DOCSLIB.ORG

Enbridge Companies Book of Authorities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MH-001-2013 File OF-AF-SAC 01 NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-7, as amended, and the regulations made thereunder; IN THE MATTER OF the RH-2-2008 Reasons for Decision of the National Energy Board dated May 26, 2009; AND IN THE MATTER OF a Joint Application by Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline LP, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC for Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P., Trans Québec & Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., carrying on business as Spectra Energy Transmission for Approval of the Process and Mechanism to Set Aside Pipeline Abandonment Funds, pursuant to the National Energy Board Act; AND IN THE MATTER OF Applications by Enbridge Pipelines Inc. and Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc. for Approvals of Proposals for the Collection of Abandonment Funds; AND IN THE MATTER OF Filings by Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc. on behalf of Enbridge Bakken Limited Partnership, Enbridge Pipelines (Westspur) Inc., Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc. on behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights Limited Partnership, Niagara Gas Transmission Limited, 2193914 Canada Limited and Vector Pipeline Limited Partnership of Proposals for the Setting Aside and Collection of Abandonment Funds. _____________________________________________________________________ ENBRIDGE COMPANIES' BOOK OF AUTHORITIES _____________________________________________________________________ February 5, 2014 6372782_2|NATDOCS - 2 - Table of Contents LEGISLATION 1. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c B-3 2. Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) 3. Interpretation Act, RSC 1985, c I-21 4. Perpetuities Act, RSA 2000, c P-5 5. Trustee Act, RSA 2000, c T-8 CASE LAW 1. Bank of Montreal v Northguard Holdings Ltd, [1987] MJ No 5, 1987 CarswellMan 281 (CA) 2. Collins v Ontario (Pension Commission), 56 OR (2d) 274, 1986 CarswellOnt 155 3. CRA Ruling No 2012-0463471R3, Single Reclamation Trust, 2013 4. CRA Ruling No 2012-0463871R3, Qualifying Site, 2013 5. Garron Family Trust (Trustee of) v R, 2010 FCA 309, 2010 CarswellNat 4259 6. Garron Family Trust (Trustee of) v R, 2009 TCC 450, 2009 CarswellNat 2600 7. Guerin v R, [1984] 2 SCR 335, 1984 CarswellNat 813 8. Jewish National Fund v Royal Trust Co, [1965] SCR 784, 1965 CarswellBC 60 9. Re Greenstreet Management Inc (2007), 38 CBR (5th) 307, 2007 CarswellOnt 7514 (Ont Sup Ct) 10. Rutherford v Swanick, 2010 ONSC 4596, 2010 CarswellOnt 6180 LEGAL TEXTS 1. Eileen E Gillese & Martha Milzcynski, The Law of Trusts, Second Edition (Toronto: Irwin Law Inc, 2005) CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Bankruptcy and Loi sur la faillite et Insolvency Act l’insolvabilité R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3 L.R.C. (1985), ch. B-3 Current to January 23, 2014 À jour au 23 janvier 2014 Last amended on April 1, 2013 Dernière modification le 1 avril 2013 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca Bankruptcy and Insolvency — January 23, 2014 the consumer debtor and to the official receiv- effet au débiteur consommateur et au séquestre er. officiel. Effect if (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in respect (2) Le paragraphe (1) ne s’applique pas si le Refus de se counselling of a consumer debtor who has refused or ne- débiteur consommateur a refusé ou omis de se prévaloir des refused consultations glected to receive counselling provided under prévaloir des consultations offertes aux termes paragraph 66.13(2)(b). de l’alinéa 66.13(2)b). 1992, c. 27, s. 32; 2005, c. 47, s. 56. 1992, ch. 27, art. 32; 2005, ch. 47, art. 56. Administrator’s 66.39 The form and content of the adminis- 66.39 La forme et le contenu des comptes de Comptes et accounts, trator’s accounts, the procedure for the prepara- l’administrateur ainsi que la procédure à suivre libération de discharge l’administrateur tion and taxation of those accounts and the pro- pour leur préparation et leur taxation et pour la cedure for the discharge of the administrator libération de l’administrateur sont déterminés shall be as prescribed. par les Règles générales. 1992, c. 27, s. 32. 1992, ch. 27, art. 32. Act to apply 66.4 (1) All the provisions of this Act, ex- 66.4 (1) Toutes les dispositions de la pré- Application de cept Division I of this Part, in so far as they are sente loi, sauf la section I de la présente partie, la présente loi applicable, apply, with such modifications as dans la mesure où elles sont applicables, s’ap- the circumstances require, to consumer propos- pliquent, compte tenu des adaptations de cir- als. constance, aux propositions de consommateur. Where consumer (2) Where a consumer proposal is made by a (2) Dans le cas d’une proposition de Application de debtor is consumer debtor who is a bankrupt, consommateur faite par un failli: la présente loi bankrupt (a) the consumer proposal must be approved a) la proposition doit être approuvée par les by the inspectors, if any, before any further inspecteurs, le cas échéant, avant que toute action is taken thereon; autre mesure ne soit prise à son égard; (b) the consumer debtor must have obtained b) le débiteur consommateur doit avoir obte- the assistance of a trustee who shall act as nu les services d’un syndic pour agir comme administrator of the proposal in the prepara- administrateur dans le cadre de la prépara- tion and execution thereof; tion et de l’exécution de la proposition; (c) the time with respect to which the claims c) le moment par rapport auquel les récla- of creditors shall be determined is the time at mations des créanciers sont déterminées est which the consumer debtor became celui où le débiteur consommateur est deve- bankrupt; and nu un failli; (d) the approval or deemed approval by the d) l’approbation — effective ou présumée court of the consumer proposal operates to — de la proposition par le tribunal a pour ef- annul the bankruptcy and to revest in the fet d’annuler la faillite et de réattribuer au consumer debtor, or in such other person as débiteur consommateur, ou à toute autre per- the court may approve, all the right, title and sonne que le tribunal peut approuver, le interest of the trustee in the property of the droit, le titre et l’intérêt complets du syndic consumer debtor, unless the terms of the aux biens du débiteur, à moins que les condi- consumer proposal otherwise provide. tions de la proposition ne soient à l’effet 1992, c. 27, s. 32; 1997, c. 12, s. 58. contraire. 1992, ch. 27, art. 32; 1997, ch. 12, art. 58. PART IV PARTIE IV PROPERTY OF THE BANKRUPT BIENS DU FAILLI Property of 67. (1) The property of a bankrupt divisible 67. (1) Les biens d’un failli, constituant le Biens du failli bankrupt among his creditors shall not comprise patrimoine attribué à ses créanciers, ne com- prennent pas les biens suivants: (a) property held by the bankrupt in trust for any other person; 106 Faillite et insolvabilité — 23 janvier 2014 (b) any property that as against the bankrupt a) les biens détenus par le failli en fiducie is exempt from execution or seizure under pour toute autre personne; any laws applicable in the province within b) les biens qui, selon le droit applicable which the property is situated and within dans la province dans laquelle ils sont situés which the bankrupt resides; et où réside le failli, ne peuvent faire l’objet (b.1) goods and services tax credit payments d’une mesure d’exécution ou de saisie contre that are made in prescribed circumstances to celui-ci; the bankrupt and that are not property re- b.1) dans les circonstances prescrites, les ferred to in paragraph (a) or (b); paiements qui sont faits au failli au titre de (b.2) prescribed payments relating to the es- crédits de taxe sur les produits et services et sential needs of an individual that are made qui ne sont pas des biens visés aux alinéas a) in prescribed circumstances to the bankrupt ou b); and that are not property referred to in para- b.2) dans les circonstances prescrites, les graph (a) or (b); or paiements prescrits qui sont faits au failli re- (b.3) without restricting the generality of lativement aux besoins essentiels de per- paragraph (b), property in a registered retire- sonnes physiques et qui ne sont pas des biens ment savings plan or a registered retirement visés aux alinéas a) ou b); income fund, as those expressions are de- b.3) sans restreindre la portée générale de fined in the Income Tax Act, or in any pre- l’alinéa b), les biens détenus dans un régime scribed plan, other than property contributed enregistré d’épargne-retraite ou un fonds en- to any such plan or fund in the 12 months be- registré de revenu de retraite, au sens de la fore the date of bankruptcy, Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu, ou dans tout ré- but it shall comprise gime prescrit, à l’exception des cotisations au régime ou au fonds effectuées au cours (c) all property wherever situated of the bankrupt at the date of the bankruptcy or that des douze mois précédant la date de la may be acquired by or devolve on the faillite, bankrupt before their discharge, including mais ils comprennent : any refund owing to the bankrupt under the c) tous les biens, où qu’ils soient situés, qui Income Tax Act in respect of the calendar appartiennent au failli à la date de la faillite, year — or the fiscal year of the bankrupt
Recommended publications
  • National Energy Board

    National Energy Board

    NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c N-7, as amended and the regulations made thereunder; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC as General Partner of Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and other related approvals pursuant to Part II of the NEBA for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project; AND IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board's reconsideration of aspects of its Recommendation Report, Hearing Order MH-052, File OF-Fac-Oil-T260-2013-03 59, as directed by the Governor in Council through Order in Council P.C. 2018 1177 To: Ms. Sheri Young Secretary of the Board National Energy Board Suite 210, 517 10 Ave SW Calgary, AB T2R 0A8 GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA BOOK OF AUTHORITIES FOR ITS LETTER IN RESPONSE TO THE NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD'S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS, DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2018 NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD HEARING ORDER MH—052-2018 FILE OF-FAC-OIL-T260-2013-03 59 November 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page (PDF) Jurisprudence Re Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd, [1998] 1 SCR 27 3 Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 153 14 Montreal (Ville) v 2952-1366 Quebec inc, 2005 SCC 62 140 Bell ExpressVu Ltd Partnership v Rex 178 NAV Canada c Wilmington Trust Co, 2006 SCC 24 197 Canada (Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency) v Taseko Mines Limited, 2018 BCSC 219 1034 Johnny v Adams Lake Indian Band, 2017 FCA 146 234 IWA, Local 2-69 v Consolidated Bathurst Packaging Ltd, [1990] 1 SCR 282 243 Board Decisions National Energy
  • Hester V. the Queen Et Al, [2008] 3 CTC 44

    Hester V. the Queen Et Al, [2008] 3 CTC 44

    Page 1 2 of 2 DOCUMENTS BETWEEN: JOSEPH HESTER, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent; AND BETWEEN: MILDRED BONDY, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Dockets: 2007-1428(IT)I; 2007-2500(IT)I TAX COURT OF CANADA 2010 TCC 647; 2010 Can. Tax Ct. LEXIS 929 December 20, 2010 [*1] Appeal heard on common evidence with Mildred Bondy (2007-2500(IT)I) on November 2, 3, 4, 2010 at Toronto, Ontario Appeal heard on common evidence with Joseph Hester (2007-1428(IT)I) on November 2, 3, 4, 2010 at Toronto, Ontario COUNSEL: Appearances: Counsel for the Appellant: Jaimie Lickers Kanata Penn-Maracle (student-at-law) Counsel for the Respondent: Craig Maw Annie Paré JUDGES: The Honourable Justice Judith Woods OPINION: JUDGMENT The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 taxation years is dismissed. Each party shall bear their own costs. Page 2 2010 TCC 647; 2010 Can. Tax Ct. LEXIS 929, *1 JUDGMENT The appeal with respect to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the 1999 and 2000 taxation years is dismissed. Each party shall bear their own costs. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Woods J. [1] The appellants, Joseph Hester and Mildred Bondy, are status Indians who during the relevant periods worked at Anishnawbe Health Toronto (AHT), a community health centre located in Toronto. The appellants were not employees of AHT, but were employed by Roger Obonsawin, who carries on a placement business under the name Native Leasing Services [*2] (NLS).
  • January 26, 2017, at 5 P.M

    January 26, 2017, at 5 P.M

    MINUTES w w w .b a r r e a u d e m o n t r e a l .q c .c a Liaison Committee with the Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court Meeting held at 30 McGill Street in Montréal, on January 26, 2017, at 5 p.m. Present: Present for the Montréal Bar: For the Federal Court of Appeal: Francisco Couto, Chair The Honourable Magali Fournier Marc Noël Emma Lambert Chantal Carbonneau Pierre Lamothe Joanie Lapalme For the Federal Court: Claudia Andrea Molina The Honourable Felipe Morales Paul S. Crampton Alexandra Steele The Honourable Jocelyne Gagné Michel Claude Synnott The Honourable George R. Locke The Honourable Luc Martineau Also present: The Honourable Jean Michel Desgagnés, who recorded the deliberations. Michel M. J. Shore Richard Morneau, Prothonotary Absent: Sylvia MacKenzie Michael N. Bergman Peter Shams For the Courts Administration Service: Daniel Gosselin, Chief Administrator Nancy Deslauriers Martine Daoust 1. OPENING AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The Chair declared the meeting open at 5 p.m. The agenda was adopted as presented. 2. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS The Chair welcomed the representatives of the Judiciary, the Bar and the CAS and emphasized that the objective of the Liaison Committee is to create a forum for discussion between the Montréal Bar and the Federal Courts. All of the participants introduced themselves. The Judiciary highlighted the importance of the Committee and said it was proud to be a part of it. 3. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING ON MARCH 7, 2016 The minutes were adopted as written. 4.