Fishing in Washington Seasons and Rules Pamphlet, Please See

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishing in Washington Seasons and Rules Pamphlet, Please See For the latest corrections and clarifications to the 2006-2007 Fishing in Washington Seasons and Rules pamphlet, please see: http://wdfw.wa.gov/do/newreal/release.php?id=may1506a SPORT FISHING RULES 2006/2007 pamphlet edition FISHING IN WASHINGTON Effective from May 1, 2006, to April 30, 2007, both dates inclusive. Paid Advertisement Boaters are equipped with floatcoats n o i t a CContentsontents m r o Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife GENERAL RULES & INFORMATION f n I How to use this pamphlet .......................14 Jeff Koenings, Ph.D., Director l New for 2006 ..........................................11 a r Lew Atkins, Assistant Director, Fish Program Statewide General Rules .......................25 e n License Information ...........................18-19 e Sport Catch Record Cards .....................20 Information G General Fish Program Statewide Customer Service Catch Record Card Codes .....................21 Defi nitions ..........................................22-24 (360) 902-2700 (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Mon.-Fri.) s Careful Handling of Fish .........................16 e l u For fi shing regulation questions, e-mail: fi [email protected] R FRESHWATER GENERAL RULES r For all other questions or comments, e-mail: fi [email protected] e Statewide Freshwater Rules .............27-29 t Internet Address: http://wdfw.wa.gov/ Bull Trout/Dolly Varden & Eastern a w Brook Trout ID ........................................26 h s Selected Game Fish ID Pictures .......31-32 e Main Offi ce Phone Numbers Street Address Mailing Address r Olympia (360) 902-2700 Natural Resources Building 600 Capitol Way N Rules F Freshwater TDD (800) 833-6388 1111 Washington St. SE Olympia WA WESTSIDE FRESHWATER Olympia WA 98504 98501-1091 Westside Rivers - Special Rules .......33-57 r Westside Lakes - Special Rules ........58-66 e t Regional Offi ces (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Mon.-Fri.) Unlisted Westside Lakes Access Areas .67 a w h Spokane (509) 892-1001 2315 N Discovery Pl. Spokane Valley, WA 99216-1566 EASTSIDE FRESHWATER s e Ephrata (509) 754-4624 1550 Alder St. NW, Ephrata, WA 98823-9699 r Eastside Rivers - Special Rules .......68-81 F Yakima (509) 575-2740 1701 S 24th Ave., Yakima, WA 98902-5720 Eastside Lakes - Special Rules .........82-91 e d Mill Creek (425) 775-1311 16018 Mill Creek Blvd., Mill Creek, WA 98012-1541 Unlisted Eastside Lakes Access Areas ..92 i s Vancouver* (360) 696-6211 2108 Grand Blvd., Vancouver, WA 98661-4624 t s Montesano* (360) 249-4628 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, WA 98563-9618 MARINE AREAS e Statewide Marine Area Rules .................94 Freshwater W Westside *These offi ces operate 24-hour local recreational information lines which can be Marine Area Defi nitions and Codes ........95 Marine Area Rules & Maps ..............99-121 r accessed by calling the listed telephone numbers and listening to the instructions. e Salmon ID Pictures .................................96 t a Atlantic, Coho & Chinook ID Pictures .....97 w Hotline Numbers h Wild/Hatchery ID.....................................97 s e WDFW Fishing Hotline: (360) 902-2500 Marine Fish ID Pictures ..........................98 r F Shellfi sh Rule Change Hotline: (866) 880-5431 e d SHELLFISH/SEAWEED RULES i s Statewide Shellfi sh/Seaweed Rules ....122 t To check on Fish Consumption Advisories: (877) 485-7316 s Public Beach List - Special Rules ..124-125 a To check on Shellfi sh Advisories (Marine Toxins/PSP): (800) 562-5632 Shellfi sh ID Pictures ......................126-127 E Eastside Freshwater or www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/sf/biotoxin.htm Shellfi sh/Seaweed Species Rules .128-132 To report poaching: (800) 477-6224 Shellfi sh Gear Rules .............................133 To report derelict fi shing gear: (800) 477-6224 s To report fi sh kills, or oil or hazardous material spills contact: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADVISORIES a e Department of Emergency Management: (800) 258-5990 Fish Consumption Advisory ....................30 r A Beaches with Health Restrictions .........123 WDFW Licensing: (360) 902-2464 WDFW Habitat: (360) 902-2534 e n i WDFW Wildlife: (360) 902-2515 WDFW Enforcement: (360) 902-2936 r a Fishing & Shellfishing Rules in State and National Parks, Federal Lands, Indian Reservations and Canada M Marine Areas Contact Olympic National Park at (360) 452-4501, Gifford Pinchot National Forest at (360) 891-5009 or www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/, Mt. Rainier National Park at (360) 569-2211, or North Cascades National Park at (360) 856-5700 for rules and other information that apply within the parks (State Parks (360) 902-8500). d State licenses and rules apply on National Forest lands. e e Before fi shing on Indian reservations, contact the tribe for the necessary permits and rules. Quinault Indian Nation (360) 276-8211; w Colville Confederated Tribes (509) 634-4711; Puyullap Tribe of Indians (253) 845-9225; Yakama Nation (509) 865-5121; a Lummi Tribe (360) 384-1489; Swinomish Tribal Community (360) 466-7228; Makah Tribe (360) 645-2201; Kalispell Tribe (509) 445-1147. e S / An access permit is required to fi sh waters on the Fort Lewis Military Reservation. Call: (253) 967-6263 or (253) 967-5414. h s McChord Air Force Base fi shing information (253) 982-3913 i f l General inquiries about Canadian fi shing regulations and licensing, phone (604) 666-0384 or FAX (604) 666-1847. l e h S Shellfish/Seaweed This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact (360) 902-2200 or TDD (800) 833-6388. This pamphlet is also available online at https://fortress.wa.gov/dfw/erules/efi shrules/index.jsp 9 A Message from the Director and Commission Chair Tie those fl ies and shine those fl ashers, With tribal co-managers and constituent Not only do anglers help the state’s it’s time to get out and enjoy another groups, we’re also implementing a bottom line, so do wildlife watchers. At fi shing season in Washington. science-based plan for improving our nearly $1 billion a year, Washington ranks hatchery system – the largest in the world seventh in the nation in spending by Anglers once again have a wide range and the backbone of our fi shing industry. wildlife viewers. West of the Mississippi of fi shing opportunities this year. From The goal of hatchery reform is to operate River, only the vast states of Texas fl y-fi shing for bass and trout on Eastern each individual hatchery in a way that and California outrank our state—the Washington freshwater lakes and sustains wild salmon populations and smallest of the western states—in streams to trolling for salmon along ensures fi shing opportunities for future spending by wildlife watchers. We expect the coast and in Puget Sound, our generations. that ecotourism will continue to grow in state offers anglers diverse and unique popularity. experiences. While wild fi sh and anglers benefi t from these efforts, so does the state. Fish-and It’s clear, healthy fi sh and wildlife Jeff Koenings, Ph.D, Shellfi sh harvesters also have an wildlife-related activities contribute more populations improve our quality of life Director, assortment of opportunities this season. than $2 billion a year to Washington’s and help boost Washington’s economy. Dungeness crab, shrimp, clams and economy. And our goal is to ensure that future Washington Department oysters are all available throughout generations can continue to enjoy of Fish and Wildlife Puget Sound, while razor clams provide Sport anglers alone spent $854 million Washington’s vast fi sh and wildlife a fantastic digging opportunity along the pursuing fi shing opportunities in our resources. coast. state’s waters, placing Washington in the top 10 nationally in total spending These resources are available because by anglers, according to a recent U.S. of scientifi cally sound fi sh management. Fish and Wildlife survey. Razor clam Safeguards, such as selective salmon digs infuse nearly $5 million a year into fi shing, protect fi sh populations listed our coastal communities, while the sales Washington Fish & Wildlife under the federal Endangered Species of recreational boats and accessories Commission Act, while still allowing anglers to catch generate $454 million. healthy stocks of hatchery and naturally (360) 902-2267 spawning fi sh. We provide this array of fi shing opportunities with a modest state Ron Ozment, Chair, Cathlamet To strengthen listed salmon and fi nancial investment. Each dollar of state Fred Shiosaki, Vice Chair, Spokane steelhead stocks, we continue to focus General Fund money that comes to our on recovery efforts. We are working with Dr. Kenneth Chew, Seattle agency generates $53 in direct economic Jerry Gutzwiler, Wenatchee Ron Ozment, tribal co-managers, federal agencies, and benefi ts, and creates a $101 ripple-effect Dr. Conrad Mahnken, Bainbridge Island Chair, the public to continue our efforts to craft throughout the state’s economy. conservation-based fi sheries plans that Charles Perry, Moses Lake Washington Fish and meet recovery goals and avoid harming Anglers, charter boat operators, gas Will Roehl, Bellingham Wildlife Commission protected wild stocks. You, the fi shing stations, motels, restaurants and Shirley Solomon, Mount Vernon public, play a strategic role in these sporting good stores all prosper from Miranda Wecker, Naselle efforts by providing timely and accurate Washington’s recreational fi sheries. catch data. Conservation has been and will continue to be our bottom line. A Message from the Assistant Director and the Deputy Assistant Director Fishing Friends, “Get hooked on Fishing” in the to list Puget Sound Steelhead as necessary to implement this science. So, get out and enjoy the diversity of beautiful State of Washington. “Threatened” under the Endangered Although it may be tough to fi nd the fi shing opportunities throughout our Opportunities abound across the Species Act (ESA), then broaden funding in our existing budgets, we beautiful state. We look forward to state to provide you, your family, and the plan over time to include feel it is well worth the sacrifi ce and the future and working with all of you friends with all sorts of fi n fi sh and other species.
Recommended publications
  • WHITE PASS SCENIC BYWAY Pocket Guide To
    Pocket Guide to the WHITE PASS SCENIC BYWAY Take an unforgettable journey through the scenic heart of Washington State’s Volcano Country To Tacoma To Puyallup Crystal enic By Mountain inook Sc way A Welcome to the Sunrise Ch (closed ll- North in w Am in e te ri MOUNT RAINIER r ca ) n R o Eatonville a White Pass NATIONAL PARK d 410 ) r e t n Mount Rainier i w 123 d e National Scenic s o Paradise l c ( Elbe Ashford ( 706 Byway! Ohanapecosh Oak Creek S k Wildlife Area at e C re ( ek clo sed R in o To Olympia, Tacoma and Seattle w a in d te Centralia 7 r) Rimrock Naches Chehalis Retreat To Yakima Morton Randle White To the Exit 68 Ethel Salkum Pass Pacic Coast 12 Packwood Mossyrock Glenoma Exit 63 25 23 21 Exit 60 MOUNT ST. HELENS Exit 57 505 NATIONAL VOLCANIC 5 504 MONUMENT Toutle 99 Exit 49 25 23 Johnston Ridge Observatory Windy Ridge Viewing Area Mount Adams To Portland Mount St. Helens To Stevenson To White Salmon Make the most of yur trip along the White Pass Scenic Byway with this helpful Pocket Guide. Find scenic viewpoints and recreational opportunities as well as services and information centers. To Tacoma To Puyallup Crystal nic By Mountain nook Sce way A Sunrise Chi (close ll- North d in w Am in e te ri MOUNT RAINIER r ca ) n R o a Eatonville NATIONAL PARK d 410 ) r e t n Mount Rainier i w 123 d e s o Paradise l c Elbe Ashford ( 706 Ohanapecosh Oak Creek S k Wildlife Area at e C re ( ek clo sed R in o To Olympia, Tacoma and Seattle w a in d te Centralia 7 r) Rimrock Naches Chehalis Retreat To Yakima Morton Randle White To the Exit 68 Ethel Salkum Pass Pacic Coast 12 Packwood Mossyrock Glenoma Exit 63 25 23 21 Exit 60 The byway travels between three of MOUNT ST.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographical Profiles of Shorebird Migration in Midcontinental North America
    U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Technical Report Series Information and Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Technology Reports ISSN 1081-2911 Papers published in this series record the significant find­ These reports are intended for the publication of book­ ings resulting from USGS/BRD-sponsored and cospon­ length-monographs; synthesis documents; compilations sored research programs. They may include extensive data of conference and workshop papers; important planning or theoretical analyses. These papers are the in-house coun­ and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard terpart to peer-reviewed journal articles, but with less strin­ operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manu­ gent restrictions on length, tables, or raw data, for example. als; and data compilations such as tables and bibliogra­ We encourage authors to publish their fmdings in the most phies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review appropriate journal possible. However, the Biological Sci­ and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. ence Reports represent an outlet in which BRD authors may publish papers that are difficult to publish elsewhere due to the formatting and length restrictions of journals. At the same time, papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. To purchase this report, contact the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (call toll free 1-800-553-684 7), or the Defense Technical Infonnation Center, 8725 Kingman Rd., Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218. Biogeographical files o Shorebird Migration · Midcontinental Biological Science USGS/BRD/BSR--2000-0003 December 1 By Susan K.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Department
    City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities Power Division Cowlitz Falls North Shore Collector Downstream Fish Evaluation RFP Specification No. PG16-0558F QUESTIONS and ANSWERS All interested parties had the opportunity to submit questions in writing to Joe Parris, Purchasing Division by 3:00 PM on January 9, 2017. The answers to the questions received are provided below and posted to the City’s website at www.TacomaPurchasing.org. This information IS NOT considered an addendum. Respondents should consider this information when submitting their proposals. Question 1: In reference to page 1: Is the Downstream Fish Passage Conceptual Design Report available? Answer 1: Yes, the report was submitted to FERC on February 15, 2012 and will be provided with the responses. Question 2: In reference to page 6, item #10 - The Required Form only indicates Signature page be included: What is to be done with Appendix A Proposal Form and Contractor Record of Prior Contracts? Are these also to be included as RFP Content to be Submitted? Answer 2: Yes. Both forms are required in the content to be submitted. An Addendum will be posted to clarify these requirements Question 3: In reference to page 8 - objective 3b: Define FSC performance. Answer 3: The primary metric for measuring the CFNSC (rather than the FSC) is Fish Passage Survival (FPS). Target FPS is 95%, with a minimum of 75% while employing the best available technology. Secondary metrics include Fish Collection Efficiency (FCE), Detection Efficiency (DE), Entrance Efficiency (EE), and Retention Efficiency (RE). Question 4: In reference to page 8, Objective 4b: Is information on outmigration historical run timing available? Answer 4: Yes, although these data will be limited to periods when the collector has been operated, typically April 1st through August 31st.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan (FHMP) Draft Final
    Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan (FHMP) Draft Final Cowlitz Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2016 Tacoma Power 3628 S 35th Street Tacoma, WA 98409 October 2019 Cowlitz Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2016) Draft Final FHMP (October 2019) Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License ..................................... 1-5 1.1.1. Settlement Agreement ....................................................................................................... 1-5 1.1.2. Applicable License Articles ................................................................................................ 1-6 1.2 Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan (FHMP) ................................. 1-8 1.2.1. Purpose of the Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan ............................................. 1-10 1.3 Endangered Species Act Regulatory Framework ................................... 1-11 1.3.1. NOAA Fisheries Biological Opinion .................................................................................. 1-12 1.3.2. Cowlitz River Subbasin Plans .......................................................................................... 1-12 1.3.3. National Marine Fisheries Service Recovery Plan ........................................................... 1-13 1.3.4. Hatchery Genetics Management Plans (HGMPs) ........................................................... 1-14 1.3.5. Conservation and
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonate Deposition, Pyramid Lake Subbasin, Nevada: 2
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 1995 Carbonate deposition, Pyramid Lake subbasin, Nevada: 2. Lake levels and polar jet stream positions reconstructed from radiocarbon ages and elevations of carbonates (tufas) deposited in the Lahontan basin Larry Benson U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Michaele Kashgarian Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory Meyer Rubin U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Benson, Larry; Kashgarian, Michaele; and Rubin, Meyer, "Carbonate deposition, Pyramid Lake subbasin, Nevada: 2. Lake levels and polar jet stream positions reconstructed from radiocarbon ages and elevations of carbonates (tufas) deposited in the Lahontan basin" (1995). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 1014. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/1014 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PhJ.d @ ELSEVIER Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 117 (1995) 1-30 Carbonate deposition, Pyramid Lake subbasin, Nevada: 2. Lake levels and polar jet stream positions reconstructed from radiocarbon ages and elevations of carbonates (tufas) deposited in the Lahontan basin Larry Benson a, Michaele Kashgarian b, Meyer Rubin c a U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine St., Boulder, CO 80303, USA b Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Carson River Watershed Discovery Report 2018
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 2 General Information .................................................................................................... 1 3 Watershed Stakeholder Coordination ......................................................................... 5 4 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Data that can be used for Flood Risk Products ....................................................................... 8 4.1.1 Topographic Data ..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 USGS Gages .............................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Other Data and Information ................................................................................................ 10 4.2.1 Mitigation Plans/Status, Mitigation Projects ......................................................................................... 10 4.2.2 Coordinated Needs Mapping Study (CNMS) and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Mapping Study Needs ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 4.2.3 Socio‐Economic Analysis .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Truckee-Carson River Basin Study
    Truckee-Carson RiverBasinStudy FinalReport JeremyPratt ClearwaterConsulting Corporation Seattle,Washington ReporttotheWesternWater PolicyReviewAdvisoryCommission Truckee-Carson River Basin Study Final Report Jeremy Pratt Clearwater Consulting Corporation Seattle, Washington Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission September 1997 The Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission Under the Western Water Policy Review Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-575, Title XXX), Congress directed the President to undertake a comprehensive review of Federal activities in the 19 Western States that directly or indirectly affect the allocation and use of water resources, whether surface or subsurface, and to submit a report of findings to the congressional committees having jurisdiction over Federal Water Programs. As directed by the statute, the President appointed the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. The Commission was composed of 22 members, 10 appointed by the President, including the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army, and 12 members of Congress serving ex-officio by virtue of being the chair or ranking minority member of the 6 congressional committees and subcommittees with jurisdiction over the appropriations and programs of water resources agencies. A complete roster is provided below. Commission Membership Denise Fort, Chair Albuquerque, New Mexico Appointed Members: Huali Chai Patrick O'Toole Secretary of the Interior San Jose, California Savery, Wyoming Washington, D.C. Represented by: John H. Davidson Jack Robertson Joe Sax, September 1995 - December 1996 Vermillion, South Dakota Portland, Oregon Patricia J. Beneke, December 1996 - John Echohawk Kenneth L. Salazar Secretary of the Army Boulder, Colorado Denver, Colorado Washington, DC Represented by: Janet Neuman Dr. John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Paleohydrology of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink in the Western Great Basin, Nevada, USA
    Quaternary Research Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi:10.1017/qua.2018.151 Late Holocene paleohydrology of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink in the western Great Basin, Nevada, USA Kenneth D. Adamsa*, Edward J. Rhodesb aDivision of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, Nevada 89512, USA bDepartment of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom *Corresponding author e-mail address: [email protected] (RECEIVED June 8, 2018; ACCEPTED December 6, 2018) Abstract The late Holocene histories of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink were reconstructed by synthesizing existing data in both basins along with new age constraints from key sites, supplemented with paleohydrologic modeling. The repeated diversions of the Walker River to the Carson Sink and then back to Walker Lake caused Walker Lake–level fluctuations spanning ± 50 m. Low lake levels at about 1000, 750, and 300 cal yr BP are time correlative to the ages of fluvial deposits along the Walker River paleochannel, when flow was directed toward the Carson Sink. The timing and duration of large lakes in the Carson Sink were further refined using moisture-sensitive tree-ring chronologies. The largest lakes required a fourfold to fivefold increase in discharge spanning decades. Addition of Walker River flow to the Carson Sink by itself is inadequate to account for the required discharge. Instead, increases in the runoff coefficient and larger areas of the drainage basin contributing surface runoff may explain the enhanced discharge required to create these large lakes. Keywords: Carson Sink; Holocene; Lake Lahontan; Paleohydrologic modeling; Walker Lake INTRODUCTION of the Walker River, which periodically switched course from one terminal basin to the other (Russell, 1885; Benson and Paleohydrologic records from Great Basin pluvial lakes pro- Thompson, 1987a, 1987b; Benson et al., 1991; King, 1993, vide a rich source of information enhancing understanding of 1996; Adams, 2003, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Mcquivey, Retired, Nevada Department of Wildlife May 3, 2005
    SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS CARSON RIVER DRAINAGE From Bob McQuivey, Retired, Nevada Department of Wildlife May 3, 2005 INTRODUCTION - The following list of references represents all available environmental records for the Carson River drainage extracted from the following sources and submitted to Randy Pahl of the Division of Environmental Protection on May 3, 2005: 1. Extracts from the Carson River fisheries files as updated through 04/25/05. 2. Extracts from the Journals and diaries file as updated through 10/26/04. 3. Extracts from the file on dams, fish ladders and screens as updated through 04/25/05. 4. Extracts from the file on pollution as updated through 4/26/05. 5. Extracts from the file on wetlands as updated through 11/20/02. 6. Extracts from the file on rangelands as updated through 11/06/01. 7. Extracts from the file on fires as updated through 4/15/03. See Attachment A for Mr. McQuivey’s letter accompanying this information. 1844 Smith, James U. John C. Fremont's Expedition in Nevada, 1843-1844. Nevada Historical Society Papers, 1909- 1910; pages 106-152. January 18, 1844 - [Carson River] There were Indian lodges and fish-dams on the stream. There were no beaver cuttings on the river... 1848 Ricketts, Norma Baldwin – The Mormon Battalion U.S. Army of the West 1846-1848; Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah 1996. July 29, 1848 – Summit Camp, 2 miles. …They camped at the head of a level valley filled with thick brush and tree close together, with plenty of grass for the animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis County Lodging and Camping*
    Lewis County Lodging and Camping* Please note that Destination Packwood lists all Lewis County lodging options as a courtesy. These are not business members of Destination Packwood and are not endorsed by Destination Packwood in any way. Please research online reviews prior to booking your stay. Chehalis Chehalis Inn 122 Interstate Ave 360-740-5339 Holiday Inn Express 730 Liberty Place 360-740-1800 Best Western Plus Park Place Inn and Suites 201 Southwest Interstate Ave 360-748-4040 Relax Inn 550 SW Parkland Dr 360-748-8608 Oak RV 118 US Hwy 12 360-262-9991 Centralia King Oscar 1049 Eckerson Rd 360-736-1661 Americas Best Value Inn 1325 Lakeshore Dr 360-736-9344 Peppermill Empress Inn 1233 Alder St 360-330-9441 Ferryman’s Inn 1003 Eckerson Rd 360-330-2094 Great Wolf Lodge Grand Mound 20500 Old Highway 99 360-273-7718 McMenamins Olympic Club Hotel and Theater 112 N. Tower Ave 360-736-5164 Travelodge 702 Harrison Ave 360-330-9844 Motel 6 1310 Belmont Ave 360-330-2057 Peppertree West RV Park & Motel 1208 Alder St 360-736-1124 Glenoma Lodge at the Glen 8598 US Hwy 12 509-877-3651 Taidnapam Park 888-226-7688 Mineral Historic Mineral Lake Lodge 195 Mineral Hill Road 360-492-5253 Mineral Lake Resort 148 Mineral Hill Rd 360-492-5367 Morton Gust Backstrom Park 750 Main Ave 360-496-6844 Roy’s Motel and RV 161 N. 2nd St. 360-496-5000 Season’s Motel 200 Westlake Ave 360-496-6835 Mossyrock Lake Mayfield Resort and Marina 350 Hadaller Road 360-985-2357 Adytum 186 Skyview Drive 360-983-8008 Harmony Retreat at Mayfield Lake 206-619-6008 Ike Kinswa State
    [Show full text]
  • Carson Lake Geothermal Exploration Project Environmental Assessment
    Carson Lake Geothermal Exploration Project Environmental Assessment March 2008 LEAD AGENCIES U.S. Navy Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City Field Office COOPERATING AGENCY U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lahontan Basin Area Office Carson Lake Geothermal Exploration Project Environmental Assessment March 2008 LEAD AGENCIES U.S. Navy Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City Field Office COOPERATING AGENCY U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lahontan Basin Area Office TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction and Purpose and Need...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Land Use Plan Conformance Statement...................................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2: Proposed Action and Alternatives......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Location and Overview ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Alternatives
    [Show full text]