Speculative Computing: Instruments for Interpretive Scholarship

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Speculative Computing: Instruments for Interpretive Scholarship S P E C U L A T I V E C O M P U T I N G : INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERPRETIVE SCHOLARSHIP Bethany Paige Nowviskie Charlottesville, Virginia B.A. University of Virginia, 1995 MA.Ed. Wake Forest University, 1996 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Virginia May 2004 ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/1.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 3 Abstract Like many modern humanities computing projects, Ramon Llull’s Ars Magna, a system of inscripted, manipulable wheels dating to the thirteenth century, asserts that interpretation can be aided by mechanism without being generated mathematically or mechanically. That this assertion is sometimes lost on the larger academic community is not simply a failure of the devices scholar-technologists produce (although, as the work outlined here seeks to demonstrate, we could do a better job of anticipating and incorporating patently interpretive or subjective forms of interaction on the part of our users into the systems we create for them). Instead, it betrays our failure to articulate the humanistic and hermeneutic value of algorithmic work to a lay audience. This dissertation uses Llull’s Ars Magna to introduce the relationships of algorithm, ars combinatoria, aesthetic provocation, diagrammatic reasoning, and ludic practice to the work of humanities scholarship and then presents two major case studies in the design of digital instruments and environments that open themselves to performance and intervention on the part of interpretive agents. The first is the Temporal Modelling PlaySpace, a composition tool for sketching subjective and inflected timelines that (like temporal relations in humanities data generally) are not necessarily unidirectional, homogenous, or continuous. Temporal Modelling’s innovation lies in its extraction for re-purposing of well-formed XML from users’ intuitively-designed and even 4 deliberately ambiguous diagrammatic models. The second case study deals with computational and interface or visualization strategies for turning problems in representing subjectivity and deixis into opportunities for critical engagement in the Ivanhoe Game, a ludic subset of the larger IVANHOE project, an interpretive role- playing environment conceived by Jerome McGann and Johanna Drucker. Both of these projects stem from work in progress at the University of Virginia’s Speculative Computing Laboratory. The goals and methods of SpecLab are demonstrated (and tested in performance) in a trio of creative design exercises or “imaginary solutions” which make use of ideas developed in chapters on Llull, Temporal Modelling, and the Ivanhoe Game — and “speculative computing” is introduced as a new paradigm for exploratory digital work in the humanities. 5 Preconditions “Freedom is compatible with necessity.” — from the journals of Gerard Manley Hopkins Essential Oils — are wrung – The Attar from the Rose Be not expressed by Suns — alone – It is the gift of Screws – Emily Dickinson (675, ca.1863) “Theories thus become instruments, not answers to enigmas, in which we can rest. We don’t lie back upon them, we move forward, and, on occasion, make nature over again by their aid. Pragmatism unstiffens all our theories, limbers them up and sets each one at work.” — William James, “What is Pragmatism?” (1904) 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................3 Preconditions.......................................................................................................................................5 TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................6 TABLE OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................10 I. Mechanism and Interpretation in Humanities Computing.................................................12 A. Llull’s Great Art .....................................................................................................................12 B. Performance and Interpretation..........................................................................................31 1. Algorithm .............................................................................................................................31 2. Aesthetic Provocation........................................................................................................39 3. The Ludic Algorithm.........................................................................................................55 C. Llull in Application.................................................................................................................66 1. A Crisis in Communication...............................................................................................66 2. Dynamic Diagrams.............................................................................................................70 3. A Qualitative Difference....................................................................................................74 IMAGINARY SOLUTION #1: Dr. Kremlin’s Disc...............................................................78 7 II. Temporal Modelling..................................................................................................................90 A. Project and Primitives...........................................................................................................90 B. Conventions and Contexts....................................................................................................96 C. PlaySpace Design....................................................................................................................99 1. Objects, Relations, Actions............................................................................................ 103 2. Inflecting Temporal Relations...................................................................................... 106 D. Digital Modelling as Interpretive Practice................................................................... 109 1. Modelling (in) the PlaySpace ........................................................................................ 109 2. Diagrammatic Reasoning............................................................................................... 114 3. Nowsliding: an Inner Standing Point ......................................................................... 126 E. Directions: A Cognitive Science Approach.................................................................... 135 F. The PlaySpace in Application........................................................................................... 143 IMAGINARY SOLUTION #2: Temporal Modelling at Sea............................................ 151 III. Subjectivity in the Ivanhoe Game: Visual and Computational Strategies............... 163 A. Introduction to the Game.................................................................................................. 163 B. Emergent Intersubjectivity ............................................................................................... 170 A Coded Message .................................................................................................................... 176 C. Computational Strategies................................................................................................... 177 ISP Industries.......................................................................................................................... 180 8 D. Subjectivity in Virtual Environments ............................................................................ 181 Code Fragment........................................................................................................................ 192 E. Subject-Oriented Programming....................................................................................... 195 F. Visualizing Interpretation ................................................................................................. 208 Bring Out Number Weight and Measure in a Year of Dearth.......................................... 214 G. Evolving Avatars................................................................................................................. 215 H. Intersubjective Discourse Fields ..................................................................................... 222 I. IVANHOE and Digital Scholarship ................................................................................. 228 Licensing Device ..................................................................................................................... 230 IMAGINARY SOLUTION #3: The Somehow May Be Thishow.................................. 232 IV. Coda: Speculative Computing.............................................................................................. 239 Appendix A. “Temporal Modelling: Conceptualization and Visualization of Temporal Relations for Humanities Scholarship”....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Querying Wikidata: Comparing SPARQL, Relational and Graph Databases
    Querying Wikidata: Comparing SPARQL, Relational and Graph Databases Daniel Hernández1, Aidan Hogan1, Cristian Riveros2, Carlos Rojas2, and Enzo Zerega2 Center for Semantic Web Research 1 Department of Computer Science, Universidad de Chile 2 Department of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Resource type: Benchmark and Empirical Study Permanent URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3219217 Abstract: In this paper, we experimentally compare the efficiency of various database engines for the purposes of querying the Wikidata knowledge-base, which can be conceptualised as a directed edge-labelled graph where edges can be annotated with meta-information called quali- fiers. We take two popular SPARQL databases (Virtuoso, Blazegraph), a popular relational database (PostgreSQL), and a popular graph database (Neo4J) for comparison and discuss various options as to how Wikidata can be represented in the models of each engine. We design a set of experiments to test the relative query performance of these representa- tions in the context of their respective engines. We first execute a large set of atomic lookups to establish a baseline performance for each test setting, and subsequently perform experiments on instances of more com- plex graph patterns based on real-world examples. We conclude with a summary of the strengths and limitations of the engines observed. 1 Introduction Wikidata is a new knowledge-base overseen by the Wikimedia foundation and collaboratively edited by a community of thousands of users [21]. The goal of Wikidata is to provide a common interoperable source of factual information for Wikimedia projects, foremost of which is Wikipedia. Currently on Wikipedia, articles that list entities – such as top scoring football players – and the info- boxes that appear on the top-right-hand side of articles – such as to state the number of goals scored by a football player – must be manually maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • A Logical Framework for Temporal Deductive Databases S
    A logical framework for temporal deductive databases S. M. Sripada Departmentof Computing Imperial College of Science& Technology 180 Queen’sGate, London SW7 2BZ Abstract researchers have incorporated time into conventional databasesusing various schemes Temporal deductive databases are deductive providing different capabilities for handling databaseswith an ability to representboth valid temporal information. In particular, work has time and transaction time. The work is basedon been done on adding temporal information to the Event Calculus of Kowalski & Sergot. Event conventionaldatabases to turn them into temporal Calculus is a treatment of time, based on the databases. However, no work is done on notion of events, in first-order classical logic handling both transaction time and valid time in augmentedwith negation as failure. It formalizes deductive databases.In this paper we propose a the semanticsof valid time in deductivedatabases framework for dealing with time in temporal and offers capability for the semantic validation deductivedatabases. of updates and default reasoning. In this paper, the Event Calculus is extended to include the Snodgrass dz Ahn [16,17] describe a concept of transaction time. The resulting classification of databasesdepending on their framework is capable of handling both proactive ability to represent temporal information. They and retroactive updates symmetrically. Error identify three different concepts of time - valid correction is achievedwithout deletionsby means time, transaction time and user-defined time. Of of negation as failure. The semantics of these, user-defined time is temporal transaction time is formalised and the axioms of information of some kind that is of interest to the the Event Calculus are modified to cater for user but does not concern a DBMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Processing Natural Language Arguments with the <Textcoop>
    Argument and Computation Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2012, 49–82 Processing natural language arguments with the <TextCoop> platform Patrick Saint-Dizier* IRIT-CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse, France (Received 15 June 2011; final version received 31 January 2012) In this article, we first present the <TextCoop> platform and the Dislog language, designed for discourse analysis with a logic and linguistic perspective. The platform has now reached a certain level of maturity which allows the recognition of a large diversity of discourse structures including general-purpose rhetorical structures as well as domain-specific discourse structures. The Dislog language is based on linguistic considerations and includes knowledge access and inference capabilities. Functionalities of the language are presented together with a method for writing discourse analysis rules. Efficiency and portability of the system over domains and languages are investigated to conclude this first part. In a second part, we analyse the different types of arguments found in several document genres, most notably: procedures, didactic texts and requirements. Arguments form a large class of discourse relations. A generic and frequently encountered form emerges from our analysis: ‘reasons for conclusion’ which constitutes a homogeneous family of arguments from a language, functional and conceptual point of view. This family can be viewed as a kind of proto-argument. We then elaborate its linguistic structure and show how it is implemented in <TextCoop>. We then investigate the cooperation between explanation and arguments, in particular in didactic texts where they are particularly rich and elaborated. This article ends with a prospective section that develops current and potential uses of this work and how it can be extended to the recognition of other forms of arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Metadata for Discovery
    Temporal Metadata for Discovery A review of current practice Makx Dekkers AMI Consult SARL Massimo Craglia (Editor) European Commission DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability EUR 23209 EN - 2008 The mission of the Institute for Environment and Sustainability is to provide scientific-technical support to the European Union’s Policies for the protection and sustainable development of the European and global environment. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Contact information Makx Dekkers Address: AMI Consult Société à responsabilité limitée B.P. 647 2016 Luxembourg E-mail: [email protected] Massimo Craglia (Editor) Address: European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit TP262, Via Fermi 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) ITALY E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-786269 Fax: +39-0332-786325 http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 42620 EUR 23209 EN ISSN 1018-5593 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities © European Communities, 2008 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy Table of contents 1 BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Dialogue Structure from Discourse Tree of a Question
    The Workshops of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Building Dialogue Structure from Discourse Tree of a Question Boris Galitsky Oracle Corp. Redwood Shores CA USA [email protected] Abstract ed, chat bot’s capability to maintain the cohesive flow, We propose a reasoning-based approach to a dialogue man- style and merits of conversation is an underexplored area. agement for a customer support chat bot. To build a dia- When a question is detailed and includes multiple sen- logue scenario, we analyze the discourse tree (DT) of an ini- tences, there are certain expectations concerning the style tial query of a customer support dialogue that is frequently of an answer. Although a topical agreement between ques- complex and multi-sentence. We then enforce what we call tions and answers have been extensively addressed, a cor- complementarity relation between DT of the initial query respondence in style and suitability for the given step of a and that of the answers, requests and responses. The chat bot finds answers, which are not only relevant by topic but dialogue between questions and answers has not been thor- also suitable for a given step of a conversation and match oughly explored. In this study we focus on assessment of the question by style, argumentation patterns, communica- cohesiveness of question/answer (Q/A) flow, which is im- tion means, experience level and other domain-independent portant for a chat bots supporting longer conversation. attributes. We evaluate a performance of proposed algo- When an answer is in a style disagreement with a question, rithm in car repair domain and observe a 5 to 10% im- a user can find this answer inappropriate even when a topi- provement for single and three-step dialogues respectively, in comparison with baseline approaches to dialogue man- cal relevance is high.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Granularity of Time in Temporal Databases
    DEALING WITH GRANULARITY OF TIME IN TEMPORAL DATABASES Gio Wiederhold t Department of Computer Science Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2140, U.S.A. Sushil Jajodia Department of Information Systems and Systems Engineering George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, U.S.A. Witold Litwin* I.N.R.I.A. 78153 Le Chesnay, France ABSTRACT A question that always arises when dealing with temporal informa- tion is the granularity of the values in the domain type. Many different approaches have been proposed; however, the community has not yet come to a basic agree- ment. Most published temporal representations simplify the issue which leads to difficulties in practical applications. In this paper, we resolve the issue of temporal representation by requiring two domain types (event times and intervals), formal- ize useful temporal semantics, and extend the relational operations in such a way that temporal extensions fit into a relational representation. Under these considera- tions, a database system that deals with temporal data can not only present con- sistent temporal semantics to users but perform consistent computational sequences on temporal data from diverse sources. 1. Introduction Large databases do not just collect data about the current state of objects but retain infor- marion about past states as well. In the past, when storage was costly, such data was often not retained online. Aggregations of past information might have been kept, and detail data was archived. Certain applications always required that an adequate history be kept. In medical data- base systems a record of past events is necessary to avoid repeating ineffective or inappropriate treatments, and in other applications legal or planning requirements make keeping of a history desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Centralized Ledger Database for Universal Audit and Verification
    LedgerDB: A Centralized Ledger Database for Universal Audit and Verification Xinying Yangy, Yuan Zhangy, Sheng Wangx, Benquan Yuy, Feifei Lix, Yize Liy, Wenyuan Yany yAnt Financial Services Group xAlibaba Group fxinying.yang,yuenzhang.zy,sh.wang,benquan.ybq,lifeifei,yize.lyz,[email protected] ABSTRACT certain consensus protocol (e.g., PoW [32], PBFT [14], Hon- The emergence of Blockchain has attracted widespread at- eyBadgerBFT [28]). Decentralization is a fundamental basis tention. However, we observe that in practice, many ap- for blockchain systems, including both permissionless (e.g., plications on permissioned blockchains do not benefit from Bitcoin, Ethereum [21]) and permissioned (e.g., Hyperledger the decentralized architecture. When decentralized architec- Fabric [6], Corda [11], Quorum [31]) systems. ture is used but not required, system performance is often A permissionless blockchain usually offers its cryptocur- restricted, resulting in low throughput, high latency, and rency to incentivize participants, which benefits from the significant storage overhead. Hence, we propose LedgerDB decentralized ecosystem. However, in permissioned block- on Alibaba Cloud, which is a centralized ledger database chains, it has not been shown that the decentralized archi- with tamper-evidence and non-repudiation features similar tecture is indispensable, although they have been adopted to blockchain, and provides strong auditability. LedgerDB in many scenarios (such as IP protection, supply chain, and has much higher throughput compared to blockchains. It merchandise provenance). Interestingly, many applications offers stronger auditability by adopting a TSA two-way peg deploy all their blockchain nodes on a BaaS (Blockchain- protocol, which prevents malicious behaviors from both users as-a-Service) environment maintained by a single service and service providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Time, Points and Space - Towards a Better Analysis of Wildlife Data in GIS
    Time, Points and Space - Towards a Better Analysis of Wildlife Data in GIS Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorw¨urde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Universit¨at Z¨urich von Stephan Imfeld von Lungern OW Begutachtet von Prof. Dr. Kurt Brassel Prof. Dr. Bernhard Nievergelt Dr. Britta Allg¨ower Prof. Dr. Peter Fisher Z¨urich 2000 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde von der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Universit¨at Z¨urich auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Kurt Brassel und Prof. Dr. Robert Weibel als Dissertation angenommen. How to Catch Running Animals with GIS and See What They’re up to i Abstract Geographical Information Systems are powerful instruments to analyse spatial data. Wildlife researchers and managers are always confronted with spatial data analysis and make use of these systems for various tasks. One important characteristic of the animals unter investigation is their locomotion. Thus the temporal aspects are important, but unfortunately GIS are almost ignorant concerning the analysis of the temporal domain. This thesis is trying to provide a new perspective on how to analyse moving point objects within GIS. A conceptual shift is performed from a space centered view to a way of analysing spatial and temporal aspects in an equally balanced way. For this purpose the family of analytical Time Plots was developed. They represent a completely new approach of how to analyse moving point objects. They transform the data originating from an animal’s movements into a repre- sentation with two time axes and one spatial axis that allows for an effective recognition of spatial patterns within the data.
    [Show full text]
  • SQL and Temporal Database Research: Unified Review and Future Directions
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 09 | Sep -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 SQL and Temporal Database Research: Unified Review and Future Directions Rose-Mary Owusuaa Mensah1, Vincent Amankona2 1Postgraduate Student, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana 2 Postgraduate Student, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Several attempts to incorporate temporal In the early 1990s, a renowned researcher in the database extensions into the Structured Query Language, SQL, one of community, Richard Snodgrass, proposed that temporal the most popular query languages for databases date back extensions to SQL be developed because few of them to the nineteenth and twentieth century. Although a lot of existed. In response to his proposal [1], a committee was work and research has been done on temporal databases formed to consolidate past research and suggestions from and SQL, there exist very limited literature clearly outlining the research community in order to design temporal the various events which have taken place with regards to extensions to the 1992 edition of the SQL standard. Those temporal extensions of SQL over the years till the present extensions, known as TSQL2, were then developed by this state in a concise document. Consequently, researchers need committee and in 1993, they presented proposals to the to gather several pieces of literature before they can obtain ANSI SQL Technical Committee. Based on responses to the a vivid pictorial timeline of the history and the current state proposals, changes were made to the Language, and the of these temporal extensions for research and software definitive version of the TSQL2 Language Specification development purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multi-Temporal Database of Planetary Image Data (Muted): New Features to Study Dynamic Mars
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1001.pdf THE MULTI-TEMPORAL DATABASE OF PLANETARY IMAGE DATA (MUTED): NEW FEATURES TO STUDY DYNAMIC MARS. T. Heyer1, H. Hiesinger1, D. Reiss1, J. Raack1, and R. Jaumann2, 1Institut für Planetologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10, 48149 Münster, Germany, 2German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany. ([email protected]) Introduction: The Multi-Temporal Database of Structure: MUTED is based on open source Planetary Image Data (MUTED) is a web-based tool to software and standards from the Open Geospatial support the identification of surface changes and time- Consortium (OGC). Metadata of the planetary image critical processes on Mars. The database enables scien- datasets are integrated from the Planetary Data System tists to quickly identify the spatial and multi-temporal (PDS) into a relational database (PostGreSQL). In coverage of orbital image data of all major Mars mis- order to provide the multi-temporal coverage, addi- sions. Since the 1970s, multi-temporal spacecraft tional information, e.g., the geometry, the number and observations have revealed that the martian surface is time span of overlapping images are derived for each very dynamic [e.g., 1-3]. The observation of surface image respectively. A Geoserver translates the metada- changes and processes, including eolian activity [e.g., ta stored in the relational database into web map ser- 5, 6], mass movement activities [e.g., 6, 7, 8], the vices (WMS) and web features services (WFS). Using growth and retreat of the polar caps [e.g., 9, 10], and Common Query Language (CQL), the web services crater-forming impacts [11] became possible by the can be filtered by date, solar longitude, spatial resolu- increasing number of repeated image acquisitions of tion, incidence angle, and spatial extend.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Web: a Review of the Field Pascal Hitzler [email protected] Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas, USA
    Semantic Web: A Review Of The Field Pascal Hitzler [email protected] Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas, USA ABSTRACT which would probably produce a rather different narrative of the We review two decades of Semantic Web research and applica- history and the current state of the art of the field. I therefore do tions, discuss relationships to some other disciplines, and current not strive to achieve the impossible task of presenting something challenges in the field. close to a consensus – such a thing seems still elusive. However I do point out here, and sometimes within the narrative, that there CCS CONCEPTS are a good number of alternative perspectives. The review is also necessarily very selective, because Semantic • Information systems → Graph-based database models; In- Web is a rich field of diverse research and applications, borrowing formation integration; Semantic web description languages; from many disciplines within or adjacent to computer science, Ontologies; • Computing methodologies → Description log- and a brief review like this one cannot possibly be exhaustive or ics; Ontology engineering. give due credit to all important individual contributions. I do hope KEYWORDS that I have captured what many would consider key areas of the Semantic Web field. For the reader interested in obtaining amore Semantic Web, ontology, knowledge graph, linked data detailed overview, I recommend perusing the major publication ACM Reference Format: outlets in the field: The Semantic Web journal,1 the Journal of Pascal Hitzler. 2020. Semantic Web: A Review Of The Field. In Proceedings Web Semantics,2 and the proceedings of the annual International of . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Knowledge Base Management: a Survey
    Automated Knowledge Base Management: A Survey Jorge Martinez-Gil Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) email: [email protected], phone number: 43 7236 3343 838 Keywords: Information Systems, Knowledge Management, Knowledge-based Technology Abstract A fundamental challenge in the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Databases consists of devel- oping methods to automatically manage Knowledge Bases which can serve as a knowledge source for computer systems trying to replicate the decision-making ability of human experts. Despite of most of tasks involved in the building, exploitation and maintenance of KBs are far from being trivial, signifi- cant progress has been made during the last years. However, there are still a number of challenges that remain open. In fact, there are some issues to be addressed in order to empirically prove the technology for systems of this kind to be mature and reliable. 1 Introduction Knowledge may be a critical and strategic asset and the key to competitiveness and success in highly dynamic environments, as it facilitates capacities essential for solving problems. For instance, expert systems, i.e. systems exploiting knowledge for automation of complex or tedious tasks, have been proven to be very successful when analyzing a set of one or more complex and interacting goals in order to determine a set of actions to achieve those goals, and provide a detailed temporal ordering of those actions, taking into account personnel, materiel, and other constraints [9]. However, the ever increasing demand of more intelligent systems makes knowledge has to be cap- tured, processed, reused, and communicated in order to complete even more difficult tasks.
    [Show full text]