DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Download Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP 125, 1, 2019 Group–Theoretical Origin of CP Violation Mu–Chun Chen and Michael Ratz University of California Irvine, Irvine CA 92697, USA Abstract This is a short review of the proposal that violation may be due to the fact that certain finite groups do CP not admit a physical transformation. This origin of violation is realized in explicit string compacti- CP CP fications exhibiting the Standard Model spectrum. Keywords: 1.2. and Clebsch–Gordan coefficients CP DOI: 10.31526/LHEP.1.2019.125 It turns out that some finite groups do not have such outer au- tomorphisms but still complex representations. These groups thus clash with ! Further, they have no basis in which all CP 1. INTRODUCTION Clebsch–Gordan coefficients (CGs) are real, and violation CP As is well known, the flavor sector of the Standard Model (SM) can thus be linked to the complexity of the CGs [3]. violates , the combination of the discrete symmetries and CP C . This suggests that flavor and violation have a common P CP origin. The question of flavor concerns the fact that the SM 2. CP VIOLATION FROM FINITE GROUPS fermions come in three families that are only distinguished by 2.1. The canonical transformation their masses. SU(2) interactions lead to transitions between CP L Let us start by collecting some basic facts. Consider a scalar these families, which are governed by the mixing parameters field operator in the CKM and PMNS matrices. These mixing parameters are completely unexplained in the SM. Furthermore, violation Z h i CP 3 1 i p x † i p x d f(x) = d p a(~p) e− · + b (~p) e · , (2.1) manifests in the SM through the non–zero phase q in the CKM 2E matrix [1]. In the lepton sector, the latest measurements from ~p T2K as well as the global fit for neutrino oscillation parameters where a annihilates a particle and b† creates an antiparticle. also hint at non–zero value for the Dirac phase d in the PMNS ` The operation exchanges particles and antiparticles, matrix [2], which will, if proved, establish violation of in CP CP the lepton sector. 1 (CP)− a(~p) CP = h b( ~p) , (2.2a) The observed repetition of families, i.e., the fact that the CP − 1 † † quarks and leptons appear in 3 generations, hints at a flavor (CP)− a (~p) CP = h∗ b ( ~p) (2.2b) CP − symmetry under which the generations transform nontrivially. 1 (CP)− b(~p) CP = h∗ a( ~p) , (2.2c) The main punchline of this review is the statement that certain CP − 1 † † flavor symmetries clash with [3, 4]. In other words, vi- (CP)− b (~p) CP = h a ( ~p) , (2.2d) CP CP CP − olation can be entirely group theoretical in origin. where h is a phase factor. On the scalar fields, transfor- CP CP 1.1. What is a physical transformation? mations act as CP Charge conjugation inverts, by definition, all currents. This CP C f(x) h f∗( x) . (2.3) implies that Standard Model representations R get mapped to 7−−! CP P their conjugates, R. Likewise, parity exchanges the (0, 1/2) At this level, h can be viewed as the freedom of rephasing the P and (1/2, 0) representations of the Lorentz group, which corre- field, i.e., a choiceCP of field basis. Later, when we replace h by sponds to complex conjugation at the level of SL(2, C). That some matrix U , this will still reflect the freedom to chooseCP CP is, at the level of GSM SL(2, C), is represented by the a basis. The important message here is that there is a well– × CP (unique) nontrivial outer automorphism. defined operation, the transformation, which exchanges CP This fact has led to the suspicion that any nontrivial outer particles with antiparticles. It is this very transformation which automorphism can be used to coin a valid transforma- is broken in the K0 K0 system, and whose violation is a pre- CP − tion [5]. However, this turns out not to be the case [4]. To see requisite for baryogenesis. this, let us review why we care about whether or not is vio- CP lated. One reason we care is that violation is a prerequisite CP 2.2. vs. outer automorphisms for baryogenesis [6], i.e., the creation of the matter–antimatter CP asymmetry of our universe. Therefore, a physical transfor- Next let us review what does in the context of most of the CP CP mation exchanges particles and antiparticles, a requirement an continuous (i.e., Lie) groups. If the representation under con- sideration is real, the canonical does the job. For complex arbitrary outer automorphism may or may not fulfill. As dis- CP cussed in detail in [4], transformations are linked to class– representations, involves a nontrivial outer automorphism CP CP inverting outer automorphisms. (cf. Figure 1). In particular, in the context of the Standard Model gauge group and the usual theories of grand unification (GUTs), G = SU(3) SU(2) U(1) SU(5) SO(10) E SM C × L × Y ⊂ ⊂ ⊂ 6 1 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP 125, 1, 2019 1 2 n 2 n 1 Hence, the canonical transformation is not an (outer) au- − − CP tomorphism of T0(in this basis). Therefore, in order to warrant conservation, one needs to impose a so–called generalized CP CPg FIGURE 1: acts as the unique nontrivial outer automorphism on the transformation CPg under which f f as usual but CP CP 7−−! ∗ SU(N) groups. 0 1 0 1 0 1 x 0 1 y x1 1∗ y1 1∗ CPg B C CPg B C @ x2 A B x3∗ C , B y2 C B y3∗ C . (2.7) always involves outer automorphisms, 7−−! @ A @ A 7−−! @ A CP x y 3 x2∗ 3 y2∗ × ⊂ 2.4. Constraints on generalized transformations In order for a transformationCP not to clash with the group, ⊂ CP i.e., in order to avoid mapping something that is invariant un- der the symmetry transformations to something that isn’t (cf. (2.6)), it has to be an automorphism u : G G of the group. ! ⊂ An automorphism u corresponding to a physical transfor- CP mation has to fulfill the consistency condition [5] (see also [7]) One may thus expect that this is also true for discrete (fam- † ily) symmetries. However, this is an accident, and is already not r u(g) = U r(g)∗ U g G . (2.8) CP CP 8 2 the case for SO(8), the only Lie group with a non–Abelian outer Here, U is a unitary matrix that enters the generalized automorphism group, namely S . Which of those outer auto- CP 3 transformation, morphisms, if any, corresponds to the physical transforma- CP CP tion? As we shall discuss next, in particular for finite groups, it CP F(x) g U F ( x) , (2.9) is not true that there is a unique outer automorphism. In addi- 7−−! CP ∗ P tion, not all non-trivial outer automorphism qualify as a physi- where F denotes collectively the fields of the theory/model, cal transformation [3, 4]. and (t,~x) = (t, ~x) as usual. In particular, each represen- CP P − tation gets mapped on its own conjugate, i.e., UCP is block– 2.3. Generalized transformations diagonal in Equation (2.9), To see this, considerCP a setting with discrete symmetry G. One 0 1 0 1 0 1 can now impose a so–called generalized transformation, " -% " Bfr C B Ur C Bfr∗ C CP B i1 C B i1 C B i1 C 1 B C B C B C (CP)− a(~p) CP = UCP b( ~p) , (2.4a) B # C B.& C B # C − B C CPg B C B C 1 † † † B C B C B C , (CP)− a (~p) CP = b ( ~p) UCP (2.4b) B " C B -% C B " C fri 7−−! Uri fr∗ − B 2 C B 2 C B i2 C 1 † B C B C B C (CP)− b(~p) CP = a( ~p) UCP , (2.4c) B C B C B C − @ # A @ .& A @ # A 1 † † . .. (CP)− b (~p) CP = U a ( ~p) , (2.4d) . CP − . where a is a vector of annihilation operators and a† is a vector (2.10) of creation operators. UCP is a unitary matrix. where the Uria are unitary matrices that depend on the rep- The reader may wonder whether or not the need to “gener- resentation ri only. The a subscripts in fria label the particles alize” is specific to the transformation. This is not the case. CP whereas the ia subscripts indicate the representations, i.e., dif- A very close analogy is the Majorana condition. In the Majo- ferent particles can furnish the same representations under G. rana basis, it boils down to the requirement that Y = Y∗ for a The transformation law (2.10) disagrees with [5], where it was Dirac spinor Y. However, in the Weyl or Dirac basis, this condi- suggested that one can use any outer automorphism in order tion becomes Y = C Y∗ with some appropriate matrix C. That to define a viable transformation. CP is, the antiparticle of a particle described by Y is described by Therefore, the requirement that the candidate transforma- C Y∗, and not just Y∗. Likewise, in the above discussion around tion is a physical transformation, which exchanges particles (2.4), the conjugate (i.e., antiparticle up to a transformation CP CP and their antiparticles, amounts to demanding that u be class– of the spatial coordinates) of a scalar described by f will be inverting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:Math/0511624V1
    Automorphism groups of polycyclic-by-finite groups and arithmetic groups Oliver Baues ∗ Fritz Grunewald † Mathematisches Institut II Mathematisches Institut Universit¨at Karlsruhe Heinrich-Heine-Universit¨at D-76128 Karlsruhe D-40225 D¨usseldorf May 18, 2005 Abstract We show that the outer automorphism group of a polycyclic-by-finite group is an arithmetic group. This result follows from a detailed structural analysis of the automorphism groups of such groups. We use an extended version of the theory of the algebraic hull functor initiated by Mostow. We thus make applicable refined methods from the theory of algebraic and arithmetic groups. We also construct examples of polycyclic-by-finite groups which have an automorphism group which does not contain an arithmetic group of finite index. Finally we discuss applications of our results to the groups of homotopy self-equivalences of K(Γ, 1)-spaces and obtain an extension of arithmeticity results of Sullivan in rational homo- topy theory. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 20F28, 20G30; Secondary 11F06, 14L27, 20F16, 20F34, 22E40, 55P10 arXiv:math/0511624v1 [math.GR] 25 Nov 2005 ∗e-mail: [email protected] †e-mail: [email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Themainresults ........................... 4 1.2 Outlineoftheproofsandmoreresults . 6 1.3 Cohomologicalrepresentations . 8 1.4 Applications to the groups of homotopy self-equivalences of spaces 9 2 Prerequisites on linear algebraic groups and arithmetic groups 12 2.1 Thegeneraltheory .......................... 12 2.2 Algebraicgroupsofautomorphisms. 15 3 The group of automorphisms of a solvable-by-finite linear algebraic group 17 3.1 The algebraic structure of Auta(H)................
    [Show full text]
  • 14.2 Covers of Symmetric and Alternating Groups
    Remark 206 In terms of Galois cohomology, there an exact sequence of alge- braic groups (over an algebrically closed field) 1 → GL1 → ΓV → OV → 1 We do not necessarily get an exact sequence when taking values in some subfield. If 1 → A → B → C → 1 is exact, 1 → A(K) → B(K) → C(K) is exact, but the map on the right need not be surjective. Instead what we get is 1 → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), A) → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), B) → H0(Gal(K¯ /K), C) → → H1(Gal(K¯ /K), A) → ··· 1 1 It turns out that H (Gal(K¯ /K), GL1) = 1. However, H (Gal(K¯ /K), ±1) = K×/(K×)2. So from 1 → GL1 → ΓV → OV → 1 we get × 1 1 → K → ΓV (K) → OV (K) → 1 = H (Gal(K¯ /K), GL1) However, taking 1 → µ2 → SpinV → SOV → 1 we get N × × 2 1 ¯ 1 → ±1 → SpinV (K) → SOV (K) −→ K /(K ) = H (K/K, µ2) so the non-surjectivity of N is some kind of higher Galois cohomology. Warning 207 SpinV → SOV is onto as a map of ALGEBRAIC GROUPS, but SpinV (K) → SOV (K) need NOT be onto. Example 208 Take O3(R) =∼ SO3(R)×{±1} as 3 is odd (in general O2n+1(R) =∼ SO2n+1(R) × {±1}). So we have a sequence 1 → ±1 → Spin3(R) → SO3(R) → 1. 0 × Notice that Spin3(R) ⊆ C3 (R) =∼ H, so Spin3(R) ⊆ H , and in fact we saw that it is S3. 14.2 Covers of symmetric and alternating groups The symmetric group on n letter can be embedded in the obvious way in On(R) as permutations of coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONJUGACY CLASS RANKS of M24 Communicated by Robert Turner Curtis 1. Introduction M24 Is the Largest Mathieu Sporadic Simple
    International Journal of Group Theory ISSN (print): 2251-7650, ISSN (on-line): 2251-7669 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2017), pp. 53-58. ⃝c 2017 University of Isfahan ijgt.ui.ac.ir www.ui.ac.ir THE CONJUGACY CLASS RANKS OF M24 ZWELETHEMBA MPONO Dedicated to Professor Jamshid Moori on the occasion of his seventieth birthday Communicated by Robert Turner Curtis 10 3 Abstract. M24 is the largest Mathieu sporadic simple group of order 244823040 = 2 ·3 ·5·7·11·23 and contains all the other Mathieu sporadic simple groups as subgroups. The object in this paper is to study the ranks of M24 with respect to the conjugacy classes of all its nonidentity elements. 1. Introduction 10 3 M24 is the largest Mathieu sporadic simple group of order 244823040 = 2 ·3 ·5·7·11·23 and contains all the other Mathieu sporadic simple groups as subgroups. It is a 5-transitive permutation group on a set of 24 points such that: (i) the stabilizer of a point is M23 which is 4-transitive (ii) the stabilizer of two points is M22 which is 3-transitive (iii) the stabilizer of a dodecad is M12 which is 5-transitive (iv) the stabilizer of a dodecad and a point is M11 which is 4-transitive M24 has a trivial Schur multiplier, a trivial outer automorphism group and it is the automorphism group of the Steiner system of type S(5,8,24) which is used to describe the Leech lattice on which M24 acts. M24 has nine conjugacy classes of maximal subgroups which are listed in [4], its ordinary character table is found in [4], its blocks and its Brauer character tables corresponding to the various primes dividing its order are found in [9] and [10] respectively and its complete prime spectrum is given by 2; 3; 5; 7; 11; 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Automorphism Group of the Ergodic Equivalence Relation Generated by Translations of Dense Subgroup of Compact Group on Its Homogeneous Space
    Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 32 (1996), 517-538 Outer Automorphism Group of the Ergodic Equivalence Relation Generated by Translations of Dense Subgroup of Compact Group on its Homogeneous Space By Sergey L. GEFTER* Abstract We study the outer automorphism group OutRr of the ergodic equivalence relation Rr generated by the action of a lattice F in a semisimple Lie group on the homogeneos space of a compact group K. It is shown that OutRr is locally compact. If K is a connected simple Lie group, we prove the compactness of 0\itRr using the D. Witte's rigidity theorem. Moreover, an example of an equivalence relation without outer automorphisms is constructed. Introduction An important problem in the theory of full factors [Sak], [Con 1] and in the orbit theory for groups with the T-property [Kaz] is that of studying the group of outer automorphisms of the corresponding object as a topological group. Unlike the amenable case, the outer automorphism group is a Polish space in the natural topology (see Section 1) and its topological properties are algebraic invariants of the factor and orbital invariants of the dynamical sys- tem. The first results in this sphere were obtained by A. Connes [Con 2] in 1980 who showed that the outer automorphism group of the Hi-factor of an ICC-group with the T-property is discrete and at most countable. Various ex- amples of factors and ergodic equivalence relations with locally compact groups of outer automorphisms were constructed in [Cho 1] , [EW] , [GGN] , [Gol] , [GG 1] and [GG 2] . In [Gol] and [GG 2] the topological properties of the outer automorphism group were used to construct orbitally nonequivalent Communicated by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Free and Linear Representations of Outer Automorphism Groups of Free Groups
    Free and linear representations of outer automorphism groups of free groups Dawid Kielak Magdalen College University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Trinity 2012 This thesis is dedicated to Magda Acknowledgements First and foremost the author wishes to thank his supervisor, Martin R. Bridson. The author also wishes to thank the following people: his family, for their constant support; David Craven, Cornelia Drutu, Marc Lackenby, for many a helpful conversation; his office mates. Abstract For various values of n and m we investigate homomorphisms Out(Fn) ! Out(Fm) and Out(Fn) ! GLm(K); i.e. the free and linear representations of Out(Fn) respectively. By means of a series of arguments revolving around the representation theory of finite symmetric subgroups of Out(Fn) we prove that each ho- momorphism Out(Fn) ! GLm(K) factors through the natural map ∼ πn : Out(Fn) ! GL(H1(Fn; Z)) = GLn(Z) whenever n = 3; m < 7 and char(K) 62 f2; 3g, and whenever n + 1 n > 5; m < 2 and char(K) 62 f2; 3; : : : ; n + 1g: We also construct a new infinite family of linear representations of Out(Fn) (where n > 2), which do not factor through πn. When n is odd these have the smallest dimension among all known representations of Out(Fn) with this property. Using the above results we establish that the image of every homomor- phism Out(Fn) ! Out(Fm) is finite whenever n = 3 and n < m < 6, and n of cardinality at most 2 whenever n > 5 and n < m < 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Special Unitary Group - Wikipedia
    Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Special unitary group In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU( n), is the Lie group of n×n unitary matrices with determinant 1. (More general unitary matrices may have complex determinants with absolute value 1, rather than real 1 in the special case.) The group operation is matrix multiplication. The special unitary group is a subgroup of the unitary group U( n), consisting of all n×n unitary matrices. As a compact classical group, U( n) is the group that preserves the standard inner product on Cn.[nb 1] It is itself a subgroup of the general linear group, SU( n) ⊂ U( n) ⊂ GL( n, C). The SU( n) groups find wide application in the Standard Model of particle physics, especially SU(2) in the electroweak interaction and SU(3) in quantum chromodynamics.[1] The simplest case, SU(1) , is the trivial group, having only a single element. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of quaternions of norm 1, and is thus diffeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since unit quaternions can be used to represent rotations in 3-dimensional space (up to sign), there is a surjective homomorphism from SU(2) to the rotation group SO(3) whose kernel is {+ I, − I}. [nb 2] SU(2) is also identical to one of the symmetry groups of spinors, Spin(3), that enables a spinor presentation of rotations. Contents Properties Lie algebra Fundamental representation Adjoint representation The group SU(2) Diffeomorphism with S 3 Isomorphism with unit quaternions Lie Algebra The group SU(3) Topology Representation theory Lie algebra Lie algebra structure Generalized special unitary group Example Important subgroups See also 1 of 10 2/22/2018, 8:54 PM Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Remarks Notes References Properties The special unitary group SU( n) is a real Lie group (though not a complex Lie group).
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Bps M2-Brane Orbifolds 3
    HALF-BPS M2-BRANE ORBIFOLDS PAUL DE MEDEIROS AND JOSÉ FIGUEROA-O’FARRILL Abstract. Smooth Freund–Rubin backgrounds of eleven-dimensional supergravity of the form AdS X7 and preserving at least half of the supersymmetry have been recently clas- 4 × sified. Requiring that amount of supersymmetry forces X to be a spherical space form, whence isometric to the quotient of the round 7-sphere by a freely-acting finite subgroup of SO(8). The classification is given in terms of ADE subgroups of the quaternions embed- dedin SO(8) as the graph of an automorphism. In this paper we extend this classification by dropping the requirement that the background be smooth, so that X is now allowed to be an orbifold of the round 7-sphere. We find that if the background preserves more than half of the supersymmetry, then it is automatically smooth in accordance with the homo- geneity conjecture, but that there are many half-BPS orbifolds, most of them new. The classification is now given in terms of pairs of ADE subgroups of quaternions fibred over the same finite group. We classify such subgroups and then describe the resulting orbi- folds in terms of iterated quotients. In most cases the resulting orbifold can be described as a sequence of cyclic quotients. Contents List of Tables 2 1. Introduction 3 How to use this paper 5 2. Spherical orbifolds 7 2.1. Spin orbifolds 8 2.2. Statement of the problem 9 3. Finite subgroups of the quaternions 10 4. Goursat’s Lemma 12 arXiv:1007.4761v3 [hep-th] 25 Aug 2010 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Finitely Generated Profinite Groups, Ii 241
    Annals of Mathematics, 165 (2007), 239–273 On finitely generated profinite groups, II: products in quasisimple groups By Nikolay Nikolov* and Dan Segal Abstract We prove two results. (1) There is an absolute constant D such that for any finite quasisimple group S, given 2D arbitrary automorphisms of S, every element of S is equal to a product of D ‘twisted commutators’ defined by the given automorphisms. (2) Given a natural number q, there exist C = C(q) and M = M(q) such that: if S is a finite quasisimple group with |S/Z(S)| >C, βj (j =1,... ,M) are any automorphisms of S, and qj (j =1,... ,M) are any divisors of q, then M qj there exist inner automorphisms αj of S such that S = 1 [S, (αjβj) ]. These results, which rely on the classification of finite simple groups, are needed to complete the proofs of the main theorems of Part I. 1. Introduction The main theorems of Part I [NS] were reduced to two results about finite quasisimple groups. These will be proved here. A group S is said to be quasisimple if S =[S, S] and S/Z(S) is simple, where Z(S) denotes the centre of S. For automorphisms α and β of S we write −1 −1 α β Tα,β(x, y)=x y x y . Theorem 1.1. There is an absolute constant D ∈ N such that if S is a finite quasisimple group and α1,β1,... ,αD,βD are any automorphisms of S then ····· S = Tα1,β1 (S, S) TαD ,βD (S, S).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae 911 Vol. LXXXVIII, 3 (2019), pp. 911{916 COSET GEOMETRIES WITH TRIALITIES AND THEIR REDUCED INCIDENCE GRAPHS D. LEEMANS and K. STOKES Abstract. In this article we explore combinatorial trialities of incidence geome- tries. We give a construction that uses coset geometries to construct examples of incidence geometries with trialities and prescribed automorphism group. We define the reduced incidence graph of the geometry to be the oriented graph obtained as the quotient of the geometry under the triality. Our chosen examples exhibit interesting features relating the automorphism group of the geometry and the automorphism group of the reduced incidence graphs. 1. Introduction The projective space of dimension n over a field F is an incidence geometry PG(n; F ). It has n types of elements; the projective subspaces: the points, the lines, the planes, and so on. The elements are related by incidence, defined by inclusion. A collinearity of PG(n; F ) is an automorphism preserving incidence and type. According to the Fundamental theorem of projective geometry, every collinearity is composed by a homography and a field automorphism. A duality of PG(n; F ) is an automorphism preserving incidence that maps elements of type k to elements of type n − k − 1. Dualities are also called correlations or reciprocities. Geometric dualities, that is, dualities in projective spaces, correspond to sesquilinear forms. Therefore the classification of the sesquilinear forms also give a classification of the geometric dualities. A polarity is a duality δ that is an involution, that is, δ2 = Id. A duality can always be expressed as a composition of a polarity and a collinearity.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-SPLIT REDUCTIVE GROUPS OVER Z Brian Conrad
    NON-SPLIT REDUCTIVE GROUPS OVER Z Brian Conrad Abstract. | We study the following phenomenon: some non-split connected semisimple Q-groups G admit flat affine Z-group models G with \everywhere good reduction" (i.e., GFp is a connected semisimple Fp-group for every prime p). Moreover, considering such G up to Z-group isomorphism, there can be more than one such G for a given G. This is seen classically for types B and D by using positive-definite quadratic lattices. The study of such Z-groups provides concrete applications of many facets of the theory of reductive groups over rings (scheme of Borel subgroups, auto- morphism scheme, relative non-abelian cohomology, etc.), and it highlights the role of number theory (class field theory, mass formulas, strong approximation, point-counting over finite fields, etc.) in analyzing the possibilities. In part, this is an expository account of [G96]. R´esum´e. | Nous ´etudions le ph´enom`ene suivant : certains Q-groupes G semi-simples connexes non d´eploy´es admettent comme mod`eles des Z-groupes G affines et plats avec \partout bonne r´eduction" (c'est `adire, GFp est un Fp- groupe Q-groupes G pour chaque premier p). En outre, consid´erant de tels G `a Z-groupe isomorphisme pr`es, il y a au plus un tel G pour un G donn´e.Ceci est vu classiquement pour les types B et D en utilisant des r´eseaux quadratiques d´efinis positifs. L'´etude de ces Z-groupes donne lieu `ades applications concr`etes d'aspects multiples, de la th´eorie des groupes r´eductifs sur des anneaux (sch´emas de sous-groupes de Borel, sch´emas d'automorphismes, cohomologie relative non ab´elienne, etc.), et met en ´evidence le r^ole de la th´eorie des nombres (th´eorie du corps de classes, formules de masse, approximation forte, comptage de points sur les corps finis, etc.) dans l'analyse des possibilit´es.En partie, ceci est un article d'exposition sur [G96].
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Blocks with a Klein Four Defect Group
    The Structure of Blocks with a Klein Four Defect Group David A. Craven, Charles W. Eaton, Radha Kessar, Markus Linckelmann April 2009 Abstract We prove Erdmann's conjecture [16] stating that every block with a Klein four defect group has a simple module with trivial source, and deduce from this that Puig's finiteness conjec- ture holds for source algebras of blocks with a Klein four defect group. The proof uses the classification of finite simple groups. 1 Introduction A conjecture of Puig states that for a given prime p and a finite p-group P there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of interior P -algebras arising as source algebras of p-blocks of finite groups with defect groups isomorphic to P . While Puig's conjecture has been verified for many classes of finite groups (cf. [25], [26], [29], [30], [31], [32], [41]), the case where P is cyclic has been to date the only case where this conjecture has been shown to hold in full generality (cf. [38]). Using the classification of the finite simple groups we show that Puig's conjecture holds for all blocks with a Klein four defect group. Theorem 1.1 Let O be a complete local Noetherian commutative ring with an algebraically closed residue field k of characteristic 2. Let G be a finite group and A a source algebra of a block of OG with a Klein four defect group P . Then A is isomorphic to one of OP , OA4 or the principal block algebra of OA5. In particular, there are exactly three isomorphism classes of source algebras of blocks with a Klein four defect group.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1801.08374V1 [Math.GR] 25 Jan 2018 AIA UGOP of SUBGROUPS MAXIMAL Pedx (2 Appendix: Remarks References Further Monster Baby the 22
    2 MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS OF E6(2) AND ITS AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS ROBERT A. WILSON Abstract. We give a new computer-assisted proof of the classification of max- 2 imal subgroups of the simple group E6(2) and its extensions by any subgroup of the outer automorphism group S3. This is not a new result, but no earlier proof exists in the literature. A large part of the proof consists of a computa- tional analysis of subgroups generated by an element of order 2 and an element of order 3. This method can be effectively automated, and via statistical anal- ysis also provides a sanity check on results that may have been obtained by delicate theoretical arguments. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Existence of the known maximal subgroups 2 3. Centralizers of outer automorphisms 3 4. p-local analysis for p 6=3 4 5. The 3-local subgroups 5 6. Listofknownconjugacyclassesofsimplesubgroups 8 7. Simple subgroups centralizing an element of order 7 8 8. Simple subgroups centralizing an element of order 5 11 9. Simple subgroups centralizing an element of order 3 12 10. Simple subgroups centralizing an involution 15 11. Simple subgroups of Fi22 15 12. Eliminating other isomorphism types of simple subgroups 16 13. Subgroups isomorphic to A5 17 14. Hurwitz groups 19 arXiv:1801.08374v1 [math.GR] 25 Jan 2018 15. Classifying (2, 3, 11) triples 21 16. Classifying (2, 3, 13) triples 23 17. Classifying (2, 3, 17) triples 27 18. Classifying (2, 3, 19) triples 33 19. Status report 33 20. Using the Monster 34 21. Using the Baby Monster 37 22.
    [Show full text]