Council Letter Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Council Letter Template North Area Committee - 7th February 2008 Application 1) 07/02599/FUL Numbers: 2) 07/2598/CAC Decision Due by: 14th January 2008 Proposal: 1) 07/02599/FUL Erection of replacement 2/3 storey dwelling, replacement of existing 1.7m close boarded fence with 1.7m brick wall. 2) 07/2598/CAC Conservation area consent for demolition of existing two storey dwelling and attached single storey garage. Site Address: Garford House Garford Road Oxford (Site map at appendix 1). Ward: St Margarets Ward Agent: Gray Baynes & Shew Applicant: Peregrine & Hester Riviere Application Called in – by Councillors – Campbell, Brundin, Hollander and Goddard for the following reasons – Overbearing impact Recommendation: Application be Approved For the following reasons: 1 The Council considers that the proposal accords with the policies of the development plan as summarised below. It has taken into consideration all other material matters, including matters raised in response to consultation and publicity. Any material harm that the development would otherwise give rise to can be offset by the conditions imposed. subject to the following conditions, which have been imposed for the reasons stated:- Application 07/02599/FUL 1 Development begun within time limit 2 Samples in Conservation Area 3 Revised details of dormer windows 4 Design - no additions to dwelling (i.e. permitted development rights removed) 5 Revised parking layout 6 Landscape protectin of trees shown on plan 7 No felling, lopping, cutting REPORT 8 Landscape plan required 9 Landscape by completion Application 2) 07/2598/CAC 1 Commencement of works – conservation area consent 2 Conservation area consent in accordance with approved plans 3 Building not to be demolished prior to contract for redevelopment Main Local Plan Policies: Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 CP1 - Development Proposals CP6 - Efficient Use of Land & Density CP7 - Urban Design CP8 - Design Development to Relate to its Context CP15 - Energy Efficiency TR3 - Car Parking Standards TR4 - Pedestrian & Cycle Facilities HE7 - Conservation Areas HS19 - Privacy & Amenity HS21 - Private Open Space Other Material Considerations: This application is in or affecting the North Oxford Victorian Suburb Conservation Area. Oxfordshire Structure Plan 2016 PPS3 Housing PPG15 Historic Environment Relevant Site History: 58/6680/A_H Dwelling house and garage for private car. APPROVED 22.4.58 Representations Received: 7 Representations received making the following comments: • Size, mass form height and scale of proposal is out of keeping with surrounding residential dwellings • Loss of privacy • Increased footprint • Proposal will detract from the character and appearance of the area • Proposal is out of character with the homogeneity of Garford Road and their low key scale and appearance • Proposal comes too close to boundaries with neighbours • Design is non cohesive and aims to produce as big a house a possible • Proposal will be overbearing and oppressive • Application site is on sloping ground and therefore the site is higher and will be more overbearing to neighbours • Loss of light to neighbours • Parking and access proposed to rear of plot • Hard landscaping out of character REPORT • Loss of trees • Proposal does not respect the history of the site in that the plot was part of the original Blackhall Farm Statutory and Internal Consultees: Linton Road Neighbourhood Association, Oxford Preservation Trust, no responses. Environment Agency Thames Region: No impact Thames Water Utilities Limited: No objections Tree Officer: No objections Highways Authority: Inadequate parking and turning space Issues: Principle of demolition of existing building Impact of proposed replacement on character and appearance of conservation area Impact on neighbours Highway safety Sustainability: This is an accessible location being close to good public transport services. There are also cycle lanes providing access to the City Centre. The proposal represents an efficient use of a brownfield site. Officers Assessment: Site Location and Description 1. The application site is located half a mile north of Oxford city centre, within the North Oxford Victorian Suburb Conservation Area. The site is currently occupied by Garford House which is a large detached dwelling constructed in the late 1950s. The site was formerly part of the garden of Blackhall Farm, which is located on the north east corner of Charlbury Road and Garford Road. Proposals 2. The applications propose the demolition of the existing buildings on the site and replacement with a detached dwelling of 2 storey in height with a third floor contained in the roof and lit by dormer windows. It is proposed to replace the existing fence that fronts Garford Road and replace it with a 1.7m high brick wall, with the retention of trees and shrubs behind. The existing vehicular access is retained as is the arrangement of the existing driveway to the rear of the plot. The existing garage will be removed and parking is proposed to the rear of the dwelling. Principle of Development 3. The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 requires that in the determination of planning applications special regard should be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the conservation area. This requirement is given effect in policy HE7 of the Oxford Local Plan 2001 –2016 which seeks to ensure that new development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the conservation area. REPORT 4. Government Advice in PPS3 Housing. encourages the efficient use of previously developed land in a way that protects the character of the local environment. This is core to the Housing policies in the Local Plan. 5. PPG15 Planning and the Historic Environment states that when considering applications for the demolition of buildings within a conservation area, ‘the general presumption should be in favour of retaining buildings which make a positive contribution to the character or appearance of a conservation area’. It adds that where a building makes little or no contribution then there is the opportunity for redevelopment which could add to the character or appearance of the conservation area and the loss of the existing building can be accepted. This is on the presumption that there are acceptable plans for redevelopment. 6. PPG15 states that when considering proposals for new development in conservation areas ‘special regard should be had for such matters as scale, height, form, massing, respect for the traditional pattern of frontages vertical or horizontal emphasis and detailed design (e.g. The scale and spacing of window openings, and the nature and quality of materials). What is important is not that new buildings should directly imitate earlier styles, but that they should be designed with respect for their context, as part of a larger whole which has a well-established character and appearance of its own’. The emphasis is on managing change rather than preventing all forms of new development. Analysis of conservation area 7. The Conservation Area Appraisal for North Oxford is in its final revision stages following consultation with the local community. It explains the character of this part of the conservation area east of Banbury Road and is a material consideration in the consideration of this application. 8. The development of the Bardwell Estate introduced a new architectural language to North Oxford. The influence of Wilkinson and Moore, the predominant architects of much of North Oxford up until the turn of the century, diminished and new wave architects, Frank Mountain, Arthur Martin and Christopher Wright designed in the more fashionable styles of the Arts and Crafts, Queen Anne and Neo-Georgian. This led to an eclectic mix of styles within the area where tall gothic piles gave way to broader lower buildings with hipped roofs, timber sash or casement windows, brickwork, roughcast render or timber framing, symmetrical and asymmetrical facades, with chimneys positioned to reinforce the formality or the informality of the design. Chadlington Road, Linton Road, Northmoor Road and Garford Road all exhibit these characteristics. The Existing Building 9. The existing detached house on the site was built in 1958 on part of the land belonging to Blackhall Farm. It is a design of its time, sited back from the front boundary on a generously sized plot. The house is of a scale and design that does not reflect the characteristics or appearance of the REPORT conservation area and would, if it were more visible in the road, have a negative impact on the conservation area. As it is, screened by the boundary fence and trees, its contribution could be described as neutral. There is no objection to its demolition provided that there are acceptable plans for its replacement. Proposed replacement building 10. The proposed new dwelling has its roots in the arts and crafts traditions, expressing externally the way the building functions. It thus has an informal arrangement of forms, with sweeping roofs, prominent chimneys, and a mix of window proportions and designs. It is shown set well back in the site to maintain the generous front garden and landscaping and to relate to the alignment of Blackhall Farm. It is a collection of ‘building blocks’ with a main range and a T shape series of ‘extensions’ to the front and rear. Whilst its foot print is larger than the existing, this form of development enables it to maintain ridge heights that are comparable with its neighbours and delivers an
Recommended publications
  • Traffic Sensitive Streets – Briefing Sheet
    Traffic Sensitive Streets – Briefing Sheet Introduction Oxfordshire County Council has a legal duty to coordinate road works across the county, including those undertaken by utility companies. As part of this duty we can designate certain streets as ‘traffic-sensitive’, which means on these roads we can better regulate the flow of traffic by managing when works happen. For example, no road works in the centre of Henley-on-Thames during the Regatta. Sensitive streets designation is not aimed at prohibiting or limiting options for necessary road works to be undertaken. Instead it is designed to open-up necessary discussions with relevant parties to decide when would be the best time to carry out works. Criteria For a street to be considered as traffic sensitive it must meet at least one of the following criteria as set out in the table below: Traffic sensitive street criteria A The street is one on which at any time, the county council estimates traffic flow to be greater than 500 vehicles per hour per lane of carriageway, excluding bus or cycle lanes B The street is a single carriageway two-way road, the carriageway of which is less than 6.5 metres wide, having a total traffic flow of not less than 600 vehicles per hour C The street falls within a congestion charges area D Traffic flow contains more than 25% heavy commercial vehicles E The street carries in both directions more than eight buses per hour F The street is designated for pre-salting by the county council as part of its programme of winter maintenance G The street is within 100 metres of a critical signalised junction, gyratory or roundabout system H The street, or that part of a street, has a pedestrian flow rate at any time of at least 1300 persons per hour per metre width of footway I The street is on a tourist route or within an area where international, national, or significant major local events take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire, County Council
    13109 '04 10 :44 FAx 01865 815447 --------------------- ~J 002 31 -:-. 'Z®p~ OXFORDSHIRE, COUNTY COUNCIL THE OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL(NORTH OXFORD) (CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE AND YARIOUS.RESTRICTIONS) ORDER 2004 The' Oxfordshire County Council, in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1), 2(1), 2(2), 32(1), 35(1), 45(1) 45(2), 124(1)(c), (d) and (f), and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("theAct"), and having regard to Section 122 of the Act, and of all enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in, accordance with Part 111 of Schedule 9 to the Act, hereby make the following Order:- PART 1 . GENERAL This Order shall come into operation on the 20, September 2004 and may be cited as "The Oxfordshire County Council (North Oxford) (Controlled Parking Zone and Various Restrictions) Order 2004". This Order is made for the purpose of a general scheme of traffic management and parking control in a stated area, being the area stated in Schedule 1 to this Order. 3. In this Order, except where the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them:- "Access Way" means-a length of road sufficient to enable a vehicle to have access to and egress from land or premises in or adjacent to the road; "Business" for the purposes of the provisions of Parts VI and VII of this Order means in respect of Part VI any trade or profession conducted from premises within the area specified in Schedule 1 which are wholly or principally used or adapted
    [Show full text]
  • North Oxford Victorian Suburb
    North Oxford Victorian Suburb Conservation Area Appraisal North Oxford Victorian Suburb Contents Statement of Special Interest 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Context 7 3. Historical Development 8 4. Spatial Analysis 12 5. Buildings 16 6. Character Areas 23 Norham Manor 23 Park Town 26 Bardwell 29 Kingston Road 33 St Margaret's 36 Banbury Road 39 North Parade 42 Lathbury and Staverton Roads 45 7. Vulnerabilities, Negative Features and Opportunities for Enhancement 47 8. SOURCES 51 9. APPENDICES 52 1: Listed Buildings 52 2: Positive Unlisted Buildings 58 3: Maps 59 1 1. Summary of Significance Statement of Special Interest This conservation area’s primary signifi- cance derives from its character as a distinct area, imposed in part by topography as Summary well as by land ownership from the 16th century into the 21st century. At a time Key positive features when Oxford needed to expand out of its • Diversity historic core centred around the castle, the • Village-like enclaves medieval streets and the major colleges, these two factors enabled the area to be • Quality of the buildings laid out as a planned suburb as lands asso- • Residential houses a special feature ciated with medieval manors were made • Gothic, Italianate, Arts and Crafts, Vernacular styles available. This gives the area homogeneity • Purpose-built college teaching and as a residential suburb. In the eastern and residential accommodation central parts of the area as a whole, this • Contribution of 20th and 21st centuries to the area is reinforced by the broad streets and the feeling of spaciousness created by the • Three ecclesiastical buildings generously proportioned and well-planted • 73 listed buildings and a further 21 buildings gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH OXFORD) (CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE and WAITING RESTRICTIONS) (VARIATION No.**) ORDER 20**
    OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (NORTH OXFORD) (CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE AND WAITING RESTRICTIONS) (VARIATION No.**) ORDER 20** The Oxfordshire County Council (“the Council”) in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1), 2(1) & (2), 4, 32, 35, 45 & 46 and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and of all other enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, make the following Order. 1. This Order may be cited as the Oxfordshire County Council (North Oxford) (Controlled Parking Zone and Waiting Restrictions) (Variation No.**) Order 20** and shall come into force on the day of 20**. 2. (1) Any reference in this Order to any enactment (meaning any act and any subordinate legislation as defined in the Interpretation Act 1978) shall be construed as a reference to that enactment as amended or replaced by any subsequent enactment. (2) Words importing the masculine gender shall also include the feminine gender and words in the singular include the plural and vice versa. (3) The restrictions imposed by this Order shall be in addition to and not in derogation from any restriction or requirement imposed by any other enactment. (4) Any reference in this Order to a numbered Article or Schedule shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed as a reference to a numbered Article or Schedule bearing that number in this Order. 3. The Oxfordshire County Council (North Oxford) (Controlled Parking Zone and Waiting Restrictions) Order 2004 as amended
    [Show full text]
  • Council Letter Template
    Agenda Item 3 West Area Planning Committee 7th July 2020 Application number: 20/00116/FUL Decision due by 24th April 2020 Extension of time 31st July 2020 Proposal Full planning application for the erection of 7 x three storey buildings and internal and external alterations to old Fairfield House (115 Banbury Road) to form new student bedrooms/flats, with ancillary facilities following demolition of the modern western and southern extensions to Fairfield House (115 Banbury Road). Change of use internal and external alterations and single storey extension of Garden House, r/o 98 Woodstock Road, to form children's nursery. Part demolition of existing boundary walls; demolition of modern extension to Redcliffe-Maud House and cycle sheds. Modification to existing internal access arrangements within the site and associated car and cycle parking, footways and new pedestrian accesses to Banbury Road, and associated landscaping. Site address Fairfield, 115 Banbury Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire – see Paragraph 5.6 for site plan Ward St Margarets Ward Case officer Felicity Byrne Agent: Ms Jane Harrison Applicant: University College Oxford Reason at Committee Major development 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1. The West Area Planning Committee is recommended to: 1.1.1. approve the application for the reasons given in the report and subject to the required planning conditions set out in section 12 of this report and grant planning permission subject to: the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement or unilateral undertaking under section.106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and other enabling powers to secure the planning obligations set out in the recommended heads of terms which are set out in this report; and 1 15 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford and District Labour Party
    Oxford City Council Periodic Electoral Review Submission by Oxford and District Labour Party 25th February 2018 Oxford City Council Periodic Electoral Review - Oxford and District Labour Party Submission Criteria Used The Oxford and District Labour Party submission uses the following principles as criteria for the proposed scheme, in addition to the legally required criteria for equality of electorates: the river Cherwell and the river Thames south of the confluence with the Cherwell should be used as boundaries between wards that wards should be based on clearly identifiable communities or collections of communities as far as possible to use arterial roads as the centre of wards rather than boundaries between them where possible – in several parts of the city it is not - current wards should be the starting point for the new scheme Number of Councillors In line with the submission from Oxford City Council that has been accepted by the Commission, the Labour scheme is for 48 councillors. Number of Wards Oxford currently has a scheme of 24 two member wards, which has been in place since 2002. This approach replaced the previous system of 17 larger wards, and was supported by the Council and the Commission because a larger number of smaller wards had the following advantages: smaller wards offer better community identity with the political boundaries in multi-member wards all electors rightly expect that each councillor is equally representative of them, and a two-member ward scheme means that each councillor represents 33% fewer electors than a three-member ward scheme, enabling them to be more responsive to the needs of their electors wards make it easier for electors to identify with their councillors the communities that make up Oxford better suit 24 two-member wards than they do any other scheme It is Labour’s view that the experience of the current two member ward system has amply demonstrated these advantages; therefore a 24 ward scheme should be retained.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for West Area Planning Committee, 07
    Agenda West Area Planning Committee This meeting will be held by Zoom and streamed to the Council's YouTube channel when the meeting starts https://www.youtube.com/oxfordcitycouncil This meeting will be held on: Date: Tuesday 7 July 2020 Time: 3.00 pm Place: Zoom - Remote meeting For further information please contact: Catherine Phythian, Committee and Member Services Officer, Committee Services Officer 01865 252402 [email protected] Members of the public can attend to observe this meeting and. may register in advance to speak to the committee in accordance with the committee’s rules may record all or part of the meeting in accordance with the Council’s protocol Information about speaking and recording is set out in the agenda and on the website Please contact the Committee Services Officer to register to speak; to discuss recording the meeting; or with any other queries. View or subscribe to updates for agendas, reports and minutes at mycouncil.oxford.gov.uk. All public papers are available from the calendar link to this meeting once published Committee Membership Councillors: Membership 9: Quorum 5: substitutes are permitted. Councillor Colin Cook (Chair) Jericho and Osney; Councillor Michael Gotch (Vice-Chair) Summertown; Councillor Tiago Corais Littlemore; Councillor Paul Harris St. Margaret's; Councillor Alex Hollingsworth Carfax; Councillor Richard Howlett Carfax; Councillor Dan Iley-Williamson Holywell; Councillor Marie Tidball Hinksey Park; Councillor Louise Upton North; Councillor Jamila Begum Azad St. Clement's; substitute Councillor Elizabeth Wade Wolvercote; substitute Apologies and notification of substitutes received before the publication are shown under Apologies for absence in the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Sale Catlogues 1982-2006
    Oxfordshire sale catlogues 1982-2006 Parish Area Street, hamlet, House name Grade Date Agent or Listed building Other information or development or number Developer list no. Abingdon 90 The Vineyard The Barge II 2004 Thomas Merrifield VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Abbey Close 40730 II 2005 John D Wood & Co VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Abbey Close Abbey Walk N/A 2001 Michael Shanly Homes New development Abingdon Abbey Close Dolphin House II 1991 Mallams VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Abbey Close October House N/A 1984 Adkin VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Appleford Drive The Grove N/A 1983 VALE, Abingdon New development Abingdon Audlett Drive Farriers Court N/A 1994 Taywood Homes New development Abingdon Audlett Drive Radley Park N/A 1984 Adkin VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Bath Street 56 II 2002 Mallams VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Bath Street 59 II 2000 Allen & Harris VALE, Abingdon Dating to 1728. Built by Tomkins Abingdon Bath Street Stratton Lodge II* 2005 Thomas Merrifield VALE, Abingdon family Abingdon Bath Street The Gables II 1993 Allen & Harris VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Bath Street II 2004 Thomas Merrifield VALE, Abingdon Pedestrian access to Park Road New development of family homes Abingdon Blacknall Road Caldecott Chase N/A 2007 Banner Homes and apartments New development. Shared Abingdon Blacknall Road Kingfisher N/A 2007 soha housing Ownership housing Abingdon Bostock Road 34 N/A 2007 Thomas Merrifield Abingdon Caldecott Road Manor Court N/A 1985 Adkin New development Bradford & Bingley Abingdon Checker Walk 5 II 2002 Adkin VALE, Abingdon Bradford & Bingley Abingdon Checker Walk 5 II 2002 Adkin VALE, Abingdon Abingdon Colwell Drive Willow Brook N/A 1998 Thomas Merrifield New development Morland's Brewery development.
    [Show full text]