DOCSLIB.ORG

Venture Capital Behemoths

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Venture Capital Behemoths VENTURE CAPITAL BEHEMOTHS In this year’s Midas’ List of Top Technology Investors, Facebook’s initial public offering (IPO) cast a shadow over the rest of the venture capital industry Hall of fame The Midas methodology has evolved since 1 2 3 the list began in 2001, but these names have a knack for staying on Jim Breyer Marc Andreessen Peter Thiel Years on list Jim Breyer takes the Midas Marc Andreessen, co- Peter Thiel was John Doerr 12 crown again this year creator of Mosaic brows- Facebook's first institu- thanks to his firm Accel er and co-founder of tional investor with a Michael Moritz 12 Partners’ early $12.7- Andreessen Horowitz, $500,000 cheque. In Jay Hoag 12 made seed investments 2005, Thiel and some million bet on Zuckerberg. Jim Breyer 11 With an 11% stake at the in Twitter and LinkedIn, friends opened his own IPO, Accel Partners was and bought into invest- venture firm Founders David Cowan 11 Facebook’s second- ments in Skype and Fund and created hedge Chris Schaepe 10 largest shareholder Groupon and Zynga IPOs fund Clarium Capital William Ford 9 Vinod Khosla 9 Kevin Harvey 9 4 5 6 David Chao 8 Douglas Leone 8 Douglas Leone Reid Hoffman Peter Fenton Sequoia Capital’s Doug Reid Hoffman co-found- Peter Fenton backed John Walecka 8 Leone had two IPOs last ed LinkedIn and chair- Twitter when it had 25 Peter Wagner 8 year — ServiceNow and man, board of the people and now serves on Top of the crop CafePress. Leone sits on Mountain View talent the board. Within 24 hours the boards of both. He database. He earned in 2009, he was the lead Firms that score big exits put the most also led Sequoia's Series good returns on a partner behind partners on the Midas list A investment in enter- $40,000-investment in SpringSource’s $420-mn Partners on list prise Wi-Fi company Facebook in 2004; he was sale to VMWare and Accel Partners 9 Meraki an early backer of Zynga FriendFeed's Facebook sale Sequoila Capital 6 Benchmark 5 Greylock Partners 5 7 8 9 NewEnterprises Associates 5 Jim Goetz Scott Sandell Jeremy Levine 4 Bain Capital Ventures Jim Goetz had two big Scott Sandell, an early Jeremy Levine led the 4 Bessemer Venture Partners IPO scores in 2012: investor in Workday, also first VC round in Yelp in 4 Kleiner Perkins Caufield Ruckus Wireless (current invested in Nicira, which 2005, when the local & Bayers market cap: $1.7 billion) VMWare acquired last reviews site claimed only 4 Meritech Capital Partners and security outfit Palo year for $1.26 billion. 100,000 San Franciscans Exit >$200 million in 2012 Alto Networks ($3.8 bil- Sandell was a lead as users. He also led the Sequoia Capital 9 lion). Goetz was a first- investor in Playdom, 2007 round for LinkedIn, round investor and which sold to Disney in which went public in Accel Partners 6 remains on both boards 2010 for $563 million 2011 Benchmark 5 Meritech Capital Partners 5 David Sze, Greylock Greylock Partners 5 Greylock Partners’ David Sze led the firm’s investment in 10 Facebook in early 2006 and its investments in LinkedIn 4 New Enterprise Associates (Greylock held a 16 per cent stake at the 2011 IPO) and 4 Bain Capital Venture Pandora (14 per cent stake at 2011 IPO). 4 Bessemer Venture Partners 2 Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Bayer Midas touch | Facebook’s May 18, 2012, IPO was the attention away from enterprise early-stage firms on Sand Hill Road largest for an internet company, briefly companies with IPOs, such as Workday, have been Accel, Benchmark, valuing the company at $104 billion ServiceNow, Palo Alto Networks, Ruckus Greylock, Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins, | Last year saw large consumer tech exits Wireless and Splunk and in recent years, Andreessen such as the M&As of Instagram (acquired | The June 29, 2012 offering of ServiceNow, Horowitz by Facebook), OMGPOP (acquired by the first significant IPO since Facebook, | Seed investors jumped on the scene, Zynga) and Tudou in China, as well as brought some confidence back to the driven by the decreasing cost of starting the IPOs of Kayak, Yelp, Trulia and market. The Workday’s IPO in October a company. These investors have China’s VIP Shop was the second-largest in 2012 climbed the Midas rankings over the | The focus on Facebook may have drawn | In recent years, the most sought-after past few years Source: Forbes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mont Pelerin Society
    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER FORTY-ONE CHINA, GLOBALIZATION, CAPITALISM, SILICON VALLEY, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, AND EXCEPTIONALISM PETER THIEL & PETER ROBINSON HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 1 1 China, Globalization, Capitalism, Silicon Valley, Political Correctness, and Exceptionalism A Conversation Between Peter Theil and Peter Robinson January 17, 2020 Peter Robinson: The late economist and foreign policy analyst Hoover fellow Henry Rowen writing in 1996, quote, "When will China become a democracy? "The answer is around the year 2015. "This prediction is based on China's steady "and impressive economic growth, "which in turn fits the pattern of the way in which freedom "has grown in Asia and elsewhere in the World." Worked in South Korea, worked in Taiwan. Economic growth leads to democracy. In China, what went wrong? Peter Thiel: Well, Peter, this is always a set up for me to start by both flattering you and criticizing you a little bit, since there was that very famous Reagan speech you gave, that you wrote for Reagan, where it was, you know, tear down that wall, Mr. Gorbachev, and it was very effective. But it was perhaps, it was not only in the West that we learned lessons from it, the Chinese communists also paid very careful attention to it, and they learned that you had to have perestroika without glasnost. You had to get rid of the Marxism without getting rid of the Leninism, and they learned somehow the very opposite lessons of that fateful year 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020
    Venture Capital and Antitrust Transcript of Proceedings at the Public Workshop Held by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice February 12, 2020 Paul Brest Hall Stanford University 555 Salvatierra Walk Stanford, CA 94305 Table of Contents Opening Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 1 Fireside Chat with Michael Moritz: Trends in VC Investment: How did we get here? ........ 5 Antitrust for VCs: A Discussion with Stanford Law Professor Doug Melamed ................... 14 Panel 1: What explains the Kill Zones? .................................................................................... 22 Afternoon Remarks .................................................................................................................... 40 Panel 2: Monetizing data ............................................................................................................ 42 Panel 3: Investing in platform-dominated markets ................................................................. 62 Roundtable: Is there a problem and what is the solution? ..................................................... 84 Closing Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 99 Public Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020 Opening Remarks • Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice MAKAN
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Somewhere in the Middle
    OUR FIRM LMM GROUP CLIENTS TRANSACTIONS NEWS & INTEL CONTACT IN THIS SECTION LOOKING SOMEWHERE IN THE Executive Perspective IT Index MIDDLE News Room Quarterly Earnings March 10, 2006 Scoreboard Spotlight by: Kelly Holman Tracker VDI Accel-KKR LLC didn't set out to specialize in middle-market private equity buyouts in the high-tech sector. Its founders, an Subscribe unusual combination of dealmakers, were focused in 2000 on the bright prospects of the Internet, just as many other investors and entrepreneurs were. But that vista quickly turned as dark as night when the dot-com bubble burst, and Accel-KKR suddenly needed to make a rapid course correction. It did. Today the Menlo Park, Calif.-based firm has made a name for itself acquiring small but fast-growing technology companies. Even as top-tier buyout groups lick their chops over the possibility of doing deals involving big software corporations, Accel- KKR keeps its attention on midmarket and small tech outfits with $15 million to $150 million in annual revenue: software developers, hardware makers, Internet firm and information technology services businesses. To be sure, it's hardly the only middle-market private equity group interested in technology businesses - a number of buyout groups, large and small, have made technology their core investment focus. But Accel-KKR's board and the background it represents set it apart. Members include financial engineering icons Henry Kravis and George Roberts of Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts & Co.; KKR partner Marc Lipschultz; veteran venture capitalist and Accel managing partner Jim Breyer; and former Wells Fargo & Co. chief executive Paul Hazen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise & Role of Venture Studios in Healthcare Innovation
    The Rise & Role of Venture Studios in Healthcare Innovation Session # 195, August 12, 2021 Le s Wilkins on Chief Operating Officer, Hashed Health DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are solely those of the author/presenter and do not necessarily represent any policy or position of HIMSS. 1 Welcome Le s Wilkins on Chief Operating Officer, Hashed Health #HIMSS21 2 Conflict of Interest Les Wilkinson, COO, Hashed Health Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. #HIMSS21 3 Agenda • Current State of Innovation. • Studios are innovating innovation. • Studio value proposition. • Studio characteristics and structure. • Studio results. #HIMSS21 4 Learning Objectives – By the end of this session, the audience will be able to: • State common reasons healthcare startups fail and how new innovation models can de-risk the innovation process. • Describe traditional corporate innovation challenges in her/his own words. • Design a venture studio process for moving ideas to commercialization. • Apply the principles of a venture studio process to their own innovation efforts. • Identify how to differentiate between accelerators, incubators, corporate innovation programs and new venture studio models. • Recognize whether a venture studio model could be a fit for their organization. #HIMSS21 5 Startup Mythology The Garage 6 Startup Reality >90% 75% 1% Percentage of Venture Backed Startup Failure Rate Companies that NEVER Return Cash Odds of achieving Unicorn Status to Investors Source: Startup Genome, 2019 Source: CBInsights Report Source: Failory #HIMSS21 7 No Market Need Ran Out of Cash Poor User Experience Why Not the Right Team Startups Fail Pricing and COGS Competition Source: CBInsights #HIMSS21 8 Innovation is a Priority for Enterprise .
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements Kate Litvak†
    File: 07 Litvak Final Created on: 4/2/2009 2:10:00 PM Last Printed: 4/2/2009 2:13:00 PM Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements Kate Litvak† This Article uses a hand-collected dataset of venture capital partnership agreements to study venture capitalist (VC) compensation. Several new findings emerge. First, VC compen- sation consists of three elements, not two (management fee and carried interest), as common- ly believed. The third element is the value-of-distribution rules that specify when during the fund’s life VCs receive distributions. These rules often generate an interest-free loan to VCs from limited partners. A shift from the most popular distribution rule to the second-most popular rule can affect VC compensation as much as or more than common variations in management fee (from 2 percent to 2.5 percent of committed capital) or carried interest (from 20 percent to 25 percent of fund profit). Second, VC compensation is often more com- plex and manipulable than it could have been. However, more complex management-fee provisions predict lower total compensation; thus, complexity is not used to camouflage high pay. Third, common proxies for VC quality predict higher levels of the more transparent forms of VC compensation (carried interest and management fee) but do not predict the levels of opaque compensation (interest-free loan, as determined by distribution rules). Fourth, long-term VC performance predicts fund size (which in turn predicts VC pay, con- trolling for fund size), but recent performance does not predict changes in fund size. Finally, VC compensation is less performance-based than commonly believed: for vintage years between 1986 and 1997 (most recent years for fully liquidated funds), about half of total VC compensation comes from the nonrisky management fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter Valued in Billions As Popularity Climbs 15 December 2010
    Twitter valued in billions as popularity climbs 15 December 2010 veterans Mike McCue and David Rosenblatt to its board of directors as it tightens its focus on turning its popularity into revenue. Twitter co-founder Evan Williams stepped down in October as chief executive, ceding the helm to Google veteran Costolo, who was brought in last year to help the micro-blogging service make money. Costolo, whose Web content distribution company Feedburner was purchased by Google in 2007, has A fresh infusion of investment cash pushed Twitter's been at the forefront of efforts to begin monetizing market value up to 3.7 billion dollars on Wednesday with Twitter since he joined the company last year. the number of people using the microblogging service climbing to 175 million. Twitter, which allows users to fire off messages of 140 characters or less known as "tweets," has enjoyed skyrocketing popularity since it was launched in 2006 by Williams, Jack Dorsey and Biz A fresh infusion of investment cash pushed Stone. Twitter's market value up to 3.7 billion dollars on Wednesday with the number of people using the McCue is chief executive of social magazine iPad microblogging service climbing to 175 million. application maker Flipboard while Rosenblatt's resume includes stints at Microsoft, Google, More than 25 billion "tweets" were fired off during DoubleClick and Netscape. the past 12 months, with Twitter adding 100 million new accounts during that same time frame, the "These additional resources and expertise will be firm's chief executive Dick Costolo said in an online extremely helpful as Twitter continues to grow as a post.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital Communities 1
    Venture Capital Communities 1 Amit Bubna Indian School of Business Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India 500 032 Sanjiv R. Das Leavey School of Business Santa Clara University, CA 95053 Nagpurnanand Prabhala Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 February 27, 2014 1Comments welcome. We thank Alexandre Baptista, David Feldman, Jiekun Huang, Ozgur Ince, Vladimir Ivanov, Pete Kyle, Josh Lerner, Laura Lindsey, Robert Marquez, Vojislav Maksi- movic, Manju Puri, Krishna Ramaswamy, Rajdeep Singh, Richard Smith, Anjan Thakor, Susan Woodward, Bernard Yeung, and participants at the CAF, FIRS, Midwest Finance Association, World Private Equity and TAPMI conferences, and seminar participants at Blackrock, Florida, George Washington University, Georgia State, Georgia Tech, ISB, Kellogg, Maryland, NUS, the R User Group, Rutgers, UNSW, and Villanova for helpful comments. The authors may be reached at their respective email addresses: amit [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]. Abstract Venture Capital Communities While it is well-known that syndication is extensively used in venture capital (VC) financing, less is known about the composition of VC syndicates. We present new evidence on this issue. While VC firms have a large pool of syndicate partners to choose from, they tend to draw from smaller groups of partners that we call VC \communities." We implement new techniques to uncover these groups and use them to understand preferences driving syndicate partner selection. We find a complex pattern in which preferences for dissimilar partners to extend influence coexist with preferences for similarity in terms of functional style on dimensions of industry, stage, and geographic specialization.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia Capital Invests in Klarna
    May 05, 2012 12:10 BST Sequoia Capital invests in Klarna Sequoia Capital is investing in Klarna AB ("Klarna"), one of the Nordic region’s leading e-commerce payment solution providers, and will become Klarna’s largest single owner. Sven Hagströmer, Chairman of Investment AB Öresund ("Öresund"), has been named Chairman of the Board of Klarna, and Michael Moritz, Partner at Sequoia Capital, has been made a member of the board. During his tenure at Sequoia Capital, Mr Moritz has invested in companies such as Google, Yahoo and PayPal and has served on the boards of these companies. - Sequoia Capital has extensive expertise and many years’ experience in investing in and developing promising growth companies operating in industries that are exciting for successful global companies. We are now stepping up the pace of our international expansion, first in Europe and then globally, said Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna and previous CEO of Kreditor. Sequoia Capital’s previous investments include PayPal, Google and YouTube. E-commerce in Europe is growing rapidly, and Sequoia Capital sees great potential in Klarna. - Klarna has done a fabulous job serving the needs of merchants and consumers in Europe’s e-commerce market, said Michael Moritz, Partner at Sequoia Capital. With e-commerce growing rapidly across the E.U., where card based payments are only 1/3 that of the U.S., Klarna has an incredible opportunity to be the most trusted solution in the $40 billion global payments market. Klarna will also do a directed new share issue of SEK 70m in conjunction with the change of ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Breyer of Accel Partners Elected Chairman of National Venture Capital Association
    Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT PR Newswire May 13, 2004 Thursday Jim Breyer of Accel Partners Elected Chairman Of National Venture Capital Association SECTION: FINANCIAL NEWS LENGTH: 694 words New Board Directors Also Named During Association's Annual Meeting SAN FRANCISCO, May 13 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Venture Capital Association's (NVCA) Board of Directors today unanimously elected James W. Breyer to serve as its Chairman for the coming year. The election took place at the Association's 2004 Annual Meeting in San Francisco, CA. Mr. Breyer is a managing partner at Accel Partners, a leading venture capital firm with offices in Palo Alto, CA and London, England. In his role as NVCA Chairman, Mr. Breyer will be responsible for setting the public policy agenda and overall strategic direction of the country's premier venture capital association. He joined the NVCA Board in 1999 and has served on the Capital Formation, Membership and Government Affairs committees. He also served as the 2002 NVCA Annual Meeting Chairman. Mr. Breyer succeeds Jeffrey Harris, Managing Director of Warburg Pincus, who completed his one- year term as NVCA Chairman. "Never before has the role of the NVCA been so important to the future of our asset class and the entrepreneurial spirit in the United States," Mr. Breyer commented. "I look forward to leading the Association in the coming year and making certain that venture capital investment continues to recognized as a key economic driver for our country. Our priorities include maintaining an industry focus on prudent, long-term investing, preserving the use of employee stock options for emerging growth companies, and actively engaging members in critical NVCA activities." Outgoing Chairman Jeffrey Harris reflected: During the past year the NVCA successfully advanced its public policy agenda while providing a high level of innovative services to its membership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Economic Implications of Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment Decisions
    Chazen Society Fellow Interest Paper The Political and Economic Implications of Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment Decisions JEREMY BROWN MBA ’09 Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have been thrown into the media spotlight recently, with calls for the nationally controlled investment vehicles to accept or adopt some level of regulation to govern their actions and investment decisions. This paper attempts to apply general ideas from the world of asset management to demonstrate a model in which SWFs can generate excess economic returns while minimizing the political risk that is inherent in a nation-state controlling and managing an investment fund. History and Background of SWFs The difficulty in analyzing SWFs in any coherent review begins with the difficulty of determining a simple definition of a SWF. A February 2008 study conducted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lists eight separate definitions, which are further distinguished by five different objectives. For the purposes of this review, however, the focus is on two definitions that are broader than those in the IMF report. These come from the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute and the United States Department of the Treasury. The Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, an impartial organization established to study fund effects on global economics, defines a sovereign wealth fund as follows: A Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) is a state-owned investment fund composed of financial assets such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or other financial instruments funded by foreign exchange assets. SWFs can be structured as a fund or as a reserve investment corporation. Some funds also invest indirectly in domestic state owned enterprises.1 1 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, “About Sovereign Wealth Funds,” Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Inc., http://www.swfinstitute.org/swf.php.
    [Show full text]
  • Sfmoma Presents Rafael Lozano-Hemmer and Tauba Auerbach Mixed Media Exhibitions in April 2020
    SFMOMA PRESENTS RAFAEL LOZANO-HEMMER AND TAUBA AUERBACH MIXED MEDIA EXHIBITIONS IN APRIL 2020 Lozano-Hemmer’s First Major Survey in the U.S., Unstable Presence Features Large- Scale Participatory Installations and Immersive Environments Auerbach’s First Museum Survey, S v Z Traverses the Boundaries Between Art, Design, Science and Craft Also Opening at SFMOMA, Select Video Projections from Theaster Gates and Cauleen Smith Shown Together for the First Time SAN FRANCISCO, CA (November 12, 2019)—The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) will present two major exhibitions celebrating the mixed media work of contemporary artists Rafael Lozano-Hemmer and Tauba Auerbach this spring. The artist’s first major survey exhibition in the U.S., Rafael Lozano-Hemmer: Unstable Presence (April 25–November 1, 2020) will explore our presence in fundamentally turbulent environments through a focused selection of 16 engaging installations on the museum’s seventh floor. Simultaneously on the museum’s fourth floor, Auerbach’s first museum survey, Tauba Auerbach — S v Z (April 25–September 7, 2020), will highlight her prolific and varied output over the last 16 years. 1 San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Lozano-Hemmer and Auerbach Press Release Also on view this spring will be select video projections from renowned interdisciplinary artists Cauleen Smith and Theaster Gates in Future Histories (April 25–November 1, 2020). Rafael Lozano-Hemmer: Unstable Presence April 25–November 1, 2020 Floor 7 Air and water, heartbeats and voices, text and light—these are the materials of media artist Rafael Lozano-Hemmer. Over the past few decades, the Mexico City–born, Montreal-based artist has earned international recognition for large-scale participatory installations that frequently incorporate technology and the architecture of public spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Timeline
    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
    [Show full text]