Additions to Micrelephas Dognin, 1905 (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae; Crambinae), Including a New Species and a Key
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lepidoptera: Crambidae)
DOI:10.24394/NatSom.2011.19.235 Natura Somogyiensis 19 235-244 Ka pos vár, 2011 Revision of the Hungarian Euchromius Guenée, 1845 species (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) IMRE FAZEKAS Biology Dept. of Regiograf Institute, Majális tér 17/A, H–300 Komló, Hungary, E-mail: [email protected] FAZEKAS , I.: Revision of the Hungarian Euchromius Guenée, 1845 species (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Abstract: Hungarian Euchromius are revised and list of localities is provided. Structure of genitalia and mor- phological characteristics of wings are illustrated by figures. The habitats and Hungarian distribution of the species have been analysed, the latter shown on UTM-grid maps. The study is completed with references on the Hungarian distribution of the species. With 8 figures. Keywords: Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Euchromius, biology, habitat, distribution, Hungary. Introduction The world fauna of genus Euchromius is probably the best known among Crambinae since revisions after BLESZYNSZK I (1965), CAPPS (1966) and SC HOUTEN (1988, 1992). Two species of Euchromius are known to occur in Hungary (FAZEKAS 1996, PASTORÁL I S 2010) and 12 species in Europe (SLAMKA 2008). Knowledge of the biology and geo- graphical range is limited in Hungary. GOZMÁNY (1963) redescribed the diagnostic characters of the Hungarian species, and gave an account of what was known of their biology and distribution. According to SZENT -IVÁNY and UHR I K -MÉSZÁROS (1942), Euchromius superbellus (Zeller, 1849) is a problematical species in Hungary: „In der Sammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums befinden sich 2 Exemplar mit der Fundortsetikette: “Hung. coll. REBEL“ und 1 Exemplar mit dem Fundortszettel: “Hung. ANKER, coll. Rebel.“ GOZMÁNY (1963) showed later that no specimen of Euchromius superbellus is known from the actual territory of Hungary. -
Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) For: Euzophera Bigella
Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) for: Euzophera bigella June 2018 Summary and conclusions of the rapid PRA Euzophera bigella is a moth found in much of Europe and parts of Asia, whose larvae (caterpillars) feed inside a variety of fruit and under the bark of a number of species of tree. Though there have been several adults caught in light traps in the UK, such records are very scarce and there is no evidence this species is established in any part of this country. Following the rapid screening of E. bigella via the UK Plant Health Risk Register, this PRA was requested to further assess the potential risk to the UK. This rapid PRA shows: Risk of entry The pathway of fruit (and nuts) is considered moderately likely, with medium confidence. Larvae have previously been found in imported fruit in the UK. If larvae were able to complete development inside the fruit, emerging adults would be capable of flying off and locating new hosts. The pathway of larvae under the bark of older trees for planting is considered moderately likely, with medium confidence. Larvae under the bark of younger, smaller trees is assessed as unlikely with medium confidence, as infestations produce swellings and cracks in the bark which are more likely to be seen in smaller trees. The pathway of wood with bark is considered unlikely with low confidence. Confidence is low because a different species of Euzophera has recently travelled from the USA to Italy on this pathway. 1 The pathway of natural spread is considered very unlikely with low confidence. -
Lepidoptera of North America 5
Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains, -
Diapositiva 1
Naturalis Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de La Plata http://naturalis.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo Efectos letales y subletales de insecticidas sobre Bemisia tabaci y su principal parasitoide Eretmocerus mundus e impacto sobre aspectos comportamentales del mismo Francesena, Natalia Doctor en Ciencias Naturales Dirección: Schneider, Marcela Inés Co-dirección: Stadler, Teodoro Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo 2015 Acceso en: http://naturalis.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/id/20151210001424 Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Universidad Nacional de La Plata Facultad De Ciencias Naturales y Museo Efectos letales y subletales de insecticidas sobre Bemisia tabaci y su principal parasitoide Eretmocerus mundus e impacto sobre aspectos comportamentales del mismo Tesis Doctoral Lic. Natalia Francesena Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) (CCT La Plata - CONICET - UNLP) Directora: Dra. Marcela Inés Schneider Co-director: Dr. Teodoro Stadler 2015 Agradecimientos Al Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, por haber financiado el doctorado a través del otorgamiento de las becas que me permitieron desarrollar mis investigaciones. A la Dra. Marcela Schneider, mi directora de tesis y al Dr. Teodoro Stadler, mi co-director de tesis, por brindarme su experiencia en lo referente a estos estudios. A los miembros del jurado por sus valiosos aportes ya que han enriquecido la versión final de esta tesis doctoral. Al Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) por brindarme lugar de trabajo. A la Dirección Dras. Alda González y Graciela Navone, al personal administrativo (Aníbal y Gastón), técnicos (Guillermo, Emilio y Jorge) y a los colegas de los demás laboratorios. -
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume 38 1984 Number 3 Joumal of the Lepidopterists' Society 38(3). 1984. 149-164 SOD WEBWORM MOTHS (PYRALIDAE: CRAMBINAE) IN SOUTH DAKOTA B. McDANIEL,l G. FAUSKEl AND R. D. GUSTIN 2 ABSTRACT. Twenty-seven species of the subfamily Crambinae known as sod web worm moths were collected from South Dakota. A key to species has been included as well as their distribution patterns in South Dakota. This study began after damage to rangeland in several South Dakota counties in the years 1974 and 1975. Damage was reported from Cor son, Dewey, Harding, Haakon, Meade, Perkins, Stanley and Ziebach counties. An effort was made to determine the species of Crambinae present in South Dakota and their distribution. Included are a key for species identification and a list of species with their flight periods and collection sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Black light traps using the General Electric Fluorescent F ls T8 B1 15 watt bulb were set up in Brookings, Jackson, Lawrence, Minnehaha, Pennington and Spink counties. In Minnehaha County collecting was carried out with a General Electric 200 watt soft-glow bulb. Daytime collecting was used in several localities. Material in the South Dakota State University Collection was also utilized. For each species a map is included showing collection localities by county. On the maps the following symbols are used: • = collected by sweepnet. Q = collected by light trap. Key to South Dakota Cram binae 1a. Rs stalked .__ ... ___ .. __ ......................... _..... _ ................................. _._............................................. 2 lb. Rs arising directly from discal cell ................................................................. _............ _............ -
Tag Der Artenvielfalt 2018 in Weißbrunn, Ulten (Gemeinde Ulten, Südtirol, Italien)
Thomas Wilhalm Tag der Artenvielfalt 2018 in Weißbrunn, Ulten (Gemeinde Ulten, Südtirol, Italien) Keywords: species diversity, Abstract new records, Ulten, Val d’Ultimo, South Tyrol, Italy Biodiversity Day 2018 in Weißbrunn, Ulten Valley (municipality of Ultimo, South Tyrol, Italy) The 19 th Biodiversity Day in South Tyrol was held in the municipality of Ulten/Ultimo. A total of 886 taxa were found. Einleitung Der 19. Südtiroler Tag der Artenvielfalt wurde am 30. Juni 2018 im Talschluss von Ulten abgehalten. Wie in den Jahren zuvor oblag dem Naturmuseum Südtirol sowohl die Organisation im Vorfeld als auch die Koordination vor Ort. Begleitend zu den Felderhebungen der zahlreichen Fachleute (siehe einzelne Beiträge) war ein didakti- sches Rahmenprogramm vorgesehen, das eine vogelkundliche und eine naturkundliche Wanderung im Untersuchungsgebiet (Organisation: Nationalpark Stilfserjoch unter der Koordination von Ronald Oberhofer) sowie ein Kinder- und Familienprogramm im Nationalparkhaus Lahnersäge in St. Gertraud umfasste (Organisation und Durchführung durch die Mitarbeiterinnen des Naturmuseums Südtirol Johanna Platzgummer, Elisabeth Waldner und Verena Preyer). Für allgemeine Informationen (Konzept und Organisation) zum Tag der Artenvielfalt und insbesondere zur Südtiroler Ausgabe siehe HILPOLD & KRANEBITTER (2005) und SCHATZ (2016). Adresse der Autors: Thomas Wilhalm Naturmuseum Südtirol Bindergasse 1 I-39100 Bozen thomas.wilhalm@ naturmuseum.it DOI: 10.5281/ zenodo.3565390 Gredleriana | vol. 19/2019 247 | Untersuchungsgebiet Das Untersuchungsgebiet umfasste in seinem Kern die Flur „Weißbrunn“ im Talschluss von Ulten westlich der Ortschaft St. Gertraud, d.h. den Bereich zwischen dem Weißbrunnsee (Stausee) und der Mittleren Weißbrunnalm. Im Süden war das Gebiet begrenzt durch die Linie Fischersee-Fiechtalm-Lovesboden, im Nordwesten durch den Steig Nr. 12 östlich bis zur Hinteren Pilsbergalm. -
Developing Biodiverse Green Roofs for Japan: Arthropod and Colonizer Plant Diversity on Harappa and Biotope Roofs
20182018 Green RoofsUrban and Naturalist Urban Biodiversity SpecialSpecial Issue No. Issue 1:16–38 No. 1 A. Nagase, Y. Yamada, T. Aoki, and M. Nomura URBAN NATURALIST Developing Biodiverse Green Roofs for Japan: Arthropod and Colonizer Plant Diversity on Harappa and Biotope Roofs Ayako Nagase1,*, Yoriyuki Yamada2, Tadataka Aoki2, and Masashi Nomura3 Abstract - Urban biodiversity is an important ecological goal that drives green-roof in- stallation. We studied 2 kinds of green roofs designed to optimize biodiversity benefits: the Harappa (extensive) roof and the Biotope (intensive) roof. The Harappa roof mimics vacant-lot vegetation. It is relatively inexpensive, is made from recycled materials, and features community participation in the processes of design, construction, and mainte- nance. The Biotope roof includes mainly native and host plant species for arthropods, as well as water features and stones to create a wide range of habitats. This study is the first to showcase the Harappa roof and to compare biodiversity on Harappa and Biotope roofs. Arthropod species richness was significantly greater on the Biotope roof. The Harappa roof had dynamic seasonal changes in vegetation and mainly provided habitats for grassland fauna. In contrast, the Biotope roof provided stable habitats for various arthropods. Herein, we outline a set of testable hypotheses for future comparison of these different types of green roofs aimed at supporting urban biodiversity. Introduction Rapid urban growth and associated anthropogenic environmental change have been identified as major threats to biodiversity at a global scale (Grimm et al. 2008, Güneralp and Seto 2013). Green roofs can partially compensate for the loss of green areas by replacing impervious rooftop surfaces and thus, contribute to urban biodiversity (Brenneisen 2006). -
Argyriini (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) of Mississippi and Alabama with a Redescription of Argyria Rufisignella (Zeller)
7878 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 61(2), 2007, 78–83 ARGYRIINI (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) OF MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA WITH A REDESCRIPTION OF ARGYRIA RUFISIGNELLA (ZELLER) EDDA L. MARTINEZ AND RICHARD L. BROWN Mississippi Entomological Museum, Box 9775, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA email: [email protected] Abstract: The tribe Argyriini (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is represented in Alabama and Mississippi by seven species of Argyria and Urola, all of which are associated with grasslands and other open habitats. Argyria rufisignella is a rarely collected species previously reported from Texas, Florida, and North Carolina. A series of this species recently was collected at Bibb County Glades Preserve, Alabama, a floristically unique habitat. The imago, wing venation, and genitalia of A. rufisignella are illustrated for the first time, and new distributional records are reported. Diagnoses, distribution maps, and photographs are provided as well for the other Argyriini that occur in Alabama and Mississippi. Additional key words: Urola, distribution, grasslands, Bibb County Glades Preserve. Argyria Hübner and related genera in the Argyriini History (USNM). Only two other specimens of A. (Crambidae: Crambinae) are considered to be rufisignella are in the USNM, both collected at restricted to the New World (Landry 1995). Argyria Southern Pines, North Carolina. Kimball (1965) listed includes 38 species, of which seven occur in America a single record of A. rufisignella (as A. rileyella) from north of Mexico, primarily in the eastern states and Myrtle Grove, Florida, but this specimen could not be provinces (Klots 1983, Landry 1995, Landry 2003, located in the Florida State Collection of Arthropods Munroe 1995). -
Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe. -
Download This Article in PDF Format
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique. -
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes. -
County Genus Species Species Author Common
County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe Subfamily Family Superfamily Lee County Achatia distincta Hubner,1813 Distinct Quaker Orthosiini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acleris braunana (McDunnough, 1934) Tortricini Tortricinae Tortricidae Tortricoidea Lee County Acrobasis angusella Grote, 1880 Hickory Leafstem borer Moth Phycitini Phycitinae Pyralidae Pyraloidea Lee County Acrobasis palliolella Ragonot, 1887 Mantled Acrobasis Moth Phycitini Phycitinae Pyralidae Pyraloidea Lee County Acrobasis stigmella Dyar, 1908 Phycitini Phycitinae Pyralidae Pyraloidea Lee County Acrobasis tricolorella Grote, 1878 Destructive Pruneworm Moth Phycitini Phycitinae Pyralidae Pyraloidea Lee County Acrolophus arcanella (Clemens, 1849) (None) (None) Acrolophidae Tineoidea Lee County Acronicta exilis Grote, 1874 Exiled Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta funeralis Grote and Robinson, 1866 Funerary Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta haesitata (Grote, 1882) Hesitant Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta hamamelis Guenee, 1852 Witch Hazel Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta hasta Guenee, 1852 Speared Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta impleta Walker, 1856 Nondescript Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta increta Morrison, 1974 Raspberry Bud Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Lee County Acronicta interrupta