A Geophilomorph Centipede (Chilopoda) from La Buzinie Amber (Late Cretaceous, Cenomanian), SW France
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A geophilomorph centipede (Chilopoda) from La Buzinie amber (Late Cretaceous, Cenomanian), SW France Gregory D. EDGECOMBE Natural History Museum, Department of Palaeontology, Cromwell road, London SW7 5BD (United Kingdom) [email protected] Alessandro MINELLI Lucio BONATO Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Biologia, via Ugo Bassi 58 B, I-35131 Padova (Italy) [email protected] [email protected] Edgecombe G. D., Minelli A. & Bonato L. 2009. — A geophilomorph centipede (Chilopoda) from La Buzinie amber (Late Cretaceous, Cenomanian), SW France. Geodiversitas 31 (1) : 29-39. ABSTRACT Th e fi rst geophilomorph centipede to be documented from Mesozoic amber and the second Mesozoic member of the order is described as Buziniphilus anti quus n. gen., n. sp. It is represented by a single, probably immature speci- KEY WORDS men from Early Cenomanian amber at La Buzinie, Champniers, Charentes, Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, France. Buziniphilus n. gen. is most probably a member of either Schendylidae Schendylidae, or Geophilidae, though documentation of the labrum and mandibles is required Geophilidae, Buziniphilus n. gen., to make a defi nitive familial assignment. Referral of Buziniphilus n. gen. to the amber, crown-group Adesmata, together with a reinterpretation of the structure of the Cretaceous, forcipulae in the Jurassic Eogeophilus Schweigert & Dietl, 1997, reinforces the France, new genus, modern aspect of Mesozoic chilopods that had been indicated by Cretaceous new species. scutigeromorph and scolopendromorph fossils. GEODIVERSITAS • 2009 • 31 (1) © Publications Scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.geodiversitas.com 29 Edgecombe G. D. et al. RÉSUMÉ Un chilopode géophilomorphe (Chilopoda) de l’ambre de La Buzinie (Crétacé supérieur, Cénomanien), SW de la France. Le premier chilopode géophilomorphe connu de l’ambre du Mésozoïque et le deuxième représentant mésozoïque de l’ordre Geophilomorpha est décrit sous le nom Buziniphilus antiquus n. gen., n. sp. Ce chilopode est décrit à partir d’un exemplaire unique, probablement juvénile, de l’ambre du Cénomanien inférieur MOTS CLÉS de La Buzinie, Champniers, département de la Charente, France. Buziniphilus Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, n. gen. appartient très probablement à l’une ou l’autre des familles Schendylidae Schendylidae, ou Geophilidae, mais la découverte du labre et de la mandibule demeure essen- Geophilidae, Buziniphilus n. gen., tielle pour une attribution défi nitive à une famille. L’assignation de Buziniphilus ambre, n. gen. au « groupe-couronne » Adesmata et une réinterprétation des forcipules Crétacé, du genre jurassique Eogeophilus Schweigert & Dietl, 1997, renforcent l’aspect France, genre nouveau, moderne des chilopodes mésozoïques déjà mis en évidence par les fossiles cré- espèce nouvelle. tacés appartenant aux scutigeromorphes et scolopendromorphes. INTRODUCTION 1998: pl. 22, fi g. d), but this material has not re- ceived a recent systematic study. Described species Of the fi ve extant chilopod orders, Geophilo- from Baltic amber are limited to those named by morpha is the most diverse at both the familial and Menge in Koch & Berendt (1854), i.e. Geophilus specifi c levels, its c. 1260 described species being brevicaudatus, G. crassicornis and G. fi liformis. An- assigned to 14 currently recognised families (Minelli other Cenozoic fossil geophilomorph, Calciphilus 2006). Although the fossil record of the chilopod abboti Chamberlin, 1949, is known from a single, crown-group is now known to extend back to the incomplete specimen (Chamberlin 1949). In the Upper Silurian (Shear et al. 1998), the oldest well- present work we establish a new genus and species established geophilomorph fossil dates to the Upper for a geophilo morph preserved in La Buzinie am- Jurassic. Eogeophilus jurassicus Schweigert & Dietl, ber, of Late Cretaceous age (Early Cenomanian; 1997, the earliest known geophilomorph, is repre- Perrichot et al. 2007a, b). sented by a single specimen from the Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Kimmeridgian), SW Germany. Th e sister group of Geophilomorpha, the Scolopen- MATERIALS AND METHODS dromorpha, has a fi rst known occurrence in the Upper Carboniferous (Mundel 1979), calibrating a A single chilopod specimen (BUZ 1.8), housed in minimal date for divergence of these two orders, and the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, thus predicting the geophilomorph stem-group to has been collected in La Buzinie amber (Perrichot have been in existence by the Upper Carboniferous. et al. 2007a: table 2). Th e amber surrounding the Although an Upper Carboniferous taxon, Ilyodes centipede was removed with a shaving blade and the attenuata Matthew, 1894, has been suggested as a specimen was mounted in Canada balsam between possible geophilomorph (Shear & Bonamo 1988), cover glasses, as described by Perrichot et al. (2004). examination of the material rejects its identity as a Th e specimen was examined under several stereo chilopod (W. A. Shear pers. comm.). and compound transmitted light microscopes. Dig- More recent fossil geophilomorphs are repre- ital images focused at varying levels were captured sented by specimens that occur in Cenozoic ambers, using a Leica DMR microscope coupled with a notably Baltic amber (e.g., Weitschat & Wichard Leica DFC480 digital camera. Drawings were made 30 GEODIVERSITAS • 2009 • 31 (1) Geophilomorph centipede (Chilopoda) from Cenomanian French amber from these high magnifi cation images. Images in (convergent backwards for most of their length in Figures 1, 2 and 4 are composites of diff erent focal Buziniphilus n. gen., vs. parallel for most of their planes merged in Adobe Photoshop. Descriptive length in Hapleurytion) and in the claw of the legs terminology follows that employed in recent work of the last pair (absent in Buziniphilus n. gen., vs. on Schendylidae (e.g., Pereira et al. 2004). well developed in Hapleurytion). SYSTEMATICS Buziniphilus antiquus n. sp. (Figs 1-4) Order GEOPHILOMORPHA Pocock, 1895 Chilopoda indet. – Perrichot et al. 2007a: fi g. 2A. Genus Buziniphilus n. gen. HOLOTYPE. — BUZ 1.8 (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris), complete specimen, probably imma- TYPE SPECIES. — Buziniphilus antiquus n. sp. ture. ETYMOLOGY. — For the type locality, La Buzinie, com- ETYMOLOGY. — Antiquus, with reference to the age of the pounded with the usual geophilomorph suffi x -philus. species, one of two known Mesozoic geophilomorphs. DIAGNOSIS. — Cephalic plate slightly longer than wide. DIAGNOSIS. — As for the genus. Antennae fi liform, maintaining even width along entire length. Apical claw of second maxillae well developed, TYPE LOCALITY. — La Buzinie amber, subunit A2 of non-pectinate. Forcipular tergum narrower than tergum Perrichot et al. (2007b), Champniers, département de la of fi rst pedigerous segment. Forcipular coxopleural su- Charente, France; Early Cenomanian fi de Perrichot et al. tures evidently convergent backwards for most of their (2007b). Note that previous labelling of the holotype as length. Forcipulae without teeth. Sternal pores absent Late Albian (Perrichot et al. 2007a: fi g. 2) is an error. along entire trunk. Sternum of last pedigerous segment wider than long. Last leg slightly shorter than those on preceding segments, the telopodite composed of six DESCRIPTION podomeres, without praetarsal claw. Body length c. 12 mm; maximum body width c. 0.4 mm (excluding legs). REMARKS Cephalic plate only slightly domed, subrectan- In comparison to the most similar geophilomorph gular, about 1.2 times as long as wide, anterior genera (for the criteria for selection among the margin weakly convex or angled, lateral margins extant genera, see under Discussion), Buziniphilus evenly convex, posterior margin weakly concave n. gen. diff ers from both Geophilus Leach, 1814, (Fig. 2A). Setae of the cephalic plate shorter than and Schendyla Bergsøe & Meinert, 1866, in the those on basal antennal articles; setae apparently legs of the last pair (shorter than those of preced- sparse on dorsal surface of cephalic plate; cuticular ing segments in Buziniphilus n. gen. vs. as long as scutes well marked on anterior and anterolateral or longer in both Schendyla and Geophilus) and in part of cephalic plate (Fig. 2B). the coxal pores (apparently no pores in Buzini- Antennae well separated at their bases (Fig. 2C). philus n. gen., vs. at least two large pores on each Each antenna composed of 14 articles, 3.3 times as coxopleuron in Schendyla and in Geophilus), from long as cephalic plate, fi liform, maintaining even Geophilus also in the claw of the legs of the last pair width along entire length, not noticeably attenu- (absent in Buziniphilus n. gen., vs. well developed ate distally (Figs 1B; 3B); setae arranged in two or in Geophilus); from Haploschendyla Verhoeff , 1900, three whorls on each article (Fig. 1E), much more and Hapleurytion Verhoeff , 1940, in the sternal numerous and scattered on article XIV; article XIV pores (apparently absent in Buziniphilus n. gen., vs. nearly twice as long as wide, 2.2 times as long as present and arranged in evident pore fi elds in both penultimate article XIII (Fig. 1A). Haploschendyla and Hapleurytion), from Hapleurytion Clypeus: areolation apparently uniform, at least also in the shape of the forcipular coxopleural sutures on central part, only a few short setae present. GEODIVERSITAS • 2009 • 31 (1) 31 Edgecombe G. D. et al. B A C D E FIG. 1. — Buziniphilus antiquus n. gen., n. sp., holotype, ventral views: A, antennal articles XII-XIV, right antenna;