Arxiv:1309.3710V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 14 Sep 2013 Abstract
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON DARK ENERGY COSMOLOGICAL MODEL PARAMETERS by MUHAMMAD OMER FAROOQ B.Sc., University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan, 2007 M.Sc., University of Manchester, UK, 2009 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department Of Physics College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2013 arXiv:1309.3710v1 [astro-ph.CO] 14 Sep 2013 Abstract The expansion rate of the Universe changes with time, initially slowing (decelerating) when the universe was matter dominated, because of the mutual gravitational attraction of all the matter in it, and more recently speeding up (accelerating). A number of cosmological observations now strongly support the idea that the Universe is spatially flat (provided the dark energy density is at least approximately time independent) and is currently undergoing an accelerated cosmological expansion. A majority of cosmologists consider \dark energy" to be the cause of this observed accelerated cosmological expansion. The \standard" model of cosmology is the spatially-flat ΛCDM model. Although most predictions of the ΛCDM model are reasonably consistent with measurements, the ΛCDM model has some curious features. To overcome these difficulties, different Dark Energy models have been proposed. Two of these models, the XCDM parametrization and the slow rolling scalar field model φCDM, along with \standard" ΛCDM, with the generalization of XCDM and φCDM in non-flat spatial geometries are considered here and observational data are used to constrain their parameter sets. In this thesis, we start with a overview of the general theory of relativity, Friedmann's equations, and distance measures in cosmology. In the following chapters we explain how we can constrain the three above mentioned cosmological models using three data sets: measurements of the Hubble parameter H(z), Supernova (SN) apparent magnitudes, and the baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) peak length scale, as functions of redshift z. We then discuss constraints on the deceleration-acceleration transition redshift zda using unbinned and binned H(z) data. Finally, we incorporate the spatial curvature in the XCDM and φCDM model and determine observational constraints on the parameters of these expanded models. OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON DARK ENERGY COSMOLOGICAL MODEL PARAMETERS by MUHAMMAD OMER FAROOQ B.Sc., University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan, 2007 M.Sc., University of Manchester, UK, 2009 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department Of Physics College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2013 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Bharat Ratra Copyright MUHAMMAD OMER FAROOQ 2013 Abstract The expansion rate of the Universe changes with time, initially slowing (decelerating) when the universe was matter dominated, because of the mutual gravitational attraction of all the matter in it, and more recently speeding up (accelerating). A number of cosmological observations now strongly support the idea that the Universe is spatially flat (provided the dark energy density is at least approximately time independent) and is currently undergoing an accelerated cosmological expansion. A majority of cosmologists consider \dark energy" to be the cause of this observed accelerated cosmological expansion. The \standard" model of cosmology is the spatially-flat ΛCDM model. Although most predictions of the ΛCDM model are reasonably consistent with measurements, the ΛCDM model has some curious features. To overcome these difficulties, different Dark Energy models have been proposed. Two of these models, the XCDM parametrization and the slow rolling scalar field model φCDM, along with \standard" ΛCDM, with the generalization of XCDM and φCDM in non-flat spatial geometries are considered here and observational data are used to constrain their parameter sets. In this thesis, we start with a overview of the general theory of relativity, Friedmann's equations, and distance measures in cosmology. In the following chapters we explain how we can constrain the three above mentioned cosmological models using three data sets: measurements of the Hubble parameter H(z), Supernova (SN) apparent magnitudes, and the baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) peak length scale, as functions of redshift z. We then discuss constraints on the deceleration-acceleration transition redshift zda using unbinned and binned H(z) data. Finally, we incorporate the spatial curvature in the XCDM and φCDM model and determine observational constraints on the parameters of these expanded models. Table of Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xxi Acknowledgements xxiv Dedication xxv 1 Introduction1 1.1 Basics and Fundamentals . .1 1.2 Mathematical Background . .5 1.2.1 Notation . .5 1.2.2 Metric Tensor . .7 1.2.3 Covariant Derivative . 14 1.2.4 Geodesic Equation . 16 1.2.5 Relating the Geodesic Equation with Newtonian Gravity . 25 1.3 Einstein's Field Equation . 29 1.3.1 Riemann Tensor, Ricci Tensor, Ricci Scalar, Einstein Tensor . 30 1.3.2 Energy-Momentum Tensor . 32 1.3.3 Conservation Laws and Energy Evolution . 37 1.3.4 Einstein's Field Equation . 41 1.4 Hubble's Law and Redshift of Distant Galaxies . 43 1.5 Metric of the Universe . 46 1.5.1 Homogeneous, 2-Dimensional Spaces . 46 1.5.2 Homogeneous, 3-Dimensional Spaces . 48 1.6 Derivation of Friedmann's Equations from General Relativity . 54 1.7 Solutions of Friedmann's Equations . 60 1.7.1 Deceleration Parameter . 61 1.7.2 Curvature-Dominated Universe (k 6= 0, q0 = 0, ρi = 0) . 61 1.7.3 Spatially-Flat Single-Component Universe (k = 0; q0 = (1 + 3!)=2) . 62 1.7.4 Multi-Component Universes . 66 2 Distance Measures in Cosmology 79 2.1 Comoving or Coordinate Distance . 80 2.1.1 Some Insight: Start with 2-Dimensional Expansion . 82 2.1.2 3-Dimensional Expansion . 84 2.2 Physical Distance . 84 2.3 Transverse Comoving Distance . 85 vi 2.4 Dimensionless Coordinate Distance . 86 2.5 Angular Diameter Distance . 86 2.6 Luminosity Distance . 86 2.7 Distance Modulus . 90 3 Dark Energy and Dark Energy Models 92 3.1 Observational Evidence for Dark Energy . 92 3.1.1 Age of the Universe . 95 3.1.2 Supernovae Apparent Magnitude Observations (SNeIa) . 100 3.1.3 Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) Measurements . 107 3.2 Spatially-Flat ΛCDM Model (Standard Cosmological Model) . 110 3.3 ΛCDM with Non-Zero Curvature . 110 3.3.1 No Big Bang Region in the ΛCDM Model . 111 3.3.2 Condition for Recollapse in the ΛCDM Model . 114 3.3.3 Flat ΛCDM and the Zero Acceleration Line for General ΛCDM . 118 3.4 Potential Problems with ΛCDM . 118 3.4.1 Theoretical Puzzles . 118 3.4.2 Potential Observational Problems125 .................. 120 3.5 XCDM Parameterization . 122 3.5.1 No Big Bang Surface in the Parameter Space of the Non-Flat XCDM Parametrization . 122 3.5.2 Zero Acceleration Condition in the XCDM Parametrization . 123 3.6 Scalar Field Dark Energy Models . 124 3.6.1 Ratra-Peebles Scalar Field Model . 126 3.6.2 Zero Acceleration Condition in the φCDM model . 128 3.6.3 Generalized Relation for κ(α) for a(t) / tn Initial Condition: . 128 4 Data Analysis Techniques 134 4.1 χ2 and Likelihood Function . 135 4.2 Nuisance Parameter . 136 4.3 Constraints on Individual Cosmological Parameters . 137 5 Hubble Parameter Measurements Constraints 139 5.1 Dark Energy Models . 139 5.2 Constraints from the H(z) Data . 140 5.3 Constraints from the SNIa Data . 144 5.4 Constraints from the BAO Data . 150 5.5 Joint Constraints . 153 5.6 Conclusion . 157 5.7 Addition of z = 2:3 Data Point . 158 5.8 Improved Constraints . 164 vii 6 Constraints on Transition Red-Shift from H(z) Data 172 6.1 Introduction . 172 6.2 Constraints on Parameters and Transition Redshift . 174 6.3 Conclusion . 177 7 Binned Hubble Parameter Measurements and the Cosmological Deceleration- Acceleration Transition 180 7.1 Introduction . 180 7.2 Binning the Data . 184 7.3 Constraints from the binned data . 187 7.4 Conclusion . 189 8 Observational Constraints on Non-Flat Dynamical Dark Energy Cosmo- logical Models 199 8.1 Introduction . 199 8.2 Time Varying Dark Energy Models in Curved Space . 203 8.3 Observational Constraints . 207 8.3.1 Constraints from H(z), SNIa, and BAO data sets, one at a time . 208 8.3.2 Constraints from Combinations of Data Sets . 214 8.4 Conclusion . 220 9 Conclusions 222 A Derivation of Scalar Field Equation of Motion 223 B Derivation of Scalar Field Stress-Energy Tensor 226 B.1 Spcetime Signature . 226 B.2 Signature (+; −; −; −).............................. 227 B.3 Signature (−; +; +; +) .............................. 229 C Solution of Standard Cubic Equation 231 D Different H(z) Data Sets 233 E SNeIa \Union 2.1" Compilation Data 237 F Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) Data 254 Bibliography 256 viii List of Figures 1.1 Spherical coordinate system. Figure shows r = constant surface, hence, dr = 0 on the surface. .9 1.2 Variational Principle. 18 1.3 Brachistochrone problem, curve of fastest descent. It is the curve between the two points P (0; 0) and Q(a; b) that is covered in the least time by a point particle that starts at P (0; 0) with zero kinetic energy and is constrained to move along the curve \Brachistochrone" to Q(a; b), under the action of only constant gravity and assuming no friction. 24 1.4 2-dimensional examples of positive, zero and negative curvature universes (from left to right respectively). The zero and negative ones show only a finite part of the space, which extend to infinity in all directions. 47 1.5 This figure shows the evolution of scale factor a(t) as a function of cosmic time (in units of Hubble time) of single component Universes. The red line is for the Universe that is only curvature dominated (remember that according to Friedmann's equation, a Universe with curvature only should be open, so k = −1) and scale factor behaves like a(t) / t.