DOCSLIB.ORG

Benscliffe Hay, Newton Linford Preliminary Ecological Appraisal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benscliffe Hay, Newton Linford Preliminary Ecological Appraisal BENSCLIFFE HAY, NEWTON LINFORD PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL A Report to: Franklin Ellis Report No: RT-MME-127450-01 Date: April 2018 Triumph House, Birmingham Road, Allesley, Coventry CV5 9AZ Tel: 01676 525880 Fax: 01676 521400 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.middlemarch-environmental.com Benscliffe Hay, Newton Linford RT-MME-127450-01 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal REPORT VERIFICATION AND DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE This study has been undertaken in accordance with British Standard 42020:2013 “Biodiversity, Code of practice for planning and development”. Report Date Completed by: Checked by: Approved by: Version Amy Finnegan MSc Grad CIEEM (Ecological Tom Docker MSc Dr Philip Fermor Consultant) and Sarah MCIEEM (Ecological Final 11/04/2018 MICEEM CEnv Boulstridge BSc (Hons) Impact Assessment (Managing Director) Grad CIEEM (Principal Manager) Consultant) The information which we have prepared is true, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that the opinions expressed are our true and professional bona fide opinions. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report are the responsibility of Middlemarch Environmental Ltd. It should be noted that, whilst every effort is made to meet the client’s brief, no site investigation can ensure complete assessment or prediction of the natural environment. Middlemarch Environmental Ltd accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. VALIDITY OF DATA The findings of this study are valid for a period of 24 months from the date of survey. If works have not commenced by this date, an updated site visit should be carried out by a suitably qualified ecologist to assess any changes in the habitats present on site, and to inform a review of the conclusions and recommendations made. Middlemarch Environmental Ltd. Page 1 Benscliffe Hay, Newton Linford RT-MME-127450-01 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Middlemarch Environmental Ltd was commissioned by Franklin Ellis to carry out a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal at the site of a proposed development at Benscliffe Hay in Newton Linford. To fulfil this brief an ecological desk study and a walkover survey (in accordance with Phase 1 Habitat Survey methodology) were undertaken. The desk study exercise identified no European statutory sites within 5 km of the survey area, five UK statutory sites within 2 km and 17 non-statutory sites within 1 km. The site is not located within 10 km of a statutory site designated for bats. The desk study also provided records of protected and notable species including bats, badger, brown hare, reptiles, amphibians, birds, invertebrates and plants. The walkover survey was undertaken on 20th March 2018 by Amy Finnegan, Ecological Consultant. The eastern portion of the site comprises a residential detached property surrounded by hardstanding and ornamental gardens comprising amenity lawns, scattered trees, introduced shrub and a pond. An access road is present leading from Benscliffe Road. The western portion of the site is dominated by grazed poor semi-improved grassland fields. Other habitats on site include hedgerows tall ruderal vegetation and ditches. The key ecological features on site/in the locality are adjacent nature conservation sites, the presence of notable habitats (pond, hedgerow, early-mature and mature trees) and the suitability of the habitats on site to support notable and/or protected species, including roosting/foraging bats, herpetofauna, nesting birds and terrestrial mammals. In order to ensure compliance with wildlife legislation and relevant planning policy, the following recommendations are made (full recommendations are made in Section 7): R1 LWS / pLWS: The proposed works could potentially indirectly impact upon Blakeshay Wood which is designated as a Local Wildlife Site and Newton Linford Rough Hill Wildlife Area which is designated as a Potential Local Wildlife Site. Therefore, a Construction Ecological Management Plan (CEcMP) should be compiled for the site. R2 Habitat Loss and Enhancement: Biodiversity enhancement measures should be incorporated into the landscaping scheme of any proposed works to maximise the ecological value of the site. R3 Protect Standing Water/Ditches: The proposals should be designed to allow for the retention of the pond and ditches on site. Environment Agency Pollution Prevention Guidelines should be adhered to throughout the works. R4 Trees/Hedgerows: The development should be designed to allow for the retention of early- mature/mature trees and hedgerow. Any trees or hedgerows on site, or overhanging the site, which are to be retained as a part of any proposed works should be protected in accordance with British Standard 5837: 2012 "Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction - recommendations". R5 Roosting Bats: If any buildings, or trees identified with bat potential (Target Note 3), are to be impacted by the development then a preliminary bat roost assessment/ground level bat roost assessment should be undertaken. R6 Foraging/Commuting Bats: The lighting strategy for the proposed development should be designed to minimise light spill onto retained site boundary features that are likely to be used by foraging and commuting bats, in particular any hedgerows/adjacent wood. R7 Herpetofauna: It is considered that the adverse impacts on the favourable conservation status of great crested newt and reptiles (if present) can be avoided through the implementation of reasonable avoidance measures. It is recommended that a method statement is compiled, detailing how the proposed works will be undertaken in a sensitive manner to avoid any potential breach of legislation. R9 Nesting Birds: Vegetation and building clearance should be undertaken outside the nesting bird season. The nesting bird season is weather dependent but generally extends between March and September inclusive (peak period March-August). R10 Terrestrial Mammals including Badger, Hedgehog and Brown Hare: Any excavations that need to be left overnight should be covered or fitted with mammal ramps to ensure that any animals that enter can safely escape. R11 Rhododendron: The rhododendron should either remain in situ, or if removed, a Method Statement should be developed to ensure that the proposed works do not result in the spread of any invasive non-native species. Middlemarch Environmental Ltd. Page 2 Benscliffe Hay, Newton Linford RT-MME-127450-01 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED .................................................................................................................. 4 2. METHODOLOGIES.................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 DESK STUDY ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY ..................................................................................................................... 5 3. LEGISLATION AND POLICY .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 GENERAL BIODIVERSITY LEGISLATION AND POLICY ................................................................................. 6 3.2 NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE GUIDANCE ..................................................... 7 3.3 LOCAL PLANNING POLICY- CHARNWOOD ................................................................................................ 8 4. DESK STUDY RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 10 4.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 NATURE CONSERVATION SITES ............................................................................................................ 10 4.3 PROTECTED / NOTABLE SPECIES .......................................................................................................... 12 4.4 INVASIVE SPECIES ................................................................................................................................ 14 5. PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY ................................................................................................................. 15 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 15 5.2 SURVEY CONSTRAINTS AND LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................. 15 5.3 HABITATS ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008
    Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008 Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008 Contents Title Page Executive summary 2-6 The Purpose of this Village Design Statement 7 1. Introduction 8 The purpose and use of this document. Aims and objectives 2. The Village Context 9-10 Geographical and historical background The village today and its people Economics and future development 3. The Landscape Setting Visual character of the surrounding countryside 11-12 Relationship between the surrounding countryside and the village periphery Landscape features Buildings in the landscape 4. Settlement Pattern and character 13-15 Overall pattern of the village Character of the streets and roads through the village Character and pattern of open spaces 5. Buildings & Materials in the Village 16-26 1. The challenge of good design 2. Harmony, the street scene 3. Proportions 4. Materials 5. Craftsmanship 6. Boundaries 7. Local Businesses 8. Building guidelines 6. Highways and Traffic 27-29 Characteristics of the roads and Footpaths Street furniture, utilities and services 7. Wildlife and Biodiversity 30-32 8. Acknowledgments 33 9. Appendix 1 Map of Village Conservation Area 34 Listed Buildings in the Village 35 10. Appendix 2 Map of the SSSI & Local Wildlife Sites 36 Key to the SSSI & Local Wildlife Sites 37-38 “Newtown Linford is a charming place with thatched and timbered dwellings, an inviting inn and a much restored medieval church in a peaceful setting by the stream - nor is this all, for the village is the doorstep to Bradgate Park, one of Leicestershire’s loveliest pleasure grounds,... … … with the ruins of the home of the ill fated nine days queen Lady Jane Grey” Arthur Mee - “Leicestershire” - Hodder and Stoughton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rove Beetles of Leicestershire and Rutland
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY The Rove Beetles (Staphylinidae) of Leicestershire and Rutland Part 1: Sub-families Paederinae, Pseudopsinae and Staphylininae Derek A. Lott Creophilus maxillosus (Graham Calow) LESOPS 24 (2011) ISSN 0957 – 1019 Correspondence: 5 Welland Road, Barrow upon Soar, LE12 8NA VC55 Staphylinids Part 1 2 Introduction With over 56,000 described species in the world, the Staphylinidae are the largest family in the animal kingdom (Grebennikov & Newton, 2009). Around a quarter of the British beetles are rove beetles, so they represent an important component of biodiversity in Britain. However, because of perceived difficulties in their identification, they have not received the attention that they merit. This paper aims to play a part in redressing that imbalance by listing all reliable records from Leicestershire and Rutland for the different species and analysing which species have declined locally over 100 years of recording rove beetles and which have prospered. The subfamilies treated in this first part include the largest and most conspicuous species in the family. The geographical area covered is the vice county of Leicestershire and Rutland (VC55). Some records from adjacent banks of the River Soar that technically lie in Nottinghamshire are also included. These records can be distinguished by the use of Nottinghamshire parish names. Identification Staphylinidae can be easily recognised among beetles in the field by their short wing cases that leave five or six segments of the abdomen exposed and flexible. In fact they look more like earwigs than other beetles. For identification to species, all the members of the subfamilies in this part will be covered by the forthcoming Royal Entomological Society handbook to Staphylinidae parts 6 and 7 due for publication in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Charnwood Forest
    Charnwood Forest: A Living Landscape An integrated wildlife and geological conservation implementation plan March 2009 Cover photograph: Warren Hills, Charnwood Lodge Nature Reserve (Michael Jeeves) 2 Charnwood Forest: A Living Landscape Contents Page 1. Executive summary 5 2. Introduction 8 3. A summary of the geological/geomorphological interest 13 4. Historical ecology since the Devensian glaciation 18 5. The main wildlife habitats 21 6. Overall evaluation 32 7. Summary of changes since the 1975 report 40 8. Review of recommendations in the 1975 report 42 9. Current threats 45 10. Existing nature conservation initiatives 47 11. New long-term objectives for nature conservation in Charnwood Forest 51 12. Action plan 54 13. Acknowledgements 56 14. References 57 Appendix – Gazeteer of key sites of ecological importance in Charnwood Forest Figures: 1. Charnwood Forest boundaries 2. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 3. Map showing SSSIs and Local Wildlife Site distribution 4. Tabulation of main geological formations and events in Charnwood 5. Regionally Important Geological Sites 6. Woodlands in order of vascular plant species-richness 7. Moth species-richness 8. Key sites for spiders 9. Key sites for dragonflies and damselflies 10. Evaluation of nature conservation features 11. Invertebrate Broad Assemblage Types in Charnwood listed by ISIS 12a Important ISIS Specific Assemblage Types in Charnwood Forest 3 12b Important habitat resources for invertebrates 12c Important sites for wood-decay invertebrate assemblages 12d Important sites for flowing water invertebrate assemblages 12e Important sites for permanent wet mire invertebrate assemblages 12f Important sites for other invertebrate assemblage types 13. Evaluation of species groups 14. Leicestershire Red Data Book plants 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Charnwood Forest LCA Chapter 5
    Chapter 5.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS Area 1: Bradgate, Beacon Hill and Outwoods Heathland and Forest Area 2: Ulverscroft Wooded Valley Area 3: Charley Heath and Pasture Area 4: Swithland/Woodhouse Farmland Area 5: Groby Estate Woodland Area 6: Thringstone/Markfield Quarries and Settlement Area 7: Loughborough/Shepshed Mixed Farmland Area 8: Quorn/Mountsorrel/Rothley Settlements, Quarries and Farmland Area 9: Rothley Brook Lowland Farmland Area 10: Groby/Ratby Wooded Farmland Area 11: Thornton Plantation Farmlands LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT Charnwood Forest 57 Chapter 5.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS Introduction The overall character of Charnwood Forest is of a rolling Transport infrastructure includes the M1 motorway landscape with an elevated topography and areas of corridor which runs north to south through the woodland and agriculture closely related to geology area. The influence of the motorway varies. In some and hydrology. There are contrasts between upland and areas traffic is visible while in other areas, the heavily lowland which is closely associated with watercourses vegetated embankments screen views of moving and water features within the area. traffic. Noise from traffic is a more regular feature along the corridor and affects tranquillity in areas closer to Settlement is varied with some small vernacular villages the motorway. Other main roads include the A511 such as Newtown Linford and Woodhouse and larger which provides a link from Coalville in the west to the settlements such as Markfield, Groby, Anstey and M1 and the A50 which links the M1 to the A46 and Mountsorrel as well as the fringe of Loughborough. Leicester City to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage 205 Q1 2012
    No. 205 1 January - 31 March 2012 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) FIFTY-YEAR ARCHIVE OF CLUB RECORDS NOW EASILY ACCESSIBLE Thanks to Rocio! What sets the Loughborough Naturalists' Club apart from most other similar societies is our focus on gathering and publishing biological records. Members are encouraged to write down their wildlife observations and submit their records to the editor(s) of the quarterly journal Heritage. Records for the various groups (Birds, Flowers, and so on) are collated then forwarded to specialist writers who prepare a summary for Heritage. The summaries are stitched together by the editor(s) and Heritage is published. We must have been round this loop more than 200 times now, so I guess nearly 100,000 records have been processed. The accounts in Heritage are only summaries - it is impossible to publish the full details of every record Rocio Rodriguez © Helen Ikin - but the original paper records have been archived at the Leicestershire & Rutland Environmental IN THIS EDITION Records Centre (LRERC), formerly at Holly Hayes but now housed at County Hall. These records are CLASSIFIED RECORDS available to any member willing to wade through them - there are three filing cabinets full! Ÿ Mammals Page 3 In practice, it is a time-consuming business to Ÿ visit the archive, find the relevant folder and pull Birds Page 3 out the records of interest. Searching through the Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 7 whole archive for records of a particular species, or place, or recorder, is not really practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchids and Rare Plants of Herbert's Meadow in This Edition
    No. 201 1 January – 31 March 2011 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) ORCHIDS AND RARE PLANTS OF HERBERT’S MEADOW One of the wildlife spectacles of Charnwood Forest is surely Herbert’s Meadow at orchid-time, early June. As we might expect in a semi-natural habitat, the abundance of orchids varies from year to year - 2011 seems to be a very good year indeed. Five species have been recorded at the site but one, the Green-winged Orchid Anacamptis morio, has not been seen since 1974. The two most abundant are the Common Spotted-orchid Dactylorhiza fuchsii and the Heath Spotted-orchid Dactylorhiza maculata ssp. ericetorum. There must now be thousands of each. In both species the leaves are generally spotted and the flower colour ranges from white to deep IN THIS EDITION pink, though the Heath-spotted has a tendency to be white in our local populations. The petals are CLASSIFIED RECORDS usually marked with pink streaks and dots, but what distinguishes the two species is not the colour Ÿ or markings, but the shape of the lower petal, or Mammals Page 3 lip. Common-spotted has three lobes of more-or- less equal size; whereas Heath Spotted has a Ÿ Birds Page 4 middle lobe that is distinctly smaller than the side lobes. It is not unusual to find intermediate Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 9 specimens – some of which may be genuine hybrids. I know of two plants of Bee Orchid Ophrys Ÿ Fish Page 10 apifera, the first of which appeared in 1998, flowering again in 2001, 2007 and 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Leicestershire SSSI name European Licence condition Designated Site name (where applicable) Allexton Wood All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps SSSI to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Ashby Canal SSSI No additional conditions proposed Bardon Hill Where this SSSI overlaps Bardon Hill SSSI, all vehicles must be Quarry SSSI restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint, or to areas of dense bracken/dense scrub/secondary woodland. Bardon Hill SSSI All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of dense bracken, dense scrub or conifer plantation. Barrow Gravel All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps Pits SSSI to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of dense scrub, Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. No trapping or driving of vehicles within wetland habitat. Beacon Hill, No licensed activities from 1st March to 31st August to avoid bird Hangingstone breeding season. All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. and Out Woods Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas SSSI of dense bracken/dense scrub, Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Benscliffe Wood No additional conditions proposed SSSI Blackbrook No additional conditions proposed Reservoir SSSI Botcheston Bog All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan
    Leicester, Leicestershire &Rutland BAP 2016-2016 Local Biodiversity Action Plan Floodplain wetland Action plan objectives • Create new floodplain wetland in the Soar, Wreake, Welland and Trent valleys • To maintain all existing floodplain wetland sites • Compile and maintain register of sites of local BAP quality Introduction River floodplains are important for wildlife. They encompass a range of wetland habitats including old sections of river, cut-off from the main channel and often surrounded by trees, especially willows Salix spp., marshy ground caused by the water table being at or near the surface, flooded gravel pits, wet woodland, drainage ditches along field margins, field ponds, the river channel and reedbeds. The river channel, wet woodland, reedbed and field pond habitats are covered by separate action plans. The largest areas of floodplain wetland habitat in Leicestershire and Rutland are associated with the Soar, Trent and Wreake valleys and to a lesser extent are also found along the Welland and other, smaller, rivers and brooks. Current extent A desktop Inventory was compiled in 2005 for Leicestershire County Council by Derek Lott, identifying 259 sites (see attached map). Data was collated from 3 sources: SINC [now called LWS] schedules; the Wildlife Trust’s Phase 1 survey data; and wetland beetle records held by the County 83 Leicester, Leicestershire &Rutland BAP 2016-2016 Recorder (at the time, this was Derek Lott at the time). There is also reference to a survey of the Welland from the Northamptonshire Wildlife Trust. The sites cover 107 hectares. Derek concludes that the habitat is under-represented in the Inventory, due to the lack of recent survey information along watercourses.
    [Show full text]
  • LESOPS 25 Lott Et Al
    2 A Provisional Atlas of the Carabidae of Leicestershire & Rutland Derek Lott, Graham Finch & Gareth Price LESOPS 25 (2011) ISSN 0957 - 1019 A collaborative publication from The Leicestershire & Rutland Environmental Resources Centre and The Leicestershire Entomological Society 3 FOREWORD In the spring of 2009, Derek Lott, Graham Finch & Gareth Price embarked on the production of this atlas. The idea of the atlas was the brainchild of Graham Finch, who had attended a ground beetle training course and became well aware of the need for a VC55 distribution atlas. In July 2009 a very simple first draft was produced. Derek Lott and Graham Finch scrutinized the first draft. A number of important issues needed consideration, such as taxonomic changes, the classification of sites, obtaining accurate grid references and the removal of invalid species records falsely recorded in Leicestershire and Rutland. Derek Lott provided Carabidae context to some sites in the gazetteer as well as providing species context. The production of this atlas was made much easier by the life-long work of Derek Lott, who had already accumulated vast amounts of ground beetle data and local knowledge, without which this atlas would not have been possible. Special thanks go the Carabidae recorders who have sent in records. We have endeavoured to reference and acknowledge the people and sources that have helped in the production of this atlas but often with natural history publications there are too many people to thank over a very long period of time. Our apologies go to the people or sources that have been inadvertently omitted. The gazetteer obtained information from a number of sources, in particular the Flora of Leicestershire (Primavesi & Evans, 1988) and the Flora of Rutland (Messenger, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton Under Bardon Screening Statement
    Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under- Bardon Neighbourhood Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Statement October 2020 0 Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under-Bardon Neighbourhood Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Statement Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Details of the Neighbourhood Plan ....................................................................................... 3 Title of the plan: ............................................................................................................................. 3 Name of Qualifying Body and Local Planning Authority: ...................................................... 3 Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under-Bardon Parish Neighbourhood Plan contact point: ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Location and spatial extent of the Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under-Bardon Neighbourhood Plan: ................................................................................................................... 3 Timeframe of the Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under-Bardon Neighbourhood Plan: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Main aims of the Bagworth, Thornton and Stanton-under-Bardon Neighbourhood Plan: .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage 200 Q4 2010
    No. 200 1 October - 31 December 2010 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) HERITAGE REACHES THE TWO HUNDREDTH EDITION Heritage started in 1961 as a summary of records put into a portfolio, which was circulated to members, each member adding their sightings for the quarter before passing it on. The first editor was Peter Gamble who wrote all the reports himself, using the records in the portfolio. In 1969, special Field Notes record sheets were produced and members sent records by post IN THIS EDITION to the editor. With Heritage 21 in spring 1966, coloured headings were added – a different colour CLASSIFIED RECORDS for each quarter. These coloured strips had to be Ÿ Mammals Page 2 printed separately from the text and the text added over them. Ÿ Birds Page 3 Pat Candlish, later to become Pat Evans, took over as editor from Heritage 33 in 1969 and other Ÿ members had the responsibility for writing some Fish Page 7 of the sections and contributing leading articles. Members could buy smart green files to store their Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 8 copies of Heritage. We had Club ties and headscarves patterned with the Curlew logo, too, Ÿ in those days. Pat edited Heritage for 67 issues, Dragonflies & Damselflies Page 8 including the extended 100th edition with its lovely silver cover, before handing over to Monica Gillham Ÿ Grasshoppers and Bushcrickets Page 9 for Heritage 101 in 1986. With No.101 the size changed to A4 from the previous quarto.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage 202 Q2 2011
    No. 202 1 April – 30 June 2011 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) CLASSIFIED RECORDS A dead Pygmy Shrew was found in J & CG’s Holwell garden and another dead shrew, yet to MAMMALS be identified, on a path at Grace Dieu. Five members have seen Hedgehogs, ATO Only one report of a bat was received this has two visiting his Loughborough garden, the quarter, from HS at Quorn where one was larger one has blond spikes with two brown circling the garden in early May. patches. GF has had as many as three regularly visiting his Scraptoft garden, DAP saw a medium IN THIS EDITION specimen on the road verge in Quorn at about 4 pm on 9 May and one triggered a security light in Groby. CLASSIFIED RECORDS The only squashed Hedgehog was near Ÿ Lount. HB remarks that he rarely sees dead Mammals Page 1 Hedgehogs now as he cycles around Leicester and east Leicestershire and wonders of they are Ÿ Birds Page 2 becoming smarter or scarcer? Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 8 Molehills were noted throughout the quarter at Swithland and also recorded at Ÿ Fish Page 8 Bradgate, Peckleton, Grace Dieu and in Bob’s Closs behind the Community Centre at Ÿ Dragonflies and Damselflies Page 9 Thringstone. Ÿ Rabbits were plentiful and healthy in Grasshoppers and Bushcrickets Page 10 Swithland and other sightings came from New Ÿ Lount, Sheet Hedges Wood and Prestwold Hall, Butterflies Page 10 Quorn, Wymondham, Woodhouse and around the nature reserves at Holwell.
    [Show full text]