversion of adrenal androgen precursors and alternative steroidogenic pathways have been found to contribute to tumor progression and resistance to treatment. The emergence of highly accurate detection methods allows us to study steroidogenic mechanisms in more detail, even after treatment with potent steroidogenic inhibitors such as the CYP17A1 inhibitor abiraterone. A clear overview of steroid hormone levels in patients throughout the local, Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related metastatic and castration-resistant stages of prostate cancer and treatment modalities is key toward a better understanding of their role in tumor progression and treatment resistance. In this review, we summarize the currently available data on steroid hormones that have been implicated in the various stages of prostate cancer. Additionally, this review addresses the implications of these findings, highlights important studies in this Endocrine-Related Cancer field and identifies current gaps in literature. (2017) 24, R403–R420 Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most prevalent form of treated with curative intent by prostatectomy or localized cancer, with the exception of non-melanoma skin radiotherapy (Attard et al. 2016). Active surveillance may cancers, in men in Western countries with an estimated be employed in some cases if immediate treatment is not 677.473 new cases in Europe and North America in deemed necessary or beneficial, for example in patients 2014 (Forman & Ferlay 2014). In addition, it is a major with low risk (Klotz & Emberton 2014, Hamdy et al. 2016). contributor to cancer-related mortality in these regions Metastatic prostate cancer is very difficult to treat due to with an estimated 126.430 prostate cancer-related deaths, its tendency to metastasize to the bone (Ye et al. 2007). ranking third in men after lung and colorectal cancers As such, only palliative treatment options exist. (Forman & Ferlay 2014). PC presents relatively late in The androgen receptor (AR) is the main driver of life, after a median of 68 years and is often discovered prostate cancer proliferation and is primarily activated during routine examinations or upon examination of by the androgenic steroid hormones testosterone and urogenital discomfort. Early stage, localized PC can be 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Androgens are derived http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-17-0155 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/28/2021 11:25:27PM via free access 10.1530/ERC-17-0155 Review G Snaterse et al. Circulating steroids in prostate 24:11 R404 cancer from cholesterol in a multi-step process (Fig. 1) that is converted by 5α-reductase (SRD5A1 and 2) into DHT, primarily involves the testes, although androgens which has higher affinity and improved retention at the precursors are also secreted from the zona reticularis of the AR compared to testosterone (Askew et al. 2007). Upon adrenal cortex. In the prostate, circulating testosterone activation, the AR dissociates from its chaperone heat Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related Figure 1 Overview of steroidogenesis leading to the production of androgens, estrogens, mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. The classical pathway produces DHT through conversion of DHEA, androstenedione and testosterone. The backdoor pathway of DHT synthesis completely bypasses canonical androgen synthesis and instead involves 5α-reduced conversion products ultimately leading to the production of androsterone or androstanediol as precursors for DHT. An alternative pathway produces DHT with androstanedione as intermediary rather than testosterone. Black arrows depict conversions steps with the responsible enzymes listed in red. The 11-oxygenated androgen synthesis pathway is listed, starting with the conversion of androstenedione to 11-hydroxy-androstenedione. DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate; DHT, 5α-dihydrotestosterone; DOC, deoxycorticosterone. http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-17-0155 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/28/2021 11:25:27PM via free access Review G Snaterse et al. Circulating steroids in prostate 24:11 R405 cancer shock protein 90 (HSP90) and translocates to the nucleus flutamide and biculatamide, it shows less agonistic where it acts as a transcription factor (Trepel et al. 2010). properties in AR-mutated or AR-overexpressing settings The AR subsequently drives the expression of oncogenes (Tran et al. 2009, Korpal et al. 2013), which is critical as causing proliferation of PC cells. one of the mechanisms sustaining PC growth is through Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) through medical continuously evolving AR mutations in the cancer cells. castration with or without anti-androgens is the mainstay The clinical benefits shown in phase III randomized clinical therapy for advanced prostate cancer (Perlmutter & Lepor trials with enzalutamide and abiraterone suggest that AR 2007). First-line ADT typically consists of treatment with activation is still an essential component of CRPC growth gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or and progression, both before as well as after docetaxel antagonists reducing the secretion of luteinizing hormone chemotherapy (de Bono et al. 2011, Scher et al. 2012, Ryan (LH) and consequently preventing the production of et al. 2013b, Beer et al. 2014). Continued expression of testosterone in testicular Leydig cells. GnRH agonists AR-regulated genes such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) initially cause an LH surge followed by downregulation during second-line anti-androgen axis treatment supports of the GnRH receptor and sustained suppression of LH this hypothesis (Conteduca et al. 2016). levels, while GnRH antagonists cause an immediate Several mechanisms for continued AR activation in the reduction of LH secretion. This treatment improves presence of low circulating levels of androgenic steroids survival in most men, but resistance to treatment typically have been proposed. Key observations have come from occurs within 2–3 years. This next stage of the disease is studies looking at continued relevance of the AR (Chen termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and is et al. 2004a) and residual androgen presence in PC tissues accompanied by a poor overall survival of 16–18 months (Mohler et al. 2004). Conversion of circulating adrenal on average (Harris et al. 2009). androgens androstenedione, DHEA and its sulfated form CRPC can be treated with docetaxel chemotherapy (DHEAS) into testosterone and DHT through elevation of (Tannock et al. 2004), the second-line anti-androgen axis 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) has been shown drugs abiraterone and enzalutamide, but resistance to to occur in CRPC (Stanbrough et al. 2006, Hofland et al. these drugs typically occurs within 6–18 months (Ryan 2010, Kumagai et al. 2013). It has been suggested that, in et al. 2013b, Beer et al. 2014). Compared to first-line the absence of testis-derived testosterone, expression of ADT, abiraterone causes a more complete suppression of steroidogenic enzymes may allow tumor cells to generate androgen synthesis by inhibiting cytochrome P450 (CYP) androgens themselves (Locke et al. 2008, Montgomery Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related 17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1), a protein that et al. 2008, Ishizaki et al. 2013). However, in what way catalyzes key steps in the production of androgens (Fig. 1). de novo synthesis of androgens contributes to the CRPC As a result, the production of the androgen precursors resistance phenotype in the clinical setting has not yet dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and androstenedione been determined. and subsequently that of potent androgens is inhibited. Alternatively, additional DHT synthesis pathways Hence, abiraterone also suppresses adrenal androgen have been proposed that completely bypass the classic precursor synthesis, while first-line ADT only suppresses androgen synthesis pathway via testosterone (Fig. 1). gonadal androgen synthesis. Abiraterone has to be Other mechanisms involved in resistance to castration co-administered with glucocorticoids as CYP17A1 include AR ligand promiscuity due to mutations, inhibition results in enhanced ACTH-stimulation of allowing the AR to become activated by a variety of the adrenal, which, in combination with the CYP17A1 steroid hormones (Duff & McEwan 2005). As such, block, causes significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DHEA | Medchemexpress
    Inhibitors Product Data Sheet DHEA • Agonists Cat. No.: HY-14650 CAS No.: 53-43-0 Molecular Formula: C₁₉H₂₈O₂ • Molecular Weight: 288.42 Screening Libraries Target: Androgen Receptor; Endogenous Metabolite Pathway: Others; Metabolic Enzyme/Protease Storage: Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis. SOLVENT & SOLUBILITY In Vitro DMSO : 50 mg/mL (173.36 mM; Need ultrasonic) Ethanol : 50 mg/mL (173.36 mM; Need ultrasonic) H2O : 1 mg/mL (3.47 mM; Need ultrasonic) Mass Solvent 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg Concentration Preparing 1 mM 3.4672 mL 17.3358 mL 34.6717 mL Stock Solutions 5 mM 0.6934 mL 3.4672 mL 6.9343 mL 10 mM 0.3467 mL 1.7336 mL 3.4672 mL Please refer to the solubility information to select the appropriate solvent. In Vivo 1. Add each solvent one by one: Cremophor EL Solubility: 14.29 mg/mL (49.55 mM); Clear solution; Need ultrasonic 2. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 40% PEG300 >> 5% Tween-80 >> 45% saline Solubility: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (8.67 mM); Clear solution 3. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in saline) Solubility: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (8.67 mM); Clear solution 4. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% corn oil Solubility: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (8.67 mM); Clear solution 5. Add each solvent one by one: 10% EtOH >> 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in saline) Solubility: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (8.67 mM); Clear solution 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of Zebrafish 17Beta-HSD Type 1 and Type 3: a Comparative Analysis of Androgen/Estrogen Activity Regulators
    Institut für Experimentelle Genetik GSF-Forschungzentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Neuherberg Identification and characterization of zebrafish 17beta-HSD type 1 and type 3: A comparative analysis of androgen/estrogen activity regulators Rebekka Mindnich Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.- Prof. Dr. Bertold Hock Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jerzy Adamski 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Johannes Buchner 3. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Wurst Die Dissertation wurde am 30.06.2004 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 07.10. 2004 angenommen. Table of contents Table of contents ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................... 7 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG................................................................................................................ 9 ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................... 11 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 THE AIM OF THIS STUDY ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Us Anti-Doping Agency
    2019U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WALLET CARDEXAMPLES OF PROHIBITED AND PERMITTED SUBSTANCES AND METHODS Effective Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2019 CATEGORIES OF SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) • Non-Approved Substances: investigational drugs and pharmaceuticals with no approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use. • Anabolic Agents: androstenediol, androstenedione, bolasterone, boldenone, clenbuterol, danazol, desoxymethyltestosterone (madol), dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA , Intrarosa) and its prohormones, drostanolone, epitestosterone, methasterone, methyl-1-testosterone, methyltestosterone (Covaryx, EEMT, Est Estrogens-methyltest DS, Methitest), nandrolone, oxandrolone, prostanozol, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (enobosarm, (ostarine, MK-2866), andarine, LGD-4033, RAD-140). stanozolol, testosterone and its metabolites or isomers (Androgel), THG, tibolone, trenbolone, zeranol, zilpaterol, and similar substances. • Beta-2 Agonists: All selective and non-selective beta-2 agonists, including all optical isomers, are prohibited. Most inhaled beta-2 agonists are prohibited, including arformoterol (Brovana), fenoterol, higenamine (norcoclaurine, Tinospora crispa), indacaterol (Arcapta), levalbuterol (Xopenex), metaproternol (Alupent), orciprenaline, olodaterol (Striverdi), pirbuterol (Maxair), terbutaline (Brethaire), vilanterol (Breo). The only exceptions are albuterol, formoterol, and salmeterol by a metered-dose inhaler when used
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 3.1 Interactions of Xenobiotics with the Steroid Hormone Biosynthesis Pathway*
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 75, Nos. 11–12, pp. 1957–1971, 2003. © 2003 IUPAC Topic 3.1 Interactions of xenobiotics with the steroid hormone biosynthesis pathway* Thomas Sanderson‡ and Martin van den Berg Institute for Risk Assessment Science, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 8017, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands Abstract: Environmental contaminants can potentially disrupt endocrine processes by inter- fering with the function of enzymes involved in steroid synthesis and metabolism. Such in- terferences may result in reproductive problems, cancers, and toxicities related to (sexual) differentiation, growth, and development. Various known or suspected endocrine disruptors interfere with steroidogenic enzymes. Particular attention has been given to aromatase, the enzyme responsible for the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Studies of the potential for xenobiotics to interfere with steroidogenic enzymes have often involved microsomal frac- tions of steroidogenic tissues from animals exposed in vivo, or in vitro exposures of steroid- ogenic cells in primary culture. Increasingly, immortalized cell lines, such as the H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line are used in the screening of effects of chemicals on steroid synthesis and metabolism. Such bioassay systems are expected to play an increasingly important role in the screening of complex environmental mixtures and individual contami- nants for potential interference with steroidogenic enzymes. However, given the complexities in the steroid synthesis pathways and the biological activities of the hormones, together with the unknown biokinetic properties of these complex mixtures, extrapolation of in vitro effects to in vivo toxicities will not be straightforward and will require further, often in vivo, inves- tigations. INTRODUCTION There is increasing evidence that certain environmental contaminants have the potential to disrupt en- docrine processes, which may result in reproductive problems, certain cancers, and other toxicities re- lated to (sexual) differentiation, growth, and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Aminoglutethimide on A5-Androstenediol Metabolism in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 42, 4797-4800, November 1982] 0008-5472/82/0042-0000802.00 Effects of Aminoglutethimide on A5-Androstenediol Metabolism in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer1 Charles E. Bird,2 Valerie Masters, Ernest E. Sterns, and Albert F. Clark Departments of Medicine [C. E. B., V. M.], Surgery [E. E. S.J, and Biochemistry [A. F. C.], Queen s University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 2V7 ABSTRACT women. More recently, we (8) and others (18) reported that the production of A5-androstene-3/8,17/8-diol in normal post- A5-Androstene-3/8,1 7/S-diol has potential estrogenic activity menopausal women is approximately 500 to 700 fig/24 hr. because it is known to bind to receptors and translocate to the AG, in combination with hydrocortisone, has been utilized to nucleus of certain estrogen target tissues. Its role in the biology inhibit estrogen production in patients with breast cancer (21 ). of breast cancer is unclear. Aminoglutethimide plus hydrocor This form of therapy has been termed "medical adrenalec tisone ("medical adrenalectomy") has been used to treat post- tomy," and studies suggest that it is as effective as surgical menopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. adrenalectomy. The hydrocortisone shuts off the basal adre- We studied A5-androstene-3/3,17/?-diol metabolism in post- nocortical production of estrogen precursors; AG not only menopausal women with breast cancer before and during slows down steroid biosynthesis at an early step but also aminoglutethimide-plus-hydrocortisone therapy, utilizing the specifically inhibits the aromatization of A4-androstenedione to constant infusion technique.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/190970 Al 18 October 2018 (18.10.2018) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/190970 Al 18 October 2018 (18.10.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, CI2Q 1/32 (2006.01) UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, (21) International Application Number: EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, PCT/US2018/021 109 MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, (22) International Filing Date: TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, 06 March 2018 (06.03.2018) KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). (25) Filing Language: English Declarations under Rule 4.17: (26) Publication Langi English — as to applicant's entitlement to apply for and be granted a patent (Rule 4.1 7(H)) (30) Priority Data: — as to the applicant's entitlement to claim the priority of the 62/484,141 11 April 2017 ( 11.04.2017) US earlier application (Rule 4.17(Hi)) (71) Applicant: REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, Published: INC. [US/US]; 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, — with international search report (Art. 21(3)) New York 10591-6707 (US). — with sequence listing part of description (Rule 5.2(a)) (72) Inventors: STEVIS, Panayiotis; 777 Old Saw Mill Riv er Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591-6707 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) As an Early Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) as an Early Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Xianqin Qu 1,* and Richard Donnelly 2 1 School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia 2 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-95147852 Received: 1 October 2020; Accepted: 28 October 2020; Published: 1 November 2020 Abstract: Human sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is a glycoprotein produced by the liver that binds sex steroids with high affinity and specificity. Clinical observations and reports in the literature have suggested a negative correlation between circulating SHBG levels and markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and insulin resistance. Decreased SHBG levels increase the bioavailability of androgens, which in turn leads to progression of ovarian pathology, anovulation and the phenotypic characteristics of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). This review will use a case report to illustrate the inter-relationships between SHBG, NAFLD and PCOS. In particular, we will review the evidence that low hepatic SHBG production may be a key step in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that serum SHBG levels may be useful as a diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for managing women with PCOS. Keywords: adolescents; hepatic lipogenesis; human sex hormone-binding globulin; insulin resistance; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; polycystic ovary syndrome 1. Introduction Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex, common reproductive and endocrine disorder affecting up to 10% of reproductive-aged women [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Therapies Targeted to Androgen Receptor Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer: Progress, Challenges, and Hope
    cancers Review Therapies Targeted to Androgen Receptor Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer: Progress, Challenges, and Hope Sirin Saranyutanon 1,2, Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava 1,2,*, Sachin Pai 3, Seema Singh 1,2,4 and Ajay Pratap Singh 1,2,4,* 1 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36617, USA; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (S.S.) 2 Department of Oncologic Sciences, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36604, USA 3 Department of Medical Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36604, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.K.S.); [email protected] (A.P.S.); Tel.: +1-251-445-9874 (S.K.S.); +1-251-445-9843 (A.P.S.) Received: 4 November 2019; Accepted: 18 December 2019; Published: 23 December 2019 Abstract: Prostate cancer is the mostly commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death affecting men in the United States. Moreover, it disproportionately affects the men of African origin, who exhibit significantly greater incidence and mortality as compared to the men of European origin. Since androgens play an important role in the growth of normal prostate and prostate tumors, targeting of androgen signaling has remained a mainstay for the treatment of aggressive prostate cancer. Over the years, multiple approaches have been evaluated to effectively target the androgen signaling pathway that include direct targeting of the androgens, androgen receptor (AR), AR co-regulators or other alternate mechanisms that impact the outcome of androgen signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Altered Steroid Milieu in AI Resistant Breast Cancer Facilitates AR Mediated Gene Expression Associated with Poor
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 9, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0791 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. 1 Altered steroid milieu in AI resistant breast cancer facilitates AR mediated gene expression associated with poor 2 response to therapy. 3 Short title: Androstenedione drives AR mediated gene expression in AI resistance. 4 Laura Creevey1* ([email protected]) 5 Rachel Bleach1* ([email protected]) 6 Stephen F Madden2 ([email protected]) 7 Sinead Toomey3 ([email protected]) 8 Fiona T Bane1 ([email protected]) 9 Damir Varešlija 1 ([email protected]) 10 Arnold D Hill4 ([email protected]) 11 Leonie S Young1 ([email protected]) 12 ‡Marie McIlroy1 ([email protected]) 13 1. Endocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, RCSI, Dublin 2 14 2. Data Science Centre, RCSI, Dublin 2 15 3. Department of Oncology, RCSI, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9 16 4. Department of Surgery, RCSI, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9 17 * Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript 18 The authors declare there have been no competing interests. 19 ‡Corresponding author: M. McIlroy ([email protected]) 20 Endocrine Oncology Research Group. 21 Department of Surgery, 22 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 23 St. Stephens Green, 24 Dublin 2, 25 Ireland. 26 Tel No: 0035314022286 27 Funding: Health Research Board (HRA-POR-2013-276) (MMcI) and BHCRDT (MMcI). 1 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 23, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 9, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0791 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]
  • 3311 275 a Specific Radioimmunoassay For
    3311 275 A SPECIFIC RADIOIMMUNOASSAY FOR ANDROSTENEDIONE WITH REDUCED BRIDGE-BINDING Gerald D. Nordblom I , Raymond E. Counsell 2 and Barry G. England I 1 Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Received 3-15-85. ABSTRACT Antibody used in a steroid radlolmmunoassay raised against a steroid hapten-carrier protein conjugate may recognize both the hapten and the chemical bridge to the protein. Use of the same bridge in the radio- isotopic label may lead to higher affinity binding to the label than to the native steroid. Inhibition curves under these conditions are shallow and generally not acceptable for radioimmunoassay procedures. We have developed a radloimmunoassay for androstenedlone that employs different bridges a~ the 118 position of the steroid for the protein conjugate and label. The resulting assay has greatly reduced bridge- binding, has an acceptable slope for the standard curve and is very specific as evidenced by low crossreaetivles to other steroids. INTRODUCTION To develop a radloimmunoassay (RIA) for measuring steroids, antibodies for the assay are produced using a steroid hapten-carrier protein conjugate. The resulting antibodies often recognize and demonstrate high affinity binding to both the steroid and the chemical bridge through which the hapten was attached to the carrier protein. This phenomena is referred to as bridge-binding (I-8). Use of 1251 as the radionuclide to produce a labeled trace for the RIA requires that the iodinated functional group, phenol or imidazole, be attached to the steroid with a chemical bridge. However, if the label-bridge is homologous to the conjugate-bridge, the antibodies will have a higher affinity for the label than the native steroid.
    [Show full text]
  • HSD3B1 and Response to a Nonsteroidal CYP17A1 Inhibitor in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Research JAMA Oncology | Brief Report HSD3B1 and Response to a Nonsteroidal CYP17A1 Inhibitor in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Nima Almassi, MD; Chad Reichard, MD; Jianbo Li, PhD; Carly Russell, MS; Jaselle Perry, MS; Charles J. Ryan, MD; Terence Friedlander, MD; Nima Sharifi, MD Invited Commentary page 562 IMPORTANCE The HSD3B1 (1245C) germline variant encodes for a gain-of-function missense Related article page 558 in 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 (3βHSD1) that results in increased dihydrotestosterone synthesis from extragonadal precursors and is predictive of more rapid progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). OBJECTIVE To determine whether the HSD3B1 (1245C) genotype is predictive of clinical response to extragonadal androgen ablation with nonsteroidal 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1) inhibition in men with metastatic CRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An observational study of men with metastatic CRPC treated with ketoconazole between June 1998 and December 2012 was conducted at the University of California, San Francisco. EXPOSURES Extragonadal androgen ablation with the nonsteroidal CYP17A1 inhibitor ketoconazole among men with metastatic CRPC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end points of analysis were duration of ketoconazole therapy and time to disease progression stratified by HSD3B1 genotype. Disease progression was defined as either biochemical or radiographic progression, using the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 definitions, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time on therapy and time to disease progression. A log-rank test for trend was used to compare outcomes by HSD3B1 genotype. RESULTS A total of 90 men (median [interquartile range] age, 61.5 [55.3-67.0] years) with metastatic CRPC were included in the analysis, with sufficient data to determine duration of ketoconazole therapy and time to disease progression in 88 and 81 patients, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Slow Tight Binding Inhibition of CYP17A1 by Abiraterone Redefines Its Kinetic Selectivity and Dosing Regimen
    JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 17, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.265868 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. JPET # 265868 Slow tight binding inhibition of CYP17A1 by abiraterone redefines its kinetic selectivity and dosing regimen Eleanor Jing Yi Cheong1, Pramod C Nair2, Rebecca Wan Yi Neo1, Ho Thanh Tu1, Fu Lin3, Edmund Chiong4,5, Kesavan Esuvaranathan4,5, Hao Fan6, Russell Z. Szmulewitz7, Cody J. Peer8, William D. Figg8, Christina Li Lin Chai1, John O Miners2, Eric Chun Yong Chan1,9 1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore; 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Flinders Centre for Downloaded from Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; 3Bioinformatics Institute, Biotransformation Innovation Platform (BioTrans), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138671; 4Department of Surgery, jpet.aspetjournals.org National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore; 5Department of Urology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074; 6Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, at ASPET Journals on September 27, 2021 Singapore 138671; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science 23 Drive 4, Singapore 117543; Centre for Computational Biology, DUKE-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857; 7The University of Chicago, Chicago, 8National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 9National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), NUH Medical Centre (NUHMC), 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074 1 | Page JPET Fast Forward.
    [Show full text]