Attractant for Vinegar Fly, Drosophila Busckii, and Cluster Fly, Pollenia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attractant for Vinegar Fly, Drosophila Busckii, and Cluster Fly, Pollenia Attractant for Vinegar Fly, Drosophila busckii, and Cluster Fly, Pollenia rudis (Diptera: Drosophilidae et Calliphoridae) Vincas Bu¯daa,*, Sandra Radžiute˙b, and Erikas Lutovinovasb a Vilnius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, M. K. Cˇ iurlionio 21/27, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania. Fax: +3 70 5 2 72 93 52. E-mail: [email protected] b Institute of Ecology, Vilnius University, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius-21, Lithuania * Author for correspondence and reprint requests Z. Naturforsch. 64 c, 267 – 270 (2009); received September 4/October 24, 2008 A fi eld test carried out in an industrial greenhouse in Lithuania revealed the attractive- ness of synthetic methyl salicylate (MeSa) to two dipteran species: the vinegar fl y, Dro- sophila busckii (Drosophilidae), and the cluster fl y, Pollenia rudis (Calliphoridae). The at- tractant for the former fl y species was especially effective, as sticky traps containing 0.25 ml of MeSa captured (814 ± 55) D. busckii fl ies/trap on average compared to (12 ± 4) fl ies/trap in control traps. The mean capture of P. rudis [(42 ± 4) fl ies/trap] was signifi cantly higher in MeSa-baited traps compared to the control traps [(13 ± 4) fl ies/trap]. The presence of MeSa in emissions of many fruits suitable for D. busckii feeding allows to attribute this attractant to kairomones. In case of P. rudis, MeSa should be attributed to synomones (compounds benefi cial for both receiver and sender), because adult fl ies feeding on fl owers act as pol- linators. This is the fi rst report on the fi eld-active attractant for D. busckii and the second for P. rudis. Key words: Attractiveness, Field Trapping, Methyl Salicylate Introduction single species). Two of the chemicals in the three- component attractive blends are the same: ethanol Chemical attractants are a useful tool for insect and acetic acid, one component being different: monitoring. Therefore, extension of our knowl- either 2-phenylethanol or ethyl acetate (Casana- edge on both attractive compounds and species Giner et al., 1999; Zhu et al., 2003). responding to the chemicals is of great impor- Within the family Calliphoridae, which includes tance. more than 1000 species (Nartshuk, 2003), a phe- The order Diptera is among the species-richest romone of a single species was identifi ed and ones. It includes many species of economic im- attractants for only 8 species were revealed (El- portance, i.e. both useful insects (e.g., pollinators) Sayed, 2008). It should be noted that all 5 com- and pests (transmitters of human, animal and pounds known up to now as attractants for fruit plant diseases). However, chemical attractants fl ies (Drosophilidae) attract some species from are known for relatively few species in this order, the Calliphoridae family as well. Other attract- especially when compared to lepidopterans (El- ants include phenols (phenol, p-cresol), organic Sayed, 2008), thus dipterans remain to be investi- acids (butyric, valeric, benzoic), aliphatic alcohols gated much more thoroughly in this aspect. (2-methylpropan-1-ol, butan-2-ol, delta-1-octen- The Drosophilidae family is one of the best- 3-ol), hydrogen sulfi de compounds (1,2-dimeth- studied families within the order Diptera in dif- yldisulfane and 1,3-dimethyltrisulfane), an ester ferent aspects. About 3000 species are known in (sec-butyl acetate) and a ketone (propan-2-one) this family (e.g. Nartshuk, 2003). However, avail- (El-Sayed, 2008). able data on chemical attractants (including phe- Taking into consideration the richness of spe- romones) are scarce. Sex and/or aggregation phe- cies within the two dipteran families briefl y re- romones have been identifi ed for 34 species and viewed, one can conclude, that the knowledge of attractants for 12 species only (El-Sayed, 2008). attractant composition still remains poorly inves- The known attractants include methyl eugenol tigated. (attractive for fruit fl ies of 10 species) and two Many chemicals of plant origin are potential three-component blends (each attractive for a attractants for insects including methyl salicylate 0939 – 5075/2009/0300 – 0267 $ 06.00 © 2009 Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, Tübingen · http://www.znaturforsch.com · D NNC_3_4_2009.indbC_3_4_2009.indb 267267 004.05.20094.05.2009 111:08:231:08:23 268 V. Bu¯da et al. · Attractant for Fly Species (MeSa). The aim of the present study was to test 166 P. rudis specimens were captured. In control the activity of MeSa for some species within the traps there were 46 and 51 fl ies of the two dip- order Diptera. teran species, respectively. The traps contained some other Diptera species as well, however, the Material and Methods catches were low and no signifi cant differences Behavioural test compared to the control were recorded. The behavioural test was conducted in a 0.5- Vinegar fl y, D. busckii Coquillett (Drosophilidae) ha greenhouse with green onions growing on ± compost-enriched ground substrate in Saka- The mean catch [(814 55) fl ies/trap] of lai, Šalcˇininkai district, Lithuania in September vinegar fl ies in MeSa-baited traps signifi cantly ± 2006. differed from that in control traps [(12 4) Sticky yellow cards [Biobest N.V., Westerlo, Bel- fl ies/trap], p = 0.02. The yellow colour itself at- gium (Bug Scan, 20 × 10 cm in size)] were used. tracted the fl ies as proved by catches in the In the central part of the card a 2-ml plastic vial control traps. However, the application of MeSa was fi xed in a hole which has been cut at a height enhanced the attractiveness of the traps signifi - of ~2 cm above the centre of the card. The vials cantly (Fig. 2). were plugged with cotton wool. Such sticky traps There is very little known on chemical com- were fi xed vertically to wire poles at a height of pounds affecting the D. busckii behaviour. Two ~2 m above the ground. They were either baited compounds [(S)-2-pentadecyl acetate and 2-pen- with 0.25 ml of MeSa (Fig. 1) (purity ≥99%; Carl tadecanone] are reported to trigger an aggrega- Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) or unbaited tion reaction of the fl ies. These compounds were (control). The traps were placed randomly in extracted from the ejaculatory bulb of males of three rows with 15 m distance in between. Four this species and were attributed to aggregation replicates were conducted. The traps were collect- pheromones (Schaner et al., 1989). ed after a 14-d period, and trapped insects were D. busckii like most vinegar fl ies, is attracted identifi ed and counted. to various rotting vegetable materials (vegetables and fruit in particular), abundant in bacteria and Species identifi cation yeasts. When fl ying from one rotting object to another, adults transmit rot-causing microorgan- The trapped specimens were identifi ed follow- isms. Thus, although vinegar fl ies are sapropha- ing the key of Shtakelberg (1970) for Drosophili- gous, they can cause considerable damage by dae and Grunin (1970) for Calliphoridae. spreading the rot. It was demonstrated, that D. busckii transmits, to high extent, fruit rot caused Statistical analysis by the fungus Aspergillus niger thus non-insecti- Catches were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis cide measures are searched for the control of the ANOVA test by ranks using the software Statis- tica 5.0 (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995). Results and Discussion Numerous catches of the dipteran species were recorded in yellow sticky MeSa-baited traps in the greenhouse. A total of 3255 D. busckii and Fig. 2. Mean captures of D. busckii in yellow sticky traps baited with and without (control) methyl salicylate (MeSa). Values marked by different numbers of aster- Fig. 1. Chemical structure of methyl salicylate (MeSa). isks differ signifi cantly. NNC_3_4_2009.indbC_3_4_2009.indb 268268 004.05.20094.05.2009 111:08:231:08:23 V. Bu¯da et al. · Attractant for Fly Species 269 fl ies with the aim to reduce a spread of the rot (Saxena and Saxena, 1990). It was demonstrated that D. busckii can be a vector of the bacterium Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (Boers, 1997, after van der Sommen et al., 2000) which induces soft rot in chicory. Therefore D. busckii is considered a pest in commercial plantations of chicory, and insecticides are used to control it. It is known that D. busckii colonizes rotting oranges later than other species of Drosophila, larvae of which feed on the same resources and Fig. 3. Mean captures of P. rudis in yellow sticky traps form a guild coexisting on the same food source baited with and without (control) methyl salicylate (Nunney, 1996). This means that vinegar fl ies of (MeSa). Values marked by different numbers of aster- this species are potentially more dangerous trans- isks differ signifi cantly. mitters of pathogenic microorganisms than other Drosophila species. As the lifespan of adults is quite long, they Based on data on the D. busckii behaviour, undoubtedly need some food. P. rudis has been one can conclude that the fl ies are likely to be at- often recorded on fl owers of Asclepias syriaca tracted to compounds released by bacteria, yeasts, trapped by pollinium (Frost, 1965). Also it is es- fungi or rotting plant substrate. It is known that tablished that P. rudis is an important pollinator MeSa is an important fl avour constituent of many of the Mediterranean weed Vincetoxicum nigrum fruits (e.g. Goff and Klee, 2006) and some plants (Asclepiadaceae) (Lumer and Yost, 1995). Flow- when they are damaged by bacteria or fungi (Car- ers of many plants emit MeSa as the common doza et al., 2002; Cardoza and Tumlinson, 2006). compound of fl oral scent (Knudsen et al., 2006). Thus, we assume that MeSa can be attributed to Since MeSa is a widespread fl owers’ compound, kairomone attractants for this species.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution, Diversity, and Host Associations of Rhabdoviruses Ben Longdon,1,* Gemma G
    Virus Evolution, 2015, 1(1): vev014 doi: 10.1093/ve/vev014 Research article The evolution, diversity, and host associations of rhabdoviruses Ben Longdon,1,* Gemma G. R. Murray,1 William J. Palmer,1 Jonathan P. Day,1 Darren J Parker,2,3 John J. Welch,1 Darren J. Obbard4 and Francis M. Jiggins1 1 2 Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, School of Biology, University of Downloaded from St Andrews, St Andrews, KY19 9ST, UK, 3Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyva¨skyla¨, Jyva¨skyla¨, Finland and 4Institute of Evolutionary Biology, and Centre for Immunity Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] http://ve.oxfordjournals.org/ Abstract Metagenomic studies are leading to the discovery of a hidden diversity of RNA viruses. These new viruses are poorly characterized and new approaches are needed predict the host species these viruses pose a risk to. The rhabdoviruses are a diverse family of RNA viruses that includes important pathogens of humans, animals, and plants. We have discovered thirty-two new rhabdoviruses through a combination of our own RNA sequencing of insects and searching public sequence databases. Combining these with previously known sequences we reconstructed the phylogeny of 195 rhabdovirus by guest on December 14, 2015 sequences, and produced the most in depth analysis of the family to date. In most cases we know nothing about the biology of the viruses beyond the host they were identified from, but our dataset provides a powerful phylogenetic approach to predict which are vector-borne viruses and which are specific to vertebrates or arthropods.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Systematic Entomology (1987) 12, 475-502 The taxonomy of th e Polleniø rudis species'group in the Holarctic Region (Diptera: Calliphoridae) KNUT ROGNES HavØrnbrautene 7a,Madla, Norway ABSTRACT. A rudis species-group is defined withrn Pollenia Robineau- Desvoidy, and new characters found useful in the taxonomy of this genus are presented . P.rudis (Fabricius) , P.angustigena Wainwright, stat.rev. and P.pseudorudis Rognes are redescribed . P.hungarica sP.tr., p.longithecasp.n. and P.luteovillosasp.n. are described as new to science. A key is provided, and the terminalia of both sexes are illustrated for all the species. Some features of the puparia are figured for the species where these are known. A neotype is designated for Musca rudis, and a lectotype for P. angustigena. P.angustigena, P.pseudorudis and P.rudi§ are Holarc- tic species, and the latter two have also been found in New Zealand. The remaining species are confined to the western Palaearctic . P.hungarica rs known from central Europe, including southern parts of Scandinavia, p.longitheca from the eastern Mediterranestr, and P.luteovillosa from Algeria and Morocco in North Africa. In the larval stages P.rudis-group members are parasites of or predators on earthworms. The species have several generations each year, and normally overwinter as adults . Eisenia rosea (Savigny) serves as a host for P.hungarica, P.pseudorudis and p.rudis according to the reared material available. A previous detailed account of the immature stages and life-cycle of 'rudis' from North America is tentatively assigned to pseudorudis. Keitin's (1909,7915) often cited accounts of the immature stages and life-cycle of a species called 'rudis' are rejected as a source of information for any member of the rudis group.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornell University Official Publication
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY OFFICIAL PUBLICATION Volume XXVIII Number 15 Announcement of The Graduate School for 1937-38 Ithaca, New York Published by the University March 15, 1937 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION Livingston Farrand, A.B., M.D., L.H.D., LL.D., President of the University. Edmund Ezra Day, S.B., A.M., Ph.D., LL.D., President-elect of the University. Albert Russell Mann, A.M., D.Sc, D.Agr. LL.D., Provost of the University. Floyd Karker Richtmyer, A.B., Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate School. SECRETARY OF THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL Professor Benton Sullivan Monroe, Ph.D. GENERAL COMMITTEE OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL 1936-37 Professor G. H. Sabine, at large, term expires 1038, Professor J. R. Johnson, at large, 1938. Professor W. A. Hurwitz, at large, 1937. Professor O. F. Curtis, at large, 1939. Professor C. L. Durham, Group A (Languages and Literatures), 1939. Professor J. P. Bretz, Group B (History, Political Science, Philosophy, Psychol Farm Rural 1938. ogy, Agricultural Economics, Management, Sociology) , Professor C. C. Murdock, Group C (Mathematics, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Physical Geography, Geodesy), 1938. Professor L. M. Massey, Group D (Biological Sciences), 1937. Professor G. B. Upton, Group E (Engineering, Architecture, Applied Physical Sciences, Rural Engineering, Landscape Design), 1939. Professor C. V. Morrill, Group F (Science Departments of the Cornell University Medical College in New York City), 1937. Professor P. F. Sharp, Group G (Agricultural Sciences), 1937. Professor G. J. Thompson, Group H (Law), 1938. Professor T. H. Eaton, Group I (Education), 1939. The Secretary of the Faculty. The Dean, Chairman ex officio.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Review of the United States Forest Service
    SCIENCE REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND MANAGEMENT Summary Report 1255 23 rd Street, NW, Suite 275 Washington, DC 20037 http://www.resolv.org Tel 202-965-6381 | Fax 202-338-1264 [email protected] April 2011 SCIENCE REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND MANAGEMENT Summary Report Science Reviewers*: Dr. John P. Hayes, University of Florida Dr. Alan T. Herlihy, Oregon State University Dr. Robert B. Jackson, Duke University Dr. Glenn P. Juday , University of Alaska Dr. William S. Keeton, University of Vermont Dr. Jessica E. Leahy , University of Maine Dr. Barry R. Noon, Colorado State University * Order of authors is alphabetical by last name RESOLVE Staff: Dr. Steven P. Courtney (Project Lead) Debbie Y. Lee Cover photo courtesy of Urban (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Muir_Wood10.JPG). is a non-partisan organization that serves as a neutral, third-party in policy decision-making. One of RESOLVE’s specialties is helping incorporate technical and scientific expertise into policy decisions. Headquartered in Washington, DC, RESOLVE works nationally and internationally on environmental, natural resource, energy, health, and land use planning issues. Visit http://www.resolv.org for more details. Contact RESOLVE at [email protected] . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Forest Service asked RESOLVE to coordinate an external science review of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for National Forest System Land Management Planning. The basic charge of the review process was to ‘evaluate how well the proposed planning rule Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) considers the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • General Pest Management: a Guide for Commercial Applicators, Category 7A, and Return It to the Pesticide Education Program Office, Michigan State University Extension
    General Pest Management A Guide for Commercial Applicators Extension Bulletin E -2048 • October 1998, Major revision-destroy old stock • Michigan State University Extension General Pest Management A Guide for Commercial Applicators Category 7A Editor: Carolyn Randall Extension Associate Pesticide Education Program Michigan State University Technical Consultants: Melvin Poplar, Program Manager John Haslem Insect and Rodent Management Pest Management Supervisor Michigan Department of Agriculture Michigan State University Adapted from Urban Integrated Pest Management, A Guide for Commercial Applicators, written by Dr. Eugene Wood, Dept. of Entomology, University of Maryland; and Lawrence Pinto, Pinto & Associates; edited by Jann Cox, DUAL & Associates, Inc. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Certification and Training Branch by DUAL & Associates, Arlington, Va., February 1991. General Pest Management i Preface Acknowledgements We acknowledge the main source of information for Natural History Survey for the picture of a mole (Figure this manual, the EPA manual Urban Integrated Pest 19.8). Management, from which most of the information on structure-infesting and invading pests, and vertebrates We acknowledge numerous reviewers of the manu- was taken. script including Mark Sheperdigian of Rose Exterminator Co., Bob England of Terminix, Jerry Hatch of Eradico We also acknowledge the technical assistance of Mel Services Inc., David Laughlin of Aardvark Pest Control, Poplar, Program Manager for the Michigan Department Ted Bruesch of LiphaTech, Val Smitter of Smitter Pest of Agriculture’s (MDA) Insect and Rodent Management Control, Dan Lyden of Eradico Services Inc., Tim Regal of and John Haslem, Pest Management Supervisor at Orkin Exterminators, Kevin Clark of Clarks Critter Michigan State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    materialize out of nowhere, crawl on the walls, The Outside Story and drive us to distraction by hurling themselves against windows. They’re annoying, but in fairness, their sins as pests are mild; they don’t bite, don’t sting, and despite some rumors, they aren’t vectors for swine flu or other dread diseases. They do fall in coffee mugs, which is hard to forgive. Until relatively recently, the cluster fly was believed to be one species, Pollenia rudis. In fact, “the” cluster fly, isn’t. In eastern North America, we are blessed with at least six species. Physical differences are slight, involving variations in “anterodorsal tibial setal sockets” and other minutiae. Life cycle differences – where they lay their eggs, what they eat, which flavor coffee they prefer for bathing – are not well documented. So, for example, it may be that not all cluster fly species invade human structures. Cluster Flies With that disclaimer, here’s a rough biography By: Elise Tillinghast of these unwelcome winter companions. From early spring through autumn, the flies are frequent, little-noticed visitors to gardens and So here’s my movie concept: during a meadows. They’re common pollinators; for laboratory accident, a scientist exchanges his example, in one study, researchers identified DNA with a fly. Over the next few weeks, our them among the many flying insects that can hero slowly shrinks in size and transforms into aid in the reproduction of strawberry plants. an insect with black spiky body hair, maroon eyes, and translucent, buzzing wings. During the warm months, they cycle through several generations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Biology, Dispersal, and Management of the House Fly and Related Flies for Farmers, Municipalities, and Public Health Offi Cials 3
    The Fly Management Handbook A Guide to Biology, Dispersal, Connecticut and Management of the House Agricultural Fly and Related Flies for Experiment Farmers, Municipalities, and Station, Public Health Offi cials New Haven Bulletin 1013 KIRBY C. STAFFORD III, PH.D. Vice Director, State Entomologist May 2008 The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven, CT 06504 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are given to Joyce Meader, Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service, Dr. Bruce Sherman, Connecticut Department of Agriculture, Patricia M. Beckenhaupt, Director of Health of the Northeast District Department of Health, and Dr. Louis A. Magnarelli, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (CAES), for reviewing the handbook. Their comments and suggestions were sincerely appreciated. I extend a particular thank you to James Rock (emeritus), Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service, for his considerable input and support. Thanks are also extended to Rose Bonito (CAES) for scanning illustrations and pictures and Vickie Bomba-Lewandoski (CAES) for publication and printing assistance. Much of the material on cluster flies is from a CAES fact sheet by Gale E. Ridge (available on the CAES website, www.ct.gov/caes). Thank you, Gale. Several portions on poultry IPM are based on Special Circular 338, Poultry Pest Management for Pennsylvania and the Northeast (1986), by Kirby C. Stafford III and Clarence A. Collison. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR FIGURES Most sources for the pictures and illustrations are noted in the figure captions. Requests for use of photographs and illustrations by the author or CAES may be directed to the author. Permission to use any other material must be obtained from the original source. The historical 1916 illustration of the unsanitary conditions in the introduction is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Image Library (8264); the stable fly and green-bottle fly in Figure 6 and 8, respectively, are from United States Department of Agriculture Farmer’s Bulletin 1408.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Screening Assessment for Aspergillus Awamori ATCC 22342 (=A
    Draft Screening Assessment for Aspergillus awamori ATCC 22342 (=A. niger ATCC 22342) and Aspergillus brasiliensis ATCC 9642 Environment Canada Health Canada June 2014 Draft Screening Assessment A. awamori ATCC 22342 (=A. niger ATCC 22342) and A. brasiliensis ATCC 9642 Synopsis Pursuant to paragraph 74(b) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), the Ministers of Environment and of Health have conducted a screening assessment of two micro-organism strains: Aspergillus awamori (ATCC 22342) (also referred to as Aspergillus niger ATCC 22342) and Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC 9642).These strains were added to the Domestic Substances List (DSL) under subsection 105(1) of CEPA 1999 because they were manufactured in or imported into Canada between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1986 and entered or were released into the environment without being subject to conditions under CEPA 1999 or any other federal or provincial legislation. Recent publications have demonstrated that the DSL strain ATCC 22342 is a strain of A. niger and not A. awamori. However, both names are still being used. Therefore, in this report we will use the name “A. awamori ATCC 22342 (=A. niger ATCC 22342)”. The A. niger group is generally considered to be ubiquitous in nature, and is able to adapt to and thrive in many aquatic and terrestrial niches; it is common in house dust. A. brasiliensis is relatively a rarely occurring species; it has been known to occur in soil and occasionally found on grape berries. These two species form conidia that permit survival under sub-optimal environmental conditions. A. awamori ATCC 22342 (=A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Pollenia Rudis and It's Host Earthworms
    1'RE fi_COLOGY OF POLLE'NI4. RUOIS AtJD IT'S HOS'f" EAR'fH\ICJRl"iS ... ' "Vlords fail to describe their general depravity; it is beyond expression. If you wish to be happy. be sure you don't introduce cluster flies into your family." Dall; 1882. THE ECOLOGY OF POLLENIA RUDIS (DIPTERA:CALLIPHORIDAE) AND ITS HOST EARTHWORMS (LUMBRICIDAE), WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE HOST-PARASITE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN P. RUDIS AND EISENIA ROSEA by ALAN JOHN THOMSON, B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for• the degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University May 1972 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1972) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Biology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The ecology of Pollenia rudis (Diptera:Calliphoridae) and its host earthworms (Lumbricidae), with special reference to the host-parasite relationship between P. rudis and Eisenia rosea. AUTHOR: Alan John Thomson, B.Sc. (Glasgow University, Scotland) SUPERVISOR: Professor D. M. Davies NUMBER OF PAGES: (vii) 170 SCOPE AND CONTENTS: The distribution of Eisenia rosea, the main host of P. rudis, is influenced mainly by soil moisture and bulk density. Cluster-fly larvae locate hosts by random locomotion through the soil pores, whereupon penetration is induced by a substance present in the worm slime. Penetration occurs mainly on the upper surface of the worm, with fewer penetrations occurring towards either end of the worm. Several species of earthworm, including some which do not normally act as hosts, were infected in the laboratory. The encystment, surface casting, burrowing and autotomising behaviour of E. rosea varies with soil moisture and bulk density.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histology of the Digestive Tract of the Cluster Fly, Pollenia Rudis
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 48 Annual Issue Article 112 1941 The Histology of the Digestive Tract of the Cluster Fly, Pollenia rudis David T. Jones Iowa State College Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1941 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Jones, David T. (1941) "The Histology of the Digestive Tract of the Cluster Fly, Pollenia rudis," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 48(1), 407-415. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol48/iss1/112 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jones: The Histology of the Digestive Tract of the Cluster Fly, Pollenia THE HISTOLOGY OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT OF THE CLUSTER FLY, POLLEN/A RUDIS DAVID T. JoNEs Pollenia rudis (Fabricius), the cluster fly, is a common house­ hold pest in Iowa in the fall, winter, and early spring. This house fly is readily distinguished from Musca domestica L. by its thora­ cic pubescence of fine crinkled golden hairs, its sluggish, almost tame habits, and its parasitizing woodland earthworms of the genus Helodrilus (De Coursey 1927) instead of breeding in horse manure. The flies were readily available indoors at Ames through­ out the winter, as they emerged a few at a time from hibernation in window crevices, from moldings, and from behind furniture.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Key to British Blowflies (Calliphoridae) And
    Draft key to British Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae Steven Falk 2016 BRITISH BLOWFLIES (CALLIPHORIDAE) AND WOODLOUSE FLIES (RHINOPHORIDAE) DRAFT KEY March 2016 Steven Falk Feedback to [email protected] 1 Draft key to British Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae Steven Falk 2016 PREFACE This informal publication attempts to update the resources currently available for identifying the families Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae. Prior to this, British dipterists have struggled because unless you have a copy of the Fauna Ent. Scand. volume for blowflies (Rognes, 1991), you will have been largely reliant on Van Emden's 1954 RES Handbook, which does not include all the British species (notably the common Pollenia pediculata), has very outdated nomenclature, and very outdated classification - with several calliphorids and tachinids placed within the Rhinophoridae and Eurychaeta palpalis placed in the Sarcophagidae. As well as updating keys, I have also taken the opportunity to produce new species accounts which summarise what I know of each species and act as an invitation and challenge to others to update, correct or clarify what I have written. As a result of my recent experience of producing an attractive and fairly user-friendly new guide to British bees, I have tried to replicate that approach here, incorporating lots of photos and clear, conveniently positioned diagrams. Presentation of identification literature can have a big impact on the popularity of an insect group and the accuracy of the records that result. Calliphorids and rhinophorids are fascinating flies, sometimes of considerable economic and medicinal value and deserve to be well recorded. What is more, many gaps still remain in our knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Life of the Vagabond Cluster Fly by Matt Bowser
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 17, No. 49 • December 4, 2015 The mysterious life of the vagabond cluster fly by Matt Bowser A male cluster fly suns on the siding of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge headquarters building, March 23,2015 (http://bit.ly/1IFhfuB). Last February through March as our snow melted first North American record of this species on theEast away, some of early spring’s most precocious inverte- Coast in 1958, it has spread west to British Columbia brates pranced in the sunshine, warming themselves and now southcentral Alaska. on south-facing wood siding of the Kenai National Cluster flies get their name from their habit of Wildlife Refuge’s headquarters building. Intermin- gathering in dense aggregations in and on man-made gling among the usual metallic green and blue flesh structures from late fall to early spring, where they flies that typically awake in the early spring were can be a serious nuisance simply because there are so many large, dark flies having a golden wooliness. many of them. Pest control techs can do a brisk busi- These were cluster flies (genus Pollenia), a kind of fly ness in response to sometimes remarkable numbers of that had not previously been found in Alaska (article: flies reminiscent of the Biblical plagues. Now youcan http://bit.ly/1Q1iPyA). even buy Cluster Buster™ traps specifically designed Worldwide, there are 196 species of cluster flies ac- to trap and kill these flies. cording to the Catalogue of Life, all of them native to Thankfully, cluster flies really are no more thana the Old World.
    [Show full text]