The Dolores Archaeological Program: a Bequest of Old Data and a New User’S Guide, Richard H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dolores Archaeological Program: a Bequest of Old Data and a New User’S Guide, Richard H The Dolores Legacy: A User’s Guide to the Dolores Archaeological Program Data compiled by Richard H. Wilshusen, with the assistance of Karin Burd, Jonathan Till, Christine G. Ward, and Brian Yunker With contributions by Sarah B. Barber Karin Burd Daniel T. Falt Paul J. Farley Cara C. Gulley Gretchen Jordan Michael P. Larkin William D. Lipe Judy Newland Jonathan Till Josh Torres Joel Tyberg Lynn L. Udick Christine G. Ward Richard H. Wilshusen Brian Yunker DO NOT CITE OR REPRODUCE WITHOUT PERMISSION (See the preface for note on how to contact the authors.) Revised July 15, 1999 Copyright 1999 by Richard Hamilton Wilshusen All rights reserved. ii Contents List of Illustrations v List of Tables vii Editor’s Preface viii Acknowledgments ix 1 Introduction The Legacy of the Dolores Archaeological Program: A Bequest of Old Data and a New User’s Guide, Richard H. Wilshusen 1 The DAP Data Files: A Short History of Their Original Design, Past Uses, and Possible Importance in the Near Future, Lynn L. Udick and Richard H. Wilshusen 13 2 Provenience Data and Temporal-Spatial Interpretations The DAP Provenience Data, Christine G. Ward 23 The Temporal-Spatial System, Jonathan Till 31 3 The Artifact Data The DAP Ceramic Data, Karin Burd 43 Flaked Lithic Artifacts, Sarah B. Barber 53 Nonflaked Lithic Tools, Cara C. Gulley 65 The DAP Faunal Data, Daniel T. Falt 77 Botanical Resources, Joel Tyberg 87 Ornaments, Rare Rocks, and Miscellaneous, Judy Newland 97 4 Samples, Photographs, and Maps Samples, Josh Torres 105 Photographs, Brian Yunker 115 Maps, Michael P. Larkin 121 5 Special Studies Special Studies, Gretchen Jordan 127 6 The Dolores Program After 20 Years View from the Lake: Legacies of the Dolores Archaeological Program, SW Colorado, William D. Lipe 135 Appendix I: The 10 Commandments for Using the DAP Data 145 Appendix II: Abridged Data Dictionary for DAP Data Sets 149 iii Appendix III: CD-ROM Directory Structure 197 Appendix IV: Summaries of DAP Volumes 207 Appendix V: Summaries of Temporal-Spatial Assignments and Excavation Totals for Dolores Archaeological Program Sites 221 References Cited 235 Contributors 257 iv Illustrations 1.1 Map of location of Dolores Project in relation to major geographic features. From Robinson et al. 1986: Fig. 1.1……………………………………………..after 12 1.2 Photo of Dolores River valley from the Middle Canyon area. From Wilshusen 1986b: Fig. 3.1…………………………………………………after 12 1.3 Map of Dolores area villages, A.D. 840-880. From Wilshusen and Ortman 1999: Fig. 4………………………………………………………….…..after 12 1.4 Map of McPhee and Grass Mesa Villages. From Wilshusen and Ortman 1999: Fig. 5 ….……………………………………………………….…after 12 2.1 DAP FS form………………………………………….……………………..after 30 2.2 DAP Feature form…………………………………………………………...after 30 2.3 DAP spatial systematics. Adapted from Kane 1986: Figs. 5.1 and 5.2.…….after 42 2.4 Plan of household clusters and interhousehold clusters, Element 2, McPhee Pueblo. From Brisbin et al. 1988: Fig. 2.92……………………………after 42 3.1 Approximate geographic locations of ceramic manufacturing tracts within the Mesa Verde region. From Blinman and Wilson 1988a: Fig. 9.2……...after 52 3.2 Moccasin Gray jar (vessel 15) recovered from Site 5MT2181. From Etzkorn 1986: Fig. 6.26……………………………………………………after 52 3.3 Example of a particular subtype (T-11) within the DAP multivariate typological study of projectile points. From Phagan 1988b: Fig. 3F.2…..…………………..after 64 3.4 Comparison of Tres Bobos and Sagehen household cluster toolkit correlations with Dos Casas and Periman subphase household cluster toolkit correlations. From Hruby 1988: Figs. 6.45 and 6.46…………………………………………..after 64 3.5 Plan map of Pitstructure 1, Site 5MT2193 (Dos Casas). Note in particular the two in situ metates (Mealing features 21 and 112) with possible collecting basin (Feature 76). From Brisbin et al. 1986: Fig. 8.11………………………………..after 76 3.6 Measurements taken on large hafted tools. From Phagan 1986b: Fig. 3.33…after 76 v 3.7 Gaming pieces made of worked bone, from Site 5MT5106 (Weasel Pueblo). From Morris 1988: Fig. 5.52…………………………………………….……….after 86 3.8 Bone-tool-production toolkit and associated Abajo Red-on-orange feather box, from Site 5MT4644 (Windy Wheat Hamlet). From Brisbin 1986: Fig. 9.46…….after 86 3.9 Proportional taxonomic composition of faunal assemblages from McPhee Village roomblocks. From Potter 1997: Fig. 6….……………………….……...after 86 3.10 Bird s eye view of the reconstructed potential dry farming belt, AD 800-1000, southwestern Colorado and climatograph for dry-farm corn, A.D. 800-1000. From Petersen 1987d: Fig. 15.5………………………………………………….after 96 3.11 Standard DAP sampling scheme for hearths and related features. From Kane and Robinson 1984: Fig. 25….………………………………………after 96 3.12 Jet effigy from midden deposit, Area 4, Site 5MT23 (Grass Mesa Village). From Morris et al. 1988: Fig.6.51…………….………………………………...after 104 4.1 Stratigraphic profile of Pitstructure 2, Site 5MT2193 (Dos Casas). From Brisbin et al. 1986: Fig. 8.20…………….………………………………..after 114 4.2 Plan map of roof fall, Pitstructure 2, Site 5MT2193 (Dos Casas). From Brisbin et al. 1986: Fig. 8.37….………….……………………………….after 114 4.3 View of lake area…………………………………………………………...after 120 4.4 Excavation in progress, Site 5MT4512 (Cascade House). From Wilshusen 1986c: Fig. 10.11………………………………………………after 120 4.5 Eccentric flaked lithic items from fill of Pitstructure 202, Area 3, Site 5MT2182 (Rio Vista Village). From Wilshusen and Varien 1986: Fig. 3.124……………...after 120 4.6 Probability and judgmental sampling plan for Area 3, Site 5MT2182 (Rio Vista Village). From Wilshusen and Varien 1986: Fig. 3.88………………after 126 5.1 Momentary human population by modeling period. From Schlanger 1987: Fig. 23.2…………………………………………………after 134 vi Tables Table 2.1 Location of Human Burials, Selected McPhee Village Sites…………………..29 Table 2.2 DAP Phases and Subphases by Tradition……………………………….……..40 Table 3.1 Distribution of Local and Nonlocal Lithic Materials in Cores from Selected McPhee Village Sites………………………………………………………….…61 Table 3.2 Distribution of Local and Nonlocal Lithic Materials in Cores from Selected DAP Villages………………………………………………………………….…62 Table 3.3 Distribution of Local and Nonlocal Lithic Materials in Projectile Points from Selected DAP Villages……………………………………………………………….63 Table 3.4 Complete 2-Hand Manos and Trough Metates at Selected Sagehill-Dos Casas and Periman Subphase Sites………………………………………….73 Table 3.5 Provenience of 2-Hand Manos and Trough Metates, Selected Sagehill-Dos Casas Subphase Sites……………………………………………...74 Table 3.6 Provenience of 2-Hand Manos and Trough Metates, Selected Periman Subphase Sites………………………………………………………….74 Table 3.7 Number of Identifiable Specimens for Roomblocks in McPhee Village.…...…..85 Table 3.8 Ubiquity of Ruderal Seeds and Fruits in McPhee Community Sites………..….94 Table 3.9 Ubiquity of Wild Seeds and Fruits in the McPhee Community Sites….……….95 Table 4.1 Stem and Leaf Diagram for “vv” Tree-Ring Dates from Site 5MT2193.……..113 Table 5.1 Known Cultural Resources of the Dolores Project Area, as of 1983………….128 Table 5.2 DAP Sites with Excavated Probability Samples………………………..……..134 vii Editor’s Preface This volume is an experiment. It is part of a search for a model user’s guide for archaeological databases. As with most early experiments, it is likely that there is much that could be improved. Possibly some things are done better than most readers might have expected. We have worked hard to make an old data set available, and we now need your help in improving this initial effort. You are holding in your hands one of only about 50 volumes of this user’s guide that we are distributing to potentially interested readers. Please read through the text, work with the data on the CD-ROM, and then tell us what needs improvement and where we might be wrong. We need comments by approximately December 1999 if they are to be incorporated into a revised version of this guide. Please excuse the rough quality of the figures and the text reproduction. Until we get comments on the present version, we have focused on producing an accurate, rather than a pretty, text. Figures are simple xerox copies and are at the end of the appropriate section. If you have suggestions on other figures that are needed, please offer these comments as well. Send comments to Richard Wilshusen, University Museum, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0218. You can also send comments via email to [email protected]. All comments will be appreciated, but constructive comments are especially welcomed. If you are interested in reproducing or citing the manuscript in a research context, please feel free to contact us at the above address. Richard H. Wilshusen July 14, 1999 viii Acknowledgments This project was paid for in part by a State Historical Fund grant from the Colorado Historical Society. There is no way that this project could have occurred without this grant. We are most grateful for the Society’s support of this endeavor and for all the aid their staff has offered us as we have labored on this project. LouAnn Jacobson (Bureau of Land Management, Anasazi Heritage Center) and Stephen Lekson (University of Colorado) wrote the project grant proposal and helped oversee the two main aspects of the Dolores Database Project. At the University of Colorado (CU) Richard Wilshusen and a class of graduate student contributors wrote the user’s guide and pulled together the data on the accompanying CD. Victoria Atkins and Susan Thomas, with the assistance of Patricia Lacey, coordinated the ARGUS data conversions for the Anasazi Heritage Center’s DAP database. There were many, many people—especially many ex-DAP researchers—who aided in CU’s updating a data set that is over 20 years old. While we hesitate to single individuals out, Paul Farley, who was the Lab Director at Dolores two decades ago, participated in all the CU classes, answered hundreds of questions by the authors, and truly made this volume substantially better.
Recommended publications
  • Dolores Water Conservancy District 60 Cactus St
    Planning and Development to Further the Dolores Watershed and Resilient Forest Collaborative Dolores Water Conservancy District 60 Cactus St. PO Box 1150 Cortez, CO 81321 Ken Curtis, Chief of Engineering and Construction, DWCD 60 Cactus St. PO Box 1150 [email protected] 970-565-7562 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Background Data ............................................................................................................................ 1 The Dolores Watershed............................................................................................................... 1 Water Rights & Early Settlers..................................................................................................... 3 The Reclamations Era & Dolores Water Conservancy District .................................................. 3 Dolores Project Current Status.................................................................................................... 4 Water Issues of Concern ............................................................................................................. 4 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 6 Technical Project Description
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cortez Source Water Protection Plan
    City of Cortez Source Water Protection Plan Montezuma County, Colorado April 13, 2021 Written by Kimberly Mihelich, Source Water Specialist Colorado Rural Water Association For the Community Water Provider: Insert Cover Photo Here City of Cortez, PWSID# CO142200 Edited by Rich Landreth Insert PWS Logo (if available) City of Cortez Source Water Protection Plan Primary Contact Information for City of Cortez PWS Name City of Cortez PWSID # CO0142200 Name Rich Landreth Title Water Treatment Plant Superintendent Address 27999 County Road N; Dolores, CO 81323 Phone (970) 565-9824 Website https://www.cityofcortez.com/ Cover photo description and acknowledgments. This Source Water Protection Plan is a planning document and there is no legal requirement to implement the recommendations herein. Actions on public lands will be subject to federal, state, and county policies and procedures. Action on private land may require compliance with county land use codes, building codes, local covenants, and permission from the landowner. This SWPP for the City of Cortez was developed using version 16.09.09 of the Colorado Rural Water Association’s Source Water Protection Plan Template. Page | 2 City of Cortez Source Water Protection Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMON ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOLORES WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 2014 Water Management and Conservation Plan
    DOLORES WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 2014 Water Management and Conservation Plan Prepared by: Harris Water Engineering, Inc. Funded by: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation i | P a g e Executive Summary The Dolores Water Conservancy District (District) operates the Dolores Project (Project), which consists of the 381,000 acre-foot McPhee Reservoir (McPhee), to provide water to non-Indian and Ute Mountain Ute Tribe water users. The District is located in Dolores and Montezuma counties in southwestern Colorado. The District boundary extends from the Town of Dove Creek south to the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation a distance of 45 miles and from the Utah/Colorado state line on the west to the Town of Dolores on the east, a distance of 28 miles. There are 446 square miles within the District containing approximately 68,000 acres of irrigated lands. The Dolores River, originating northeast of the District area in the San Juan and La Plata Mountains, is the main source of water for the Project and storage in McPhee. The Dolores River has an average annual runoff of about 351,000 acre-feet (as listed in the Definite Plan Report). Tributaries to the Dolores River also collected in McPhee include Lost Canyon Creek, West Dolores River, Beaver Creek, House Creek and Plateau Creek. Construction started in the spring of 1978, but was suspended under the Carter Administration’s “hit list”. Due to resolution of Indian reserved water rights, the project was removed from the list and construction proceeded in 1979. Although water was available to Cortez & the Montezuma Valley Irrigation Company during the 1986 season and the first full service irrigators started their sprinkler irrigation systems in June 1987, the majority of the Project was not fully on line 1999, when all of the Project facilities were completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability, Consequences, and Adaptation Planning Scenarios (VCAPS) City of Cortez Final Workshop Report
    Vulnerability, Consequences, and Adaptation Planning Scenarios (VCAPS) City of Cortez Final Workshop Report November 2018 Submitted by: Western Water Assessment Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado Boulder About the Western Water Assessment Western Water Assessment (WWA) is a university-based applied research program that addresses societal vulnerabilities to climate variability and climate change, particularly those related to water resources. While we are based in Boulder, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah, we work across Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Our mission is to conduct innovative research in partnership with decision makers, helping them make the best use of science to manage for climate impacts. WWA is part of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Our primary source of funding is NOAA’s Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) Program, and we are one of 11 RISA programs operating across the United States. Authors & Facilitation Team Seth Arens Katie Clifford Lisa Dilling Samuel Ehret Jen Henderson Acknowledgements Thank you to all participants of the VCAPS in Cortez pilot project for your enthusiasm for this process and thoughtful feedback on this report. Thank you especially to Philip Johnson for his support in pre-workshop planning, securing the venue, and arranging refreshments and other logistics for the workshop. Thank you as well to Kirstin Dow, Jess Whitehead, and Seth Tuler from the Carolina Integrated Sciences and Assessment (CISA), North Carolina Sea Grant, and the Social and Environmental Research Institute (SERI), the creators of VCAPS, for training us, answering our questions, and providing valuable support as we prepared for this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Rico-West Dolores Roads and Trails (Travel Management) Project Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rico-West Dolores Roads and Trails (Travel Management) Project Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dolores District, San Juan National Forest, Dolores and Montezuma Counties, Colorado July, 2017 For More Information Contact: Derek Padilla, Dolores District Ranger Dolores District 29211 Hwy. 184 Dolores, CO 81323 970-882-7296 [email protected] FAX: 970-882-6841 1 RWD SDEIS In accordance with federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, office, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dolores Project
    The Dolores Project Garrit Voggesser Bureau of Reclamation History 2001 Table of Contents Dolores Project ...............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................3 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Prehistoric Setting .................................................4 Historic Setting ...................................................6 Project Authorization....................................................17 Construction History ....................................................18 McPhee Dam, Dolores Tunnel and Canal, and the Great Cut Dike ..........23 Pumping Plants and Powerplants.....................................28 Canals, Laterals, and Bridges .......................................30 Recreation Areas and the Anasazi Heritage Center.......................32 Contested Waters and Project Completion .............................34 Post-Construction History................................................38 Settlement of the Project/Uses of Project Water ...............................40 Conclusion............................................................41 About the Author .............................................................42 Bibliography ................................................................43 Archival Collections ....................................................43 Government Documents .................................................43 Books ................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: History of Dolores River Water Use, the Dolores Project, The
    Appendix 2: History of Dolores River Water Use, the Dolores Project, the Rise of Environmental Consciousness Nationally and Locally, and Stakeholder Collaboration to Promote Conservation of Lower Dolores River Natural Resources The Dolores Project has been a boon to local economic development and stability in the Montezuma Valley, McElmo Creek basin, and surrounding areas while also being the key structure in discussions of environmental issues of concern on the Lower Dolores River. Central to understanding the importance of the Dolores Project is the history of settlement and water use along the Dolores River in the Montezuma Valley prior to the construction of the Project; the commitments made by the U.S. Congress, Federal agencies, and local entities – the Montezuma Valley Irrigation Company (“MVIC”), the Dolores Water Conservancy District (“DWCD”) and the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe – necessary to make the Project a reality; and the responsiveness of stakeholders to evolving issues in the community and nationally. This appendix explains how Colorado water law, particularly the prior appropriation doctrine, trans- basin diversion issues and MVIC’s senior water rights, and Dolores Project contracts and other Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) responsibilities, impact Dolores Project water use and the Dolores River. This appendix also discusses the evolution in conservation ethos and environmental awareness that coincided with Project development. The objective in creating this appendix is to provide factual background information that undergirds the Dolores River Dialogue (DRD) purpose statement: … to explore management opportunities, build support for and take action to improve the ecological conditions in the Dolores River downstream of McPhee Reservoir while honoring water rights, protecting agricultural and municipal water supplies, and the continued enjoyment of boating and fishing.
    [Show full text]