Opsahl Steigen,Ragnhild.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Opsahl Steigen,Ragnhild.Pdf University of Stavanger Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER'S THESIS Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, 2011 Master's Degree Program in Mechanical and Structural Engineering - Civil Engineering Open Writer: Ragnhild Opsahl Steigen ~.tJ.hiM..O.f.&J!J~-~-- ... (Y{riter's signature) F acuity supervisor: Jasna Bogunovic Jakobsen External supervisor: Roger Guldvik Ebeltoft Title of thesis: Modeling and analyzing a suspension bridge in light of deterioration of the main cable wires Credits (ECTS): 30 Keywords: Pages: ..... 9.9 ......... Suspension bridge Steel bridge + enclosure: ..1.0 1.. Eigen value analysis Structural engineering Stavanger, JJ(h.~~.(f. ... Date/year Modeling and analyzing a suspension bridge in light of deterioration of the main cable wires Ragnhild Opsahl Steigen Master thesis in structural and material engineering University of Stavanger, spring 2011 Preface The master thesis is the final part of my Master degree in structural and material science at the University of Stavanger. The thesis consists of collecting and studying data for Lysefjord Bridge in light of the deterioration of the main cables, and to carry out some analysis for the bridge. Data is given from The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (Statens Vegvesen). The data is used to make a finite element model (FEM) of the bridge in ABAQUS. The model is analyzed with emphasis on eigen frequencies and mode shapes. A brief analysis of the bridge behavior during wind loading is also carried out. The wire fractures observed in the main cables are summarized and analyzed with respect to the weather conditions in the area in a period with many wire fractures. Data on the weather in the area is given from Lysefjord Weather Station, that was contacted during the work with this thesis. The thesis consists of; • a presentation of the static and dynamic characteristics of a suspension bridge • a summary of the wire fractures in the main cables on Lysefjord Bridge • a weather analysis for periods with many wire fractures • the modeling of a finite element model in ABAQUS • an eigen value analysis and a brief wind analysis of the finite element model in ABAQUS • a verification of the finite element model in ABAQUS by theoretical calculations Thanks to the thesis supervisor at University of Stavanger, Jasna Bogunovic Jakobsen, and to Ove Mikkelsen for help with building the finite element model in ABAQUS. I also want to thank Roger Guldvik Ebeltoft in The Norwegian Public Roads Administration for information around the problem, and Per Slyngstad, also in The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, for results of the bridge model and analysis in Alvsat, and for the information used to build the model of the bridge in ABAQUS. Thanks also to Ole Tom Guse in Lysefjord Weather station for data on the weather near Lysefjord Bridge. ii Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Suspension bridges 4 2.1 Stiffening girder . 5 2.2 Main cables . 6 2.3 Hanger cables . 7 2.4 Towers . 7 2.5 Anchor piers . 7 3 Fracture of wires in the main cables 9 3.1 The main cables . 9 3.2 Possible reasons for wire fractures . 10 3.3 SoundPrint® acoustic monitoring . 12 3.4 Wire fractures detected visually . 13 3.5 Monitored wire fractures . 15 3.6 Weather around Lysefjord Bridge . 16 3.7 Maintenance and replacement of cables . 18 3.8 Wire fractures in similar bridges . 19 4 Finite element model of Lysefjord Bridge 22 4.1 ABAQUS software . 22 4.2 ABAQUS model . 23 4.2.1 Definition of directions . 23 4.2.2 Elements . 23 4.2.3 Geometry . 29 4.2.4 Conditions . 30 4.2.5 Stiffness properties . 31 4.2.6 Other parameters . 31 5 Applying load in the finite element model 32 5.1 Mass . 32 5.2 Modeling of mass . 33 5.3 Analysis of characteristic dead load . 35 5.4 Wind . 36 5.4.1 Static wind loading . 36 5.4.2 Mean wind speed . 38 5.4.3 Simulated wind load in ABAQUS . 39 5.4.4 Dynamic wind loading . 40 5.4.5 Non-linear geometric effects . 42 iii 5.5 Other loads . 42 5.5.1 Earthquake . 42 5.5.2 Traffic . 43 6 Results from the analysis in ABAQUS 44 6.1 General . 44 6.2 Eigenfrequencies and eigenmodes . 45 6.2.1 Eigenfrequencies . 45 6.2.2 Comparison of the eigenfrequencies in Alvsat and ABAQUS . 46 6.2.3 Comparison of the eigenmodes in Alvsat and ABAQUS . 47 6.2.4 Horizontal displacement of the cables . 55 6.2.5 Coupling of the directions . 57 6.3 Displacement due to dead load . 64 6.4 Displacement due to wind load . 64 6.5 Stress due to dead load and wind load . 66 7 Validation of eigenfrequencies and vibration modes 68 7.1 Vertical eigenfrequencies and modes . 68 7.1.1 Vertical asymmetric modes . 69 7.1.2 Vertical symmetric modes . 71 7.2 Torsion eigenfrequencies and modes . 73 7.2.1 Torsion symmetric modes . 73 7.2.2 Torsion asymmetric modes . 75 7.3 Eigenfrequencies from calculations . 76 8 Conclusion 78 9 Further recommendations 80 Appendices A Figures B Calculations C ABAQUS List of Figures 2.1 The main components of a suspension bridge shown on Lysefjord Bridge [7] 4 2.2 Akashi Kaikyo Bridge is the world’s longest suspension bridge [6] . 5 2.3 The cross section of the bridge girder in Lysefjord Bridge [7] . 6 3.1 The cross section of the main cable in Lysefjord Bridge [7] . 9 3.2 The surface defects detected on one examined Z-wire from Lysefjord Bridge [28] . 11 3.3 The fracture surface of one examined Z-wire from Lysefjord Bridge [28] . 12 3.4 Amount of fractures in each of the twelve cables from the opening of the bridge Dec. 1997 to Oct. 2010 . 14 3.5 Cable arrangement in Lysefjord Bridge . 14 3.6 Accumulated wire fractures from the opening of the bridge Dec. 1997 to Oct. 2010 . 15 3.7 Amount of wire fractures recorded by Advitam Oct. 09 to Mar. 11 [2] . 16 3.8 Daily fractures during the period from Oct. to Jan. 2009 and 2010 [2] . 17 3.9 Lysefjord weather station is stationed in Forsand [11] . 18 3.10 Amount of wire fractures, average temperature and maximum mean wind speed recorded Dec. 2009 . 20 3.11 Amount of wire fractures, average temperature and maximum mean wind speed recorded Dec. 2010 . 21 4.1 Real and fictive directions of the bridge [7] . 23 4.2 System of coordinates in ABAQUS . 24 4.3 General ABAQUS model of the bridge girder . 24 4.4 Bridge girder with dimensions . 25 4.5 Directions in the model, seen from south . 25 4.6 Dummy nodes to link the hangers to the bridge girder in ABAQUS . 26 4.7 The shape of the bridge girder when dead load is applied . 26 4.8 The shape of the main cables when the dead load is applied . 27 4.9 The hangers in the ABAQUS model . 28 5.1 Modeling of mass of bridge girder in ABAQUS . 33 5.2 Fictive points to attach m1 = 1454 kg/m under NA in ABAQUS . 34 5.3 The model of the bridge with dead load applied . 35 5.4 Positive directions for the forces, and the orientation of the wind. 37 5.5 Dummy elements to simulate wind on the bridge girder in ABAQUS . 40 5.6 Vortex shedding around the bridge girder [16] . 41 6.1 Horizontal symmetric modes . 49 6.2 Horizontal asymmetric modes . 50 v 6.3 Vertical symmetric modes . 51 6.4 Vertical asymmetric modes . 52 6.5 Torsional symmetric modes . 53 6.6 Torsional asymmetric modes . 54 6.7 Horizontal symmetric modes, displacement in girder and cables . 55 6.8 Horizontal asymmetric modes, displacement in girder and cables . 56 6.9 Horizontal symmetric mode, coupled . 58 6.10 Horizontal asymmetric mode, coupled . 59 6.11 Vertical symmetric mode, coupled . 60 6.12 Vertical asymmetric mode, coupled . 61 6.13 Torsional symmetric mode, coupled . 62 6.14 Torsional asymmetric mode, coupled . 63 6.15 The directions of the wind loading on the bridge girder . 64 6.16 Displacement of the bridge girder when the loading from a mean wind speed of 38 m/s is applied, where H, V and T is horizontal, vertical and torsion respectively . 65 6.17 The displacement of the bridge girder due to a mean wind in the cen- ter(node 19 at L/2) . 67 6.18 Stress in the cables near the towers when dead load and wind load is applied 67 7.1 First and second vertical asymmetric modes from the analytical calculations 70 7.2 First and second vertical asymmetric modes from ABAQUS and Alvsat . 71 7.3 First and second vertical symmetric modes from the analytical calculations 72 7.4 First and second vertical symmetric modes from ABAQUS and Alvsat . 73 7.5 First and second torsion symmetric modes from the analytical calculations 75 7.6 First and second torsion symmetric modes from ABAQUS and Alvsat . 75 7.7 First and second torsion asymmetric modes from the analytical calculations 76 7.8 First and second torsion asymmetric modes from ABAQUS and Alvsat . 76 List of Tables 4.1 Stiffness properties for Lysefjord Bridge . 31 5.1 Mass of Lysefjord Bridge . ..
Recommended publications
  • The Anason Family in Rogaland County, Norway and Juneau County, Wisconsin Lawrence W
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Faculty Publications Library Faculty January 2013 The Anason Family in Rogaland County, Norway and Juneau County, Wisconsin Lawrence W. Onsager Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/library-pubs Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Onsager, Lawrence W., "The Anason Family in Rogaland County, Norway and Juneau County, Wisconsin" (2013). Faculty Publications. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/library-pubs/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Faculty at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ANASON FAMILY IN ROGALAND COUNTY, NORWAY AND JUNEAU COUNTY, WISCONSIN BY LAWRENCE W. ONSAGER THE LEMONWEIR VALLEY PRESS Berrien Springs, Michigan and Mauston, Wisconsin 2013 ANASON FAMILY INTRODUCTION The Anason family has its roots in Rogaland County, in western Norway. Western Norway is the area which had the greatest emigration to the United States. The County of Rogaland, formerly named Stavanger, lies at Norway’s southwestern tip, with the North Sea washing its fjords, beaches and islands. The name Rogaland means “the land of the Ryger,” an old Germanic tribe. The Ryger tribe is believed to have settled there 2,000 years ago. The meaning of the tribal name is uncertain. Rogaland was called Rygiafylke in the Viking age. The earliest known members of the Anason family came from a region of Rogaland that has since become part of Vest-Agder County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stavanger Region
    THE REGION AND LYSEFJORD ACB STORD Sunde Odda & Bergen TEGNFORKLARING LEGEND E 39 13 Sagvåg BERGEN 48 Siggjarvåg Ranavik Utaker TURISTINFORMASJON 175 km Leirvik D Bremnes N Røldal E 134 TOURIST INFORMATION MAPS Matre A L OSLO NORWAY A D N Skjersholmane D A NASJONALE TURISTVEGER BØMLO Sydnes R L Røldal kr O K NATIONAL TOURIST ROUTES 48 A Skisenter R 1 Valevåg H G A 1 Skånevik O M R E BADING Mosterhamn L Utbjoa 13 E BATHING den T BERGEN jor Holmavatnet laf TURISTVEG 2 m Etne UTSIKT Bø E 39 RYFYLKE Nesflaten Langevågen Sauda SCENIC VIEW Buavåg 520 RYFYLKEVEGEN Ølen Århus Sandvatnet CAMPINGPLASS Tengesdal CAMPING SITE Sandeid R NORTH SEA ROAD E 134 E BOBIL SERVICESENTER 47 D & TØMMING Ropeid Tangen Hylen G Mostølen A MOBILE HOME SERVICE - Vikedal 140 km 46 Suldalsvatnet T CENTRE 15 12 Suldal S Røværsholmen n U SKI TERRENG d e Sand A V i n d a f j o r SKIING AREAS HAUGESUND Vormestrand LAKSESAFARI Aksdal Gullingen FYRTÅRN 2 Marvik 2 2 E 39 Sandsavatnet LIGHTHOUSE Nedstrand 13 Hebnes 1 STAVANGER LUFTHAVN Helganes RYFYLKEVEGEN Utsira STAVANGER AIRPORT KARMØY Erøy Vindsvik Kårstø Foldøy Jelsa BJERGØY Blåsjø 2 HAUGESUND LUFTHAVN UTSIRA OMBO Kopervik 6 Nesheim Nesvik HAUGESUND AIRPORT SJERNARØY Skipavik Føresvik 5 Eidssund 47 KYRKJØY Helgøysund 16 MOTORVEI BOKN MOTORWAY FINNØY Judaberg RANDØY Hjelmeland Svartevatn Arsvågen Halsnøy RYFYLKE 105 km Fister EUROPAVEI Skudeneshavn RENNESØY Ladstein EUROPEAN ROAD Mortavika kr Nes = DISTRICT MAP Hanasand FYLKESVEI med Fogn Årdal Nilsebu NATUROPPLEVELSE Vikaholmane Talgje Godfardalen PRIMARY ROUTES with
    [Show full text]
  • UNFC Case Studies from Finland/Estland, Sweden and Norway
    United Nations ECE/ENERGY/GE.3/2020/10 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 15 April 2020 Original: English only Economic Commission for Europe Committee on Sustainable Energy Expert Group on Resource Management Eleventh session Geneva, 20-24 April 2020 Item 11 of the provisional agenda Application of the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC) in different geographical contexts. United Nations Framework Classification for Resources Case Studies from Finland/Estland, Sweden and Norway – Nordkalk limestone and Forsand sand and gravel mines Prepared by the Geological Survey of Norway, the Geological Survey of Sweden, Nordkalk, Forsand Sandkompani and Petronavit a.s. Summary This study demonstrates how the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC) is being used to classify industrial mineral extraction projects for limestone in Estland and Sweden, and for a gravel and sand project in Norway. The report summarizes the main features of UNFC before describing the Nordkalk limestone projects. These projects demonstrate the usefulness of UNFC in categorizing environmental, social economic conditions and technical feasibility that may facilitate or hamper project development. The gravel and sand project demonstrates the use of UNFC in a case with few complications. This also shows an accounting method based on a standard that is common in national statistics as well as in project management. The gravel and sand case is also used to show how a UNFC inventory built with respect for the quality requirements embedded in the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) may be translated into a CRIRSCO inventory. This allows for new UNFC accounts to be compared with existing CRIRSCO accounts and thus prevents a break in the records when going from a CRIRSCO standard to the UNFC standard ECE/ENERGY/GE.3/2020/10 Contents Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • HØLE Berggrunnskart
    " " " " " " " * " " * " * # " " " # " " " # " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " * " " # " " " " " # # * " 3 3 " 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 * 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 340 " " # " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 17 5 5 " " " " " " " " " 12 Troppeknuten * LØSMASSER FRA KVARTÆRTIDEN # " 44 " # " " Jøssang " " " # " " # " " " " " 18 # 1 " # 43 " 5 " " " 18 17 # # DEPOSITS OF QUATERNARY AGE " " " " 5 " " " Svines "" " " " " " " " # # # " " " " # " " " " # Berggrunnskart " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Løsmasser, udifferensiert # " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " # " " " " " " " " " " 0 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " * " " " " " " " " " " " " 8" 260 Lammatoknuten Superficial deposits, undifferentiated " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " * " " " Rindane 2 " * " 11 6 " " " × " 53 " " " " " " # 5 Ådnanesnuten 3 Tangane " × " " Bedrock map " " " " Vatne # " " " " " 20 " " " " " " " " " " 17 " * " " " " 1 " " " " 64 " " " 15 " # " " # " " " " " " " " " # 24 " " " " " # " " " " " " " 4 10 " " " " " " " 43 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " * Husafjellet BERGARTER FREMSKJØVET UNDER DEN KALEDONSKE " " 17 # " " " " " " " 1 184 " " " " 42 " " " " Idse " 76 Dormåls- 5 " " 17 " " " " " * R " " " " " 8 " " # " Idsal 170 " " " Kalvberg " " " " e " FJELLKJEDEDANNELSEN # " # # " v * " " " 14 " " " " 706 " " " " " # s * " " " " " * " Storvarde " " 10 " n " " # #"
    [Show full text]
  • Historiske Byrom Historiske Møteplasser I Sandnes
    Torgdag på Gamlatorget, trolig i tidlig etterkrigstid. Foto Kolbjørn Rostrup. HISTORISKE BYROM HISTORISKE MØTEPLASSER I SANDNES Dokumentet er utarbeidet som: ➢ kunnskapsgrunnlag i plan og byggesaksprosesser. ➢ kunnskapsgrunnlag for de som ønsker å bli kjent med historien og lokal identitet gjennom fysiske spor ➢ supplement til registreringene i Kulturminneregisteret Arbeidet med å samkjøre kulturminnene i Forsand og Sandnes er påbegynt, og rapportene vil senere bli komplettert. Automatisk fredete kulturminner er ikke omtalt her. For informasjon om disse se Riksantikvarens database Askeladden. 0 Byantikvaren i Sandnes. Rev. 20.08.2020 INNHOLD Historiske byrom Innledning .............................................. 1 Typer historiske byrom .......................... 1 Historiske møteplasser i Sandnes Historiske byrom enkeltvis ..................... 9 Byens møterom ................................ 9 Neset/Kaien ...................................... 9 Moulandbrygga .............................. 10 Krossen .......................................... 10 Sandnes’ første jernbanestj ........... 11 Gamlatorget ................................... 11 Ruten – det nye torget ................... 18 Storkommunens nye rådhus .......... 19 Skeiane .......................................... 19 Parkene .......................................... 21 Jernbaneparken 21 Kirkeparken .................................... 21 Sykehusparken .............................. 22 Gandsparkene................................ 22 Jonas Øglænds plass ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Nasjonal Turistveg Ryfylke
    NATUR TURISTVEGER Nasjonal Turistveg Ryfylke Hardanger/Odda/Bergen Odda Nasjonal turistveg Hardanger Hardangervidda Oslo/ Røldal Telemark Kyrkjenuten E 134 29 1602 Rv.13 nd Røldal ala rd nd o ala H g Øvre Sandvatn o Røldalsvatnet Attractions in Ryfylke R E 134 n e ar d k 1. Kjerag r es o Reinaskar- j fj k Breifonn a Indrejord Røldalsvegen Ek 2. Preikestolen kr nuten Å Buer 1241 3. Flørli Power station Slettedalsvatnet Skånevik Breiborg and steps - 4444 SAUDA Fv. 520 Rv.13 Melsnuten 4. Landa, prehistoric village Nordstøldalen (closed in winter) 1573 5. Månafossen fallsUtbjoa Hellandsbygd 6. Jørpelandsholmen islet & Nesflaten Etne Sauda Scenic Route Ryfylke Roaldkvam The Norwegian Stonehenge 27 23 Saudasjøen Storelva Fitjarnuten 28 Skaulen 1504 7. Rock carvings at Solbakk 1538 E 134 Svandals- Gjuvastøl Kvernheia fossen 26 n 8. Flor & Fjære e 1182 d r Roaldsnuten o j j j j 1155 f f f 9. Villa Tou/Mølleparken Svandalenl f Dyrskarnuten 22 a a a 25 a d d d Hor d Maldal 1296 u u u 10. Årdal old church da u Ølen land a Bråtveit Rog S 11. The Fairytale Forest aland Suldalsvegen 12. Vigatunet farm 24 Suldalsvatnet Jonstøl 13. Hauske old arched stone bridge Scenic Route Ryfylke Sandeid VINDAFJORD Fv. 520 Vanvik 21 Snønuten 14. The Spinnery 1604 Scenic Route Ryfylke Kolbeinstveit 15. Ritland Crater Hylsfjorden Vinjarnuten Rv. 46 1105 S MAP: ELLEN JEPSON MAP: a 16. Jelsa church and village n SULDAL d Såta e id Suldalsosen 1423 17. Ostasteidn (view point) f jo Vikedal Ropeid r n 18. Blåsjø d 20 Sand låge e 19 ldals n Su DYRAHEIO 19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agrarian Life of the North 2000 Bc–Ad 1000 Studies in Rural Settlement and Farming in Norway
    The Agrarian Life of the North 2000 bc–ad 1000 Studies in Rural Settlement and Farming in Norway Frode Iversen & Håkan Petersson Eds. THE AGRARIAN LIFE OF THE NORTH 2000 BC –AD 1000 Studies in rural settlement and farming in Norway Frode Iversen & Håkan Petersson (Eds.) © Frode Iversen and Håkan Petersson, 2017 ISBN: 978-82-8314-099-6 This work is protected under the provisions of the Norwegian Copyright Act (Act No. 2 of May 12, 1961, relating to Copyright in Literary, Scientific and Artistic Works) and published Open Access under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license allows third parties to freely copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as well as remix, transform or build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, provided the work is properly attributed to the author(s), including a link to the license, and any changes that may have been made are thoroughly indicated. The attribution can be provided in any reasonable manner, however, in no way that suggests the author(s) or the publisher endorses the third party or the third party’s use of the work. Third parties are prohibited from applying legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted under the terms of the license. Note that the license may not provide all of the permissions necessary for an intended reuse; other rights, for example publicity, privacy, or moral rights, may limit third party use of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Here Is Surprisingly Easy! Ferry Schedule Summary Schedules 2020
    Getting here is surprisingly easy! 2 ferries, 4 daily departures + daytrips with local tour operators Flørli is only accessible by ferry, with your own boat or by hiking across the mountains. There are two ferries, four daily calls. You can bring your car on the ferry or leave it on the quay in Lauvvik, Forsand, Songesand or Lysebotn. If you bring your car, you can park it on the quay in Flørli, but there’s no parking at the accommodation itself. Groups can charter a boat, see under www.florli.no/Events. Ferry schedule summary TheFjords (MF Kvinnherad, a large ferry with sightseeing, takes 40 cars) To read schedule: http://thefjords.no/files/documents/fjord-cruise-lysefjord-2020.pdf To book online: www.thefjords.no or call +47 57 63 14 00 Passengers buy tickets on board, but we recommend to reserve for car. Season: 28th may – 12th september 2020 Kolumbus (MS Lysefjord, a fast ferry, takes 10 cars) To read schedule: www.kolumbus.no/globalassets/ruter/baatruter/stavanger-lysebotn-kombibat.pdf To book online: https://bestilling.kolumbus.no Passengers can buy tickets on board, but we recommend both passengers and drivers to reserve a place. Season: all year, not Saturdays and Sunday morning. Schedules 2020 With Kolumbus With TheFjords To Flørli from Lauvvik 06:05 / 13:55 / (16:45 fr/su) 09:30 / 15:00 From Flørli to Lauvvik 07:35 / 15:45 / (18:00 fr/su) 13:10 / 18:40 To Flørli from Lysebotn 07:20 / 15:30 / (17:45 fr/su) 12:30 / 18:00 From Flørli to Lysebotn 06:45 / 14:45 / (17:30 fr/su) 10:50 / 16:45 not on saturdays and sunday morning all days Airport to Stavanger or Sandnes The Stavanger Airport Sola lies in between the two cities of Stavanger and Sandnes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Rutebåt Til Lysefjorden
    Rutebåt til Lysefjorden 2021 Fra Lauvvik til Lysefjorden Fra Lysefjorden til Lauvvik Mandag til fredag Mandag til fredag Rutenr. Operatør Lauvvik Forsand Bratteli Bakken SongesandKalleli Flørli Håheller Lysebotn Rutenr. Operatør Lysebotn Håheller Flørli Kalleli SongesandBakken Bratteli Forsand Lauvvik 560 Norled 0555 0600 0620b 0622b 0625b 0630b 0635b 0655b 0705 560 Norled 0710 0720b 0725b 0728b 0732b 0739b 0741b 0830 0840 560 Norled 1355 1400 1420b 1422b 1430b 1440b 1445b 1515b 1525 560 Norled 1530 1540b 1545b 1548b 1555b 1559b 1601b 1630 1635 Kun fredag Kun fredag Rutenr. Operatør Lauvvik Forsand Bratteli Bakken SongesandKalleli Flørli Håheller Lysebotn Rutenr. Operatør Lysebotn Håheller Flørli Kalleli SongesandBakken Bratteli Forsand Lauvvik 560 Norled 1650 1655 1705b 1710b 1715b 1725b 1730b 1735b 1740 560 Norled 1815b 1825b 1830b 1833b 1840b 1844b 1846b 1915b 1920 Ingen avganger på lørdager Ingen avganger på lørdager Søndag Søndag Rutenr. Operatør Lauvvik Forsand Bratteli Bakken SongesandKalleli Flørli Håheller Lysebotn Rutenr. Operatør Lysebotn Håheller Flørli Kalleli SongesandBakken Bratteli Forsand Lauvvik 560 Norled 1355 1400 1420b 1422b 1430b 1440b 1445b 1515b 1525 560 Norled 1530 1540b 1545b 1548b 1555b 1559b 1601b 1630 1635 560 Norled 1650 1655 1705b 1710b 1715b 1725b 1730b 1735b 1740 560 Norled 1815b 1825b 1830b 1833b 1840b 1844b 1846b 1915b 1920 Transportbåt til Ådnøy Rutenr. Operatør Dager Forsand Lauvvik Ådnøy Ådnøy Lauvvik Forsand 560 Norled Man, ons, fre 1310b 1315b 1330b 1330b 1355b 1400b 560 Norled Tir --- 0840b 0845b 0845b 0850b --- Fotnoter Footnotes Gyldig fra 6. april 2021 b Anløpstid er ca.tid og kaien anløpes kun dersom det er passasjerer / gods til eller fra stedet.Ruten b The arrival times are approximate and the ferry calls only when there are trafikeres av MS Lysefjord som er en kombinert lastekatamaran med begrenset kapasitet.Lauvvik passengers or goods to or from the place in question.
    [Show full text]
  • A 10Be Chronology of Southwestern Scandinavian Ice Sheet History
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE (2014) 29(4) 370–380 ISSN 0267-8179. DOI: 10.1002/jqs.2710 A 10Be chronology of south-western Scandinavian Ice Sheet history during the Lateglacial period JASON P. BRINER,1* JOHN INGE SVENDSEN,2 JAN MANGERUD,2 ØYSTEIN S. LOHNE2 and NICOLA´ S E. YOUNG3 1Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA 2Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway 3Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA Received 22 December 2013; Revised 12 March 2014; Accepted 29 March 2014 ABSTRACT: We present 34 new cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages that constrain the Lateglacial (Bølling–Preboreal) history of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet in the Lysefjorden region, south-western Norway. We find that the classical Lysefjorden moraines, earlier thought to be entirely of Younger Dryas age, encompass three adjacent moraines attributed to at least two ice sheet advances of distinctly different ages. The 10Be age of the outermost moraine (14.0 Æ 0.6 ka; n ¼ 4) suggests that the first advance is of Older Dryas age. The innermost moraine is at least 2000 years younger and was deposited near the end of the Younger Dryas (11.4 Æ 0.4 ka; n ¼ 7). After abandonment of the innermost Lysefjorden Moraine, the ice front receded quickly towards the head of the fjord, where recession was interrupted by an advance that deposited the Trollgaren Moraine at 11.3 Æ 0.9 ka (n ¼ 5). 10Be ages from the inboard side of the Trollgaren Moraine suggest final retreat by 10.7 Æ 0.3 ka (n ¼ 7).
    [Show full text]
  • The Stavanger Region
    WELCOME ON BOARD Rødne Fjord Cruise and the crew welcome you on board! The trip will take us far into the country and show us idyllic island scenery as well as a wild and beautiful West Norwegian nature. In order to be prepared in case of an emergency, we ask you to please read the safety information on board. A STAVANGER Stavanger is today the fourth largest city in Norway with approximately 120.000 inhabitants. Stavanger is considered to be the oil capital of Norway, but before oil was discovered in the North Sea it was fish, specifically sardines that kept the city going. B TINGHOLMEN/HØGSFJORD After passing the historically interesting Tingholmen, where King Olav Tryggvason held his national assembly in 998, we proceed into the Høgsfjord. Many Stavanger families have their summerhouses along the coastline here. C LYSEFJORD The Lysefjord is 42 km long. The name dates back to the old Norse name Lýsir or light. It is believed this refers to the lightly colored granite that can be found in the fjord. The Lysefjord was formed by glaciers during the ice ages. During the most recent ice age, about 10.000 years ago, Norway was covered with a layer ofice that was up to 2.000 meters thick. The fjord is a deep ravine between mountainous valley sides. Between Oanes and Forsand, there is an end moraine of sand, and the fjord is only 10-20 meters deep at this point. Ever since man first settled in the area, fishing and hunting have been important activities here.
    [Show full text]
  • Deformabilita' Dei Ponti Di Grande Luce Soggetti All'azione Di Carichi Viaggianti
    Università degli Studi della Calabria Dottorato di Ricerca in Ingegneria dei Materiali e delle Strutture XIX ciclo Settore disciplinare ICAR/08 DEFORMABILITA’ DEI PONTI DI GRANDE LUCE SOGGETTI ALL’AZIONE DI CARICHI VIAGGIANTI Tesi presentata per il conseguimento del titolo di Dottore di Ricerca in Ingegneria dei Materiali e delle Strutture da Daniele V. Cavallaro Coordinatore del Corso di Dottorato Tutor del Candidato Prof. Domenico Bruno Prof. Domenico Bruno Dipartimento di Strutture Novembre 2006 ii A Nicoletta iii iv Indice Sommario .........................................................................xv 1 Introduzione.................................................................1 1.1 Stato dell’arte................................................................................... 2 1.2 Stato attuale della ricerca................................................................. 7 1.3 Obiettivi della tesi...........................................................................11 2 Il carico mobile ..........................................................13 2.1 Premessa .........................................................................................13 2.2 Sistema continuo .............................................................................17 2.2.1 Trave percorsa da una forza concentrata ...................................17 2.2.1.1. Massa del carico trascurabile rispetto a quella della trave...................... 17 2.2.1.2. Massa della trave trascurabile rispetto a quella del carico.....................
    [Show full text]