10 Hlffieare

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10 Hlffieare 10 Hlffieare T A |illiam Shakespeare was christened on Wednesday, l/ \/ April 26, 1564, in the town of Stratford-on-Avon, Y Y some 90 miles northwest of London. On November 27,1582, at age eighteen he obtained a license to marry Anne Whateley of nearby Temple Graftory but a bond for 40 pounds the next day names the bride as Anne Hathaway of Stratford. She was probably Agnes Hathaway, the daughter of Richard Hathaway, who was buried the previous September and who left her a dowry of twenty nobles. From the gravestone of Shakespeare's wife we know that she was born in 1556 and so was eight years older than her husband. Her first child, Susanna, was christened on May 26 of 1583, so that she was already with child at the time of her marriage. Two years later, in February 1585 she gave birth to twins, a boy and a girf named Hamnet and Judith Shakespeare. At the time of his marriage William Shakespeare's father was a poor man, and William himself was not much better off. His wife's marriage portiory about eight thousand dollars in today's money, was probably a factor in his decision to marry. So, at age 20, Shakespeare already had a wife and three children to support. This is the man that Greene called 153 1.54 g Louis Ule "Shakescene" in Green's Groatsworth of Wit, the famous actor and playwright of that name. ln Groatsworth of Wif Greene provided us with a wealth of information, not all of it flattering, about Shakespeare. The pamphlet is therefore often dismissed as the report of an envi- ous man. But it was not in Greene's nafure to be envious. Nashe did once accuse him of lyitrA calling his Groatsutorth a "scald lying trivial pamphlet," but he was then defending himself from the chaige of authorship, as well as rising to the defense of Marlowe after Greene, urging him to repentance, had exposed him as an atheist. The dates of events in the life of Shakespeare mentioned in Groatsworth of Wit, depend on the date of the first meeting between Greene and Shakespeare. It could not have been later than the year 1591 and, if so, based on Greene's statement that Shakespeare "for seven years space was absolute Inter- preter to the puppets," we see that Shakespeare was no more than twenty years old when he was already a performer. Greene tumed to writing plays only after meeting William Shakespeare. Greene speaks of writing aplay, very likely Al- phonsus, King of Aragon, in 1588, hence his meeting with Shakespeare took place during this year or before. Seven years before theo in L581, Shakespeare, at age 17,began his career as a puppeteer. A William Shakeshafte, usually thought to be Shakespeare, is mentioned as an unemployed actor in Lanca- shire in a will dated 3 August 1581. Puppeteering would be excellent preparation for a career on the stage. To maintain steady employment Shakespeare would have found it neces- sary to travel, to acquire a stock of puppets and dramatic material, to advertise his perforrnances, to rent stalls at coun- try fairs and to hire assistants. Shakespeare's circuit seems to have been north of Stratford- on-Avon: Leigh in Lancashire (where Shakeshafte is men- tioned), nearby Manchester (suggested by the ballad, Fair Em, the Miller's Daughter of Manchester, wlich Shakespeare di- rected Robert Wilson to use as a plot for Fair Em) and Coven- try (from Greene's allusion n Qutp to Shakespeare wearing a Coventry hat). Shakespeare essentially put on a one-man show, one that did not require a script and which relied on improvisation and the burlesque of popular ballads. He would entertain by reciting extemporaneous verse, as did Robert Wilsoru and it was probably Wilson, Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe (1. 564-L 607 ) g 155 Tarleton that Marlowe had in mind when he wrote of "riming mother-wits." Shakespeare's account to Greene of his early hardships agrees with what we know of him at the time of his marriage: "What though the world once went hard with me, when I was fain to carry my playing fardle a-footback; Tempora mu- tantur..." That is, when he first started puppeteering, he could not afford to ride but had to carry his equipment from town to town on his back. But, as he says, "temport mutlntur," times change, and he now estimates his net worth at f,200. At the time of his meeting with Greene, this whole wealth was his "very share in playing apparel". Shakespeare's early financial success was not due as much to his income from puppeteering or from acting, as in acting as broker for costumes after the run of a play. During a plague Shakespeare could acquire these for a fraction of their cost if any monthly interest pay- ment was missed. Shakespeare may have had a direct financial motive in writ- ing plays or commissioning them to be written. Playing ap- parel must be stored and protected from moths, weather, rats, and theft. It depreciates as an investment and brings no inter- est. Should a play fold and the actors sell ou! it would be- hoove Shakespeare to procure another play that could use his old costumes. Most actors had little interest in retaining possession of their playing apparel but Shakespeare, with his experience as a puppeteer, would be in the habit of keeping them and know also that it is just a matter of time before they could be used again. It would be cheaper for him to create dramatic material to fit the properties at hand, than to con- stantly change puppets and costumes. We conclude that at an early age Shakespeare made his living as a puppeteer. His financial activities, of which we have some records, were a nafural outgrowth of his theatrical contacts. It would be natural for him to expand his theatrical pawn-broking to make loans of money to people other than actors. Thus, William Shakespeare sued one John Clayton in Cheapside for seven pounds he lent him in May 1592. Shake- speare also bought plays and acted in plays written by other writers, and the explanation is that Shakespeare early realized that it takes more than costumes and actors to put on a paying performance. He accordingly treated playbooks as a capital investment.Th"y were his and they earned money. According 156 ? Louis Ule to Greene, Shakespeare was in the habit of employing scholars to write plays and readily admitted that actors " getby schol- ars their whole living." Shakespeare was himself a writer, for he tells Greene: "I was a country Author, passing at a moral" and he gives the names of two of them: The Moral of Man's Wit, and The Dia- logue of Diaes. Shakespeare boasts to Greene, "fot'twas I that penned them," implying that Greene may have seen them acted. When Greene describes Shakespeare as having an ungra- cious voice, Shakespeare takes exception and lists the roles he had played and ior which he was as famous as any actor of his time. These roles were, as Greene remembered them: Delphrigus, in an unnamed play; the King of the Fairies, in an unnamed play; a role in The Twelae Labors of Hercules, a play; and the devil in three scenes of the play Highway to Heaaen The role of Delphrigus is mentioned by Thomas Nashe in his preface to Greene's Menaphon: Sundry other sweet Gentlemen I do know, that have vaunted their pens in private devices and tricked up a com- pany of taffeta fools with their feathers whose beauty, if our Poets had not peecte (tricked up) with the supply of their periwigs, they might have anticked it until this time up and down the country with the King of Fairies, and dined every day at the pease porridge ordinary with Delphrigus. Nashe is saying that if sundry sweet Gentlemery such as Robert Greene, did not write plays for the actors they would still be playing The King of the Fairies and eating at the cheapest ordinaries (restaurants) with the actor, William Shakespeare, who played Delphrigus. Shakespeare further tells Greene that he can "serve to make a pretty speech," and, after delivering two lines of doggerel he asks him: "Was not this pretty for a plain rime extempore?" Imprecise caricature rather than devastating precision might better describe Greene's version of these lines, but we may conclude, in any case, that Shakespeare considered himself an able actor, speaker and extemporaneous poet. Greene does not belittle Shakespeare's knowledge of Latin, Christopher Marlowe (1 564-L 607 ) g 1.57 but rather shows Shakespeare respectful of Greene's univer- sity education by his diffidence in using a common Latin ex- pression: tempora mutantur. But Shakespeare's un-self- concious use of the expression ex tempore shbws that he had used it often before in connection with his act. The windmill in Greene's Groatsworth wlich Shakespeare hoped to buy may be explained by the fact that William Shakespeare was a retailer of corn and malt. Greene says that Shakespeare "lodged him at the Town's end in a house of retail." It was probably Shakespeare's place of business where he stored his grain, playing apparel and other pawns, and where he put Greene up for the night while he himself went to better lodgings. Outside Bishopsgate in Fynnesburie Field there were several windmills for grinding corn which may have led Shakespeare to think of expanding his grain business by becoming a miller.
Recommended publications
  • The Relationship of the Dramatic Works of John Lyly to Later Elizabethan Comedies
    Durham E-Theses The relationship of the dramatic works of John Lyly to later Elizabethan comedies Gilbert, Christopher G. How to cite: Gilbert, Christopher G. (1965) The relationship of the dramatic works of John Lyly to later Elizabethan comedies, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9816/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE RELATIONSHIP OP THE DRAMATIC WORKS OP JOHN LYLY TO LATER ELIZABETHAN COMEDIES A Thesis Submitted in candidature for the degree of Master of Arts of the University of Durham by Christopher G. Gilbert 1965 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. DECLARATION I declare this work is the result of my independent investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Spain in Early Modern English Drama
    Saugata Bhaduri Polycolonial Angst: Representations of Spain in Early Modern English Drama One of the important questions that this conference1 requires us to explore is how Spain was represented in early modern English theatre, and to examine such representation especially against the backdrop of the emergence of these two nations as arguably the most important players in the unfolding game of global imperialism. This is precisely what this article proposes to do: to take up representative English plays of the period belonging to the Anglo-Spanish War (1585–1604) which do mention Spain, analyse what the nature of their treat- ment of Spain is and hypothesise as to what may have been the reasons behind such a treatment.2 Given that England and Spain were at bitter war during these twenty years, and given furthermore that these two nations were the most prominent rivals in the global carving of the colonial pie that had already begun during this period, the commonsensical expectation from such plays, about the way Spain would be represented in them, should be of unambiguous Hispanophobia. There were several contextual reasons to occasion widespread Hispanophobia in the period. While Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon (1509) and its subsequent annulment (1533) had already sufficiently complicated Anglo-Hispanic relations, and their daughter Queen Mary I’s marriage to Philip II of Spain (1554) and his subsequent becoming the King of England and Ireland further aggravated the 1 The conference referred to here is the International Conference on Theatre Cultures within Globalizing Empires: Looking at Early Modern England and Spain, organised by the ERC Project “Early Modern European Drama and the Cultural Net (DramaNet),” at the Freie Universität, Ber- lin, November 15–16, 2012, where the preliminary version of this article was presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Telltale women the dramaturgy of female characters in Shakespeare's history plays Bachrach, Hailey Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Bachrach 1 TELLTALE WOMEN The Dramaturgy of Female Characters in Shakespeare’s History Plays By Hailey Bachrach Submitted to King’s College London English Department in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 30 September 2020 Bachrach 2 Abstract .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    introduction Romance is a twilight zone in studies of late sixteenth-century literary genres in England. Half-way between the nostalgia of medieval chivalry and the enterprising spirit of early modern exploration, piracy and com- merce as preludes to a future empire, it is both very old-fashioned and innovatively modern. Appearing in narrative as well as in dramatic forms, romance lays simultaneous claims to history and imagination, which were not necessarily in opposition in the period, and caters for a readership of servants and citizens while equally fi nding its way into Spenserian epic, Sidneyan pastoral or even late Shakespearian tragicomedy and Miltonian poetry. The three plays grouped in this volume are early modern attempts at conquering that twilight zone in a context of expanding contacts with Muslim lands around the Mediterranean. romance and conquest in early modern england ‘The structural core of all fi ction’ for Northrop Frye, who sees it as a means to translate mythical archetypes into human experience, 1 romance is also ‘a notoriously slippery category’, as Barbara Fuchs warns. 2 The basic defi nition with which Helen Cooper starts her authoritative study of the genre is a primarily narrative fi ction in the vernacular which appears from the twelfth century onward, characterised by exotic settings, distant in time and/or place, concerned with love and/or chivalry, and involving high-ranking individuals engaged in some ideal quest. It may include such recurrent patterns as encounters with the supernatural, obscured identities or miraculous conversions. 3 Patricia Parker’s earlier deconstructionist approach complicates this defi nition by insisting on the proliferating digressions which form the structure of romance and defer its closure and collective coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winter's Tale by William Shakespeare
    EDUCATION PACK The Winter’s Tale by William Shakespeare 1 Contents Page Synopsis 3 William Shakespeare 4 Assistant Directing 6 Cue Script Exercise 8 Cue Scripts 9-14 Source of the Story 15 Interview with Simon Scardifield 16 Doubling decisions 17 Propeller 18 2 Synopsis Leontes, the King of Sicilia, asks his dearest friend from childhood, Polixenes, the King of Bohemia, to extend his visit. Polixenes has not been home to his wife and young son for more than nine months but Leontes’ wife, Hermione, who is heavily pregnant, finally convinces her husband's friend to stay a bit longer. As they talk apart, Leontes thinks that he observes Hermione’s behaviour becoming too intimate with his friend, for as soon as they leave his sight he is imagining them "leaning cheek to cheek, meeting noses, kissing with inside lip." He orders one of his courtiers, Camillo, to stand as cupbearer to Polixenes and poison him as soon as he can. Camillo cannot believe that Hermione is unfaithful and informs Polixenes of the plot. He escapes with Polixenes to Bohemia. Leontes, discovering that they have fled, now believes that Camillo knew of the imagined affair and was plotting against him with Polixenes. He accuses Hermione of adultery, takes Mamillius, their son, from her and throws her in jail. He sends Cleomines and Dion to Apollo’s Oracle at Delphi, for an answer to his charges. While Hermione is in jail her daughter is born, and Paulina, her friend, takes the baby girl to Leontes in the hope that the sight of his infant daughter will soften his heart.
    [Show full text]
  • CYMBELINE" in the Fllii^Slhi TI CENTURY
    "CYMBELINE" IN THE fllii^SLHi TI CENTURY Bennett Jackson Submitted in partial fulfilment for the de ree of uaster of Arts in the University of Birmingham. October 1971. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis consists of an Introduction, followed by Part I (chapters 1-2) in which nineteenth- century criticism of the play is discussed, particular attention being paid to Helen Faucit's essay on Imogen, and its relationship to her playing of the role. In Part II the stags-history of Oymbcline in London is traced from 1785 to Irving's Lyceum production of 1896. Directions from promptbooks used by G-.P. Cooke, W.C. Macready, Helen Eaucit, and Samuel ±helps are transcribed and discussed, and in the last chapter the influence of Bernard Shaw on Ellen Terry's Imogen is considered in the light of their correspondence and the actress's rehearsal copies of the play. There are three appendices: a list of performances; transcriptions of two newspaper reviews (from 1843 and 1864) and one private diary (Gordon Crosse's notes on the Lyceum Gymbeline); and discussion of one of the promptbooks prepared for Charles Kean's projected production.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration
    Kyd and Shakespeare: Authorship, Influence, and Collaboration Darren Anthony Freebury-Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff University 2016 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to establish the canon of Thomas Kyd’s plays and to explore Shakespeare’s relationship with that oeuvre. Chapter One begins by examining Shakespeare’s verbal indebtedness to plays that have been attributed to Kyd for over two centuries, including The Spanish Tragedy (1587), Soliman and Perseda (1588), and The True Chronicle History of King Leir (1589). The first chapter argues that Shakespeare’s extensive knowledge of Kyd’s plays contributed towards the development of his dramatic language. The second chapter provides an overview of some of the complex methods for identifying authors utilized throughout the thesis. Chapter Three then seeks to establish a fuller account of Kyd’s dramatic canon through a variety of authorship tests, arguing that in addition to the three plays above Arden of Faversham (1590), Fair Em (1590), and Cornelia (1594) should be attributed to Kyd as sole authored texts. The fourth chapter examines the internal evidence for Kyd’s hand in Shakespeare’s Henry VI Part One (1592). The chapter contends that Shakespeare’s chronicle history play was originally written by Kyd and Thomas Nashe for the Lord Strange’s Men, and that Shakespeare subsequently added three scenes for the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The fifth chapter argues that Shakespeare and Kyd collaborated on The Reign of King Edward III (1593) and that Kyd should thus be recognized as one of Shakespeare’s earliest co-authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Quarto of King Henry V Edited by Andrew Gurr Excerpt More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521623367 - The First Quarto of King Henry V Edited by Andrew Gurr Excerpt More information 1 Introduction INTRODUCTION The significance of the quarto text of Henry V The character of the text of Henry V printed in the First Folio of 1623 (f) is not seriously in doubt. As the NCS edition and others argue, it was set from an authorial manuscript that had not been through the developmental process of emendation for performance. The version printed in 1600 (q), however, tells a different story. It contains several features that show radical corrections made to the f text either in the course of preparing the play for performance or during its first run on stage. It cuts the total number of lines by a half, eliminating entire scenes and transposing others, and shortens or cuts all the longer speeches. The speed with which it came to the press only a year after its first staging is a mark both of its proximity to the text performed by the company that owned it and of its authority as an official version. Between 1598 and 1600 ten plays owned by Shakespeare’s company came into print, seven of them Shakespeare’s own. With the sole exception of the Henry V quarto, and Jonson’s Every Man Out of his Humour, which Jonson gave to the press himself, all of them were at least three years old. In the speed of its delivery to the press, q Henry V is unique even among the so-called ‘bad’ quartos. What its text can tell us about its origins and its intended function is uniquely valuable for an understanding of what Shakespeare’s company did to adapt the play-manuscripts he sold to them for staging.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet and the Invention of Tragedy1
    Hamlet and the invention of Tragedy1 Helen Cooper UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, OXFORD The first thing that should be said about Hamlet is that he is a serial killer. He kills off a higher proportion of the speaking cast list, either directly with his own hand or indirectly, than any other Shakespearean character, including Richard III and Macbeth. To begin with, his victims include the entire Polonius family. He kills Polonius deliberately, though it is true that he believes him to be someone else at the time; but such an instance of mistaken identity, of killing B when one had set out with the intention of killing A, is not acceptable as an excuse for murder in a court of law. Laertes he kills with his own hand, though inadvertently; the text leaves open the opportunity, taken up in many productions, to have Hamlet engineer the change of swords deliberately as result of realizing that Laertes’ is unbated, but he cannot know that it is poisoned. Ophelia’s death he causes indirectly, but there can be no question but that he carries total moral responsibility for it, first tendering her affection, then proceeding through public humiliation to private violent abuse, and finally murdering her father. The First Quarto has Laertes make the double accusation of responsibility for the catastrophes to both Polonius and Ophelia explicit: Griefe upon griefe, my father murdered, My sister thus distracted: Cursed be his soule that wrought this wicked act.2 At no point, however, does Hamlet acknowledge his own role in bringing about her death, nor does he show any compunction over it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragedies: V. 2 Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE TRAGEDIES: V. 2 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK William Shakespeare,Tony Tanner | 770 pages | 07 Oct 1993 | Everyman | 9781857151640 | English | London, United Kingdom The Tragedies: v. 2 PDF Book Many people try to keep them apart, and several lose their lives. Often there are passages or characters that have the job of lightening the mood comic relief , but the overall tone of the piece is quite serious. The scant evidence makes explaining these differences largely conjectural. The play was next published in the First Folio in Distributed Presses. Officer involved with Breonna Taylor shooting says it was 'not a race thing'. Share Flipboard Email. Theater Expert. In tragedy, the focus is on the mind and inner struggle of the protagonist. Ab Urbe Condita c. The 10 Shakespeare plays generally classified as tragedy are as follows:. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved 6 January President Kennedy's sister, Rosemary Kennedy , had part of her brain removed in in a relatively new procedure known as a prefrontal lobotomy. The inclusion of comic scenes is another difference between Aristotle and Shakespearean tragedies. That is exactly what happens in Antony and Cleopatra, so we have something very different from a Greek tragedy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, , An Aristotelian Tragedy In his Poetics Aristotle outlines tragedy as follows: The protagonist is someone of high estate; a prince or a king. From the minute Bolingbroke comes into power, he destroys the faithful supporters of Richard such as Bushy, Green and the Earl of Wiltshire. Shakespearean Tragedy: Shakespearean tragedy has replaced the chorus with a comic scene. The Roman tragedies— Julius Caesar , Antony and Cleopatra and Coriolanus —are also based on historical figures , but because their source stories were foreign and ancient they are almost always classified as tragedies rather than histories.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the Shakespeare Mask: the Novelist's Choices
    Writing The Shakespeare Mask: The Novelist’s Choices Newton Frohlich *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright©2016 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The authorship of the works of Shakespeare by de Vere is depicted from when he was five to the time of his the glover from Stratford -on-Avon has been considered a tragic death, including his "favored," sexual relationship myth almost from its inception. No less than Charles Dickins, with the queen and his intimate relationship with Emilia Mark Twain, Henry and William James, Ralph Waldo Bassano, who is widely accepted as the "Dark Lady" of Emerson, Herman Melville, Walt Whitman, Royal Shake-speare's Sonnets. (There is no evidence of any Shakespeare Company actors John Gielgud, Derek Jacobi, relationship between the Stratford man and Emilia Bassano.) Jeremy Irons, and Michael York, British Prime Minister In short, while the documentary evidence of de Vere's -- or Benjamin Disraeli, five United States Supreme Court the Stratford man's -- authorship of the works of Shakespeare Justices, and thousands who signed a Declaration of Doubt is missing, the circumstantial evidence of de Vere's About Will circulating the World-Wide Web have attested to authorship is overwhelming. And as United States Supreme their doubts. In response to the request by his publisher, Court Justice John Paul Stevens puts it, "circumstantial author Newton Frohlich, commencing research connected evidence can be as persuasive as documentary evidence with a sequel to his novel about Columbus, came across especially where, as here, there's so much of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appearance of Blacks on the Early Modern Stage: Love's
    Early Theatre 17-2 (2014), 77–94 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.17.2.1206 matthieu a. chapman The Appearance of Blacks on the Early Modern Stage: Love’s Labour’s Lost’s African Connections to Court While scholarship is certain that white actors did appear in blackface on the Eliza- bethan stages, this paper argues for the additional possibility of actual moors and blacks appearing on stage in early modern London. Examining the positive social, political, and economic implications of using in performance these bodies per- ceived as exotic, I argue for the appearance of blacks in Love’s Labour’s Lost as a display of courtly power in its 1597–8 showing for Elizabeth I. Building on this precedent, Queen Anna’s staging of herself as black in the 1605 Masque of Black- ness, I argue, worked to assert the new Jacobean court’s power. In the year 1501, Spanish princess Catherine of Aragon arrived in England to marry Arthur, eldest son of Henry VII. The English greeted Catherine with much fanfare and were impressed with the pageantry of her entrance, which, as Sir Thomas More wrote, ‘thrilled the hearts of everyone’.1 In spite of the fanfare, not everything about Catherine’s entrance was entirely positive. The Spanish princess’s arrival brought not only a wife for the prince of Wales, but also attention to a confusion prevalent in English culture, the simultan- eous visibility and invisibility of blacks. Of the fifty-one members of Cath- erine of Aragon’s household to make the trip to England with her, two were black.2 Describing these individuals
    [Show full text]