ORIGINAL

Table 2 Proposed settlement hierarchy and housing development

Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development Total Made up of Strategic The most sustainable towns and 16,3981 8,588 completions/commitments, 7,810 allocated settlements villages in the district and the focus for 2,359 1,509 completions/commitments, 850 allocated the majority of development. These Haddenham 1,051 736 completions/commitments, 315 allocated settlements act as service centres for /Halton Camp 1,128 128 completions/commitments, 1,000 allocated other villages around them. The plan Winslow 1,166 581 completions/commitments, 585 allocated will allocate sites at strategic (TOTAL settlements 22,102) Land adjacent Allocation of land adjoining Milton Sites within the parish of Newton 2,212 357 completions/commitments, 1,855 allocated to that falls within Longville. Keynes district Larger villages Larger, more sustainable villages that 627 627 completions/commitments, no allocated sites have at least reasonable access to 176 116 completions/commitments, 60 allocated facilities and services and public 18 18 completions/commitments, no allocated sites transport, making them sustainable 100 77 completions/commitments, 23 allocated locations for development. The plan 199 199 completions/commitments, no allocated sites allocates sites at some of the larger Steeple 216 98 completions/commitments, 118 allocated villages 128 128 completions/commitments, no allocated sites Stone (including Hartwell) 36 26 completions/commitments, 10 allocated (including Fleet 166 91 completions/commitments, 75 allocated Marston) Whitchurch 63 41 completions/commitments, 22 allocated Wing 125 125 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 109 109 completions/commitments, no allocated sites (TOTAL 1,963)

1 This includes some figures for Stoke Mandeville, and parishes. Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development Medium Medium villages have some provision Bierton (including Broughton) 23 23 completions/commitments, no allocated sites villages key services and facilities, making them Brill 6 6 completions/commitments, no allocated sites moderately sustainable locations for 107 107 completions/commitments, no allocated sites development. The plan allocates some Cuddington 25 4 completions/commitments, 21 allocated sites at medium villages 8 8 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 74 74 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 42 42 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 23 3 completions/commitments, 20 allocated 171 1 completion/commitment, 170 allocated 47 38 completions/commitments, 9 allocated 15 15 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 48 31 completions/commitments, 17 allocated 8 8 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 48 48 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 59 22 completions/commitments, 37 allocated 101 101 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 149 149 completions/commitments, no allocated sites 105 105 completions/commitments, no allocated sites Weston Turville 36 36 completions/commitments, no allocated sites (TOTAL 1,095) Smaller Smaller, less sustainable villages which To come forward through neighbourhood plans or through the villages have relatively poor access to services Akeley development management process considered against relevant and facilities. It is expected that some policies in the Plan small scale development could be accommodated at smaller villages without causing unreasonable harm. Bishopstone This level of development is also likely Buckland to help maintain existing communities. Sites at smaller villages will come forward either through neighbourhood plans or by individual ‘windfall’ Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development planning applications, no site Chilton allocations are made at smaller villages Dinton Ford Halton Hardwick Ivinghoe Aston Ludgershall and Nash Oakley Oving (including ) Slapton Stowe and Thornborough Twyford Weedon Westbury Westcott Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development Whaddon Other The remainder of settlements in the All remaining settlements (listed To come forward through neighbourhood plans or through the settlements district which are not sustainable in the settlement hierarchy development management process considered against relevant locations for development and are document) policies in the Plan places where it is likely that any development would cause harm to the local environment. Some very limited development could take place in accordance with the policies in this plan, but no allocations for housing will be made

MODIFIED

Table 2 Proposed settlement hierarchy and housing development

Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development

Total Made up of Completions and Allocations commitments Strategic The most sustainable towns and villages in the district Aylesbury 16,5862 13,047 3,539 settlements and the focus for the majority of development. These Buckingham 2,166 1,616 550 settlements act as service centres for other villages Haddenham 1,032 763 269 around them. The plan will allocate sites at strategic Wendover/Halton Camp 1,132 132 1,000 settlements Winslow 897 582 315 (TOTAL 21,813) North east Allocation of land adjoining Milton Keynes that falls Sites within the parishes of Newton 3,362 2,212 1,150 Aylesbury Vale within Aylesbury Vale district Longville and Stoke Hammond. Larger villages Larger, more sustainable villages that have at least Aston Clinton 625 625 0 reasonable access to facilities and services and public Edlesborough 177 177 0 transport, making them sustainable locations for Ivinghoe 26 26 0 development. The plan allocates sites at some of the Long Crendon 103 103 0 larger villages Pitstone 199 199 0 293 293 0 Stoke Mandeville 284 284 0 Stone (including Hartwell) 54 28 26 Waddesdon (including ) 192 192 0 Whitchurch 82 60 22 Wing 125 125 0 Wingrave 111 111 0 (TOTAL 2,271) Medium villages Medium villages have some provision key services and Bierton (including Broughton) 23 23 0 facilities, making them moderately sustainable Brill 5 5 0

2 This includes some figures for Stoke Mandeville, Bierton and Weston Turville parishes. Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development

locations for development. The plan allocates some Cheddington 112 112 0 sites at medium villages Cuddington 28 5 23 Gawcott 15 15 0 Great Horwood 75 75 0 Grendon Underwood 56 56 0 Ickford 33 3 30 Maids Moreton 185 15 170 Marsh Gibbon 60 60 0 Marsworth 32 32 0 Newton Longville 53 36 17 North Marston 9 9 0 Padbury 51 51 0 Quainton 58 21 37 Stewkley 100 100 0 Stoke Hammond 209 209 0 Tingewick 108 108 0 Weston Turville 70 70 0 (TOTAL 1,282) Smaller villages Smaller, less sustainable villages which have relatively Adstock To come forward through neighbourhood plans poor access to services and facilities. It is expected Akeley or through the development management that some small scale development could be Ashendon process considered against relevant policies in accommodated at smaller villages without causing Aston Abbotts the Plan unreasonable harm. This level of development is also Beachampton likely to help maintain existing communities. Sites at Bishopstone smaller villages will come forward either through Buckland neighbourhood plans or by individual ‘windfall’ Calvert Green planning applications, no site allocations are made at Chackmore smaller villages Charndon Chearsley Chilton Cublington Dagnall Dinton Drayton Parslow Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development

East Claydon Ford Granborough Great Brickhill Halton Hardwick Ivinghoe Aston Little Horwood Ludgershall Mentmore and Ledburn Mursley Nash Northall Oakley Oving (including Pitchcott) Preston Bissett Shabbington Slapton Soulbury Stowe and Dadford Swanbourne Thornborough Turweston Twyford Weedon Westbury Westcott Whaddon Worminghall Other The remainder of settlements in the district which are All remaining settlements (listed in To come forward through neighbourhood plans settlements not sustainable locations for development and are the settlement hierarchy document) or through the development management places where it is likely that any development would process considered against relevant policies in cause harm to the local environment. Some very the Plan limited development could take place in accordance with the policies in this plan, but no allocations for Category Description Settlements Amount of housing development

housing will be made