The Past, Present and Future of Light-Gated Ion Channels and Optogenetics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Past, Present and Future of Light-Gated Ion Channels and Optogenetics FEATURE ARTICLE 2018 GAIRDNER AWARDS The past, present and future of light-gated ion channels and optogenetics Abstract The discovery of the mechanisms underlying light-gated ion channels called channelrhodospins and the subsequent development of optogenetics illustrates how breakthroughs in science and technology can span multiple levels of scientific inquiry. Our knowledge of how channelrhodopsins work emerged from research at the microscopic level that investigated the structure and function of algal proteins. Optogenetics, on the other hand, exploits the power of channelrhodospins and similar proteins to investigate phenomena at the supra-macroscopic level, notably the neural circuits involved in animal behavior that may be relevant for understanding neuropsychiatric disease. This article is being published to celebrate Peter Hegemann, Karl Deisseroth and Ed Boyden receiving a 2018 Canada Gairdner International Award "for the discovery of light-gated ion channel mechanisms, and for the discovery of optogenetics, a technology that has revolutionized neuroscience". SHEENA A JOSSELYN The award, part I: Light-gated ion encoding a cation channel, by Hegemann (then channels at the University of Regensburg) and co-workers icrobial opsin genes encode light-sen- in 2002 (Nagel et al., 2002). Although the back- M sitive proteins that are found mostly bone of the channelrhodopsin protein is a famil- in archaea and bacteria. Examples iar 7-transmembrane structure common to many include bacteriorhodopsins (which are proton proteins (including the G-protein coupled recep- pumps), halorhodopsins (ion pumps) and chan- tor family of proteins that is targeted by many nelrhodopsins (ion channels). Channelrhodospins drugs), channelrhodospins are distinct in their are unique in that they are the only class of light- ability to conduct particular ions in response to activated ion channels identified in biology to certain colors of light, all within milliseconds. date. They are also the foundations on which the Precisely how channelrhodopsin accomplished research that is being recognized by one of the this remarkable feat became a biological 2018 Canada Gairdner International Awards was mystery. built. Over the next fifteen years or so, Hegemann Over many years, Peter Hegemann and col- (who moved to Humboldt University in Berlin in leagues studied the behavior of the single-celled 2004), Karl Deisseroth (Stanford University) and green alga Chlamydomonas. These algae alter colleagues uncovered the functional operating the direction in which they swim in response to principles of channelrhodopsin, down to the flashes of light. Based on the fast time course of level of determining the individual amino acids this phototactic response, Hegemann hypothe- that regulate ion flow, gating kinetics and color sized the presence of a single protein with two selectivity (Deisseroth and Hegemann, 2017). Copyright Josselyn. This article is key components (one to ’sense’ the light, and The high-resolution crystal structures of the cat- distributed under the terms of the one to ’respond’ to the light by initiating an ion-conducting channelrhodopsins were solved Creative Commons Attribution electrical signal that leads to a change in the earlier this decade (Kato et al., 2012), and the License, which permits unrestricted direction they are swimming). This work culmi- structures of anion-conducting channelrhodop- use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are nated in the molecular and functional identifica- sins have just been solved (Kim et al., 2018; credited. tion of the first channelrhodopsin gene, Kato et al., 2018). Josselyn. eLife 2018;7:e42367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42367 1 of 5 Feature article 2018 Gairdner Awards The past, present and future of light-gated ion channels and optogenetics The development of optogenetics animals. The development of opsins for neuronal silencing rounded out the optogenetics toolbox cleanly splits neuroscience, and (Han and Boyden, 2007; Zhang et al., 2007; many other branches of science, Chow et al., 2010; Gradinaru et al., 2010). Optogenetics allows scientists to achieve precise into pre- and post-optogenetic eras. temporal control over the activity of defined populations of cells in the brain of a behaving animal, and thus probe the circuits mediating both brain function and dysfunction. These structural insights also enabled a series The development of optogenetics cleanly of further advances: examples include engi- splits neuroscience, and many other branches of neered channelrhodopsins that respond to light science, into pre- and post-optogenetic eras. As faster than wildtype channelrhodopsins with any new technique, the first findings using (Gunaydin et al., 2010); channelrhodopsins that optogenetics were simply confirmatory. But, as act as bi-stable switches (Berndt et al., 2009); scientists grew past the ’gee whiz’ factor and channelrhodopsins that are activated by differ- became more adept at designing experiments ent wavelengths of light (Zhang et al., 2008; that fully exploited this new way of investigating Yizhar et al., 2011); and channelrhodopsin- brain function, novel – and perhaps previously based chloride channels (Berndt et al., 2014; unknowable – insights began to emerge. Wietek et al., 2014). This series of fundamental Among the many notable scientific insights scientific discoveries examining how channelrho- enabled by optogenetics, I would include: dopsins (and related proteins) respond to light . Uncovering how complex behavioral states with such speed and precision also led to a new (such as anxiety) arise from individual state experimental tool, optogenetics, that could be features (including changes in respiration used to control the activity of selected cells and risk-avoidance behavior), and the deep within systems as complex as the mamma- brain circuit components underlying these lian brain with extraordinary temporal and spa- states (Kim et al., 2013). Optogenetics, tial precision. As the prize citation notes: for the first time, enabled the independent "optogenetics is a technology that has revolu- manipulation of the activity of different tionized the field of neuroscience". output projections originating from the same brain region, thereby allowing com- plex behavioral states to be dissected into The award, part II: Optogenetics component features and mapped across Understanding the brain has been described as the brain. one of the final frontiers of science. Of course, Identifying the long-sought cell ensembles there was significant progress towards this goal (engrams) underlying memory (Liu et al., 2012), and taking advantage of optoge- before optogenetics entered the scientific lexi- netic actuators to both increase and con. But a step change in the type of scientific decrease activity in the same neurons to questions that could be asked, and the practical discover how these ensembles control the ways in which many scientists conduct research, separation or integration of individual can be traced back to a single paper from Dei- memories (Rashid et al., 2016). sseroth’s lab in which he and co-workers – Ed . Illuminating the cell ensembles that sup- Boyden, Feng Zhang (who shared the 2016 Can- port basic survival drives and control the ada Gairdner International Award for his work most fundamental functions (for example, on CRISPR-Cas and genome editing), hunger, thirst, energy balance, respiration, along with Ernst Bamberg and Georg Nagel – arousal, sleep, circadian rhythm). These cir- reported that the activity of neurons in a dish cuits contained cell types with diverse (even opposite) functional roles and there- expressing channelrhodopsin could be driven by fore required the power of optogenetics simply shining a light (Boyden et al., 2005). to resolve them (beginning with Subsequent papers described the develop- Adamantidis et al., 2007). ment of other, equally important, optogenetic . Determining specific cells and neural path- components – tools for targeting opsins ways controlling normal and abnormal (Tsai et al., 2009) and light (Adamantidis et al., motor action patterns. A long-standing 2007) to circuit elements of interest in behaving question in movement initiation was Josselyn. eLife 2018;7:e42367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42367 2 of 5 Feature article 2018 Gairdner Awards The past, present and future of light-gated ion channels and optogenetics answered with optogenetic experiments neuromodulators, intracellular signaling and which revealed the differential roles of other brain molecules. intermixed striatal direct vs. indirect path- Optogenetics ushered in an era of neurosci- ways (Kravitz et al., 2010). In addition to ence in which neuronal circuits became the new increasing our understanding of adaptive basic unit of inquiry. In many ways, the ’optoge- movement regulation, this insight also has netic revolution’ echoed, and perhaps to some clinical relevance for Parkinsonism and extent eclipsed, an earlier revolution in molecu- related disorders. Discovering the essential circuit basis of lar neuroscience. Further evolution of neurosci- reward; with optogenetics, bursts of activ- ence as field, though, may demand the seamless ity in midbrain dopamine neurons were integration of these two pillars. The develop- finally and formally shown to constitute a ment of artificial light-inducible molecules is one reward signal, beginning with relatively way to increase interactions between the circuit simple Pavlovian conditioning
Recommended publications
  • Determinants of Channelrhodopsin Ion Selectivity
    Structural foundations of optogenetics: Determinants of channelrhodopsin ion selectivity Andre Berndta,1, Soo Yeun Leea,1, Jonas Wietekb,1, Charu Ramakrishnana, Elizabeth E. Steinbergc,d, Asim J. Rashide, Hoseok Kimf, Sungmo Parke, Adam Santoroe, Paul W. Franklande, Shrivats M. Iyera, Sally Paka, Sofie Ährlund-Richterf, Scott L. Delpa, Robert C. Malenkac,d, Sheena A. Josselyne, Marie Carlénf, Peter Hegemannb, and Karl Deisserotha,c,g,2 aDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; bInstitute for Biology, Experimental Biophysics, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; cDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; dNancy Pritzker Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; eProgram in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8; fDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; and gHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2012. Contributed by Karl Deisseroth, November 30, 2015 (sent for review November 16, 2015; reviewed by Lily Yeh Jan and Anatol Kreitzer) The structure-guided design of chloride-conducting channelrhodop- Converging lines of work recently achieved the latter goal; resolving sins has illuminated mechanisms underlying ion selectivity of this the high-resolution structure of channelrhodopsin (7) allowed a remarkable family of light-activated ion channels. The first gener- principled structure-guided approach to engineering for chloride ation of chloride-conducting channelrhodopsins, guided in part by selectivity by testing an electrostatic model for pore function (8, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Rapport Annuel
    Rapport annuel 2018 Mai 2019 - TABLE DES MATIÈRES À propos de Gairdner 2 Message du président du conseil 3 Message de la présidente et directrice scientifique 4 Revue de l’année 2018 5 Lauréats des prix Canada Gairdner 2018 7 Programme de sensibilisation des étudiants 2018 9 Programme national 2018 13 Conférence des lauréats des Prix Gairdner 2018 16 Symposium de recherche Canada Gairdner 2018 17 Autres programmes de Gairdner à travers le Canada 18 Gairdner remercie ses bailleurs de fonds de 2018 23 L’année à venir : objectifs pour 2019 24 Gouvernance 25 Conseil d’administration 2018 25 Comités permanents du conseil d’administration 26 Comités de la Fondation Gairdner 27 Comité d’examen médical 27 Conseil consultatif médical 28 Comité consultatif du Prix Wightman 30 Comité consultatif du Prix en santé mondiale 30 Faits saillants financiers de 2018 31 Personnel de la Fondation Gairdner 32 Rapport d’audit 33 Fondation Gairdner – Rapport annuel 2018 1 À PROPOS DE GAIRDNER Historique La Fondation Gairdner a été créée en 1957 dans le but de décerner des prix annuels à des chercheurs individuels dont les découvertes en sciences biomédicales ont eu un impact majeur sur le progrès de la science et sur la santé humaine. Chaque année, sept prix sont décernés : cinq Prix internationaux Canada Gairdner, pour l’excellence en recherche biomédicale, le Prix Canada Gairdner en santé mondiale John Dirks, pour des réalisations exceptionnelles en recherche sur la santé mondiale, et le Prix Canada Gairdner Wightman, réservé à un scientifique canadien ayant démontré un leadership exceptionnel en sciences médicales au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • From Channelrhodopsins to Optogenetics ACCESS
    Perspective OPEN From channelrhodopsins to optogenetics ACCESS From channelrhodopsins to optogenetics We did not expect that research on the and identified the role of Ca2þ influx in forming a single protein complex (Braun molecular mechanism of algal phototaxis flagellar beat frequency changes (Halldal, & Hegemann, 1999). or archaeal light-driven ion transport 1957, Schmidt & Eckert, 1976). Then Oleg In parallel, biophysicists had character- might interest readers of a medical Sineshchekov from Moscow State Uni- ized the precise nature of light-regulated journal when we conceived and per- versity recorded electrical light responses ion transport across cellular membranes. formed our experiments a decade ago. On from Haematococcus pluvialis, an alga Some of these studies started with the other hand, it did not escape our known for the production of the anti- investigations on animal rhodopsin and attention that channelrhodopsin is helping oxidant Astaxanthine (Litvin et al, 1978). even suggested rhodopsin-mediated an ever-increasing number of researchers Oleg used a suction pipette technique light-induced calcium entry with rhodop- to address their specific questions. For applied at the time by Dennis Baylor for sin itself as the carrier for calcium (Cone, example, the channelrhodopsin approach recording photocurrents from bovine 1972). Several decades later, we know is used to study the molecular events photoreceptor rods and cones. But Oleg’s that animal-type rhodopsins are G pro- during the induction of synaptic plasticity publication gave no hints about the type tein-coupled receptors indirectly modu- or to map long-range connections from of photoreceptor involved. Kenneth W. lating ion channel activity via signalling one side of the brain to the other, and to Foster however, a physicist at Mount molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetics: Using Light to Control the Brain by Edward S. Boyden, Ph.D
    Optogenetics: Using Light to Control the Brain By Edward S. Boyden, Ph.D. Courtesy of the MIT McGovern Institute, Julie Pryor, Charles Jennings, Sputnik Animation, and Ed Boyden. Editor’s note: The brain is densely packed with interconnected neurons, but until about six years ago, it was difficult for researchers to isolate neurons and neuron types to determine their individual roles in brain processes. In 2004 however, scientists, including author Edward S. Boyden, Ph.D., found that the neural expression of a protein, channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), allowed light to activate or silence brain cells. This technology, now known as optogenetics, is helping scientists determine the functions of specific neurons in the brain, and could play a significant role in treating medical issues as diverse as sleep disorders and vision impairment. Article available online at http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=34614 1 The brain is an incredibly densely wired computational circuit, made out of an enormous number of interconnected cells called neurons, which compute using electrical signals. These neurons are heterogeneous, falling into many different classes that vary in their shapes, molecular compositions, wiring patterns, and the ways in which they change in disease states. It is difficult to analyze how these different classes of neurons work together in the intact brain to mediate the complex computations that support sensations, emotions, decisions, and movements—and how flaws in specific neuron classes result in brain disorders. Ideally, one would study the brain using a technology that would enable the control of the electrical activity of just one type of neuron, embedded within a neural circuit, in order to determine the role that that type of neuron plays in the computations and functions of the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetic Investigation of Neural Circuits in Vivo
    Review Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits in vivo Matthew E. Carter and Luis de Lecea Neurosciences Program and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA The recent development of light-activated optogenetic probes are activated by light (‘opto-’) and are genetically- probes allows for the identification and manipulation of encoded (‘-genetics’), allowing for the direct control specific neural populations and their connections in of specific populations of cells in vitro and in vivo awake animals with unprecedented spatial and temporal (Figure 1) [19–23]. The unprecedented spatial and tempo- precision. This review describes the use of optogenetic ral precision of these tools has allowed substantial progress tools to investigate neurons and neural circuits in vivo. in elucidating the structure and function of previously We describe the current panel of optogenetic probes, intractable neural circuits. methods of targeting these probes to specific cell types This review highlights the use of optogenetic probes to in the nervous system, and strategies of photostimulat- investigate neural circuits in vivo. We survey the diversity of ing cells in awake, behaving animals. Finally, we survey optogenetic tools in behavioral neuroscience, discussing the application of optogenetic tools to studying func- common strategies of cell-type specific targeting and in vivo tional neuroanatomy, behavior and the etiology and light delivery. We also describe common and theoretical treatment of various neurological disorders. methods for investigating neural circuits in awake, behav- ing animals and review some of the optogenetic studies that Optogenetics represent important progress in our understanding of neu- The mammalian brain is composed of billions of neurons ral circuits in normal behavior and disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Han-Optogenetic-Review-ACS-2012.Pdf
    Review pubs.acs.org/chemneuro In Vivo Application of Optogenetics for Neural Circuit Analysis Xue Han Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States ABSTRACT: Optogenetics combines optical and genetic methods to rapidly and reversibly control neural activities or other cellular functions. Using genetic methods, specific cells or anatomical pathways can be sensitized to light through exogenous expression of microbial light activated opsin proteins. Using optical methods, opsin expressing cells can be rapidly and reversibly controlled by pulses of light of specific wavelength. With the high spatial temporal precision, optogenetic tools have enabled new ways to probe the causal role of specific cells in neural computation and behavior. Here, we overview the current state of the technology, and provide a brief introduction to the practical considerations in applying optogenetics in vivo to analyze neural circuit functions. KEYWORDS: Channelrhodopsin, archaerhodopsin, halorhodopsin, cell type specificity ptogenetics is a new field being rapidly established upon algae), and others that mediate a variety of cellular functions O the first demonstration of precise activation of neurons (for reviews on opsin structure and function, see refs 9 and 10). expressing a light-activated microbial opsin, channelrhodopsin- Most sensory rhodopsins function through recruiting intra- 2, with pulses of blue light in 2005.1 Microbial (type I) opsins cellular signaling molecules without direct ion transport are classes of monolithic light activated proteins, encoded by function. However, channelrhodopsins can mediate phototaxis small genes of under a kilobase long. Three major classes of as a light-gated cation channel at high light intensity and as a microbial opsins have been adapted to optogenetically control calcium channel at low light intensity.11 cellular functions, channelrhodopsins, halorhodopsins, and Microbial opsins share sequence homology and are archaerhodopsins (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Perfecting Chr2
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS NEUROSCIENCE Perfecting ChR2 Two new reports describe variants of chan- but in a typical neurobiology experiment nelrhodopsin 2 with improved properties. the channel is thought to transport mostly Channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2) has been a sodium ions. If one were to slightly increase godsend tool to study brain function. This the number of calcium ions transported, protein—originally found in tiny algae— the group reasoned, this could result in is a membrane-ion channel that opens up improvements in the channel’s performance in response to pulses of light, producing a for neuronal activation. change in the membrane potential of charged By modifying one residue in wild-type cells. Algae use ChR2 to signal the presence ChR2, the group generated a mutant with of light and trigger their swimming away or higher calcium permeability, called ‘CatCh’ toward it in the pond; neuroscientists, after (Kleinlogel et al., 2011). In nonneuronal ‘transplanting’ ChR2 into neurons, use it to Image of a neuron expressing the TC mutant, and cells, CatCh’s modest preference for cal- provoke light-triggered action potentials in its spiking trace. Image courtesy of T. Oertner. cium ions elicits approximately three times cells embedded deep in brain tissue. Not sur- higher currents and a slight slowdown of its prisingly, some of ChR2’s natural properties As with previous higher-current ChR2 kinetics compared to wild-type ChR2. But are not exactly ideal for this purpose. mutants, however, the closure of the TC surprisingly, when expressed in neurons, In particular, the channel’s small cur- mutant’s ion channel after a light stimulus is the group saw a nearly 70-fold increase in rents and slow kinetics still limit the poten- slightly slowed down.
    [Show full text]
  • Activation of Distinct Channelrhodopsin Variants Engages Different Patterns of Network Activity
    New Research Sensory and Motor Systems Activation of Distinct Channelrhodopsin Variants Engages Different Patterns of Network Activity Na Young Jun1 and Jessica A. Cardin2,3 https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0222-18.2019 1Department of Ophthalmology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, 2Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, and 3Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 Abstract Several recently developed Channelrhodopsin (ChR) variants are characterized by rapid kinetics and reduced desensitization in comparison to the widely used ChR2. However, little is known about how varying opsin properties may regulate their interaction with local network dynamics. We compared evoked cortical activity in mice expressing three ChR variants with distinct temporal profiles under the CamKII promoter: Chronos, Chrimson, and ChR2. We assessed overall neural activation by measuring the amplitude and temporal progres- sion of evoked spiking. Using ␥-range (30–80 Hz) local field potential (LFP) power as an assay for local network engagement, we examined the recruitment of cortical network activity by each tool. All variants caused light-evoked increases in firing in vivo, but each demonstrated different temporal patterning of evoked activity. In addition, the three ChRs had distinct effects on cortical ␥-band activity. Our findings suggest the properties of optogenetic tools can substantially affect their efficacy in vivo, as well their engagement of circuit resonance. Key words: Channelrhodopsin; Chrimson; Chronos; cortex; ␥ oscillations; optogenetics Significance Statement Genetically modified opsins are some of the most widely used experimental tools in modern neuroscience. However, although these tools are well characterized at the single-cell level, little is known about how the varying properties of the opsins affect their interactions with active neural networks in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Technology Prospects and Investment Opportunities for Scalable Neuroscience
    On the Technology Prospects and Investment Opportunities for Scalable Neuroscience Thomas Dean1,2,3 Biafra Ahanonu3 Mainak Chowdhury3 Anjali Datta3 Andre Esteva3 Daniel Eth3 Nobie Redmon3 Oleg Rumyantsev3 Ysis Tarter3 1 Google Research, 2 Brown University, 3 Stanford University Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 4 3 Evolving Imaging Technologies 6 4 Macroscale Reporting Devices 10 5 Automating Systems Neuroscience 14 6 Synthetic Neurobiology 16 7 Nanotechnology 20 8 Acknowledgements 28 A Leveraging Sequencing for Recording — Biafra Ahanonu 28 B Scalable Analytics and Data Mining — Mainak Chowdhury 32 C Macroscale Imaging Technologies — Anjali Datta 35 D Nanoscale Recording and Wireless Readout — Andre Esteva 38 E Hybrid Biological and Nanotechnology Solutions — Daniel Eth 41 F Advances in Contrast Agents and Tissue Preparation — Nobie Redmon 44 G Microendoscopy and Optically Coupled Implants — Oleg Rumyantsev 46 H Opportunities for Automating Laboratory Procedures — Ysis Tarter 49 i 1 Executive Summary Two major initiatives to accelerate research in the brain sciences have focused attention on devel- oping a new generation of scientific instruments for neuroscience. These instruments will be used to record static (structural) and dynamic (behavioral) information at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution and report out that information in a form suitable for computational analysis. We distinguish between recording — taking measurements of individual cells and the extracellu- lar matrix — and reporting — transcoding, packaging and transmitting the resulting information for subsequent analysis — as these represent very different challenges as we scale the relevant technologies to support simultaneously tracking the many neurons that comprise neural circuits of interest. We investigate a diverse set of technologies with the purpose of anticipating their devel- opment over the span of the next 10 years and categorizing their impact in terms of short-term [1-2 years], medium-term [2-5 years] and longer-term [5-10 years] deliverables.
    [Show full text]
  • Optogenetic Replacement of Odor Stimuli in Drosophila Group Conditioning Experiments
    Optogenetic replacement of Odor stimuli in Drosophila group conditioning experiments Max Planck Institute for Neurobiologie and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨at Munchen¨ Master Thesis for physics by Marc Eppler 6th of December 2016 2 Optogenetic als Ersatz fur¨ Duft bei langzeit-stimulations-konditionierungs- Experimente in Drosophila Max Planck Institute fur¨ Neurobiologie and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨at Munchen¨ Master Arbeit fur¨ Physik von Marc Eppler 6ter Dezember 2016 2 Optogenetic replacement of Odor stimuli in Drosophila group conditioning experiments Developed in the Lab of and supervised by Dr. Ilona Grunwald-Kadow Chemosensory coding and decision-making Marc Christian Eppler Bietigheim-Bissingen 7. November 1988 Handed over at the 6th of December by Marc Eppler Corrector: Prof. Dr. Wilfried Denk 3 Abstract Optogenetics is one of the most powerful recenty discovered tools for the field of Neuroscience and does represent very well the interdisciplinary way modern research is more and more conducted. While replacing traditional way of doing experiments and bringing further possibilities to it, there are also difficulties occurring by the artificial nature of inducing signals into a living model organism. Specially when trying to reconstruct behavior to explore the underlining complexity of the brain it is not trivial to get the the complex circuits within the brain to recognize the stimulus in a way that makes contextual sense and then perform tasks like learning and forming conditioned memories. This work explores a way to have groups of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster being conditioned by imitating an odor stimulus with optogenetics over longer periods of time, which always has been a problem with real odor due to its invisible and hard to control dynamic nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminopsins Integrate Opto- and Chemogenetics by Using Physical and Biological Light Sources for Opsin Activation
    Luminopsins integrate opto- and chemogenetics by using physical and biological light sources for opsin activation Ken Berglunda,b, Kara Clissoldc, Haofang E. Lic, Lei Wend,e, Sung Young Parkd, Jan Gleixnera, Marguerita E. Kleina, Dongye Luc, Joseph W. Barterc, Mark A. Rossic, George J. Augustined,e, Henry H. Yina,c,f,1, and Ute Hochgeschwendera,g,h,1 aDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710; bDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; cDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; dCenter for Functional Connectomics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 39-1 Hawolgokdong, Seongbukgu, Seoul 136-791, Republic of Korea; eLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637553; fCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; gNeuroscience Program, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859; and hCollege of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 Edited by Richard W. Tsien, NYU Neuroscience Institute, New York, NY, and approved December 11, 2015 (received for review June 9, 2015) Luminopsins are fusion proteins of luciferase and opsin that allow peripheral bloodstream, luciferin reaches a target in the brain interrogation of neuronal circuits at different temporal and spatial because it crosses the blood–brain barrier (4). Light is generated by resolutions by choosing either extrinsic physical or intrinsic bi- the luciferase and then activates the opsin, resulting in activation ological light for its activation. Building on previous development (in case of channelrhodopsins) or inhibition (in case of proton or of fusions of wild-type Gaussia luciferase with channelrhodopsin, chloride pumps) of the target neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Coherent Control of Optogenetic Switching by Stimulated Depletion
    Coherent Control of Optogenetic Switching by Stimulated Depletion Quenching Zachary Quine1, Alexei Goun1, Karl Gerhardt, 2, Jeffrey Tabor2, Herschel Rabitz1 1Department of Chemistry, Princeton University 2Department of Bioengineering, Rice University October 29, 2018 Abstract Optogenetics is a revolutionary new field of biotechnology, achieving optical control over biological functions in living cells by genetically inserting light sensitive proteins into cellular signaling pathways. Applications of optogenetic switches are expanding rapidly, but the technique is hampered by spectral cross-talk: the broad absorption spectra of compatible biochemical chromophores limits the number of switches that can be independently controlled and restricts the dynamic range of each switch. In the present work we develop and implement a non-linear optical photoswitching capability, Stimulated Depletion Quenching (SDQ), is used to overcome spectral cross-talk by exploiting the molecules' unique dynamic response to ultrashort laser pulses. SDQ is employed to enhance the control of Cph8, a photo- reversible phytochrome based optogenetic switch designed to control gene expression in E. Coli bacteria. The Cph8 switch can not be fully converted to it's biologically inactive state (PFR) by linear photos- witching, as spectral cross-talk causes a reverse photoswitching reaction to revert to it back to the active state (PR). SDQ selectively halts this reverse reaction while allowing the forward reaction to proceed. arXiv:1810.11432v1 [q-bio.QM] 26 Oct 2018 The
    [Show full text]