DOCSLIB.ORG

Networks in Argentine Agriculture: a Multiple-Case Study Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Networks in Argentine Agriculture: a Multiple-Case Study Approach ISSN 0080-2107 Networks in Argentine agriculture: a multiple-case study approach Sebastián Senesi Recebido em 25/maio/2012 Fabio Ribas Chaddad Aprovado em 30/janeiro/2013 Hernán Palau Sistema de Avaliação: Double Blind Review Editor Científico: Nicolau Reinhard DOI: 10.5700/rausp1088 Sebastián Senesi, Mestre em Agronegocios y Alimentos, é Codiretor do Programa de Agronegocios y Alimentos na Facultad de Agronomía da Universidad Redes na agricultura argentina: um estudo de de Buenos Aires (UBA) (Buenos Aires – Argentina), caso múltiplo Professor de Economia y Gestão de Agronegocios y Alimentos e Competitividade de Cadeias A Argentina está entre os quatro maiores produtores de soja, Agroalimentarias na Maestría en Agronegocios y RESUMO girassol, milho e trigo, entre outros produtos agrícolas. As mu- Alimentos, Pesquisador da UBA Categoria V, Consultor em organismos públicos e empresas em temas de danças institucionais e políticas na década de 1990 incentivaram governança, planificação estratégica, qualidade e o desenvolvimento da agricultura na Argentina e na introdução redesenho organizacionais. de inovações de produtos e tecnologias (plantio direto, aumento E-mail: [email protected] do uso de agrotóxicos, transgênicos, GPS) e novos investimentos Endereço: em plantas de crushing em soja e girassol. Além de mudanças Universidad de Buenos Aires – UBA tecnológicas, uma revolução silenciosa ocorreu na produção Facultad de Agronomía Programa de Agronegocios y Alimentos agrícola: de uma agricultura de autoprodução ou propriedade para Avenida San Martín, 4453 uma agricultura com base no contrato. O objetivo neste trabalho é C1417DSE – Buenos Aires – Argentina explorar e descrever o surgimento de redes no setor de produção Fabio Ribas Chaddad, Engenheiro Agrônomo pela agrícola na Argentina. São apresentados e descritos quatro casos Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” da que, atualmente, constituem cerca de 50% do plantio total de grãos Universidade de São Paulo, Mestre em Administração na Argentina: forma híbrida informal, trust, estrutura orientada para pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e o investidor, e rede de redes. Em todos os casos, abordam-se as Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo, Ph.D. formas híbridas envolvendo um grupo de atores unidos por objeti- em Economia Aplicada pela University of Missouri vos comuns, principalmente para aumentar a produção em escala, (Columbia, Estados Unidos), é Professor Doutor no Insper – Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa compartilhar recursos e melhorar a rentabilidade. Essas formas de (CEP 04546-042 – São Paulo/SP, Brasil). organização são altamente flexíveis e mostram grande capacidade E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] de adaptação aos desafios, além de serem competitivas, porque têm Hernán Palau, Mestre em Agronegocios y Alimentos, incentivos alinhados, flexibilidade e adaptabilidade. é Coordenador da Área de Pesquisa do Programa de Agronegocios y Alimentos na Facultad de Agronomía Palavras-chave: contratos, formas hibridas, rede de redes, da Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) (Buenos colaboração interfirma, relações. Aires – Argentina), Professor de Economia y Gestão dos Agronegocios y Alimentos e Competitividade de Cadeias Agroalimentarias na Maestría en 1. INTRODUCTION Agronegocios y Alimentos, Pesquisador da UBA Categoria IV, Consultor em organismos públicos e empresas em temas de governança, planificação Due to natural resource endowments and continuous productivity gains, estratégica e qualidade. Argentina is in a unique position to produce food, agricultural, and livestock E-mail: [email protected] R.Adm., São Paulo, v.48, n.2, p.281-294, abr./maio/jun. 2013 281 Sebastián Senesi, Fabio Ribas Chaddad, and Hernán Palau products. Perhaps not surprisingly Argentina is one of the lead- different actors participating in agricultural production and ing producers and exporters of agrifood products. Argentina commercialization. is among the four largest producers of soybeans, sunflower Producers developed complex organizational arrangements seeds, corn, and wheat; is also the world’s 5th largest export- and business relationships involving contractors, producers, er of wheat, the 2nd largest exporter of corn, the 3rd largest suppliers, processors, exporters, banks, and individual inves- exporter of sunflower seed and soybean, and the number one tors (some with no previous experience in the farming sector). exporter of sunflower and soybean oils and pellets. For the past These hybrid arrangements – that are neither markets nor 20 years, the agrifood sector has been a fundamental engine hierarchies – provided the institutional framework necessa- of economic growth as the main generator of export and tax ry to reduce transaction costs and build trust among agents, revenues in Argentina. such that contracts and exchange could continue to occur in a Traditionally, farming took place in small and medium sized highly uncertain institutional and international environment. family farms, using mostly their own land, labour, credits, and Nowadays unofficial sources estimate that about 50% of total agricultural machinery (CHADDAD et al., 2009). Producers agricultural production in Argentina is carried out by these owned enough equipment to cope with all required activities hybrid organizational forms. of the production season. In some specific cases, services were The objective of this paper is to explore and describe the contracted for machinery with a higher specificity level in re- emergence of new organizational forms in the Argentine crop lation to the area worked by the producer, such as harvesting production sector. Specific objectives are: to explain why these services. The scale of production was limited to land property, organizational forms emerged, and to describe their evolution and so were productivity and revenues. and governance structure. In the 1990s the Argentine economy was open to global- The paper is organized as follows. Chapter 2 describes the ization, free market rules were adopted, and state-owned theoretical framework and the methodology used. Chapter 3 companies were privatized. Hyperinflation was finally kept identifies the main institutional changes and the impact they under control with the implementation of the currency board had on the organization of farming and agribusiness in gen- that linked the local peso to the US dollar. As a result of these eral. Chapter 4 describes the organizational forms using the policy changes, the 1990s were a decade of economic stabili- netchain approach (LAZZARINI, CHADDAD, and COOK, ty and growth based on the convertibility rule (one peso-one 2001). Finally, conclusions and possible trends in the Argentine dollar). These institutional and policy changes fostered the agricultural organizational environment are described. development of Argentine agriculture and the introduction of innovative process and product technologies, including no- 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND -till cropping systems, fertilizers, agrochemicals, genetically PROCEDURES modified soybean seeds, precision agriculture systems (with the use of GPS), and new investments in modern, large-scale 2.1. Theoretical framework sunflower and soybean processing plants (ORDÓÑEZ and NICHOLS, 2003). In order to describe hybrid arrangements in the Argenti- In addition to these technological changes, a quiet revolu- ne agricultural sector the paper introduces Transaction Cost tion occurred in the way agricultural production was carried out Economics (COASE, 1937; KLEIN, CRAWFORD, and AL- and organized: from self-production (or ownership) agriculture CHIAN, 1978; WILLIAMSON, 1979 and 1985) and organiz­ (using own lands) to an agriculture based on contracts and ational interdependence (THOMPSON, 1967; LAZZARINI, organizational relationships. These institutional arrange- CHADDAD, and COOK, 2001; MÉNARD, 2004) theoretical ments were service contracts, land rental contracts, harvesting frameworks. contracts, future markets contracts, and insurance contracts, The Transaction Cost theory introduced by Coase (1937) among others. The agricultural production sector increasingly has become a standard framework for the study of organ- shifted to a large-scale business model, and farming expanded izations. Coase (1937) introduced the notion that firms and by using third-party lands in order to increase production while markets are alternative “institutional arrangements” to govern using the same capacity (fixed costs). transactions. In particular, he posited that the firm supersedes As production areas expanded, it became impractical for the market when the transaction costs of internal organization framers to move their own machinery around. Agents then are relatively lower than in the market. In this sense, firm arose for local suppliers of sowing services, crop-spraying, boundaries depend not only on technology, but also on or - harvesting, and pest control at the new production sites. In g anizational considerations; that is, on the costs and benefits other words, producers started to outsource to service providers of various organizational alternatives. Building on Coase’s activities that were previously vertically integrated. A new original insight, the Transaction Cost approach emphasizes that business model emerged to develop large-scale, high tech- vertical coordination can be an efficient means of protecting nology agriculture through contractual arrangements among relationship­specific investments or mitigating other potential 282 R.Adm., São
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relationships Between Agriculture, Nonagriculture, and Foreign Trade in the Development of Argentina and Peru
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development Volume Author/Editor: Erik Thorbecke, ed. Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-203-8 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/thor70-1 Publication Date: 1970 Chapter Title: Relationships Between Agriculture, Nonagriculture, and Foreign Trade in the Development of Argentina and Peru Chapter Author: Erik Thorbecke, Alfred J. Field Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3365 Chapter pages in book: (p. 165 - 218) r Al the her ion the my Relationships Between Agriculture, ted Nonagriculture, and Foreign Trade in the Development of Argentina and Peru lv- ity we ERIK THORBECKE IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY rm AND - it) ias ALFRED J. FIELD UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA )e- an, THE PRESENT STUDY iS an attempt to analyze the economic development of Argentina and Peru in terms of vital relationships within the princi- pal productive sectors and between these sectors and foreign trade. Section 1is devoted to the formulation of the analytical framework used in the study. The main elements of the framework are: (a) a sec- toral breakdown in terms of agriculture, industry and the service com- plex, (b) a specification of the major relationships between sectors (e.g., technological, income and price relationships), and (c) the formulation NOTE: Much of the work on this paper was done under the auspices of the AID. summer research program in1967, The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not in any way commit the Agency for International Development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ecology of Genetically Modified Soy in Argentina
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2014 Roundup Ready Nation: The Political Ecology Of Genetically Modified Soy In Argentina Amalia Leguizamon Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/61 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] ROUNDUP READY NATION: THE POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED SOY IN ARGENTINA by AMALIA LEGUIZAMÓN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 AMALIA LEGUIZAMÓN All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Professor Kenneth A. Gould Date Chair of the Examining Committee Professor Philip Kasinitz Date Executive Officer Professor John L. Hammond Professor William Kornblum Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract ROUNDUP READY NATION: THE POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED SOY IN ARGENTINA by Amalia Leguizamón Adviser: Professor Kenneth A. Gould This dissertation is a case study of agrarian transformation in an agro-export society, Argentina. I study the process of adoption of the technological package of genetically modified (GM) soy in the Argentine countryside, its socio-ecological consequences, and Argentines’ responses to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of the Agricultural Systems of Argentina to Climate Change
    CLIMATE RESEARCH Published December 29 Clim Res Vulnerability of the agricultural systems of Argentina to climate change Graciela 0. Magrin*,Maria I. Travasso, Raul A. Diaz, Rafael 0.Rodriguez Instituto de Clima y Agua, Centro de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, 1712 Castelar, Buenos Aires. Argentina ABSTRACT: Agricultural production is one of the pillars of the Argentinean economy. The contribution of this sector is expected to keep growing in the near future as a consequence of the current techno- logical development trend. However, the projected changes in climate and in the atmospheric concen- tration of CO2in the coming years is likely to affect the productivity of crops, thus causing an impact on the national economy. This paper addresses climate change impact on the production of the main crops of the Argentinean pampean region by means of crop growth and development simulation models for wheat, maize and soybean included in DSSAT v. 3.0 (Dension Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu). The weather data used includes temperature, global solar radia- tion and precipitation values from 23 sites within the region (current climate conditions) and the corre- sponding GISS general circulation model projections for the year 2050 (future climate) with CO2 con- centrations of 330 and 550 ppm respectively. According to the results obtained, a generalized increase In soybean yield and a decrease in maize yield would occur. Wheat yield is likely to increase in the southern and the western parts of the region and decrease towards the north. Wheat and soybean pro- duction in the pampean region would increase by 3.6 and 20.7 % respectively, while maize production would be reduced by 16.5%.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. the Agricultural Sector in Argentina
    CHAPTER 14 TThehe AAgriculturalgricultural SectorSector inin AArgentina:rgentina: MMajorajor TrendsTrends andand RecentRecent DevelopmentsDevelopments Sergio H. Lence 1. INTRODUCTION Historically, Argentina has been among the world leaders in the production and/or export of agricultural products. The main reason for this is that it is a country relatively sparsely populated but richly endowed with natural resources for production agriculture. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (FAOSTAT database), in 2006 Argentina accounted for only 0.59% of the world’s population, but for a much higher 2.10% of the world’s to- tal land area. Furthermore, Argentina’s shares of the world’s arable land and the planet’s area with permanent meadows and pastures were even higher, at 2.23% and 2.96%, respectively. As shown in Table 14.1, Argentina produced 8.4% of world agricultural out- put and accounted for 2.9% of world agricultural trade over the period 2005-07. Such fi gures make Argentina the eighth-largest producer and the twelfth larg- est exporter of agricultural commodities in the world. Argentina’s much smaller share of world exports (2.9%) compared to its share of world output (8.4%) is largely explained by the fact that Argentina tends to export commodities with relatively low value-added levels. Commodities for which the country is particu- larly relevant in world markets are soybeans and its associated products, soybean oil and soybean meal. Argentina is the top exporter of soybean oil and soybean Sergio Lence, a native of Argentina, is a professor of economics and the Marlin Cole Chair of International Agricultural Economics at Iowa State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?
    Is GM Soybean cultivation in Argentina sustainable ? Pascale Phelinas, Johanna Choumert To cite this version: Pascale Phelinas, Johanna Choumert. Is GM Soybean cultivation in Argentina sustainable ?. 2018. ird-01875358 HAL Id: ird-01875358 https://hal.ird.fr/ird-01875358 Preprint submitted on 17 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. C E N T R E D ' E TUDES ET DE RECHERCHES SUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL SÉRIE ÉTUDES ET DOCUMENTS Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable? Johanna Choumert Pascale Phélinas Études et Documents n° 14 August 2016 To cite this document: Choumert J., Phélinas P. (2016) “ Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?", Études et Documents, n° 14, CERDI. http://cerdi.org/production/show/id/1818/type_production_id/1 CERDI 65 BD. F. MITTERRAND 63000 CLERMONT FERRAND – FRANCE TEL. + 33 4 73 17 74 00 FAX + 33 4 73 17 74 28 www.cerdi.org Études et Documents n° 14, CERDI, 2016 The authors Dr. Johanna Choumert, Senior Research Manager Economic Development Initiatives (E.D.I.) P.O. Box 393, Bukoba, Kagera region, Tanzania E-mail: [email protected] Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina
    Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) considerations A Argentina is a regional leader in agricultural uptake. Likewise, strengthening small-scale farmers’ research and development (R&D), and a model for access to credit and existing insurance schemes can P South-South cooperation in agriculture. This strength catalyze the adoption and out scaling of existing on- offers a valuable entry point for mainstreaming CSA in farm CSA initiatives. agricultural development, especially if strategies that Identification of suitable CSA options that maintain target small-scale producers and marginal agricultural A and/or boost productivity can be enhanced by regions are strengthened and if efforts are systematic. P the development and open access to Decision- A No-tillage techniques, adopted widely for cereals Support Systems that compile and analyze weather, and oilseeds around the country, have improved agronomic, and market information and deliver results P water use efficiency and reduced soil erosion. These to a range of stakeholders and decision makers. benefits can be maximized if complemented with Changes in land use in the past decades and diversification, adequate fertilization and rotations. A competition over resources require a holistic P A Enhanced nutrient and fertilizer recycling approach to manage farmland, rangeland and practices, for export-oriented crops along with natural ecosystems. Decisions at farm and policy M precise application of fertilizers based on cultivars level need to be oriented towards short-, medium-, P and soil type, would allow for the maintenance and and long-term horizons and to address interactions regeneration of soil natural capital in key agricultural between forest, cropland and livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • Theme Overview: the Agricultural Production Potential of Latin America: Implications for Global Food Supply and Trade
    3rd Quarter 2019 • 34(3) Theme Overview: The Agricultural Production Potential of Latin America: Implications for Global Food Supply and Trade Elizabeth Canales and Marco Palma JEL Classifications: N56, Q13, Q17, Q18 Keywords: Agriculture, Infrastructure, Investment, Latin America, Policy, Production, Trade The Latin American region is an important U.S. trade partner. Historically, the region has been a significant supplier of fruit and vegetables during the winter months in the Articles in this Theme: United States. High-value specialty crops, Brazil’s Agricultural Production and Its Potential as which are generally labor-intensive and Global Food Supplier highly perishable, have gained prominence in Latin America due to increased demand Yuri Clements Daglia Calil and Luis Ribera and improvements in production efficiency, Agricultural Production Potential in Southern Cone: infrastructure, and transportation (Palma, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay Ribera, and Bessler, 2013). This trend is Alvaro Durand-Morat expected to continue, particularly for Mexico’s Agricultural Sector: Production Potential functional foods (Kotilainen et al., 2006; Liu, and Implications for Trade 2013; Palma, Ribera, and Knutson, 2016). Elizabeth Canales, Graciela Andrango, and Angelica However, countries like Brazil and Williams Argentina, are large producers of oilseeds The Andean Region: An Important and Growing U.S. and meat and compete directly with U.S. Agricultural Trade Partner agricultural products in international markets (Muhammad and Valdes, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Development and Trade in Latin America: Prospects for Reform
    Agricultural Development and Trade in Latin America: Prospects for Reform Alberto Valdes Reprinteo from U.S. Agriculture and Third World Development: The Critical Linkage, (ed. Randall B. Purcell and Elizibeth Morrison) ,Lynne Rienrner Publishers, 1987 08 pV. ln'.C2Q USA Reprint No. 108 chapter three Agricultural Development and Trade in Latin America: Prospects for Reform Alberto Valdes The first part oC this chapter presents an overview of the trends in consump­ tion, production, and trade of food and nonfood agricultural products in latin America since 1960. 1discuss the dynamics of agrict:ltUral growth and analyze diverse prolblems in a f(ood security strategy for the region. This is followed by an attempt to characterize the two principal policy instruments governments use for agriculture: government expenditures and incentives policies. These two sets of policies are used extensively to influence agricultural lperformance, and they represent the "revealed" de­ velopment strategies toward agriculture. I also present a quantita:ive de­ scription of the !evel and impact of government expenditure policics on ag­ ricultural growth in nine Latin American countries from 1950 to 19-,O. hle last part of the chapter examines agricultural production incentive policies for selected South American countries from 1960 to 1983. I end my discussion with an examination of the long-run effects of incentives on the performance of agriculture in Argentina and Chile since 1960. Food Consumption in Latin America, 1960-1980 )evelopments in R)od ConsimplionandNuhtion Food consumption in Latin America since 1960 ha'; grown at an annual rate of 2.8 percent, about the same rate as population growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina
    Climate-Smart Agriculture in Peru Supplementary material This publication is a product of the collaborative effort between the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the lead center of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS); the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE); and the World Bank to identify country-specific baselines on CSA in seven countries in Latin America: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Grenada, Mexico, and Peru. The document was prepared under the co-leadership of Andrew Jarvis and Caitlin Corner- Dolloff (CIAT), Claudia Bouroncle (CATIE), and Svetlana Edmeades and Ana Bucher (World Bank). The main author of this profile was María Baca (CIAT), and the team was comprised of Andreea Nowak (CIAT), Miguel Lizarazo (CIAT), Pablo Imbach (CATIE), Andrew Halliday (CATIE), Beatriz Zavariz-Romero (CIAT), Rauf Prasodjo (CIAT), Claudia Medellín (CATIE), Karolina Argote (CIAT), Chelsea Cervantes De Blois (CIAT), Juan Carlos Zamora (CATIE), and Bastiaan Louman (CATIE). This supplementary material should be cited as: World Bank; CIAT; CATIE. 2014. Supplementary material to Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina. CSA Country Profiles for Latin America Series. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Group. Special thanks to the institutions that provided information for this study: MINAGRI, INIA, AGRO RURAL, ANA, MINAM-PNCB, MINAM-IMA, IICA, CIP, UNALM, Swiss Cooperation (COSUDE and Helvetas), FAO, FNI, JNC, UP, CARE PERU, CES, ASAP, ABSP. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Food Tradition and Culture in Argentina Jake Sproull, Chinese American International School, San Francisco, CA
    Fulbright‐Hays Curriculum Project: Argentina, 2011 Food Tradition and Culture in Argentina Jake Sproull, Chinese American International School, San Francisco, CA Grade Level and Subject Area: Middle School Social Studies Social Studies Topic Areas: Geography & Topography; Environmental Studies; Food Traditions & Culture Unit Summary This is a one–two week unit (5 lessons) for grade 6. It can easily be included within a larger unit about food traditions around the world, or introduced as a part of a larger unit on South America. In this series of lessons, students will first learn about the topography of Argentina and the role the land has played in the history of the country and its agricultural industry. Next, students will see how the agricultural and livestock industry is reflected in the Argentine national history and diet. In the third segment of the unit, students will learn about two cultural elements that are unique to Argentina’s landscape, history, and diet (the gaucho and yerba mate). Finally, students will compare a typical Argentine diet to their own diets, in order to highlight some of the differences found in Argentine cuisine. Esse n tial Questions: 1. How are geography and landscape connected to culture? 2. How is Argentine culture different from/similar to the culture of the USA? 3. How do differences in diet reflect the national cultures of Argentina and the US A? Unit Goals 1. Students will gain an understanding of Argentina’s basic geography, interact with a topographical map, and learn the terminology to describe the different landscapes of Argentina. 2. Students will explore the relationship of topography, agriculture, diet, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina Supplementary Material
    Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina Supplementary material This publication is a product of the collaborative effort between the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the lead center of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS); the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE); and the World Bank to identify country-specific baselines on CSA in seven countries in Latin America: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Grenada, Mexico, and Peru. The document was prepared under the co-leadership of Andrew Jarvis and Caitlin Corner- Dolloff (CIAT), Claudia Bouroncle (CATIE), and Svetlana Edmeades and Ana Bucher (World Bank). The main author of this profile was Andreea Nowak (CIAT), and the team was comprised of Miguel Lizarazo (CIAT), Pablo Imbach (CATIE), Andrew Halliday (CATIE), Beatriz Zavariz- Romero (CIAT), Rauf Prasodjo (CIAT), María Baca (CIAT), Claudia Medellín (CATIE), Karolina Argote (CIAT), Chelsea Cervantes De Blois (CIAT), Juan Carlos Zamora (CATIE), and Bastiaan Louman (CATIE). This supplementary material should be cited as: World Bank; CIAT; CATIE. 2014. Supplementary material to Climate-Smart Agriculture in Argentina. CSA Country Profiles for Latin America Series. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Group. Special thanks to the institutions that provided information for this study: MAGyP (SAGyP, ORA, UCAR), SAyDS (DCC), WB Office in Argentina, INTA (ICA, IS), IICA, AACREA, AAPRESID, TNC. This profile has benefited from comments received from
    [Show full text]
  • Trade, Structural Transformation and Development: Evidence from Argentina 1869-1914
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TRADE, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM ARGENTINA 1869-1914 Pablo Fajgelbaum Stephen J. Redding Working Paper 20217 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20217 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2014, Revised September 2021 We would like to thank Princeton University and UCLA for research support. Pablo Fajgelbaum thanks the UCLA Ziman Center for Real Estate for financial support. We are grateful to the editor and four anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments. We would like to thank Stephan Heblich and Ferdinand Rauch for their help with the GIS data. We also would like to thank Victoria Barone, Andres Maggi, Mariano Somale and particularly Brian Pustilnik, Maximilian Schwarz, and Iván Torre for excellent research assistance. We are grateful to the editor, four anonymous referees, Jeremy Adelman, Treb Allen, Ariel Burstein, Paula Bustos, Dave Donaldson, Pablo Gerchunoff, Rick Hornbeck, Kiminori Matsuyama, Jonathan Vogel, and Kei- Mu Yi for helpful comments; to David Lagakos and Treb Allen for conference discussions; and to conference and seminar participants at AEA, Berkeley, Brown, CEPR, Columbia, EIEF, European Economic Association (EEA), Harvard, LACEA, MIT, NBER, North American Meetings of the Econometric Society, NYU, Princeton, Stanford, Toronto, UCLA, Urban Economics Association (UEA), UTDT, Wisconsin, and Yale for helpful comments. Responsibility for results, opinions and errors is the authors’ alone. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.
    [Show full text]