Arxiv:0911.1384V1 [Cond-Mat.Soft] 7 Nov 2009 Ats Rnlrmdaadgasscan Glasses Suspensions, and Colloidal Media Emulsions, Granular Pastes, Foams, Matter

arXiv:0911.1384v1 [cond-mat.soft] 7 Nov 2009 ats rnlrmdaadgasscan glasses suspensions, and colloidal media emulsions, granular pastes, Foams, matter. dered rssi wal)cmrse ytm fsf particles soft of systems which compressed scenarios, (weakly) jamming basic in the arises on focuses paper the jamming. to distance the systems the of these review function of a and properties as — mechanical rather glasses and non- media molecular geometrical for and granular models colloidal and — than foams shear zero the emulsions, of and brownian nature temperature systems the model zero jammed is at on What focus We the state? transition? is jamming jammed What the questions: of two following nature the to answers tial) connections the [1]. probe rigidity to to dia- transitions proposed and various phase and between Liu 1e), jamming 1998 (Fig. be- provocative In gram lowered their is temperature. presented transition temperature Nagel glass the the as low glasses supercooled shear and random form the stress, yield near liquids as the static below increased decreased become is is col- stress foams density flowing become packing, the suspensions close as colloidal ap- glasses sample: stress loidal the the as to den- such variables plied or mechanical temperature also but as varyingsity, by such induced variables, be can thermodynamic transition, jamming the state, and (unjam) yield parameters. How- to control made various 1a-d). tuning be by (Fig. easily flow also stresses elasti- can shear they essentially applied ever, respond small they to which cally in states ordered amn oen h rniint iiiyo disor- of rigidity to transition the governs Jamming nve ftevr ai eeomnsi h field, the in developments rapid very the of view In (par- current the of overview an provides review This jammed the to flowing freely the from transition The amn fSf atce:Goer,Mcais cln an Scaling Mechanics, Geometry, Particles: Soft of Jamming ASnmes 14.j 47.- 38.g 38.j 83. 83.80.Hj, 83.80.Fg, 64.70.D-, 61.43.-j, numbers: PACS whi isostaticity, th to is jamming. distance emerges to with distance that scale allow picture and This The number contact directions. isostaticity. to opposite distance in and but limit, j tu asphericity isostatic of and the explorations friction margin current Both p discuss are mechanical particles. we (ellipsoidal) and systems Finally geometric these point. many extensiv point, jamming and then jamming counting, We the constraint b At of the jamming. discuss near spheres. first mechanics We soft rich stress. the through shear jam act underlies zero to that and particles transition temperature of the zero packings of disordered understanding for current state the review we can mrhu aeil sdvrea om,eusos colloi emulsions, foams, as diverse as materials Amorphous .INTRODUCTION I. jam noargd iodrdsaeweete ihtn nt sh finite withstand they where state disordered rigid, a into jam 30R edn h Netherlands. The Leiden, RA 2300 ednUiest,P o 9504, box PO University, Leiden aelnhOnsLaboratory, Onnes Kamerlingh nrgd dis- rigid, in [email protected] a Hecke van M ytm.Teei iia au of value minimal a these for is role crucial There a plays particle, systems. per contacts of ber eprtr 1,1]adeprmns[2 3 14]. finite 13, at [12, systems experiments of and jamming 9], 11] 8, [10, media 7, temperature disordered 6, of of [5, flow range [3], jamming the near systems wider [4], attractive a jamming in below on systems occurring work as for such point phenomena, addition, starting in and, a article provides overview sufficiently emerged an is has warrant systems to that these complete in picture transition The jamming the shear. for tem- zero zero and at forces perature contact repulsive through interacting air hr emtyadmcaia epneaein- are response be- linked. mechanical tricately beautiful and and geometry these rich where see, havior, exhibit will we systems As simple zero. seemingly when reaches equivalently, rigid- pressure or lose confining vanish, pressure systems the deformations These applied the when the fraction. par- ity by the packing controlled of enforced be deformation or of can these amount which all the ticles, of by jamming set to is distance systems The repul- forces. through contact interact sive ellipsoids which particles frictionless (deformable) and soft spheres, frictional spheres, als rcs au o h iiu au of value es- minimum can the one elastic for value argument cost precise counting not a constraint do tablish a order) By lowest is (in so-calle energy. number motions, that contact particle modes, the collective floppy are when there small, rigidity: too loses system the in hsi h ssai otc number contact deforma- isostatic floppy the is allows this generically — not tions does system the fjme ytm cl ihdsac oteisostatic the to distance with properties scale point. geometrical systems and mechanical jammed of of host a see, will 80.Iz etecnatnme tjmigaa from away jamming at number contact the ne h otc number, contact The frictionless of jamming on is focus the review this In n odsnagedsac ojamming to distance disentangle to one s eusv otc neatosadaeat are and interactions contact repulsive etecnatnme tefsae with scales itself number contact the le tms uniisaegvre ythe by governed are quantities most at migo rcinladnon-spherical and frictional of amming igadtentr ftejammed the of nature the and ming a upnin n rnlrmedia granular and suspensions dal ekono ffieasmtosthat assumptions affine of reakdown oete cl ihdsac othis to distance with scale roperties l ics amn ffrictionless of jamming discuss ely lysal iottc ntesense the in (isostatic) stable ally a tessbfr ilig Here yielding. before stresses ear z enda h vrg num- average the as defined , Isostaticity d z eo which below z iso swe As . z where — d 2

FIG. 1: (a-d) Examples of everyday disordered media in a jammed state. (a) Granular media, consisting of solid grains in gas or vacuum. (b) Toothpaste, a dense packing of (colloidal) particles in fluid. (c) Mayonnaise, an emulsion consisting of a dense packing of (oil) droplets in an immiscible fluid. (d) Shaving foam, a dense packing of gas bubbles in fluid. (e) Jamming diagram proposed by Liu, Nagel and co-workers [1, 2]. The diagram illustrates that many disordered materials are in a jammed state for low temperature, low load and large density, but can yield and become unjammed when these parameters are varied. In this review we will focus on the zero temperature, zero load axis. For frictionless soft spheres, there is a well defined jamming transition indicated by point “J” on the inverse density axis, which exhibits similarities to an (unusual) critical phase transition.

The crucial, and at ﬁrst glance very puzzling point, is assumes that local deformations and forces scale sim- that while frictionless spheres reach isostaticity at the ilarly as global deformations and stresses. As we will jamming point, frictional spheres are generally hyper- see in section IIA, major discrepancies arise when these static (z>ziso) at jamming, while frictionless ellipsoids approaches are confronted with (numerical) experiments are hypostatic (z

FIG. 3: Square root scaling of contact number z with φ φc observed in the Durian bubble model (adapted from [25]− — Copyright by the American Physical Society).

FIG. 4: Deformation fields of packings of 1000 frictionless par- random close packing density in two dimensions — here ticles under compression (a,c) and shear (b,d) as indicated by the yield stress appears to vanish smoothly. (ii) The the red arrows. The packings in the top row (a,b) are strongly contact number z smoothly decreases with φ. At φ = 1 jammed (contact number z = 5.87), while the packings in the bottom row (c,d) are close to the jamming point — their con- the contact number equals six. This can be understood tact number is 4.09, while the jamming transition occurs for by combining Euler’s theorem which relates the number z = 4 in this case. Clearly, the deformation field becomes in- of vertices, faces and edges in tilings with Plateau’s rule creasingly non-affine when the jamming point is approached that for a two-dimensional dry foam in equilibrium, three (adapted from [30, 31] — Copyright by the American Physical films (faces) meet in one point (vertex). When φ φc, Society). the contact number appears to reach the marginal→ value, four. (iii) The shear modulus decreases with φ and appears to smoothly go to zero at φ = φc (unfortunately There is thus a wealth of simulational and experimen- the authors do not comment on the bulk modulus). tal evidence that invalidates simple predictions for the In related work on the so-called bubble model de- rigidity of disordered media based on our intuition for veloped for wet foams in 1995, Durian reached similar ordered packings. The crucial ingredient that is missing conclusions for two-dimensional model foams, and more- is the non-affine nature of the deformations of disordered over found that the contact number indeed approaches packings (Fig. 4). There is no simple way to estimate the 4(= 2d) near jamming, and observed the non-trivial particles motion and deformations in disordered systems, square root scaling of z 4 with excess density for the and one needs to resort to (numerical) experiments. Jam- first time (Fig 3). All these− findings are consistent with ming can be seen as the avenue that connects the results what is found in closely related models of frictionless soft of such experiments. Jamming aims at capturing the me- spheres near jamming, as discussed in sections III. chanical and geometric properties of disordered systems, Experimentally, measurements of the shear modulus building on two insights: first, that the non-affine char- and osmotic pressure of compressed three-dimensional acter becomes large near the jamming transition, and monodisperse but disordered emulsions found similar be- second, that disorder and non-affinity are not weak per- havior for the loss of rigidity [27, 28, 29]. The shear turbations away from the ordered, affine case, but may modulus, (when scaled appropriately with the Laplace lead to completely new physics [24, 27, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. pressure, which sets the local “stiffness” of the droplets) grows continuously with φ and vanishes at φc 0.635, corresponding to random close packing in three≈ dimen- III. JAMMING OF SOFT FRICTIONLESS sions. The osmotic pressure exhibits very similar scaling, SPHERES implying that the bulk modulus (being proportional to the derivative of the pressure with respect to φ) scales Over the last decade, tremendous progress has been differently from the shear modulus — the difference be- made in our understanding of what might be considered tween shear and bulk modulus is another hallmark of the “Ising model” for jamming: static packings of soft, jamming of frictionless spheres. frictionless spheres that act through purely repulsive con- 5

In section IIIC we discuss the special geometrical features of systems at point J, as probed by the contact number and pair correlation function. Away from point J the contact number exhibits non-trivial scaling, which appears to be closely related to the pair correlation function at point J, as discussed in section IIID. Many features of systems near point J can be probed in linear response, and these are discussed at length in section IIIE — these include the density of states (III E 1), diverging length and time scales (III E 2), elastic moduli (III E 3) and non-affine displacements (III E 4). We close this sec- FIG. 5: States of soft frictionless spheres as function of pack- tion by a comparison of effective medium theory, rigidity ing density φ, below, at, and above the critical density φc. percolation and jamming, highlighting the unique nature Left: Unjammed system at a density below the critical den- of jamming near point J (III E 5). sity — pressure is zero and there are no contacts. Middle: Marginally rigid system consisting of undeformed frictionless spheres just touching. The system is at the jamming tran- A. Definition of the Model sition (point J), has vanishing pressure, critical density and 2d contacts per particle, where d is the dimension. Right: Jammed system for finite pressure and density above φc. At the (un)jamming transition soft particles are undeformed, and the distance to jamming depends on the amount of deformation. Rigid particles are therefore al- tact forces. In this model, temperature, gravity and shear ways at the jamming transition, and soft particles are are set to zero. The beauty of such systems is that they necessary to vary the distance to point J. Deformable fric- allow for a precise study of a jamming transition. As we tionless spheres interact through purely repulsive body will see in sections IV and V, caution should be applied centered forces, which can be written as a function of when applying the results for soft frictionless spheres to the amount of virtual overlap between two particles in frictional and/or non-spherical particles. contact. Denoting the radii of particles in contact as Ri From a theoretical point of view, packings of soft fric- and Rj and the center-to-center distance as rij , it is con- tionless spheres are ideal for three reasons. First, they venient to define a dimensionless overlap parameter δij exhibit a well defined jamming point: For positive P the as system is jammed, as it exhibits a finite shear modulus rij δij := 1 , (1) and a finite yield stress [2], while at zero pressure the sys- − Ri + Rj tems loses rigidity. Hence, the (un)jamming transition occurs when the pressure P approaches zero, or, geomet- so that particles are in contact only if δij 0. We limit rically, when the deformations of the particles vanish. ourselves here to interaction potentials of the≥ form: The zero pressure, zero shear, zero temperature point in α the jamming phase diagram is referred to as “point J” Vij = ǫij δ δij 0 , (2) ij ≥ (Fig. 1e and 5). In this review, point J will only refer Vij =0 δij 0 . (3) to soft frictionless spheres and not to jamming transi- ≤ tions of other types of particles. Second, at point J the By varying the exponent, α, one can probe the nature and contact number approaches the so-called isostatic value, robustness of the various scaling laws discussed below. and the system is marginally stable. The system’s me- For harmonic interactions, α = 2 and ǫij sets the spring chanical and geometrical properties are rich and peculiar constant of the contacts. Hertzian interactions between here. For large systems the critical packing density, φc, three-dimensional spheres, where contacts are stiffer as approaches values usually associated with random close they are more compressed, correspond to α = 5/2 [91]. packing. Third, the mechanical and geometrical proper- O’Hern et al have also studied the “Hernian” interaction ties of jammed systems at finite pressure, or equivalently, (α = 3/2), which corresponds to contacts that become φ φc > 0, exhibit non-trivial power law scalings as a progressively weaker when compressed [2]. − function ∆φ := φ φc or, similarly, as function of the Once the contact laws are given, one can generate pack- − pressure, P . ings by various different protocols, of which MD (Molec- In this section we address the special nature of point J ular Dynamics) [20, 21, 22, 24] and conjugate gradient [2] and discuss the scaling of the mechanical and geometrical are the most commonly used [92]. In MD simulations one properties for jammed systems near point J. We start in typically starts simulations with a loose gas of particles, section IIIA by a brief discussion of a few common con- which are incrementally compressed, either by shrinking tact laws and various numerical protocols used to gener- their container or by inflating their radii. Supplement- ate jammed packings. We then present evidence that the ing the contact laws with dissipation (inelastic collisions, jamming transition of frictionless spheres is sharp and viscous drag with a virtual background fluid, etc) the discuss the relevant control parameters in section III B. systems “cools” and eventually one obtains a stationary 6 jammed state. While straightforward, one might worry versial [41]. that statistical properties of packings obtained by such Control Parameters — As we will see, the properties procedure depend on aspects of the procedure itself — of packings of soft slippery balls are controlled by their for frictional packings, this is certainly the case [37]. distance to point J. What is a good control parameter For frictionless particles, the interactions are conser- for jamming at point J? The spread in critical density vative, and one can exploit the fact that stable packings for finite systems indicates that one should not use the correspond to minima of the elastic energy. Packings density, but only the excess density ∆φ := φ φc as can then be created by starting from a completely ran- control parameter. In other words, fixing the volume− is dom configuration and then bringing the system to the not the same as fixing the pressure for finite systems. nearest minimum of the potential energy. When the en- The disadvantage of using the excess density is that ergy at this minimum is finite, the packing is at finite it requires deflating packings to first obtain φc [2]. This pressure, and this procedure is purported to sample the extra step is not necessary when P is used as control phase space of allowed packings flatly [2, 38]. An ef- parameter, since the jamming point corresponds to P =0 fective algorithm to find such minima is known as the — no matter what the system size or φc is of a given “conjugate gradient technique” [39]. For frictionless sys- system. While we believe it is much simpler to deal with tems, we are not aware of significant differences between fixed pressure than with fixed volume, a disadvantage of packings obtained by MD and by this method [93]. P is that its relation to ∆φ is interaction dependent: the Finally it should be noted that to avoid crystallization, use of the excess density stresses the geometric nature of two-dimensional packings are usually made polydisperse, the jamming transition at point J. and a popular choice are bidisperse packings where parti- We suggest that the average overlap δ is the simplest cles of radii 1 and 1.4 are mixed in equal amounts [2, 30]. control parameter — even though its use is not common. In three dimensions, this is not necessary as monodis- First, δ is geometric and interaction independent and perse spheres then do not appear to order or crystal- reaches zero at jamming, also for finite systems. More- lize for typically employed numerical packing generation over, for finite systems δ still controls the pressure and techniques. will be very close to ∆φ. Of course, in infinite systems, control parameters like the pressure P , the average particle overlap δ and the density φ are directly linked — for α 1 α 1 B. Evidence for Sharp Transition interactions of the form Eq. (2), P δ − (∆φ) − . Below, we will use a combination of∼ all these∼ control pa- The seminal work of O’Hern et al. [2, 40] has laid the rameters, reflecting the different choices currently made groundwork for much of what we understand about jam- in the field. ming of frictionless soft spheres. These authors begin by carefully establishing that frictionless soft spheres exhibit a sharp jamming transition. First, it was found C. Geometry at Point J that when a jammed packing is decompressed, the pressure, the bulk modulus and the shear modulus vanish At point J, the system’s packing geometry is highly at the same critical density φc. For finite systems, the non-trivial. First, systems at point J are isostatic [43]: value of φc varies from system to system. For systems of the average number of contacts per particle is sharply 1000 particles the width of the distribution of φc, W , still defined and equals the minimum required for stability corresponds to 0.4%, and must therefore not be ignored. [2, 44, 45]. Second, near jamming g(r) diverges when Second, it was shown that the width, W , vanishes with r 1 (for particles of radius 1) [42, 46, 47]. 1/2 ↓ the number of particles N as W N − — independent Isostaticity — The fact that the contact number at of dimension, interaction potential∼ or polydispersity. In point J attains a sharply defined value has been argued to addition, the location of the peak of the distribution of follow directly from counting the degrees of freedom and 1/νd φ , φ0, also scales with N: φ0 φ∗ = (0.12 0.03)N − . constraints [44, 45]. We discuss such counting arguments c − ± Here d is the dimensionality, ν = 0.71 0.08 and φ∗ in detail in Appendix A, but give here the gist of the approaches 0.639 0.001 for three-dimensional± monodis- argument for frictionless spheres. perse systems. ± Suppose we have a packing of N soft spheres in d These various scaling laws suggest that for friction- dimensions, and that the contact number, the average less spheres the jamming transition is sharp in the limit number of contacts at a particle, equals z — the to- of large systems. This jamming point is referred to as tal number of contacts equals zN/2, since each contact point J (see Fig. 1e and 5). At the jamming point, the is shared by two particles. First, the resulting packing packings consist of perfectly spherical (i.e., undeformed) should not have any floppy modes, deformation modes spheres which just touch (Fig. 5). The packing fraction that cost zero energy in lowest order. As we discuss in for large systems, φ∗, reaches values which have been Appendix A, this is equivalent to requiring that the Nz/2 associated with random close packing (RCP) [2, 15] — contact forces balance on all grains, which yields dN con- ( 0.84 in two dimensions, 0.64 in three dimensions). straints on Nz/2 force degrees of freedom: hence z 2d. It∼ should be noted that the RCP∼ concept itself is contro- The minimum value of z required is referred to as≥ the 7

FIG. 7: (a) Excess contact number z zc as function of ex- − cess density φ φc. Upper curves: represent monodisperse and bidisperse− packings of 512 soft spheres in three dimensions with various interaction potentials, while lower curves correspond to bidisperse packings of 1024 soft discs in two FIG. 6: The pair correlation function g(r > 1) of a three- dimensions. The straight lines have slope 0.5. From [2] — dimensional system of monodisperse spheres of radius 1, il- Copyright by the American Physical Society. (b) Schematic lustrates the abundance of near contacts close to jamming −8 contact number as function of density, illustrating the mixed (∆φ = 10 here). From [42] — Copyright by the American nature of the jamming transition for frictionless soft spheres. Physical Society.

isostatic value ziso: for frictionless spheres, ziso =2d. of particles are on the verge of making contact (Fig. 6) Second, at point J, since the particles are undeformed: [42, 46]. This divergence has also been seen in pure hard the distance between contacting particles has to be pre- sphere packings [47]. In addition to this divergence, g(r) cisely equal to the sum of their radii. This yields Nz/2 exhibits a delta peak at r = 1 corresponding to the dN/2 constraints for the dN positional degrees of freedom: contacting pairs of particles. therefore, one only expects generic solutions at jamming In simulations of two-dimensional bidisperse systems, a when z 2d. similar divergence can be observed, provided one studies Combining≤ these two inequalities then yields that the g(ξ), where the rescaled interparticle distance ξ is defined contact number zc at the jamming point for soft fric- as r/(Ri + Rj), and where Ri and Rj are the radii of the tionless disks generically will attain the isostatic value: undeformed particles in contact [51]. zc = ziso = 2d [2, 44, 45]. As we will see below, such counting arguments should be regarded with caution, since they do not provide a correct estimate for the contact number at jamming of frictionless ellipsoidal parti- D. Relating Contact Numbers and Packing cles [48, 49, 50]. Densities away from J Numerically, it is far from trivial to obtain convincing evidence for the approach of the contact number to the Below jamming, there are no load bearing contacts and isostatic value. Apart from corrections due to finite sys- the contact number is zero, while at point J, the contact tem sizes and finite pressures, a subtle issue is how to number attains the value 2d. How does the contact num- deal with rattlers, particles that do not have any con- ber grow for systems at finite pressure? Assuming that tacts with substantial forces, but still arise in a typical (i) compression of packings near point J leads to essen- simulation. These particles have low coordination num- tially affine deformations, and that (ii) g(r) is regular ber and their overlap with other particles is set by the for r > 1, z would be expected to grow linearly with φ: numerical precision — these particles do not contribute compression by 1% would then bring particles that are to rigidity. For low pressures, they can easily make up separated by less than 1% of their diameter in contact, 5% of the particles. An accurate estimate of the contact etc. But we have seen above that g(r) is not regular, and number than requires one to ignore these particles and we will show below that deformations are very far from the corresponding “numerical” contacts [2, 70]. affine near jamming — so how does z grow with φ? Pair Correlation Function — In simulations of monodisperse spheres in three dimensions, it was found Many authors have found that the contact number grows with the square root of the excess density ∆φ := that near jamming g(r) diverges when r 1 (for particles of radius 1): ↓ φ φc [2, 15, 20, 25] (see Fig. 7). O’Hern et al. have studied− this scaling in detail, and find that the excess contact 0.50 0.03 1 number ∆z := z zc scales as ∆z (∆φ) ± , where g(r) . (4) − ∼ ∼ √r 1 zc, the critical contact number, is within error bars equal − to the isostatic value 2d [2]. Note that this result is in- This expresses that at jamming a singularly large number dependent of dimension, interaction potential or polydis- 8 persity (see Fig. 7a). Hence, the crucial scaling law is

∆z = z0 ∆φ , (5) p where the precise value of the prefactor z0 depends on dimension, and possibly weakly on the degree of polydispersity, and is similar to 3.5 0.3 in two dimensions and 7.9 0.5 in three dimensions± [2]. The± variation of the contact number near J can therefore be perceived to be of mixed first/second order character: below jamming z = 0, at J the contact number z jumps discontinuously from zero to 2d, and for jammed systems the contact number exhibits non-trivial power law scaling as a function of increasing density (Fig. 3 and 7). We will see below that many other scaling relations FIG. 8: Definition of relative displacement uij , u and u⊥. (for elastic moduli, for the density of state and for characteristic scales) are intimately related to the scaling of z, and the contact number scaling can be seen as the cen- at all densities, and then arguing that the divergence tral non-trivial scaling in this system. (In frictional and in g(r) is a necessary consequence of that [54]. Both non spherical packings, similar scalings for z are found.) his arguments require assumptions which are not self- A subtle point is that the clean scaling laws for ∆z vs evident, though [52]. ∆φ are only obtained if one excludes the rattlers when counting contacts, but includes them for the packing fraction [2]. Moreover, for individual packings the scatter in E. Linear Response and Dynamical Matrix contact numbers at given pressure is quite substantial — see for example Fig. 9 from [52] — and smooth curves such as shown in Fig. 7a can only obtained by averag- A major consequence of isostaticity at point J is that ing over many packings. Finally, the density φ is usually packings of soft frictionless spheres exhibit increasingly defined by dividing the volume of the undeformed parti- anomalous behavior as the jamming transition is ap- cles by the box size, and packing fractions larger than 1 proached. That anomalies occur near jamming is ulti- are perfectly reasonable. Hence, in comparison to pack- mately a consequence of the fact that the mechanical re- ing fractions defined by dividing the volume of the de- sponse of an isostatic system cannot be described by elas- formed particles by the box size, φ is larger because the ticity — isostatic systems are essentially different from overlap is essentially counted double. Even though none ordinary elastic systems [45, 55]. of these subtleties should play a role for the asymptotic In principle these anomalies can be studied at the jam- scaling close to jamming in large enough systems, they ming point, however, much insight can be gained by ex- are crucial when comparing to experiments and also for ploring the mechanical properties as a function of dis- numerical simulations. tance to the isostatic point. Below we review a number of such non-trivial behaviors and scaling laws that arise near point J. We will focus on the response to weak quasistatic 1. Connections between contact number scaling, g(r) and perturbations, and on the vibrational eigenfrequencies marginal stability and eigenmodes of weakly jammed systems. Both are governed by the dynamical matrix of the jammed pack- The scaling of ∆z can be related to the divergence of ing under consideration. the radial distribution function as follows [56]. Imagine For linear deformations, the changes in elastic energy compressing the packing, starting from the critical state can be expressed in the relative displacement uij of neigh- at point J, and increasing the typical particle overlap boring particles i and j. It is convenient to decompose from zero to δ. If one assumes that this compression uij in components parallel (u ) and perpendicular (u ) ⊥ is essentially affine, then it is reasonable to expect that to rij , where rij connects the centers of particles i and such compression closes all gaps between particles that j (Fig. 8). In these terms the change in energy takes a are smaller than δ. Hence simple form [31, 43, 54], 1+δ 1 ∆z dξ √δ . (6) 1 2 fij 2 ∼ Z √ξ 1 ∼ ∆E = kij u ,ij u ,ij , (7) 1 2 || − k r ⊥ − Xi,j ij ij Wyart approaches the square root scaling of ∆z from a different angle, by first showing that the scaling ∆z √δ where fij and kij denote the contact forces and stiff- is consistent with the system staying marginally stable∼ nesses. For power law interactions of the form given in 9

The most striking features of the density of states are illustrated in Fig. 9. First, far above jamming, the DOS for small frequencies is regular (black curve). Second, approaching point J, the density of vibrational states DOS at low frequencies is strongly enhanced. (In analogy to what is observed in glasses, this is sometimes referred to as the boson peak, since the ratio of the observed DOS and the Debye prediction exhibits a peak at low ω). More precisely, the DOS becomes essentially constant up to some low-frequency crossover scale at ω = ω∗, be- d 1 low which the continuum scaling w − is recovered. ∼ Third, the characteristic frequency ω∗ vanishes at point J as ω∗ ∆z. FIG. 9: Density of vibrational states D(ω) for 1024 spheres ∼ interacting with repulsive harmonic potentials. Distance to The density of states thus convincingly shows that, jamming ∆φ equals 0.1 (black), 10−2 (blue), 10−3 (green), close to the isostatic point / jamming point, the material 10−4 (red) and 10−8 (black). The inset shows that the char- is anomalous in that it exhibits an excess of low frequency acteristic frequency ω∗, defined as where D(ω) is half of the modes, and that at point J, the material does not ap- plateau value, scales linearly with ∆z. The line has slope pear to exhibit any ordinary Debye/continuum behavior 1. Adapted from [54, 56] — Copyright by the Institute of as here the DOS becomes flat. Jamming of frictionless Physics spheres thus describes truly new physics. Normal Modes — The nature of the vibrational modes Eq. (2), we can rewrite this as [30]: changes strongly with frequency, and, to a lesser extend, with distance to point J. Various order parameters can 1 2 δij 2 be used to characterize these modes, such as the (inverse) ∆E = kij u ,ij u ,ij . (8) 2 || − α 1 ⊥ participation ratio, level repulsion and localization length Xi,j − [58, 59]. The participation ratio for a given mode is de- 2 2 4 The dynamical matrix ij,αβ is obtained by rewriting fined as = (1/N) (Σ u ) /Σ u , where u is the M P i| i| i| i| i eq. (7) in terms of the independent variables, ui,n, as polarization vector of particle i [58]. It characterizes how 1 evenly the particles participate in a certain vibrational ∆E = ij,nm ui,n uj,m . (9) mode — extended modes have of order one, while lo- 2M calized modes have smaller , withP hypothetical modes Here is a dN dN matrix with N the number of where only one particle participatesP reaching =1/N. M × P particles, indices n,m label the coordinate axes, and the Studies of such order parameters have not found very summation convention is used. sharp changes in the nature of the modes either with The dynamical matrix contains all information on the distance to jamming or with eigenfrequency [58, 59, 60]. elastic properties of the system. By diagonalizing the It appears to be more appropriate to think in terms of dynamical matrix one can probe the vibrational proper- typical modes and crossovers. Qualitatively, one can con- ties of systems near jamming [2, 33, 54, 56] (see section sider the DOS to consist of roughly three bands: a low III E 1). The dynamical matrix also governs the elastic d 1 ext frequency band where D(ω) ω − , a middle frequency response of the system to external forces f (see sec- band where D(ω) is approximately∼ flat, and a high fre- tions IIIE2-IIIE4 ) [30, 57]: quency band where D(ω) decreases with ω [58]. ext ij,nm uj,m = fi,n . (10) Representative examples of modes in these three bands M are shown in Fig. 10. The modes in the low frequency band come in two flavors: plane wave like with 1, 1. Density of States and quasi localized with small [59, 60]. The modesP ∼ in the large frequency band are essentiallyP localized with Studies of the vibrational modes, and the associated small . The vast majority of the modes are in the P density of (vibrational) states (DOS) have played a key mid frequency band (especially close to jamming), and role in identifying anomalous behavior near point J. Low are extended but not simple plain waves — typically the frequency vibrations in ordinary crystalline or amorphous eigenvectors have a swirly appearance. matter are long-wavelength plane waves. Counting the The localization length ξ of these modes has been es- number of these, one finds that the density of vibrational timated to be large, so that many modes have ξ com- d 1 states D(ω) is expected to scale as D(ω) ω − for low parable or larger than the system size. Consistent with frequencies — this is called Debye behavior.∼ Jammed this, the modes in the low and mid frequency range are packings of frictionless spheres do show Debye-like be- mostly extended, ξ>L, and exhibit level repulsion (i.e., havior far away from jamming, but as the point J is ap- the level spacing statistics P (∆ω) follows the so-called proached, both the structure of the modes and the den- Wigner surmise of random matrix theory), while the high sity of states exhibit surprising features [2, 54, 56, 58]. frequency modes are localized (ξ

FIG. 10: Representative eigenmodes for a two-dimensional system of 104 particles interacting with three-dimensional Hertzian interactions (α = 5/2, see Eq. 2) at a pressure far away from jamming (z 5.09). For all modes, the length of the vectors ui 2 ≈ ∝ are normalized such that σi ui is a constant. (a) Continuum-like low frequency mode at ω 0.030, 0.79, and iω = 3, | | ≈ P ≈ where iω counts the non trivial modes, ordered by frequency. (b) Quasi-localized low frequency mode at ω 0.040, 0.06, ≈ P ≈ and iω = 7. (c) Disordered, “swirly” mid frequency mode at ω 0.39, 0.31, and iω = 1000. (d) Localized high frequency ≈ P ≈ mode at ω 4.00, 0.0013, and iω = 9970. ≈ P ≈ sonian level statistics [59]. When point J is approached, the main change is that the low frequency, “Debye” range shrinks, and that both the number of plane waves and of quasi-localized reso- nances diminishes [58, 59, 60].

2. Characteristic Length and Time Scales

The vanishing of the characteristic frequency ω∗ at point J suggests to search for a diverging length scale. Below we give an analytical estimate for this length scale and discuss indirect and direct observations of this length scale in simulations. Estimate of l∗ — As pointed out by Wyart et al. [54], if we cut a circular blob of radius ℓ from a rigid material, it should remain rigid. The rigidity (given by the shear modulus) of jammed materials is proportional to ∆z. The circular blob has of the order ℓd∆z excess contacts. By cutting it out, one breaks the contacts at the FIG. 11: Divergence of a characteristic length scale near jam- d 1 perimeter, of which there are of order zℓ − . If the num- ming as observed in the fluctuations of the changes of contact ber of broken contacts at the edge is larger than the num- forces of a system of 104 Hertzian discs. Blue (red) bonds cor- ber of excess contacts in the bulk, the resulting blob is respond to increased (decreased) force in response to pushing not rigid, but floppy: it can be deformed without energy a single particle in the center of the packing to the right. In cost (in lowest order). The smallest blob one can cut out panel (a), the system is far from jamming and z = 5.55, while in panel (b), the system is close to jamming and z = 4.05 without it being floppy is obtained when these numbers (adapted from [31]). are equal, which implies that it has radius ℓ∗ z/∆z. Close to the jamming transition, z is essentially constant,∼ and so one obtains as scaling relation that [54] ω∗, λT has been observed by Silbert et al. [56]. Notice, 1 however, that the scaling of λ is different from the scal- ℓ∗ . (11) T ∼ ∆z ing of l∗ — it is λL that coincides with the length scale Observation of l∗ in Vibration Modes — Using the ℓ∗ derived above. speed of sound one can translate the crossover frequency Observation of l∗ in Point Response — The signature ω∗ into a wavelength, which scales as λT 1/√∆z for of the length scale ℓ∗ can be observed directly in the point ∼ transverse (shear) waves and as λL 1/∆z for longitudi- force response networks : Close to point J, i.e. for small nal (compressional) waves — the difference∼ in scaling is ∆z, the scale up to which the response looks disordered due to the difference in scaling of shear and bulk moduli becomes large (see Fig. 11) [30, 31]. By studying the (see section III E 3 below). By examining the spatial vari- radial decay of fluctuations in the response to an inflation ation of the eigenmode corresponding to the frequency of a single central particle (which is more symmetric than 11

particles i and j via the Irving-Kirkwood equation: 1 Σ = Σ f r , (12) αβ 2V ij ij,α ij,β

where σab is the stress tensor, α and β label coordinates, and V is the volume. Once we know the local motion of the particles in response to an externally applied deformation, we can cal- culate the contact forces from the force law and obtain thus the stress in response to deformation. Let us first estimate the scaling of the moduli from the affine predic- FIG. 12: Bulk (K) and shear (G) modulus as function of tion where one assumes that the typical particle overlap distance to jamming for two-dimensional bidisperse systems, δ is proportional to ∆φ and that all bonds contribute with interaction potential V δα (see Eqs. 2). The closed similarly to the increase in elastic energy when the pack- symbols denote moduli calculated∼ by forcing the particles to ing is deformed. For a deformation strain ε we can esti- move affinely, and the open symbols correspond to the moduli mate the corresponding increase in energy from Eq. (8) calculated after the system has relaxed. Slopes as indicated as ∆E Σkε2. Therefore, under affine deformations, the (adapted from [2] — Copyright by the American Physical corresponding∼ elastic modulus is of order k — in other Society). words, the elastic moduli simply follow from the typical stiffnesses of the contacts. Consider now deforming a disordered jammed pack- that of point forcing as shown in Fig. 11) as a function ing. All particles feel a local disordered environment, of distance to jamming, one obtains a crossover length l∗ and deformations will not be affine (Fig. 4). The point is which, as the theoretically derived length scale, varies as that these non-affine motions become increasingly strong l∗ 6/∆z [31]. near the jamming transition, and qualitatively change ≈ Characteristic Length and Validity of Elasticity — An the scaling behavior of, e.g., the shear modulus of foams important issue, which has in particular been studied ex- and granular media [2, 15, 20, 43, 62]. tensively in the context of granular media, is whether A particularly enlightening manner to illustrate the elasticity can describe a systems response to, for example, role of non-affine deformations is to initially force the point forcing [55, 61]. Extensive observations of the linear particle displacements to be affine, and then let them relax. In general, the system can lower its elastic energy response, connected to the direct observation of l∗, suggest that there is a simple answer, and that the distance by additional non-affine motions. Calculating the elas- to the isostatic limit is crucial [30, 31]: Below a length tic energies of enforced affine deformations and of the subsequent relaxed packings of soft frictionless spheres, scale l∗ the response is dominated by fluctuations, and the deformation field can be seen as a distorted floppy O’Hern and co-workers found that the non-affine relax- mode, while at larger length scales the systems response ation lowers both the shear and bulk modulus, but cru- crosses over to elasticity. This is for a single realization cially changes the scaling of the shear modulus with dis- — it can also be shown that, even close to jamming, the tance to jamming [2] — see Fig. 12. In general, one finds that for power law interactions ensemble averaged response of a weakly jammed system α 1 (Eq. 2), the pressure scales as ∆φ − and the contact is consistent with elasticity, provided the correct values α 2 of the elastic moduli are chosen — these moduli are con- stifness k and bulk modulus K scale as ∆φ − [2, 30, 62]. sistent with the globally defined ones [31]. The surprise is that the shear modulus G gets progressively smaller than the bulk modulus near point J, and G scales differently from K with distance to jamming: α 3/2 G ∆φ − (See Fig. 12) [2, 20, 30, 62]. The relations between∼ the scaling of G, K and k can be rewritten as 3. Scaling of Shear and Bulk Moduli G ∆zK ∆z k . (13) ∼ ∼ The scaling of the shear modulus, G, and bulk modu- It is worth noting that many soft matter systems (pastes, lus, K, plays a central role in connecting the non-affine, emulsions) have shear moduli which are much smaller disordered nature of the response to the anomalous elas- than compressional moduli — from an application point tic properties of systems near jamming. To understand of view, this is a crucial property. why disorder is so crucial for the global, mechanical re- Putting all this together, we conclude that the affine sponse of collection of particles that act through short assumption gives the correct prediction for the bulk mod- α 2 α 2 range interactions, consider the local motion of a packing ulus (since k δ − ∆φ − ), but fails for the shear of spherical, soft frictionless spheres under global forcing. modulus. This∼ failure∼ is due to the strongly non-affine The global stresses can be obtained from the relative po- nature of shear deformations: deviations from affine de- sitions rij and contact forces fij of pairs of contacting formations set the elastic constants [2, 20, 30, 43, 62]. 12

FIG. 13: (a) Illustration of deﬁnition of displacement angle α. (b-c) Probability distributions P (α) for compression (b) and shear (c), for Hertzian particles in two dimensions. The three pressures indicated correspond to z 6.0, z 4.5 and z 4.1 respectively (adapted from [30] — Copyright by the American Physical Society). ≈ ≈ ≈

As we will see below, the correspondence between the (Fig. (13)b-c). This is reminiscent of the P (α) of floppy bulk modulus and the affine prediction is fortuitous, since deformations, where the bond length does not change the response becomes singularly non-affine close to point and P (α) exhibits a δ-peak at π/2. Hence deformations J, for both compressive and shear deformations (section near jamming become strongly non-affine, and, at least III E 5). locally, resemble those of floppy modes. Non-affinity of Floppy Modes and Elastic Response — Wyart and co-workers have given variational arguments 4. Non-Affine Character of Deformations for deriving bounds on the energies and local deformations of soft (low energy) modes starting from purely Approaching the jamming transition, the spatial struc- floppy (zero energy) modes [54, 63]. They construct trial ture of the mechanical response becomes less and less soft modes that are basically floppy modes, obtained by similar to continuum elasticity, but instead increas- cutting bonds around a patch of size ℓ∗, and then mod- ingly reflects the details of the underlying disordered ulating these trial modes with a sine function of wave- packing and becomes increasingly non-affine [30] — see length ℓ∗ to make the displacements vanish at the loca- Fig. 4a. Here we will discuss this in the light of tions of the cut bonds [30, 54]. In particular, for the Eq. (8), which expresses the changes in energy as func- local deformations, they find [63] tion of the local deformations u and u : ∆E = ⊥ u 1 u 1 2 δij 2 ∆z , (15) 2 i,j kij u ,ij α 1 u ,ij . u ∼ ℓ → u ∼ || − − ⊥ ∗ PTo capture the degree of non-affinity of the response, ⊥ ⊥ Ellenbroek and co-workers have introduced the displace- where symbols without indices ij refer to typical or av- ment angle αij [94]. Here αij denotes the angle between erage values of the respective quantities. uij and rij , or, The question is whether the linear response follows this prediction for the soft modes. The width w of the peak in u ,ij P (α) is, close to the jamming transition, roughly u /u tan αij = ⊥ . (14) ⊥ u ,ij because αij π/2 u ,ij /u ,ij if u ,ij u ,ij . It turns out that| the− scaling|≈ behavior ⊥ (15) is consistent≪ ⊥ with the The probability distribution P (α) can probe the degree width w of the peak of P (α) for shear deformations, but of non-affinity by comparison with the expected P (α) for not for compression. There the peak of P (α) does not affine deformations. Affine compression corresponds to grow as much, and a substantial shoulder for large α re- a uniform shrinking of the bond vectors, i.e. u ,ij = 0 mains even close to jamming: the tendency for particles ⊥ while u ,ij = εrij < 0: the corresponding P (α) exhibits to move towards each other remains much more promi- a delta peak at− α = π. The effect of an affine shear on a nent under compression. bond vector depends on its orientation, and for isotropic Scaling of u and u — The scaling of the distributions random packings, P (α) is flat. of u and u has also⊥ been probed. The key observation Numerical determination of P (α) show that systems is that in Eq.⊥ (8) the terms u and u have opposite far away from the jamming point exhibit a P (α) similar signs. What is the relative contribution∼ || ⊥ of these terms, to the affine prediction, but that as point J is approached, and can we ignore the latter? Surprisingly, even though P (α) becomes increasingly peaked around α = π/2 δ 1, Eq. (15) predicts that the two terms are of equal ≪ 13

magnitude in soft modes, and so for linear response one (a) Effective medium theory (b) Packings (c) Random networks needs to be cautious. It has become clear that the balance of the terms is K/k K/k K/k never so precise as to qualitatively change the magni- 1 2 tude of the energy changes: ∆E and 2 i,j kij ( u ,ij) scale similarly [31, 62]. Hence, the typicalP values of|| u compression under a deformation are directly connected to the corre- ziso z ziso z ziso z sponding elastic modulus: For compression u is essentially independent of the distance to jamming (u ǫ), G/k G/k G/k ∼ while for shear, u ǫ ∆φ1/4, where ǫ is the magnitude shear of the strain [31, 62]. ∼ The scaling for u , the amount by which particles in ziso z ziso z ziso z contact slide past each⊥ other, is more subtle. Numer- ically, one observes that for shear deformations, u 1/4 ⊥ ∼ FIG. 14: Schematic comparison of the variation of shear (G) ǫ ∆φ− . The two terms u and u become com- ∼ || ∼ ⊥ and bulk (K) elastic moduli as function of distance to jam- parable here, and the amount of sideways sliding under ming. (a) In eﬀective medium theory, all elastic moduli are a shear deformation diverges near jamming [30, 31, 62]. simply of the order of the local spring constant k, and more- For compression there is no simple scaling. Combining over, the theory does not account for whether the packing the observed scaling for u with Eq. (15), one might have is rigid or not. (b) In jammed packings of harmonic parti- 1/2 cles, the bulk modulus K remains constant down to the jam- expected that u ǫ ∆φ− . However, the data suggests a weaker divergence,⊥ ∼ close to ∆φ 0.3. Hence, con- ming transition, where it vanishes discontinuously, whereas − the shear modulus G vanishes linearly in ∆z. (c) In random sistent with the absence of simple scaling of the peak of networks of elastic springs, both elastic moduli vanish lin- P (α) for compression, the two terms u and u ∝ || ∝ ⊥ early with ∆z. (From [62] — Copyright by the Institute of do not balance for compression. Nevertheless, both un- Physics). der shear and compression, the sliding, sideways motion of contacting particles dominates and diverges near jamming.

of the elastic moduli with contact number in effective 5. Effective Medium Theory, Rigidity Percolation, Random medium theory, for jammed packings and for random Networks and Jammed Systems networks is shown. This illustrates that EMT predicts that the elastic moduli vary smoothly through the iso- In 1984, Feng and Sen showed that elastic percolation static point and that the moduli are of order of the lois not equivalent to scalar percolation, but forms a new cal spring constant k. This is because effective medium universality class [64]. In the simplest realization of rigid- theory is essentially “blind” to local packing considera- ity percolation, bonds of a ordered spring network are tions and isostaticity. Thus, besides failing to capture randomly removed and the elastic response is probed. the vanishing of G near jamming, its prediction for the For such systems, both bulk and shear modulus go to bulk modulus fails spectacularly as well: it predicts finite zero at the elastic percolation threshold [95], and at this rigidity below isostaticity. Clearly random networks also threshold the contact number reaches the isostatic value fail to describe jammed systems, as for random networks 2d [65]. Later it was shown that rigidity percolation is both shear and bulk modulus vanish when z approaches singular on ordered lattices [66], but similar results are ziso — from the perspective of random networks, it is the expected to hold on irregular lattices. bulk modulus of jammed systems that behaves anoma- While it has been suggested that jamming of friction- lously. less spheres corresponds to the onset of rigidity percolation [59], there are significant differences, for example By comparing the displacement angle distributions that the contact number varies smoothly through the P (α) of jammed systems and random networks un- rigidity percolation threshold but jumps at the jamming der both shear and compression, Ellenbroek et al. con- transition [2]. Nevertheless, it is instructive to compare clude that two cases can be distinguished [62]. In the the response of random spring networks of given contact “generic” case, all geometrical characterizations exhibit number to those of jammed packings — note that the simple scaling and the elastic moduli scale as ∆z — this linear response of jammed packings of particles with one- describes shear and bulk deformations of randomly cut sided harmonic interactions is exactly equivalent to that networks, as well as shear deformations of jammed pack- of networks of appropriately loaded harmonic springs, ings. Jammed packings under compression form the “ex- with the nodes of the network given by the particle cen- ceptional” case: the fact that the compression modulus ters and the geometry and forces of the spring network remains of order k near jamming is reflected in the fact determined by the force network of the packing. that various characteristics of the local displacements do In Fig. (14), a schematic comparison of the variation not exhibit pure scaling. 14

FIG. 16: Frictionless (a) and frictional (b) disc in a groove [72]. (a) In the frictionless case, the system is isostatic, and the contact forces (black) balancing the gravitational force (blue) are unique. (b) In the frictional case, the system is hy- FIG. 15: Part of a packing of frictional discs in two dimensions perstatic: contact forces in hard frictional systems are, in gen- for low pressure, zero gravity and friction coeﬃcient = 10. eral, under-determined. In this example, there are four force For this packing, z 3.06 and φ 0.77 (this density includes degrees of freedom (two normal and two frictional forces), and ≈ ≈ rattlers, which are not shown in this image and occur in the only three balance equations (total force in x and y direction “holes”). Lines indicate the strength of the normal forces and torque balance). This leads to a family of solutions (three — note the large number of near contacts (pairs of particles examples indicated in red, orange and green) that balance the appearing to touch but not connected by a force line). Disc gravitational force (blue). Which of these is realized depends color indicates local contact number, clearly identifying the on the history of the system. large fraction of particles with two contacts only — these do not arise in frictionless systems.

larger than the minimal number needed for force balance F. Conclusion and rigidity, and frictional packings of soft spheres at jamming (or, equivalently, frictional rigid spheres), are µ For packings of soft frictionless spheres and in the limit hyperstatic: zc > ziso. Hyperstaticity implies that for of large systems, contact number, packing density, par- packings of rigid, frictional spheres, the contact forces ticle deformation and (for given force law) pressure are are not uniquely determined by the packing geometry, as all directly linked and at point J the system becomes iso- was the case for the isostatic packings of rigid, friction- static. The jamming transition for frictionless spheres less spheres [44, 45]. An explicit example of this so-called exhibits a number of non-trivial scaling behaviors, all in- indeterminacy of frictional forces is shown in Fig. 16 [72]. timately linked to the non-trivial square-root scaling of What does the deviation of the critical contact number the excess contact number with distance to the isostatic from the isostatic value imply for the scaling of quantities jamming point. We have stressed the viewpoint that ge- such as G, K and ω∗? We will show that these scale with µ ometry and mechanics are intimately linked for these sys- distance to the frictional isostatic point, z ziso. Thus, tems, and that near point J, local non-affinity and global when the jamming transition is approached,− bulk quanti- anomalous mechanical scaling go hand in hand. ties in general do not exhibit scaling with distance to the µ jamming point, since, at jamming, z approaches zc ziso [46, 67, 69, 70, 71, 73]. Scaling with distance to jamming≥ µ IV. JAMMING OF FRICTIONAL SPHERES can only occur when zc = ziso. Hence, jamming is not critical for frictional systems: power law scaling of bulk Here we discuss the rich phenomenology of jamming quantities with distance to jamming is the exception, not of frictional soft spheres. The crucial difference with the rule. the frictionless case is that both the packing density φc The jamming scenario for frictional soft spheres is de- and contact number zc at jamming are not unique: both tailed below. We briefly discuss the frictional contact depend on the friction coefficient and on the history of laws in section IV 1. In section IVA we discuss the prop- the packing, and are lower than for frictionless spheres erties of frictional sphere packings at the jamming thresh- [37, 46, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71] — see figure 15. old, or equivalently, packings of undeformable frictional Jamming and isostaticity no longer go hand in hand spheres. We focus on the variation of the range of contact for frictional spheres. The contact number at jamming, numbers and densities as function of in sections IV A 1- zc, can range from d +1 to 2d, where d + 1 is the iso- IV A 3. Finally in section IV A 4 we introduce the concept µ static value ziso for frictional spheres (see section IVA1 of generalized isostaticity, which is relevant for frictional µ and Appendix A). It appears that zc approaches ziso packings that have fully mobilized contacts. Section IV B only in the limit of and very slow equilibration concerns frictional packings at finite pressures and we of the packings [69, 70,→ ∞71] — see section IVA4. In discuss the (breakdown) of scaling with distance to jam- all other cases, the number of contacts at jamming is ming. 15

1. Frictional Contact Laws

Friction is taken into account by extending the contact force model to account both for normal forces Fn and tangential forces Ft. In the simple Coulomb picture of friction, contacts do not slide as long as the ratio of tangential and normal forces remains smaller than or equal to the friction coefficient : Ft /Fn , which introduces a very sharp nonlinearity| in| the contact≤ laws. Typical values for relevant in experiments range from 0.1 to 1, which is where properties of frictional packs vary strongly with . FIG. 17: (a) Example of the variation of the zero pressure Frictional forces do not only depend on the relative contact number zc in two-dimensional rigid discs as function of , smoothly interpolating between the isostatic limits 2d position of the contacting particles, but also on their (red) for zero friction and d + 1 (blue) for frictional contacts. history [22, 37, 71, 72, 73, 74]. This is encoded in The arched area indicate combinations of contact numbers the widely used Hertz-Mindlin model for frictional three- and that, while they are not reached in these numerics, are dimensional spheres, which takes the normal force Fn perfectly possible — see text (adapted from [68] — Copy- 3/2 ∼ δ with δ the overlap between particles, while the tan- right by the American Physical Society). (b) State diagram 1/2 gential force increment dFt δ dt where dt is the rela- for frictional spheres. While the Random Close Packed, iso- ∼ tive tangential displacement change, provided Ft Fn static packings obtained for zero friction are compatible with [22, 71, 74]. Studies of friction can also be performed≤ for all values of , a range of packings with lower densities and other contact laws, most notably, the linear model for contact numbers open up when > 0. For a given preparation protocol, there might be a well-defined density (dashed which Fn δ, so that the stiffness of the contacts in the normal and∼ tangential direction are independent of the curve). Whether there is a well defined lowest packing fraction for given , which would define Random Loose Packing, normal force and do not vary with distance to jamming is an open question, and the question what the contact num- [46]. ber of such states would be is open as well ( adapted from [75]).

A. Frictional Packings at Zero Pressure as function of . 1. Contact Number Simulations show that in practice zc is a decreasing function of , approaching 2d at small and approach- How can the counting arguments for the contact ing d + 1 for large friction coefficient [46, 68, 69, 70, 71] number at zero pressure be extended to the frictional (Fig. 17a). However, zc() cannot be a sharply defined case? On the one hand, the requirement that contacting curve unless additional information about the prepara- spheres precisely touch is the same as for the frictionless tion history is given: From the non-sliding condition case, and gives zN/2 constraints on the dN particle co- Ft /Fn it follows that a packing which is stable | | ≤ ordinates, leading to z 2d. On the other hand, for fric- for a certain value of remains so for all larger values tional packings, the constraint≤ counting for the zdN/2 of — increasing the friction coefficient only expands contact force components constrained by dN force and the range of allowed force configurations (and does not d(d 1)N/2 torque balance equations (see Appendix A) change any of the contact forces). Hence, a numerically − µ gives z d + 1, where the isostatic value z = d + 1. obtained curve zc() at best is a bound for the allowed ≥ iso Combining these two bounds, frictional spheres can at- combinations of zc and (see Fig. 17a). History is a tain a range of contact numbers: d +1 zc 2d (see second additional ingredient to consider [37], although Appendix A). ≤ ≤ it is remarkable that several different equilibration algo- It is important to stress that neither bound is sensi- rithms appear to give very similar estimates for zc() tive to the value of . What mechanism (if any) selects [37, 46, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71]. the contact number zc of a frictional packing at jamming? The first additional ingredient to consider is the Coulomb 2. Density criterion that for all contact forces Ft /Fn . So, while constraint counting allows force configurations| | ≤ that satisfy force and torque balance for z arbitrarily close to The existence of a wide range of statistically different µ ziso, such configurations are not guaranteed to be com- frictional packings is also reflected in packing densities, patible with the Coulomb criterion, and in particular for which experimentally are more easily observed than the small they generally will not be. This is consistent with contact number. It is well known that packings of spher- the intuition that a small increase of away from zero ical hard particles under gravity (in other words, fric- is not expected to make zc jump from 2d to d +1. In tional spheres close to jamming) can be compacted over section IV A 4 we will discuss an additional bound on z a range of densities [76]. Different packing densities of 16 these systems do not correspond to deformations of the particles, but to changes in the organization of the particles. Hence, at jamming, the range of packing densities does not go to zero for frictional particles. The relation between density and friction coefficient can be summarized in a simple state diagram (Fig. 17b), which stresses that random close packing (RCP) is independent of , while the random loose packing (RLP) density depends strongly on , thus connecting random close packing, random loose packing and value of the friction coefficient [69, 70, 73, 77, 78, 79, 80]. This diagram further suggests that the packing density at point J may also be seen as random loose packing of frictionless spheres (since for = 0, one expects RCP and RLP to coincide) — it is the loosest possible packings, rather FIG. 18: Generalized isostaticity plot, comparing the frac- than the densest possible ones, that arise near jamming. tion of fully mobilized contacts per particle, nm, to the con- It should be noted that the definition of RLP is even tact number, z. Data points (open symbols) are for two- more contentious than RCP, and the debate is wide open dimensional systems and for ranging from 0.001 to 1000 at [73, 78, 79, 79]. finite P . The black squares are the corresponding nm and z extrapolated to P = 0. The left and bottom axes refer to the numerical values for contact number and number of fully mobilized contacts per particle, n , for this specific two- 3. Scaling with m dimensional example, while right and top axes give the corresponding general expressions for higher dimensions. The red One may now also wonder how the contact number and line denotes the generalized isostaticity line where the number packing density at jamming scale with . Qualitative ev- of fully mobilized contacts is maximized: nm = d(z d 1)/2. − − idence for scaling was found by Silbert et al. in numerical The area to the right of this line refers to generalized hyper- studies of frictional packings (Fig. 2 and 3 from [46]). By static packings, while the area to the left of the red line is focussing explicitly on a single preparation protocol, such forbidden (adapted from [70] — Copyright by the American as slow equilibration, this becomes a well posed ques- Physical Society). tion — leading to the concept of generalized isostaticity, defined below. Data for generalized isostatic packings that F /F = [46, 70, 81]. One imagines that during suggests that both contact number and density exhibit | t| n power law scaling with for small friction, while for large equilibration, many contacts slowly slide, and when the friction, excess contact number and density (defined with packing jams many contacts are still close to failure — respect to the infinite friction limit) are also related by such packings are marginal with respect to lowering . scaling, although clearly more work is needed to establish For packings with fully mobilized contacts, the count- these scalings firmly [70, 73]. ing arguments need to be augmented, since at fully mobilized contacts, the frictional and normal forces are no longer independent [70]. Defining the number of fully 4. Generalized Isostaticity mobilized contacts per particle as nm, the constraints for the zdN/2 force degrees of freedom then are: dN force balance equations, d(d 1)N/2 torque balance equations, Here we will discuss the role of the frictional forces in − and nmN constraints for the fully mobilized contacts. some more detail, and in particular focus on frictional This yields the following relation between z, zµ = d +1 packings for which a large number of contacts are fully iso and nm[96]: mobilized, meaning that the frictional forces are maximal: F /F = ). These packings arise in numerical µ t n z ziso 2nm/d . (16) studies| when| packings are equilibrated slowly for a wide − ≥ range of values of . Surprisingly, for sufficiently slowly equilibrated pack- The mobilization, m, of a contact is defined as the ra- ings and for all values of , the values for nm and z tio Ft /(Fn), and ranges from zero to one (fully mobi- tend to satisfy this bound when P is lowered to zero lized).| | Earlier numerical data suggested that m generally (Fig. 18). Such packings which maximize their number stays away from 1, and that in the limit of large , the of fully mobilized contacts have been referred to as “gen- distribution of the mobilization P (m) becomes indepen- eralized isostatic” packings [70, 81]. These should be dent of [37, 46]. Later it became clear that P (m) can widely occurring, since most preparation algorithm tend depend strongly on the preparation history [69]. Futher- to equilibrate slowly [37, 46, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71]. more, frictional two-dimensional packings which are very For fully mobilized packings, the amount of fully mo- slowly equilibrated yield packings for which a substantial bilized contacts vanishes in the limit of infinite friction amount of the contact forces are fully mobilized, meaning (see Fig. 18), consistent with the observation that there 17

B. Frictional Packings at Finite Pressure

Once a mechanically stable frictional packing has been created, its linear mechanical response is given by the dynamical matrix. For Hertz-Mindlin type interactions, each contact can be thought of as being given by two springs (one parallel to the contact vector rij , one perpendicular to the contact vector), the spring constants of which are set by the normal force and the Poisson ratio [23]. Various authors have found that, for essentially all values of , the excess contact number z zc grows as a square root with the excess density [67,− 71, 73] — for Hertzian contacts, this is equivalent to stating that 1/3 z zc P . However, zc differs from the frictional − ∼ µ isostatic value d + 1, so that z ziso does not scale with pressure (see Fig. 19a,b). Note− that the slope in Fig. 19b, which represents the prefactor z0 in a scaling law of the form z zc = z0√φ φc does not appear to vary strongly with −. As is the case− for frictionless particles, it is es- sential to remove rattlers for the count of the contact number, but include them for the estimate of the density to obtain the square root scaling of z zc over an appreciable range [70]. This square root scaling− is intriguing and, as far as we are aware, without explanation. ∗ FIG. 19: Scaling of contact number, w and elastic mod- The deviations of zc from the isostatic value imply uli for frictional discs, interacting through three-dimensional that packings near the (un)jamming transition do not ap- Hertzian-Mindlin forces. (a) The zero pressure contact num- proach isostatic packings, and consistent with this, there ber, zJ does not reach the isostatic limit (z = 3) unless is is, in general, no scaling of the mechanical properties as very large. (b) The excess coordination number z zJ scales − function of distance to jamming. linearly with P 1/3 √∆φ. (c-d) The characteristic frequency of the DOS, ω∗, scales∼ similarly to z 3 [89]. (e) The bulk The mechanical properties do, however, scale with the modulus K (red curves) approaches a− plateau for small P , distance to the isostatic point, as measured by the con- while G appears to scale as z 3 [90]. (f) As in frictionless tact number. First, calculations of the characteristic − spheres, the ratio G/K scales with distance to the isostatic frequency ω∗ from the density of vibrational states for point, now given by z zµ = z 3 (adapted from [71] — two-dimensional frictional packings show that the vari- − iso − Copyright by the American Physical Society ). ation of ω∗ with and distance to jamming (as measured by the pressure P ) is very similar to that of z (Fig. 19c). In fact, when this data is replotted as func- µ tion of z ziso = z 3 one finds a linear relation be- − µ − tween ω∗ and z ziso (Fig. 19d). Second, the ratio of the z d + 1. The number of fully mobilized contacts shear and bulk− modulus exhibits the same phenomenol- ≈ µ is maximal for vanishingly small friction (which we re- ogy: G/K scales linearly with z ziso = z 3 (19e-f) fer to as = 0+), where, by continuity, z 2d, and [71, 82]. These findings suggest that,− in general,− scaling ≈ nm d(d 1)/2. Taking into account that each contact is governed by the distance to isostaticity, rather than is shared≈ by− two particles, the fraction of fully mobilized the distance to jamming. contacts is (d 1)/2 — hence in two dimensions, 50% The contact number and geometry of the packings of all contacts− are fully mobilized, in three dimensions, change smoothly with [71, 73], while the mechanical 100% of the contacts would be fully mobilized for =0+, behavior exhibits a discontinuous jump from = 0 to and in higher dimensions one cannot reach generalized = 0+. This is caused by the fact that when fric- isostaticity for =0+. tion is included, the nature of the dynamical matrix changes completely, because the tangential contact stiff- By itself, the inequality (16) is not a stricter bound on nesses jump from zero to a finite value. When the tangen- z than the ordinary condition z d+1, since n () is un- tial stiffness is varied smoothly from = 0 to finite fric- ≥ m known. However, if we could determine nm(), we would tion, the mechanical properties vary smoothly also [53]. immediately obtain the bound z = d +1+2 nm()/d. It Finally a word of caution regarding the notion of gener- is, at present, an open question how nm() can be esti- alized isostaticity and the role of fully mobilized contacts mated or obtained numerically other than through direct for scaling away from jamming. In the calculations pre- numerical simulations. sented above fully mobilized contacts are treated as or- 18 dinary elastic contacts. Strictly speaking, such marginal contacts cause a breakdown of linear response. One may argue that tiny perturbations would simply let the fully mobilized contacts relax to almost-fully-mobilized, after which linear response would no longer be problematic. Taking the opposite view, Henkes et al. have recently shown that if the dynamical matrix is calculated under the assumption that fully mobilized contacts can slide freely, the characteristic frequency ω∗ scales and vanishes with P for all values of — provided one considers systems that approach generalized isostaticity [53].

C. Conclusion

Jamming of frictional grains can be seen as a two-step process. The first step is the selection of a contact number, z, given the friction coefficient, pressure and procedure. In the second step, in which the mechanical properties of the packing are determined, everything scales with z zµ . The crucial difference with frictionless spheres − iso is that the contact number zc at the P = 0 jamming µ point in general does not coincide with ziso. Most quan- FIG. 20: (a) Packing fraction φ of spheroids (open symbols) tities are governed by the contact number and scale with and general ellipsoids (blue symbols) as function of the as- distance to isostaticity, while the contact number itself phericity α. The density shows a cusp at α = 1 (sphere scales with distance to jamming. limit). The orange line indicates the HCP packing density 0.74, which is almost reached by random packings of some ellipsoids.≈ (b) The contact number, z, for the same spheroids V. JAMMING OF NON-SPHERICAL and ellipsoids as shown in panel (a) also shows a cusp at PARTICLES α = 1. The red, green and blue lines at z = 6, z = 10 and z = 12 indicate the isostatic contact numbers for spheres, spheroids and ellipsoids (adapted from [83] — Copyright by New phenomena occur in packings of non-spherical The American Association for the Advancement of Science). particles, and here we briefly discuss the jamming scenario for frictionless ellipsoids. First, configurations for hard (or zero pressure) fric- A. Packings of Spherocylinders, Spheroids and tionless ellipsoids pack more densely and have larger con- Ellipsoids tact numbers than frictionless spheres [48, 49, 50, 83]. As we discuss in section V A, both the increase in density and in contact number away from the sphere limit Spherocylinders — Early indications for surprisingly are continuous but not smooth — plots of φ and z as dense packings of non-spherical particles come from stud- function of the ellipticity show a cusp at the sphere limit ies of spherocylinders, particles consisting of a cylinder of (Fig 20). length a and diameter 1, which on both ends are capped Second, the counting arguments for general ellipsoids by a half sphere. For zero a, these are spheres, while suggest that at jamming, ellipsoids attain z = ziso = the large a limit is relevant for the loose packings of thin d(d + 1). However, weakly aspherical ellipsoids actually (colloidal) rods [84]. Williams et al. studied the packing attain a contact number arbitrarily close to the sphere fraction and contact numbers of such spherocylinders nu- limit z = 2d. As a consequence, (weakly) ellipsoidal merically, and found that both the packing fraction φ and packings are strongly hypostatic (underconstrained) near contact number z increase when a is increased, reach a jamming. This leads to questions about the relation be- maximum for a 0.4, and then decrease [85]. The den- ∼ tween contact number, rigidity and floppy modes (section sity peaks at a value of 0.695, substantially larger than V B). the typical values for random close packing of spheres Third, the question arises whether quantities such as z 0.64, while for large a > 10 the density decays as φ∼ 1/a, consistent with arguments given before [84]. and ω∗ exhibit scaling, either as function of the pressure, ∼ as function of the asphericity or as function of distance The contact number in these simulations was found to to either the spherical or the ellipsoidal isostatic point — start out at z 5.8 for a = 0, and increased until it the partial answers to these questions, based on recent reached z 9 for≈ a 0.4. The initial value is close to studies of the density of states [49, 50] will be addressed the isostatic≈ number for≈ spheres (6), while the peak value in section V C. is similar to the isostatic number for rods (10) [86]. 19

Spheroids and Ellipsoids — In seminal work, Donev The key observation is that in the counting arguments et al. explored the packing properties of hard spheroids for ellipsoids, the rotational degrees of freedom are taken and ellipsoids [83]. As shown in Fig 20a, the density into account while for spheres, where they correspond of spheroids (axis: 1 : 1 : α) exhibits a cusp-like local to trivial rotations of the particles, these are ignored. minimum for the pure spherical case α = 1, and reaches When these rotational degrees of freedom are also taken two local maxima: oblate (disc-like) spheroids at α 0.6 into account for frictionless spheres, one obtains precisely pack at a density φ 0.70 and prolate (cigar-shaped)≈ N(d(d 1)/2) trivial floppy modes, corresponding to the ellipsoids at α =1.5 pack≈ even denser at φ 0.715. Note trivial rotational− degrees of freedom of individual friction- that the spheroid packing density only drops≈ below the less spheres [48, 50]. These floppy modes do not affect random close packing value for spheres for very strongly the rigidity of the packings, which suggests that, in gen- oblate (α . 0.25) or prolate (α & 4) particles. eral, absence of floppy modes may be a sufficient but not Even larger packing densities can be obtained for tri- a necessary condition for rigidity [48]. axial ellipsoids, and for the case that the axes are given From the perspective of constraint counting of the as 1/α : 1 : α, the maximum packing density peaks at contact forces, something similar happens in the sphere 0.735 for α 1.25, [48, 83]. This density is surprisingly limit: how do dN force degrees of freedom satisfy both close to the density≈ 0.74 obtained for fcc and hcp pack- dN force balance equations and also all the additional ings, which are the≈ densest possible packings for spheres torque balance equations? The answer is simple: for fric- — but those are crystals, whereas the ellipsoidal pack- tionless spheres, the torques exerted by each contact force ings do not show any appreciable orientational ordering. is zero, and so torque balance is trivially satisfied. Finally, crystals of ellipsoids can be packed even denser, The key question, however, is what happens to hypo- with the highest density currently known, 0.7707, is ob- static packings at finite asphericity and pressure. The tained in non lattice periodic packings of spheroids with full answers are not known, but two recent studies on either α √3 or α 1/√3 [87]. the density of vibrational states for soft frictionless bidis- ≥ ≤ The contact number grows monotonically with as- perse two-dimensional ellipses [49] and three-dimensional phericity, from a value 2d for the spherical case to spheroids [50] provide important ingredients that we will values close to the corresponding≈ higher isostatic number discuss below. for ellipsoids: The contact number for the spheroids measured for strongly oblate or prolate appears to level off at values around 9.8 (the corresponding isostatic number is C. Jamming of Ellipsoids 10), and for ellipsoids one reaches 11.4 (the corresponding isostatic number is 12) [83]. (The contact numbers in the The main findings for the density of states of ellip- disordered ellipsoidal systems are difficult to obtain accu- soidal particles are shown in Fig. 21. Close to the sphere rately from numerics, in particular for hard particles — limit, where the contact number is far below the rele- since, similar to hard spheres, one expects anomalously vant ellipsoidal isostatic value, the density of states con- many near contacts [42, 47]). It is noteworthy that the sists of three bands: first, a number of zero frequency, contact numbers reach these asymptotic values at the floppy modes corresponding to the degree of hypostatic- same asphericities where the density is maximal. Recent ity, second, a band of rotational modes, and third, a work on two-dimensional ellipses [48, 49] and three di- band of translational modes, corresponding to the trans- mensional spheroids [50] confirm these trends in contact lational modes present for the pure sphere case. When, numbers. for increasing pressure and/or strong ellipticity, the contact number starts to approach the ellipsoidal isostatic value, the rotational and translational bands hybridize B. Counting arguments, Floppy modes and and merge. Finally, when the contact number exceeds Rigidity of Ellipsoids the ellipsoidal isostatic value, the floppy modes have van- ished and the characteristic frequency of the remaining The counting arguments for general ellipsoids suggest single band density of states scales with distance to the that at jamming, ellipsoids attain z = ziso = d(d + 1). ellipsoidal isostatic value. However, weakly aspherical ellipsoids actually attain a The counting arguments provide a clear picture of the contact number arbitrarily close to the sphere limit z = number of modes per band, as shown in Fig. 22, where 2d. Hence counting arguments suggest that packings the variation of these numbers with contact number is of weakly ellipsoidal particles possess a large number of shown for the case of spheroids in 3d. floppy modes. Are these packings stable? First, the vibrational modes present for the spherical As a first step in understanding such packings, it is case are only weakly perturbed by the inclusion of weak helpful to think about weakly aspherical ellipsoids that ellipticity, so their number still equals dN. The particle approach the sphere limit. The number of floppy modes motions of modes in this band are essentially transla- in such an underconstrained system equals (N/2)(ziso tional, and the characteristic frequency of this band, ω∗, − sphere ellips z), which for the sphere limit (where z 2d) equals still scales with z ziso , not with z ziso . Hence, this N(d(d 1)/2). What are these floppy modes?→ part of the density− of states is smoothly− perturbed when − 20

FIG. 21: Schematic scenario for the density of states for frictionless soft ellipsoidal particles, based on [49, 50]. (a-d) Den- sity of states as function of distance to the spherical limit. The grey, blue, red and green colors refer to floppy modes, rotational modes, translational modes and hybridized modes respectively. (a) For frictionless spheres, one usually only considers the translational band (red), but when one takes the rotational degrees of freedom into account, a large number of trivial floppy modes occur (dashed grey line). (b) For contact numbers just above z zsphere, the density of states ex- − iso hibits three bands, and the characteristic frequencies ωs and ∗ sphere ω scale with asphericity and z ziso respectively — see FIG. 22: Schematic representation of the number of modes − ellip per band for the specific case of spheroids in three dimensions text. (c) For contact numbers approaching z ziso , the rotational and translational band merge. (d) For− contact numbers — from [50] — Copyright by the Institute of Physics above z zellip, there are no floppy modes and the character- − iso istic frequency ω† scales with z zellip − iso imagines that near such systems there must exhibit many directions in phase space where the second derivative is zero (leading to quartic modes [49]), but a deep under- going from the sphere to the weakly ellipsoidal case. ellip standing is missing. Second, for z

stiffness takes on a finite value which leads to contributions to the dynamical matrix of order one, contributions which are absent in the frictionless case. Friction become a smooth perturbation only when the tangential stiffness is varied smoothly with .

A. Open Questions

A crucial question is that of experimental relevance. Many recent predictions of the theory should be observ- able in experiment, in particular for frictionless systems such as foams and emulsions, but very few have been observed so far. Frictional packings have been explored theoretically far less than frictionless systems, despite their obvious experimental relevance [12, 88]. How many different order parameters does one need to characterize the statistics of generic frictional packings? More work is needed to clarify the notion of random loose packing [77, 78, 79], and to unravel the role of packing protocols. What is the underlying distribution of pos- FIG. 23: Conjectured range of selected contact numbers at sible contact numbers and densities for frictional spheres, jamming, i.e., at P = 0, as function of the friction coefficient given a certain pressure and friction coefficient? Do RCP and ellipticity ǫ. The red dot indicates the isostatic limit for frictionless spheres at ( = 0, ǫ = 0), the green line indicates and RLP correspond to sharp gradients in this distribu- the isostatic limit for frictionless ellipsoids ( = 0, ǫ = 0) tion? Are the RCP and RLP limits identical for fric- and the blue plane indicates the isostatic limit for frictio nal tionless packings? Random packings of spheres are much particles ( = 0). The contact number is precisely selected looser then random packings of non spherical particles — in the frictionless plane, and for sufficiently large ellipticity can we understand why? the contact number crosses the isostatic value (green dot). It is, in many cases, unknown how results obtained Once friction comes into play, a range of contact numbers are for frictionless spheres extend to more complex systems. allowed. For a given and ǫ, the upper bound is given by the For example, do a diverging length scale and a singularly selected contact number for frictionless ellipsoids at = 0, non-affine response arise when frictional spheres or el- while the lower bound is given by the generalized isostaticity lipses approach their isostatic limit(s)? What about the limit — i.e., for finite , the maximal number of contacts is fully mobilized here, and only for does z reach the elastic moduli [71, 82]? Similarly, what is the jamming frictional isostatic value z = d + 1. → ∞ scenario for more general particles, such as frictional ellipses and non convex particles that may share multiple contacts? What is the scenario for more general interactions (attraction, long range...)? the preparation procedure, even for finite pressures. For Given the central role of the square-root scaling of the frictional particles, a range of contact numbers arises and contact number with distance to jamming, it would be the history becomes crucial. useful to probe the connection to the square-root singu- Jamming of frictionless soft spheres constitutes a spe- larity of g(r) — the argument outlined in section III D 1 cial case, since here the isostatic contact number (exclud- assumes displacements to be primarily affine, while near ing the trivial rotational degrees of freedom of the parti- J, the displacements are singularly non-affine and di- cles) is reached at the jamming threshold. The counting verge. What may happen is that the relative displace- for ellipsoidal particles takes these rotational degrees into ment of particles that are not in contact are not strongly account, which leads to strongly hypostatic packings near non-affine — we don’t know. For frictional spheres it is jamming — however, the associated zero modes do not not understood whether z zc exhibits true square root appear to contribute to the mechanical properties of the scaling with excess density,− and whether g(r) exhibits packings. Furthermore, the perturbation from spheres similar scaling behavior there. to weak ellipsoids is smooth, when the trivial rotational Essentially all the work discussed above focuses on av- modes for the spheres is included. eraged quantities and linear response. For finite systems, Friction, however, acts differently. Given a certain contact numbers, moduli etc exhibit significant differ- preparation procedure, the change in contact number is ences in different realizations [2, 52]. Can we understand smooth with . However, the frictional interactions are these fluctuations near jamming? What is the nonlinear such that at the level of the dynamical matrix, the in- yielding behavior of systems near jamming [2]? clusion of arbitrary small friction introduces a discontin- A whole host of new phenomena arise when jammed uous change. For any value of the friction the tangential systems are put under shear stress, and possibly are made 22 to flow [5, 6, 8, 9], or when systems of finite temperature nization and anomalous mechanical properties near the [10, 11] are considered. Can these phenomena be con- isostatic/jamming limit. Important tasks for the coming nected in a meaningful manner to the zero shear, zero years include exploring the relevance of these observa- temperature limit? tions for experimental observations and for systems with more complex interactions. New horizons are emerging for systems at finite temperature and in particular for B. Outlook flow near jamming — as attested by the rich phenomenology of flowing foams, suspensions and granular media. Jamming is cool [1], as it provides a framework to approach the mechanics of disordered systems. The studies of the simplest case of static soft frictionless spheres have VII. REFERENCES demonstrated that such systems exhibit rich spatial orga-

[1] Liu AJ and Nagel S R 1998, Nature 396, 21 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55, 1739 [2] O’Hern C S, Silbert L E, Liu A J and Nagel S R 2003 [26] Brakke K A 1996 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 354 Phys. Rev. E 68, 011306 2143; http://www.susqu.edu/brakke [3] Lois G, Blawzdziewicz J and OHern CS 2008 Phys Rev. [27] Mason T G, Bibette J and Weitz D A 1995 Phys Rev. Lett. 100 028001 Lett. 75, 2051 [4] Hastings MB, Olson Reichardt CJ, and Reichardt C 2003 [28] Lacasse M D, Grest G S, Levine D, Mason T G and Weitz Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 098302 D A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3448 [5] Olsson P and Teitel S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 178001 [29] Mason T G, Lacasse M D, Grest G S, Levine D, Bibette [6] Langlois VJ, Hutzler S and Weaire D 2008 Phys. Rev. E J and Weitz D A 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56, 3150 78, 021401 [30] Ellenbroek W G, Somfai E, van Hecke M and van Saar- [7] Katgert G, Mobius ME and van Hecke M 2008 Phys. Rev. loos W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 258001 Lett. 101, 058301 [31] Ellenbroek W G, van Hecke M and van Saarloos W 2009, [8] Head DA 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 138001 arXiv:0911.0944 [9] Hatano T 2007 Phys. Rev. E 75, 060301; Hatano T 2008 [32] Radjai F and Roux S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 064302 J. Phys. Soc. Jap.77, 123002 ; Hatano T 2009 Phys. Rev. [33] Tanguy A, Wittmer J P, Leonforte F and Barrat J L 2002 E 79, 050301 Phys. Rev. B 66 4205 [10] Berthier L and Witten TA 2009, Europhys. Lett. 86, [34] Tanguy A, Leonforte F, Wittmer JP and Barrat J L 2004 10001 App. Surf. Sci. 226, 282 [11] Zhang ZX, Xu N, Chen DTN, Yunker P, Alsayed AM, [35] Lemaˆıtre A and Maloney C 2006, J. Stat. Phys. 123, 415 Aptowicz KB, Habdas P, Liu AJ and Nagel SR 2009 Na- [36] Maloney CE 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 035503 ture 459, 230 [37] Kasahara A, and Nakanishi H 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70, [12] Majmudar TS, Sperl M, Luding S and Behringer RP 2007 051309 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 058001 [38] Donev A, Torquato S, Stillinger FH and Connelly R 2004 [13] Dauchot O, Marty G and Biroli G 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. Phys. Rev. E 70, 043301; O’Hern CS, Silbert LE, Liu AJ 95, 265701; Lechenault F, Dauchot O, Biroli G and and Nagel SR 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70, 043302 Bouchaud JP 2008 Europhys. Lett. 83, 46003 [39] Press W H, Flannery B P, Teukolsky S A and Vetter- [14] Keys AS, Abate AR, Glotzer SC and Durian DJ 2007 ling W T, Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 (Cambridge Nature Phys. 4, 260; Abate AR, Durian DJ 2008 Phys. University Press, New York, 1986) Rev. Lett. 101, 245701 [40] OHern C S, Langer S A, Liu A J and Nagel S R 2002 [15] Bolton F and Weaire D 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3449 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 075507 [16] Kraynik A M 1988, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 325 [41] Torquato S, Truskett TM and Debenedetti PG 2000 [17] Princen H M 1983J. Coll. Int. Sc. 91, 160 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2064 [18] Princen H M and Kiss A D 1986 J. Coll. Int. Sc. 112, [42] Silbert L E, Liu A J and Nagel S R 2006 Phys. Rev. E 427 73, 041304 [19] Weitz D 2004 Science 303, 968 [43] Alexander S 1998, Phys. Rep. 296, 65 [20] Makse HA, Gland N, Johnson DL and Schwartz LM 1999 [44] Moukarzel CF 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1634 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5070 [45] Tkachenko AV and Witten TA 1999 Phys. Rev. E 60, [21] Johnson DL, Makse HA, Gland N and Schwartz L 2000 687 Phys. B - Cond. Matt. 279, 134 [46] Silbert L E, Erta¸sD, Grest G S, Halsey T C and Levine [22] Makse HA, Gland N, Johnson DL and Schwartz L 2004 D 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65, 031304 Phys. Rev. E 70, 061302 [47] Donev A, Torquato S and Stillinger F H 2005 Phys. Rev. [23] Johnson KL 1985 Contact Mechanics , Cambridge Univ. E 71, 011105 Press [48] Donev A, Connelly R, Stillinger F H and Torquato S [24] Somfai E, Roux J N, Snoeijer J H, Van Hecke M and Van 2007, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051304 Saarloos W 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 1301 [49] Mailman M, Schreck CF, O’Hern CS and Chakraborty B [25] Durian D J 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4780; Durian D J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 255501 23

[50] Zeravcic Z, Xu N, Liu AJ, Nagel SR and van Saarloos W 27 1053 2009 EPL 87 26001 [81] Bouchaud J-P 2004 Proceedings of the Les Houches Sum- [51] Ellenbroek W and Zeravcic Z, priv. comm. mer School of Theoretical Physics, Session LXXVII eds [52] Henkes S and Chakraborty B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 J.-L. Barrat, M. Feigelman, J. Kurchan, and J. Dalibard 061301 [82] Magnanimo V, La Ragione L, Jenkins J T, Wang P and [53] Henkes S, van Hecke M and van Saarloos W 2009, Makse H A 2008, Europhys. Lett. 81 34006 preprint arXiv:0907.3451 [83] Donev A, Cisse I, Sachs D, Variano E A, Stillinger F H, [54] Wyart M, Silbert L E, Nagel S R and Witten T A 2005 Connelly R, Torquato S and Chaikin P M 2004 Science Phys. Rev. E 72 051306; Wyart M 2005 Ann. Phys. Fr. 303, 990 30 1; Wyart M, Nagel S R and Witten T A 2005, Euro- [84] Philipse A P 1996 Langmuir 12 1127; 5971 (correction) phys. Lett. 72 486 [85] Williams S R and Philipse A P 2003 Phys. Rev. E 67 [55] Tkachenko AV, Witten TA 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62, 2510 051301 [56] Silbert L E, Liu A J and Nagel S R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. [86] The data also suggested that z decays monotonically for 95 098301 large a but this is likely due to a problem with the contact [57] Leonforte F, Tanguy A, Wittmer JP and Barrat JL 2004 counting (A P Philipse, Priv. Comm.) Phys. Rev. B 70, 014203 [87] Donev A, Stillinger F H, Chaikin P M, and Torquato S [58] Silbert LE, Liu AJ, Nagel SR 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 255506 021308 [88] Jacob X, Aleshin V, Tournat V, Leclaire P, Lauriks W, [59] Zeravcic Z, van Saarloos W and Nelson 2008 Europhys. Gusev V E 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 158003; Bonneau Lett. 83, 44001 L, Andreotti B and Clement E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 [60] Xu N, Vitelli V, Liu A J and Nagel S R, 2009, 118001 arXiv:0909.3701 [89] A trivial scaling of ω P 1/6, characteristic for Hertzian [61] Goldenberg C, Goldhirsch I 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, contacts, has been scaled∼ out. 084302; Goldenberg C, Goldhirsch I 2005 Nature 435, [90] A trivial scaling of K, G P 1/3, characteristic for 188 Hertzian contacts, has been scaled∼ out [62] Ellenbroek WG, Zeravcic Z, van Saarloos W and van [91] When one strictly follows Hertz Law, one finds that ǫij Hecke M 2009 EPL 87 34004 depends on the radii Ri and Rj — but often ǫij is simply [63] Wyart M, Liang H, Kabla A and Mahadevan L 2008 takes as a constant, and for typical polydispersities, the Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 215501 effect of this for statistical properties of packings is likely [64] Feng S and Sen P N 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 216 small [31]. [65] Feng S, Thorpe M F, Garboczi E 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31 [92] For undeformable particles, the Lubachevsky-Stillinger 276 algorithm can be used [66] Jacobs D J and Thorpe M F 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 [93] It is an open question whether history never plays a role 4051; Moukarzel C and Duxbury P M 1995 Phys. Rev. for frictionless spheres — for example, one may imag- Lett. 75 4055 ine that by repeated decompression and recompression, [67] Makse H A, Johnson D L and Schwartz L M 2000 Phys. different ensembles of packings could be accessed. Rev. Lett. 84 4160 [94] not to be confused by the power law index of the inter- [68] Unger T, Kertesz J, Wolf D E 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 action potential 178001 [95] To translate the data for c11 and c44 as function of p [69] Zhang H P and Makse H A 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 011301 shown in fig 1, note that G = C44, and K = c11 - c44. [70] Shundyak K, van Hecke M and van Saarloos W 2007 All go to zero linearly in p pc. Phys. Rev. E 75, 010301 [96] the corresponding equation− in [70] is only correct for d = [71] Somfai E, van Hecke M, Ellenbroek W G, Shundyak K 2. and van Saarloos W 2007 Phys. Rev. E 75 020301(R) [72] Halsey T.C. and Ertas D. 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 5007 [73] Silbert L E 2008, Jamming of frictional spheres and random loose packing, preprint and Priv. Comm. [74] Johnson K L 1985 Contact Mechanics Cambridge Uni- versity Press [75] Somfai E, van Hecke M, Ellenbroek W G, Shundyak K and van Saarloos W 2005, preprint arXiv.org 0510506v1 [76] Knight J B, Fandrich C G, Lau C N, Jaeger H M and Nagel S R 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 3957; Ben-Naim E, Knight J B, Nowak E R, Jaeger H M and Nagel S R 1998 Physica D 123; Richard P, Nicodemi M, Delanney R, Ribiere P and Bideau D 2005 Nature Mat. 4 121 [77] Onoda G Y And Liniger E G 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 2727 [78] Song C, Wang P and Makse H A 2008 Nature 453 629 [79] Ciamarra M P and Coniglio A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 128001 [80] Bernal J D and Mason J 1960 Nature 188 910; Scott G D 1960 Nature 188 908; Finney J L 1970 Proc. R. Soc. London A 319 479; Berryman J G 1983, Phys. Rev. A 24

APPENDIX A: COUNTING ARGUMENTS FOR additional orientational degrees of freedom which are not THE CONTACT NUMBER symmetries — zero for spheres, 2N for spheroids in three dimensions, and d(d 1)N/2 for general ellipsoids. We − By constraint counting one can establish bounds on the denote these number of degrees of freedom relevant for contact number [43]. First, one may require that floppy ∆E by ˜b. modes, deformations that in lowest non trivial order do Absence of generic floppy modes requires that the num- not cost energy, are absent. This yields a lower bound ber of terms contributing to ∆E exceeds the number of on the contact number. Packings that violate this second degrees of freedom: zf/˜ 2 ˜b. ≥ constraint are called hypostatic, packings that marginally For frictionless particles, f˜ equals one, because energy fulfill this constraint are isostatic, and packings that ful- changes result from (de)compression of contacts only, fill this constraint are called hyperstatic. while for frictional particles, f˜ equals d, since relative Note that the same lower bound on the contact number motion of contacting particles in all directions are rele- is obtained by requiring that all contact forces balance. vant. As we will see, this is because the number of independent The situation for ˜b is simple for frictional particles, degrees of freedom necessarily to describe changes in the where all positional and orientational degrees of freedom energy at a contact equals the number of force degrees are relevant and ˜b = d(d+1)/2. For frictionless particles, of freedom per contact. Therefore, the requirement that ˜b depends on the symmetries. For frictionless spheres, floppy modes are absent is equivalent to the requirement only translational degrees of freedom are important and that the contact forces balance, and often the counting ˜b = d. For frictionless spheroids in three dimensions, two argument that yields the lower bound on z is phrased in additional rotational degrees of freedom come into play terms of the contact forces. and ˜b = 5, while for general frictionless ellipsoids, all Secondly, for packings at jamming, one arrives at a sec- rotational degrees are relevant and ˜b = d(d + 1)/2. ond constraint, which follows from the requirement that Equivalence of Floppy Mode and Force Balance the particles are undeformed at jamming. This yields an Counting — The requirement zf/˜ 2 ˜b is exactly the upper bound on the contact number. Violations of this same as requiring that there are sufficient≥ contact forces second condition are possible for special (non-generic) in the system so that they generically can be expected to packings, such as perfect crystals. balance: the number of contact force degrees of freedom As we will see, for frictionless particles the first and per particles is zf/˜ 2 and the number of equations that second bounds coincide. This does not necessarily im- need to be satisfied equals ˜b. The number of relevant ply that the corresponding contact numbers are real- particle degrees of freedom in the energy expansion thus ized at jamming: numerically it is found that frictionless corresponds to the number of force balance equations, spheres are indeed isostatic at jamming [2], while weakly and the number of terms in ∆E (= number of constraints aspherical frictionless ellipsoids are strongly hypostatic needed to generically avoid floppiness) correspond to the [48, 49, 59]. For frictional particles the two bounds never number of force degrees of freedom — changes in energy coincide, and numerically it is found that frictional par- and forces are directly linked. ticles are almost always hyperstatic at jamming. Note that even though the role of constraints and de- Below we present the counting arguments in detail, grees of freedom interchanges when altering the picture for packings of N soft particles in d dimensions which between absence of floppy modes and satisfaction of force interact through contact forces, and for which the con- balance, so does the requirement (floppy modes: making tact number z, is defined as the average number of con- sure there are no generic solutions, force balance: making tacts per particle. Note that the total number of contacts sure there are generic solution), and in the force balance equals Nz/2 — each contact is shared by two particles. picture one ends up with precisely the same inequality: As we will find below, to perform these counting argu- zf/˜ 2 ˜b. ments we need to know the number of force components Touch≥ — The conditions that particles precisely per contact, or equivalently, the number of independent touch yields Nz/2 constraints on the degrees of freedom degrees of freedom necessarily to describe changes in the of the particles. Denoting the number of geometric de- energy at a contact (f˜), the geometrical number of degrees per particle asx ˜, the condition that for generic grees freedom per particle (˜x) and the number of force packings there should be less constraints than degrees of balance equations per particle (˜b). freedom yields z/2 x˜. Absence of Floppy Modes — The counting that For the particles that≤ are considered here (spheres and follows from requiring that there are no floppy modes can ellipsoids with and without friction), the number of de- most easily be carried out by considering ∆E, the change grees of freedom per particles are their d positional co- in elastic energy as function of deformation of a certain ordinates, to which ellipsoids add their relevant angular packing. The number of terms contributing to ∆E equals degrees of freedom. For general ellipsoids, these yield the number of contacts, Nz/2, multiplied with f˜, the d(d + 1)/2 degrees of freedom — for spheroids in three number of independent degrees of freedom necessarily to dimensions (an ellipsoid with two equal axes, which thus describe changes in the energy at a contact. ∆E is a has one symmetry of rotation — see section V) these function of all Nd positional degrees of freedom, and all yield 5 degrees of freedom. The resulting counting of 25

Particle f˜ x˜ ˜b Touch Rigidity Range z/2 x˜ zf/˜ 2 ˜b Frictionless Sphere 1 d d z ≤2d z 2d≥ z = 2d Frictional Sphere d d d(d+1)/2 z ≤ 2d z ≥ d+1 d+1 z 2d Frictionless Spheroid 1 5 5 z ≤ 10 z ≥ 10 z = 10≤ ≤ Frictional Spheroid 3 5 6 z ≤ 10 z ≥ 4 4 z 10 Frictionless Ellipsoid 1 d(d+1)/2 d(d+1)/2 z ≤ d(d+1) z ≥ d(d+1) z ≤= d(≤d+1) Frictional Ellipsoid d d(d+1)/2 d(d+1)/2 z ≤ d(d+1) z ≥ d+1 d+1 z d(d+1) ≤ ≥ ≤ ≤ TABLE I: Results of “Maxwell” constraint counting for a range of diﬀerent type of soft particles. As explained in the text, f˜ denotes the number of force components per contact,x ˜ denotes the geometrical number of freedom per particle and ˜b denotes the number of balance equations per particle. x˜ and corresponding inequalities are listed in table I. In The inequalities can be summarized as follows: For fric- particular, for frictional particles, the lower bound for the tionless particles, f˜ equals one, ˜b = f˜ and the lower and contact number is d + 1, while for frictionless particles it upper bounds coincide at z = 2˜x = 2˜b/f˜. For frictional depends on the symmetries of the particles. particles, 2˜x> 2˜b/f˜, the lower and upper bounds do not Results — The resulting inequalities are listed in ta- coincide, and a range of contact numbers is allowed at ble I. Note that the upper bounds for z coincide for fric- jamming. tional and frictionless particles, as this number only depends on the geometrical number of degrees of freedom.