DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Oil Possibilities of the Moab Distbict, Gkand and San Juan Counties, Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Oil Possibilities of the Moab Distbict, Gkand and San Juan Counties, Utah UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR .Hay Lyman Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 841 GEOLOGY AND OIL POSSIBILITIES OF THE MOAB DISTBICT, GKAND AND SAN JUAN COUNTIES, UTAH BY A. A. BAKER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1933 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - Price 50 cents (Paper covers) c*, "* i A. * * CONTENTS * Page ^ .Abstract. ______ _ ;. __ ,. - ----------- 1 Introduction..... _ ___ _ -- - 2 Search for oil in the region..... -- ____ _--- _-_ 2 Location and extent of area._ --_-_ _ ---_-- 2 * Purpose and scope of work.. __--______ _ 2 Field work. _ _ _ _- _ -_ 3 '*" Acknowledgments _________--_------______--___-_---------_____ 5 Geography _____________________________ _ _________________________ 5 Topography-____________._-_______--_--_--------------------- 5 Drainage and water supply..__ -_ ____ _-_ 7 Climate __ ___ - --_-_ _ _-__ 8 * Population. _________.________-__-___-_ ----_---_--._ 9 y Accessibility and routes of travel.------------------------------. 9 * Fuel....---------..--.-------------------------- 10 Previous publications._______ _ - _-_ - 10 ** Stratigraphy.. __ ____ _ ^.. 12 General features.______ __ __ -_-_ _--_---------_-__ 12 Carboniferous system_______________________________________ 13 y, Pennsylvanian (?) series-__ __ ____ _ _ 13 Paradox formation.. ___ - 13 Pennsylvanian series ___-_---___-___-_-____-____-_--_____ 18 Hermosa formation________ r _________________________ 18 Permian series.__-_____------_------__-_____---_----__.___ 23 Rico formation--. --_ _ 23 Cutler formation... 0 -__-_ __ 29 Unconformity between Cutler and Moenkopi formations. .. 33 Triassic system ______ _ _ __ _______ _ _ ____ 34 Lower Triassic series. - __ 34 Moenkopi formation.___ _ ______ ______________________ 34 Unconformity at the top of the Moenkopi formation. _____ 36 Upper (?) Triassic series__------_-____-_----__-_---_--._-__ 37 Shinarump conglomerate...____________________________ 37 Upper Triassic series.... __ 38 Chinle formation____________________ _ ______________ 38 Contact of Chinle and Wingate formations_______________ 41 . Jurassic (?) system _____- -_________ __ __ _ _ ___- 42 Glen Canyon group_____------------__--____ ____________ 42 Wingate sandstone.___________________________________ 42 Kayenta formation..__________________________________ 44. Navajo sandstone. ______________________________________ 46 Unconformity (?) at the top of the Navajo sandstone.. 47 Jurassic system_______________________________________________ 48 Upper Jurassic series.___----____--_-__--_____-____________ 48 San Rafael group_____------_--__-_-_-_-_____-___-.__. 48 Carmel formation. __ _ _ ._ __. _..____ 48 Entrada sandstone.___-___--_-___-___________--__. 49 Contact of Entrada and Summerville formations...___ 50 Summerville formation__________________________ 51 IV CONTENTS Stratigraphy Continued. Page Cretaceous (?) system_____________________.___________________ 52 Lower Cretaceous (?) series.._____________________________ 52 Morrison formation,__________________________________ 52 Cretaceous system.___________________________________________ 54 Upper Cretaceous series..__________________________________ 54 Dakota (?) sandstone---_----__--_-_-_____-____________ 54 Mancos shale.___--___________________-_____.__________ 55 Tertiary (?) system..________________________________________ 56 Quaternary system.___________________________________________ 57 Igneous rocks.____________________________________________________ 59 Structure-_______________________________________________________ 59 General features.___-_--------_--_____-____-----_-__-_____.___ 59 Methods of representing structure___________________-____.________ 60 Details of folds..._____...___________________________ 61 Castle Creek anticline.____________ ________________________ 61 Courthouse syncline.---_--_---------_--____-_--_--._______ 62 Moab and Spanish Valleys_____________________________ 63 General features.--_-------_---------__-_--------_---- 63 Moab anticline__________--_------_--__----_----_---_- 64 Spanish Valley syncline._____--_-__-____-_-_--_--__--__ 66 Pack Creek synclinal graben.._______-___--_--_:_-______ 66 Kings Bottom syncline--_____-_-_--------_-_----_--_-----_- 67 Cane Creek anticline.______-_________-_--__---_-_--__--___ 68 Shaferdome____________________________________________ 68 Hatch Point area of irregular low folding._-___--________-_-__ 69 Lockhart anticline__-_______-_-____--_-___-_--___-_-_-_- 69 Rustler dome----------_-__-----_-------_-_--------------- 69 Gibson dome.__-_--_______-_-_---____----_----_----_----- 70 Lockhart syncline--_--_________________---_-_-_-_-____-___ 70 Monocline in southern part of district.______________________ 71 Big Indian-Lisbon Valley faulted anticline_____-__-____-_-____ 71 Meander anticline_____-____________-___-_-_--___--___---__ 71 Faults. 72 General features._____-___-______-___-----_----_---------- 72 Shay graben__________________________________________ 73 Needles fault zone____________--___-_-___---_.-----.---- 73 Effect of movements in the salt on geologic structure ______________ 74 Periods of deformation___________________-____----__------_-_ 77 Oil and gas________---___--__----___-------_------_---_----------- 80 History of drilling_______ ________________._-_______--__---__ 80 Possibility of oil and gas production______-_---___---__----_-_-_- 83 Uranium and vanadium_____ _____________________________________ 84 Salt, gypsum, and potash______--________-------------------------- 84 Records of wells-.-----.--- _ ________ ___ 85 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Geologic map and sections of Moab district. ____.__-.____ In 2. Map showing geologic structure of Moab district.___.___._ In-podse*. *' t 3. A, Moab Valley looking east from a point near the entrance to the canyon of the Colorado River below Moab; B, Forma- * tions exposed west of the Colorado River at the crest of the Shafer dome_________-_____-_-----_---_-----.__--______ 10 * 4. A, Intraformational unconformity in the Rico formation in Indian Creek Canyon, in sec. 4, T. 29^ S., R. 20 E.; B, North Sixshooter Peak in Indian Creek Valley near the mouth of +. Da vis Canyon...____.____.___.____________ 10 5. A, Outcrop of Moenkopi formation on the north side of Indian * Creek Valley near the mouth of Hart Draw; B, Outcrop of Moenkopi formation in an isolated butte near the mouth of *» - Castle Creek_________________________________________ 10 6. A, Angular discordance between Chinfe and Moenkopi forma­ tions on northeast side of Cane Creek anticline in the valley of v Cane Creek in sec. 33, T. 26 S., R. 21 E.; B, Formations ex­ posed at crest of Cane Creek anticline on west side of Cane Creek in narrow ridge between it and the Colorado River, in sec. 32, T. 26 S., R. 21 E________________________________ 10 > c 7.. A, Formations exposed on east side of Davis Canyon about 1 mile west of the southwest corner of sec. 19, T. 31 S., R. 21 E.; x B., Sandstone dome near the upper road crossing of Indian Creek in sec. 20, T. 32 S., R. 22 E________________ 10 8. A, Outcrop of Navajo sandstone in Mill Creek Canyon showing . typical cross-bedding; B, Cliffs of Entrada sandstone at Cane Springs, in sec. 1, T. 28 S., R. 22 E_______________._ 10 . 9. A, Dakota (?) sandstone forming bench in SE. % sec. 23, T. 28 S., ff R. 23 E., near head of Muleshoe Wash; B, View south along ^, Twin Valley graben from a point near the north end.________ 10 10. A, View north along Devils Pocket graben; B, South end of Devils Pocket graben.__________________________________ 10 11. Generalized columnar section of the rocks exposed at the surface *" in the Moabdistrict__.__________________________________ 10 )N FIGURE 1. Index map of Utah showing location of the Moab district..... 3 2. Diagram illustrating inferred lateral changes in Paradox forma- tion and changes in thickness resulting from movement in the *" salt________________.___...._____________ 15 3. Tentative correlation of part of the Carboniferous formations between southwestern Colorado, the Moab district, Utah, * and the Grand Canyon district, Ariz. ____________________ 19 v GEOLOGY AND OIL POSSIBILITIES OF THE MOAB DIS- TEICT, GKAND AND SAN JUAN COUNTIES, UTAH By ARTHUR A. BAKER ABSTRACT + . The Moab district is part of the Colorado Plateau and includes an area of about 1,000 square miles east of the Colorado River in Grand and San Juan ^ Counties, southeastern Utah.' The study of the geology presented here was made in 1926 and 1927, after drilled wells had encountered showings of oil and ^ gas and had disclosed the presence of thick beds of salt. The Paradox formation, which contains the salt, is the oldest exposed forma- *. tion and lias been tentatively assigned to the lower Pennsylvanian. Most of the information concerning the Paradox has been obtained from wells, for its surface outcrops are limited to small masses of gypsum. Younger rocks that crop out include the Hermosa formation, of Pennsylvanian age; the Rico and Cutler formations, of Permian age; the Mo.enkopi, Shinarump, and Chinle for­ mations, of Triassic age; the Wingate sandstone, Kayenta formation, and Navajo sandstone, tentatively assigned to the Jurassic; the Carmel formation, ± Entrada sandstone, and Summerville formation, of Jurassic age; the Morrison formation, tentatively assigned to the Cretaceous; and the Dakota (?) sandstone ».; and Mancos shale of Upper Cretaceous age. This area is a.critical one in the study of Permian stratigraphy, because there
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High-Resolution Correlation of the Upper Cretaceous Stratigraphy Between the Book Cliffs and the Western Henry Mountains Syncline, Utah, U.S.A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences 5-2012 HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A. Drew L. Seymour University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Geology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Seymour, Drew L., "HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A." (2012). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 88. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/88 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH, U.S.A. By Drew L. Seymour A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Christopher R. Fielding Lincoln, NE May, 2012 HIGH-RESOLUTION CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN THE BOOK CLIFFS AND THE WESTERN HENRY MOUNTAINS SYNCLINE, UTAH. U.S.A. Drew L. Seymour, M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Shinarump No. 1 Uranium Mine, Seven Mile Canyon Area, Grand County, Utah
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 336 GEOLOGY OF THE SHINARUMP NO. 1 URANIUM MINE, SEVEN MILE CANYON AREA, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 336 GEOLOGY OF THE SHINARUMP NO. 1 URANIUM MINE, SEVEN MILE CANYON AREA, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH By W. L Pinch This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. __________Washington, D. C., 1954 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. , B E A V E R * 'IRON .-'I GAR WASHINGTON L K«n«b'p U A.R I EXPLANATION Uranium deposit or group of deposits in the Shinarump conglomerate Uranium deposit or group of deposits in the Chfnle formation 25 0 I i i i i I Figure 1. Map of part of the Colorado Plateau showing the location of the Shinarump No. 1 mine and the distribu­ tion of uranium deposits in the Shinarump and Chinle formations. GEOLOGY OF THE SHINARUMP NO. 1 URANIUM MINE, SEVEN MILE CANYON AREA, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH By W. I. Finch CONTENTS Page Page Abstract..................................... 1 History and production........................ 4 Introduction.................................. 2 Ore deposits................................. 4 General geology............................... 2 Mineralogy.................................. 5 Stratigraphy............................. 2 Petrology.................................... 6 Stratigraphic section................ 2 Habits of ore bodies .......................... 9 Cutler formation.................... 3 Spectrographic study.......................... 10 Moenkopi formation................. 3 Age determinations of uraninite...............
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cenomanian Foraminifers from the Southern Part of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    Upper Cenomanian Foraminifers from the Southern Part of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1808-N AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Sales, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents. copies of periodicals (Earthquakes & Volcanoes. Preliminary De­ termination of Epicenters), and some miscellaneous reports, includ­ ANCHORAGE, Alaska-4230 University Dr., Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • English Information
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park … the light seems to flow or shine out of the rock rather than to be reflected English from it. – Clarence Dutton, geologist and early explorer of Capitol Reef, 1880s A Wrinkle in the Earth A vibrant palette of color spills across the landscape before bridges, and twisting canyons. Over millions of years geologic forces you. The hues are constantly changing, altered by the play shaped, lifted, and folded the earth, creating this rugged, remote area of light against the towering cliffs, massive domes, arches, known as the Waterpocket Fold. Panorama Point at Sunset Erosion creates waterpockets and potholes that collect The Castle is made of fractured Wingate Sandstone perched upon grey Chinle and red Moenkopi Formations. rainwater and snowmelt, enhancing a rich ecosystem. From the east, the Waterpocket Fold appears as a formidable barrier Capitol Dome reminded early travelers of the US Capitol to travel, much like a barrier reef in an ocean. building and later inspired the name of the park. Creating the Waterpocket Fold Capitol Reef’s defining geologic feature is a wrinkle in Uplift: Between 50 and 70 million years ago, an ancient fault was Earth’s crust, extending nearly 100 miles from Thousand reactivated during a time of tectonic activity, lifting the layers to the Lake Mountain to Lake Powell. It was created over time by west of the fault over 7,000 feet higher than those to the east. Rather three gradual, yet powerful processes—deposition, uplift, than cracking, the rock layers folded over the fault line.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Stratigraphy Column
    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geology “Geology knows no such word as forever.” —Wallace Stegner Capitol Reef National Park’s geologic story reveals a nearly complete set of Mesozoic-era sedimentary layers. For 200 million years, rock layers formed at or near sea level. About 75-35 million years ago tectonic forces uplifted them, forming the Waterpocket Fold. Forces of erosion have been sculpting this spectacular landscape ever since. Deposition If you could travel in time and visit Capitol Visiting Capitol Reef 180 million years ago, Reef 245 million years ago, you would not when the Navajo Sandstone was deposited, recognize the landscape. Imagine a coastal you would have been surrounded by a giant park, with beaches and tidal flats; the water sand sea, the largest in Earth’s history. In this moves in and out gently, shaping ripple marks hot, dry climate, wind blew over sand dunes, in the wet sand. This is the environment creating large, sweeping crossbeds now in which the sediments of the Moenkopi preserved in the sandstone of Capitol Dome Formation were deposited. and Fern’s Nipple. Now jump ahead 20 million years, to 225 All the sedimentary rock layers were laid million years ago. The tidal flats are gone and down at or near sea level. Younger layers were the climate supports a tropical jungle, filled deposited on top of older layers. The Moenkopi with swamps, primitive trees, and giant ferns. is the oldest layer visible from the visitor center, The water is stagnant and a humid breeze with the younger Chinle Formation above it.
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
    Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic Stratigraphy of the Southeastern Colorado Plateau, West-Central New Mexico Spencer G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: https://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/72 Triassic stratigraphy of the southeastern Colorado Plateau, west-central New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas, 2021, pp. 229-240 in: Geology of the Mount Taylor area, Frey, Bonnie A.; Kelley, Shari A.; Zeigler, Kate E.; McLemore, Virginia T.; Goff, Fraser; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana S., New Mexico Geological Society 72nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 310 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2021 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, Color Plates, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesaverde Group and Wasatch Formation - Piceance Basin, Colorado
    NONTRIBUTARY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT: MESAVERDE GROUP AND WASATCH FORMATION - PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADO Submitted to: OXY USA INC. AND OXY USA WTP LP Date: November 4, 2009 Norwest Corporation 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80246 Tel: (303) 782-0164 Fax: (303) 782-2560 Email [email protected] www.norwestcorp.com 004280 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1-1 2 CONCEPTUAL MODEL .....................................................................................................2-1 2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING ....................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Mancos Shale ..............................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Iles Formation ..............................................................................................2-2 2.1.3 Williams Fork Formation ..............................................................................2-2 2.1.4 Wasatch Formation......................................................................................2-3 2.2 HYDROLOGIC DATA .....................................................................................................2-3 3 HYDROLOGEOLOGIC PARAMETERS.............................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geology: Making Utah's Geology More Accessible. View South-East
    5/28/13 Utah Geology: Geologic Road Guides Utah Geology: Making Utah's geology more accessible. View south-east over St. George, Utah Road Guide Quick Select. Selection Map HW-160, 163 & 191 Tuba City to Kayenta, Bluff & Montecello, Utah (through Monument Valley) 0.0 Junction of U.S. Highways 160 and 89 , HW-160 Road Guide. follows U.S. Highway 160 east toward Tuba city and Kayenta. U.S. Highway 89 leads south toward the entrance to Grand Canyon National Park and Flagstaff. For a route description along U.S. Highway 89 northward from here see HW-89A Road Guide.. The road junction is in the Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle Formation. The member is composed of interbedded stream channel sandstone and varicolored shale and mudstone. This member erodes moderately easily and forms the strike valley to the north and south. From here the route of this guide leads upsection into younger and younger beds of the Chinle Formation. 0.7 Cross Hamblin Wash and rise from the Petrified Forest Member into the pinkish banded Owl Rock Member of the Chinle Formation. The upper member forms pronounced laminated pinkish gray and green badlands, distinctly unlike the rounded Painted Desert-type massive badlands of the underlying member. 1.6 Road rises up through the upper part of the Chinle Formation, a typical wavy to hummocky road. Highway construction is easy across the slope-forming parts of the formation, but holding the road after construction is difficult because the soft volcanic ash-bearing shales heave under load or after wetting and drying.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy at Durango, Colorado
    160 New Mexico Geological Society, 56th Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Chama Basin, 2005, p. 160-169. LUCAS AND HECKERT MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AT DURANGO, COLORADO SPENCER G. LUCAS AND ANDREW B. HECKERT New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Rd. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104 ABSTRACT.—A nearly 3-km-thick section of Mesozoic sedimentary rocks is exposed at Durango, Colorado. This section con- sists of Upper Triassic, Middle-Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous strata that well record the geological history of southwestern Colorado during much of the Mesozoic. At Durango, Upper Triassic strata of the Chinle Group are ~ 300 m of red beds deposited in mostly fluvial paleoenvironments. Overlying Middle-Upper Jurassic strata of the San Rafael Group are ~ 300 m thick and consist of eolian sandstone, salina limestone and siltstone/sandstone deposited on an arid coastal plain. The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation is ~ 187 m thick and consists of sandstone and mudstone deposited in fluvial environments. The only Lower Cretaceous strata at Durango are fluvial sandstone and conglomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation. Most of the overlying Upper Cretaceous section (Dakota, Mancos, Mesaverde, Lewis, Fruitland and Kirtland units) represents deposition in and along the western margin of the Western Interior seaway during Cenomanian-Campanian time. Volcaniclastic strata of the overlying McDermott Formation are the youngest Mesozoic strata at Durango. INTRODUCTION Durango, Colorado, sits in the Animas River Valley on the northern flank of the San Juan Basin and in the southern foothills of the San Juan and La Plata Mountains. Beginning at the northern end of the city, and extending to the southern end of town (from north of Animas City Mountain to just south of Smelter Moun- tain), the Animas River cuts in an essentially downdip direction through a homoclinal Mesozoic section of sedimentary rocks about 3 km thick (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Stake, 6. Pigeon
    NAMES OF MINES. Location indicated on the map by numbers. NUMERICAL LIST. ALPHABETICAL LIST. 1. Johnny Bull. 79. Alma Mater. A. B. G., 31. Little Maggie Shaft, 99. 2. Gold Anchor Tunnel. 80. Phoenix No. 1 Level. Air shaft, 147. Logan No. 2 Shaft, 38. 3. Albion. 81. Pelican. .Albion, 3. Logan Shaft, 44. 4. Caledonia Shaft. 82. Last Chance". Allegheny, 97. Logan Tunnel (site), 37. 5. Utah. 83. Phoenix No. 4 Level. Alma Mater, 79. Logan Tunnel, 56. 6. Marriage Stake. 84. Nellie Bly Lower Tunnel. Argentine, 92. M. A. C. Lower Tunnel, 25. 7. Hand-out Shaft. 65. Nellie Bly Upper Tunnel. Argonaut, 124. M. A. C. Upper Tunnel, 24. 8. Golden 1900. 86. Eureka. Aspen Shaft, 155. Magnet, 64. 9. Belzora. 87. Old Butler Tunnel. Atlantic Cable, 72. Marriage Stake, 6. 10. San Juan. 88. Hope and Cross. Aztec, 61. Mediterranean, 95. " , 11. Zenith. 89. Bourbon. Bancroft, 121. M. M V P., 53. 12. Christina Shaft. 90. Uncle Ned. - Bancroft Shaft, 120. Mohawk, 20. 13. Lackawanna. 91. Worlds Fair. Belzora, 9. Monterey, 40. 14. Flying Fish. 92. Argentine. Black Hawk, 96>.' Montezuma, 74. 15. Flying Fish Upper Tunnel. 93. Iron. Blaine and Logan Tunnel, 35. Montezuma Shaft, 153. 16. Southern Consolidated Tunnel. 94. Laxy. Bourbon, 89. Mountain Spring Tunnel, 49. 17. Puzzler. 95. Mediterranean. Caledonia Shaft, 4. N. A. Cowdrey, 127. 18. Petzite. 96. Black.Hawk. California, 62. Nellie Bly Lower Tunnel, 84. 19. Great Western. 97. Allegheny. Calumet, 75. Nellie Bly Upper Tunnel, 85. 20. Mohawk. 98. Lelia Davis. C. A.R.,57. Old Butler Tunnel, 87.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 2014 Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Paleobiology Commons Repository Citation Hamilton, Joanna, "Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado" (2014). Honors Projects. 116. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/116 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton Bowling Green State University Department of Geology April 2013 Introduction: The Hermosa Group The Hermosa Group is a Pennsylvanian (~310 Ma) rock unit found in the southwestern San Juan Mountains and the Paradox Basin. The Paradox Basin is a northwest-southeast trending basin related to the Uncompahgre Uplift in the north, salt deposition and movement throughout, and a Precambrian fault system in the underlying basement rocks (Brown 2002, Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009). The Uncompahgre Uplift occurred in response to the Ouachita – Marathon Orogeny (related to the Ancestral Rocky Mountains Orogeny) caused by the collision of North America and South America-Africa during the Late Mississippian (~ 320 Ma) (Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009, Pazzaglia et al. 1999). The Paradox Basin formed as a complimentary subsidence basin alongside the uplifted area (Brown 2002). When the basin subsided, smaller structural features formed within it, including step-down grabens close to the uplift and folded areas further away (Baars and Stevenson 1981, Brown 2002).
    [Show full text]