DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Operational Analysis of YCTD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Operational Analysis of YCTD Comprehensive Operational Analysis of YCTD FINAL REPORT March 22, 2021 This page intentionally left blank 2020 Comprehensive Operational Analysis of Yolo County Transportation District Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1-1 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Organization of This Report ..............................................................................1-2 Chapter 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................2-1 2.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 YCTD Service Area ...........................................................................................2-3 2.2 Transit Ridership and Productivity by Route ....................................................2 -11 2.3 Route Profiles ................................................................................................. 2-17 2.3.1 Local/Regular Routes .....................................................................................2 -18 Route 35 – Southport Local ............................................................................2 -18 Route 40 – West Sacramento Local ................................................................2 -20 Route 41 – West Sacramento Local ................................................................2 -22 Route 42A – Intercity Loop Clockwise with Airport Service ............................. 2-24 Route 42B – Intercity Loop Counter-clockwise with Airport Service ................ 2-26 Route 210 – West Woodland Local ................................................................. 2-28 Route 211 – West Woodland Local ................................................................. 2-30 Route 212 – East Woodland Local ..................................................................2 -32 Route 214 – East Woodland Local ..................................................................2 -34 Route 215 – Cache Creek Casino/Woodland ..................................................2 -36 Route 216 – Knights Landing/Woodland and Route 217 – Dunnigan/Yolo/Woodland ...........................................................2 -38 Route 220 – Davis/Winters/Vacaville ..............................................................2 -40 Route 240 – West Sacramento/Sacramento Shuttle .......................................2 -42 2.3.2 Commute Routes ............................................................................................ 2-44 Route 39 – Southport/Sacramento Commute ..................................................2 -44 Route 220C – Winters/Davis Commute ...........................................................2 -46 Route 241 – West Sacramento/Sacramento Commute ...................................2 -48 Route 242 – Woodland/Davis Commute .........................................................2 -50 Route 243 – Woodland/UC Davis Commute ...................................................2 -52 2.3.3 Express Routes .............................................................................................. 2-54 Route 43 – Davis/Sacramento Express ...........................................................2 -54 Route 43R – Sacramento/UC Davis Express ..................................................2 -56 Route 44 – South Davis/Sacramento Express ................................................2 -58 Route 45 – Woodland/Sacramento Express ....................................................2 -60 Route 45X – Woodland/Sacramento Express .................................................2 -62 Route 46 – Woodland/Sacramento Express ....................................................2 -64 Route 230 – West Davis/Sacramento Express ................................................2 -66 Route 232 – Davis/Sacramento Express .........................................................2 -68 Dan Boyle & Associates, Inc. Page i Yolobus Comprehensive Operational Analysis Table of Contents Chapter 3 FINANCIAL DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS ..........................................3-1 3.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Summary of YCTD Allocation Procedure ..........................................................3-1 3.2 Allocation Methods at Similar Systems in California ..........................................3-2 3.3 Detailed Allocation Methods at Peer Agencies .................................................3-2 3.4 Application of MBTA Example to YCTD ............................................................3-6 3.5 Proposed Methodology for Allocating Fixed Costs ............................................3-8 3.6 Summary ..........................................................................................................3-9 Chapter 4 ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY ANALYSIS ...................................................4-1 4.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Current Staffing and Organization .....................................................................4-1 4.2 Staffing Levels at Peer Agencies ......................................................................4-2 4.3 Opportunities to Enhance Efficiency and Improve the Customer Experience ....4-2 4.4 Summary of Administrative Recommendations .................................................4-4 Chapter 5 YOLOBUS SPECIAL REVIEW ..........................................................................5-1 5.0 Purposes of this Review ....................................................................................5-1 5.1 Yolobus Special as an ADA Complementary Paratransit Program ....................5-1 ADA Program Compliance ....................................................................5-1 ADA Compliance Discussion .................................................................5-3 5.2 Yolobus Special – Five-Year Performance Experience .....................................5-4 Recent Experience and Historical Trends ..............................................5-4 Additional Yolobus Special Performance Indicators ............................. 5-10 Additional Resources Associated with Yolobus Special ....................... 5-13 5.3 Spatial Analysis of Yolobus Special Operating Experience ............................. 5-14 5.4 Temporal Analysis of Yolobus Special Operations ..........................................5 -16 Trip Demand across the Day ...............................................................5 -16 On-Time Performance by Time of Day ................................................5 -17 Subscription versus Demand Trips ......................................................5 -19 5.5 Yolobus Special Moving Forward: Themes Suggested by this Review ........... 5-20 5.6 Potential Actions Suggested by this Review ....................................................5 -22 Chapter 6 PUBLIC OUTREACH ........................................................................................6-1 6.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................6-1 6.1 Stakeholder Meeting .........................................................................................6-1 6.2 Pop-up Workshops ...........................................................................................6-4 6.3 Virtual Workshop.............................................................................................6 -11 Chapter 7 SERVICE CONCEPTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................7-1 7.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................7-1 7.1 The Ridership-Oriented Alternative within the Current Budget ..........................7-3 7.2 The Ridership-Oriented Alternative with a 10 Percent Increase in Operating Costs ...................................................................................................7 -14 7.3 A Note on MicroTransit ...................................................................................7 -16 7.4 Summary of Impacts .......................................................................................7 -17 Dan Boyle & Associates, Inc. Page ii Yolobus Comprehensive Operational Analysis Table of Contents Chapter 8 REASSESS AND REPRIORITIZE COA RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................8-1 8.1 Original COA Service Recommendations .........................................................8-1 8.2 Yolobus Service Changes in Response to COVID-19 .......................................8-2 8.3 Reassess and Reprioritize COA Recommendations and Establish Priorities for a Service Recovery Plan ................................................................8 -20 8.3.1 Why Frequency ...............................................................................................8 -21 8.3.2 COVID-19 and Peak Period Travel Times .......................................................8 -22 8.4 Revised COA Recommendations and Proposed Service Recovery Plan .......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission's
    Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission’s Elderly & Disabled Transportation Advisory Committee (Also serves as the Social Service Transportation Advisory Council) AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING 1:30pm - 3:30pm Tuesday, November 5, 2019 Regional Transportation Commission Santa Cruz Office 1523 Pacific Avenue, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 (2nd Floor) 1. 1:30pm — Call to Order 2. 1:30pm — Introductions 3. 1:35pm — Oral communications 4. 1:40pm — Additions or deletions to the consent or regular agenda 1:42pm- CONSENT AGENDA All items appearing on the consent agenda are considered to be minor or non-controversial and will be acted upon in one motion if no member of the E&D TAC or public wishes an item be removed and discussed on the regular agenda. Members of the E&D TAC may raise questions, seek clarification or add directions to Consent Agenda items without removing the item from the Consent Agenda as long as no other E&D TAC member objects to the change. 5. Approve Minutes from August 13, 2019 — pg.5 6. Receive Transportation Development Act Revenues Report — pg.9 7. Receive RTC Meeting Highlights — pg.11 8. Appointments - None 9. Receive Information Items — pg.13 a. Letter from Commission of Disabilities to County Board of Supervisors Regarding Santa Cruz Metro Board of Directors Membership Criteria, June 12, 2019 b. Mark Swobodzinski & Amy Park, “Electronic Opportunities for Visually Impaired Travelers”, August 2019 c. Josh Cohen, “Seattle's 'microtransit' experiment drives people to light rail. Is it working?,” Streets Blog, August 22, 2019 d. Tony Nunez, “Plan to revitalize downtown Watsonville is in the works”, Register Pajaronian, September 27, 2019 e.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Campus Setting
    2201, 2241 & 2251 HARVARD STREET, SACRAMENTO TWO PLANNED BUILDINGS THREE EXISTING BUILDINGS UNIQUE CAMPUS 250,000 SF 300,000 SF SETTING www.harvardparkoffice.com The ±23.6 acre Harvard Park corporate campus is HIGHLIGHTS in a prime location just outside of downtown Sac- > 117,000 SF available for lease in existing buildings ramento. It features two Class A, LEED Gold Cer- tified mid-rise office buildings totaling 280,000 > Two buildings, 250,000 SF, available in Phase II square feet, two planned, fully entitled buildings > Unique campus setting just minutes from totaling 250,000 square feet, a 15,000 square foot, Downtown single-story office building, a 1,034-stall parking > Immediate access to Business I-80 and structure and a 10,000 square foot fitness center. Highway 160 It is a likely target for public and private sector ten- > Adjacent to Light Rail stop with link to Downtown ants seeking the efficiency of larger floorplates and Sacramento and outlying areas build-to-suit opportunities. The campus is easily ac- > LEED Gold Certification cessible via Business I-80 and Highway 160 as well > On-site La Bou Café as the regional light rail system and is close to some > 10,000 SF fitness center with showers, lockers, of the region’s most desirable retail centers and steam and sauna rooms restaurants. > Bocce ball court, horse shoe pits and outdoor picnic pavilion > Dedicated property management, maintenance and engineering > Covered 1,000 stall parking garage > Adjacent to Arden Fair Regional Mall (Macy’s, BJ’s, California Pizza Kitchen,
    [Show full text]
  • SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017
    Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 BIG ASORPTION AT DELTA SHORES, REST OF MARKET STABLE HEADING INTO HOLIDAYS Net absorption was well above average for Q3, but with the majority of new occupants taking newly constructed space, the overall vacancy rate hardly budged. A number of big box vacancies remain unfilled, but new developments are pushing average asking rates, the biggest shift evident in the vicinity of Downtown Commons and the new Delta Shores along I-5. The first new stores at these two major development sites have opened in the last 90 days or will open before the end of 2017. Meanwhile, the rest of the market has remained relatively stable, with no major retailers exiting or entering the market. Investors from outside the Sacramento market have been active, as properties in this market offer cap rates more than 100 basis points higher than Bay Area and Southern California markets and more than 50 basis points above the average for the Western region. Net Absorption Community Power > 373,290 square feet of positive net absorption was more than Market Indicators Neighborhood Regional Specialty Strip two times the three-year rolling average per quarter. Relative to prior period 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 > Roughly 60 percent of the absorption total came from new VACANCY Delta Shores tenants, including Dick’s Sporting Goods, PetSmart and Ross Dress for Less. NET ABSORPTION CONSTRUCTION Vacancy RENTAL RATE > The overall vacancy declined 10 basis points to 9.4 percent. > About a dozen notable big box vacancies (including Macy’s, Note: Construction is the change in SF Under construction Sports Authority, and Borders) comprise 12.6 percent of the total vacant square footage or 1.2 percent of the total market inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey Bay Area Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
    Monterey Bay Area Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan Approved by the AMBAG Board of Directors October 2013 Prepared by: Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Services and Providers ....................................................................................... 3 A. Regional ............................................................................................................................. 6 B. San Benito County .............................................................................................................. 7 C. Santa Cruz County ............................................................................................................ 10 D. Monterey County ............................................................................................................. 13 III. Human Services Transportation Needs .................................................................................... 16 A. Regional ............................................................................................................................ 16 B. San Benito County ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Specific Plan Virtual Community Dialogue Supplement to the Summary of Feedback – Other/Please Specify Comments April 2017
    Downtown Specific Plan Virtual Community Dialogue Supplement to the Summary of Feedback – Other/Please Specify Comments April 2017 Introduction To supplement the Virtual Community Dialogue – Summary of Feedback, the full list of comments in response to “Other” or “Please Specify” prompts is compiled below. Demographic Information What would get you to move Downtown? Comments: The ability to own a loft; a co-op housing development which provides for ownership; an artist community with home ownership. Own a Victorian in Sacramento. Retired to North Natomas. Needed ground level housing and less walking due to health. I'm very close already. Curtis Park. Noise control. We left our home at 15th and U street because of all the loud motorcycles and vehicles without mufflers-I couldn’t take the noise. Also, the building next to the light rail was poisoning pigeons and they would land on our deck suffering and I couldn't watch it anymore and the building wouldn't stop putting out poison. Those two things were the last straw - if the city would start regulating use of poison (please ban it - rats are eaten by birds and cats - poisons are too indiscriminate!) and having city police fine people for too loud vehicles I would consider coming back, but I can't live there if I cannot sleep or feel at peace. More housing options and public outdoor spaces. Appropriate housing. More affordable housing prices. I couldn't afford to buy a house in downtown. Nothing. I like my neighborhood. Downtown is an area I visit but wouldn't want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • YCTD 2019August Minutes
    AGENDA If requested, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact Kathy Souza, Executive Assistant, for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should telephone or otherwise contact Kathy Souza as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Kathy Souza may be reached at telephone number (530) 402-2819 or at the following address: 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776. It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Yolo County Transportation District to encourage participation in the meetings of the Board of Directors. At each open meeting, members of the public shall be provided with an opportunity to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Directors. Please fill out a speaker card and give it to the Board Clerk if you wish to address the Board. Speaker cards are provided on a table by the entrance to the meeting room. Depending on the length of the agenda and number of speakers who filled out and submitted cards, the Board Chair reserves the right to limit a public speaker’s time to no more than three (3) minutes, or less, per agenda item.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Services Transportation Plan Update for the San Francisco Bay Area
    Coordinated Public Transit– Human Services Transportation Plan Update for the San Francisco Bay Area March 2013 Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607 TEL: 510.817.5700 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB: www.mtc.ca.gov MTC COMMISSIONERS MANAGEMENT STAFF Adrienne J. Tissier, Chair Steve Heminger San Mateo County Executive Director Amy Rein Worth, Vice Chair Ann Flemer Cities of Contra Costa County Deputy Executive Director, Policy Tom Azumbrado Andrew B. Fremier U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Deputy Executive Director, Operations Tom Bates Cities of Alameda County PROJECT STAFF David Campos City and County of San Francisco Alix Bockelman Director, Programming and Allocations Dave Cortese Santa Clara County Ken Kirkey Director, Planning Bill Dodd Napa County and Cities Jennifer Yeamans Project Manager Dorene M. Giacopini U.S. Department of Transportation Drennen Shelton Transportation Service Provider Inventory and Outreach Federal D. Glover Contra Costa County Stella Wotherspoon GIS Analysis and Mapping Scott Haggerty Alameda County AMMA Transit Planning Anne W. Halsted Demographic Research and Mapping (GISWS), Best Practices San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Research, Veterans Transportation Needs, Transportation Commission Service Provider Inventory Update Steve Kinsey This Plan update based on work originally completed by Marin County and Cities Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates in developing the 2007 MTC Coordinated Public Transit–Human Services Sam Liccardo Transportation Plan Elderly & Disabled Component San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Jake Mackenzie Sonoma County and Cities COORDINATED PLAN UPDATE TECHNICAL ADVISORY Joe Pirzynski COMMITTEE Cities of Santa Clara County Paul Branson Jean Quan Marin Transit Oakland Mayor’s Appointee Patrick Finan Bijan Sartipi U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District’S Bylaws to Reflect Metro Board’S Decision Not to Hold a Regular Meeting During the Month of July
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 2010 *WATSONVILLE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS* *275 MAIN STREET* WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 noon THE BOARD AGENDA PACKET CAN BE FOUND ONLINE AT WWW.SCMTD.COM OR AT METRO’S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE LOCATED AT 110 VERNON STREET, SANTA CRUZ, CA NOTE: THE BOARD CHAIR MAY TAKE ITEMS OUT OF ORDER SECTION I: OPEN SESSION - 9:00 a.m. 1. ROLL CALL 2. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3. LABOR ORGANIZATION COMMUNICATIONS 4. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT EXISTING AGENDA ITEMS CONSENT AGENDA 5-1. ACCEPT AND FILE PRELIMINARILY APPROVED CLAIMS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2010 5-2. ACCEPT AND FILE MONTHLY BUDGET STATUS REPORTS FOR AUGUST 2010 AND APPROVAL OF BUDGET TRANSFERS 5-3. CONSIDERATION OF TORT CLAIMS: REJECT THE CLAIM OF MARY SIERRA, #10-0034 5-4. ACCEPT AND FILE PARACRUZ OPERATIONS STATUS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2010 5-5. ACCEPT AND FILE RIDERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 5-6. ACCEPT AND FILE HIGHWAY 17 STATUS REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 5-7. ACCEPT AND FILE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ MONTHLY SERVICE REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 5-8. ACCEPT AND FILE MAC AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 17, 2010, AND MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 MEETING Regular Board Meeting Agenda November 19, 2010 Page 2 5-9. APPROVE REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 22, 2010 AND SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS MINUTES OF OCTOBER 22 AND 29, 2010 5-10. ACCEPT AND FILE MINUTES REFLECTING VOTING RESULTS FROM APPOINTEES TO THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 2010 MEETING(S) 5-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Neighborhood: America-$ Sports Stadiums Are Moving Downtown
    Welcome to the Neighborhood: America's Sports Stadiums Are Moving... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/business/sports-arena-development. .. r£btNtw§orkr£imts https://nyti.ms/2FSHOT8 "Welcome to the Neighborhood: America-$ Sports Stadiums Are Moving Downtown By Keith Schneider Jan. 19, 2018 SACRAMENTO - Hours before the Sacramento Kings played their N.B.A. home opener in October, Vivek Ranadive stood on the balcony of the team's new fourth­ floor office at the $1 billion Downtown Commons. He watched hoops fans stream into the year-old Golden 1 Center. He smiled at guests swimming in the rooftop pool of the brand new, 250-room Kimpton Sawyer Hotel. Below him, the open-air plaza at street level bustled with life. "Four years ago, this place was dead," said Mr. Ranadive, referring to downtown Sacramento, the capital city of the most-populous state in the union. Like many cities, Sacramento's urban core needed some serious rethinking. "You could have thrown a bowling ball," he said, "and it wouldn't have hit a soul." No longer. Three years after Mr. Ranadive, the owner of the Kings, partnered with the city to scrape away a nearly empty downtown mall, and a year after he opened the arena and the I-million-square-foot commons, Sacramento is a city reborn. The number of downtown jobs has increased 38 percent, according to the Downtown Sacramento Partnership, a city economic development group. In the last year, 27 new stores have opened and 23 others are scheduled to open this year. So much construction is happening that the city has decided to hire two dozen new employees to process applications and building permits.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information San Jose Diridon Transit Center San Jose
    Transit SANTA CRUZ Amtrak Thruway Information GA Santa Clara Valley Schedule Information e ective February 8, 2021 Amtrak Capitol Corridor Monterey-Salinas Transit Santa Cruz METRO operates San Jose Transportation Authority Capitol Corridor intercity rail operates the Monterey-San Jose the Highway 17 Express, an inter- Times are approximate (VTA) provides bus, light rail, and serves 18 stations along a 170- Express service, an interagency county express service between San Jose Diridon paratransit service throughout Santa Clara & Santa Clara & Santa Clara & Santa Clara & San Jose Diridon Bus Stops mile rail corridor, and offers a express service, under an Santa Cruz and San Jose, under Montgomery Cahill Montgomery Cahill Light Rail Station convenient way to travel between the agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Diridon Transit Santa Clara County and to Milpitas an agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Bus Stop Bus Stop Bus Stop Bus Stop Sierra Foothills, Sacramento, the San Transportation Authority and the Capitol BART, Berryessa BART, and Caltrain Transportation Authority, San Joaquin Routes Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley/San Corridor Joint Powers Authority. For more Joint Powers Authority and the Capitol stations. For more information visit vta.org, Route Route Route Route Route Route Route Route Route Green 64A Jose. For information call 1-877-9-RIDECC information call 1-888-MST-BUS1 or visit Corridor Joint Powers Authority. For more Center or call 408-321-2300 or 408-321-2330 (TTY). 22 22 522 522 64A 64B 68 168 500 Line 64B or visit capitolcorridor.org. www.mst.org. information go to www.scmtd.com or call RD, CO, GA, SJD to to to to 1-831-425-8600.
    [Show full text]
  • VTA Fares Took Effect in 2009, When VTA Increased the Base Fare from $1.75 to $2.00 and Also Raised Eco Pass Fares by Approximately 20%
    Administration and Finance Committee Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:00 PM VTA Conference Room B-106 3331 North First Street San Jose, CA ADDENDUM TO AGENDA 24.X. ACTION ITEM – Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Special Event Service Policy. ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:00 PM VTA Conference Room B-106 3331 North First Street San Jose, CA AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Committee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on a subsequent agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. 3. ORDERS OF THE DAY CONSENT AGENDA 4. ACTION ITEM -Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2017. 5. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors review and accept the Fiscal Year 2017 Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the period ending March 31, 2017. 6. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to purchase Property and Casualty insurance coverage for General and Auto Liability, Public Officials & Employment Practices Liability, Cyber Liability, Environmental Impairment & Pollution Liability, Crime, Blanket Railroad Protective Liability, and Property Insurance renewing the annual Operations Insurance Program for Fiscal Year 2018 for an amount not to exceed $3,500,000.
    [Show full text]